Missing who? What did I miss? Who died?

@@leopasour Nick Barksdale , the founder of the channel. I hope his family, and everyone with SAMA has an enjoyable holidays.

The guy in this video? SAMA I think is a suicide thing? May he RIP I enjoy this channel but am new. The creator life is harder than alot of people think. To anyone else out there thinking of taking their own kife, dont you are loved.

I'm pretty sure he died from sepsis/heart failure. He had kidney failure and reoccurring pneumonia.

@@SamtheIrishexan He DID NOT die from suicide.

When did Nick die?

It's a real tragedy. I'm so sad for his family

I think one could learn from someone who wasn't discussing his own family background.

Where do you get info that he has died?

​​@@boxcutter0Google. He had been very sick for awhile

Sadly he has past away. But his succesors stil keep the channel running.

It's not myth that the gods have communicated with mankind through our history. The true and good Alohiam is the only one you would want to hear from regularly.

Because white washing 🙄

Bra let them tell their lies, it's all the 👿 knows.

They are continuing whiting out everything,wit their lies, it's funny too watch them carry on,these😈 are a lie and the truth just not in them, wow, the jig been up and now their sweating 🥵 😈😈

Yeah the same is in morocco between berber/arabic.

Thats why Serbs, Croats, and Bosnians are primarily Haplogroup I2a, and Bulgarians, Macedonians are split between I2a and J and E1b1a, whereas most other Slavic peoples are overwhelmingly and predominately Haplogroup R1a, minus Northwest Russians who are split between R1a and N. Some people of course are R1a but its only the 2nd or 3rd most common in the area of the former Yugoslavia depending on area, and 3rd or 4th in Bulgaria. Overwhelmingly and close to over 50% of Balkan males are I2a. What does that mean? They were two distinct populations at one time and they simply adopted the Slavic language, absorbed some of the invaders, but their local I2a Y DNA remained predominate. There is a theory that the Serbo-Croatian language and Slavic culture that led to the South Slavic culture originated in what's now the border area of Germany and Poland, having migrated there previously from the Slavic Urheimat near the Eastern Poland and the Baltics, and they are related distantly to the Sorbians whom call themselves Serbi, and live mainly in Germany, but also Poland today, they also call themselves Wends, the theory is some migrated conquered the local Balkan peoples or brought the language with trade or farming etc., and then their culture became dominant, but the genes remained more local. The languages due to isolation branched into another group of Slavic languages, similar to how North and West Germanic languages split but like them share a common origin. The Bulgarian and Macedonian Slavic languages were originally related to that population but their population are almost entirely local Balkan peoples I2a and have significant influence from Turkic, Iranic, Greek, Dacian, and Scythian peoples and J and E1b1a predominate after I2a. The Slavic language became dominant but the people took the name of a Turkic tribe that ruled over them the Bulgars. Similar to how in Hungary the ruling class were Hunnic people related to the Xiongnu of China, but the people took the language of Uralic Urgic migrators/invaders part of this Hunnic coalition invading group whom also included some Germanic peoples and Iranic Scythian type peoples whom despite being Iranic speaking have a gene profile more like Slavs than modern day Iranians, the common people are themselves are primarily of Slavic and Germanic mixed stock with minor Finno-Urgic, Turkic, Dacian, and Hunnic admixture DNA.

These people's were sea peoples traders. Same as today. Chapters. Abra was a woman who got children with ham. Alexander the great. Abraic culture mixed with all races.

Reuben , laid with Jacob concubine. Jacob had 11 boys and one girl . These children had to married the ancestors. Solomon Saul , Reuben , Benjamin was black they had different races don't let me go to far. Some of them was travelers around the sea of Galilee. Solomon had 1000 wives he fell asleep in his sins.So we have to except our ancestors messed up.

Joseph was Germany , Read 1 Samuel 8-10 chapters. Jesus came out of Ruth and Boaz Ruth in the days of Moses herod tried to kill all the babies boys in that day because Jesus ancestors was hiding from the Nazis . Harod 😭 Rebecca and Isaac grandchildren Rachel was terrific for her children dying .Jacob and Esua .

You’re most welcome, thanks for watching!

There has still been major difficulties within scholastic arguments with respect to trade relations and extent. The best evidence with respect to trade and idea concepts seems to be iconography,. Eg: one of the persistent iconographic symbols of ancient Egypt is that of the upraised Cobra. The cobra is not native to Egypt, it is native to India so to use such iconography, must indicate a transfer of concepts between the two cultures. The same holds true of other commercial items such as Frankincense of which the largest source is still in the Afar region of Ethiopia or gemstone from Afghanistan. The evidence has always been there for consideration but has been ignored. The same holds true for the recent evidence of Cocaine in the hair shaft tests done on ancient mummies from Egypt. There can be many sources that can corroborate the narrative of a true history that have yet to be examined or are being ignored. Unfortunately there has been much confusion as to a proper. Timeline of evidence and narrative based against preconceived notions. Some of this is being dispelled but much is still to be accomplished. With respect to the concept within this video, that the formation of Israel was occurring during the Bronze Age collapse, becomes ludicrous. Even the recent report given by Eric Cline of the DNA evidence of the Philistines, ,indicated that there’s a presence from eastern Iberia ( Spain) does need to be considered in the narrative as the Tin mines there would have been greater and more accessible over water than a land route from Afghanistan even if it were through an Indian trading route. More especially, because such a route would not have been affected by the Sea Peoples. There also does not seem to be as yet any evidence of overland trade route between Afghanistan through Megiddo, making a Tamil water route more likely. During the time element involved ( the end of the Bronze Age) it is more likely that the breakdown of the nominal Mediterranean empires would have left another power vacuum into which Israel could come into its own as a power structure especially with the resources of major copper mines in the southeastern region of the Dead Sea Valley. This copper has been metallurgically analyzed and has bot a high concentration of both lead and arsenic. This is another though less durable form of Bronze. Such would be the source of wealth into Israel and a reason for Tamil trading. With possibly very early Iron coming from Tamil sources.

@@walterulasinksi7031 Thank you for a comprehensive explanation! Peace

, Thank you, for your consideration, it is unfortunate when while attempting to make scholastic considerations either lack of evidence or learned biases can turn into a form of conceit, exhibiting a denial of additional evidence due to such bias. It is only when we resist such bias, that it is possible to allow entry of new datum to coalesce within an existing structure that greater strides can be achieved. This is especially important when attempting to give an understandable construction to a time, little understood with respect to causation and having almost no direct evidence. It is only possible to advance speculation to incite more research within accepted disciplines.

@@avtaras It would be interesting for the Chanel if you would make a contribution of the Tamil narratives regarding the interaction with the Mediterranean region for the time period under consideration. While even if the material is limited, the contribution would still add to the overall picture. There are not many that can read ancient Asuka era Sanskrit and even if of later origin, anything that can add to the knowledge of historical consideration of World dynamics.

Tamil Murugan/Mars is the God of the bible.

You’re most welcome! And thanks for your comment and support!

ALL LIES GOD NAMED JACOB ISRAEL WHICH IS ISAAC’S SON AND ABRAHAM’S GRANDSON THE TWELVE TRIBES COMES FROM HIS TWELVE SONS!!!! ISRAELITES ARE A NATION OF PEOPLE NOT A RELIGION!!!

22 And the children struggled together within her; and she said, If it be so, why am I thus? And she went to enquire of the Lord. 23 And the Lord said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger. 24 And when her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her womb. 25 And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau. 26 And after that came his brother out, and his hand took hold on Esau's heel; and his name was called Jacob: and Isaac was threescore years old when she bare them. 28 And Isaac loved Esau, because he did eat of his venison: but Rebekah loved Jacob. 30 And Esau said to Jacob, Feed me, I pray thee, with that same red pottage; for I am faint: therefore was his name called Edom. 31 And Jacob said, Sell me this day thy birthright. 32 And Esau said, Behold, I am at the point to die: and what profit shall this birthright do to me? 33 And Jacob said, Swear to me this day; and he sware unto him: and he sold his birthright unto Jacob. 34 Then Jacob gave Esau bread and pottage of lentiles; and he did eat and drink, and rose up, and went his way: thus Esau despised his birthright. (‭Genesis‬ ‭25‬:‭22-26‬ KJV)

@@lirep6102 wtf are you talking about?????????

10 And God said unto him, Thy name is Jacob: thy name shall not be called any more Jacob, but Israel shall be thy name: and he called his name Israel. 11 And God said unto him, I am God Almighty: be fruitful and multiply; a nation and a company of nations shall be of thee, and kings shall come out of thy loins; 12 And the land which I gave Abraham and Isaac, to thee I will give it, and to thy seed after thee will I give the land. (‭Genesis‬ ‭35‬:‭10-12‬ KJV)

Good point.

Plus Sumeria is the oldest civilization in the middle east. Mesopotamia took it over. They expended down to Israel, through Syria and included Egypt. Abraham was a 1st nation in the bulk of Israel because noone settled the land with wells besides Abraham. The others lived near the river or Philistim in Gaza. Plus his family shepards for 4 generations in Israel/judea/Canaan unchallenged.

I have been looking at the Mesopotamian base 60 number system in Genesis 5 genealogy, which opens up questions to the ages being symbolic or related to a dynasty rather than an individual.

😆😅🤣😂🙃

Lol

Who were the HYKSOS?

@@CharlesSeay the Shepherd Kings who conquered lower Egypt (Nile delta). I think this occurred sometime around 1400BC, possibly earlier.

@@3rdeye671 charles thinking that Hyksos are ISRAELITES.

No, it did not. It meant murderers, robbers, or outlaws. it had no ethnic connotation, it was a class marker, more or less like our "thug," and included people of many ethnicities including some Indo-Europeans and some East Semites. And it wasn't an Egyptian word, it was a Sumerian word (SA. GAZ) translated to "habiru" by the Semitic Akkadians and only used by the Egyptians much later and usually when writing in Akkadian.

It's Aryan not Indo-European.

Non partisan? Dude full of bullshit.

@@coachjones6104 Which part is "bullshit," as you so eloquently put it?

The word "Israelites" (or any cognate) was never used by the Egyptians. In fact there is nothing whatsoever in Egyptian sources about any of the events recounted in Genesis and Exodus.

Well, its' thought, from an academic standpoint, that "Hebrews" or "Israelites" weren't actually, originally "one people" or one genetic cluster, as the biblical narrative suggests. Meaning, it wasn't likely began by 12 sons of a guy named Jacob, nor were they and the rest of the regions populations likely the descendants of a guy named Abraham , nor is it likely that the people of the Afro-Eurasian sphere were descended all from 3 sons of a guy named "Noah". This is all, almost certainly, mythology. Now the mythology likely served an important purpose, to unify, to create one people out of many disparate people with shared experience. Ancient Egypt, who ruled over the Levant, prior to the Bronze Age collapse, around 1200 BCE or so let's say, had numerous colonies. As did the Hittites, Minoans, Assyrians, Sabaeans, Babylonians, Persians and so on. Really, all the major civilizations of the time had colonies. And while this isn't particular to Egypt, Egyptians certainly did not like having to live or work in the "colonies". So much like the Greeks, Romans and most other Empires, whether contemporaneous or after, they would hire mercenary soldiers, workers, bureaucrats, artisans and so on from outside Egypt, to live and work in those colonies. Thus, the Levantine would have been populated by Canaanites, Phoenicians, and other similar indigenous groups, along with the many hired to run and stabilize the area for Imperial Egypt. There also would have been merchants and businessmen from all over and so on. Many, along with the soldiers, diplomats, priests, and those working for Egypt, would have married and started up families, local Canaanite women, or women from surrounding regions of Mesopotamia, Anatolia/Caucasus, Ethiopia, Egypt, Persia and maybe even India and so on. Some of them possibly multiple generations living and working in Canaan. Marrying into the same extended Canaanite families and eventually forming a unique culture. This culture, think of a place like Singapore, or maybe more accurately an Empire like the Ottomans, who used a great many "foreigners" to run its empire. Like the broadly Balkan Janissary. That culture would have had influences largely from Egypt, Canaan, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, but really, with influences from many places, peoples and faith practices. And thus, many different mythologies, religions, legends, customs and so on, not all necessarily meshing. And at this point there were still Philistines and many other small ethnic groups living in greater near East region. Thus when the Bronze Age collapse occurred, Egypt withdrew from Canaan, packed up and left. Which meant there would have been, well, I suppose many hundreds if not a few thousand people, from a diverse array of regions, now established and settled in Canaan. They would have been very interconnected, again, through many Canaanite families which they would be married into. And again, multiple generations of these foreigners living there. Some of course would have brought their own wives and families from wherever. And there of course were probably many Egyptians. Just not mostly, but I'm sure a large portion. And when Egypt withdrew, most of these now established, for all intents and purposes "Canaanites", would have needed to establish order and rule. The archaeology of this time shows a large settler movement in to the hills of Judea and Samaria around this time. Which might have meant these peoples aggregating in that region to avoid attacks, now that the power of Egypt was gone. They also would have then, in order to unify, forged a federation or "group" of some sort. And how do you unify a group of disparate people, with influences from all variety of regions? Well, one way, one of the main ways throughout history no matter where you go, is to devise a common mythology, a unifying mythology. And it's quite possible that is what the "Israelites" were, and that is what the story of Jacob likely was was as well as the Exodus mythos. A unifying mythology, connected through more common regional mythologies, like the flood myths, which were wide spread, or the idea of Noah and his sons, or the idea of Abraham and so on, the rest of the pre-Jacob biblical account likely a combination of various regional cultural, mythological and religious legends, all united in narrative. It has even been suggested that each "tribe of Israel" was a different "people" or "family". At some point in the bible, a Benjaminite is referred to as "the Hittite". Another named "Cushi". Actually a few named Cush or Cushi. There is another part the mentions someone being a Amorite I believe or Moabite. Anyway. Archaeology and biblical interpretation has led to a hypothesis that the tribe of Dan was originally from the Aegean, possibly from Crete or Greece itself, possibly related to the Philistines. For starters, the tribe of Dan's traditional "territory" is thought to be along the coast, directly above the Philistine territory, literally connected to it. Archaeology of that area has uncovered many pots in the Greek style, which isn't common outside of the Philistine and tribe of Dan region. They have also uncovered these bird statues that were very common in Crete. There were also pig remnants, and dna suggests the pigs there were of European origin. There are also biblical passages that kind of isolate the tribe of Dan as being "different" somehow, in a negative way. And then we have the story of Sampson, which definitely appears to reflect elements of the Heracles myth. Just the archetype of Heracles, which is rather unusual for the Levant and Israelites and Hebrew bible. His long hair, his strength, his pulling down the pillars of the building and so on. It's possible that myths of these other lands were integrated into the narrative, Hebrewified of course, but still representative of earlier populations. And this could possibly be done with all the tribes. There are other biblical passages which associate certain tribes, at times with different people, or use names associated with different cultures outside Canaan. While the majority of women and families likely would have been Canaanite, there were certainly a lot of Mesopotamians also. And at that time, capturing women, in conquest or raid was not uncommon either. SO there was probably a fair amount of foreign women. The tribe of Levi for instance, might have been a group of Egyptian priests, who maintained their position through this new unifying mythology. Maybe Benjamin was a Hittite related tribe, maybe Ephraim was an Assyrian related tribe, or whatever. Maybe some from the Caucasus, probably Cush, Ethiopia, Libya, and wherever else. heh, so basically, this could also explain why many different places of origin are mentioned. And why there are multiple connections to and through Egypt and different points. The Exodus was possibly about Egypt leaving Canaan and not Israelites actually leaving the Nile Delta. All though it could have something to do with a memory of the Hyksos, who were a Canaanite people. So memory of the Hyksos era might have informed some of the Israelite history and mythology. The overall specifics are not so clear. But in combination, the archaeology, mythology, and also the genetics, suggest this type of origin for the Israelites. Regardless of what the biblical narrative states, as that biblical narrative would have likely been forged to unify these disparate groups during a time of need. In terms of genetics, we can see a consistent array of male lineages, in Y-haplogroup of the Jewish people, which generally, all coalesce around the Bronze Age. It's thought that there were about 600 founding males of the Jewish population, which seem to correlate across all Jewish groups, with some outliers. But even the Y haplos themselves suggest a diverse array of people from different regions. And don't tell the American "Hebrew Israelites" this, but there were probably even "black Israelites" especially from Cush and Ethiopia. Maybe not a ton, but likely some at least. And another hypothesis is that Levites were a combination of all the tribes. As priests were originally supposed to come from the eldest sons. Which at the time of "Moses" was granted to the Levites. So perhaps they took representatives of all the tribes, and joined them together as "brothers" as Cohen/Levites. Or perhaps Cohen were a specific group and Levites were built around them so that at least all "tribes" were represented within the Levites, who would of course be living among all tribes. Now certainly, I think some of these people would have had a nomadic lifestyle or nomadic traditions. Almost certainly. And as he said in the video, Habiru probably doesn't mean all Habiru were Hebrew, but certainly, many Hebrew might have been Habiru originally. Same for say the Hyksos, I think around 1800 BCE. And we see at least some WERE nomadic, in the story of David and the presence of shepherding in general. Further, EL, YHWH Elohim and the Israelite God is clearly a combination or different variations of previous, Bronze Age Canaanite pagan gods. There seems to have been a god YHHW I think it is, which was followed by a nomad people of the Negev/Sinai region. Which is possibly where YhWh comes from. On this last part, I'm not 100%, but just a theory. Well anyway, you get the idea. Hope that helps a bit.

egypt?!

​@@jessereichbach588 incredible.. Jordan Petersons study of Genesis matched beliefs in Hebrew were very similar to Egyptian Mythology specifically the Death of Osiris at the hands of his brother Seth but then brought back to life by his son Horus who descends into the underworld to retrieve his father giving him his eye and restoring the kingdom. What fascinates me if Petersons musings are right...then while Egypt views the mythical figure restores the old kingdom with new vision the possible Egyptian priest now Levi's crafted the opposite perspective of this Civil War. They craft a Mythology of a corrupt king and a mythical figure and guardian escorting these priest with brash new ideas into Cannan free to practice their new ideas and mixing them with the many nomadic tribes. This could have been the impetus to settle and conquer the land with divine purpose motivating the destruction.

@@saquist a very astute hypothesis. Certainly plausible.

Plus different diaspora means we are different but the same. Like Sephardic versus mizrachi versus Ashkenazi

Glad you think so! And thanks for commenting! We have many episodes coming!

Archeology is full of long draws of the bow. Who knows if the claims on the Stele were wring in the first place. We can expect Israelis somewhere at sometime in Israel to wear Canaanite clothing, even to use their culture, but maybe they thought they were describing Israelis but were describing Canaanites. It's sort of that way, and the Egyptians would not be above propaganda, and over or understate things. If only they left some DNA with it, in a preservative in a samples container... You have to objectively look into things, to state what is known, and offer an opinion on it. But here, I'm finding my comment is being deleted for some strange reason of, probably of minor disagreement on interpretation of some little part of it. As when I thought I accidentally lost it, I posted a part copy by mistake. And that was highlighted, but when edited that to a full version it got deleted.. The present researcher states this and that, but I can see problems with it and have seen what others are claiming.

@NILE VALLEY TELEVISION what about the finding of the Dead sea scrolls they predate the torah for at least 1000 years.

Aryans in India didn'T come from anywhere.

@@punchipoint8457 Yes, they did. The evidence is overwhelming. Sorry if your nationalist and racist propaganda says otherwise.

💯 %. It’s like lights goes off and when it comes back on people have stories of magical things happening to claim land and righteousness. It’s the recipe for cults to start (100 years before they become religion. “Difference between cult and religion is 100 years.” It’s the time and disconnection. Reason North Korea considers their leader divine and a God is because they are disconnected from the world that could tell them they are deluded, which to be fair we are all deluded one way or another. But to be fair Judaism is a religion like all others of the ancient world that simply filtered through to the new world thanks to the relevance Christianity gave it. Despite how bad Christianity has been to the people historically, it’s been very important and necessary for the ideology to survive and grow. When the 2 major religions of the modern world point to one ancient tribal religion its value increases. Reason Zoroastrianism (much bigger ancient religion) only has 200K followers today but Judaism has 15 mil. So fascinating how evolution plays out.

Also “40 years” for a new generation that did not see the sea split moves in from the mountains or dessert is very conveniently a story. It’s telephone game.

​@@punchipoint8457 YES they DID. recent genetic evidence PROVES BEYOND A DOUBT the Aryans were a result of European steppe people migrating and replacing the local male population with r1b1, your people descend from Europeans, get over it. You can thank us for giving yall the culture to build your civilization 😂😂

Study the Ugaritic Hittite texts and those from other civilizations that had a real presence in the Levant, which the Hebrews never did. It is a mythological historical fiction that never happened the way it was written. It is a 'narrative' based on no truth associated with the alleged Hebrews. There are no scriptures older than the Dead Sea Scrolls which are very late compositions, late 2nd century BC to 2nd century AD. The western mind is controlled by an utter fiction.

@@endallbeall7642 utter fiction.

@@canadiankewldude Based on what? Your religious brainwashing?

@@endallbeall7642 Much archaeological evidence has been found supporting the Scriptures. Nothing has been found to disprove said Scriptures.

@@canadiankewldude So your answer would be yes. Stay ignorant and on your knees. You can't even prove that Jesus lived. No archaeological evidence for his existence whatsoever. You are living an illusion based on faith because there is no truth to support it. The religion was framed around an alleged vision by Paul, of a man he never laid eyes, on and claimed he was Jesus. FACT.

They picked up the flood myth during the 1st Babylonian exile. Much of the old testament and specifically genesis was written during that period. The exiled jews likely had documents from the fallen kingdom of Israel and ancient texts and oral history from Judah. My theory is once exposed to the ancient zoroastrian religion and stories like the epic of gilgamesh, they were compelled to seriously write down their myths and incorporate them into the wider mythology of the region. Likely needed at a time where the elites were no longer in the Levant and also acted as a way to keep the exiled elite jews from losing their culture and identity. In whole they definitely weren't from messopatamia but much of the Bible was written there and inspired by stories like the Epic of Gilgamesh

Check this video out! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m8t9f9yaq9CniIU.html

That’s addressed at the end! Happy to help!

Hebrew is the oldest, which means "of or sons of Eber". Israelites comes later when they start to form a nation state. Jew originally was only that of the Tribe or Kingdom of the Judah. Later it was expanded to refer to who ever was carried away to Babylon. Still later it was expanded to those conquered by the Maccabees and or those of the Roman province of Judia. So it historically context is key. Today we throw it around like a catch all, but it's not that simple.

As far as I know youre not wrong in saying that the israelites originated from the hebrews, or maybe evolved. The hebrews werent a stationary group and seemed to have included different groups. The israelites is a reference to a specific hebrew group that settled and eventually became israelites.

As Dr. Maeir states, stratification of the Biblical text is difficult, so staking a claim on a particular verse is problematic. That said, Joel, Amos, and Hosea likely are very old, ca. 8th century BCE, and it's possible that Deborah's song (which mentions each tribe by name) and Miriam's song are very old too. Dr. Harold Bloom believes that that part of the Hexateuch and Kings known as J dates back to the court of Rehoboam in the tenth century BCE, but it could really be much more recent, by hundreds of years. So all considered, we have the Merneptah Stele from ca. 1200 BCE, as Dr. Maeir mentioned, likely mentioning Israel, and hundreds of years before the terms "Hebrew" or "Jewish" are securely attested. Now there is the term `apiru showing up in Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Ugaritic, Hurrian, and Hittite tablets from 18th to 12th century BCE. The Hurrian Tikunani Prism from the 16th century BCE mentions over four hundred `apiru; more than half had Hurrian names, fewer than half Semitic. That said, some of the characters showing up alongside David in 2 Samuel-Araunah, Achish king of Gath, Ittai of Gath, Talmai the king of Geshur, Uriah the Hittite, Sheva, possibly David himself-seem to have Hurrian names, and the way of life David is said to have had-nomadic, shepherding, warring with the city of Jebus-reflects the way of life the `apiru are said to have in all those tablets. So it is possible that the post-exilic term "Hebrew" (meaning "across") is a reimagining of a term that had a markedly different meaning a thousand years prior. The semantics could be identical, or it could be folk etymology, as is so much in the Bible (e.g., Moses, Israel, or the benediction of Jacob, in which he explains the meanings of his sons' names). If the sense was consistent over the millennia, then "across" could mean across the Jordan, the Euphrates, Sinai, alien, transporter, or outlaw. Israel was more prominent than Judah during the Assyrian conquests of the eighth century BCE, so it got more attention and was destroyed. Then, in the seventh century, Josiah king of Judah entertained a pragmatic alliance with the Chaldean war against the Assyrians in order to increase Judah's prominence, but was slain by Pharaoh Necho on his way to assist Assyria. Chaldea in fact prevailed, but became so oppressive that Judah revolted and its leadership exiled to Babylon. After Babylon was destroyed, Cyrus, Cambyses, and Darius likely allowed the Judahite exiles to narrate to them to what prior condition their land should be restored; hence the descriptions of Solomon's splendor, and why the whole province of Israel was named Yehud after Judah; this is where we get the term Jew. Judah's etymology is said to be "thanks," but may in fact have been "ravine." The tribe of Judah is not in Deborah's song.

Canaan was Ham’s son, ham was Noah’s oldest son. Abraham was from the bloodline of Noah’s son Shem. The Israelites who came out of Egypt, with Moses, were Abraham’s 12 great grandson’s bloodlines.

@@Angelica-fy9fr If this was a true story, what happened to the bloodline?

@@Angelica-fy9fr That's all assuming Noah was even a real person. I would argue that he was not and I do have evidence for saying that. The original flood story was on clay tablets made by the Sumerians thousands of years before the book of Genesis was even written. In the ancient flood story written about by the Sumerians, The God Enki created us and made us in the gods likeness with their knowledge which angered Enki's brother, Enlil. Enlil wanted to destroy us but Enki who loved us had a man named Upnapteshim build a boat to save humanity. Enki is likely who evolved into Lucifer as Hebrews became influenced by Zoroastrianism from Persia. So yeah, the much more ancient story of Enki, Upnapteshim and the flood evolved over thousands of years into the Hebrew story of Noah & The Ark.

@@TempleOvBlackLight so the evidence that Noah didn't exist is another myth?

@@roylle6346 Absolutely. The original myth was written about thousands of years before the story as told by the writer of Genesis.

Through Aramaic. Some of our Jewish texts are still in Aramaic

I actually just got a yeti and the sound has much improved! We have a whole series coming but the recordings that will shortly follow are with the other and so I apologize in advance, eventually you will notice a far better sound!

So it is called a kipa. I always wondered what they were called. Why to they wear it?

@@mdb1239for religious purposes

@@kristofjarder1300 Does one usually wear it once a week; or for special Jewish holy days; or whenever one feels like it.

Religious purposes 😂😂. Rather vague. They wear it as a reminder that theres someone higher up than them, yahweh in this case.

@@bedevereknight4992 Thanks.

Sound like he's saying those people and Israel are not the truth Israelites of that land

@@eldermorris5221 Maybe the people living in the Gaza Strip are the Israelites?

@@eldermorris5221 Yeah, the DNA shows the mostly closely related people to the ancient Israelites to be the Palestinians. Which I have been considering as possible for a few years.

Because they weren't there in Moses' time either, they weren't there until the Iron Age. In the time when Moses is supposed to have lived the Chaldeans lived in the Levant and had nothing to do with southern Mesopotamia.

Why Noah and not Abraham.

​@@user-gh6hc9ch4zBecause Abraham didn't like long sea voyages... and Noah preferred boats of greater accommodation. Why don't you rid yourself of the tedium that comes with biblical illiteracy.

Hebrew just means black it’s a race just like gentile black or white something this generation made up

Totaly confusion presentation

@J.P. Ah, that is very interesting. So in a sense that suggests that semite peoples also have indo-germanic origins, doesn't it?

@J.P. It's amazing. I have a Sorani Kurdish friend and I can relate quite a few words to French, Italian and sometimes to germanic langauges. Kurdi is closely related to Farsi and Farsi in turn is related to Sanskrit, Hindi and Urdu. I also remember that it were the Persians who liberated the Hebrews from their expulsion to Babylon by the Assyrians and that the Persian Shahmsa Shah ordered the reconstruction of Jerusalem and the Temple. Looking at history, I sometimes wonder why on God's green earth people fight eachother over holy ground, places and scripture or man made rules. It all seems utterly pointless, pretty much like the wheel of eternal return (birth, life, death, rebirth) in the vedic scriptures. It seems we're doomed to repeat it witthout end until we learn we're all brothers and sisters. Prophets who tried to shine that light never were honored in their time, were they.... What a waste!

Yes the christens have done nothing but cause lies and misinformation in every time line throught out history

That depends. Harvard is a Christian school. There’s a big difference between a school that has so association with a religion and one of these ridiculous shit tier schools tied to televangelist types.

1 Maccabees 3:48

Exactly seems like they could be the key to a lot of things. Homer constantly references a people called the danaoi in his epics. Saw a wonderful documentary correlate danaoi art to the construction of the ark of the covenant in palestine. It was built by the tribe of dan in the bible. I wonder if they also have anything to do with a part of the sea people's called the denyen

@@TheMrgoodmanners yes I agree. The documentary you referenced was made by the person I mentioned previously Simcha Jocobovic. He had an archeology tv program that was very interesting, although he put to much weight on the biblical narrative in my opinion. The program was called "the naked archaeologist" I definitely recommend the show though. If your a fan of this presentation I definitely recommend looking at the O.I. KZfaq channel. The OI is the oriental institute, through the university of Chicago, one of the best American archeology institutes. Dr. Aren Maeir had a great presentation there a few months ago. Also recommended Pennsylvania University's channel lots of great archeology presentations as well

@@johnmcarthur1658 thank you, I will look for that. I dont recall reading about it from that series. Although it's been years since I looked, i know its updated regularly. Fascinating! Always enjoyed that part of Egyptian history, I just wish the Egyptian government would allow proper excavations of Avaris. Manfred Bietak has to walk a fine line at that excavation, a shame

The tribe of Dan are the Ethiopians ok.... Don't listen to these identity thieves. m.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gciJjdKryq-7hmw.html

@@TheMrgoodmanners look these men are frauds, the info is now available. The Israelites was already been found since 1492. They are lying through their teeth. Watch and learn m.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gciJjdKryq-7hmw.html

Thank you so much this is a very important Information for me because I remember many year ago in my village- MBEYA-TANZANIA when I was at age of 8 years old I remember one of my neighbours they gave his son this name SAKAE, which in Swahili language we use to call him SAKAI. So I thank GOD today I find where this name came from. Thank you

Utter bollocks

My pleasure! And thanks for watching!

It is called Tribal War and is provided by KZfaq to creators but I can't remember who the artist is unfortunately?

Realy? Ever heard of the greek translation Phoenicia and Phoeniciens? Today, of course, it's a neutral expression, meaning all the people, who lived in Canaan, which, by the way, is just a geographical expression, a little bit like we speak of the Levante or the middle east. Within the Bible the use of these expressions is more complicated.

@NILE VALLEY TELEVISION Germans do not call themself 'Germans' or 'Allemands'. That doesn't mean, that there are no germans in the middle of Europe, they just use the adjective 'deutsch'. Furthermore there are a lot of Europeans. They are Europeans, because they live in Europe, between the atlantic ocean and the Ural Mountains. They don't need to belong to a certain nation or the EU to be Europeans. And there have been people living in Canaan. And despite the question, which names they used themself, they all can be called Canaanites. Furthermore we know from ancient sources, that the Phoenicians called themself Phoenicians at a certain point of history. We don't know if they did so, because the Greeks and Romans did so or because they spoke the western Canaanite dialect or because of living in that area, or because they thought of them as one people. But, as shown above, it is not important, how they called themself or which peoples lived there. They can be called Canaanites, because they lived in Canaan. And archaeological finds prove, that the region was inhabited in ancient times. As you will notice, the bible uses the term differntly: Within the bible Canaanites are people, who live in Canaan without being hebrew. But geographically the Hebrews must be included in that term. And even the biblical term doesn't define their nationality: According to the biblical use of the word, they had just to live in Canaan and not being Hebrew to be Canaanites.

I had heard that before, it was because Juda worshiped Yahweh and Israel worshiped El.

holy shit thats rapey

@@punkykenickie2408 How do you figure that?

@@lirep6102 she GAVE HIM her servant?! what the heck?!

@@punkykenickie2408 That doesn’t mean he raped her

Their mothers

The simplest explanation is that the authors were completely ignorant of the then ancient history of southern Mesopotamia (as well as their own land and Egypt) and had no idea that it had ever been inhabited by anyone other than the Chaldeans. They don't seem to be aware that there was a linguistic divide between East and West Semitic languages as far back as the Bronze Age, or that "pharaoh" was not used as a title for Egyptian monarchs at the time the Exodus is supposed to have occurred, or that Hebrew was very closely related to other Canaanite languages and not to the language of Ur of the Chaldees, or that their own ancestors had been polytheistic not too long in the past, or that Yahweh and El/Elohim had been different gods at one time. So it may very well have been based on an older oral tradition - I'm pretty confident that it was - but that doesn't mean that tradition was transmitted accurately at all.

@@brucetucker4847 IDK who your sources are, but literally just believe the opposite of what they tell you and you'll get it right. Because somehow all 3 points you just spieled, not only lack proof, but were flat-out wrong. Very, very wrong.

@@jlupus8804 My source is called having an education. Along with my B.A. in History I picked up a Religious Studies minor mostly from studying the above history.

@@brucetucker4847 Yeah no offense, but maybe ask for your money back

@@brucetucker4847 If what you say is true, you should be the last one to jump to conclusions on bronze and iron age Israel. Or it's probably not your main field? Either way you're not the first person to claim a BA and get a bunch wrong.

They lived in the dessert for 40 years , Armana is in the dessert and it fits the story, mabey Thutmoses lll, inslaved a large part of the people of Jericho. And Akenaten left with "his" people the slaves that raised and protected him.

@@m.j.debruin3041It's pretty amazing that the walls of Jericho tumbled down and made a ramp for Israelites to walk up. The burned destruction layer shows large jars full of burnt grain. The pottery dating of this destruction is around 1400 BC. The ruins of Jericho bare this out -- verifying the Biblical narrative. Oh apparently on section of the mud brick walls did NOT collapse -- supporting the narrative that Rahab escaped the collapse of the walls. In Joshua her house was against/part of the wall.

So it seems that the old writing's tell us about our history and it's a mesmerising story, better than any Hollywood movie.

@NILE VALLEY TELEVISION Since you won't take proof - the digs at Jericho, at Yemen that have taken decades. Guess your mind is already made up. So no use discussing facts with you. You won't even lift a finger to do a simple google search or KZfaq search. OK your mind is already made up -- don't bother with the facts. I get it.

@NILE VALLEY TELEVISION Egypt and the Farao is mentioned in the bible, I'm not religious ... just saying.

Noe 950, Sem 600 (semitic), Arfaxad 438, Sala 433, Heber 464 (primer hebreo), Peleg 239, Reu 239, Serug 230, Nacor 148, Tare 205, Abram 175 (Abraham), Isaac 180, Jacob 147. Jacob = Israel (padre de las 12 tribus). Israel quiere decir "El varon que vio a Dios".

I had seen awhile back (and please forgive me, but I cannot remember the source) that while peoples of Jewish heritage in areas of what is now Iran and parts of what might be called Central Asia, or on the Eastern Coast of Africa do show genetic DNA that correlates to Jewish peoples of Palestine prior to Emperor Nero's sacking in 70CE... the vast majority of Jews coming from Central and EASTERN Europe did NOT show similar DNA? So then, WHERE DID this very large European Jewry come from??? Whenever I have attempted to query the possibility that these were peoples from highly persecuted non- trinitarion or other minor religious, or even atheists during the dark ages of Catholic Inquisitions that sought refuge by migrating into Eastern European Jewish communities --- I have been most vehemently attacked as being anti-semitic? No one seems in any way willing to pursue this possibility...

@@arroyodave5845 Significa Dios lucha, Dios manda, Dios gobierna.

@@adrianalainez8499 Hola Adriana, sabes como se escribe Israel en hebreo? Estudia esa palabra en hebreo Ish - ra - el. Shalom

@@arroyodave5845 no es Ish. Que ignorante. La estas pronunciando como la gente lo hace ahora. Sabes que es una lengua muerte que no tuvo continuacion por siglos. Y que se revivio despues de mas de casi 2000 años. Y los Europeos le pusieron sus sonidos y no los del Medio Oriente originales. La Isra significa pelea o gana o gobierna sobre. Y el el obviamente es Dios. Pero no habla de Jacob sino de Dios mismo. Dios gobierna.

I think the Exodus narrative is derived from some kind of oral history of the Hyksos, who were Canaanites. It was probably originally an oral history of the dynastic lineage of Israelite or Judean leaders tying them back to the Hyksos in Egypt. The majority of the population was probably continuous from the earlier Canaanite population with just some prominent families perhaps being exiled Hyksos nobility.

Everyone should be able to do it that would be awesome n informative.?goodidea

My European Family by Karin Bojs tracks some North African Berber DNA to ancient European crossing the 8miles at the Straits of Gibraltar.