Facts Buff. But like you said, this coaching staff knows how to develop talent. My favorite thing you said is how they take talented players from other teams that under performed and bring out the best in their game. Solomon thomas, JFM, Quinton Jefferson are great examples. QUINCY WILLIAMS my favorite one!!!
@bigampple66622 ай бұрын
Gotta have the dudes so your scheme can scheme!
@mizzo92 ай бұрын
“Gotta have the dudes”. No doubt.
@TheDeanOfTheJets2 ай бұрын
Wholly agree, with one caveat. The D side of the ball has been HELLA good at player development. Huff, MC2, Quincy, JFM, the safety room, the backup LBs, the rolling cast at DT other than Quinnen speaks to a staff able to identify traits and coach up players. Only Sauce, CJ & Quinnen were really “blue chippers” to start with.
@lightxgrenade2 ай бұрын
I agree with everything you said. I'll be interested to see if there is that "regression" analysts keep saying about the defense being so good for a 3rd straight year or if having a functional offense makes them even more potent. Funny no one says that about the Ravens, Browns, 49ers and Cowboys with new DCs, just the Jets have to be on the lookout for this "regression"...
@jessejordache18692 ай бұрын
Regression analysis is the process of having a bunch of data points, say, the defensive production of a particular team for the last x years, and making a polynomial formula that fits all the data, so you can predict future trends. Volatility is basically how close to the average an individual instance is, over time. So if I have a 6 handicap, and it's made up of 100 consecutive games scoring 6, that's low volatility. If it ranges day-to-day between -2 and 14, that's high volatility. There, so now you don't need to put scare quotes around "regression". As for the media treating other team's defenses like they're etched in granite, but the Jets is written with gunpowder that's just been lit, you know that's how they do.
@lightxgrenade2 ай бұрын
@@jessejordache1869 I've studied statistics but thanks for paraphrasing google's definition of it. You want to give me a primer on proof that the beta coefficient is an unbiased estimator, R squared, or lurking variables too? Or instead of that, can you maybe admit that we're not looking at random samples? I think I'll keep the quotation marks since people that do this operate in a black box and don't put out how they arrived to that point so it can be scrutinized. This isn't an econometrics class or a study of congestion pricing put out for peer review. This is someone from PFF saying "well they're due for a regression" and leaving it at that. Thanks for playing Jesse, see you in the comment section next time.
@jessejordache18692 ай бұрын
@@lightxgrenade I've got a math degree, but statistics isn't my thing. The purpose of my post was because I didn't know what regression analysis was for the longest time, and kind of wished I did. Your critique ain't wrong -- "due for a regression" isn't a thing. Plus advanced stats are in a lot of cases the modern version of sliding an index card to a baseball announcer, so that he can point out that the current pitcher had grounded out the most switch hitters at that particular stadium in history. I believe that defense is more volatile than offense, RELATIVELY, because having a franchise QB, or not having one, is a big stabilizing factor that defense doesn't have. But most of this stuff is a case of insufficient sample size.
@lightxgrenade2 ай бұрын
@@jessejordache1869 The first week of my econometrics class, my professor showed us a quote by a famous statistician, George Box: All models are wrong, some are useful. The point was to not only concern yourself with if the model can depict a relationship reasonably accurately but if the methodology behind the model was appropriate. That always stuck with me. So many companies refuse to detail how they construct their models because they're in it for money and entertainment - that to me are inherent biases that kinda forces a fit for the data. Not to mention that human interpretation of a model's results can often be biased even if the model is fairly accurate. If you ever get a chance to read a paper on economic research note how cautious the writer is to make any concrete assumptions based on their findings. If you're interested in models and how blind faith in it can be dangerous, you might like looking into the Black-Scholes model. Partly developed by Fischer Black, one of the preeminent economists of the 20th century. It's a model for pricing options. By itself, it's a good model, but investors relied too heavily on it, not taking into account the limitations of the model and it played a significant role in the financial crisis of '08. It wasn't the main factor, but it was like adding fuel to an already out of control fire. And while I agree that in general, a defense can be more volatile year over year, I would argue that it's a lot less sensitive to one or two key players having a down year than an offense where if a QB or star receiver has a down year, it can alter the entire outlook for it because they're such a significant portion of an offense's success. If Quinnen Williams or Sauce Gardner got injured in game 1, would the defense drop off as badly as the offense did when Aaron Rodgers got injured?
@FBJayTee2 ай бұрын
I think our Defense is a combo of scheme and players. Id put it mostly on Saleh for installing this scheme, i put some of the success on Joe for drafting and signing the right players. And Brich is a great leader on the defense. I think its a combo of all 3. I think if Saleh were to leave, we wouldnt see a CRAZY drop off, but we might see a drop off. THe scheme is here and the pipeline of players seeems to be rolling.
@joshuamantock40372 ай бұрын
Saleh develops the scheme and scouting for defensive players. Brich enforces and executes the scheme. I want our offense to have an identity that our defense has. Fast, smart, and nasty
@FBJayTee2 ай бұрын
@@joshuamantock4037 I'm with ya, I hope our offense is out to punish fools, and I think we will. That Braelon Allen pick showed our identity, run first. Dice em up with Breece and wreck em with Allen. I'm excited!
@richr72152 ай бұрын
If Rex had this defense they'd have one at least one Super Bowl if not 2.
@jessejordache18692 ай бұрын
Or they do the game theory optimal version of never blitzing -- they blitz just enough so that the opposing offense can't rely on them not blitzing. Makes the o-line's job too easy if what you see is what you get, every time.
@jaybird81922 ай бұрын
Yes, I think Saleh's strength is developing defensive players, not necessarily scheme! Yes, there is scheme, and I don't want to dismiss his defensive knowledge, but it's a lot of developing which is a good thing! Now, if we can get someone who can develop QBs!!!
@kirkykirky2 ай бұрын
do people forget just how trash the defense was in Saleh's first year? literally the worst i've experienced in 26 years as a fan. his scheme works because Jets have a ton of talent