⚙ Want to know more about the latest tech and innovations? Don’t Miss Out! *SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL* 👉bit.ly/SubscribeNowIE
@anhtien4578 Жыл бұрын
I don't know man but the aircraft is lookin' kinda THICC!
@whisterbin Жыл бұрын
hear me out
@jayjayjay0212 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@spiderbite78498 ай бұрын
5:26 “Because the engines are located OUTSIDE the passenger compartment, the aircraft is very silent” great design choice. Engines inside the passenger compartment had its problems, like the deafening noise and spinning propellers
@MrPooPooJohn4 ай бұрын
Man, I do NOT miss those days. Zero legroom, screaming babies and jet engines all in the same space. Somehow we endured. 😕
@RA-el6zj19 күн бұрын
😂
@ZeeZee911 ай бұрын
Isn't helium in short supply on earth these days? I'm confused
@gazrobinson171 Жыл бұрын
Paint that thing green, you have a pretty convincing Thunderbird 2.
@c3aloha10 ай бұрын
F A B
@22pcirish5 ай бұрын
It would be doing a similar job!
@wobblemcdonald141111 ай бұрын
As long as there's an emergency exit and I have a parachute ready to deploy on standby you could count me in on a ride.
@JorgeAraujo97 Жыл бұрын
The engineer was listening to Sir Mix-a-Lot I see.
@rupertklyne25117 ай бұрын
The carrying weight has to be substantially higher to make this an efficient way to move freight.
@TreyMcDonaldAnimator8 ай бұрын
This is really a feat of engineering, an extremely fascinating aircraft that is also eco-friendly. This could be the future if it could carry more passengers.
@peterdowney14925 ай бұрын
They are making an even bigger one. Airlander 50.
@MyRealName2 ай бұрын
The problem is that it's very very slow. 130 km/h top speed..
@peterdowney14922 ай бұрын
@@MyRealName Compared to other airships? Or is it a general problem? Cheers.
@MyRealName2 ай бұрын
@@peterdowney1492 I mean compared to airplanes, it's very slow. For moving cargo, it's limited to relatively light cargo. I struggle to find use for it, though it's would amazing as an airship that's good for luxury sightseeing trips and things like that. Unless I'm missing something, of course. Cheers!
@AgricultureTechUSАй бұрын
loving the technical wording they're using.
@kingbudsalot372911 ай бұрын
Stormy days are going to be something.
@greedycapitalist85902 ай бұрын
No worse than a conventional plane.
@sherylbegby9 ай бұрын
Fabulous tech. Sadly Helium supplies on earth are very short, and it's not a renewable resource.
@OviHentea Жыл бұрын
Description mentions speed @64kmph in 2016 - is it any better now? Also, how does it handle high winds, especially while close to ground? Does max altitude allow it to go above bad weather?
@alexb76419 ай бұрын
No, exactly like a 🎈, and no.
@sasmoyosasmiyarsi8188 ай бұрын
RIP Mr.Munk..our dear friend..the original designer..
@dpaudits11 ай бұрын
So... 100% no pollution but it has v8 diesel engines ?
@trwent10 ай бұрын
When did they claim it was 100% no pollution?
@nidhinkn5980 Жыл бұрын
I draw picture of this accidentally in childhood. I name it skyship.
@TracyGieck4 ай бұрын
I helped build this beast with the HAV guys. High guys!
@TGC_productions_studios_2K203 ай бұрын
Split it into two seprate ballons and then paint it black and we got an IRL version of phayze from BTD6
@seabassdarapper11 ай бұрын
Where did they get the helium from?
@bradhuffjr77711 ай бұрын
Radioactive Decay
@Bibi-hp8yl4 ай бұрын
@@bradhuffjr777 Helium is getting short in supply
@carbugnov19524 ай бұрын
More adaptable as a ferry boat on air.
@GuardianOfThePeace11 ай бұрын
Lightning and high winds would be an issue I'd say
@AkshayKumar-vg2pi2 ай бұрын
no
@jackhandma1011 Жыл бұрын
It's so huge there's an entire bakery inside.
@ankit-456 Жыл бұрын
After dhruv rathee's video...🙋♂️🙋♂️
@facty99 Жыл бұрын
Me To
@zainulabideeniqbal4350 Жыл бұрын
Me 3
@LookAtme-dq3vm Жыл бұрын
Me 4
@Guide50411 ай бұрын
This aircraft has several issues. 1, it's enormous for 100passengers. 2, it's slow 3, it's a hi end indulgence 4, in long claimed journeys it's control authority and wind resistance is limited, potentially making it an immobile hazard to other aircraft in integrated airspace. 5, clearly not a viable solution to low cost air travel. 6, helium is finite rare gas. Advantages are the views are fabulous.
@msre880011 ай бұрын
Exactamente. Acabo de enterarme por los medios de información que la aerolínea española AirNostrum ha pedido 20 de estas aeronaves, las cuales operarán a partir de 2026, algo que me parece a todas luces una fantasía sin sentido alguno.
@AuthorityCat8 ай бұрын
1. passenger planes don't fly at 20,000 feet, I don't see how size is an issue 2. it's faster than maritime transport 3. what? 4. helicopters possess the same limitation 5. how do you know how expensive it is? 6. they can use hydrogen instead
@Guide5048 ай бұрын
@@AuthorityCatdo more research especially regarding point's 1-6 your responses are not valid.
@Gofishefurwitz3 ай бұрын
@@Guide504 Nothing is efficient or practical, until someone figures out how to make it so.
@glike2 Жыл бұрын
A perfect prototype for geoengineering with a little adaptation
@johnhouse241111 ай бұрын
Finally something new and exciting, great work keep it up. Don't let the fools stop your dreams😅
@Teh_moai Жыл бұрын
Sounds like bro is trying to sell this to me 💀
@jonahwiacek798711 ай бұрын
loving the technical wording theyre using. in other words its a GIANT BUTT full of helium.
@CTRLALTNUKE3 ай бұрын
How I feel after a meal
@user-pw2xb4re8mКүн бұрын
Oh, the humanity...
@mickyjaguar228211 ай бұрын
Good for low cost cargo shipments
@fotofigures9 ай бұрын
What about lightning strikes?
@SIC-SEMPER-TYRANNIS Жыл бұрын
Why Diesel instead of electric with solar panel skin?
@utkarshg.bharti9714 Жыл бұрын
Because the real world is run by facts, not fictitious activism.
@Teh_moai Жыл бұрын
@@utkarshg.bharti9714 the real world is run by old rich people
@TheLonelyLurker1995 Жыл бұрын
@@utkarshg.bharti9714 True. True.
@TankinatorFR Жыл бұрын
Basically, the company stated that they don't want to stack too many "new techs" at the same time. First, they do the airship, then, they propose an electrified version, and if there is enough progress on flexible photovoltaic cells, they will try to integrate them afterward. Actual solar panel aren't suited for this purpose.
@danc20149 ай бұрын
Until solar cell and batteries become lighter, adding cells and batteries to power the ship would reduce the passenger load to 10 and make a 2 day trip into 10.
@351410 Жыл бұрын
Very Cool! Also, background song and artist credit please. Thank You.
@larrymondello84759 ай бұрын
Thank you
@2ndavenuesw4814 ай бұрын
10 tons is a quarter of the weight of a fully loaded semi truck. Not enough freight for something so elaborate to build. They're going to have to build them much, much bigger to be useful.
@BrowncoatGofAZ4 ай бұрын
From what I understand, they’re going for very specific niches. Examples: 1 delivering cargo to areas with rough terrain with no high-weight roads and no serviceable runway. I don’t know how much cargo a Cessna bush plane can carry for example, but I’m betting this tops that. 2 high-endurance loitering in search and rescue situations.
@davynolan182 Жыл бұрын
One problem, helium.
@s7s7s7s7s7 Жыл бұрын
Why?
@davynolan182 Жыл бұрын
@@s7s7s7s7s7 Cost and the ever increasing scarcity. Hydrogen is the obvious choice, it’s lighter and cheaper, we’ll never run out. Safety is the issue but with clever engineering we could make it safe. However, the public and their representatives will veto it the minute someone brings up the Hindenburg disaster.
@travistreefrog899711 ай бұрын
Also deisel
@Bibi-hp8yl4 ай бұрын
Helium is getting rare !!!
@mattmacknight30003 ай бұрын
@@travistreefrog8997you could swap that out eventually. But you will need helium to hydrogen because it’s an airship.
@wlnter.s3 ай бұрын
but what is it for? why is it so big?
@yorki2226 ай бұрын
Lots of air sickness!
@ceciliodecolongon58225 ай бұрын
They should lay flexible solar panel covering half of the roof. And instead of diesel engine, they install electric motors and batteries. It can hover in the atmosphere indefinitely.
@TyneBridge90 Жыл бұрын
Well I can tell you one thing for certain.. I will not, I repeat WILL NOT be traveling to Majorca of Ibiza in that thing !
@user-um9sl1kj6uАй бұрын
Why not use Cyclorotors all around a dirigible?
@Br1cht Жыл бұрын
This is a sales pitch, nothing else.
@princejassal1 Жыл бұрын
Demotivation alert
@altarriq Жыл бұрын
glad to have pre ordered
@razrose23807 ай бұрын
Very informative although it could have done without the 1960s cinema music.
@briantcarroll4789 Жыл бұрын
Just waiting for it to pop
@Bak2Basics5 ай бұрын
Airship covering is rated at 1200 lbs per linear INCH. .......not going to pop
@williamgriffin52978 ай бұрын
Looks like a huge blimp
@Jennyeq Жыл бұрын
Don't fly it too close to US airspace!
@Br1cht Жыл бұрын
Lol
@aaabbb6704 Жыл бұрын
小心支那间谍气球
@jb5music Жыл бұрын
The fossil fuel stooge Jasons will start shooting "spit wads" at it
@RA-el6zj19 күн бұрын
If helium is in short supply, and hydrogen is too dangerous, why not use hot air, like an airballoon?
@Conn6537 ай бұрын
Put carbon-fiber in the structure to lighten, yet strengthen, the craft. Many of the "new" solar power generation systems would easily turn this into a 'cost per hour' miser. Very economical to operate. Initial cost would be a major consideration. Great to see this back in the news 🙂
@markdennis69148 ай бұрын
Can only fly in calm weather?
@eljangoolak7 ай бұрын
Wonder if the could cover the surface above it with thin layer flexible photovoltaics to increase the amount of time it could stay in the air since it has such a large surface area. Also i think an aeropike engine would work well for these... Another thought would be to optimize the topology of the interior aluminum frame with AI generative design to minimize weight
@sasmoyosasmiyarsi8188 ай бұрын
This aircraft is very suitable for Indonesia..both for surveillance and tourism.purpose.. I am very much impressed! Congrats to Mr Tom Grundy..and his team!
@enere669 ай бұрын
I really miss her, man...
@lonewolfwildernesssurvival94438 ай бұрын
So back to blimps, seems we are going a little backwards
@respectrewards Жыл бұрын
Whos here after Dhruv Rathi's video
@ItsJLewis Жыл бұрын
That thang THICK 😏😏. Wait hold up 🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️
@kevinbryer2425 Жыл бұрын
As scary as it might be, the relative scarcity of helium will require a switch to hydrogen is they are ever to "take off".
@jamesmylife6578 Жыл бұрын
If they build it good enough that it probably won’t end up like the Hindenburg. The Hindenburg sister ship didn’t experience a similar fate because it was built overall better.
@wlnter.s3 ай бұрын
why just why 🤣
@akinerbay634510 ай бұрын
old led zepplin!😊
@trwent10 ай бұрын
Welcome to KZfaq comments, home of the Doubting Thomases!!
@jacepro28278 ай бұрын
Everything reminds me of her
@user-nl7ic4dl9s5 ай бұрын
Best
@sharonlawson19683 ай бұрын
How can it be zero emissions with diesel engines?😊
@jb5music Жыл бұрын
Speed: 80 Knott's? Range?
@damian22568 ай бұрын
Why didn't noah just build an airlander
@bruceelliott608311 ай бұрын
Zeppelin
@donaldreed32105 ай бұрын
5 days in the air at a time. Be great when the zombies come.
@shiningalpha_ Жыл бұрын
Who came after dhruvs video
@jelte3754 Жыл бұрын
So why isn't it there yet?
@TankinatorFR Жыл бұрын
First delivery are planned for 2026, for the company AirNostrum. They will be used as a replacement for traditional plane on some intra-iberic airlines to reduce the environmental impact.
@dragonfly1210 ай бұрын
Don’t let katniss everdeen anywhere near this
@sys92082 күн бұрын
Flying butt.
@MrJohnshopkins539 ай бұрын
How would you like to be on board caught in a super storm cell, put your head between your knees and kiss your behind goodbye... how long would it take to get from NY to LA ? 3 months as compared to 3 hrs by jet. hummm let me think???
@dimitrisdimitriou47477 ай бұрын
Pov: Caseoh
@daleduddridge69033 ай бұрын
And it crashes easy as well.
@Nice_GuyForUs Жыл бұрын
Me inside: WEEEEEEEEEE ok I’m bored let’s crash it Other person: it will just bounce Me: MORE FUN other person: NONONONO IM GOING TO GET SICK AAAAAAAAAAAH-
@Zakalwe-01 Жыл бұрын
I don’t see any point to this other than as a rich man’s play thing. Sky cruises for the rich. 10 tons is nothing. 👎
@jimhofoss99828 ай бұрын
sustainable? how many days out of a year is it possible to fly, without being blown off course? Yeah, that’s what I thought….not so sustainable….yet to do anything except look awesome. A blowup micro version would work better on the moon, no wind, less gravity, and super thin atmosphere. 🤫
@Kassiusday7 ай бұрын
Flying boat 🚤 🛥️ ⛴️ 😅😮
@brianlehman124411 ай бұрын
We’re going to school for engineering and pjs paying for it
@trwent10 ай бұрын
Pjs ?
@sidonio12311 ай бұрын
Too slow
@akinerbay634510 ай бұрын
ı think its a flying white elephant!! more complicated than a jet engine???diesel ,gas ,solar power etc too much diffrent techno!!🤔☹️