The Legendary 270 Move Game! Rybka vs Nakamura Game Analysis

Рет қаралды 333,073

4 жыл бұрын

Watch my live shows on Twitch ➡️ / gmhikaru
Play chess on Chess.com ➡️ www.chess.com/?ref_id=15448422
Support the channel ➡️ streamelements.com/gmhikaru/tip
Become a fan on Facebook ➡️ / gmhikaru
Follow me on Twitter ➡️ / gmhikaru
Find me on Chess.com ➡️ www.chess.com/member/hikaru

Пікірлер: 328

@lucasamado7129 4 жыл бұрын

Computer: Noooooo!!!! You can't keep shufling without doing anything. Naka: haha, so i went la la la la la laaa

@DylansLappalterCopium 4 жыл бұрын

*Haha I go lalala*

@amrqamhieh2797 4 жыл бұрын

HAAHAAHAHAHA

@senoraraton 4 жыл бұрын

Confirmed Nakamura is Data from star trek memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Sirna_Kolrami

@JenChenshuffler 4 жыл бұрын

Naka: haha bishop go brrrrr

@YehudiNimol 3 жыл бұрын

@@JenChenshuffler 5 bishops go skkrt skkrt

@coosoorlog 4 жыл бұрын

mating with 5 bishops is required technique for any grand master

@marossedik2130 3 жыл бұрын

I would like tutorial for beginners... Just in case I have 5 spare bishops, you know, could happen to anyone haha 😅

@danieleckert5008 3 жыл бұрын

you can mate with two bishops and a king

@electricman8545 3 жыл бұрын

Not liking this to not ruin the 666

@haydenarratoon4841 3 жыл бұрын

i prefer the seven knights checkmate to be honest

@Aelfraed26 3 жыл бұрын

Why did I first think of a diffetent type of mating and a different type of bishop?

@VociferousMallard 4 жыл бұрын

"The greatest game I ever played" 1 second in "Just kidding"

@petercavanaugh2434 4 жыл бұрын

Adderall Admiral I got so disappointed

@johnrubensaragi4125 4 жыл бұрын

Clickbait

@MrYoYoBoBoChaddyInsaneZhangII 4 жыл бұрын

John Ruben Saragi I mean it was a joke he made at the very beginning lol

@TheDoc377 4 жыл бұрын

Well, at least we cleared that up at the beginning of the video. He could just as easily have snuck that in at the end. Or not at all.

@Overlordsen 4 жыл бұрын

@@johnrubensaragi4125 yes it was clickbait. but nethertheless worth watching.

@mickeyvoges 4 жыл бұрын

"2008 so it wasn't actually that long ago" that was 11 years ago lol

@rxw5520 4 жыл бұрын

My sweet summer child

@Christoff070 4 жыл бұрын

Boo Like your life moves that fast that 2008 things still aren't that relevant :))

@THEGLORYRISING 4 жыл бұрын

2008 and 2019 are basically the same... guess i'm getting old... :(

@TheShadowblast123 4 жыл бұрын

"it was in the stone age... actually 2008 so it wasn't actually that long ago". In the context of everything he said, this makes sense

@MrYoYoBoBoChaddyInsaneZhangII 4 жыл бұрын

c j Unless you were 5 and had no idea what was going on. Though Obama was elected.

@jonas1015119 4 жыл бұрын

I like how he just bullies the computer at the end

@nortonalves3391 4 жыл бұрын

I can't attack a computer because he'll smoke me like a clown LMFAO

@Josef_1186 3 жыл бұрын

This was also 12 years ago, pre alpha zero and the like

@xa-1274 3 жыл бұрын

Josef P.W yeah rybka was the strongest engine back then

@choojunwyng8028 4 жыл бұрын

The "not attacking chess engines" advice was useful to me because everytime i found a great aggressive attacking move against an engine it would just calculate perfectly and stop it in an instant.

@joshuapowles6910 4 жыл бұрын

If it's letting you do it, it doesn't work

@Life-Sky 3 жыл бұрын

@@joshuapowles6910 "Oh a free pawn" - Famous last words.

@ertizakazi3303 3 жыл бұрын

Tzuyu is a fan of chess? Never knew

@joshuapowles6910 3 жыл бұрын

@M A completely closed position where you offer it a material advantage that it can't actually do anything with, can beat engines that rely on brute force calculation (Hikaru has demonstrated this and calls it the horizon effect). Even then you have to be a master to pull it off, and it only works sometimes

@joshuapowles6910 3 жыл бұрын

@M A draw is more likely, you just have to play flawless defense, and then it will be open to a repetition or draw offer in a theoretically equal position (even if the human is realistically very unlikely to win)

@XD-lj9ue 4 жыл бұрын

Hikaru: "6 bishops to mate with" Me: Huh.......

@justthomas2488 4 жыл бұрын

Yeah babay

@MotorKoiKarpfen 4 жыл бұрын

Sounds like christian summer camp

@kamiltrzcinski 4 жыл бұрын

@@MotorKoiKarpfen nice

@hauntinghaze5161 2 жыл бұрын

Would be better with 6 queens

@viktorsedlacek284 Жыл бұрын

@@MotorKoiKarpfen 💀💀💀

@wiadroman 4 жыл бұрын

Naka is a wizard, he can turn a horse into a golden goose.

@mrsalt548 4 жыл бұрын

hahhhhaaahahh

@christianflegel8133 4 жыл бұрын

Imaging being skilled enough to troll rybka😁

@xa-1274 3 жыл бұрын

Rybka was literally the strongest engine in 2008 when naka beat it. For reference deep blue won against Garry Kasparov when it had an estimated 2700 rating. Rybka had a 3300 rating when naka beat it.

@ian9toes 3 жыл бұрын

I guess it doesn’t matter how sophisticated a vault is if you have the key for it

@bc_7644 2 жыл бұрын

To be fair hikaru has anti engine tactics

@satranct0125 2 жыл бұрын

@@xa-1274 no Rybka 2962 elo

@Thorfinn517 Жыл бұрын

@@satranct0125 still more than any human till date .

@BenPinata 4 жыл бұрын

Just to clear up some stuff about AI: The computer is not necessarily looking a set amount of moves ahead, it's probably doing some sort of iterative deepening in its game tree, however, how far ahead it can calculate is dependent upon how well it can prune out bad paths. The pruning potential is limited by how well it can rate a given board state, so the trick is to get it into a board state where its heuristic evaluation is unreliable, hence the rooks vs bishop/knight situation. Because the heuristic was most likely designed to value those pieces more, it results in a suboptimal evaluation of those board states, and by extension, weak game tree pruning and it ends up having to calculate more paths than it needs to and can't reach as deep a depth. Chess AIs strive off positions with lots of trades and captures where they can very efficiently prune out bad paths because their heuristics are designed for exactly that, not super awkward locked board states where they're up material but can't actually do anything with the advantage. In Naka's game, it probably never bothered calculating the lines where he gave up his rooks because it never expected him to go down those paths because according to its heuristic Naka was way worse and had no reason to make those moves. Neural networks like Alpha Zero still use game trees, pruning, and all the other stuff that comes with it, but their key strength is derived from the fact that they don't use human designed heuristics. Instead, programs like Alpha develop their own heuristic by playing themselves millions of times over, and therefore they aren't limited to the quality of human designed heuristics that don't work as well in these unexpected board states. Alpha almost certainly wouldn't make the same mistakes this AI did because it wouldn't blindly evaluate rooks as better, despite that being true in 99% of games. Nobody hardcoded into Alpha that rooks are better than bishops and knights, it learned it from trial and error, and as a result it also learned when they're not better, so it makes far better moves in these unexpected positions. Neural networks are very much reminiscent of how the human brain works, and thereby don't fall victim to the kinds of miscalculations these other engines do. To explain how I would interpret the terms used: The contempt factor is the AI being mislead by bad board state evaluations like I mentioned before with the rooks, since the heuristic designates them as arbitrarily higher. The horizon effect is the inability to reach a reasonably deep search depth brought on in part by the contempt factor. The bad board evaluations make it really hard to sort which moves to look at first and prune bad lines in an efficient manner, so it has trouble reaching a reasonable depth. The pacman effect is not something I'm familiar with, but I'm certain an AI for pacman would be completely different from chess engines like these. It's probably just used as another term for the previously mentioned concepts. Just thought I'd write this up because I see some people trying to describe what's going on here while missing some of the fundamental concepts of these kinds of AI.

@bigmendi3444 4 жыл бұрын

Very long comment

@Marvolo360 4 жыл бұрын

Very informative and interesting comment

@TayTheDay 4 жыл бұрын

Very comment

@Jeremia1 4 жыл бұрын

Very long

@mcqueenchung 4 жыл бұрын

Very

@toodle361 4 жыл бұрын

I finally got it!! The only thing missing from my games is "la la la la la" Once I incorporate that I'll be as good as Naka

@alphabeta9425 4 жыл бұрын

*You are a genius my man, now sorry to say but i am gonna copy you*

@macleadg 4 жыл бұрын

Yash Baghel You need to master the head-bob, too, though.

@PhilipVels 4 жыл бұрын

This is too funny

@nunoalexandrepinto3808 4 жыл бұрын

The greatest game hikaru ever played was the "lalalalalaallalalalala" game

@bostonrules222 4 жыл бұрын

reference?

@petergriffin8767 4 жыл бұрын

bostonrules222 watch the video stupid

@StevenSenjaya 2 ай бұрын

@@bostonrules2224:38

@nicolasleonnarino3159 3 жыл бұрын

4:47 Those King moves were so careless that is actually hilarious xD

@quiquenet1756 4 жыл бұрын

7:36 when the physics teacher starts to explain something in class

@astroNexx 4 жыл бұрын

Thats what first day in engineering college feels like

@johnclever8813 3 жыл бұрын

@@astroNexx As a mathematician, engineers’ misuse of mathematics makes me sad.

@Spoon80085 3 жыл бұрын

Imagine playing a grandmaster and cheating using an engine, and they still win

@Tzizenorec 3 жыл бұрын

I think a human cheater _using_ an engine would get fed up and override the computer sometime during the "lalalala". Humans, even human cheaters, have this "impatience" factor that's sort of the opposite of the computer's "contempt" factor. Whether the impatient cheater would take the draw, rush straight to the losing move, or stop responding and lose on time, I'm not sure.

@geralddzimati72 17 күн бұрын

@@Tzizenorec Or Hikaru would straight up be a man, attack (not knowing it's an engine) and lose like a clown to the cheater.

@pbaylis1 3 жыл бұрын

lol. "What was that!?" he says trying to undo the spoiler he just leaked. 9:05

@josefn738 3 жыл бұрын

I thought it was bug lol i was like no way that has anything to do with the match no way nakamura beats a 3300 rated computer by trolling it with 5 bishops

@joshuaharney1181 4 жыл бұрын

i stalemated my opponent just by looking at those bishops

@Requinix17 4 жыл бұрын

He makes frequent references to "contempt factor", "pacman effect", and "horizon effect" but doesn't actually explain what they are. But I do know they "came into play" :)

@festusmaximus4111 4 жыл бұрын

contempt is where if the computer is up materiel it will never draw even if it cannot calculate anything other than a draw. The horizon effect is where the computer gives up materiel unnecessarily because it can only calculate X moves ahead. I.e. if I interpose a pawn then i lose my rook one move later which is better (the computer could only look a certain number of moves ahead, so it would deliberately waste material to avoid bad things happening inside those moves). I am unsure of the pac man effect, but I think it could be referring either to the way that a bishop can take many pawns one after another when the pawns are locked up against each other, or it might possibly refer to exploiting the engine causing the calculation tree to be too large so it doesn't all fit in memory, meaning the computer under-performs (early pac-man arcade cabinets didn't have enough memory for the game which would cause overflow errors when you got to a high level.) You could do this in an endgame or middle game where there's lots of moves that all kinda work so the computer has to calculate all of them, but you as a human can just see that only a couple are any good. I prefer the first explanation tbh. The basic strategy to beat a chess computer was to make very boring positions where everything kinda works so the computer has a hard time looking far ahead, then get yourself down materiel so the computer will never draw with you, then waste time so the computer has to sac materiel to avoid drawing, then you have to win with passed pawns and some minor pieces against a rook or two. These techniques don't work on modern engines nearly as well because they can just brute force calculate very far, so the horizon effect is much harder to exploit, but they still have some issues with contempt, as long as the loss for the computer comes after the limit of its calculation potential

@Entropy67 4 жыл бұрын

@@festusmaximus4111 they also don't work on modern engines anymore because they no longer look a set amount of moves ahead and calculate based off of those moves, instead they use neural networks and AI that learn how to play the game and play it well.

@malachyoneill8324 4 жыл бұрын

@@festusmaximus4111 yeah the PAC man effect is havin a bishop that can gobble all the openings pawns because they are on the same coloured squares. Kind of like PAC man eating yellow circles

@wooshifgay462 19 күн бұрын

@@Entropy67they never looked at a set amount of moves, quiescence search has been around for a long time. Its just that the position is so dense that the computer can’t prune it trough deep enough. NN would fare a bir better but that all depends on how much of these type of games has been introduced to it. Considering that computers learn to understand space as being very good(NN computers are excellent at using space) I imagine these types of games wouldn’t be played by it much, most NN training programs make it play some different games by making it play things it wouldn’t play to give it richer training, and also they make it play common openings so it gets better at them. Even if they made NN engines play the hippo I doubt they’d play it this way so its completely plausible their positional understanding would collapse here aswell.

@mixxed_nuts 4 жыл бұрын

I remember this game. Nakamura also did a hilarious game with 6 knights checkmate

@Psychosmurf5471 4 жыл бұрын

Still theory.

@haaey1197 3 жыл бұрын

Computer: Im up material Hikaru and his bishops:

@Kellestial 3 жыл бұрын

9:04 - 9:20 “Sorry about that” -Antonio Nakamura

@InfiniteUniverse88 4 жыл бұрын

Rybka became the best engine in 2005. When this game was played, Rybka was still the best engine. The era of Houdini hadn't begun yet.

@aayanansari700 4 жыл бұрын

Me: Trying to re-maneuver pieces in 15 moves Hikaru: that's not how it works, just sing along with me- lalalalala...

@ladjiel 3 жыл бұрын

So this game was taught us about chess influence, there was pac-man effect and horizon effect, but also agadmator effect at 9:18

@ambrose788 4 жыл бұрын

I could actually see this contempt bug being a cool plot point in science fiction.

@dhirajpallin2572 4 жыл бұрын

It reminds me of the bug in HAL 9000 that led to it trying to kill everyone on board. From what I read, basically what happened is that HAL 9000 was given two conflicting orders. Order 1 was that he must always tell the truth. Order 2 was that he must keep the mission secret from the crew. HAL calculated that if he killed the crew then he could preserve both orders. HAL also cheated in chess ;)

@viola308 4 жыл бұрын

@@dhirajpallin2572 genius! This gives a new perspective to the movie.

@manictiger 3 жыл бұрын

General: Hikaru, we need your expertise Hikaru: Uh, you sure you got the right guy? General: You beat an A.I., didn't you? Hikaru: Well, yeah, but... General: We're giving you 500 billion dollars worth of cybernetic upgrades. You will lead the world's armed forces against Skynet. You can use the forces however you see fit. We have estimated you will have to sacrifice roughly 500,000 to 1 million troops to figure out how Skynet thinks. Godspeed. You are humanity's last hope.

@shigurenikaido9588 4 жыл бұрын

Hikaru: *casually headbanging to LALALALA while exploiting bugs*

@Blaxpoon 4 жыл бұрын

If I understand well: Horizon effect : a close position that a human will take advantage of in the long term (impossible to calculate but a human can see that the opponent pieces will be stuck while his will be able to make an attack. Pac-man effect: the computer is up material in a drawish position so it does a breakthrough except this allows the human to have a winning endgame due to the pawn structure and the piece disposition. I believe none of these would affect a good chess neural network (and that is what deepmind claims to have with A0)

@jestes7 4 жыл бұрын

Yes but these effects don’t effect any chess engine today not just neural networks, as he stated about a dozen times in the video.. the “bugs” have been corrected

@pinkpartyhat4188 4 жыл бұрын

Horizon still applies to stockfish

@housemagicians 4 жыл бұрын

@@jestes7 Rightfully put "bugs" in quote because its really oversight and not a bug in the code lest it wouldn't actually be executed.

@unnamedchannel2202 4 жыл бұрын

@@housemagicians, I'd rather call it a bug. Since that is a cover term for all kinds of "computer misbehaviour". In this case it was a faulty design decision.

@dhirajpallin2572 4 жыл бұрын

Now we just have the Leela troll effect where it tries to checkmate in the slowest, dumbest, most annoying way possible. Although apparently they're going to fix this in the next version.

@davidhodgson4685 4 жыл бұрын

Great to have these excellent videos to watch from a Super Grand Master.

@georgeman2529 4 жыл бұрын

Its when in draw ish positions when AI is up an exchange, AI is not accepting a draw (50 moves rule) and trying to sacrifice smth to continue the game

@radar9561 3 жыл бұрын

I remember this game in 2008 and the computer evaluates the position like +1.5 or something and then pushes c4 to avoid a draw. They would usually set a contempt factor against a draw to 0.5 or 0.0 so if the computer had a 1.5 it would never allow a draw (by 50 move rule) and would make the only other legal move - c4.

@EGarrett01 4 жыл бұрын

He mentions the Pac-Man Effect several times but doesn't explain it and google turns up nothing.

@OmneAurumNon 4 жыл бұрын

I believe it refers to the fact that early engines valued material too highly. (ie. any time you offered them material they would gobble it up like pacman)

@traxler4855 4 жыл бұрын

I think he was referring to the end of the game where gets to gobble up the pawns.

@leerobbo92 4 жыл бұрын

"Domino Effect" is a better name for it. Computer gets to a position where it's materially winning, but can't see a way to win. So Hikaru just shuffles for as long as possible, and the computer eventually runs out of moves since repeating a position so many times will result in a draw (which the computer doesn't want, since it's up so much material). So at that point, it just gives up a pawn (it can't evaluate all the possible positions at that point, so it doesn't realise that it's a losing move: that's the Horizon Effect that Hikaru refers to), at which point the whole position just collapses.

@majesticwalrus3281 4 жыл бұрын

@@leerobbo92 tysm thats actually so smart

@salmaofinlandes6793 4 жыл бұрын

8:00 imagine if he did one more bracket

@niveshproag3761 4 жыл бұрын

hahahahhaha how did I not see that before.

@A_Swarm_of_Waspcrabs 4 жыл бұрын

Nice spot. Nc7-d5 would complete Exodia the Lallalalla One and automatically win the game.

@Murasame13 3 жыл бұрын

If you're trying to reference a swastika, it's actually not.. the left handle and the top handle are both elbowing towards each other, the swastika has all 4 arms elbowing in one direction like a fan or a windmill.

@anhohoang3207 4 жыл бұрын

Very nice of you Naka, your psychological trick worked! I've learned a lot from you

@chrysafisstamoudis9850 4 жыл бұрын

From the first time I saw this game I was instantly impressed! You played a brilliant game !!!

@jennybarrar5546 3 жыл бұрын

The moment when the computer can't keep up with Hikaru. The computer... STOPPPPPPPPPP ITTTTTTTTT. Hikaru," LALALALALALALA."

@DancinRain 4 жыл бұрын

2025: AI takes over the world HUMAN: secret wooden shield techniques

@phosht 4 жыл бұрын

DancinRain xqcL

@teteeheeted 3 жыл бұрын

This is the funniest showcase of a fortress I think I’ll ever see

@divyam5935 2 жыл бұрын

AI trying to take over the world Hooman: lalalalalalala *(checkmates casually)*

@SurenAghabekyan 4 жыл бұрын

aaaah come on Nakamura, your "most LEGENDARY" game was against Crafty Computer where you were "horsing around" with six knights)))

@benjamineyzaguirre9644 3 жыл бұрын

"wasnt actually that long ago" > more than 10 years ago

@inemanja 3 жыл бұрын

9:50 "So, six bishops to mate with" - Damn! Didn't expect those kinds of dirty orgy ideas from Hikaru... Too much man...

@GR4B0VZKY 4 жыл бұрын

Rybka mean fish D:

@daka5645 3 жыл бұрын

Imagine this man was about to beat the strongest engine at the time and he accidentally stalemates with 5 bishops on the board

@GLu-tb1pb 3 жыл бұрын

How to win stockfish: lalalalalala

@jootpepet 3 жыл бұрын

"Six bishops to mate with" -Nakamura 2019

@denny8360 4 жыл бұрын

last moments in human > machine history

@trenttapia2423 4 жыл бұрын

Your my favorite chess player. I play exactly like you... Except i lose every game.....

@TheDiensn 4 жыл бұрын

He BM'd the computer to assert human dominance.

@peters616 4 жыл бұрын

Was this the last time a GM was able to beat one of the top programs at the highest level?

@al-rajivbantuasbasir9801 3 жыл бұрын

Agadmator: capture capture capture Hikaru: shuffle shuffle shuffle Lol

@tamalbayaa1565 3 жыл бұрын

hahahahahahah

@lukaqemashvili4015 4 жыл бұрын

Love this guyyyy

@jimothycool 4 жыл бұрын

another level of dope

@luciano53688 4 жыл бұрын

A subtle bongcloud at 4:47

@scarletevans4474 3 жыл бұрын

Rybka clearly underestimated the long-term benefits of such King's development, that's an amazing example of Bongclouded Horizon Effect!

@andrewnainggolan635 Жыл бұрын

I am doing lalalalala but still lost everytime vs Rybka lol

@ldohlj1 4 жыл бұрын

I want agadmator to make a video on this.

@Sooyush 4 жыл бұрын

He took 15 minutes for a 6 move game of moist&XQc. So you demand a 11.25 hour video?!

@ldohlj1 4 жыл бұрын

@@Sooyush even better

@nighty9003 4 жыл бұрын

@@ldohlj1 lmfao

@user-gy9sd5vk2q 4 жыл бұрын

LEGENDARY!

@Loudjazz 3 жыл бұрын

shuffling pieces around in a closed position drives ribka crazy! 😁

@aaronwrecks3324 3 жыл бұрын

Legendary... I think most players wouldn't think to lock up the game in such a way hikaru did and it was two rooks vs a bishop and a knight. His level of understanding for thw fame is truly incredible. Im still waiting for the day you turn number 1 Naka, maybe if im lucky ill get ti lay you some day...

@kkaadsnekaads 4 жыл бұрын

End is hilarious!!! :D

@uditnaik9147 4 жыл бұрын

He bullied a computer😂😂

@sunritroykarmakar4406 4 жыл бұрын

gelfand vs nakamura analysis needed..this young nakamura player is pretty nice

@fridzfrezar4716 4 жыл бұрын

I guess that’s what we get from a super GM. explains everything extremely quick & it’s hard to keep up

@MrElviolero 4 жыл бұрын

Just trying to follow Naka's fast analysis...

@MsUncleKevin 4 жыл бұрын

10:30 tap start to skip cutscene.

@dylanmattheus1027 4 жыл бұрын

I would not want that a pgn

@dastardlydan4022 4 жыл бұрын

Apparently 2008 wasn’t that long ago.

@FilthyMick420 4 жыл бұрын

Hikaru is clogging the toilet

@tai_af 4 жыл бұрын

i hope he analize the one with the six knights

@ladydiana9108 4 жыл бұрын

I knew it ! I have always said the human (GM Hikaru) smarter than machine

@SurenAghabekyan 4 жыл бұрын

7:08 actually the computer played c4 in order to avoid draw (50 move rule)

@dannygjk 4 жыл бұрын

That's what he meant. His point was the computer would not accept a draw because it was up so much material.

@santanu5892 4 жыл бұрын

greatest weapon in chess is la la la la la la la

@koiiinu 4 жыл бұрын

no one: hikaru: so i went lalala laa bababa baaa

@h0axyboi486 3 жыл бұрын

Wtf this man is finding bugs and making the devs do patches for a thousand year old game...I mean...wuttttt

@mattk1358 2 ай бұрын

Humanities last stand and win vs the computer

@siddhantkotak5094 3 жыл бұрын

HIKARU is awesome

@Ruperstinsky1 4 жыл бұрын

Good luck in the Saint Louis chess 960 !

@user-bh5ss5dq2z 4 жыл бұрын

Did white hang its pawn on e3 at some point?I think black can capture it.

@UnlimitedRadioButNoSoap 2 жыл бұрын

random jump to the 5 bishop mate lmao

@whisper3856 4 жыл бұрын

5 bishops...damn

@caesaryumury5839 3 жыл бұрын

The flexing is real.

@Zeromkai 5 ай бұрын

Hikaru beat a 3045 Chess Bot. That a 21.11% chance for Hikaru to win and he did it.

@ronniebasak96 3 жыл бұрын

I searched it because i found it's reference on a book named Algorithms to live by

@nofanfelani6924 4 жыл бұрын

Still dont get it, whats the difference/relations between contempt, horizon and pacman effect??

@paulgoogol2652 4 жыл бұрын

horizon effect let the engine make bad moves just to avoid loss of material within its limited depth range. the pacman effect is easy to understand if you know how pros play it. they can control the movement of the ghosts knowing exactly how they react to your moves.

@miachen2635 4 жыл бұрын

more cowbell

@Grzegorz54321 4 жыл бұрын

It's time for Leela! I just kidding :D

@scroclan4523 4 жыл бұрын

BOUM G4 !!!

@ryanp8920 3 жыл бұрын

Does anyone know where I can find the game at the very start? Between alphazero and stock fish.

@TheGreatAndEpicMe 4 жыл бұрын

I don't even understand what the hell he was talking about. All I see is he bullied the computer.

@RedArremer 4 жыл бұрын

I seem to recall reviewing this game after it happened and determined the operator must have set the contempt to avoid drawing at all costs. When I ran it through default settings Rybka at the time, it KNEW the draw was coming and chose to accept it. So in essence, this wasn't a true exploit of standard computer contempt, but rather of operator changing the parameters to avoid the 50 move draw rule. For example the blundering pawn break on c4 it evaluated as losing on the spot, so quite obviously it knew it was a losing move.

@monkerud2108 3 жыл бұрын

You basically have to exhoust its repetitions and stuff, to play perfect against a computer often of player correctly there is no sac that doesnt lose the game, i’m not sure what the hardsolve is, but eventually you can often get a position that is favorable to either a pawn sack or the computer eventually plays stupidøy

@MaghoxFr 3 жыл бұрын

Shuffle it up lol

@cadentodor6507 3 жыл бұрын

Ur the only KZfaqr that clickbaits and then admits to it 5 seconds into the video lmao

@abtalks7468 3 жыл бұрын

What is the horizon effect and pakman effect?

@raydarable 3 жыл бұрын

What song was playing in the background at around the 1 minute mark?

@takasytuacja2633 3 жыл бұрын

Rybka in Polish is Fish like stockfish 😉

@0bada905 4 жыл бұрын

Hikaru smoked Rybka like a clown

@burt591 4 жыл бұрын

I love Naka's videos, but it's kinda annoying that he get's constantly interrupted by the chat

@lucagerza7372 4 жыл бұрын

burt591 I mean he can just ignore it it’s not chats fault that he reads it

@chiderakalaji7206 4 жыл бұрын

That's like saying, "I don't like it when he engages with the audience." Like dude, he's a streamer that just happens to put clips of his streams on KZfaq, not the other way around.

@okolenmi7511 Ай бұрын

Old Hikaru videos have a strange relaxing effect. Currently, his speech pattern is similar to being hit on the head with a hammer in comparsion.

@bharattrilok 3 жыл бұрын

My longest game in life , I mean the game which I played the most moves , I played a game with 240 moves !!!!!!!!!!! The Longest game I have ever played in my life till now !!!!!!!!!!!!!!