Same here!

Anton Babani 1. Don't need to be Catholic to support the Crusades 2. Yes we do, but they are few

3. Don't need to be a Christian either

I value the work done by the crew of Apollo 11 on the moon. So you're saying I'm an astronaut?

Yes you are an astronaut.

Abonnert.

lol wtf never expected to see u here, I didnt even know u were interested in history (except "modern age" one like your video of that dutch naval ship)

Its "Patriot"

Jesper Ternow-Blomberg yeah i have read about it before and he crusaded against pagans in Småland if im right. I am also Swedish.

They weren't too far removed from their pagan roots at this time. I believe this happened around a hundred years after Norway started to become Christianized. King Sigurd later went on a crusade against the pagan swedish, and he did say they fought viking raiders on the way.

Antonio Rodriguez, He is doing videos about the Crusades and other clashes between Christians and non-Christians (Muslims, Pagans, etc.). If you want to see a video about Jan Zizka, you can check the channel History Uncovered.

DEUS VULT, DEUS VULT, DEUS VULT!!! What does that have to do with this guys crusader history videos?

History Time covered that a bit. Eric Bloodaxe supposedly found his end there.

They went back on their religion. Which again was the beginning of the Northern crusades.

They actually were involved in the Third Crusade on a small scale. Some Norse ships helped with the defense of Tyre, I believe.

Jan's books are really terrible. Aside from the historical issues, they're just very boring and flat.

Some accounts have Vikings raiding into the 1100's and after the Christian Kings smashed the pagan arms the last Vikings fled to Iceland and formerly green and forested Greenland.

The English King Harold put an end to the viking rampages

Jesus: And what happened to them? Oh, I forgot. Their leader was killed and they became cheese makers for the Muslims ❤❤❤❤❤❤

That was just some crusaders, in fact a very small percentage of all crusaders in history.

dont like what they did to latin merchants in 1182 too (20 years before 4th), dont like when isaac betrayed richard in cyprus 1189 and definately dont like how we helped alexios 4th on his OWN wish to help free his dad and his throne but byzantine turned on us lol

​@@bruhmcchaddeus413 How can they trust the Europeans when you, Berbers, took their land in the West? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@@user-fl5mq9kp7g exactly lol u explained it furthermore, thats why. Why would we care about east traitors 😂

You're right, someone's history is fuzzy. You need to read about the First Crusade. It was led by a group of counts and dukes. No kings were involved.

That distinction is not clear at all. "It was led by a King". I now understand that you was speaking of an actual co-location with the army. Honest mistake. That term is relative and under personal application. Did Eisenhower lead the Allied forces in WWII? Yes. How much combat was he involved in.........0. There were many kings involved. On the battlefield, there was none. I was hoping you didnt make that abhorrent blunder.

Also, in my first post, I made no mention of co-habitation with the army. "then by whom was the first crusade executed with. Which nations". Being "led" does not require any degree of physical proximity.

agreed

@@RealCrusadesHistory Ahem! You seem to forget that the First Crusade was led by the Holy Roman Emperor, the King of France and the King of England! How could you have missed that???

dude we were at open war with byzantine so many times in history even before 4th crusade lol why would we care? we were business partners at max

​@@bruhmcchaddeus413You mean the pirates, man? The Normans in Sicily were more successful than the Vikings

@@user-fl5mq9kp7g yes thats what I said

@@user-fl5mq9kp7g yes u right, they absolutely were. Vikingg is just job of being pirate yea

the Norse were still viking until 1240ds

See, but there were Vikings before Vikings, as well as Vikings after the Viking age. Check out this thing called The Great Conspiracy where a bunch of northern Germanics went raiding against Rome around the year 370. Many of these northern Germanics settled in northern Gaul. Which later became Normandy. I have Norman ancestry myself, so it’s interesting to me that Rollo was no where near the first Northman leader to settle in Normandy. So when people say that Normans were Frankish-Norse, they’re actually not 100% right in that assessment. Normans were likely a mixture of many kinds of northern Germanic, everything from Saxons to Franks to Norwegians and all manner of other Northern tribes arrived in Gall during this time, the very early stages of the Germanic Migration Period.