Dark Supergirl would sometimes manifest as the dominant personality for awhile after her initial story in the Post-Crisis continuity. Over time she became less malicious and more bratty. Dr. Fate (being a doctor in psychology) eventually diagnosed the Dark Supergirl personality as a manifestation of Kara's survivor's guilt. This, incidentally, gives her the same status as another Silver/Bronze Age Supergirl villain, Nightflame. The potential character progression is laid out, just waiting for a new writer to pick it up.

I like this idea but a question? How can you have all these people with supermans powers but not bring back matrix,she part of supermans allies and was considered family the same way connor was?

This would make for a very short story. Whooping it up at a Nightclub, while obnoxious, is not illegal. At worst, the Legion could scold her, giving a severe talking to she’d never forget! At best, a certain Rick James tune would come back into circulation in the 30th Century.

Weirdly enough, this is kinda what the real Kara does for a bit in what Sasha calls her "Britney Spears phase"

That would have been an amazing Hellraiser comic

YOLO girl!

The struggle!

Not I. Hail Satan!

@@CasuallyComics The Gates run is pretty good. SG was good until Rebirth. Love that 90s soap opera writing.

Even in the 1960's 'satan' was essentially forbidden to say in public, not because it's "invoking" anything, the way nowadays people avoid saying Voldemort, but because it would encourage that kind of magical thinking. That was the whole point of satanISM, it's not about TALKING about the deceiver, it's about this reductive thinking in CALLING him "Satan", because that is ACTUAL blind faith the same way religious blasphemy lets children die of treateable illnesses. THAT is what offends Christians. The transition from "saturn" to "satan" is entirely straightforward. In the 1960's it wouldn't have meant ANYTHING more than "diabolical" today, and the name origin of saturn, satyr, and satan are all the same thing. The REASON it is religiously offensive, is the fact that it presents the deceiver in this false "this is what christians ACTUALLY believe" kind of public smear campaign way. When in reality, you ahve seen the businesses, that have been burned down in riots. Christians would call that "satanism" or "paganism" because it IS this notion of corrupting secularism into a cavalcade of witch hunts. ANYBODY should call it diabolical, or any other words that you can still use, before revisionists smear that word as well. The same people who would decriminalize delibarate spreading of HIV, and call it "I'm just being diabolical, a little cheeky rascal, and I'm proud of it" as they ruin lives. -_-__-_- Keeping the name "satan girl" seems to be a deliberate decision to use it CORRECTLY, no different than naming her after ANY of the apocryphical deity names like Kronos or Hades, like "satan" actually is. The biblical mentions are that kind of English translations, just words that have weird English origins because the language is so irrationally spoken. Satan and angels are not CHARACTERS in the bible, that is secular pop mythology the same way Sauron was not an ACTUAL giant falming eyeball in LotR BOOKS. That is "secular" world being WAY MORE RELIGIOUS than Christians, and they ACTUALLY believe that we need a crusade against JK Rowling. THAT IS LITERALLY why Harry Potter is satanIC, because now when you allow magical thinking, the mob rule is ostracizing people who play the new video game online. Satanism is not this projected simple radicalism, by the regressive radicals who ACTUALLY believe that witch hunts and zero medical intervention are a good idea. In the church that is a CONTENTIOUS idea, but outside of the church it is smeared as the Christian mainstream, when in reality it is the NON-christ-like mainstream, promoted by all the radically atheistic governments like USSR. The trend to un-person individuals has been anti-christian atheistic, since the church abandoned it after the middle ages.

Satin girl.

That's how science works bro

Well, he is a telepath, maybe he is a merman after all 🤔

Only when he gets wet. It's Splash all over again, only with Patrick Stewart in place of Daryl Hannah.

The difference with Lana is that her device could be taken away or broken. Invisible Kid took a serum which permanently gave him powers. Colossal Boy also got permanent superpowers (not from a serum). Bouncing Boy also drank something that gave him permanent superpowers. It's not really being "born with" powers that is the issue. It's the whole "you have a gadget which might stop working leaving you powerless suddenly" that was the issue. The Legion didn't want unreliable heroes. That's why they rejected Storm Boy among others.

Karate Kid has entered the chat 😜

@@SimonMoon5 Okay, that makes sense. Also, probably why I’d suck at Role Playing Games.

Don’t tell that to the Lieutenant Marvels, or Uncle Dudley, or…..

That's brilliant and it makes since that they'd want to copy Captain Marvel and family since they were more popular than Superman for a while.

Silver Age Supergirl was basically Otto Binder picking up where he left off with Mary Marvel.

@Brandon Vout Fawcett's revenge !!! Ah ha ha ha ha !

Yes! Absolutely! And then she could change Satan Girl to Satin Girl, with the power to be wrinkle free and fabulous, dahlink!

I remember hearing that Nightcrawler was first conceived as a member of the Legion before his creator got to work with Marvel.

Lol they love that plot

My theory is that they dreaded a Wendy/Spooky/Lil”Devil team up! Your move, Comics Code…

They were probably able to get away with it because of the lack of other references to religion, same as this story. Aside from the names, there’s nothing religious about this story or Hot Stuff.

@@jpboursaw4469 HaHaHa! Triple threat!

@@megaman9393 That could be. Or maybe they slipped some Richie Rich money under the table, lol!

Harvey's other big characters included a literal witch and more than a few lost souls. Their rep for being wholesome kids' fare was already so well-established the CCA knew better than to tackle them about any of it. They'd have looked like idiots if they'd even tried. Well, more like idiots.

That white kryptonite, split her into two people with differing body types?

All of them.

I seem to remember that the Subs named the team themselves after failing to get into the big league; so I guess it isn't that bleak.

My assumption as well. More a knowledge of the horrible people in the 1960s than my own despicableness, I hope.