The New Air Force One: What We Know So Far

  Рет қаралды 1,550,706

Simple Flying

Simple Flying

3 жыл бұрын

Air Force One is probably the most recognizable plane in the world. While the VC25Bs, which will be designated Air Force One when the president is onboard, won’t be delivered until 2024, some details about the upgrade are already in the public domain. Here’s what we know about the replacement Air Force One so far.
Here’s what we know about the replacement Air Force One so far.
Video source links:
Air Force One (VC-25A) Footage: • Video
• President Obama Deplan...
• Video
• Air Force One and SAM4...
• AIR FORCE ONE - US Air...
747-412 Transaero • Transaero 747-412 EI-X...
747 Transaero • Landing EI-XLN Transae...
Photo sources:
- Donald Trump - WhiteHouse.gov
- Boeing
- freesvg.org/747-air-force-one
Simple Flying:
Visit our website where we publish 150-200 news stories per week: simpleflying.com/
Listen to our weekly podcast: simpleflying.com/podcast/
Download our iOS & Android app: simpleflying.com/simple-flyin...
Daily email digest sign up: simpleflying.com/daily-digest/
Check out our second KZfaq channel: / @longhaulbysimpleflying
Follow us on social media:
Instagram: / simpleflyingnews
Twitter: / simple_flying
Facebook: / simpleflyingnews
Linkedin: / 33222643
#aviation #flight #avgeek #airlines #flying

Пікірлер: 3 000
@salvaahthesageofficial2457
@salvaahthesageofficial2457 3 жыл бұрын
I'm glad that the Queen of the Skies will still be airborne for many many years to come!
@rc666
@rc666 3 жыл бұрын
Really?
@ssj5balc
@ssj5balc 3 жыл бұрын
@Chris Kibb paint job isn’t official yet
@drivenbyrage5710
@drivenbyrage5710 3 жыл бұрын
I can think of a dozen things America needs more than this plane. Btw, the United States military exists by and for one reason. To protect the dollar. No weapon in thier arsenal is more powerful. Take care.
@Think_Inc
@Think_Inc 3 жыл бұрын
Sadly, the King if the skies won't.
@kylecampbell1444
@kylecampbell1444 3 жыл бұрын
@@drivenbyrage5710 The president is going to need a plane. And if you look at the cost of keeping the current ones flying you can buy new planes pretty easy. The US air force is about the only people still flying the-200 series. I just looked not one 200 is flying right now. Even cargo companies are getting rude of them. The new parts inventory is gone and they have to resource or make new parts. Even the doomsday planes may not make it much longer. This is not a B52 that sits on a flight line 90% of the time.
@jeremydee5424
@jeremydee5424 3 жыл бұрын
Surprised that it won’t have the mid air refuel capability.
@Inboundbogie
@Inboundbogie 3 жыл бұрын
I'm also shocked. This should definitely be a "no questions asked" feature. Dam.
@81Alfetta
@81Alfetta 3 жыл бұрын
It does seem like an odd omission. Part of me can /sort/ of understand the reasoning (note "understand" does not equal "agree with"): the current aircraft were spec'd toward the end of the Cold War, so being able to stay airborne indefinitely in the event/threat of a nuclear exchange or some other global catastrophe would have been important. When the specification for these aircraft was being put together, that kind of exchange was considered a more remote possibility, the west having spent the last two decades in asymmetric conflicts. I could see someone deciding the aircraft was less of a contingency plan and more just a VIP transport... and the 8 has plenty of range to deal with that. Of course, since then everyone has been swinging back toward gearing up for a peer-state conflict again, so that sort of thinking is suddenly looking out of date itself. I wonder how much money that omission actually saved.
@meauxjeaux431
@meauxjeaux431 3 жыл бұрын
Doesn't make sense does it ?
@Bill_N_ATX
@Bill_N_ATX 3 жыл бұрын
In the years that the current planes have been flown, at no time has the aerial refueling ever been used while a passenger was on the aircraft. It’s simply thought to be too dangerous a task to be used with the President aboard unless no other option is available. In the mean time, it means that the maneuver must be practiced by the pilots over and over again on a regular basis since it is a skill that requires very regular practice to remain proficient. Finally, this bird will have huge range with hours of loitering time as built since it will come with enlarged fuel tanks etc. That is if they don’t want to fly it fast since it will be one of the fastest airliners remaining in the skies. But that’s a different discussion. So it’s probably a reasonable thing to leave off the aircraft.
@mcearl8073
@mcearl8073 3 жыл бұрын
@@Bill_N_ATX That’s a fair point. Isn’t it safe to say however that AF1 has a lot of other features that never get used as well? Same with the Beast, it never had to drive on just the wheel with no tire, but it can if needed to keep the president safe.
@juancarlosnunezf96
@juancarlosnunezf96 3 жыл бұрын
Taking away the on air refuel capability is a big mistake.
@lamontjohnson5810
@lamontjohnson5810 3 жыл бұрын
No it isn't.
@ce1834
@ce1834 3 жыл бұрын
Dont they still have the Doomsday plane so its all good if they need a mobile war room
@RobbieIsbell
@RobbieIsbell 3 жыл бұрын
It'll be nuclear powered. 😁
@paulgrimmond6296
@paulgrimmond6296 3 жыл бұрын
@@ce1834 you mean the E4-B? It's older than the air force one to be replaced
@Likeusb1
@Likeusb1 3 жыл бұрын
@@RobbieIsbell A nuclear powered 747? What? Since when?
@ChoySekMunSimon
@ChoySekMunSimon 3 жыл бұрын
They should retain the classic livery originally designed Raymond Loewry. The new proposed livery makes it look like some flying casino.
@dereklwashington1132
@dereklwashington1132 3 жыл бұрын
a bankrupt flying casino
@ChoySekMunSimon
@ChoySekMunSimon 3 жыл бұрын
@@dereklwashington1132 exactly!
@wolfganglauda5630
@wolfganglauda5630 3 жыл бұрын
@@dereklwashington1132 I've only been in one trump building, Trump Plaza. I was so happy to see it imploded.
@VaporheadATC
@VaporheadATC 2 жыл бұрын
The "classic" look is ugly as hell.
@scarecrow108productions7
@scarecrow108productions7 2 жыл бұрын
@@dereklwashington1132 beat me to it!
@markpotvin7119
@markpotvin7119 3 жыл бұрын
I like the "Jackie Kennedy" color scheme.
@JesseWright68
@JesseWright68 3 жыл бұрын
I do as well. Only a putz like Trump would say something like he did.
@brainstuff555
@brainstuff555 3 жыл бұрын
Outdated though. It looks very art deco.
@scottyee707
@scottyee707 3 жыл бұрын
the baby blue looks geahhh, doest look American at all
@wattson451
@wattson451 3 жыл бұрын
@@scottyee707 but it looks very Air Force One-ish
@heartbreak25
@heartbreak25 3 жыл бұрын
And because Trump lost it's staying.
@FutureSystem738
@FutureSystem738 3 жыл бұрын
The 747-8 is a fabulous machine, so glad they’ll be flying for decades to come.
@amjadhamraoui7061
@amjadhamraoui7061 Жыл бұрын
I agree with you. For me, the 747-8 is one of the best aircraft in the world
@Jason-jb6jm
@Jason-jb6jm 3 жыл бұрын
Definitely the Jackie look is more classy. By the comments here im one of many who wish to see the legacy continue
@rockn997
@rockn997 3 жыл бұрын
Af1 will be done just in time for our real President to come back.
@VaporheadATC
@VaporheadATC 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, it's an outdated 1960's look.
@Tee_Davis
@Tee_Davis 2 жыл бұрын
No
@hypnodic01
@hypnodic01 3 жыл бұрын
Livery is not only generic and classless...it removes the intent of the original design that the specific blue blends with the sky
@theskyline1425
@theskyline1425 3 жыл бұрын
One of the most and heavily modified expensive planes in the world. Can't wait to see the new birds
@itstomatogear6806
@itstomatogear6806 3 жыл бұрын
Congratulations 🎉👏 of being the top comment 👍😁 (as of now 😈)
@theskyline1425
@theskyline1425 3 жыл бұрын
@@itstomatogear6806 thanks😊😊
@annndukumutua833
@annndukumutua833 3 жыл бұрын
Hi
@theskyline1425
@theskyline1425 3 жыл бұрын
@@annndukumutua833 hey Ann
@lovedfriend2020
@lovedfriend2020 3 жыл бұрын
Yep and Trump wont F it up
@godchagk89
@godchagk89 3 жыл бұрын
I really hope the livery doesn't change. Rejecting dark colors was done specifically because Kennedy thought it was too regal, too monarch-ish. George Washington originally wore a baby blue ribbon across his chest to distinguish his rank as commander in chief, so I think it has a cool precedent. The well placed swoops give the plane an eliminate of moving forward, echoing the American spirit of progress, where the new scheme is very static. Plus, the polished aluminum accent is so unique. I have a hard time believing anyone could look at the new scheme and say its more interesting and dynamic than the current one that has remained iconic for half a century. Air Force One has been painted as such for more than half a century. It and photographs of it are synonymous with America, it has been there for every major foreign, and many domestic historic events. It is a part of our culture now. Personally I think it projects a level of self confidence that strong colors which scream, "look at me, fear me," cannot. It is a tradition ten presidents have honored, I cannot think of any good reason it is not good enough for the 11th. That said, I'm glad it does not have black or gold in it, and at least the dark blue and red has a traditional nautical feel to it (and of course American). If I was lucky enough to own a yacht it'd have a dark blue hull. But it feels super basic and boring, like it is trying too hard to be strong. Or if you told a 10th grader to come up with a color scheme this would be it. And again, the static feeling of the straight lines doesn't compare to the swoops that invoke forward movement and progress that our country traditionally has valued. Maybe if they could lighten the blue a bit more?
@sgthree
@sgthree 3 жыл бұрын
your comment that the dark colours looking 'monarch-ish' is appropriate because Chump is trying to create a monarchy for the USA. He hates democracy, and doesn't believe in it. I doubt, however, if he got his way, the monarchy would be passive, such as that in the UK, but more like a dictatorship (North Korean style).
@Think_Inc
@Think_Inc 3 жыл бұрын
@@sgthree Haha. Trump will indeed do that!😂
@meauxjeaux431
@meauxjeaux431 3 жыл бұрын
Should paint that sumbitch solid black ! I would also put the grim reaper on the tail. I mean if you're going to make a statement....MAKE IT COUNT !
@Greatdome99
@Greatdome99 3 жыл бұрын
AF1's beautiful color scheme was designed by industrial designer Raymond Loewy, who designed a number of American icons, include the Coca Cola bottle, GM's Scenicruiser bus, various Studebakers, logos for TWA, Shell Oil, Exxon, USPS--the list goes on. That blue was picked by Jackie Kennedy, and should be retained in her memory. Donald Trump has no knowledge of this--or respect for history.
@mcearl8073
@mcearl8073 3 жыл бұрын
@@Greatdome99 It seems he does know that as he said it’s “too Jackie Kennedy”. I don’t have any issue with changing the livery. I’d want the new planes to look new. Even American icon brands change their logos and designs occasionally.
@ald8612
@ald8612 3 жыл бұрын
I am pleased and very proud they are using the Boeing 747-800! The 747 has always been the Queen of the Skies. Its beautiful, recognizable and majestic just like the American Eagle!
@DannyCaliBoy
@DannyCaliBoy 3 жыл бұрын
I loved the old color scheme but I also look forward to the new scheme. Looks great in my opinion.
@spongebubatz
@spongebubatz 3 жыл бұрын
The older, blue paint scheme will stay
@puirYorick
@puirYorick 3 ай бұрын
I can't recall the exact reasons but the very dark blue for the underside was going to cause (thermal?) difficulties along the fuselage I read somewhere. Anyway, I'm happy they reversed that choice back to the traditional scheme.
@nolanrussell518
@nolanrussell518 3 жыл бұрын
747-8 was absolutely the right choice. And I’m hoping that the publicity may give her one last hurrah
@gmitchellfamily
@gmitchellfamily 3 жыл бұрын
Trump in a nutshell.
@nabeelshariff6006
@nabeelshariff6006 3 жыл бұрын
U r an idiot
@JohnSmith-be5py
@JohnSmith-be5py 3 жыл бұрын
@@gmitchellfamily This project was started with the Obama administration and the plane won’t even been completed before Trump leaves office you fucking idiot.
@kylecampbell1444
@kylecampbell1444 3 жыл бұрын
@@gmitchellfamily Greg you are a nutshell.
@bugs9284
@bugs9284 3 жыл бұрын
She’ll get more than one hurrah
@noedog
@noedog 3 жыл бұрын
The new paint scheme looks like a postage stamp. The current livery is iconic, hope they keep it.
@garrisonbrumblay9137
@garrisonbrumblay9137 3 жыл бұрын
Lol, I also hope they keep the current livery
@DonChartier
@DonChartier 3 жыл бұрын
No way the Biden administration keeps the Trump livery. The Raymond Loewy design is iconic.
@ThorsHammer1
@ThorsHammer1 3 жыл бұрын
That paint scheme is just a flip of the paint job on Trump's corporate jet. A way for him to put his grimy fingerprints on another American icon after he gets thrown out of office. Hopefully President Biden will cancel that change on January 21, 2021.
@brians9436
@brians9436 3 жыл бұрын
@@DonChartier so AF1 looking like American is a bad thing??
@DonChartier
@DonChartier 3 жыл бұрын
@@brians9436 Where did I say that?
@ceddricc5909
@ceddricc5909 3 жыл бұрын
Nothing really screams "Air force 1" Without that iconic baby blue color
@SovsBorg
@SovsBorg 3 жыл бұрын
I want the same traditional paint job!!!!!
@macsdestroypcs
@macsdestroypcs 3 жыл бұрын
That new livery looks like a tube of Colgate toothpaste
@WillFastie
@WillFastie 3 жыл бұрын
Agreed. The Lowry design is timeless and, after so long, iconic.
@FuneralGraveMemorial
@FuneralGraveMemorial 3 жыл бұрын
Nikki Haley is going to be the first president to fly on that. Watch it happen.
@_baller
@_baller 3 жыл бұрын
That's primer you clown
@keco185
@keco185 3 жыл бұрын
I like my planes minty fresh and cavity free
@thehonestdoctor3590
@thehonestdoctor3590 3 жыл бұрын
@@FuneralGraveMemorial hopefully not! She's a warmongering NEOCON 👎
@rednightfire2655
@rednightfire2655 3 жыл бұрын
100k already?! Congrats! Let’s hope for more to come :D
@SimpleFlyingNews
@SimpleFlyingNews 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the support! - TB
@theskyline1425
@theskyline1425 3 жыл бұрын
Wow. This video is at 1M views already Congrats simple flying!
@DonChartier
@DonChartier 3 жыл бұрын
As of January 25, 2021, the paint hasn't even been ordered.
@RK18771
@RK18771 3 жыл бұрын
Too bad they are retiring the old livery. Looks really cool and is iconic.
@ant2312
@ant2312 3 жыл бұрын
no it doesnt
@RK18771
@RK18771 3 жыл бұрын
@@ant2312 You are in the minority my friend.
@suneagle123
@suneagle123 3 жыл бұрын
I’m am surprised that Trump did not make it look like his 757. I could give trump credit for the red white and blue but I kind of prefer the current livery.
@axl1632
@axl1632 3 жыл бұрын
I think i'm only one that seems an little reesemble of the last TWA's Globe ambassador livery (before to be takedown by AA) with these kind of colors combo?
@NoGoodHandlesComingToMind
@NoGoodHandlesComingToMind 3 жыл бұрын
I agree that it's iconic, but IMHO the chromed lower area was looking a bit dated.
@grantgeorgia7168
@grantgeorgia7168 3 жыл бұрын
The new paint scheme/livery looks remarkably similar to Trump's private 757 livery. That being said, I prefer the AF1 old livery. Maybe a slight refresh is needed, but not a complete redesign to a classic.
@meauxjeaux431
@meauxjeaux431 3 жыл бұрын
For the most part, the colors are just inverted, But Trump's plane looks a lot better.
@erik_griswold
@erik_griswold 3 жыл бұрын
It is the Trump Shuttle livery.
@user-de4cq6uk6l
@user-de4cq6uk6l 3 жыл бұрын
Yea it’s a bad livery
@Indpendent01
@Indpendent01 3 жыл бұрын
@calodo2002 Technically, Trump could lose this cycle and win the next, being the first to fly in it.
@tristanskipworth4377
@tristanskipworth4377 3 жыл бұрын
@calodo2002 he has done nothing illegal. Other people have done far worse and have not repercussions.
@ColonelPeppers
@ColonelPeppers 3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, that livery looks like something you would see on a toy plane.
@ThorsHammer1
@ThorsHammer1 3 жыл бұрын
That paint scheme is just a flip of the paint job on Trump's corporate jet. A way for him to put his grimy fingerprints on another American icon after he gets thrown out of office. Hopefully President Biden will cancel that change on January 21, 2021.
@codered5431
@codered5431 3 жыл бұрын
They will put it in now
@kennyhenry7432
@kennyhenry7432 3 жыл бұрын
Something from China!
@Love2Cruise
@Love2Cruise 3 жыл бұрын
@@kennyhenry7432 It reminds me of the old, Taiwan-based, China Airlines' livery.
@covfefe8971
@covfefe8971 3 жыл бұрын
Not surprizing since it came from a toy president. You knew someone would say it. :)
@Peezee420
@Peezee420 3 жыл бұрын
Glad it will have those new GE Gen 9X engines! That might be the reason they wouldn't need to refuel in the air. Each engine produces 134,000 pounds of thrust plus they are the most fuel efficient engines that can also run on biofuels. The 747=800s bubble on top is the length of a 737 oh those engines are the same size of the fuselage of the 737.
@On-Our-Radar-24News
@On-Our-Radar-24News 3 жыл бұрын
Yes, absolutely, the 747-800 is a excellent choice to continue the AF1 fleet. The "Queen" of the skies is one of the most reliable and safe airframes flying and with a 40 plus flying history, these will serve the U.S. for many decades. The 747 is an amazing airplane to fly and is very forgiving.
@GigachadetteSelene
@GigachadetteSelene 3 жыл бұрын
Congrats for 100K, SF! or the best channel for interesting aviation vids
@SimpleFlyingNews
@SimpleFlyingNews 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the support! - TB
@Chromegrillz
@Chromegrillz 3 жыл бұрын
I love the old baby blue.
@brainsmasher6617
@brainsmasher6617 3 жыл бұрын
Proud to say I worked on the VC-25.
@iamjames8200
@iamjames8200 3 жыл бұрын
Congrats on 100K! Didn’t seem too long ago when I was watching at 30K. Keep it up! Next stop, half a million!
@SimpleFlyingNews
@SimpleFlyingNews 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your support. - TB
@JT-sz7xc
@JT-sz7xc 3 жыл бұрын
Glad we will keep 747’s as Air Force One, however, I don’t believe in changing the paint scheme, the current paint scheme is iconic, everyone who sees it knows its USA, somethings shouldn’t change!
@deepalperera4592
@deepalperera4592 3 жыл бұрын
The new one looks ugly IMO
@gendaminoru3195
@gendaminoru3195 3 жыл бұрын
The new one looks gorgeous IMO
@classicgalactica5879
@classicgalactica5879 3 жыл бұрын
@@gendaminoru3195 Agreed. The old livery was okay, but to me the color combo just didn't look American enough.
@simonbone
@simonbone 3 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one who thinks the current livery, with its swoops and Caslon lettering, looks very dated?
@deepalperera4592
@deepalperera4592 3 жыл бұрын
@@simonbone no, I think so too
@charles1203
@charles1203 2 жыл бұрын
I like this, about time for an upgrade.
@ernestnora6188
@ernestnora6188 3 жыл бұрын
Let’s keep the original blue and white color scheme
@daradiant1
@daradiant1 3 жыл бұрын
Right, the soul purpose of those colors is to blend within the sky. That is why Mrs. Jackie chose the colors.
@waltjie
@waltjie 3 жыл бұрын
Congratulations on 100K!!!!
@SimpleFlyingNews
@SimpleFlyingNews 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your support. - TB
@82attilatoth
@82attilatoth 3 жыл бұрын
The new livery looks so old already. It looks like a retro livery from the '90s.
@SimonH72
@SimonH72 3 жыл бұрын
Too “Trump Airlines”?
@Ragingcap1212
@Ragingcap1212 3 жыл бұрын
Huh..you want Boeing to release a color update....?
@simonford7806
@simonford7806 3 жыл бұрын
looks like an old American Airlines livery
@vieuxbal1253
@vieuxbal1253 3 жыл бұрын
@@simonford7806 or United Airlines
@cmbsharks
@cmbsharks 3 жыл бұрын
Not a fan of the revised colors.
@tylerchambliss8379
@tylerchambliss8379 2 жыл бұрын
For all those asking why they got rid of in-air refueling, there are currently no cases of it actually being used in the entire time it's been made available, so they didn't add it to save some money, and to reduce weight.
@Rl082992
@Rl082992 3 жыл бұрын
Perfect choice for the next Air Force One.
@khioukhom419
@khioukhom419 3 жыл бұрын
I hope they change their mind on the livery to something more modern. It looks like an 90s simple design. Strangely, the Kennedy livery looks more modern.
@avaikyl1
@avaikyl1 3 жыл бұрын
The 747-8 is the perfect choice for replacing the current VC-25 Air Force One jets.
@whichkatami
@whichkatami 3 жыл бұрын
Rumor has it, Jack asked Jackie to approve final drawings of paint scheme and colors for AF-1. Camelot never existed, but they did, many in 2021 push back hard against any color or, design changes, as AF-1 is so recognizable and iconic, like both of its designers.
@vk4jrc
@vk4jrc 3 жыл бұрын
Best choice.....ultra reliable, structurally solid and have great handling characteristics.
@kovacsabelkristof3566
@kovacsabelkristof3566 3 жыл бұрын
Idk this new paint scheme looks like a Malaysian paint scheme. The old (and current) one is -in my opinion- better looking.
@salmiakki5638
@salmiakki5638 3 жыл бұрын
id say scrap that"in my opinion", but i see you thought of it before me. nice.
@luisflucht6702
@luisflucht6702 3 жыл бұрын
Yes that’s true but if Biden wins, it will get the old livery as far as I know
@stephenrich3029
@stephenrich3029 3 жыл бұрын
The “new design” looks like a modified Transaero livery. JS
@waffelo4681
@waffelo4681 3 жыл бұрын
I hope it wasnt going to be shot down like the mh17
@waffelo4681
@waffelo4681 3 жыл бұрын
@Good Krypollo yea
@_Bosley
@_Bosley 3 жыл бұрын
No mid air refueling is surprising. I can't believe they would do something like that.
@oldcarnocar
@oldcarnocar 3 жыл бұрын
really stupid mistake
@Ccs4646
@Ccs4646 3 жыл бұрын
The likelihood of the President needing it is much less now, especially that it has extended range to where it can land at a safe location for the president.
@VS-et4pn
@VS-et4pn 3 жыл бұрын
@@Ccs4646 The whole point of that was in case there was nowhere he could safely land, so it's still a foolish thing to leave out
@raddad10
@raddad10 3 жыл бұрын
Do you really think the manufacture / military will tell the world all the hidden goodies built into a plane that carries some of the most important people in the Free World. .... come on really?
@neurofiedyamato8763
@neurofiedyamato8763 3 жыл бұрын
@@raddad10 Hidden goodies doesn't mean that there will be mid-air refueling after they explicitly said there won't be.
@odinsameasfirst2640
@odinsameasfirst2640 3 жыл бұрын
The original color scheme should stay on the next Air Force One.
@ezequielalvarenga2031
@ezequielalvarenga2031 3 жыл бұрын
I actually quite like the refresh, it’s a less flashy and simple, but like professional simple.
@mikeelmira
@mikeelmira 3 жыл бұрын
Yep I like the original too
@stevethomas760
@stevethomas760 3 жыл бұрын
AF1 story, Working on the construction of the Atlanta airport years ago Air Force 1 was parked on the tarmac. Went through some side doors to go out to look at it and passed a electrician who was laughing. He told a coworker "you should go inside, the electronics are incredible". This guy starts up the stairs to go inside , Secret Service "what the hell are you doing, get you ass down from there".
@louferrao2044
@louferrao2044 3 жыл бұрын
Saving money is one thing, but forgoing capability by omitting air refueling capability is another. I don't think this was a wise choice.
@kingofcastlechaos
@kingofcastlechaos 3 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't let him negotiate anything. Too many bankruptcies, lies, etc.,
@jameshsu996
@jameshsu996 3 жыл бұрын
The only time AF1 need to use the the refuel function is when US soil is being attacked and need to keep planes in the sky for extended period of time. If that is the case, President most likely will be in the E-4B 747, “flying pentagon” which can stand up against a nuclear blast and has refueling. Regular 747 AF1 can’t stand up against nuclear blast. More reasonable to save $1.4B then having a function that will never be used even in time of war.
@lilyrichter5202
@lilyrichter5202 3 жыл бұрын
I agree if another terrorist attack like 9/11 happens the safest place may well be the skies like they were for George W Bush and goodness knows how long it can stay airborne. also if an emergency happens and the US president was perhaps in Australia or halfway to us in the UK and an emergency happens with no time for stopovers or immediate turnarounds the plane may run out of fuel so definitely not the wisest choice. also what's another billion dollars even if it doesn't get used. safety should be priority for any leader no matter if you like them or not.
@carbonking53
@carbonking53 3 жыл бұрын
@@kingofcastlechaos Trump enterprises has over 500 business in their portfolio. Only six have filed for bankruptcy. That's a failure rate of only 1.2% which is a phenomenal rate of success in the business world when on average 20% of new businesses fail during the first two years of being open, 45% during the first five years, and 65% during the first 10 years. Only 25% of new businesses make it to 15 years or more. Just sayin...
@kingofcastlechaos
@kingofcastlechaos 3 жыл бұрын
@@carbonking53 sure. Can you speak to the percentage of outrageous lies to words spoken? I'm sure you have that already prepared and pre-spun, but go for it anyway.
@ashtronite895
@ashtronite895 3 жыл бұрын
100k!!! Congratulations Simple Flying!!!
@SimpleFlyingNews
@SimpleFlyingNews 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the support. - TB
@SimpleFlyingNews
@SimpleFlyingNews 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the support. - TB
@trevornoah5926
@trevornoah5926 3 жыл бұрын
Classic Kennedy? Or classic Pepsi? I’m partial to the way it currently looks. Nothing political about my decision.
@Robert-xp4ii
@Robert-xp4ii 3 жыл бұрын
The 747 needs to live on forever! Gorgeous plane. I'd love to see it keep the current colors though.
@cplcabs
@cplcabs 2 жыл бұрын
It looks aged and dated compared to the A380
@NeilPrasad_1905
@NeilPrasad_1905 3 жыл бұрын
747 is the right choice because it has a phenomenal cabin configuration
@deepaky09
@deepaky09 3 жыл бұрын
Congratulations for 100K subscribers
@SimpleFlyingNews
@SimpleFlyingNews 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the support. - TB
@juergenwest
@juergenwest 3 жыл бұрын
I would imagine that in air refuelling is essential despite seldom being used, just in case for an emergency
@neptunedawn7121
@neptunedawn7121 3 жыл бұрын
We don't know if President Bush had to use the in air refueling feature when he was flying around during the national emergency on 9/11.
@MisterTwo92
@MisterTwo92 3 жыл бұрын
They have other planes in that case.
@VaporheadATC
@VaporheadATC 2 жыл бұрын
I guess you know more then the actual contracting office that will use the plane.
@jakeoht791
@jakeoht791 3 жыл бұрын
I had really hope I don’t see that boring livery on the plane. The old design was made To be simplistic but also sharp to the eye. The new one isn’t even that symbolic it’s just stupid.
@johnsbox
@johnsbox 3 жыл бұрын
The good thing is that the Queen of the Skies will still be flying post 2050 at least.
@Triggernlfrl
@Triggernlfrl 3 жыл бұрын
No way! All todays aircraft will be gone very soon just like our other things we play with.
@tealmer3528
@tealmer3528 3 жыл бұрын
@@Triggernlfrl The current one is the last -200 outside of Iran... so idk
@JesusIsLord105
@JesusIsLord105 3 жыл бұрын
@@james-baa1249 The world as we know it won't last that long
@woodduck2178
@woodduck2178 3 жыл бұрын
Thomas Jager um, yeah they will be around that long you don't just scrap a VP transport after a few years
@jimmeade2976
@jimmeade2976 3 жыл бұрын
The paint scheme must change somewhat to let people recognize that she's a new plane. Having said that, I agree with most people who commented that the proposed paint scheme is too harsh. I'd prefer something closer to the existing paint scheme, maybe a sky blue belly so that it blends into the sky and makes it harder to see from the ground; adding some red would be nice, but not too much ... maybe just the tail?
@kwgm8578
@kwgm8578 2 жыл бұрын
Anything is OK with me, as long as it doesn't have a silly red cap painted on the hump.
@krugmeister7301
@krugmeister7301 3 жыл бұрын
Looks LOVELY the NEW 747-8
@lifangyang3511
@lifangyang3511 3 жыл бұрын
This The Best Video
@sportsman1237
@sportsman1237 3 жыл бұрын
Keep the existing livery. It is iconic and distinguish from any other livery. The proposed livery looks too much like the last US Airways livery before they became American Airlines.
@heep34987yt
@heep34987yt 3 жыл бұрын
Look at Trump’s private 757 jet... then you will know why he changed the look of the new Air Force One.
@JSB103
@JSB103 3 жыл бұрын
People should start a petition to keep it the way it has (nearly) always been .
@DavBlc7
@DavBlc7 3 жыл бұрын
The new livery also almost much like our own British Airways jets! Copyright law! Please ditch it President Biden and keep the current livery cos it is much more recognisable all over the world including in my country Great Britain!
@therobloxianaviator685
@therobloxianaviator685 3 жыл бұрын
i can imagine a 748 with old school gauges to make it "EMP Proof"
@vaughnhoffmeyer9547
@vaughnhoffmeyer9547 3 жыл бұрын
LMFAO
@YN-io6kj
@YN-io6kj 3 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't be surprised if it would have steam guages.
@nathanishungryanimations7206
@nathanishungryanimations7206 3 жыл бұрын
lol
@captainsinclair7954
@captainsinclair7954 3 жыл бұрын
Damnit, why did I start thinking of Battlestar Galactica?
@nathanishungryanimations7206
@nathanishungryanimations7206 3 жыл бұрын
@@captainsinclair7954 Idk. BSG… mmmmmmmmmm yes
@edgardcolon5763
@edgardcolon5763 3 жыл бұрын
The new plane spend a lot of time near by me back in 2019/2020 in the Melbourne FL. Northrop Grumman facilities
@bitukukuasukgremany3
@bitukukuasukgremany3 3 жыл бұрын
Hope they change Colors back Old design and get rid of the Delta look he pick*
@LibertarianMerc19
@LibertarianMerc19 3 жыл бұрын
I think the aircraft is perfect, but I prefer the current livery.
@desert_jin6281
@desert_jin6281 3 жыл бұрын
Agreed. The proposed livery looks brutish compared to the current one which is rather sleek.
@taylorlatch2635
@taylorlatch2635 3 жыл бұрын
Yeah the current livery looks way better. Hope it doesn’t get the red or dark blue colors
@michaelvickers89
@michaelvickers89 3 жыл бұрын
747 is the most beautiful plane! I wouldn’t choose any other plane to represent the United States! 🇺🇸
@Skirbiy
@Skirbiy 3 жыл бұрын
You are just like me the 747 is the best plane in the world
@Steve_in_NJ
@Steve_in_NJ 3 жыл бұрын
Glad they didn't go with a 737-Max instead! LOL
@ablue5419
@ablue5419 3 жыл бұрын
I’m glad the queen of the sky will still flying around. ✈️
@wolfganglauda5630
@wolfganglauda5630 3 жыл бұрын
747's are the only way to fly on long flights. You have dinner, watch a movie or two, go to sleep - unless you're me. Then you go to the back of the plane where the party is.
@rossdilnot506
@rossdilnot506 2 жыл бұрын
Perfect choice!
@deeser
@deeser 3 жыл бұрын
I actually like the new colour scheme, but fear the actual design won't age well. The baby blue has however become a classic, so tips the point for me
@zixorus748
@zixorus748 3 жыл бұрын
New Air Force One livery looks like British Airways lmao
@jerrydiver1
@jerrydiver1 3 жыл бұрын
You can't always know before takeoff, or at pre-flight briefing, exactly how and where the aircraft will be employed for the duration of the coming flight. These aircraft (and their passengers and crew, for that matter) have to be entirely flexible and adaptable for whatever comes their way, whether on leg one of twelve, or on an extended campaign flight that turns into the last flight at the end of the world. Don't go and think you're qualified to determine what the plane needs and does not when you're not one of the people being paid to think ahead to the unthinkable.
@edeliteedelite1961
@edeliteedelite1961 3 жыл бұрын
Looks good
@ictpilot
@ictpilot 3 жыл бұрын
Keep the blue paint job, it's iconic.
@stradivarioushardhiantz5179
@stradivarioushardhiantz5179 3 жыл бұрын
The upcoming Air Force One/ VC-25B (ex Transaero): 1. N894BA (ex EI-MOW) 2. N895BA (ex EI-TSO) 🤓🛫🤓🛫🤓🛫🤓🛫🤓🛫🤓🛫🤓🛫🤓🛫
@kylecampbell1444
@kylecampbell1444 3 жыл бұрын
I've already saw people making claims its becasue Trumps likes Russia.
@NavyGuy2OO7
@NavyGuy2OO7 3 жыл бұрын
@@kylecampbell1444 Its because Transaero went tits-up before they could take delivery, so the planes were owned by Boeing.
@stephenbritton9297
@stephenbritton9297 3 жыл бұрын
Soon to be re-registered SAM 30000 and SAM 31000. And OF COURSE because Russia... thats ALWAYS the answer, seems some people forget the cold war ended 30+ years ago (dear gad, that makes me old!)
@kylecampbell1444
@kylecampbell1444 3 жыл бұрын
@@NavyGuy2OO7 Yeah I know that but have saw people before saying its Russian ties becasue people try to make something out of nothing all the time.
@paul8727
@paul8727 3 жыл бұрын
I love the 747 so Im glad that the reign of the queen of the sky is not over yet. However, I don’t get it why they didn’t change to a more forward looking and trendsetting type like the 787 or 777x. Also, I think they could overthink the color scheme but hey, guess that’s just a matter of personal taste...
@renehenckens
@renehenckens 3 жыл бұрын
When the president is on board, the aircraft is only designated “Air Force One” if it is an aircraft operated by the Air Force. The helicopters that potus uses to get from the white house to the airport is operated by the marines and is designated “Marine One” And if for some bizarre reason the president should get on board any non-military aircraft (United, American or Delta) it will be designated “Executive One”
@maga6252
@maga6252 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Never knew that.
@roberthudson1959
@roberthudson1959 3 жыл бұрын
@@maga6252 Furthermore, the "(Service) 1" callsign applies to any military aircraft bearing the POTUS, not just the familiar USAF and USMC aircraft. When G.W. Bush flew out to meet a carrier, the plane became "Navy 1."
@skunkbucket9408
@skunkbucket9408 3 жыл бұрын
One thing the video didn't make clear is that the new Air Force One will use the passenger version of the 747-8 (per the Boeing website), though the video most often showed the cargo version. The two can be most easily distinguished by the cargo version's lack of windows on the main level, its much shorter upper deck hump, and the cargo version's three windows per side on the upper deck. I, for one, prefer the new red, white and blue livery, though I would really have loved a more bold and creative stars and stripes design.
@eddietat95
@eddietat95 3 жыл бұрын
There's no need for aerial refueling when, in a national emergency, the President would be moved to an E-4B anyways (E-4s have the capability, too).
@ryannfodrea632
@ryannfodrea632 3 жыл бұрын
Did not know that actually. thanks for mentioning that. I thought mid air refueling was a bad thing to take out to start but didnt realize the president uses a different plane in an emergency. one problem tho. what if the emergency happens mid flight and they cant risk transferring him to the other plane on the ground? I still think they should keep mid air refueling on the main air force one just for the fact that we can never forsee the future. Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.
@eddietat95
@eddietat95 3 жыл бұрын
@@ryannfodrea632 Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that the Air Force would always plan for the VC-25 AF1 to be within range of scores of friendly/secured bases or airports to choose from - impossible to attack all of them at once. Some ground element like the National Guard would secure any of these locations in a pinch. Not only does that lower the risk of an attack upon landing, but the attackers will also be confused as to which specific vehicle the President was transferred to (multiple AF1s, Marine Ones, etc).
@ryannfodrea632
@ryannfodrea632 3 жыл бұрын
@@eddietat95 I suppose ur right. Not all that likely to be an issue. I just thing it would be better to be prepared for the absolute worst. What if a lot of bases aren't operational for whatever reason?
@eddietat95
@eddietat95 3 жыл бұрын
Think E-4B = warplane and VC-25 = comfort plane. The Air Force really doesn't want the President to be on the VC-25 for too long during an attack.
@eddietat95
@eddietat95 3 жыл бұрын
@@ryannfodrea632 No, you're right in a way. In some terrible scenario where VC-25 is either damaged or otherwise out of range of a secured LZ, then it may go down without aerial refueling. That would be more likely abroad where allies may deny airspace as they please. In that case, the Air Force majorly screwed up somewhere else (lack of air supremacy, bad intel/planning/coordination, unchecked airspace, etc.).
@justint1474
@justint1474 3 жыл бұрын
Honestly I can’t think of anything better than this one, I like the color theme, blue gold and light blue
@becazapatero2477
@becazapatero2477 3 жыл бұрын
A jet black would be pretty cool. Lol.
@larryscott3982
@larryscott3982 3 жыл бұрын
Hopefully it isn’t painted yet and the proper paint scheme will be used.
@maxwellheadroom8335
@maxwellheadroom8335 3 жыл бұрын
They’re scheduled for delivery in 2024. They don’t get painted until they’re done. This is 2021. Biden can just tell Boeing to use the current livery.
@eddyeroyal6024
@eddyeroyal6024 3 жыл бұрын
Now we should be able to go back to the old scheme
@larryscott3982
@larryscott3982 3 жыл бұрын
@@maxwellheadroom8335 I was relieved when the subject of AF-1 paint came up in yesterday’s presser. So, yeah I realize paint is a late process. (I didn’t know how far out delivery is.) I’d hate to think that as a change order, changing back would result in a line item extra.
@larryscott3982
@larryscott3982 3 жыл бұрын
I assume it will be the fabulous sky blue. That scheme is on many aircraft, not just AF-1.
@toyistic3294
@toyistic3294 3 жыл бұрын
Congratulations!!!
@SimpleFlyingNews
@SimpleFlyingNews 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the support! - TB
@Eddie220263
@Eddie220263 3 жыл бұрын
Yes, but please leave the "old" livery !!!!
@DonChartier
@DonChartier 3 жыл бұрын
Don't worry, they'll never use the Trump design.
@stthecat3935
@stthecat3935 3 жыл бұрын
@@DonChartier Maybe Biden will change back the livery
@sdjahof1964
@sdjahof1964 3 жыл бұрын
It hasn’t changed. Then again that discussion is probably just getting underway. There is a commission set up to handle the livery of govt planes They review and vote. I’m sure they take in a Presidents wishes. That said. I think it should and will remain as is. The “look” is very powerful yet understated. It shows class. It speaks power and to see it, is to be awed by the beholder
@Pugboy35Man
@Pugboy35Man 3 жыл бұрын
the old scheme look so god dam good
@andrewday3206
@andrewday3206 3 жыл бұрын
The graceful lines of the 747-8 will work brilliantly with the curves of the iconic livery. It’s going to be beautiful!
@portnuefflyer
@portnuefflyer 3 жыл бұрын
The current AF 1 is always so clean! Just gleaming, nothing, I mean NOTHING like my plane! I got to taxi up to 1 once at Idaho Falls, Idaho. The tower asked where I wanted to park, and I indicated near it, and expected to be blown off, but was granted permission by ground and parked almost in the shade of it. Turns out, Clinton was on a raft trip on the Snake River, as was the secret service I expect, so they were slack on security, probably different when the any Prez is onboard! Hard to over emphasize how impressive it is when seen first hand, especially to a patriotic pilot.
@chrissmith7669
@chrissmith7669 3 жыл бұрын
The plane is so different from the commercial version it has to be recertified and that is most of the bill. The price is reasonable for any run of two planes that have to be certified and validated far in excess of what commercial planes are. It’s a huge undertaking. The 787-8 is larger but can operate from shorter runways making it very good for the job.
@jefferystackhouse3434
@jefferystackhouse3434 3 жыл бұрын
I'm pleased to know that the 747 will still be flying, safest plane in the air. I do however wish they had kept In flight refueling.
@jace1113
@jace1113 3 жыл бұрын
I doubt any president would want to spend 20 hours plus on a plane
@cplcabs
@cplcabs 2 жыл бұрын
Safest plane in the air~? Are you off your head?
@billmorris2613
@billmorris2613 3 жыл бұрын
Good evening from St John Parish, Louisiana 19 Jan 21.
@cmj0929
@cmj0929 3 жыл бұрын
Definitely keep the livery looks good and is known worldwide
@beegood9395
@beegood9395 3 жыл бұрын
My favorite is plane is a 747. Excellent choice 747 for Air Force One.
@commerce-usa
@commerce-usa 3 жыл бұрын
The 747-8 was the only choice. The livery may still need some work.
@CenobiteBeldar
@CenobiteBeldar 3 жыл бұрын
The white red and blue pattern looks like something from a 90's movie.
@jwilde801
@jwilde801 3 жыл бұрын
White red and blue? Do you seriously not know our nations colors? It is red, white, and blue. Not white red and blue.
@CenobiteBeldar
@CenobiteBeldar 3 жыл бұрын
@@jwilde801 do you seriously not think before you speak? I was describing the color in order from top down.
@CenobiteBeldar
@CenobiteBeldar 3 жыл бұрын
@@jwilde801 you’re like trump. You talk more than you think.
@korbymarusich337
@korbymarusich337 3 жыл бұрын
What I like is that they like to give the inside away and how it works and how it runs and that's nice for the president when people want to attack him
@slorznovitch
@slorznovitch 3 жыл бұрын
Keep the traditional paint scheme! Otherwise, "If it ain't Boeing... I'm not going."
@clark9992
@clark9992 3 жыл бұрын
"If it ain't Boeing.... I'm not going." Umm....have you been following the aviation news the last couple of years?
@barbusie5217
@barbusie5217 3 жыл бұрын
The color S U C K S ... The old plane was beautiful and impressive... It said something ABOUT AMERICA .. This one looks like every commercial bird in the sky .. .. You just can not improve on perfection, not even with red white and blue .. .. ..
@7474lad
@7474lad 3 жыл бұрын
Looks like an old TWA aircraft, present livery more iconic
@michaelanderson2893
@michaelanderson2893 2 жыл бұрын
You should keep the Air force one that you have now . It would save a lot of money..love the Air force one that you have. Mike Cork lreland
@Vicstarz26
@Vicstarz26 3 жыл бұрын
I’m happy it’s still the 747
@zenixlo
@zenixlo 3 жыл бұрын
100K 🥳🥳🥳🥳
@SimpleFlyingNews
@SimpleFlyingNews 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the support! - TB
@elredlenny5731
@elredlenny5731 2 жыл бұрын
Nice Plane. ☮️
@jamesthepassionateyoutuber9059
@jamesthepassionateyoutuber9059 3 жыл бұрын
Yh I agree that the 747-8 will be great for Air Force One, by and the 747 is also my favorite type of Plane aswell.
@georgemallory797
@georgemallory797 3 жыл бұрын
No mid air refueling is major blunder. Huge.
@ryannfodrea632
@ryannfodrea632 3 жыл бұрын
agreed, just cuz they don't need it frequently doesn't negate it's usefulness. Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.
@mostneuter
@mostneuter 3 жыл бұрын
Well, cutting the cost of the contract has consequences
@scarecrow108productions7
@scarecrow108productions7 2 жыл бұрын
@@ryannfodrea632 plus the GEnx-2Bs are already fuel efficient compared to the GE CF6-80C2 on the VC-25A. Which gives the -8 longer range. Ever wondered how Lufthansa 747-8s make such really long trips? That's how...
@tnkneil
@tnkneil 3 жыл бұрын
Love the new AF1
@kotabear151
@kotabear151 3 жыл бұрын
They should reconsider the in air refueling option. Just because it's never been used doesn't necessarily mean it translates into not needing it. The longer range is good. Friendly refueling area's are good to but that one time it needs to stay airborne during a crisis could come at anytime. Natural or unnatural. 😲🇺🇲🦅
@g-ymmt
@g-ymmt Жыл бұрын
video idea: can you make a video on all the 777's in total length? like the smallest 777 length(ed) plane to the biggest 777 length(ed) plane? if you do thank you
Replacing Air Force 2 Will Be a HUGE Challenge. Here’s Why...
11:29
Coby Explanes
Рет қаралды 609 М.
You Probably Didn't Know This About the Air Force One
9:40
Beyond Facts
Рет қаралды 4,2 МЛН
OMG😳 #tiktok #shorts #potapova_blog
00:58
Potapova_blog
Рет қаралды 3,8 МЛН
A pack of chips with a surprise 🤣😍❤️ #demariki
00:14
Demariki
Рет қаралды 55 МЛН
No One's Buying the 787-10. Here's Why...
14:03
Coby Explanes
Рет қаралды 488 М.
Did Boeing Trick Airbus Into a $25 Billion Mistake?
22:45
Mentour Now!
Рет қаралды 392 М.
Why This Plane Had A Dangerous Reputation: The DC-10
10:30
Mustard
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
The Next Presidential Jet: The New $5B "Biden Force One"
11:56
Long Haul by Simple Flying
Рет қаралды 2,1 МЛН
Why Do Backwards Wings Exist?
13:11
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 4,9 МЛН
Why Did Airbus Put *tiny* Engines on the A340?
10:38
Coby Explanes
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН
THE FLYING INDIAN BUS - INDIGO'S CRAZY 531 SEATER BOEING to DELHI!
14:47
An-225 As A Passenger Plane - Does It Work?
10:26
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 926 М.
My AWFUL Flight on Air India's Filthy Boeing 787
32:02
Noel Philips
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН