Can't wait to see that! Is it for your podcast or for this channel?

I saw your comment that you were writing a helicopter vid. When is the planned release?

Two of my favorite channels collaborating. Awesome

Nice video. I'm looking forward to your next video. Could you make a video about the X-31? Would be very interesting XD.

I won't leave lmao we go from excited comments to this garbage

I'm a former engineer on the F-35, and I can assure you, magic is a key ingredient. ;)

@@damightymage5049 name checks out

@@RealCosmosry i am tempted

@@damightymage5049 if the surface on which the plane is landed is provided by high suspension ..the hard landing can be avoided...??

I am pretty sure your flight simulator games uses magical numbers and codes to make the plane fly and do things.

Paul Fletcher and it was us brits who made it as well as the first jets

@@YorkshireMemes then we stole it from you lol

JOHN-117 not really, britain got rich as fuck for selling America the harrier and jets to the rest of the world

Jack the lad except the first model British Harriers were fucking terrible, and more than half of the Marine Corps Hawker Siddeley AV-8A Harriers crashed. It wasn’t until McDonnell Douglas redesigned all the flaws out of the shitty British version that made the Harrier into the badass machine we know today

Elite Warrior007 a quarter actually crashed and they wasn’t too bad

Skillshare: Am I a joke to you?

Nord VPN: Am I a joke to you?

Squarespace: Am I a joke to you?

Well its not free

somerandomguyo_ dark mode hair

*It's called science!*

it's called Sci-noFi :D

well technically sci-fi is like the foundation of real life science until scientists/engineers crack down the theory behind it

Of course the Rolls Royce F402 pegasus. The best jet engine ever. The best sound too

Pretty much.

I have been playing KSP for a few thousand hours at this point and I still envy the harrier

KSP and Hearts of Iron 4

It's a British plane...

ghost 1828 yes the natter is a British plane

*actual footage of someone who crashed the hydra for the humane labs heist into the carrier*

Aight boys I'll take the hydra

Johnny K that noob that always die

When you rich but you still need to buy some snacks cuz you ain't a CEO

And the avenger at 2:38

It is 1944 dude

Russian accent: Safety is number 1 priority

I just love how in 1940s safety was just not a thing that was taken into consideration most of the time, humans were basically like Kerbals

oof

looks like a dragonfly

Engineering, REAL - 2018

resulting indeed

The interesting resulting results were interesting

Thats what resulted in the result

fallout 4

My planet needs me!

RedJive213 haha

It looks so unnatural it’s crazy

*Harry Potter theme song intensifies*

@just dont your joke isn't funny

Hydra griefers when you do a sell mission

lmao

Lol

God damn nazis are still everywhere

Will send Brad Pitt ASAP.

They were thinking science fiction

JUMPJET

quensoueu1 ahhcyes

exactly what i was thinking

MEMORIES

quensoueu1 I have plenty in the sea.

No this is Patrick

TheLPRnetwork You sir are a *Genius*

Invisible wires would be incredibly valuable :)

WOAH! They have been tricking us! How dear they!

You sound like a terraplanist

Not the case at all- the technology transfer happened, but how much of the _Yak-41_ specifially was used is arguably no more than studies of its flight envelope The _F-35B_ uses a vertical thrust fan getting power from the engine, not two separate turbojets. Layout of the cold and hot thrusters are radically different. The three-section nozzle is very similar, but both get their origin from a Convair patent from the sixties.

Crybaby :D :D

@@subhasrialaya9230 😂

Matthys Fourie recognised it imediatelly

That's exactly what I thought. It probably inspired it.

Well, the helicopter bombs were heavily based off of it, but not copies. The real version had the ramjet propellor in the front, while the fictional one had it in the rear.

I paused the video and watched that scene of the movie.

AFAIK *both* the helicopter-planes *and* the flying wing from CAPT. AMERICA were inspired by German WWII proposed aircraft designs....

Agreed~

nah..... shit airframe. killed so many people, wasted billions and is less effective than helicopters that were available at the time it was first planned.

Ashley Thomas Totally false, The Osprey did have a lot of early accidents but now it's currently one of the safest airframes in US service, it also has a larger range than helicopters while carrying more and being faster

The Osprey is almost as fast as the Fairey Rotodyne but not as good.

TheReal Lifehacks How many crashes and casualties has the Osprey suffered in the last 5years? Name any other Airframe in miliatry service that has caused more deaths in the same timeframe. Your not even convincing yourself. It's a public issue that is regularly debated in MSM. There is no other progam in the US Armed Services that is a greater safety risk. (Unless you consider the actual Navy Officer class itself that has caused the 3+ major Naval collisions)

Science non-fiction

WHAT??

Exactly my thoughts

Sci

he probably knows that but that video title will give him more clicks

If only real-world VSTOL-capable fighters could fly as graciously as that thing...

Bob McCoy Hail Hydra!

@@rjfaber1991 you know that *"that thing"* is the less agile fighter in gta5?

Boi 😂😂😂I was also thinking that

@@ame0savr0s I stil love it more than lazer.

Jake Wallace my PC isn't good enough 😥

Hello fellow DCS simmer!

Gta: san andreas. Type jumpjet and youre on. Just kidding. Dont get mad.

or get fsx and install the UKMIL Harrier mod

Honestly, I still have my doubts when it comes to the flight model. It feels too easy considering the Harrier is known as one of the most difficult planes to fly. I'm pretty sure the oscillations when in ground effect aren't modelled for example.

It’s my favorite jet in gta also❤️

Mygamerindahood 1 me to lol

It sucks pp the starling is way better

@@eugenedingle6024 its no fun landing that thing and it's not as stable in flight

Nah b-11 or pyro

DEE-KAY Hubschrauber!

No, for the love of god leave this poor man alone. Helicopters are disgusting when it comes down to the aerodynamic/engineering level don't make this guy have to produce a whole 10 minutes explaining to you laymans helicopter physics.

stillnotdre he already responded to someone's comment saying he was writing script for a helicopter episode

Smarter Every Day has a Helicopter series that is really incredible, and definitely worth watching.

stillnotdre How dare you say Helicopters are disgusting!??

⚰️?

In theory, it will #belkadidnothingwrong

yup

Well no because COFFIN is a step further, COFFIN is straight up controlling the aircraft as if it was your body i recall

@@Saipan2297 basically the cockpit is entirely enclosed inside the fuselage and the pilot sees trough an array of cameras

Monster Pumpkin Obligatory Quality > Quantity comment.

Deus Ex Machina perfect

Deus Ex Machina what ?

it's not

F-35 is effectively a flying military control room. It can monitor the 'battlefield' from afar, even firing missiles if necessary from afar, rather than engage in dog fight like combat that is better suited to more agile aircraft. Don't underestimate the power of a flying ARMED combat computer in today's world.

volcano hi Yeah sure, because a drone has characteristics of any fighter.

Matt Majcan it’s the most advanced fighter in the history of warfare. How is it not good?

volcano hi none of this is true whatsoever.

I want an update on your progression through aviation school :D

@@helium269c2 I graduated with my avionics degree back in January, I re-enrolled and I'm going for my A&P. I'm taking an after school helicopter course too. I graduate completely in January 2024

I mean... I can’t disagree

well its the hydra

Writing the script as we speak

Real Engineering awesome

good luck

Please include info on dual rotor systems! I'm in love with the Chinook!

@@RealEngineering did you make it?

Benito Llan Matos did you really just

Striker Yeah he did

Nooter You did it too 😂

Lmao

Things are being harried by the wind. Stop now

Believe it or not, but where i Iive the helicopter That the avenger is based on (the osprey) flies over my area alot

Next they’re working on the oppressor mkII, be ready.

@@fadgegoatinc918 Check out that new drone bike in Dubais police forces. Greifers for days bois...😞

@@fadgegoatinc918 noooooooo

Fadgegoat inc opressor mk2 idea came from a flying bike concept from bmw

This is for F-35A Block 3F since December 2017 www.luke.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1386133/lukes-newest-amu-supports-f-35-program/ "The unit is the first Luke F-35 AMU to receive a 3F, or full-up, combat aircraft capable of pulling 9G’s in the air."

145 kills against taliban or a professional military? The Alshabab and Houthis could zap it out of the sky with emw weapons. I'd like to see the f35 against the Russian S400 systems.

The Crab 145 air to air kills against F-15C's and F-16's operating within their own integrated A2AD environment whilst also emplpying advanced ECM. The F-35's were also pitted against top teir SAM threats such as the Patriot site and even the USAF owned S-300 without being detected or shot down by either. I dont know what your opinion is on the aircraft but the fact is there is no other aircraft currently in service that can match it

Reilly Brangan you would expect such an impressive score if you set the exam, sat it and marked it for yourself, wouldn't you? In any case you have to justify the price tag for the kit. Otherwise who would buy it?

The Crab The F35 aircraft themselves aren't that expensive, and the program cost is only 1.508 trillion through 2070, which in terms of government money is pocket change, and the Red Flag exercise isn't rigged because what's the point of that? It shows the flaws and benefits of every aircraft involved and other air forces participate in red flag, ranging from France and Israel to Pakistan

That’s an F/A-18 the laser is a F-16. He even said it was an F/A-18.

Jpg Farmer the joke just flew over your head bud

Is he making fun of GTA players?

I honestly cannot see a joke that can be applied.

@@Jpizzle_x Don't worry there never was a joke

Yeah, I hate it when people defend their freedom

the only problem is when the lack of a human factor leads to the machine uprising

Removing the human factor from weaponry isn't happening anytime soon. The levels of automation are increasing really fast though. Basically a F-35 will eventually fly with a drone escort improving its performance.

Kid In Africa sure

4TheWinQuinn wasn't that the whole video?

Everyone knows the harrier is British calm down looool

volcano hi ??

volcano hi Just want you to know that what you have said is complete rubbish. The UK didn’t abandon the Harrier project. The Harrier has been in continuous UK military service from ‘69 to 2011. The Uk didn’t scrap the project in ‘75, perhaps you missed the sea Harrier deployment in the Falklands war in 1982 (where the Harrier had a kill to death ratio of 21:0)? It’s just astounding to me that someone would imply the main Harrier innovation came from the USA.

The Yak-41 is closer to the F-35 design, but it seems awfully similar to the Convair Model 200 concept. The F-35 is only similar in appearance and VTOL thrust placement though, since it uses a driveshaft to spin a lift fan while the Yak all used two jet engines to achieve the same frontal lift.

@@ivanlagrossemoule One engine - this was to become the Yak-43, which was a development of the Yak-141. It was built only in the layout. And since the creators of the Yak and F-35 collaborated, they got access to the drawings.

@@user-xf7tm9nq3i the F-35 design has absolutely nothing to do with failed soviet prototypes. The only thing americans got out of the Yak-141 was the flight test data. Lockheed was funding the Yakolev project, which in turn was flying the prototype and giving data to Lockheed. By the time they did that, the X-35 was already being built.

@@lucastekkan There is some information on the Yak-43 on the Internet. Yes, of course, I believe that the Americans did the same thing themselves - a coincidence. And the Yak-141 was not unsuccessful, it was a complete project, and the best in the world at that time. Check the information before you speak. He did not go into the series, because at that moment the USSR collapsed, and the entire Russian aircraft industry received huge difficulties.

Runs out of what?

Fuck off mate no one likes brits

@@DiegoMartinez-jz7jc where r u from?

@@DiegoMartinez-jz7jc considering you wouldn't even have electricity without us lol

ghost 1828 huh?

@@DiegoMartinez-jz7jc answer me

👍👍

Pp Km

The Argentine pilots did not think so.

Crouching harrier hidden dragon

@@barrierodliffe4155 the argentine pilots are "the best pilots of war" evading the radar and sinking 8 or 9 ships, total ships demaged 21...

@@fliegerfaust4261 Since you are telling lies, 6 ships sunk and 18 damaged, many of the damaged were not seriously damaged. In air combat 3 Skyhawk, 9 Dagger and 1 Mirage, another Mirage damaged but later shot down by the Argentine army, that was by Sea Harrier pilots who sustained no losses in air combat.

@@barrierodliffe4155 there were 2 harriers shot down by missiles...somehow...7 damaged by cannons...1 or 2 shot down and the classic harrier shot down by the AA battery with only 7 shots,we know about some war secrets that we are investigating...32 people...we do not like that the world powers lie so as not to ruin their reputation...

Bachmanity

chickenbreath4 yes yes yes yes

Just search Russian Helicopter, or sign up to fight in Syria. You’ll soon see one (for a moment or two!).

I just think it's a cool plane. I'm not about war or American politics.

Real Engineering true

over 200 A B & C variant jets flying with an approaching 150,000 hour flying time miles tone without crash ... the last generational leap in fighter tech, the F-16 saw over 500 jets lost in just the US Air Force from Mishaps & accidents .. and far too many pilots killed. Congress, Senate & the pentagon, spent well over $100 BILLION in 'over budget' funding to try and fix it (the F-35A is just $4 Billion over budget) and many pilots just quit the USAF on learning they'd have to fly the "electric lawn dart". The F-35 JSF programme suffered from mismanagement early on, but was fixed and made a responsible programme under the helm of Gen. Bogdan... who was solely responsible in the ridiculous 2nd engine programme being cancelled for the F-35 JSF... he knew and was familiar with the boondoggle of the F-16's 2nd engine, and knew that the JPO and the tax payer could not afford to be so reckless or wasteful with money, time & resources. To date, the entire JSF (A, B & C) programme has 1 lost air frame due to gross human error, a fire consumed 3/4 of a jet after the ground crew chief twice signed off on having done the engine break-in period & tests, while NOT HAVING DONE SO ... in response, the JPO designated that P&W be responsible for all US inventory jet's engine break-ins, and a fix be made to prevent a fire if an engine be installed and run at full power without the break-in period again. They're operating successfully overseas, despite a spare parts shortage (common in aviation programmes, the JSF is not unique there), and the technology is proven itself from tranche 2B to 3F in green flag, red flag, and the 'knight & entry exercises domestically. having flown the B & A models since 2013 over the standard networked setup of Three PAC-3 air defense batteries without detection or simulated loss, INCLUDING the 2015 & 2016 PAC-3 test, utilizing the F-35B flight attached to RedFlag, with the PAC-3 operators directing the F-35B's (pair of 2 & singular) to fly how/when/where overhead. During these exercises, the legacy F/A-18C/E, AV-8B, F-16CD, & A-10 suffer 2/3rds losses to simulated air defences & 98% detection rates. In no survey group of the 'blue' ground forces, could they tell the difference between F-35B/A or Legacy Close-Air support fire missions. in any year. With the F-35A & B having flown 95.5% success rates in 'Flag exercises so far. -------------- Should the JSF have occurred? dunno ... without a STOVL jet, the trillions of dollars in the USMC gator carrier fleet would have needed an entire war fighting doctorine rethink & change ... and they would have NEVER have gotten an independently developed jet. ... the fiscal costs of the F-35 ABC JSF programme & JPO are TRILLIONS less than the cost to change the force structure of the US Navy.... and the delay in the final operating service guise is FIVE DECADES FASTER than building new ships. ... so with everything, there's PRO's and CON's ... especially when creating a new generation & a never done before technology.... which, last time, resulted in the F-16 ... over 500 jets lost, too many pilots killed and $100 billion more than the F-35A in overbudget funding

Aleksander Lucy, Where are you sourcing your information about pilots quitting the service rather than fly the F-16? I'm curious because at the end of flight school when airframe assignments are first made all of the flight school candidates are committed to serve for 10 years as payback of their initial and advanced undergraduate pilot training. Is there a record of mass exodus at the end of the 10 year commitment that exit interviews attributed to the F-16 incident rate?

Michael Onines that's wasn't me who posted that block

i think he means sci fi as in from the movies, i think

I don’t think “Real Life Science” would be a very interesting title. Should you put shame on him for making an interesting title?

@@somethingidk5007 there's a difference between making an interesting title and making an incorrect and misleading title

k k they forgot to switch VTOL mode

N BOR without AWACS support, an F35 has to turn on its own radar sensors, which is like turning on a big beacon for anything with a passive radar system. The trillions of dollars of stealth make it a bit of a pig in the sky compared to some gen 4 fighters too, French Rafales beat F35 (or F22 I can’t remember) at Red Flag training exercise quite a few times a think. The US have stopped inviting them now...

Stealth isn't invisibility. It's more like camouflage.

I'd say they are equivalent

Sebastião Mendonça P e r h a p s

This was 2 years ago but I’m not sure if such a thing existed then

@@Ender-jl8dd Falcon 9s have been landing from suborbital trajectories since 2016

Sebastião Mendonça I meant the space x rocket booster