ماشاء اللہ۔ اللہ علم و عمل میں برکت عطا فرماے

شکریہ جناب جاوید احمد غامدی صاحب اللہ آپ کو صحت و سلامتی والی زندگی عطا فرمائے۔۔ هل يستوي العمى والبصير...

MashaAllah described very logically n correctly

اللہ غامدی صاحب کو اچھی جزا دے امین ۔

Excellent talk. JazakAllah khair Ghamdi Sb. He is the best scholar who logically explain the things.

ماشاءاللہ بہت زبردست

Great teacher sir ghamidy

Beautiful explanation

Excellent.... Hassan sahib.....plz ask more refined questions....

Excellent.

Very nice

Ghamidi sb is great ♥

JazakaAllah Salamat rahen Concept quite clear

Please release the next part. I’m still waiting for it

بہت شکریہ غامدی صاحب

kindly update part 4.... Mashallah great scholar

Iam waiting for part 4

Hassan kya khoob urdu bol letay hain.. Ghamidi sahab and Hassan,,aala combination.

بسيار عالي Ghamidi sahib is a great aalim

Ghamdi saheb, great man great source of knowledge....MashaAllah

Great scholar ghamdi shab!

Would you mind denying that the law of succession is absent in Islam. This was the reason for subsequent events experienced in the precession system erected by the Quresh. There were unending battles between the leaders and among the tribes. Briefly, mention of Jamal and safin battles suffices. Were these fought between muslims and infidels? Were not three caliphs murdered by muslims? Yes if the forces fighting with the family of the Prophet were not muslims and you accept it, then the question is withdrawn. They torturers and killers were carrying burden of old enemity and the tragedy of Karbala was a brutally cruel personifaction of their revenge against the Ahel-e- bayt before and after the departure of the Prophet Muhammad pbuh from the world. The tragedy of Karbala occurred in this perspective where none else but the Prophet's family (Ahele bait) was martyred mercilessly and unsparingly. Were not the omayyad tribes from Quresh? They were and tortured the family of the last Prophet Muhammad pbuh who brought the Last Word of Almighty Allah for the guidancce of mankind ,beginning from home. [ I am a Sunni by birth ] but neither blindfolded nor self-chained mentally, voluntarily pushing myself to the blind alley of prejudiced mindset. I can see this all myself without pulpitarians' narrative, or for that matter, their ego perversion, which keeps nurturing itself and retaining itself intact in the nursery of bias. No can't do it for being alerted by history and its canvas where an open mind can see how the family of the Prophet was not spared by the enemies of Islam apparently self- branded as muslims, for seizing power. You can't even see it? How! Where there was then the need for reading so much if one avoids telling the truth that too not for anybody's else but for the sake of humanity causes, spurred by the qualms of conscience. The first two caliphs were not from omayyad though but the entire Arab peninsula was occupied by them, in terms of holding important positions in the peninsula. Only the question of appointment of the central ruler of Medina was taken into consideration at Sakifa before honoring the Prophet, when leaving the world. I cannot say burial. then, naturally followed the withdrawal of Ansar from Caliphate or leadership claim. They Ansari tribal leaders knew that the entire Arab was already gone to the other people. You also refrained from discussing who were these other people influencing everything. However They are seen in the pages of history, I have already mentioned above. Bilal was not seen anywhere despite his sacrifices. He remained slave and ultimately ran to Iraq for safety. They were after him whom you call some other people without naming them. You have read khilafat -e-mulokiat and you know the author.

اگر سبق حاصل کرنا ہو تو سانحہ بنگلہ دیش کو دیکھ لیں۔ جب اکثریت کا فیصلہ تسلیم نہیں کیا گیا۔

Can't agree more till the events of becoming Ali (RA) as 4th Caliph I normally agree with almost each and everything of what Ghamidi sb has said in other lectures/discussions/videos etc, even the views of non coming of Esa (AS), Mehdi etc. And it is worth mentioning here as i am not from a particular sect. In general, I hardly come up with any questions from other videos etc, but by listening this, i have to come up with few questions. Now with the Karbala incident and especially before that the taking of leadership by Ali and then the treason from Muawiya, i have few questions. 0. How can the shura be made in those days and why they have to take in view and opinion from those states which were conquered? Like Iraq, Syria, Iran etc and lets say, if that even made, how could they travel so far and to take the opinion of people there to decide who to become the next calipah ? especially right after the shahdah of the Usman (RA). Then from the six people Umar (RA) thought as those who had the ability to lead/people will follow, and from last 2 remaining, it was Ali (RA) who was the most respected in that area and region? Wasn't that the fact? The center of power was Madinah, so how could they think of taking in account the things in Iran, Syria, Egypt etc where they had the governors, sent by the Caliph (and they were also originated from Makkah/Madinah (almost all of the governors by Prophet (AS), Abu Bakr (RA) & UMAR (RA) were originated from where? Especially during the time of Umar (RA) where Iran and Egypt were also under the rules, so even if the Sa'd Ibn-e-Waqas/Mughira.. (RA) etc could be sent as governor from the Madinah, so the power center was still Madinah, especially considering the communication and traveling problems in 7th Century AD. 1. For a time being if we say that Muawiya was right in his views, where do we place the action of Ayesha (RA) who was even in the same city, why did she come out against the caliph in-charge? Belonging to the same family tree, coming out against her son-in-law and thus opening a door against of treason. I found quite a difference in opinion of Ghamidi sb on that and why is he hesitant in saying wrong, A WRONG. Especially when he says that one cannot disagree with a Prophet (AS) but can be disagreed with anyone else. Why he does not apply the same principle here? 2. The formula, the saying, the order and the principle of AMR o SHURA BYNAHUM, which Ghamidi sb portray the most. Where was the in the doings of Muawiya ? Atleast, it was followed in the Madinah, where they elected Ali (RA) as Caliph but how can it give a right to a person sitting in Damascus a right to make a treason, when he was unaware of the whole incident. Again, lets say that for a time being that Muawya was misguided but where do Ghamidi sb. place the events after, like a deal with Hasan (RA) etc. Please do not see the events in exile, see them in the total of how the so called REVENGE taker (Muawya) dealt with the events after when he became the incharge (what violations did he make) 3. Again with the principle of AMR o SHURA BYNAHUM, how Muwaya got the right of changing the caliph to inheritance ? Doesn't that make him a person who was just hungry for the power, considering that they were from the tribe of those Quraishi people who was once the SARDARS in Makkah but the power table shifted from them to Bano Hashim in the form of Prophet (AS) and to his family. 4. Wasn't the action of Hussain (RA) in the last, and the decision to have a fight was like an authentication, that one has to stand up to stop the WRONG, when it was so obvious that he couldn't win but he made a principle of standing on the right, even if the people against you are so strong and in power. It was like that democratic principle has been abolished from the Islamic state/way of governance and I am against it and no one should ever say that even the grandson of Prophet (AS) was alive, still he remained quiet and silent thus approving the abolishing of the principle of AMR o SHURA BYNAHUM and accepting the heredity leadership in the state. And isn't it a fact that after Ali (RA), Muawya made and followed the same principle of inheritance power, even yet followed in the world, which was once stopped for almost 30 years of golden Islamic era? Wasn't that tragic? Will Ghamidi sb. still defend his actions? 5. I must finally say, it was not the actions of Yazid but the problem was created by Muwaya of destroying the system and thus dividing the Muslims at that time, from where they never remained united even for few years. And we could accept his regime, if that would have brought peace and prosperity or atleast the Islamic values, but they only saw the peak period of Islam, where there was money, prosperity and they had the same in the Makkah, and thus never became Muslim, unless Prophet (AS) conquered them and in order to save their lives, they turned. Thus, please also discuss Muawya's regime and what he had been doing, as not discussing it will never let the people understand the doings of Hussain (RA) and the karbala incident. I hope one can accept these saying as one can disagree with anyone except PROPHET (AS), as been widespread said by Ghamidi sb. May allah give all of us the power to say that right and i hope that interview taker will put these questions in front of such a wonderful islamic scoloar of his time. Jazakallah bilkhair

I believe when ghamdi sahib says muaaz bin jabal ... What he really wants to say is Saad bin muaaz ( chief of AWS who was shaheed ... While muaaz bin jabal died in 639

Sir plz plz upload part 4....

Is silsly k baqi lectures bhi pesh kijiye.. Or aik guzarish yeh hy k guftago k doran ghamdi sb agar apni kisi tehreer ya tareekh ki kisi cheez ya kisi bhi doosri cheez ka hawala dyty hain tw uska link video ki description me daal diya karein taa k us ki taraf ruju me asaani ho.. Bht shukriya

Waise to hum Israr Ahmad sahab k fan hain lekin aaj Ghamdi sahab ki izzat badh gayi. Ap new converts ko target kijiye tabhi badlaw ayega

Axcelnt you tube service

AoA . Hasan bhai pls compete the discussion n upload as soon as possible. We all are waiting ?

JazakAllah for so good clarification,Qasim from Bahrain

❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

My question is, when he says it was discussed and agreed b/w all the leaders. Where was Banu Hashim in those decisions? Specially in selection of first and second Khalifa selection.

Pasemanzar may be attached with the last meeting of prophet (pbup) at ghadeer

I can't find part 4 or further, is this the last one?

It would be better if it is in easy urdu or english.we Indians understand urdu with many hindi words

Kindly uplod other parts

Masha allah very nice explication of karbala event. and thanks janab ilyas bhai for silentaftre questions.

Can you share the link to Umar’s (RA) speech?

Next episode please...........

Please try to fix audio quality.

Kindly iska part 4 upload kren

The interviewer knows what Urdu is.

Very clear and informative

E momino zalimon ki taraf mat jhuko warna tumahara anjam qayamat mien jahannam unke sath Kar diya jayega soore hood Ki ayat ghamdi saheb dhyan Se pade is ayat ko

اس ساری گفتگو میں کربلا کہاں ہے؟

Can someone share path for the next part?

Salam. I need to understand Hadees No. 114, in Sahi Bukhari.... related to Haz. Umar RA, at the last moments of Nabi Kareem PBUH. May Allah bless u and us. Aameen

Next episode plz

غامدی صاحب سعد بن معاذ رضی اللہ عنہ کا نام لینا چاہتے تھے تو معاذ بن جبل رضی اللہ عنہ کا نام نکل گیا منہ سے ۔

Where is Kerbala in this long conversation?

next episode......... still waiting

Why hazrat Saad bin obaada ra did not put bait(بیت) on hand of hazrat Abu Bakr ra?

Khilafat qiyamat tak quresh men rahy gi,hades hy.. iski waja Hazrat Ibrahem a.s ki dua thi,ky mery bachy b imam hugy?To Allah ny farmaya haa magar jo zalam hu wo nai hugy,sura baqra k shuro men hy ye. To bat ye hy k qureshi asal mn Hazrat Ibrahem a.s ki ulad hen,ur qyamat tak imam in men sy hi hugu

Where is part 4...???

Second part???

Part 4???

امراہم بین شوری ھم۔۔ اکثریت کی رائے میں بنی ھاشم کو کیوں شامل نہ کیا گیا اور وہ nomination تھی۔ آپ اپنی رائے سے رجوع کریں۔

Ap ki bato me tajzye me tazad he,ap to khe rehe hein hz ali bi thik or muawya bi think or ider ap bata rehe ap huzor savs farma geye the k hukomat quresh me ho gi or isi bat asool k mutabik hz abobaker ko mukhalif ne bi man lya.muawya to quresh nei ta,jab muselman ki majlis ashora ne bi hz ali khalifa banaya,muawya ne junge ki muselman shaheed kya pir bi vo hz ali k baraber.jo muselman qatil hoe hz ali k sathi vo kya ap ko ghamdi sab duaein d rehe houngey

Karbala was not event but civil war among 2 rivals in Islam: Hashmite Vs Ummyade to gain power; and Hussein got defeated killed mercilessly by Islamic King Yazid.

Very nice jokes video hahhah

1. Hazrat Umar appointed six people from Quresh but at that time the empire was expanding and consist of Persia, Syria and Egypt also. So no consultation was made from those non Arab areas. 2. Umar said that these were the people from whom Rasool Allah was agreed for whole life, so taqwa, sabqat fil Islam, and contribution to the cause of Islam was in his mind, not only democracy. 3. Consensus was made on Usman, so he was chosen third caliph. 4. During the time of fourth caliph Ali, all over Islamic world including Persia, Yemen, Egypt, Iraq accepted except Mavia in Syria, so democracy was also there, but he rebelled. So what will you say? A person was elected traditionally, democratically, and most pious and capable of ruling at the time, but one group is rebelling against him on false excuses, so what can you say to these mutineers. Then after Ali, Mavia grabbed power without consultation and just by brute force, and he is still called khalifa.he should be merely called power grabber or highjacker who derailed the whole system of khilafat. And in the end his son Yazeed was the climax of despoticism and tyrannical rule . Please say the truth in this matter, and you didn't discuss the subject matter of Karbala.

واقعہ کربلا سیاسی جنگ تھی

Ghamdi sir is alright ..?? i mean he is looking ill ..

Hindoose object me ki aap ke bure ko aap bura nahi kehte Hamare kisi galat ko aap chilla Chilla kar kehte hain hamare Uper behad zulm ho raha hai Jawed saheb aapne bure ko bura Kehna sikhiye aane wali naslone Ke liye behatar honga warna Saree duniya aapki dushman Ho jayegee al qaida taliban Lashkar siphe sahaba real followe are of mavya Hindu ask me who tortures and Murdered mohammad a/s family Who kills many sahabi like Ammmar gaffari you muslim Islam ko hukumat hasil karne Ek naqab aaud liya jo qarbala Mien khul kar samne aagya The love soofees like khwaja By heart panjetane pak Your fore fathers become Muslim because of soofees Not because of so called Khalifas They are absulitly correct Innocent children of faujee kiillled By taliban real followers Of mavya and yazeed

اس سے اگلا حصہ نہیں ملا یعنی چوتھا حصہ؟؟؟؟

And no doubt after the death of the Prophet (ﷺ) we were informed that the Ansar disagreed with us and gathered in the shed of Bani Sa`da. `Ali and Zubair and whoever was with them, opposed us, while the emigrants gathered with Abu Bakr. Sahih Al Bukhari Hadith 6830 It was not Amrahum Shura Baynahun otherwise why Ali & Zubair disagreed with what happened in Saqifa

Kya Saad bin Obada (ra) ne Hazrat Abu Bakr k haath bait kar li thi?

اصل موضوع پر بات ہی نہیں ہوئی، یعنی واقعہ کربلا پر

Sakifa m H.Ali shamil nahi thy . Un ka intizar q nahi kia .

Aray bolna kya chahta ha

me hemesha ghamdi sb se agree kerta raha hun, chey wo nizul e esa ya imam mehdi ka mamla ho lekin jab banu umaya ki history aati hay, ghamdi sb shahid jan bujh k dandi mar jate hen,

"Agar Imran khan ki maut hojaye" 😅 PTI walo ko takleef hui hogi Zabardast aalim Deen ❤️

ghamidi sb ye bataiye aisi kiya jaldi thee ansar wa sahaba ko iqtidar ki k saqifa me jama ho gaye rasool pak k jasad khakhi ko shor kr, us k qafan dafan ka b intizar nhi kiya? meray ilm k mutabiq rasool pak k janazay me sirf 17 banday shamil thay baqi sab saqifa me jama howy iqtidar ki khatir is say andaza hota hai k kitna ye log rasool ko mantay thay our us say sachay thay....

Chalakiyaan😅😅. Balay o balay. Taqreer fir sunyo kitnay shakook paida kar gayee. Baina shurahum ka itlaq 😅 acha cover karnay ki koshish

To pher yazeed ke government be shi the ap ka video k mutabik ???

Politics of mavya followed By trump netanyahoo modi Ziaul haq aurangzed Todays politics not related To deene islam same character Destinity same

Qus moli anz piyaz Sawal yazead and hussian ra ki Jung ki bat ya sahudi pet cnt tell true

You are changing defination Of islam this is politics Not related to religeon

اور حضرت ابو بکر رض کو خلیفہ نامزد کرتے ہوئے کیا یمن عراق شام مکہ اور دیگر عرب کے مسلمانوں سے ان کی رائے لی گئی تھی کیا ؟ اگر نہیں تو پھر صرف سقیفہ بنی سعدہ میں موجود مُٹھی بھر مسلمانوں کی موجودگی ( جب کہ سقیفہ بنی سعدہ میں بھی اچھی خاصی دھینگا مشتی ہوئی سب لوگ وہاں بھی قائل نہیں تھے ) سے خلیفہ اول کی خلافت کو کیسے ساری امت پر تھوپا جا سکتا ہے دوسرا اسلام جیسا عالمگیر مذہب جس نے قیامت تک قائم رہنا ہے یہ کیوں کر ممکن ہوا کہ اس مذہب میں وراثت کا کوئی مسلمہ طریقہ کار ہی موجود نہیں کہ کیسے نبی ص کی جانشینی آگے منتقل ہوگی اور پھر کیسے ایک خلیفہ کے بعد دوسرا خلیفہ بِنا کسی باہمی جھگڑے اور اختلاف کے مسند خلافت تک پہنچے گا اور وراثت کا کوئی کرائیٹیریا بھی نہیں ہے کہ کہ کون خلیفہ بنے گا کون نہیں ۔ اتنا کمزور نظام کہ اللہ کے رسول ص کی آنکھ بند ہونے کے پچاس سال بعد ہی یزید جیسا شخص خلافت کی مسند تک پہنچ گیا اور اس نظام میں اتنی صلاحیت نہیں تھی کہ یزید جیسے کو روک سکے ایسے میں حسین ابن علی کو اس کا راستہ اپنے اور اپنی اولاد کے لہو سے روکنا پڑا ! کیا اسلام اتنا کمزور سیاسی ڈھانچہ رکھتا ہے اب آپ اپنی رائے کو اپنے انداز بیاں کے اسلوب کے ملمعہ میں لپیٹ کر چاہے ادھر پٹخیں یا ادھر پٹخیں اصلی سوال وہیں کھڑا ہے جو مجھ جیسی فکر رکھنے والے جوانوں کو آسیب بن کر ڈراتا رہے گا کہ اسلام جیسا غالب دین اپنے اندر ہی اتنا کمزور کے اپنے نام کی ریاست کی بقاء کے لیے ہی کوئی ایسا کارگر نسخہ کیمیا نا دے سکا کہ ایک خلیفہ کا انتخاب کن بنیادوں پر اور کیسے کیا جائے ؟ اور کون سے لوگ اس عہدے کے لیے موزوں ہیں اور کون نہیں ؟ جب میں مروان بن حکم جس کے باپ اور اس کو اللہ کے نبی ص نے مدینہ بدر کر دیا تھا ، ولید بن عقبہ کو جو کہ عقبہ کا بیٹا تھا جس کو اللہ کے نبی نے بدر کے قیدیوں میں سب کو معاف کر دیا اس کا سر اڑوایا کیونکہ یہی وہ شخص تھا جو رسول اللہ پر اوجڑیاں ڈالا کرتا تھا دوران نماز ، عمر بن العاص ، عاص بن وائل کا بیٹا جس نے اللہ کے نبی ص کو بے اولادی کا طعنہ دیا تھا اور اللہ نے اپنے حبیب کی تسئلی کے لیے سورہ کوثر اتار دیا جب ان تینوں کو مصر کوفہ اور مدینہ کا گورنر دیکھتا ہوں یعنی اللہ کے رسول ص اور اسلام کے بدترین دشمنوں کی اولادیں اسلام اور اسلامی ریاست کے کرتا دھرتا بن گئیں وہ بھی اللہ کے رسول ص کی وفات کے پندرہ بیس سال کے اندر اندر ، تو یقین جانیے سوال تو پھر بنتا ہے نا کہ یہ سب کیونکر ہو گیا ؟ کتنی آسانی سے یہ سب ہو گیا کربلا کا واقع تو ان سب حالات و واقعات کا منطقی انجام تھا کہ نظام شرفاء اور پرہیزگار لوگوں کے ہاتھ سے نکل کر بنو امیہ کے اوباشوں تک کیسے پہنچ گیا ؟ کیا اللہ نے اپنے دین کی سرفرازی کے لیے اتنے ناقص انتظامات کر رکھے تھے کہ دین اور ریاست دونوں ان حالات کو پہچ گئے کہ اسلام اور اللہ کے رسول ص کے بدترین دشمنوں سے مدد لینی پڑی دین کی کشتی پار لگانے کے لیے نبی ص کے دیں کو تمنا تھی سرفرازی کی حُسین سر نا کٹاتے تو اور کیا کرتے

Was this principle followed after 1st caliphate also? Shame on you talking as if you were yourself present there in sqifa.

بہت احترام کے ساتھ محترم غامدی صاحب اپنے ہاتھوں کو بچھو کے ڈنک کی طرح کیوں شکل دیتے ہیں؟

بنی سقیفہ میں بنی ہاشم کا بالکل کوئ کردار نہیں تھا۔ ان کو مجبور کیا گیا کہ اس فیصلہ کو مانیں۔ یہ بالکل قرانی طریقہ نہیں ہو سکتا۔ حضرت عمر کی خلافت کے معاملے میں غامدی صاحب کی دلیل انتہائ بودی لگتی ہے۔ چاروں خلفاء کرام کا طریقہ مختلف ہے اور کوئ بہی طریقہ قران سے ثابت نہیں اور اس کی شاید ضرورت بھی محسوس نہیں کی گئ اور اسے ایک دین سے ہٹ کر ایک خالص سیاسی معاملے کے طور پر حل کیا گیا۔

حضور صلی اللہ علیہ والہ وسلم خود انصار کو اھمیت دے رھے تھے۔اگر قریش کا ذکر ھو تو آپ ص نے خود قریش سے انتخاب کیوں نہیں کیا؟ اگر حضورص نے قریش کا زکر کیا تو پھر قرآن امروھم شورھو۔۔۔۔کی کیا اھمیت رھ گئی؟انصار کھاں کئے؟جمھوریت؟

He is trying to change the history, he knows history, word by word about three Khalifas but don’t know about Karbala!!even he never talk about fazail of mola Ali , Ali was the Molod e kabah,he did not open his eyes until prophet Mohammad came to see him ,Ali was the Fatah e kheber, Ali got the zolfaqar from Allah .......Ghamdi sb we can not accept ur history because we got the history from our 12 Imams!! Ghamdi ab u need to open ur eyes n accept the truth

رسول اللہ ص کی آنکھ بند ہوتے ہی پاور پلے شروع ہو گیا تھا واقعہ کرطاس و قلم ، لشکر اسامہ پر ، سقیفہ بنی سعدہ کی دھینگا مُشتی پر آپ کیوں گفتگو نہیں فرماتے ؟ جب آپ گفتگو فرما رہے ہی رہے ہیں تو پھر پوری گفتگو فرمائیے غدیر خم کے مقام پر نبی اکرم ص نے کیا خطبہ فرمایا ؟ غدیر میں کیا ہوا ؟ کیوں نہیں بتاتے لوگوں کو لوگوں کو حقیقت بتائیں

مخبوط الحواس انسان ھیں غامدی صاحب ہتہ نہیں انہیں سکالر کا درجہ کس نے دے دیا.. سیاست اور دین کو کیسے مکس کر کے خدا کے دینی نظام کی دھجیاں اُڑا رھا ھے یہ انسان دین صرف آپ کی ذاتی رائے کا نام نہیں ھے جناب!

All fabricated story. See lie no left from Bacar Ashab there was immam Ali (as)alive .so one lie is enough to cancel his all argument