Some people become quite upset when I refer to Mr. Justin Welby as the Archlayman of Canterbury.

Michael Davies is too good. I love listening to his talks

Fantastic.

God Bless you!!!

Thank you for this

@Michael Davies - Your thoughts on the Anglican Ordinariate allowed to enter the Holy Catholic Church by Pope Benedict XVI in 2014?

In Davies book, “The Order of Melchisedech” he gives step by step examples and proof about the Anglican orders being null and void of confecting true priestly ordinations for the priesthood. Then Davies goes into explaining how the post Vatican II ordinations are severely compromised and doubtful, with key phrases and sacred words being purposely dropped or omitted; yet without out-and-out telling us that the (new rite of ordination) has a serious chance of being invalid. Davies nullifies his excellent point with examples by refusing to tie it together at the end or just say it. He chickens out out of political correctness or fear.

He’s mistaken on one point: when the Old Catholic bishops took part in the consecrations, they did it separately from the Anglican bishop(s) and using their own form (the same as it always had been and acceptable to Rome) in Latin.

Well researched work by Michael Davies, once again. Good talk and GOD bless!

Henry 8 wanted divorce and remarriage end up remarriages of 6. Henry 8 is a political king and also declared himself leader of the Anglican Church.

Marvelous history

By those antiquated standers the Apostles and their successors would have null and void Orders and the whole house of cards comes crumbling down.

Sounds like the novus ordo situation.

Great uploads lately!!! Thank you.

It was heretic Thomas Cranmer who is responsible for creating an invalid order within Anglicanism,

The Anglican ministry is both the leadership and agency of Christian service in the Anglican Communion. "Ministry" commonly refers to the office of ordained clergy: the threefold order of bishops, priests and deacons. More accurately, Anglican ministry includes many laypeople who devote themselves to the ministry of the church. Ultimately, all baptized members of the church are considered to partake in the ministry of the Body of Christ. " ... [I]t might be useful if Anglicans dropped the word minister when referring to the clergy... In our tradition, ordained persons are either bishops, priests, or deacons, and should be referred to as such." Each of the provinces of the Anglican Communion has a high degree of independence from the other provinces, and each of them have slightly different structures for ministry, mission and governance. However, personal leadership is always vested in a member of the clergy (a bishop at provincial and diocesan levels, and a priest at parish level) and consensus derived by synodical government. At different levels of the church's structure, laity, clergy and bishops meet together with prayer to deliberate over church governance. These gatherings are variously called conferences, synods, convocations, councils, chapters and vestries.

they are not valid just by the fact of the statements at the back of the book of common prayer. get off it if catholic bishops have said so it's BS.

So if an Anglican priest is ordained in the Sarum Pontifical, it would be valid?

Orders can only happen in the one true apostolic church. Outside the church, there are no sacraments. So, all this fuzzy speculation about the validity of schismatic orders is a waste of time. The Orthodox church didn't even accept Rome as a church, so it didn't accept any of their orders or sacraments. Sadly, that changed in the last century due to modernist influences in Orthodoxy.

You can not have version of churches: Orthodox, Anglican, Lutheran, Protestant. No Eunuchs - New Wine - Earthly Church that belong to apostles. and Children of Abraham and Sarah - Old Wine - The Promise. Luke 22:29 And I confer on you a kingdom, just as my Father conferred one on me, Luke 5:39 39 And no one after drinking old wine wants the new, for they say, ‘The old is better.’” You see because the rules do not apply to children of mother Sarah same as the earthly church which are heavier. Romans 4:4 Paul was a servant and He stood with the church. However he will revive a share of gentiles those who beloved the message. But No baptism there. Baptism belongs to the church. Matthew 18:17 If they still refuse to listen, tell it to the church; and if they refuse to listen even to the church, treat them as you would a pagan or a tax collector.

I've been ever religion Catholic and Baptist for over 40ys Seven day Adventists church of Christ, God Mormon Methodist Jehovah witness protestant even China church of ALMIGHTY God none compares to the Anglican Church at least my providence church I've even been through all bible studies but what I've learn most is that all Christians have forgotten John 17 the prayer Jesus prayed to The FATHER In Jesus HOLY Name HALLELUYAH AMEN!

200 Years had passed and 14 popes prior to Leo XIII did not make that declaration. It was not "ex cathedra" when the pope made it. The pope committed the heresy of *donatism.* When the Apostles ordained the first episkopos, they _did not do what the church has always done._ All that is needed is a validly ordained bishop and priest laying hands on the ordinands head with the intent being that he is to be a priest and the HOLY SPIRIT does the work. Lest we forget, the first Anglican Bishops were, in fact, validly ordained by the Roman Catholic church. The HOLY SPIRIT, not the pope, ordains priests and bishops.

The idea of one church declaring the orders of another church “null and void” is arrogant nonsense. God does not play games with the salvation of millions of His children.

What a bunch of arrogant crap, the idea of one church declaring the orders of another church null and void. With the ordination of women and especially the elevation of women to the episcopate has rendered them null and void according to St. Paul.