The Insane Engineering behind the Joby S4

Рет қаралды 45,622

Күн бұрын

PCB boards, CNC machining, Sheet metal fabrication, Injection molding, and 3D printing ➡️ www.pcbway.com/
You can now Sponsor my next eVTOL Innovation KZfaq video!
Get your product, service, or content in front of an audience of 231,500 viewers per video [Average]
Reserve a Sponsorship ➡️ www.evtolinnovation.com/sponsor
In July of 2021, this aircraft achieved what many thought impossible with today’s battery technology. It completed the longest, all-electric, vertical takeoff and landing flight. The Joby S4 is the result of more than 13 years of engineering and innovation. Joby Aviation's ambitious goal is to make affordable air travel between places like Houston and Austin, or Los Angeles and San Diego an everyday reality.
However, to be allowed to operate in urban areas, Joby had to develop an aircraft that is quieter than helicopters, as safe as commercial airliners, and cost-effective for mass adoption. More than 250 evtol companies worldwide are working to make Urban Air Mobility a reality, and Joby Aviation is the indisputable leader. In this video, I will explore the three key design elements that make the S4 technically impressive and unique. This is the engineering behind the Joby S4.
• Inside Joby’s Unicorn: Flight Tests and Patents Reveal New Details ➡️ evtol.news/news/inside-jobys-...
• JoeBen Bevirt Patents ➡️ patents.google.com/?inventor=...
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Chapters:
00:00 Joby Aviation
01:01 PCBWay.com
01:26 Joby S2 and S4
03:20 Joby Propeller Technology
04:50 Noise mitigation System
05:49 Tilt-Rotor Configuration
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
◼︎Related Video:
📺 The Technology behind KittyHawk HEAVISIDE eVTOL Aircraft 👉
• The Technology behind ...
📺 Why are Electric VTOL Aircraft more efficient than Electric Vehicles? 👉
• The reason why electri...
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Website: www.eVTOLinnovation.com
Contact me: ezequiel@evtolinnovation.com
💎 My Second Channel 💎
/ @evtolengineering
Follow me on Twitter 👉 / evtolinnovation
I hope you enjoy it!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
If you really enjoy my content, you're welcome to support me and my channel with a small donation via Stripe or Crypto. 🙏
Stripe: Buy me a coffee ☕️ [buy.stripe.com/4gw034g0A27Xdp...](buy.stripe.com/4gw034g0A27Xdp...)
Bitcoin Cash [BCH] 👉 1JRTiZg8TWWPajuue9EntM15q7c7TMZTuZ
Bitcoin [BTC] 👉 1JRTiZg8TWWPajuue9EntM15q7c7TMZTuZ
Ethereum [ETH] 👉 0x9041e9c8694a05b6c0c4c575cf719f1062f28e4f
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Sources:
➡️ www.jobyaviation.com/
➡️ / jobyaviation
➡️ • Flying 150+ Miles with...
➡️ • Building the Joby elec...
➡️ • Joby: All-Electric Flight
➡️ evtol.news/news/inside-jobys-...
➡️ www.fastcompany.com/90660149/...
➡️ patents.google.com/?inventor=...
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
✌️
#JobyAviation #JobyS4 #eVTOLinnovation
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
►FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
- Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
1)This video has no negative impact on the original works (It would actually be positive for them)
2)This video is also for teaching purposes.
3)It is transformative in nature.
4)I only used bits and pieces of videos to get the point across where necessary.
►NO INVESTMENT ADVICE DISCLAIMER
The content of this video is not investment advice and does not constitute any offer or solicitation to offer or recommendation of any investment product. It is for general purposes only and does not take into account your individual needs, investment objectives, and specific financial circumstances. Investment involves risk.

Пікірлер: 80

@eVTOLinnovation 2 жыл бұрын

You can now Sponsor my next eVTOL Innovation KZfaq video! Get your product, service, or content in front of an audience of 231,500 viewers per video [Average] Reserve a Sponsorship ➡️ www.evtolinnovation.com/sponsor 👇 TOP 8 most Advanced eVTOL projects 👇 - The Insane Engineering behind The Lilium Jet $LILM: ⚡️kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kNaUd7xj16rXfH0.html - Most Advanced eVTOL Propulsion System: Adaptive Ducted Fan: ⚡️kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pdh8ndWk3MnUqH0.html - The Outstanding Engineering behind Kitty Hawk's Heaviside: ⚡️kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nLJjYNCI29GndGg.html - The KEY aspects of Opener's BlackFly Innovative Design: ⚡️kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fLeGdLJ53ay9YIE.html - Jetson ONE. The first Personal eVTOL Aircraft that you can actually Buy: ⚡️kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gJOfhMiesKqrlo0.html - Why JoeBen Bevirt founder of Joby Aviation is leading the Electric Air Taxi race: ⚡️kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r9ZzobyH2NbPYJc.html - BlackFly, The "FLYING CAR" that you can afford to Buy!: ⚡️kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kLacY7yA0c_Vc3k.html - How Google's co-founder, Larry Page, is building a Flying Car Empire: ⚡️kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fNl5dLZiva-WlIU.html • Second channel | eVTOL interviews and short-form content: 🛩🔋kzfaq.info/love/OXyvN8Jp2uXslB-RqHrftw 🔋🛩 • My Twitter 👉 twitter.com/eVTOLinnovation • Contact me: 📧 ezequiel@evtolinnovation.com 📧

@VideoconferencingUSA 2 жыл бұрын

The amount of engineering going into advanced aviation is amazing.

@Cloxxki 2 жыл бұрын

It's the one thing is can to to MAYBE be allowed to operate such toys near any buildings of any kind. Propellors and batteries are both ANCIENT technology. Very first viable plane had a prop. To get anywhere on battery power, such a low energy solution, takes superlightweighting. I don't think it's about to make electric flying a big thing for decades to come. Too loud, too slow, low on energycapacity.

@VideoconferencingUSA Жыл бұрын

@Ale trip that is a good question, what do you think the reason is that this is yet to happen?

@VideoconferencingUSA Жыл бұрын

@Ale trip batteries seem to continue going down in price and up in power. Imagine where they will be in 10 or 20 years by looking at how far they have come in the last 10 or 20 years. We are in for some exciting times and crazy tech.

@Paiadakine 2 жыл бұрын

This vtol is the best practical design so far.

@skyisthelimit3255 2 жыл бұрын

I buy Joby every Friday , doing this untill 2024 when it’s full launch , then holding for 5 more years after that.

@timothy4538 8 ай бұрын

Yes bro, hold until 2030s when eVTOLs us expected to fully take off (as a form of transportation)

@nickkacures2304 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the the great video I keep thinking about how much fun this would be to get me to my cabin and how this will open up remote roadless areas for camping trips,fishing,and exploration

@inthebush96 2 жыл бұрын

I'm about a month away from getting my Commercial Pilot Certificate. The idea that this is the aviation world I'm coming into is so ridiculously exciting. I'd love to be a part of this in some way in the future, but even from the outside it's gonna be awesome to see what Joby and other companies can do with eVTOL

@frankyflowers Жыл бұрын

pilotless aircraft is exciting for you?

@inthebush96 Жыл бұрын

@@frankyflowers if it's ever something that happens that'll be really impressive and I'll totally be excited about it, but that's not what this video or my comment was about haha

@hunterhobson135 Жыл бұрын

@@frankyflowers Their not pilotless

@frankyflowers Жыл бұрын

@@hunterhobson135 they aren't able to lift the weight of a human and stay up 6 minutes.

@hunterhobson135 Жыл бұрын

@@frankyflowers I'm sorry you've been misinformed

@Mattys556 2 жыл бұрын

Caint wait for these!! Distance will not be far behind.

@nickkacures2304 2 жыл бұрын

Every time I watch a new episode I am blown away by the implications of this new opportunity in travel and how will it mesh with the electric vehicle disruption I hope you guys are watching Tony Seba and his Rethink X videos on the coming all electric electric economy

@brianb-p6586 3 ай бұрын

The long flight mentioned was impressive, compared to other battery-electric drones; however, in that flight the aircraft was not carrying a payload, or even a pilot. Joby calls it an "air taxi", but how useful is a taxi which can't carry any passengers... it's not a taxi at all.

@PatrickIanCheng Жыл бұрын

thank you

@ultrajd Жыл бұрын

With some modifications, these aircraft would be perfect for emergency response.

@grizzly3133 6 ай бұрын

Insane a very proper commemy

@jeromeavila3195 Жыл бұрын

Nice video

@user-vy1pe1sp3x 10 ай бұрын

JOBY S4 is a talent design,this vedio is fabulous,I want to konw where can i get JOBY S4's propeller design model? is it confidential?

@pauljamesk3526 2 жыл бұрын

My missis goes everywhere with me I need a two seater 😄😀

@evandrodaolio Жыл бұрын

I buy joby in alls pullbacks. I am a proud shareholder

@dominiquetournie6174 2 жыл бұрын

L'idéal serait de créer un champ magnétique autour de ce genre de véhicule, afin d'éviter les collisions.

@mohammaddoustyfard4822 Жыл бұрын

Good

@levinmaa711 2 жыл бұрын

Great Video! Really informative. However, it would have been even greater to have seen some numbers. What the decibel levels are, to be specific.

@chrisn7847 2 жыл бұрын

Under 65 decibels in takeoff and hover compared to helicopters 90-100 which is about 100 times quieter. In cruise, Joby's S4 does about 40 decibels.

@hasanchoudhury5401 2 жыл бұрын

JOBY future AirUber AirTesla? Long.

@garymcfadden2797 2 жыл бұрын

I sure hope they are best in this space as I recently bought 2,000 shares @ $5.30/share. FYI excellent video.

@frankyflowers 2 жыл бұрын

they never show it flying for more than a few seconds between edits on any video.

@eddie4050 2 жыл бұрын

@@frankyflowers I think they are working with hydrogen fuel cells on some of their models, if so the distance they can travel will be greater than just being battery powered.

@frankyflowers 2 жыл бұрын

@@eddie4050 why would you think that? they aren't. they only have one. they crashed one and had to make another one.

@matthewspry4217 2 жыл бұрын

JOBY ARE THE DADDY

@digestiveissue7710 2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, what an INSANE bigger than usual drone

@karlheifisch 2 жыл бұрын

I keep wondering: Joby or Lilium? What do you guys think?

@danielhart1524 2 жыл бұрын

Both are in both markets, UK and US. Both stocks are cheap now after being shorted, so it would be simple to buy both until one overtakes the other.

@LukeFG 2 жыл бұрын

Joby is the better company

@ThePepsg35 Жыл бұрын

I really dont like the perpelers there too exposed and is dangerous if it hits some birds in the air can be deadly, lilium is much safer and safety is key to success in a company.

@Ljw-low-ljw 2 жыл бұрын

This is the real ‘net zero’ future of aviation. Hydrogen powered airliners zooming businesspeople (at an affordable price for them) across the atlantic I think is a pipe dream.

@brian.louis107 4 ай бұрын

Why not develop a toroidal propeller? The decibel is slightly lower but the sound is a lower pitch 'hum' rather than the higher pitch snap of conventional blades.

@brianb-p6586 3 ай бұрын

The currently fashionable "toroidal" design does not allow for variable pitch, so it is unusable on this type of aircraft.

@cjswa6473 2 жыл бұрын

Lots of props... Which throw blades.. Stress points.. Etc. What's the material? Carbon fiber? Looks great right up to the point of complete failure

@skyloveglobalnelsonbarbonc8009 Жыл бұрын

Why holding two control

@Cloxxki 2 жыл бұрын

Fellow NERDS, please read: If VTOL ports are to be placed right by cities (yes please), why not incorporate advanced MagLev powered winch systems so do crafts get to SKIP the vertical phase? Just launch them! Large beam structures with a central fulcrum to optimize launch angle. Could be vertical. Aided by a larger water tank on board combined with a good air pressure vessel. After the initial MagLev launch, when the craft is truly airborne, the water tank is emptied (google: bottle rocket technology) very silently turning its initial mass into much desired thrust. The craft will be kept near maximum fuselange speed until the water runs out. Transition to horizontal flight at VERY significant altitude only and people on the ground barely heard the whole launch and take off. Can be done with water from a river just before hitting the sea, no need to use drinking water. Sea water would damage a lot of tech and flora and fauna on the ground.

@Cloxxki 2 жыл бұрын

Electric cars on sale now can do a standing quarter mile in 9 seconds and change. Well over 1G initially. So my not have a launch structure largely underground, which launches VTOLs at similar rate to speeds higher than the efficient cruise on battery powered rotary axes? You save battery, travel time and NOISE. Approach just needs to be away from cities, followed by a gravity powered taxi phase (slope). This could be made monorail powered to effect high speed taxi with mm precision. But only if your craft is also your city car, else, why bring it to the edge of the city at all?

@nickkacures2304 2 жыл бұрын

Wow I never thought of that I suppose it’s another thing for the market to determine .Would the G force be around what you get in a normal commercial jet flight

@FPVREVIEWS 2 жыл бұрын

yes, magnetic rail to launch. and to land, just fly it precisely into the magnetic rail, to generate energy while stopping. so that the energy is recovered along with the aircraft, and skip the VTOL.

@rossnolan7283 Жыл бұрын

@@Cloxxki What you describe is ATOL assisted Take Off and Landing -- the same general idea as an aircraft carrier/ glider winch launch/kite etc -- the take off GAINS energy not sapping the batteries and creating mayhem . Nice to see some critical thinking despite the hoopla.

@JoeyBlogs007 2 жыл бұрын

How does it fly without power ???

@brianb-p6586 3 ай бұрын

It doesn't. In any multi-rotor design a complete power failure ends the flight.

@Cloxxki 2 жыл бұрын

Why weren't heicopters huge when gas what cheap? Plenty of people can afford them, let alone when they'd be built in larger volume.

@petercitterio4467 2 жыл бұрын

@cloxxki gas prices aside, helicopters require lots of maintenance which means money and time. way more than fixed wing aircraft.

@c.a.nixiii4650 2 жыл бұрын

So it is basically a ALPHA prototype giant drone? Are there videos with ACTUAL people INSIDE piloting the craft? All flying shots show an empty cockpit.

@c.a.nixiii4650 2 жыл бұрын

If my battery runs out midflight can I crash into the top of a building that has a Heli-Charging station? Asking for a friend.

@Cloxxki 2 жыл бұрын

All this PUSH for electric flight, but we don't have a thrust device that is any more refined than an axe. VTOL adoption is furthermore VERY hypothetical. One needs to jump through ALL the helicopter hoops, and make it happen battery powered. It's cool and all, and I want a VTOL in my back garden (or better: under a hatch doubles as BBQ deck), but please put some effort into finding a better way to tun electric energy into thrust, OK?

@FPVREVIEWS 2 жыл бұрын

electric motors are often more than 90 percent efficient. Propellors are at least 70-80's percent efficient. the major issue is energy density of the batteries.

@DoctorWolfpack 2 жыл бұрын

I’m so glad and relieved that the Joby crash on 2/16/2022 was not mentioned in this video. Thank you very much for protecting the Joby brand 🙏🏼

@extremeencounter7458 2 жыл бұрын

Sarcasm?

@danielhart1524 2 жыл бұрын

Well if you want to bring up the crash to smudge the Joby name, how about you bring up the fact that Joby and the US military is jointly testing the craft for military applications and that the test craft was doing 275 mph (well above its recommended top speed for consumer flight) and flying through aggressive maneuvers near a California Army airfield at the time of the crash.

@1wolfkiller357 2 жыл бұрын

Testing the limits of the aircraft which is required for full FAA certification. Joby is the closest to full certification and will be the next Tesla in my opinion.

@johnprendergast1338 8 ай бұрын

I gave up on Ultra Lights years ago .. Fat people only on windy days ...

@seaplaneguy1 3 ай бұрын

The map shows Santa Monica airport, LAX, downtown Los Angeles, Hollywood and John Wayne airport. Hardly a wide coverage. As for the motor out, you need to balance it laterally by shutting down the opposite motor. The S2 had four motors across each side, making a loss of one main wing motor go to 75% which is valid. The S4 with only two motors each side makes it not valid. The folding props with cruise props on the s2 shows they don't understand the problem, just like the x-57 failed to understand. This Joby tech fails to get the aero correct. The correct solution alludes them... Their props are very expensive and did cause an in flight break up. Very poor design and very costly. Yes, different RPM...NASA did that on the x-57. Old idea. New combustion tech will allow $100,000 craft with 5 place for real air taxi.

@fbloggs 6 ай бұрын

Insane engineering? A huge part of the engineering effort that's being done is engineering of the press releases and messaging to give the impression that these companies have a viable product that's close to being certified. It isn't - certification is further away today than at the outset, now that the FAA has had a chance to see what's on offer regarding passenger safety in the event of total loss of thrust.

@chrisferguson1911 Жыл бұрын

It's a helicopter with 6 props...period.

@aileronhelicopters 2 жыл бұрын

What companies like Joby don't understand are the problems faced by Helicopter industry, electric power isn't the solution neither is many rotor blades, Before presenting an invention first tell us what problems is it solving, what advantages does it have over two seat existing helicopters Otherwise people will still not be interested... , but I wish them well.

@aileronhelicopters 2 жыл бұрын

@@lawrenceb3850 @Nick Kacures These are problems in the helicopter industry. 1_ Helicopter operating costs: _ Maintenance _ Fuel cost _ Inspection 2_ Range, Speed, Payloads compared to costs 3) Flight: Training Hovering 4) Mechanical problems: Tail Rotor strike/accidents Torque Engine failures Transmission failures Noise 5) safety *We have got solution for all these and in May were going to manufacture a helicopter that can fly for over 7 months without being refueled again or flying from UK to California and back without being refueled again at less than 2$ fuel cost per hour*

@aileronhelicopters 2 жыл бұрын

@@nickkacures2304 so making Joby will make everyone flying Airbus H125 and R44 ground them?? The maker of Joby wanted an electric multi rotor helicopter that can fly two passengers... But not a multi purpose Helicopter. People to buy that Helicopter are very few than if they made a multi purpose electric helicopter

@gpaull2 2 жыл бұрын

@@nickkacures2304 - what massive increase in battery energy density? Other than speculation and unfulfilled promises it’s been almost stagnant since the jump from nicad to lipo. RC hobbyists came up with the software and hardware to make multi rotor control possible, without the complexity of variable pitch blades. IMO this is the whole reason for the existence of this emerging industry.

@seaplaneguy1 3 ай бұрын

ALL, yes ALL, of these "eVTOLs" will go bankrupt. They all failed to understand the problem and the business model is silly in the extreme. New distributed combustion tech makes ALL EV tech (car, airplane, boats, houses) obsolete. It is 60% at pull power and 75% in cruise. 3 HP/LB at motor. EV motor + battery is 0.25 HP/LB... Active Drag Reduction (1/2) enabled by engines, not with EVs. The drag can be up to 8 times less than EV craft. Door to door is key. All eVTOLs cannot afford the weight to be roadable like this combustion tech can. 0 to 360 mph. 125 gallons gives 15,000 mile range at 120 mph, 3750 miles at 240 miles, 2400 miles at 300 mph, 1666 miles at 360 MPH. No EV can come close by 100:1. CO2 is 200 times less with RE fuels vs a 100% RE grid. On gasoline it is 3-4 times less CO2 than an EV. Just a friendly hint. Heads up. You will lose all investment into eVTOLs.

@brianb-p6586 3 ай бұрын

How much did Joby pay for this video? It was good, but certainly not objective.

@taterkaze9428 2 жыл бұрын

Another dumb idea. The phrase they're looking for is "energy density". I love all those exposed blades. I'm sure nothing can go wrong there. How many motors does it need to fly? What happens if one or two motors fail? Does it have a fire suppression system for the batteries? So tired of all this rich-toy hype.

@pelleban 2 жыл бұрын

I would say all those things you mention would also apply on a helicopter, with worse answers on each. As a pilot I would love to actually fly this myself, just for the joy of flying. Nothing wrong about dreaming of nice experiences, why does that bother you?

@HVM_fi 2 жыл бұрын

Maybe watch the video first before commenting...

@chrisn7847 2 жыл бұрын

The aircraft has multiple levels of redundancy for batteries failing and/or rotors failing. ‒ 6 propellors - can fly safely with the loss of any one propellor ‒ Each motor is redundant and powered by two separate inverters ‒ Each inverter is wired to a separate battery pack ‒ 4 isolated and redundant battery packs on board ‒ Motor continues to function if an inverter or pack fails ‒ Batteries in wing away from passengers

@ThePepsg35 Жыл бұрын

I really dont like this aircraft, I'm in lilium much safer and elegant for commercial use

@julieta203 11 ай бұрын

Lilium offers a much better platform

@andrewrafferty8084 10 ай бұрын

Idiot concept. Gas has 50 times the energy of a battery for the same weight. You can not build a practical ev aircraft carrying the weight of the batteries.