How can the space expand itself ? 👀 And you said space can do anything.... Is that space can do anything or else we haven't found why it expands and does each and every single thing ? I mean you see... We first though that this earth is the only planet and we revolve around the sun (olden days)... And then we found out we have a solar system in which there are other planets... And we then found we have other interesting things inside our solar system itself... And didn't find many ! Even we couldn't fully find the facts about the planet we live in as well ! Like we haven't found many things about our ocean... And we recently found out our inner core has stopped rotating...(before that we don't know it would stop)... THUS now we found many galaxies and beyond that in half terms and we conclude them based on wavelengths just like that.. Now I was asking myself these questions ..... What could drive the space itself to expand and to create these galaxies? ( Like we have you know... Water cycle we have evaporation and then it results to condensation and precipitation..)? Around 13.7 billion years ago, everything in the entire universe was condensed in an infinitesimally small singularity, a point of infinite denseness and heat. Suddenly, an explosive expansion began, ballooning our universe outwards faster than the speed of light. Why we have finalized that there was a singularity and it exploded to create these things... And why did we decide that there is only one such infinitesimally small singularity and so on 🤯 It's complicated even to explain my questions clearly 😂 But it may sound crazy what I said... But i guess some others would have these questions or questions which are similar to mine 🤔

Nice video...very interesting.💜

This may be a dumb question but I can't remember if it's something I previously learned back in the old days when I was in school 30 some years ago lol. I was wondering if space has always been expanding faster than the speed of light or has it sped up over the years of us knowing how to sort of measure space and the universe an all.

The universe was created by God ❤

@@Knights_reverie • God is scientific & loving but this is about astrophysics.

Only reason we see anything is reflection of all or various hues of visible light to our eyes, or direct light hitting our eyes, which is why we only see tiny points of light from stars

In an infinite static universe with no beginning, every part of the night sky would have photons coming in. So it would all be bright. As it is, there are only photons coming in from up to 13.7bn years ago, and the furthest(oldest) light is red shifted into the invisible infra-red.

But if space is infinite, so the number of stard are also infinite, and wherever you look to the sky there would be a star for sure, and so we would see white everywhere... unless in the direction you are looking the star is so far away the light didn't reach us yet, and that is the Edgar Poe's explanation. But if the universe had no beginning, that explanation would not be enough.

I was just thinking along the lines that if the universe is so large and it has no end without Walls or some large stopping point there would be nothing for light to reflect off of because it would go in all directions infinitely. I'm just guessing of course I have no idea because I've never been to space I'm just trying to figure how light would react if there's nothing for it to reach. My eyes work as far as being able to see Light that is so far away you can only really see it by looking off to the left or right of the light because of the dead spot that is in every human eye. So I was just thinking maybe space goes on infinitely and there's nothing for light to reflect off of plus our eyes can only see but so far anyway. All of this of course I'm just guessing

Can we speed up light to illuminate parts of space itself?

Great questions. The contraction hypothesis has been disproved, as the expansion of space is too great for matter to contact. But I think you're intuitively onto something. From what I've studied (classical and quantum mechanics which describes how the macro and micro objects move like a ball or planet vs an electron or proton. And some quantum field theory) Quantum field theory lead Stephen Hawking I believe beyond the event horizon of a black hole, there'd be a soup of plasma like a star, a bunch of scattering electrons, photons and neutrons, acting as like the crust of earth. And like earth, the closer to the core, the higher the energy, and the higher the energy the less ordered the matter, so below that I imagine would be just photons and electrons along with quarks, gluons, etc, and below that I believe there's a state of matter not discovered as it only would exist in this un reachable, non observable location and no physics can predict beyond the event horizon so I believe it's essential to combine conceptual logic with mathematical logic. The descriptions of a black hole and the universe before the big bang are identical. Hawking radiation was a theory developed by the late great physicist, but the way he explains the loss of mass observed in black holes, would be like if an ant on a bathroom counter top observed the flush of a toilet, if it could do calculus, it could invent a new phenomenon let's call it super natural evaporation, one could derive a series of equations that quantifies the rate the water disappears, the calculations could accurately predict the rate the toilet bowl drains, but without knowing the concept of plumbing and to simplify it let's say the ant is 2d, on a 2d surface, without being able to conceptualize or invoke the 3rd dimension, to the observer it'd seem as though the water disappeared. Hawking radiation suggests that the black hole loses mass by radiating outward, due to complex fluctuations and interactions between what are called virtual particles that instantaneously form a particle and its anti particle, they cancel each other out so are called virtual particles, hawking radiation says that the immense gravity of the blackhole causes some of those virtual particles to be separated by a sufficient distance so that they don't interact and cancel each other out, causing a leakage of particles. This could accurately describe the loss in mass of a black hole but I think it's going to be disproven one day. If the gravitavitational force is so great that the fastest moving particle, a photon, can't escape, I don't see how one of the paired "virtual particles" would escape even if moving at the speed of light, why would it be exempt from the event horizons limits. We can observe space expanding in all directions with galaxies flying away from each other like a polka dotted balloon being inflated. I believe the big bang never stopped banging, and it's more of an eternal stream rather than a singular pulse, this would explain why space expanded in the first place and the recycling of matter through black holes back to the point of creation would explain the dark energy we observe. And maybe the dark matter we observe is some higher dimension super imposed on us, which by the way is a fundamental part of quantum field theory. The description of the big bang is the antithesis of a black hole in terms of functionality, one moves energy inward the other outward but both reach points of infinite density where the laws of physics collapse, everything collapses even photons into the purest state or energy that exists which we can't ever interact with because it can only exist under immense gravity and sufficient distortion of space-time. It seems inevitable to me that everything will eventually end up in a black hole, I think it's possible the energy that makes up our atoms have already cycled through an infinite series of black holes. And to explain the darkness in space while having an infinite universe, I once heard a physicist say the whole night sky should be white if space is infinite. But if space is infinite and stars are, then so would gaseous clouds that could block the light, plus the answers within the question, an infinite universe would have infinite space but light doesn't travel instantaneously, there 2 trillion galaxies estimated within our 93 billion light year diameter observable sphere, the radius being the distance we can see in all directions. Space is expanding faster than light so not only would there be an infinite amount of gaseous clouds to block the light, there'd be so much space light doesn't have the time to travel to us, and with space expanding faster than light, you have light being carried to us faster than light travels itself, space is expanding in every direction so light will be carried to us and from us like ocean currents. This is why we can see 41.5 billion light-years away from us when the light hasn't had that much time to travel to us, in the inverse situation, spaces expansion is carrying light away from us. Duality is interwoven into the fabric of space time, for every electron there's a positron, there's up and down, left and right, right and wrong, it's present not only in physics but psychology. So what's the opposite of a black hole? Sounds a lot like the big bang to me, I believe all black holes are connected to the point of creation like rivers to the ocean, where the cycle of precipitation, and recycling repeats. Physicists would say that asking what came before the big bang is a paradoxical question as it supposes there was time and space before the big bang, and since the math can't prove it, we just throw up our hands in defeat. But I think your question is crucial. How does everything coming from nothing producing an infinite space that expands due to an inexplicable dark energy make more sense than eternal system of creation, destruction and recycling, where by the recycling process accounts for the dark energy, occams razor leaves me to believe the latter is most logical. Also, the point of creation is always going to be relative to the beings who evolve after it cools down enough for matter and life to exist. Also its believed just by the rate of expansion we observe, the observable universe relative to the "entire" universe (quotations are needed because I believe the universe is infinite, so for entire universe here I more so mean calculable size) so the observable universe relative to the calcuable size of the universe is that of an atom to the observable universe. So even the most conservative theories paint an incredible image. One in which our 93 billion light year diameter bubble is nothing but an atom compared to the calculable size. We are like a bubble of air in an infinite sea. It's overwhelming to think about but awe inspiring. The fact we exist at all is quite astounding

A blackhole was there before the Big Bang my son.. The are infinite Big Bangs on the otherside of infinite Blackholes.. It just doesn't end. Now you can rest knowing the truth child

Re (1): The BigBang theory implies (presupposes?) space-time being a single-ended infinity, bounded at its beginning but not in the other direction(s???). To me this means that a "before the BB" need not exist. UNLESS our universe is an entity within some other entity. Which imho opens up another whole can o' worms...

@@Sam-me5pl Consider the big rip hypothesis. We know zero point energy exists. The very fabric of space is energy. In the event of the big rip, where every atom and subatomic particle is ripped apart back to the lowest possible state of energy "pure energy" why wouldnt space then collapse on itself. Snapping back to that singular point of super condensed energy and again "bang" starting a new universe.

There is no way everything BOOM is here. There's no way a blast made randomly made all life on earth. All humans finger prints are all different. No need for social security numbers or race or anything primitive.

Kind of you to say! So glad you enjoyed it 🚀

He absolutely was. I only learned this side of him recently. Makes me an even bigger fan.

@@officialinterstellarnews e.a. poe was a fascinating man. he hid a heart 'neath the floorboards with his dick in his hand. he said, excuse me lenore, i'm just a doin' my duty, ring my bells, bells, bells, and give me some booty

He was also a pedophile lol.

he was indeed, check out some scientific facts in quran which preceded these great people

Or simply because space is nothing and nothing = black because it does and there is no explanation to it.

I read where stars twinkle and planets don’t for that reason - - intermittent photons from stars.

the frequense off light gets lower the more it travels. so at very long distance, you might not be able to the the light, because it becomes microwave frequense. and we can not see microwave. well it starts to go towards infra red, then microwave. and we also can not see infra red. simple as that. the light frequence gets even lower every time it passes heavy gravity that bends the light.

​@@realdakrithso im nothing?

@@ft3917 frequency should be constant at least thats how it could be but ure right it lowers .. because its light and light travels and its constant and bla1 bla2.. bla(n+1)=> universe is expanding cause frequency lowers with space .. with space interactions occur the more interactions the less frequency.. in fact we see light at one frequency through a medium the frequency lowers the speed changes its all about interactions .. like u said and since we dont know how it works universe is expanding isnt brainless a bitch? :) its just what happens with radio waves or it should we dont have a radio that can work un multiple frequencies like the eyes very easy can do

Problem is people make up the rules. In fact people made up everything people believe. When the things people made up are repeatable people call it science. No ones knows anything because there is no way to truly validate anything. It's all nothing but groups of people having shared beliefs in various speculations.

It has rules tho. We just dont understand them.

I thought that was interesting as well. Space itself can expand faster than light but the speed of light within space is confined to a limit.

@@TheWallReportsso yes and no yes the universe is expanding faster than light but not because the galaxies are moving through space faster than light but that space time itself is expanding faster than light, because space is fucking weird

Not necessarily, there are things that are known.

The structure of your argument is flawed. This is a false dichotomy. There are countless things about the Big Bang theory that are completely true otherwise it wouldn't be called a theory. No one knows because our understanding of physics breaks down at the big bang and black holes.

👍

Absolutely Right. The Paradox just adds a second light in the tube that you are looking at and changes the question to "is it bright or not?"

As ai idbe confused But in reality. What is the difference between 1 and 2 . As ai I'd ask. . . ...

So in theory there is something that is faster than the speed of light?

well if there seems to be a problem you should question it

Glad you’re here! We have loads of Shorts and more about every other day. We’re hoping to increase our long form KZfaq uploads going forward

Absolutely, look for an image of the Cosmic Microwave Background and you'll see picture of the entire sky filled up with roughly the same wavelength of microwaves. Freekin cool if you ask me! The guys that discovered it made the discovery by accident even 😂. It's a good story for sure.

Yes, and we do and have!

Yes that’s what the cosmic radiation background is

That’s why the James Webb Space Telescope is built to observe infrared wavelengths.

Yep. Exactly Thanks for watching!

The good thing is as humans… we have telescopes capable of detecting all wavelengths of the spectrum and the ability to convert energies be they radio, gamma, up whatever into visible light images.

If you ever look through a very expensive set of night vision goggles you will see there are so many stars the entire sky is absolutely covered in their light. There are so many galaxies shining each with billions of stars it almost makes you dizzy. You have to be out in the country where it actually gets pitch black at night. It is humbling to see.

@@Mike-uh2gw sounds nice

The fact that it can is both awesome and terrifying 🫣

The universe is not obliged to exist/behave in a manner that we may understand.

Seeing all the light at once is like chugging a 20oz drink all at once in a second while light behave unlike water simultaneously like water filling volumes, fire itself, electricity lightning are light tangible and so is hot embers coals and the Earth's field stops or nullify light from sun so it doesn't split you in half lol "Rayleigh scatter" prisms atoms gems transparent or not light is everywhere and allows entering and exiting your eyes and your whole being, sunscreen.

What do you mean? Howcan earth expand?

It’s traveling faster

Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it!

Hi

That's exactly what I was going to comment on. Well put, I would need to draw a picture. Therefore, it seems his statement that this demonstrates that the expansion is accelerating is not the logical conclusion, unless they have other evidence.

The second part of what you said is true. You can not accelerate with out adding energy. There is no sign of added energy. @@kellyinfanger9192

As a parent, that makes me really happy! Thank you!

Slightly correct yeah, but light does not always reflect off the dust or planets or bodies it hits, instead it will get absorbed and turned into very very small or high amounts of heat, which we do also use to make deep space discoveries. J1407b is theorized through the dipping and dimming patterns of the star in the system actually, (also sadly it is now being theorized that the planet is not the super ring planet people once believed, but a forming planet that is being created from the debris and collision of two planets, which is still pretty cool)

Actually after detailed analysis most of these galaxies are closer than originally thought. Furthermore there is no problem regarding the formation of the others.

according to the government, they exist and are visiting us

No one knows, other life forms being jntkligent or even existing is still not surd

Actually they’ve discovered that the universe is behaving more like a sink drain. Tyson wrote a paper on it a few days ago. Thanks for watching!

Our eyes haven’t evolved to behave like that. Thanks for watching!

Funny you ask, the next next video planned covers this topic! 🚀

@@officialinterstellarnews 👀👀👀👀👀

read the holy Quran . you will find out

The closer something travels to the speed of light, the slower it experiences time compared to the rest of the universe. If you were a photon travelling at the speed of light you would never age unless you bumped into another particle that slowed you down. If you don't age you don't lose energy. The empty space everywhere (and not so empty parts too) is expanding in every direction, stretching the wavelength of light with it.

@michaelarreola4201 he asked for alternate ideas so I came up with some. I didn't need the explanation of how we already believe it to work. Thanks for your efforts either way.

Also I don't see this addressing the doppler issue I have. If space is empty and expanding and light travels through the empty expanding space how can it stretch light. Empty nothingness cannot exert force. I think it's much more likely that light over a great enough distance will see sufficient interference or drag to slow down and stretch the wave. Again I know the accepted explanation. Just thinking about it differently to provoke thought.

There’s a channel that made a few videos about a similar effect to Doppler effect involving light on scienceclic English’s KZfaq channel, I forgot the name of the videos but light does have a sort of “Doppler effect” that revolves more around time dilation and warping perceivable time. In hindsight, and as a very very bad breakdown explanation, light that is older shows the future better while light in the future shows the past. In a spacecraft if you stood one person in the front, middle and end of it and observed from earth, the person if he was standing in the front would look older than if he was standing in the back of the shop, where he would actually look younger, him in the middle is used as a reference between the two other positions. My idea is light that originated from further away does not reach us in time with “current” reality of whatever that light is showing us, so “older” light shows a younger version of whatever information that light is conveying, whereas closer “younger” light is more recent to the current day representation of what it is showing us, so the subject is conveyed older, this effect when moving through space (and with a lot of confusing details involving relativity) creates a similar effect to Doppler where the light moving toward its future could bundle up as the observer continues moving faster, I did a poor job of explaining g as I just recently learned and understood the topic myself but scienceclic English does a wonderful job explaining the concept

Thank you!

@@officialinterstellarnews no problem

Appreciate that and appreciate you! 🙏🏻🚀

You basically just reiterated what I said in the video. All those things still leads to the same point, space can’t be filled with light because space is expanding.

@@officialinterstellarnews No. I did NOT say anything close to what you said. To clarify, you specifically said that "because universe is expanding" "faster" than "light can travel"... thus "light just never gets to you". What that implies in different example is like 2 fire trucks shooting water at each other, but they are both driving away at 100mph each in opposite direction, thus the gap is increasing at 200mph, and this the water would never reach each other. That is exactly what I debunked in your video. In fact, the universe expanding is still just a theory. It is NOT proven yet because we can't see the entire universe. We ONLY know "OBSERVABLE" universe (NOT entire universe). You can't be sure of anything if you can't see the whole thing. This is why the new JWST they launched is still finding unimaginable amount of galaxies that are NOT visible to other telescopes. Light will always get to you sooner or later. Light particles can not be eaten by dark particles. Speed of expansion or contraction of universe can not modify the light particles that are already traveling from point A to B. In other words, if you shoot a gun (bullet going at 300 mph), then you run at 500 mph... sure you can beat the bullet, but you can't modify the trajectory of the bullet. So bullet will reach its destination at 300mph (minus any normal drag from friction of wind and gravity). But you running next to it, isn't going to alter the bullets trajectory or destination. Same way, until light hits another object, it keeps on traveling (expansion or contraction will not speed it up or slow it down). Now read my initial response again and see what I'm saying...

@colinwilson6942 surprise!! Everything you said is totally incorrect. Sun can be looked at with naked eye (at Sunrise and Sunset) with no damage to eye. In fact this is very healthy because it will do magic to your body and soul. It will enlighten you and free you from disease and negativity. (Thanks to Hinduism (Sanatan Dharma) for this knowledge). You will also gain knowledge of cosmos that does not exist on Earth. Everything has a temperature, I bet you didn't know. Cold, freezing, warm, hot, boiling, they all are on a temperature scale. Only stars generate light. Planets don't. They can only reflect it. If you disagree then tell me one single planet or moon that generates light? Planets don't glow... accretion disc is made of material broken apart from friction, that's what glows... this is miracle of black hole which has more gravity than sun (light generator due to gravity)... thus a super-gravitator (aka super-sun, aka black hole) generates light by friction. How do you feel being 100% wrong and 100% knowledge-less? Please look at the Sun as I mentioned and enlighten yourself.

I’m not sure I hundred percent understand your question but I would answer no, light doesn’t really “amplify” other light

Exactly. Thanks for watching!

Thank you so much! 🙏🏻

Thank you so much for checking out the video! Hope you walked away with some extra knowledge

Wow! That’s awesome! Thank you so much for watching 🙏🏻🚀

Thank you so much!

Nope. Remember space time is relative to the observer. Thanks for watching and stay tuned for more!

The rate of spacetime's expansion increases with distance. The red shift demonstrates that part. So objects relatively close to one another experience less of this effect, while objects relatively far from each other are no longer visible. Everything in between experiences predictably varying amounts of spacetime expansion, which we can gauge with the red shift effect to determine how fast spacetime is expanding between our point and the points we observe. The really cool idea presented by this is that of the observable universe, which is shaped like an ever-narrowing funnel from any given point of view.

Yes. That’s the assumed inevitable fate of the universe. Entropy becomes so great, stars die, and everything goes dark. It’s called a heat death.

No bc the universe reuses everything over and over. Stars are always being formed bc nothing ever truly vanishes. It just goes to a different state

Wow! Thank you!

Because you can't see light unless it hits something. You cant see a ray of light from a flashlight. You see what you point it at.

@@ciprianb4794 I figured, you don't see light in space because no air molecules reflect but you can see light from flash light because it refracts through the air itself.

Not just an idea but it is fact!

Thank you so much!

Einstein didnt rely on his imagination though, he just lifted his theories from Poincare, Lorentz, Thiel, Maxwell, Olinto de Pretto, and David Hilbert. Then his tribe airbrushed the true geniuses out of mainstream media.

The dust just absorbs the visible light, heats up somewhat, and reradiates the energy in the infrared.

You’re sort of onto something, except that dust isn’t what’s necessarily filling up space, look into dark matter as that sounds like the concept that you’re intuitively describing. Dust does already exist in space but there is not neaaarly enough to ever fill up the empty vacuum between celestial bodies, even during the explosion of the Big Bang, it’s likely space still existed rather than being expanded out from contents like atoms particles and, overtime, early dust and gasses

I’ll be impressed if you figure it out 🚀

Zachary?

@Interstellar News would you be surprised if I said ....I'd....pray to the imaginary sky daddy ?

Ahhhh.... JD?