Just know that we really appreciate you, even though it might not seem like it sometimes. Keep it strong, Koss!

Koss is so kind editing for people with special needs 🙏 your charity is not unnoticed koss

Nemz, or as I like to call him, Orphan of Koss

Koss is so goated, he managed to edit all the old nemz streams to make up new content. he's even a better speedrunner than Nemz because he can actually get past Gundyr.

Hello, the meaning of this presentation is to outline different reforms to be made - to a certain area of land law. I will choose the land registration act 2002 as the area of land law I will propose reform for. I will identify the issues and problems with the current law in place. I will critique and analyze why it is in need of reform and propose reforms myself. I will then look at the strengths and or weaknesses of the proposed reform. The land registration act is a very relevant subject to look at, as it defines what rights, and / or interests a purchaser may or may not have, when buying registered or unregistered land. It also contains legislation that defines what interest are protected when titles are registered. It is a very important part of land law, and reforms to this area of land law could and would have an adverse effect if not handled sensitively. The issue that I see in the current state of the land registration act 2002, is that there is a registration gap when a transferrer and a transferee completed a disposition and registered the disposition to the land registry. Because of section 27(1) of the land registration act 2002, the disposition will only take an effect in equity and not in law during a period of waiting for registration. As stated in section 27(1), the disposition of a registered state or a registered charge is required to be completed by registration. It does not operate at law until the relevant registration requirements are met. Despite this, owner’s powers can enable any person that is entitled to be registered, to enter into valid transference of the land during this registration gap. The gap can be long, and it is said by multiple stakeholders that the gap is getting longer, rather than shortening, even with the advancement of technology and the ability of electoral payment of stamp duty land tax and electronic lodgment of land registry being a possibility.

Lil Bro’s Legion 💀

koss GIGACHAD nemz 🤓

Koss continuing to carry the Nemz Brand.

fank you koss

Koss, your content is the only reason i even open KZfaq.

Two releases back to back? Amazing work :D

This channel should be renamed to Koss38 at this point

Koss out here changing the timeline with those banger vids💀

Amazing work as always Koss!

Haven’t watched nemz for a while and the first thing I see is a nord sponsor. Radical

L for Sully.

nice video kos

I was about to watch this with my mom nearby and realized it's a nemz video.

Koss with another banger

Great video koss

nemz is the only british person i respect

That was good. Thanks Koss :)

good one koss, love you

The meaning of this presentation

Hello, the meaning of this presentation is to outline different reforms to be made to a certain area of land lore. I will choose the Land Registration Act 2002 as the area that I will propose reform for 🤓

Fank you

Koss every time you produce one of this losers vids it makes my day so much better 😘

Imagine a streamer who's more dedicated to their alt then their main

Thank you Koss

Good one Koss!!! 😍😍😍😍😍

Nemz has the greatest Laugh

we miss you koss ❤️

Rest in peace sully, his ass pain is gone now

fank yew for being so funny and great 🤓

Koss

Taking a break already? PepeLaugh

koss is loyal

Take a look at this new game "farthest frontier". Will finally be a good stream

you've been gone for a month did another pet die?

I watched like 80 or 100 of Nemzes Speedruns and i never Saw him die at that 6:02 in the video

🤓☝️

Wheres the world record?

W koss

🤓

does this guy ever even stream, i've never seen him online ever

nemzly??

4:44

nemz unban me from that server bro it’s been a year

L

You need to learn how to lie convincingly

nemzy where are the videos, has koss quit after years of abuse from his employer?

Hello, the meaning of this presentation is to outline different reforms to be made - to a certain area of land law. I will choose the land registration act 2002 as the area of land law I will propose reform for. I will identify the issues and problems with the current law in place. I will critique and analyze why it is in need of reform and propose reforms myself. I will then look at the strengths and or weaknesses of the proposed reform. The land registration act is a very relevant subject to look at, as it defines what rights, and / or interests a purchaser may or may not have, when buying registered or unregistered land. It also contains legislation that defines what interest are protected when titles are registered. It is a very important part of land law, and reforms to this area of land law could and would have an adverse effect if not handled sensitively. The issue that I see in the current state of the land registration act 2002, is that there is a registration gap when a transferrer and a transferee completed a disposition and registered the disposition to the land registry. Because of section 27(1) of the land registration act 2002, the disposition will only take an effect in equity and not in law during a period of waiting for registration. As stated in section 27(1), the disposition of a registered state or a registered charge is required to be completed by registration. It does not operate at law until the relevant registration requirements are met. Despite this, owner’s powers can enable any person that is entitled to be registered, to enter into valid transference of the land during this registration gap. The gap can be long, and it is said by multiple stakeholders that the gap is getting longer, rather than shortening, even with the advancement of technology and the ability of electoral payment of stamp duty land tax and electronic lodgment of land registry being a possibility. 🤓

Hello, the meaning of this presentation is to outline different reforms to be made - to a certain area of land law. I will choose the land registration act 2002 as the area of land law I will propose reform for. I will identify the issues and problems with the current law in place. I will critique and analyze why it is in need of reform and propose reforms myself. I will then look at the strengths and or weaknesses of the proposed reform. The land registration act is a very relevant subject to look at, as it defines what rights, and / or interests a purchaser may or may not have, when buying registered or unregistered land. It also contains legislation that defines what interest are protected when titles are registered. It is a very important part of land law, and reforms to this area of land law could and would have an adverse effect if not handled sensitively. The issue that I see in the current state of the land registration act 2002, is that there is a registration gap when a transferrer and a transferee completed a disposition and registered the disposition to the land registry. Because of section 27(1) of the land registration act 2002, the disposition will only take an effect in equity and not in law during a period of waiting for registration. As stated in section 27(1), the disposition of a registered state or a registered charge is required to be completed by registration. It does not operate at law until the relevant registration requirements are met. Despite this, owner’s powers can enable any person that is entitled to be registered, to enter into valid transference of the land during this registration gap. The gap can be long, and it is said by multiple stakeholders that the gap is getting longer, rather than shortening, even with the advancement of technology and the ability of electoral payment of stamp duty land tax and electronic lodgment of land registry being a possibility.

Hello, the meaning of this presentation is to outline different reforms to be made - to a certain area of land law. I will choose the land registration act 2002 as the area of land law I will propose reform for. I will identify the issues and problems with the current law in place. I will critique and analyze why it is in need of reform and propose reforms myself. I will then look at the strengths and or weaknesses of the proposed reform. The land registration act is a very relevant subject to look at, as it defines what rights, and / or interests a purchaser may or may not have, when buying registered or unregistered land. It also contains legislation that defines what interest are protected when titles are registered. It is a very important part of land law, and reforms to this area of land law could and would have an adverse effect if not handled sensitively. The issue that I see in the current state of the land registration act 2002, is that there is a registration gap when a transferrer and a transferee completed a disposition and registered the disposition to the land registry. Because of section 27(1) of the land registration act 2002, the disposition will only take an effect in equity and not in law during a period of waiting for registration. As stated in section 27(1), the disposition of a registered state or a registered charge is required to be completed by registration. It does not operate at law until the relevant registration requirements are met. Despite this, owner’s powers can enable any person that is entitled to be registered, to enter into valid transference of the land during this registration gap. The gap can be long, and it is said by multiple stakeholders that the gap is getting longer, rather than shortening, even with the advancement of technology and the ability of electoral payment of stamp duty land tax and electronic lodgment of land registry being a possibility. Registration can take up to six months and an owner may try to enforce a positive covenant in this time period. The reason for a possibility of a six-month period, is that the land registry has to deal with multiple regulations and there are two waiting registrations, and that there are two waiting points in the registration gap: The gap between the completion of the disposition and applying to land registration. The second wait is the period of time of the application being submitted by the land registry and it being completed and then backdated. Further issues are found in the case of Brown and Root Technology Ltd versus Sun Alliance and London Assurance Co Ltd in 1996. In this case, the tenant and the registered proprietor of a standing 25-year lease was then transferred to a new tenant. The tenant that was leaving, exercised his right to terminate the lease. The court of appeal held that the lease had not been registered by the time of passing to the other tenant. The landlord and tenants act 1995 may have fixed these issues, but it has not been tested yet if registered proprietors can serve a valid break notice and if the new law covers break clauses. In light of these issues, I have identified the land registration act 2002. The reform I propose is to change when legal title passes from the transferer to the transferee to the date of the transfer from the date that it gets registered. I believe this would avoid for the need of a trust to be created between the transferer and the transferee and would avoid further avoid legal problems that arises when that trust is broken. There would be no waiting period for the transferer after the transposition disposition has been completed and his owner’s rights would be available to him after the transfer rather than after the registration has processed the application. The reform would also allow for the land registry to focus on the development of an online process, that could shorten the overall process of receiving applications rather than relying on deeds and contracts to be sent to them physically. There are also obvious weaknesses to this proposal reform; one being that it will not solve a significant part of the problems: the problems of registration taking a long time for complicated issues to be registered. The reform would also undermine the current registry policy, and could offer the possibility of owners choosing not to register as they would not be in a rush to become the owner by application. Owners would also find it hard to win for certain rights if their name is not on the registry. It would cause further confusion in the legal process. Multiple sections of the statue would also have to be amended, because of the proposed reform, such as section 24 of the land registration act 2002, which states that a person is entitled to exercise owner’s rights in relation to a registered estate or charge if he is a registered proprietor or entitled to be registered as the proprietor. Sections like this would be amended throughout because of this reform. In conclusion of this, I believe that this reform would offer clarity for owners and stakeholders and when they are entitled to their owner’s rights exclusively, rather than jointly with the previous owner. The registration gap would also be non-existent, allowing no confusion of legal rights. Despite this, I think the weaknesses mentioned above are overbearing and a reform would cause more problems than it solves. The next step of a better solution in this area, I believe cannot be found in legal reform. In technological investment and improvement towards the land registry which would offer the ability to have a complete online conveyance. This, I believe, is the next step in this area of the land registration act 2002. If the proposed reform did not provide a solution to the current issues, another small but important issue that I’ve identified in the land registration act 2002, is that compulsory registration is triggered by certain effects, such as transferring the property, or forcing it to be registered to the land registry. I believe that this causes inconsistency in the importance of registering a property in the UK. The majority of land in England and Wales is now registered, however a hundred percent has not yet been registered as millions of properties had to be registered. The registering of these properties had to be phased in by the land registration act 1925 and 2002. The fact that not every property is registered there, has to be legislation to cover the rights and interests of those unregistered properties. Important cases like Midland Bank Trust Ltd versus Green, and Kingsworth Finance Ltd versus Tizard 1986 have been formed due to unregistered land. In Midland Bank Trust versus Green 1981 a farmer granted an option to his son to purchase his farm. The family had a disagreement and the husband sold the farm, which he said was worth 40000 pounds to his wife, for five hundred pounds. This overrides the option, as it was not registered, as it should have been, under the land charges act 1972. This case shows how things can happen in bad faith due to unregistered land. In Kingsworth Finance Limited vs Tizard 1986, Mr. Tizard was the sole registered proprietor of some land, upon which he lived with his wife. They fell out (like Nemz and Kastaclysm) and mortgaged the house and then defaulted. Miss Tizard had contributed to the purchase price of the property. The bank could not obtain possession of the house, due to an equitable interest in the house, overridden by her actual occupation. These two cases are very important on unregistered land. The issue of overreaching would also have less cases to deal with, as it would only apply to registered land rather than registered and unregistered. My proposed reform for these issues, would be to amend the land registration act 2002, default registry of all property in the UK by 2020 or receive a fine when forced to registered after a triggered event. This proposed reform would help alleviate the cases that are complicated when dealing with unregistered land, and to help stop injustice by bad faith as shown in a leading case in that area. The reform would help to solidify the importance of registering a property in the UK, and would allow the land registry to have access to every property in the UK. The statute land charges act 1972 would also be able to become shorter and more precise, and the law found in that statute the protect unregistered owners and equitable interests and provide clarity that is lacking at times. The negatives of this reform, is that it may be overreaching on the possibility to register every property in the UK. It may even be impossible to know if every property is registered after 2020. The fine proposed, may provide an incentive to register a property, however it may stop owners from registering after 2020 to avoid the fine. In conclusion of this proposal, I believe this is a needed reform to solidify the importance of registering land in the UK. It would also allow the land registry to have a full database of land in the UK, so there is no confusion in ownership of property. The weaknesses may make this reform unreasonable and / or unrealistic to be used in the UK legislation, however I believe the proposed reform should and could have a positive change to the land registration act 2002. In reflection in of both my proposals, I believe both have a place in the UK legislation. If the appropriate changes needed come to fruition, and the expected weaknesses can be dealt with, with the support of professional consultants’ revision. Thank you.

Hello, the meaning of this presentation is to outline different reforms to be made - to a certain area of land law. I will choose the land registration act 2002 as the area of land law I will propose reform for. I will identify the issues and problems with the current law in place. I will critique and analyze why it is in need of reform and propose reforms myself. I will then look at the strengths and or weaknesses of the proposed reform. The land registration act is a very relevant subject to look at, as it defines what rights, and / or interests a purchaser may or may not have, when buying registered or unregistered land. It also contains legislation that defines what interest are protected when titles are registered. It is a very important part of land law, and reforms to this area of land law could and would have an adverse effect if not handled sensitively. The issue that I see in the current state of the land registration act 2002, is that there is a registration gap when a transferrer and a transferee completed a disposition and registered the disposition to the land registry. Because of section 27(1) of the land registration act 2002, the disposition will only take an effect in equity and not in law during a period of waiting for registration. As stated in section 27(1), the disposition of a registered state or a registered charge is required to be completed by registration. It does not operate at law until the relevant registration requirements are met. Despite this, owner’s powers can enable any person that is entitled to be registered, to enter into valid transference of the land during this registration gap. The gap can be long, and it is said by multiple stakeholders that the gap is getting longer, rather than shortening, even with the advancement of technology and the ability of electoral payment of stamp duty land tax and electronic lodgment of land registry being a possibility.

Hello, the meaning of this presentation is to outline different reforms to be made - to a certain area of land law. I will choose the land registration act 2002 as the area of land law I will propose reform for. I will identify the issues and problems with the current law in place. I will critique and analyze why it is in need of reform and propose reforms myself. I will then look at the strengths and or weaknesses of the proposed reform. The land registration act is a very relevant subject to look at, as it defines what rights, and / or interests a purchaser may or may not have, when buying registered or unregistered land. It also contains legislation that defines what interest are protected when titles are registered. It is a very important part of land law, and reforms to this area of land law could and would have an adverse effect if not handled sensitively. The issue that I see in the current state of the land registration act 2002, is that there is a registration gap when a transferrer and a transferee completed a disposition and registered the disposition to the land registry. Because of section 27(1) of the land registration act 2002, the disposition will only take an effect in equity and not in law during a period of waiting for registration. As stated in section 27(1), the disposition of a registered state or a registered charge is required to be completed by registration. It does not operate at law until the relevant registration requirements are met. Despite this, owner’s powers can enable any person that is entitled to be registered, to enter into valid transference of the land during this registration gap. The gap can be long, and it is said by multiple stakeholders that the gap is getting longer, rather than shortening, even with the advancement of technology and the ability of electoral payment of stamp duty land tax and electronic lodgment of land registry being a possibility.

Hello, the meaning of this presentation is to outline different reforms to be made - to a certain area of land law. I will choose the land registration act 2002 as the area of land law I will propose reform for. I will identify the issues and problems with the current law in place. I will critique and analyze why it is in need of reform and propose reforms myself. I will then look at the strengths and or weaknesses of the proposed reform. The land registration act is a very relevant subject to look at, as it defines what rights, and / or interests a purchaser may or may not have, when buying registered or unregistered land. It also contains legislation that defines what interest are protected when titles are registered. It is a very important part of land law, and reforms to this area of land law could and would have an adverse effect if not handled sensitively. The issue that I see in the current state of the land registration act 2002, is that there is a registration gap when a transferrer and a transferee completed a disposition and registered the disposition to the land registry. Because of section 27(1) of the land registration act 2002, the disposition will only take an effect in equity and not in law during a period of waiting for registration. As stated in section 27(1), the disposition of a registered state or a registered charge is required to be completed by registration. It does not operate at law until the relevant registration requirements are met. Despite this, owner’s powers can enable any person that is entitled to be registered, to enter into valid transference of the land during this registration gap. The gap can be long, and it is said by multiple stakeholders that the gap is getting longer, rather than shortening, even with the advancement of technology and the ability of electoral payment of stamp duty land tax and electronic lodgment of land registry being a possibility. 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓

Hello, the meaning of this presentation is to outline different reforms to be made - to a certain area of land law. I will choose the land registration act 2002 as the area of land law I will propose reform for. I will identify the issues and problems with the current law in place. I will critique and analyze why it is in need of reform and propose reforms myself. I will then look at the strengths and or weaknesses of the proposed reform. The land registration act is a very relevant subject to look at, as it defines what rights, and / or interests a purchaser may or may not have, when buying registered or unregistered land. It also contains legislation that defines what interest are protected when titles are registered. It is a very important part of land law, and reforms to this area of land law could and would have an adverse effect if not handled sensitively. The issue that I see in the current state of the land registration act 2002, is that there is a registration gap when a transferrer and a transferee completed a disposition and registered the disposition to the land registry. Because of section 27(1) of the land registration act 2002, the disposition will only take an effect in equity and not in law during a period of waiting for registration. As stated in section 27(1), the disposition of a registered state or a registered charge is required to be completed by registration. It does not operate at law until the relevant registration requirements are met. Despite this, owner’s powers can enable any person that is entitled to be registered, to enter into valid transference of the land during this registration gap. The gap can be long, and it is said by multiple stakeholders that the gap is getting longer, rather than shortening, even with the advancement of technology and the ability of electoral payment of stamp duty land tax and electronic lodgment of land registry being a possibility.

Hello, the meaning of this presentation is to outline different reforms to be made - to a certain area of land law. I will choose the land registration act 2002 as the area of land law I will propose reform for. I will identify the issues and problems with the current law in place. I will critique and analyze why it is in need of reform and propose reforms myself. I will then look at the strengths and or weaknesses of the proposed reform. The land registration act is a very relevant subject to look at, as it defines what rights, and / or interests a purchaser may or may not have, when buying registered or unregistered land. It also contains legislation that defines what interest are protected when titles are registered. It is a very important part of land law, and reforms to this area of land law could and would have an adverse effect if not handled sensitively. The issue that I see in the current state of the land registration act 2002, is that there is a registration gap when a transferrer and a transferee completed a disposition and registered the disposition to the land registry. Because of section 27(1) of the land registration act 2002, the disposition will only take an effect in equity and not in law during a period of waiting for registration. As stated in section 27(1), the disposition of a registered state or a registered charge is required to be completed by registration. It does not operate at law until the relevant registration requirements are met. Despite this, owner’s powers can enable any person that is entitled to be registered, to enter into valid transference of the land during this registration gap. The gap can be long, and it is said by multiple stakeholders that the gap is getting longer, rather than shortening, even with the advancement of technology and the ability of electoral payment of stamp duty land tax and electronic lodgment of land registry being a possibility. Registration can take up to six months and an owner may try to enforce a positive covenant in this time period. The reason for a possibility of a six-month period, is that the land registry has to deal with multiple regulations and there are two waiting registrations, and that there are two waiting points in the registration gap: The gap between the completion of the disposition and applying to land registration. The second wait is the period of time of the application being submitted by the land registry and it being completed and then backdated. Further issues are found in the case of Brown and Root Technology Ltd versus Sun Alliance and London Assurance Co Ltd in 1996. In this case, the tenant and the registered proprietor of a standing 25-year lease was then transferred to a new tenant. The tenant that was leaving, exercised his right to terminate the lease. The court of appeal held that the lease had not been registered by the time of passing to the other tenant. The landlord and tenants act 1995 may have fixed these issues, but it has not been tested yet if registered proprietors can serve a valid break notice and if the new law covers break clauses. In light of these issues, I have identified the land registration act 2002. The reform I propose is to change when legal title passes from the transferer to the transferee to the date of the transfer from the date that it gets registered. I believe this would avoid for the need of a trust to be created between the transferer and the transferee and would avoid further avoid legal problems that arises when that trust is broken. There would be no waiting period for the transferer after the transposition disposition has been completed and his owner’s rights would be available to him after the transfer rather than after the registration has processed the application. The reform would also allow for the land registry to focus on the development of an online process, that could shorten the overall process of receiving applications rather than relying on deeds and contracts to be sent to them physically. There are also obvious weaknesses to this proposal reform; one being that it will not solve a significant part of the problems: the problems of registration taking a long time for complicated issues to be registered. The reform would also undermine the current registry policy, and could offer the possibility of owners choosing not to register as they would not be in a rush to become the owner by application. Owners would also find it hard to win for certain rights if their name is not on the registry. It would cause further confusion in the legal process. Multiple sections of the statue would also have to be amended, because of the proposed reform, such as section 24 of the land registration act 2002, which states that a person is entitled to exercise owner’s rights in relation to a registered estate or charge if he is a registered proprietor or entitled to be registered as the proprietor. Sections like this would be amended throughout because of this reform. In conclusion of this, I believe that this reform would offer clarity for owners and stakeholders and when they are entitled to their owner’s rights exclusively, rather than jointly with the previous owner. The registration gap would also be non-existent, allowing no confusion of legal rights. Despite this, I think the weaknesses mentioned above are overbearing and a reform would cause more problems than it solves. The next step of a better solution in this area, I believe cannot be found in legal reform. In technological investment and improvement towards the land registry which would offer the ability to have a complete online conveyance. This, I believe, is the next step in this area of the land registration act 2002. If the proposed reform did not provide a solution to the current issues, another small but important issue that I’ve identified in the land registration act 2002, is that compulsory registration is triggered by certain effects, such as transferring the property, or forcing it to be registered to the land registry. I believe that this causes inconsistency in the importance of registering a property in the UK. The majority of land in England and Wales is now registered, however a hundred percent has not yet been registered as millions of properties had to be registered. The registering of these properties had to be phased in by the land registration act 1925 and 2002. The fact that not every property is registered there, has to be legislation to cover the rights and interests of those unregistered properties. Important cases like Midland Bank Trust Ltd versus Green, and Kingsworth Finance Ltd versus Tizard 1986 have been formed due to unregistered land. In Midland Bank Trust versus Green 1981 a farmer granted an option to his son to purchase his farm. The family had a disagreement and the husband sold the farm, which he said was worth 40000 pounds to his wife, for five hundred pounds. This overrides the option, as it was not registered, as it should have been, under the land charges act 1972. This case shows how things can happen in bad faith due to unregistered land. In Kingsworth Finance Limited vs Tizard 1986, Mr. Tizard was the sole registered proprietor of some land, upon which he lived with his wife. They fell out (like Nemz and Kastaclysm) and mortgaged the house and then defaulted. Miss Tizard had contributed to the purchase price of the property. The bank could not obtain possession of the house, due to an equitable interest in the house, overridden by her actual occupation. These two cases are very important on unregistered land. The issue of overreaching would also have less cases to deal with, as it would only apply to registered land rather than registered and unregistered. My proposed reform for these issues, would be to amend the land registration act 2002, default registry of all property in the UK by 2020 or receive a fine when forced to registered after a triggered event. This proposed reform would help alleviate the cases that are complicated when dealing with unregistered land, and to help stop injustice by bad faith as shown in a leading case in that area. The reform would help to solidify the importance of registering a property in the UK, and would allow the land registry to have access to every property in the UK. The statute land charges act 1972 would also be able to become shorter and more precise, and the law found in that statute the protect unregistered owners and equitable interests and provide clarity that is lacking at times. The negatives of this reform, is that it may be overreaching on the possibility to register every property in the UK. It may even be impossible to know if every property is registered after 2020. The fine proposed, may provide an incentive to register a property, however it may stop owners from registering after 2020 to avoid the fine. In conclusion of this proposal, I believe this is a needed reform to solidify the importance of registering land in the UK. It would also allow the land registry to have a full database of land in the UK, so there is no confusion in ownership of property. The weaknesses may make this reform unreasonable and / or unrealistic to be used in the UK legislation, however I believe the proposed reform should and could have a positive change to the land registration act 2002. In reflection in of both my proposals, I believe both have a place in the UK legislation. If the appropriate changes needed come to fruition, and the expected weaknesses can be dealt with, with the support of professional consultants’ revision. Thank you.