Maybe not the best nuclear bombers but I'm in love with flying boats! Aviation without being imprisoned by landing gear and runways unleashes it's full potential
@sheilaolfieway18852 жыл бұрын
almost like the predecessor of the PBY Catalina.
@MegaSaintAugustine3 жыл бұрын
Hmmm ... I wish they had kept one for a museum.
@pauld69673 жыл бұрын
Several years ago I saw what little remains at the Smithsonian's Paul E. Garber Facility. I completely agree with you that one should have been fully preserved.
@SalisburySnake3 жыл бұрын
It's a shame we didn't keep at least one of every plane. There's a lot of great ones that went extinct.
@uberduberdave3 жыл бұрын
The Navy used to have a bad habit of not preserving historic aircraft. As kid in the 1960s my dad took me to see the Norfork Naval Air Station where the famous "Truculant Turtle P2V was on display and a captured WWII "Emily" Japanese sea plane was being preserved. I later learned the base commander wanted them both scrapped. Today, the Turtle is at the Naval Air Museum in Pensacola and the Emily is on display in Japan. Too bad no one intervened for the P6M.
@pauld69673 жыл бұрын
@@uberduberdave I don't recall if I saw _'Truculant Turtle'_ at Pensacola but I have certainly heard of it. Perhaps the move took place after I visited the base. Anyway, thanks for giving me another reason to visit Japan. :-) I hope you and all others reading this have a happy Fourth of July. 🇺🇸
@seantaggart73823 жыл бұрын
@@uberduberdave im saying People please Historians want to know
@johnlewan11143 жыл бұрын
Another plane I've never heard of, thanks for sharing this. You should make a video about the PBY Catalina, an amazing sea plane.
@yogibearthebear67743 жыл бұрын
Arguably the most successful seaplane too
@RickDeckardMemories3 жыл бұрын
The footage of some propeller seaplanes was a bit confusing 🤔
@NinjaForHire3 жыл бұрын
I live in Baltimore and it has always had it's endless locations created and used by the military. The old bases and camps are exciting to tour anytime.
It's like flying fish or dolphin just fly for short moment then surface again
@lorenzocerri31293 жыл бұрын
It's a nuclear poser
@eatcommies13753 жыл бұрын
They should try that with the A10, engines are up high already:) “A swarm of A10s came out of the ocean!!”
@792slayer3 жыл бұрын
And nobody was safe ever again.
@eatcommies13753 жыл бұрын
@@792slayer Peace through strength…
@792slayer3 жыл бұрын
@@eatcommies1375 Peace through superior firepower.
@peekaboopeekaboo11653 жыл бұрын
Large RCS
@jonforris3 жыл бұрын
Looks like an ekranoplan with proper wings.
@AD-zg7fw3 жыл бұрын
I was about to say that. Kaspian Sea Monster was its codename at Langley after it was discovered by the first spy satellite. That satellite was named Corona. Notice how Russia called their vaccine Sputnik V? Weird huh? Edit: reminds me of Saturn V
@jonforris3 жыл бұрын
@@AD-zg7fw Yes, the sea monster v the sea master.
@AD-zg7fw3 жыл бұрын
@@jonforris does this mean the Russians were stealing from 1950s defense contractors? Or was this normal parallel research? I believe the year was about 1960 of the Americans discovering the experimental craft of the CCCP. They also cloned the Shuttle Program with the Buran. They obviously did corporate espionage in the 70s and 80s, perhaps even in the 1950s...
@redsun92613 жыл бұрын
@@AD-zg7fw What do you mean by that? Seamaster is NOT an Ekranoplan, its a jet flying boat. Sea Monster is a different type of vehicle, purposely built to ride on air pressure between a surface and wings. Its not a plane either. If yore looking for the same kind of plane in USSR, see beriev Be-10.
@ronjohnson27943 жыл бұрын
Just said the same thing
@AnMuiren3 жыл бұрын
Such a beautiful bird. I tried to find a model of it, then tried making one from pictures as a kid. My skills as a preteen we're not up to the task.
@alepepperoni25633 жыл бұрын
Lol nice
@musewolfman3 жыл бұрын
If you're still interested in doing that, it looks like Revell released a kit in the mid-1990s. It seems to be selling for $30-35 online.
@MothaLuva3 жыл бұрын
@@musewolfman It’s a remake of a vintage one from the 1960. The scale is 1/box. I have a vacu one in 1/72.
@mikearakelian63682 жыл бұрын
Revell made one....98cents at the time.i made one along with the red snark missile
@KManXPressTheU Жыл бұрын
Revell Put out an Off Scale Kit, Which is Still Available; Mach 2 Has A Kit in 1/72 Scale, But Their Kits are very Rough; Anigrand has A Resin Kit in 1/72, But is Very Expensive.
@SalisburySnake3 жыл бұрын
I want to see the catamaran built from wingtip floats. That sounds awesome.
@fighterjetsensei3 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately, the floats that were turned into a catamaran are in storage and currently unavailable for viewing by the public. Source: I work for the museum mentioned in the video.
@SalisburySnake3 жыл бұрын
@@fighterjetsensei Well at least they belong to a museum. It wasn't clear in the video. Maybe someday they'll be on display.
@fighterjetsensei3 жыл бұрын
@@SalisburySnake Eventually. main reason they're not is a lack of room. The Glenn L Martin Museum is 2 office spaces underneath hangar 5 at Martin State Airport, and all of our aircraft that are on display are on the Strawberry Point section of the airport next to multiple privately rented hangars and the Maryland State Police Aviation hangar.
@thudthud54233 жыл бұрын
A boat built from airplane parts. Awesome.
@waderedekopp47853 жыл бұрын
@@fighterjetsensei any pictures or a link? Couldn't find anything on Google...cheers!
@blacksheep252513 жыл бұрын
Your videos are now my addiction. I LOVE learning about all the planes that I saw as a kid in a book. This is amazing! Thank you
@paulgeorge75573 жыл бұрын
I also love this shit
@MrUNCLESAM843 жыл бұрын
Videos are awesome but the narrator sucks, I don't know what kind of psychological malfunction that he has to talk that quick?! That's why I keep giving them a thumbs down everytime they upload a video.
@blacksheep252513 жыл бұрын
@@MrUNCLESAM84 Odd... he's the only narrator that I've not had to speed up. Normally, I'm at 1.25 or 1.5 speed..
@harrelsonyee44673 жыл бұрын
I'm used to the narrator speed and ngl I kinda enjoy it
@maotseovich13473 жыл бұрын
So much aviation innovation was cancelled because it wasn't necessary in a world with ICBMs... Then again, ICBMs got us into space...
@Joshua_N-A3 жыл бұрын
But standing military still exists even after they made a lot them. I thought ICBM rendered infantry, fighters and ships obsolete because who wants to send paratroopers or conduct an amphibious assault when ICBM could replace all of that? Then drones already came into scene and vow to replace everything maybe ICBMs will be fully controlled by AI.
@bettyschneider52683 жыл бұрын
@@Joshua_N-A be careful what u wish for! AI 🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🛩🛬🛫🛬🛫🛬🛫🛬🛫
@stephenlittle75343 жыл бұрын
Always love learning what's out there. And what happened in the early days. Impressive.
@autofox17443 жыл бұрын
I like these mini-documentaries, but someone REALLY needs to step up their proofreading game.
@steveh17923 жыл бұрын
Talk about the Seamaster, show clips of twin-piston engined seaplane...
@peekaboopeekaboo11653 жыл бұрын
"informative" but not always accurate or correct information.
@maninifarmer13383 жыл бұрын
Why inject irrelevant P5M film into this?
@Bochi422 жыл бұрын
And drop the super serious urgent rapid fire way of speaking.
@pauld69673 жыл бұрын
This and the Sea Dart are two aircraft on my _'Should've been put into full-scale production/use and preserved in museums'_ list. It is a little eyebrow raising when you include film of the Mariner when the Sea Master is the focus. It is obvious that they are two different aircraft.
@musewolfman3 жыл бұрын
There may not have been enough footage of the P6M available to fill the video without repeating too many times.
@pauld69673 жыл бұрын
@@musewolfman I can understand that but would it have killed him to include "...in the same manner as the Martin Mariner..." while the Mariner was on screen? It is also possible that the script is written and recorded before they went looking for the imagery to accompany it and only later realized "oops, we can't find footage that matches." It is a minor thing and it has happened a lot of times in Hollywood films. It is just a pet peeve of mine, like when they're talking about B-17 Flying Fortresses and then show a formation of B-24 Liberators. In that case, it is simply laziness because there is ample footage of B-17 formations in flight. Anyway it's 2 minutes past Midnight which means it is now Saturday and officially the weekend. So hurray!
@MrKentaroMotoPI3 жыл бұрын
An advanced technology bomber designed and built in Baltimore. Can you imagine that happening today? I can't.
@The123485679 ай бұрын
As a kid I remember seeing and hearing the Seamaster. My dad worked at Glen L. Marting in Middle River. I have many pictures of the Seamaster and built the kit years ago. I am now 77 and buiding another model of the Seamaster that was reissued under the Atlantis Model Company.
@DanielBrown-sn9op2 жыл бұрын
The most graceful, beautiful heavy EVER.
@mikelefate16213 жыл бұрын
I'm digging these sea planes. Let's see more!
@Neilistic10013 жыл бұрын
Wow, I had no idea the jet-powered, four-engine SeaMaster repeatedly could "morph" into a propeller-driven, two-engine seaplane (a Martin P5M?) LIKE MAGIC!!! [Nb. Unless, of course, that was the usual "Dark Skies" approach, e.g., we don't give a damn if the photos have nothing to do with the content?]
@ronmaximilian69533 жыл бұрын
Makes the Ekranoolan seem a little less crazy. Speaking of crazy, I still find the concept of aircraft powered by nuclear engines terrifying
@johncurtis27343 жыл бұрын
should make a video on the JRM mars flying boats, great history and some are still functional today!
@The67wheelman3 жыл бұрын
Used by a Canadian forest fire fighting company on Vancouver Island based in lake Cowichan
@johncurtis27343 жыл бұрын
@@The67wheelman Sproat Lake actually, currently not used (haven't been since around 2015 if I recall correctly) and owned by Coulson Group.
@The67wheelman3 жыл бұрын
@@johncurtis2734 knew someone would know more than I, sad our govt never see’s it as a national fire defence tool and never subsidized it. Same old same old
@johncurtis27343 жыл бұрын
@@The67wheelman It really is. I'm currently at our place on Sproat looking out directly at the water bomber base, and I work for the BC Gov so I see firsthand how difficult it is to get them in the air. Really a travesty.
@The67wheelman3 жыл бұрын
@@johncurtis2734 we really could have used it on the fort Mac fire but Notley in her wisdom declined 🙄
@thetreblerebel3 жыл бұрын
One of my favorites. Its so cool!!
@richardsaunders1433 жыл бұрын
I love these videos, but am put off by a sloppiness in the choice of illustrative videos. For example, in several instances in this presentation, propeller-driven seaplanes are shown, having nothing to do with the topic at hand. Certainly, it is hard to find authentic videos, but obviously irrelevant videos should be avoided. An unnecessarily distraction in an otherwise exemplary presentation.
@brenglover723 жыл бұрын
The last time I saw plumes of exhaust like that it was from a VW
@brianknapp62153 жыл бұрын
Now you have to do a video on the SeaMaster's escort- the Convair F2Y Sea Dart!
@andrewlaco17763 жыл бұрын
Only supersonic seaplane I believe.
@samjackson-ni8qi3 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised they don't use sea planes more often nowadays....
@user-cl4kc4st7z3 жыл бұрын
You know, that seaplanes have not only advantages, but also disadvantages. 🤷🤷🤷
@Orphican3 жыл бұрын
@@user-cl4kc4st7z Depends on how you plan to employ them.
@antr74933 жыл бұрын
we have tomahawk missiles and stealth bombers. They use to have float planes off of navy vessels. Now we have helicopters.
@user-cl4kc4st7z3 жыл бұрын
@Frank Dux if you really need something - you will find ways to get it. Nazi trisks to get petrol proofed that. The more important things: it's not so reliable (hurricane or another bad weather transform your cool (and expensive) seaplane into big piece of metal+another materials, that need protection). Another big issue: it's water-oriented (it's really good, if around 71% percents of globe is your airfield, but don't forget about disadvantages: I doubt that water landing didn't influenced it's behaviour in the sky (at least: less speed, higher fuel consumption).
@user-cl4kc4st7z3 жыл бұрын
@Frank Dux I can see 2 main field to operate it: Airstrikes of some coastal areas (if you don't have enough suitable airfields nearby (with wide network of military bases around the world it's rare situation, but if that happens - American army is in troubles because without enough close air support war would be more long and more infantry and marines would pay with their lives for it: I don't rely much on russian sources of information, but Олег Капцов once told about problems with close fire support at the en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beqaa_Valley Situation was solved by 406 mm main guns of battleship, that stayed nearby, but if enemy wasn't in range of naval guns...)
@ARCANEmateCLAN3 жыл бұрын
Always a fan of the background music.
@mpw19863 жыл бұрын
Little known fact about the P6M, Adm Rickover was known to hate the P6M and believed that the Navy had no business having a nuclear capable bomber, surprisingly he had asked to see a demonstration of the plane and it was hoped that after he saw what the plane was capable of, he would give his support and approval of the program, instead he pulled up to the plane,looked at it then drove off, never getting out of his car. Sad to see what could have been.
@laurogarza49533 жыл бұрын
VERY interesting! I have never heard of this effort. Upon first observation of the craft, I was reminded of the akronoplan design but realized this was a flying boat.
@DolganoFF3 жыл бұрын
Maybe the best looking flying boat ever
@DavidFMayerPhD3 жыл бұрын
I always thought that the seaplane technology was cool. Too bad they are almost gone.
@DoctorMangler3 жыл бұрын
I love your videos, I really don't comment much here because you do an immaculate job, clean and concise. The music was a tad much this time at about the 1/2 mark. Your voice and style are all that's needed.
@arraneeno3 жыл бұрын
Waiting for the dark seas episode on that catamaran
@Tinker19503 жыл бұрын
Why are piston engined seaplanes repeatedly interspersed in this report?
@Neilistic10013 жыл бұрын
See my post above. [Dark Skies don't care what it uses for "photo filler." And most "fans" of DS are too ignorant to know the difference. In this instance, you should consider yourself lucky that the "other plane" was a twin-engine Martin seaplane, rather than than something like a Loening OL.
@gjantonio3 жыл бұрын
@@Neilistic1001 not exactly, in their channel description it says that they might not have enough videos / immages of the topic craft, so they use film of similar craft to fill in some of the gaps.
@steveh17923 жыл бұрын
@@gjantonio It's a solution, of sorts. Just not a very good one.
@Mrgunsngear3 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@parrot8493 жыл бұрын
I’ve always considered that seaplane nuclear weapon delivery system as a smart project for its time. It’s deployment and mobile basing were a plus when considering countering an atomic first strike by the Soviets back during the Cold War. Also the aircraft looked very sleek and powerful considering its really just a floatplane. They also were simultaneously developing a tactical seaplane fighter aircraft, the Martin F2Y Sea Dart to complement it’s “sister” P6M floatplane strike bomber but I understand it was also plagued with technical problems.
@carterfickes35053 жыл бұрын
After seeing that imagine a B 52 flying boat
@SalisburySnake3 жыл бұрын
Several flying boats had a greater wingspan then the B-52. The Spruce Goose is almost double. (320ft vs 185ft)
@JFrazer43033 жыл бұрын
There were studies of a seaplane version of the Boeing model 377 (liner derived from the xc-99 military transport, derived from the B-36). The b36 leading edge inlets for the engine cooling were on top of the leading edges, and the horizontal tail moved up a bit. There were studies and flying models of a seaplane C-130, both with stepped boat hull and with big flat skis. See also the YC-134E by Chase/Stroukhoff: a C-123 upgraded with boundary layer control for STOL and un-stepped slightly stronger hull and skis that let it operate from runways or any flat unimproved ground, water, snow/ice, sand, swamp etc.
@chupacabra34643 жыл бұрын
Amazing footage.. thanks!
@jbreefer1483 жыл бұрын
This would have been a great forest fire fighting aircraft.
@YourLordMobius3 жыл бұрын
Holy smokes that's a really great point
@einautofan66853 жыл бұрын
There are the russian Beriev Seaplanes, too!😉 Some with Turboprop, some with Jet turbines...
@Eric_Hutton.19803 жыл бұрын
Fascinating aircraft
@budavargas3 жыл бұрын
Looks like a “watered down” Victor
@jackfinlayson91613 жыл бұрын
With a B52 nose lol
@ronaldschoolcraft86543 жыл бұрын
How many different piston engine powered sea planes are you going to show while talking about the jet powered P6M1? Just curious.
@qkurd91413 жыл бұрын
Big like! Undestructible runways... What a thoughtfulness! Destroying an airport's runways makes all the aircrafts sitting ducks!
@robbabcock_3 жыл бұрын
It was an interesting concept, if flawed.
@bryantblake18773 жыл бұрын
Kinda looks like and reminds me of a MUCH smaller Soviet Ekranoplan, but being able to fly WAY higher and VERY MUCH faster!
@joelrodriguez96613 жыл бұрын
Such a beautiful airframe. Its a shame that the materials and technology of the day hindered its development.
@jakelandry56453 жыл бұрын
Those aircraft are so badass
@stewpacalypse71043 жыл бұрын
It seems like the reason so many planes that never were was because the planned engines weren't available so less than ideal engines are substituted.
@charlestaylor2533 жыл бұрын
That's unfortunately true. It's actually far easier to design a superlative airframe than a suitably powerful and reliable engine to power it...😞
@JFrazer43033 жыл бұрын
For how scary seaplane strike forces are, see the '50s design by Myasischev M-70 supersonic dash seaplane bomber. Seaplane striking forces are dangerous for the defenders and make an attacker's job easier. For every big CVN you can build a dozen LPDs and kits for turning merchant ships into seaplane tenders, and any open water spot can become a temporary airbase with CAP and penetration escort fighters and ASW, AEW and logistics planes supporting a strike. Spot 60 planes and take all of them off at once.
@allgood6760 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for this 👍✈️
@ryanfritts15743 жыл бұрын
The knowledge of seaplane limitations have been known since day one.
@projekt6_official3 жыл бұрын
Neat. I love your videos - thanks for taking the time to make and share them!
@Tyler.i.813 жыл бұрын
Flying experimental aircraft was a dangerous game.
@simondr703 жыл бұрын
Some Canadian Army CH-47 Chinook Helicopter were painted the same scheme as the Sea master for a couple of years, i know so my cousin was a pilot. His best advice when piloting a Chinook -'' trust your rear end''
@nicolasmahdavian17933 жыл бұрын
Another airplane I knew vey little about. Thanks for the great video.
@davidtucker37293 жыл бұрын
Must have been a hell of an interesting company to work for, such advanced ideas and the bravado to pursue some out of the box thinking. Great story, well told
@simonmcowan68743 жыл бұрын
Amazing, very interesting, thank you.
@Armoredunit3 жыл бұрын
The Philippines is developing a sea hovering aircraft will minus the nuclear weapons
@deaks259 ай бұрын
I suspect this would have been an aircraft that became quickly obsolete even if it had made it into service but it's a very elegant looking aircraft, and very sad to hear none survive, especially given it was the last aircraft developed by Martin.
@nigelwalsh8042 жыл бұрын
Couldn't quite understand why some of the footage switched from jet to prop driven. Was this an early prototype produced prior to the jet version.?
@timoakes4503 жыл бұрын
Great concept-love seaplanes
@jonnymoka3 жыл бұрын
Good show dude!
@ramal57083 жыл бұрын
If it was a swept wing then it surely looks like a B1 Lancer taking a surf
@TheMrPeteChannel3 жыл бұрын
Hold on..... This thing was subsonic even with afterburners?
@Justanotherconsumer3 жыл бұрын
Not that unusual for early ‘50’s aircraft.
@DanielBrown-sn9op3 жыл бұрын
It was the 50s only fighters were supersonic.
@foxxster35653 жыл бұрын
The later model with the quoted .89 Mach speed used new engines with no afterburner.
@Idahoguy101573 жыл бұрын
What a shame no prototype was preserved for history
@thedungeondelver3 жыл бұрын
This was such a neat plane.
@paul.bee.3 жыл бұрын
This has always been my favorite plane ever
@lachlanbird96883 жыл бұрын
Thank you for reporting.
@NathanOkun3 жыл бұрын
This aircraft existed solely because the person(s) who created the specification wording in its contract to develop and build it had the word "should" instead of "will" or "shall" in key places, which means that the plane didn't have to meet ANY of those indicated spec results ("It SHOULD work, but if it doesn't, we can give you a more expensive spec contract that says it SHALL work..."). It kept having to be redesigned again and again to finally get it to work at all and even after the fixes it never met them satisfactorily. I was told about this by one of the people who had been involved at the aircraft manufacturer, Martin, design work on this aircraft. This person was giving a talk about how proper spec evaluation is an absolute requirement when doing any contract work. He was VERY serious about how his company had been both an abuser and, later, abused by the mess that this aircraft project became. Essentially, READ THE FINE PRINT AND UNDERSTAND WHAT IT MEANS.
@2fathomsdeeper3 жыл бұрын
They should build a C141 seaplane for fast beach assaults. It would be dammed hard to know where they'd land troops until the plane touches water. Would need a 20mm Vulcan turret to strafe the treeline as it comes in.
@richardkirka59773 жыл бұрын
Why do they include clips of other, propellor, seaplanes? Beautiful aircraft, though.
@derekbowbrick62333 жыл бұрын
Anybody else just watch the nuclear aircraft carrier?
@elizabethbell46973 жыл бұрын
Totally amazing aircraft. Deserved to have one prototype survive. Has anyone noticed that the narrator sounds like Chakotay from Start Trek Voyager.
@edwardfletcher77903 жыл бұрын
Why do you keep showing footage of an old propeller seaplane ??
@kevinyoung95573 жыл бұрын
Great idea
@dc50503 жыл бұрын
The us in 1950: “bombers don’t surf and we think they should.
@deeacosta27343 жыл бұрын
Beautiful plane. Wish they kept one.
@Musicreach1013 жыл бұрын
I love it!
@kresbes72403 жыл бұрын
Exceptional machine. Never should have been scraped. With todays tech these things could erase carrier groups. We could also have airport free travel for all coastal cities.
@krishargadon31623 жыл бұрын
It can still come back!
@biomecraft3563 жыл бұрын
I love the intense beginning music.
@Tyler.i.813 жыл бұрын
Cool looking aircraft
@businessjetguru12983 жыл бұрын
Better. A major problem with flying boats is the suction the aircraft must overcome from the hull. This was a major challenge for the Hercules, popularly known as Spruce Goose. The power needed to get airborne is vast. Another issue is the anhedral wing, which is inherently unstable. The stresses placed on the airframe would almost certainly have made their lives very short before cracks forced them out of service. The faster the flying boat flies, the worse the stress. Flutter and compressibility would make these problems worse, which explains they these aircraft were unsuccessful. The US should have invested in Ground Effect vehicles, which would have been more viable.
@mdhossain43163 жыл бұрын
This concept can be use by some modern navies especially those who has aircraft carriers.... they can use these aircraft's as AWAC's or Aerial refueler or Maritime patrol or Submarine Hunting.... and they should modify them like that can Refueled and maintained by a normal fleet support vessels
@Typing.._3 жыл бұрын
This would be a great coastline transport
@artthurman34463 жыл бұрын
I wish there was more history. My Uncle Bob was the pilot of #2 when it had it's issues.
@a1sloth13 жыл бұрын
This project would seem to be well worth bringing back to life. With modern engines, the 1" skin and the possibility they had come up with an amphibious version, a plane like this might have a life span as long as the B52,
@vogsphere27193 жыл бұрын
Turbo fan engine + sea water...what could possibly go wrong?
@peterga36583 жыл бұрын
dam that looked nice
@hachipanki86343 жыл бұрын
GAIJIN PLEASE
@Gameplaym0ments3 жыл бұрын
Float plane with jets engines oohyea i'd like that
@tammyleederwhitaker6492 жыл бұрын
I just found out about this. Amazing. Wow.
@jacksoncalman33433 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't be surprised if the plans went like this: "This will fly, master" "No it won't, son" "Yes it will, see master?"
@Anlushac113 жыл бұрын
One of the main thing that killed Seaplanes was the improved reliability of aircraft engines. Back in the 30's many Seaplanes could land on water and do repairs while floating or could limp to any number of primitive operating bases on Pacific islands. Now a aircraft can fly as far as it's fuel. Auto pilots take as some of the load off pilots and reliability is hardly a issue anymore due to mechanical improvements and rigorous inspection and safety standards. Last I knew India, Japan, and Russia operated big flying boats for maritime patrol due to their extensive coastlines. I think China is getting to field a new flying boat as well.
@neves50833 жыл бұрын
Now make a video in dark seas about the USS United States super carrier
@ivanvillalobos87193 жыл бұрын
amazing
@account01993 жыл бұрын
I really wish you credited the music. it was nice, this one.