The LARGEST Aircraft in the World: Airlander 10

Рет қаралды 52,668

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 135

@Interestingengineeringofficial 5 ай бұрын

⚙ Want to know more about the latest tech and innovations? Don’t Miss Out! *SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL* 👉bit.ly/SubscribeNowIE

@anhtien4578 Жыл бұрын

I don't know man but the aircraft is lookin' kinda THICC!

@whisterbin Жыл бұрын

hear me out

@jayjayjay021 2 ай бұрын

🤣🤣🤣

@spiderbite7849 8 ай бұрын

5:26 “Because the engines are located OUTSIDE the passenger compartment, the aircraft is very silent” great design choice. Engines inside the passenger compartment had its problems, like the deafening noise and spinning propellers

@MrPooPooJohn 4 ай бұрын

Man, I do NOT miss those days. Zero legroom, screaming babies and jet engines all in the same space. Somehow we endured. 😕

@RA-el6zj 19 күн бұрын

😂

@ZeeZee9 11 ай бұрын

Isn't helium in short supply on earth these days? I'm confused

@gazrobinson171 Жыл бұрын

Paint that thing green, you have a pretty convincing Thunderbird 2.

@c3aloha 10 ай бұрын

F A B

@22pcirish 5 ай бұрын

It would be doing a similar job!

@wobblemcdonald1411 11 ай бұрын

As long as there's an emergency exit and I have a parachute ready to deploy on standby you could count me in on a ride.

@JorgeAraujo97 Жыл бұрын

The engineer was listening to Sir Mix-a-Lot I see.

@rupertklyne2511 7 ай бұрын

The carrying weight has to be substantially higher to make this an efficient way to move freight.

@TreyMcDonaldAnimator 8 ай бұрын

This is really a feat of engineering, an extremely fascinating aircraft that is also eco-friendly. This could be the future if it could carry more passengers.

@peterdowney1492 5 ай бұрын

They are making an even bigger one. Airlander 50.

@MyRealName 2 ай бұрын

The problem is that it's very very slow. 130 km/h top speed..

@peterdowney1492 2 ай бұрын

@@MyRealName Compared to other airships? Or is it a general problem? Cheers.

@MyRealName 2 ай бұрын

@@peterdowney1492 I mean compared to airplanes, it's very slow. For moving cargo, it's limited to relatively light cargo. I struggle to find use for it, though it's would amazing as an airship that's good for luxury sightseeing trips and things like that. Unless I'm missing something, of course. Cheers!

@AgricultureTechUS Ай бұрын

loving the technical wording they're using.

@kingbudsalot3729 11 ай бұрын

Stormy days are going to be something.

@greedycapitalist8590 2 ай бұрын

No worse than a conventional plane.

@sherylbegby 9 ай бұрын

Fabulous tech. Sadly Helium supplies on earth are very short, and it's not a renewable resource.

@OviHentea Жыл бұрын

Description mentions speed @64kmph in 2016 - is it any better now? Also, how does it handle high winds, especially while close to ground? Does max altitude allow it to go above bad weather?

@alexb7641 9 ай бұрын

No, exactly like a 🎈, and no.

@sasmoyosasmiyarsi818 8 ай бұрын

RIP Mr.Munk..our dear friend..the original designer..

@dpaudits 11 ай бұрын

So... 100% no pollution but it has v8 diesel engines ?

@trwent 10 ай бұрын

When did they claim it was 100% no pollution?

@nidhinkn5980 Жыл бұрын

I draw picture of this accidentally in childhood. I name it skyship.

@TracyGieck 4 ай бұрын

I helped build this beast with the HAV guys. High guys!

@TGC_productions_studios_2K20 3 ай бұрын

Split it into two seprate ballons and then paint it black and we got an IRL version of phayze from BTD6

@seabassdarapper 11 ай бұрын

Where did they get the helium from?

@bradhuffjr777 11 ай бұрын

Radioactive Decay

@Bibi-hp8yl 4 ай бұрын

@@bradhuffjr777 Helium is getting short in supply

@carbugnov1952 4 ай бұрын

More adaptable as a ferry boat on air.

@GuardianOfThePeace 11 ай бұрын

Lightning and high winds would be an issue I'd say

@AkshayKumar-vg2pi 2 ай бұрын

@jackhandma1011 Жыл бұрын

It's so huge there's an entire bakery inside.

@ankit-456 Жыл бұрын

After dhruv rathee's video...🙋‍♂️🙋‍♂️

@facty99 Жыл бұрын

Me To

@zainulabideeniqbal4350 Жыл бұрын

Me 3

@LookAtme-dq3vm Жыл бұрын

Me 4

@Guide504 11 ай бұрын

This aircraft has several issues. 1, it's enormous for 100passengers. 2, it's slow 3, it's a hi end indulgence 4, in long claimed journeys it's control authority and wind resistance is limited, potentially making it an immobile hazard to other aircraft in integrated airspace. 5, clearly not a viable solution to low cost air travel. 6, helium is finite rare gas. Advantages are the views are fabulous.

@msre8800 11 ай бұрын

Exactamente. Acabo de enterarme por los medios de información que la aerolínea española AirNostrum ha pedido 20 de estas aeronaves, las cuales operarán a partir de 2026, algo que me parece a todas luces una fantasía sin sentido alguno.

@AuthorityCat 8 ай бұрын

1. passenger planes don't fly at 20,000 feet, I don't see how size is an issue 2. it's faster than maritime transport 3. what? 4. helicopters possess the same limitation 5. how do you know how expensive it is? 6. they can use hydrogen instead

@Guide504 8 ай бұрын

@@AuthorityCatdo more research especially regarding point's 1-6 your responses are not valid.

@Gofishefurwitz 3 ай бұрын

@@Guide504 Nothing is efficient or practical, until someone figures out how to make it so.

@glike2 Жыл бұрын

A perfect prototype for geoengineering with a little adaptation

@johnhouse2411 11 ай бұрын

Finally something new and exciting, great work keep it up. Don't let the fools stop your dreams😅

@Teh_moai Жыл бұрын

Sounds like bro is trying to sell this to me 💀

@jonahwiacek7987 11 ай бұрын

loving the technical wording theyre using. in other words its a GIANT BUTT full of helium.

@CTRLALTNUKE 3 ай бұрын

How I feel after a meal

@user-pw2xb4re8m Күн бұрын

Oh, the humanity...

@mickyjaguar2282 11 ай бұрын

Good for low cost cargo shipments

@fotofigures 9 ай бұрын

What about lightning strikes?

@SIC-SEMPER-TYRANNIS Жыл бұрын

Why Diesel instead of electric with solar panel skin?

@utkarshg.bharti9714 Жыл бұрын

Because the real world is run by facts, not fictitious activism.

@Teh_moai Жыл бұрын

@@utkarshg.bharti9714 the real world is run by old rich people

@TheLonelyLurker1995 Жыл бұрын

@@utkarshg.bharti9714 True. True.

@TankinatorFR Жыл бұрын

Basically, the company stated that they don't want to stack too many "new techs" at the same time. First, they do the airship, then, they propose an electrified version, and if there is enough progress on flexible photovoltaic cells, they will try to integrate them afterward. Actual solar panel aren't suited for this purpose.

@danc2014 9 ай бұрын

Until solar cell and batteries become lighter, adding cells and batteries to power the ship would reduce the passenger load to 10 and make a 2 day trip into 10.

@351410 Жыл бұрын

Very Cool! Also, background song and artist credit please. Thank You.

@larrymondello8475 9 ай бұрын

Thank you

@2ndavenuesw481 4 ай бұрын

10 tons is a quarter of the weight of a fully loaded semi truck. Not enough freight for something so elaborate to build. They're going to have to build them much, much bigger to be useful.

@BrowncoatGofAZ 4 ай бұрын

From what I understand, they’re going for very specific niches. Examples: 1 delivering cargo to areas with rough terrain with no high-weight roads and no serviceable runway. I don’t know how much cargo a Cessna bush plane can carry for example, but I’m betting this tops that. 2 high-endurance loitering in search and rescue situations.

@davynolan182 Жыл бұрын

One problem, helium.

@s7s7s7s7s7 Жыл бұрын

Why?

@davynolan182 Жыл бұрын

@@s7s7s7s7s7 Cost and the ever increasing scarcity. Hydrogen is the obvious choice, it’s lighter and cheaper, we’ll never run out. Safety is the issue but with clever engineering we could make it safe. However, the public and their representatives will veto it the minute someone brings up the Hindenburg disaster.

@travistreefrog8997 11 ай бұрын

Also deisel

@Bibi-hp8yl 4 ай бұрын

Helium is getting rare !!!

@mattmacknight3000 3 ай бұрын

@@travistreefrog8997you could swap that out eventually. But you will need helium to hydrogen because it’s an airship.

@wlnter.s 3 ай бұрын

but what is it for? why is it so big?

@yorki222 6 ай бұрын

Lots of air sickness!

@ceciliodecolongon5822 5 ай бұрын

They should lay flexible solar panel covering half of the roof. And instead of diesel engine, they install electric motors and batteries. It can hover in the atmosphere indefinitely.

@TyneBridge90 Жыл бұрын

Well I can tell you one thing for certain.. I will not, I repeat WILL NOT be traveling to Majorca of Ibiza in that thing !

@user-um9sl1kj6u Ай бұрын

Why not use Cyclorotors all around a dirigible?

@Br1cht Жыл бұрын

This is a sales pitch, nothing else.

@princejassal1 Жыл бұрын

Demotivation alert

@altarriq Жыл бұрын

glad to have pre ordered

@razrose2380 7 ай бұрын

Very informative although it could have done without the 1960s cinema music.

@briantcarroll4789 Жыл бұрын

Just waiting for it to pop

@Bak2Basics 5 ай бұрын

Airship covering is rated at 1200 lbs per linear INCH. .......not going to pop

@williamgriffin5297 8 ай бұрын

Looks like a huge blimp

@Jennyeq Жыл бұрын

Don't fly it too close to US airspace!

@Br1cht Жыл бұрын

Lol

@aaabbb6704 Жыл бұрын

小心支那间谍气球

@jb5music Жыл бұрын

The fossil fuel stooge Jasons will start shooting "spit wads" at it

@RA-el6zj 19 күн бұрын

If helium is in short supply, and hydrogen is too dangerous, why not use hot air, like an airballoon?

@Conn653 7 ай бұрын

Put carbon-fiber in the structure to lighten, yet strengthen, the craft. Many of the "new" solar power generation systems would easily turn this into a 'cost per hour' miser. Very economical to operate. Initial cost would be a major consideration. Great to see this back in the news 🙂

@markdennis6914 8 ай бұрын

Can only fly in calm weather?

@eljangoolak 7 ай бұрын

Wonder if the could cover the surface above it with thin layer flexible photovoltaics to increase the amount of time it could stay in the air since it has such a large surface area. Also i think an aeropike engine would work well for these... Another thought would be to optimize the topology of the interior aluminum frame with AI generative design to minimize weight

@sasmoyosasmiyarsi818 8 ай бұрын

This aircraft is very suitable for Indonesia..both for surveillance and tourism.purpose.. I am very much impressed! Congrats to Mr Tom Grundy..and his team!

@enere66 9 ай бұрын

I really miss her, man...

@lonewolfwildernesssurvival9443 8 ай бұрын

So back to blimps, seems we are going a little backwards

@respectrewards Жыл бұрын

Whos here after Dhruv Rathi's video

@ItsJLewis Жыл бұрын

That thang THICK 😏😏. Wait hold up 🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️

@kevinbryer2425 Жыл бұрын

As scary as it might be, the relative scarcity of helium will require a switch to hydrogen is they are ever to "take off".

@jamesmylife6578 Жыл бұрын

If they build it good enough that it probably won’t end up like the Hindenburg. The Hindenburg sister ship didn’t experience a similar fate because it was built overall better.

@wlnter.s 3 ай бұрын

why just why 🤣

@akinerbay6345 10 ай бұрын

old led zepplin!😊

@trwent 10 ай бұрын

Welcome to KZfaq comments, home of the Doubting Thomases!!

@jacepro2827 8 ай бұрын

Everything reminds me of her

@user-nl7ic4dl9s 5 ай бұрын

Best

@sharonlawson1968 3 ай бұрын

How can it be zero emissions with diesel engines?😊

@jb5music Жыл бұрын

Speed: 80 Knott's? Range?

@damian2256 8 ай бұрын

Why didn't noah just build an airlander

@bruceelliott6083 11 ай бұрын

Zeppelin

@donaldreed3210 5 ай бұрын

5 days in the air at a time. Be great when the zombies come.

@shiningalpha_ Жыл бұрын

Who came after dhruvs video

@jelte3754 Жыл бұрын

So why isn't it there yet?

@TankinatorFR Жыл бұрын

First delivery are planned for 2026, for the company AirNostrum. They will be used as a replacement for traditional plane on some intra-iberic airlines to reduce the environmental impact.

@dragonfly12 10 ай бұрын

Don’t let katniss everdeen anywhere near this

@sys9208 2 күн бұрын

Flying butt.

@MrJohnshopkins53 9 ай бұрын

How would you like to be on board caught in a super storm cell, put your head between your knees and kiss your behind goodbye... how long would it take to get from NY to LA ? 3 months as compared to 3 hrs by jet. hummm let me think???

@dimitrisdimitriou4747 7 ай бұрын

Pov: Caseoh

@daleduddridge6903 3 ай бұрын

And it crashes easy as well.

@Nice_GuyForUs Жыл бұрын

Me inside: WEEEEEEEEEE ok I’m bored let’s crash it Other person: it will just bounce Me: MORE FUN other person: NONONONO IM GOING TO GET SICK AAAAAAAAAAAH-

@Zakalwe-01 Жыл бұрын

I don’t see any point to this other than as a rich man’s play thing. Sky cruises for the rich. 10 tons is nothing. 👎

@jimhofoss9982 8 ай бұрын

sustainable? how many days out of a year is it possible to fly, without being blown off course? Yeah, that’s what I thought….not so sustainable….yet to do anything except look awesome. A blowup micro version would work better on the moon, no wind, less gravity, and super thin atmosphere. 🤫