firendable indeed. Gm of contradictory rules, he is

Ha I made the same post a week ago. Now that I've seen yours from 6 months ago I deleted mine. And I gave yours a thumbs up. LOL

@Joël Cuerrier That trade is very suspicious, rawrrr

I do that exact strategy so often.

no spoken words have ever been truer :P

Then you clearly haven't donated enough

he also doesn't have much experience with critical thinking either.. the UI was very clear about what he was supposed to do

nah, I didn't get it the first time either

@@Gashdal how can u say something so stupid

@@Gashdal ok stockfish

"The hell is killcam?"

He said "How'd he resign so fast?"

"fine" gold if you ask me :)

Bro when people can get the even the decimal places and shit all right through their head it blows me away

Yo what the fuck?

Now fight

I died laughing at that lol

The key is to be higher rated than your opponent. -Jonathan Schrantz

Nice comment

You sound like Ben Finegold.

It's a busy century!

And we’re only 19 years in

When did he said that hahaha

Gotta remind him who his daddy is.

hahah

Nah you just need to find some people in person that can really challenge your ability. I changed where I worked and playing one particular Serbian dude over and over I probably went from a 1000 to a 1600 player over the course of a few months. You just have to keep playing and put chess-tempo on the home screen of your phone haha

I felt the same. He's thinking so far ahead that he sounds like a fk'n auctioneer & I'm over here still seeing what his son just played.

@@Theatheosis Lol I started playing chess in March and I'm 1751

u won't get anywhere lol if you can't reach at least ~2200 without learning openings then you don't have the raw talent to be able to compete at high lvl

Tristan L2 wait really?? Im like 1200 and i feel like i know the theory behind the openings

@@L2ggs most people start playing theoretical to a degree as they improve without actually studying theory. Some moves are just sensible. I don't know anyone who's at that rating who isn't playing theoretical at least to some degree.

@@victorpetrescu6586 My dad was a national junior champion. He had a terrible childhood, his family all devoted to petty crime pretty much, and extremely poor. He would spend most of his days in the library to get away from it all. The library had a chess-board and one day a really old man taught him the rules by playing against him. After a few days the old man was unable to win. Within 2 years he was the best kid in my country. He didn't read too many books about opening theory, mostly books by Alekhine so completely self-taught. He also has an extremely mathematical mind; it's worth noting that when he was drafted to the army in 1982, he had to do an IQ test and they almost made him re-take it because they couldn't believe his score. Then they relented I guess, because shortly after they told him that he'd make one hell of a general. My interest in chess is extremely casual, but my older brother has a 2400+ rating on lichess, he says our dad can still kick his ass (especially during the end-game) even though he stopped playing regularly many years ago. Makes me wonder how far he'd go if he never lost his passion for the game...

​@@K4inan''my interest is extremely casual'' *watching 1 and a half hour of blitz game on youtube*

I'm not attracted to old guys but his personality

Lmao I get less angry when I get elbowed in the face playing basketball then when I hang a piece

solid

I know this is SUPER SUPER old but... the position is winning for black because he can waste a move with his bishop after kf1 forcing kg2

Ben Finegold i found it for sure, but the point of the comment is if im lazy i just dont find it, but if youre lazy a bunch more might not D: and he seems like a cool guy from what ive seen