When you are that advanced I’m sure you know it’s inevitable

They weren’t.

😢😢😢😢😢😢

The bomb really isn’t that impressive. You just surround a normal bomb in enriched uranium. This is the basic concept of a dirty bomb, and it’s only something you would do if you don’t have the technology to make an actual nuclear weapon.

it would never hitler didn't want nukes look into it

@@warelite5368 A bomb that rains radioactive snow isn't equivalent to a traditional nuclear weapon. I am also aware of the Thousand Year Reich concept and the massive infrastructure intended to be produced

@@warelite5368 yh cos there was never evidence. If it was proven by werner heisenburg he would have definitely gone ahead with it

Moderly the first stage, could be a flat RC *wide load* giant EV car. Catapult it up, during wing/fin pull up + static fire sync. It also had what I'd always recommend to aeronautical space & military designers. *Periscopes* for natural eye vision. This could be done in wide goggles peaking end, perfect for all Super Sonic+/landing/fire hazard vision. The other lacking. *Turbine micro air intakes* as adjacent wing+bodly transferred to nose tip. Lathers as 🚿 atmospheric entering🔰&🔥. Also pilots+passeger ejection stage vessel.

I've read it. Very interesting.

Thanks 🙂 I'll check that out 🙂

You kind of make it sound like this crazy rush to build the plane in a couple of hours once they learn the bomber is on the way.

I just discovered it! It's now one of my favorite books!

@@74KU Maybe not in a couple of hours, but -- spoiler! -- it's all done in such a rush that FDR actually seems to have cancelled the Manhattan Project in favor of the Silverbird killer!

The skip glide concept keeps coming up. It’s extremely efficient.

Even Gemini was originally designed to glide to a runway. Look up "Rogallo wing".

Big difference is that DynaSoar was intended to be an orbital spacecraft (Dream Chaser is essentially a follow-on combining the DynaSoar concept with lifting body research done by NASA after DynaSoar's cancellation). Still, pretty out there for the time no matter how you slice it.

@@svenmorgenstern9506 I've always thought that this project was named by someone with a tin ear and no sense of humor whatsoever. "Dyna-Soar? DINOSAUR?! You want us to build a FLYING DINOSAUR?!?"

@@seanbigay1042 Who knows, maybe someone was a fan of Dinah Shore?

Sounds a little hideous 😂 I mean the denial

Germans were tight on budget and resources. If these proposals would have been put forward when Germany was winning then they may have been more development

Fascism is very picky. Too big tanks and jets, out the window.

@@adlfilefold1744 Thats why they built not one but 3 freaking Maus tanks, well one complete, 2 hulls and a turret, then even partially built E-100 super heavy tank....

@@SMGJohn one completely? Wasn't it they build 2 hulls, a turret, and one e 100 hull and the soviets then lifted the turret at the hull?

I want a scale model of that

@@DamplyDoo I actually have a model. I brought it 20 years ago and never assembled.

Looking at it now this os very similar project dyna-soar

It’s not a vehicle…it’s a drawing.

Photos of a wind tunnel model of this aircraft exist. The first plan called for it to be placed on a monorail track just above the ground. The track was 1.4 kilometers long and gently sloped upwards at 5 degrees. The takeoff weight of this bomber was 100 tons, of which 90% was fuel. Behind it were two V-2 rocket engines in pods which would provide the initial boost, one after the other. The bomber would then ignite its own engine and reach a speed of about Mach 19. By skipping across the top of the atmosphere, it could extend its range. The pilot would drop a single atomic bomb at a point designed to hit New York City. The blast radius was 4 kilometers across. This information comes from a published captured German document. The bomber would continue on to complete one orbit of the earth, landing somewhere in Germany as an unpowered glider.@@annoyingbstard9407

The attacks on the mobile V1 sites (Operation Cross Bow) cost the allies so many lost aircraft and lost pilots it is generally regarded as a significant material victory for the Germans. The need for long sealed runways (almost as long as modern commercial jumbo jet runways) certainly did trouble the Luftwaffe's "Amerika Bomber" Plans as they feared bombing. A 1943 Me 264 powered by Jumo 211J/P engines of around 1500hp would need RATO rockets to get of the ground in a reasonably sized runway for such a long range mission. By 1944/45 the DB603H (DB603L) with high octane C3 fuel with 2400hp could do the job without RATO but it was too late. One reason the Junker Ju 390 remained a strong contender for the Amerika program was that its low wing loading gave it a very short STOL like takeoff roll that was important to the Luftwaffe in 1944.

@@williamzk9083 I didn't know the details abougt the Peenemunde bombing raid, only that it happened. Thank you for enlightening me.

This book is a must read if you are into ww2 history.

@@zh84 Crossbow was the raid on V1 launching ramps. The RAF raid on Penemunde was a success in delaying the programs mainly by killing some of the engineers.

Went from horses to the moon in less than 50 years. How did this happen? Spent hundreds of thousands of years on horses... then boom.. walking on the moon. What was the catalyst? Did humans receive help? What breakthrough happened that allowed more technical achievement in 20-30 years then the previous 200,000? I dont understand it.

Newton

he already did a vid on the YF23

I saw it in the Museum of Pennemünde, really interesting.

@@MangoMarc96 Yes, it is, and for its time was highly advanced. There are some videos on You Tube abouts its design, production and operation. It was a very neat thing to learn about.

Two German Physicists Herbert Mataré & Heinrich Welker invented the transistor in the same month as Bardeen did in US

They never credit nazis, hence you haven't heard of them

@@williamzk9083 They only built the first transistor, Austro-Hungarian and British researchers wrote early papers on these transistors but apparently never built anything but prototypes which at the time were of no interest to the industries. Same with MOSFET was a concept from Austrian researchers but never saw mass production until the 60s

@@SMGJohn Herbert Mataré & Heinrich Welker worked on German WW2 radar. Matare recalled seeing what he retrospectively realized was amplification on the duo diodes they were working on. Interesting to think what might have happened had he perused what he saw and invented the transistor in say 1942/43. Herbert Mataré & Heinrich Welker actually had their transistor in production years before anyone in the US did. They were tungsten point contact transistors.

@@williamzk9083 Yes, history is always full of people who invent and even build it, but never get anywhere for not themselves understanding the importance of it, and its hard to argue against it, I mean had Herbert and Heinrich actually done the transistor in 1942, the Germans could potentially have won the war because they would have obtained proximity fuse, the challenge with shooting down the bombers was accuracy, but proximity fuse was a long dream of all sides and its hard to argue against the proximity shell winning the air war in Pacific, God be helping if the Germans had it by 1943, it would been impossible to bomb the mainland, the allies were at least 5~ years away from rockets capable of striking Germany with precision.

@@stevencramsie9172 that's what I meant.

_Thanks! Never heard of that plane _*_. . ._*

Wasn't a turbojets, he used a piston engine to compress air before injecting into a combustion chamber and ejected the burned gasses through a nozzle, the correct name for this type of engines is motorjet. But actually Coandă make a prototype and accidentally destroyed it in a test that should be limited to ground, but because of lack of experience ended in a accidental liftoff.

@Imperator Caesar Traianus Hadrianus Augustus Coandă was Romanian but that plane was built in France, and eventually he remains in that county and end his life as a french, somehow like South Africa born Elon Musk is American now.

@@theOrionsarms wasnt that confirmed to just be him lying?

@@therealtony2009 was accused to be a liers, by the people who use to say that a airplanes cannot fly without a propeller, that makes it a person with reputation tarnished at least for the next 35 years, but eventually he was recognized as a respectable scientist and engineer, even if only for discovery of Coandă effect, how many of his detractors have a physical process named after them?

People seem to forget that atmospheric heating is a thing no matter what direction you are going.

Yeah I think someone did the math and basically the entire project was a massive waste of time because it was absolutely infeasible. Basically it sucked money away from the Germans when it could have been spent on something like the v2

@@lilhombrae3532 For all of its evilness, the "third reich" was very much like a DLC in a video game in regard to all the scientific goodies the Allies found after the war was over. All of these things, including space craft, *would* eventually be turned into real products, but it would take decades (multiple decades in some cases) for them to come to fruition.

Feasible. Moderly the first stage, could be a flat RC *wide load* giant EV car. Catapult it up, during wing/fin pull up + static fire sync. It also had what I'd always recommend to aeronautical space & military designers. *Periscopes* for natural eye vision. This could be done in wide goggles peaking end, perfect for all Super Sonic+/landing/fire hazard vision. The other lacking. *Turbine micro air intakes* as adjacent wing+bodly transferred to nose tip. Lathers as 🚿 atmospheric entering🔰&🔥. Also pilots+passeger ejection stage vessel.

@@rolflandale2565 homie what

The rocket equation is pseudoscience.

-Werner von Braun Chose alcohol as the fuel for the A4 (V2) because it wouldn't gum up or clag the regeneratively cooled combustion chambers, injectors etc. However Saenger after experiments settled on LOX/Kerosene as the fuel and I believe got to in excess of 2800 m/sec exhaust velocity (maybe 3000 m/sec) which was about 1000m/sec greater than the V2. I believe he used a pressurized water cooled jacket as an interposing loop to ensure the hydrocarbon didn't break down. I suspect they would have simply approached I.G.Farben and used a synthetic non gumming hydrocarbon coming out of the Fischer Tropsch Plants. -Encyclopedia Astranautix refers to Mach 13 as the peak speed (that's about 3900 m/sec). That implies a mass fraction of just over 4:1 which is achievable (V2 was about 4.5:1). The sled was to release the vehicle to 250 m/sec (about Mach 0.83). The Hypersonic Glide ratio was to be about 5:1 and the subsonic glide ratio about 7.5:1. The ability to climb through winged flight is worth a fair amount in delta v. -The aircraft seems very testable to me. You would simply accelerate a glider version down the sled/track and check forces such as lift, drag, moment on the vehicle. Then one would progress to a release and glide to a landing at a runway down range of the track. Gradually propulsion would be added and the flight envelop extended. -The airfoil was rhombic double wedge. There were plenty of suitable and affordable metals to use such as the cromadur and tinidur used on the Jumo 004 jet engine or the sicromal used on the BMW 003 all capable of considerable strength to nearly 1000 degrees C. I do think they would need refractory ceramics on the leading edges and nose. Either a graphite based material as used on the V2 or a ceramic. The MAN company had built ceramic turbine blades to try to replace the use of metals.

@@williamzk9083 so you think a rocket can exceed the velocity of its exhaust? Lol no, Newton is very clear it cannot.

​@@papalegba6796Why couldn't it?

@@j_a_aIf you don’t understand, then I am sorry for you. Ever heard of the phrase, “Every reaction has an opposite and equal reaction”?

Well, it wouldn’t work. They massively underestimated the effects of atmospheric heating, so it would do a Colombia disaster the instant it touched the atmosphere.

Considering this 'thing' was never produced or tested, it could have been anything on paper, what counts it what happens when built and tested..

Sounds very similar to the Redstone rocket.

Probably the later.

it was built and still stands in its silo in Ohrdruf 40 meters underground! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/np9xgLCHyMjVcac.html

Considering the accuracy problems that the V2 had attacking London, that thing would have probably missed the _state_ it was aimed at more often than it hit.

@@Shaun_Jones you are not well informed, Germany had radio guided missile routing systems. Very exact! They could reach any surface target within less than 7 Meters radius! Siemens build these analogue computer controlled systems!

@@ttnuhbhyh8013**Ahem** Goddard’s Rocket. Flew almost two decades before the V2 launched. Can’t forget about Tiny Tims and HVARs as well.

​​@@robertoroberto9798I think he meant liquid fuel ballistic missile like the v-2

Its another think to draw or make a scale model than making it work

the Nazis were the masters of making crazy stuff yet not having the will or manpower to build it

@@kulmabricks They built and tested the LOX Kerosene rocket engines, they worked and out performed anything for the next 10 years. They tested the shapes in Mach 5.5 Wind tunnels at Volkenrod. They had the alloys (cromadur, sicromal and tinidur all used also in gas turbines).

it never was: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hNSilNiJx6mbqYE.html

Having ideas doesn't make one advanced. Truly advanced societies are the ones that can sustain complex organizations together to realize the crazy ideas into real products.

If the Germans would have first got all the technology and then started the war in 1945, the world today would be different... Or if they would, ve won the war.. What nearly happened, but Hitler just Has interfered too many times, he wasn't good at war stuff, his generals were, but he not

And without Japan as ally

Germany didn't have the same access to enriched uranium that the USA, and that at this point in time the Eastern front with Russia was beginning to crumble. We like to paint Germany as some kind of mythic "What if" monster, but in reality, they didn't have the economy to compete with 3 Super powers.

Manfred Griehl in "Luftwaffe Over Amerika" writes of German in Flight refueling tests in 1943 between a Ju 252 and a Ju 290 using a hose and drogue technique over what is now Czechoslovkia but was then part of the Reich/Germany. The tests were very successful according to the minutes of meeting Griehl published in the book detailing the conversation between Erhard Milch (Head of Luftwaffe procurement) and the Luftwaffe engineers responsible for the Ju 290 program. Tests and experiments had been going on with smaller aircraft since 1940. There are no photos of the 1943 but there are of the 1940 ones and there are diagrams of the era. Basically a hose with drogue was trailed by the receiving aircraft. The tanker flew below and behind and snagged the drogue with a spring loaded Y shaped fork about 2m behind above the cockpit that drew the hose into the tanker and it connected to the quick release/connect system. Fuel was then pumped up. -I must say in these minutes Erhardt Milch left a bad impression with endless sarcasm about the impractical egg heads designing such systems and comments about how things would go wrong in "pea soup" bad weather. The Luftwaffe actually had marker homing beacons buoys called "Schwann See" that they dropped ahead of convoys so that u-boats and later patrol aircraft could find the convoy that could be used to ensure rendezvous in bad weather. These were also used by German Ju 88S1 pathfinders to to mark pathways between British radar coverage for German bombers and to create a beacon for He 111 bombers releasing V1 Buzz bombs. They certainly could have been used to ensure rendezvous with the tanker in bad weather should the tanker and receiver aircraft become separated. There were also "Schwann Luft" radio becons that descended by parachute and "Schwann Land" that radiated from the ground. --Milch seems to have been sincere and wanted the best but it was better for the Luftwaffe when he was replaced by Siegfried Kneymeyer after Milch argued with Hitler over the Me 262. -Tanker equipment had actually been designed for the He 177A0 and was supposed to extend patrol range to 9000 miles but we all know what happened to this aircraft program.

its more like a cruise missile

It flew into space in then returned to the atmosphere and used the lift to skip backing into space. This skipping process was very efficient, more efficient than ballistic flight or hypersonic flight and allowed great range as well as manouvetabillity. It could turn and return.

In a way. It would go ballistic after each bounce, so...

Based on how many ads I got from them, I'd say they are both on blitzkrieg, the latter making great headway against my subscription feed. Why must every video come plastered in ads inside and out, really derails the video for +30 seconds every time.

No, it probably doesn't go fast enough to actually get something into a stable orbit.

New York wiped off the map would've been FAR from a bad thing .....

@@benoitguillou3146 what does that have to do with the plane?

@@northprime_unlimited i think the plane , done right would have spared the world a LOT of Murican wars , fuckery , blown pipelines and backstabbing

@@benoitguillou3146 you in the wrong section bro we’re talking about planes not politics. Keep it moving

@@northprime_unlimited wrong section ? Why ? Cuz you dictated so ? I don tgive a crap

Prob a glitch that was over looked

So you can Seymour, Shirley

20-30g. That is not suitable for a human body. Don't you understand? It was all a mith.

@@MrPennywise1540 just because it wasn't built, doesn't make it mith. I think I found an English translation one of those long papers mentioned in the video somewhere on the internet. It gives the figure in there. 20+g has been proved to be survivable, so long as it is going front to back through the body, not top to bottom like fast jet pilots face.

@@petersullivan5240 The bouncing concepts and the accelerations, beside the lack of proper materials and power made the idea impossible.

The claims of 20-30G aren't correct and I think a mistake that's spread The "Found and explained" video talks of a 1900km/h launch and a 3km track. That's 500 m/sec. If you accelerate at 10G (100m/s/s) you'll get to 500m/s in 5 secs and use up only 1250m of track. That leaves 500m for separation and another 1250m for an abort or to slow down the sled. -The highly reputable Encyclopedia Astranautix gives the separation speed as 900km is about 250m/sec. That's only Mach 0.7 at seal level. A 3G acceleration (30m/s/s) will get you to 250m/sec in 1000m of track leaving maybe 1km for rotation and separation and 1km for a 3G abort.