"B-1, dont you fucking do it..."

*_country roads playing quietly in the distance_*

B-1er Harris, do it again.

funni when?

>:)

Most understanding superior

Well yeah man, his career is at risk

@@Nothing-1w3 most Based MEU(SOC) commander.

I like that the game just straight up blames YOU. In another game, it would've said something more vague like "All objectives failed, retreat!" or "Friendly units destroyed!". But no, this game just goes "You fucking idiot, what the fuck are you doing? You suck ass." Honestly, we need more games that are actually harsh on the player again.

How dare you stand in the way of his shiny new medal

Canadian Marines?

@@DebilNo4Mk1 could be. Though they would instead offer to surrender. Booby trap everything on that one guy killing him without a sound while adding 30 new points to the geneva convention

@@leifbirgerolsen9167 As a Canadian, your not lying we only got nice after Korea 😂😂 WW1-WW2 Canadian units were savages

@@CanadianFitted Google "Somalia affair"

​@@CanadianFittednever got nice, just polite.

just like the old cod mw trilogy too!

especially the music

Dude if it looks good I'll buy it. The rts market is so unsaturated it hurts :(

There definitely will be. With the rate game development tools are developing, it's becoming easier and easier for some pretty nice looking games to be made by smaller studios. With how many games are coming out, genres with a fairly small but dedicated fanbase like the RTS genre are a perfect target for studios looking to find players without too much in the way of marketing. I'm personally hoping for more action-RTS' that come closer to the likes of Company of Heroes. The original was bloody amazing, especially the campaign, but I'm not as much of a fan of COH2 or 3. I'd buy anything that plays similarly.

Same Pumped for this game

@@T0asty- It's all fucking cold war games. The industry is progressing like a warthunder tech tree we went from ww2 to cold war to modern war.

..bro, its not only good, its amazing. You've got no idea how long av been waiting on this game

My exact first thoughts too.

That is so what I was hoping to hear, World in Conflict was absolutely sick and it's a shame it has gone without a spiritual successor for so long

There is fire support as in planes and artillery but i do believe they should add like offmap artillery and air assets, so you can have like a MOAB, or A shitload of B-52s striking a target

World in Conflict but with the unit diversity of Wargame, and the ability to customize units like artillery and fixed-wing aircraft is essentially customizable fire support. Even includes a nuke.

God I love world in conflict so much and this looks really good I’m going to have to check this out

especially if it's a bit more realistic instead of arcade-y. Don't get me wrong, arcade-y RTS games could very well be fun but there's something about the feeling of carefully executing a plan and taking a city / destroying a base / having a 1-on-1 armored battle that just reminds me of Arma 3, like Rimmy said. Love it

Another one I wish got a bit more love was Cepheus Protocol. According to someone, they've been kind of downhill for the past 6 months or so, without much profits, or literally none at all. I kind of feel bad now when playing it, because even though it has quite a few bugs, it feels a bit hopeless, because those bugs might never be fixed.

would ya like a ZSU 23 with iglas on your MTLB? YES

An amazing rts that is paradox or total war is also impossible

**Laughs in giantgrantgames**

Those aren’t RTS games they are 4Xs

@Dick Izzinya the ships go sailing on land, the dlc factions are the strongest, the pathfinding is non existent, and diplomacy is horrendously broken. Finally, there's $200 in dlc containing features that used to be in their games. Yup, I can imagine it.

​@@ElGreco15 nah, all the factions are there from the start, it's just that most only become a good option to play once DLC drops, you know, instead of just being complete suffering

Yea same, I was salty when Rimmy casually got away with shit that would end in instantly being swatted out of the sky for me

"Realistic" is a bit of a stretch, especially with their AI which seems kind of simple when compared to Steel Division and Warno AI.

@@MistikCo that’s why it’s in quotes and also specifically talking about the damage model

The biggest thing I am worried about is micro management. I Like WARNOs new system where you can make large groups have vague orders like to hold or seize positions. If this game can allow delegating than I agree this game could definitely beat wargame. However, if we have to micro between air forces, aa, tanks, infantry, and so on, then its just another clone. Imo, I feel a lot of rts games like this fail without that ability to delegate because then as a player you have to quickly switch between general and platoon level decisions which gets old quick.

I'm sorry, but Warno's still a better game than this, and better looking.

This mission in particular is pretty difficult. though theres a little exploit where if you don't take the fort you can just clear the entire map of enemies.

Abit but this looks modern post cold war era

even the way camera pointing your objective

How bad are the graphics in potato

@@cristobalalvarez5491 Only noticeable if you're constantly zooming into units or are used to always playing stuff on 4K, ultra settings.

Warno looks dead in the water compared to this.

@@blitzkrieg8776 I mean Broken Arrow isn't offically out yet, so Warno still has some time to live. And also I find the AI in Warno to be much better.

​@@blitzkrieg8776lmao not a chance. Warno is way better than this trash. It's way to arcadey for me

​@@Reaver3214 You personal taste doesn't matter, especially about a game in Alfa!!!

@@Propaganda9112 cope

Feels exactly like WiC with Modern Warfare mod on, absolute nostalgia

It’s just to make the us and the Russian troops more different

probably someone will eventually mod it in

No it's not. And never will be)

It's a full scale war and they haven't wiped each other off with nuclear weapons. That's absurd.

No modern combat game can ever be called realistic again, because if it was truly realistic nobody who wanted to win would ever play russia.

@@brilobox2 or the US for that matter, bcz Afghanistan and stuff. Factions like Australia, China, Brazil - for the win!

@@vitorossi7839 Another simple minded fuck that doesnt understand the difference between military and political defeats. The last two years in Afghanistan the Taliban were too scared to come out of their caves that there hadn’t been a single US casualty for those two years. Yeah they sure showed the US lmao. US pulled out because the Afghan National Guard were more interested in shooting up heroine than fighting for their country and we werent going to carry them anymore. Idk what shit country you’re from, but if you actually believe any country on Earth including China wouldnt get the absolute shit destroyed out of them trying to fight the US military rn then you’re truly an ignorant peasant.

@@jaydenshepard7928 Firstly, i love how you instantly go for personal insults. Shows your level of confidence (or, to be specific, lack thereof) in your position. The fact is - the US did was not able to achieve its goals, both military (exterminate Taliban) and political (nation building stuff). Also, the US has not fought anyone in conventional war since the Gulf war, but it was not really "only the US", since there was 35 countries in the coalition. You can coat your "we did not loose in Afghanistan" however you want for the sake of patriotism and/or sanity. Does not change the fact the US did not achieve their military goals. As per your bs regarding "if anybody tried to fight the US" - its the US who wants to fight anybody, not the other way around. IIRC China has never stated they wanted to attack anybody ever. And im not sure if the US has the capability to win a conventional offensive war against China. Not now, and surely not further into the future. Defensive - sure, due to difference in naval power. Plus any proper aggression of the US towards China, in my opinion, will lead to nuclear fallout. And you might be as arrogant and stupid as you want - the US wouldn't survive a nuclear war.

@@vitorossi7839 You’ve already demonstrated your ignorance by actually believing any major country would launch nukes, this isnt the cold war you simpleton. MAD is absolute, every country knows this. Their chances of survival in a guerrilla war after being utterly conquered are far greater than their chances of winning a nuclear war, since that chance is zero lol. There is no permanently defeating group x, or group Y in an unconventional war. No country on Earth can accomplish that because its not how that works. Not without turning the entire region into ash. No other country on Earth could have accomplished it so why even bring it up? The Taliban were hiding in caves not doing jack shit to accomplish their only goals because they literally couldnt, as even wandering outside meant getting tracked by a drone and then their little cave getting collapsed by a MOAB or bunker buster and all their dwindling amounts of friends dying. Thats not winning anything, that’s being all but defeated. If the entire Russian army went deep underground and stopped fighting their invaders and let the entire surface country be occupied without resistance did they not lose? They sure as hell arent doing enough to be a contender to winning lol. The USs goal was not to have some fantastical permanent destruction of the Taliban, it was to crush them enough that the ANA could be built up enough to contain them, but this wasnt possible because the ANA and Afghan people as a whole have no sense of nationalism whatsoever, and no desire to fight for a better life. Tell me how it was possible to change an entire culture of 100s of years within 20? Got another nation lined up that you somehow genuinely think woulda magically accomplished that kind of shift? Nah? Sit down then. We knew theyd fall immediately but we were done doing literally everything for them so they could have an actually non shit country for once in their entire history as a people. Iraq in comparison is actually doing quite well and is only growing more stable and developing economically and socially even despite how hard they were hit by ISIS…but I guess you’ll just ignore that one because US success in the middle east cant exist in the minds of you ignorant coping machines. I get it, your country is weak and irrelevant. Sucks to suck, but dont waste your breath trying to do mental gymnastics in an effort to make the ridiculous case that the most powerful nation state and empire that has ever existed in the history of man is somehow weak lol… The US finally deciding Afghanistan is a hopeless country not worth investing in and leaving is not a military defeat lmao. Hell its hardly even a defeat at all. The Taliban hid in the deepest depths they could find and essentially stopped playing, then the US stopped playing which it planned to do since 2015 but had just put off another 5 years. Then the Taliban came out after the US was gone. They didn’t even attack the US when they had the chance either because they knew theyd be torn to pieces. Nah only some ISIS remnants had the balls to do that. If you think the US couldnt win an offensive war against the completely worthless paper tiger that is the PLA then you’re yet again demonstrating your extreme ignorance. The damn Russian army had far more actual combat experience than the PLA, but not nearly enough and they demonstrated what happens when you just build a big army in size without the amount of resources the US has to pump into its military and all their training and logistics. Larger armies always end up equaling lower quality soldiers, and drastically less cohesion and organization than smaller ones. The PLA is a giant bloated mess just like everything else about that shitty country, and it has essentially ZERO combat experience of any kind whatsoever. China hasn’t fought anyone even an insurgency since the Korean war lmao. The US in comparison is filled with veterans all over its ranks with real world combat experience, and even more in its reserves. Before the war in Ukraine the US military had the most real world combat experience in its ranks than any nation on Earth, other than smaller countries in shitty regions of the world that are constantly at war. Not to mention the tech gap is absurd. The kill rates of modern weapons make human wave tactics entirely obsolete. The US also gets closer and closer to automating its military kill assets every year which makes numbers even more irrelevant. I love that you have the gall to try and poke at me like im coping or am insecure, nah lmao that would be you and all your ilk that have to cling to any idea that lets them try and ignore that the US’s power eclipses any other nation on Earth, and any direct military conflict would result in the annihilation of any other nation or group of nations on Earth. Hell the moment China actually somehow manages to hold off the US enough to hurt or threaten them even a bit the US would just need to take the post WW2 gloves off and bomb all their cities to the ground and that’d be it. Wouldnt matter if China had a population of 5 billion, theyd be snuffed out. Cant fight if you don’t even have a population lmao.

...except Warno's still the better playing and looking game. ..

Ospreys are pretty cool -when they manage to stay in the air during calm weather and friendly skies-

@@comradesoupbeans4437 they do attract fire 🔥

Got warno a few weeks ago because of this game and it's not bad at all. Now after playing warno the rose colored glasses have come off and broken arrow looks less appealing. Explosions along with smoke trails just look better in warno imo of course; multiplayer is really fun considering you have a nice selection of factions to choose from as well. Will need to see more content from BA to regain the hype for it.

@@zcoosa1648 its not really fair comparing warno with BA and talking about MP, Specially since this is an early beta IIRC, but even after playing WARNO i really trust a lot into BA

@@hornet8364 there's no point in comparing the two then if you can't count multiplayer, that's all warno has rn.