lol nice pun the north go north to anix british canada in that universe

But their plans went south

@@briandiehl9257 BA DUM TSS

"From the south, to southern south"

To win against the North, you must BECOME the North. ;)

I absolutely loves this part of the video

what was the unions circle?

@@thetexangamer8383 Canada.

World of Warships: I wonder if we could get a deal with that Unfinished London guy and not have our ad be something weird? Wait... or maybe that Internet Etiquette guy--there is no way we could be turned into some weird Nobbleberry spin off.

@BLiTZ Galaga only if you like your nations to win their founder's war lol

@BLiTZ Galaga, if our treacherous government hadn't "settled" with the yankees over the Trent Incedent, the British people, & more importantly, the Royal Navy were ready & willing to support the Confederacy against Yankee Aggression.

@@johnericedwards6495 That might have been a bit of a hard sell to the British public considering that the abolition of slavery was kind of a pet project of GBs at the time.

British public opinion was actually very divided on the Confederacy. Generally the upper class were more likely to have a favourable view of the South, while support for the South was a minority position for those in middle or lower classes. This can be seen in a study of papers of the time. Those aimed at the upper class, such as The Times, were generally pro-South, but those like the Morning Star and Daily News that were aimed at readers in middle and lower classes, were generally pro-Union. Britain was unlikely to enter the war because the loss of Canada was a practical certainty, and the cost far outweighed any benefits (UK could and did sell to both sides). Both UK and France had substantial stockpiles of cotton at the start of the war, which is why the cotton embargo the South instituted at the outbreak of war actually hurt the South diplomatically and financially rather than encouraging intervention by the European powers. UK also started to try and mitigate the impact by encouraging cotton growth in Egypt and India. It was not until the latter years of the war that cotton shortages started to bite, and by that stage most could see the writing on the wall for the South.

It’s like the south but southier

Pretty good title

@@Whatareyoudoinnhere I think you are too north to understand us southerners

New Justice maybe watch the video.

It's the south but more southern.

Damn, I must've missed it lol.

It's the best type

Bruh?

Dom Pedro II won't allay to the south

@@Ryan_Gosling3465 Errr... Theres this city in São Paulo called Americana that says otherwise....

@@efxnews4776 Dar abrigo é diferente de se aliar.

They would try, but at the end of the empire and so many agricultural conflict going on inside the country already I dont think it would be viable or profitable

Please correct me if I’m wrong, but the Golden circle never had a flag. Nor did Cody make one for this video. The flag depicted was one of the many flags the Confederate government officially adopted as the supposed nation’s official flag. The more famous saltine design was only officially adopted by Robert E. Lee’s army of northern Virginia, but never the pseudo nation as a whole. Look up CPG grey’s “not the confederate flag” video for more info on that. Sorry to come off as one of those “um actually” people.

delete that comment. just do it, you "umm actuallyyy" dude. also, r/woosh

well excuse me but the EU copied their design off the Betsy Ross flag.

Kilroy..... I got what you were trying to say.

You know what they say about scenarios like for example Nazi Germany winning WWII: It's easy, barely an inconvenience! You just need to do a few simple things: 1)do not take part in WWII; 2)do not be Nazi Germany. That's all. And here's the same thing... The CSA can't lose if it's not CSA and not fighting with USA to begin with. Let go of the slavery(to get popular support in Europe), restructure your agriculture away from such hard cotton focus(to make up for lack of slaves and to produce food for yourself), something the South lacked ironically), become french and british puppet in dealing first with Mexico and then with dismantling spanish empire in central and south america by proxy. Industrial capacity is covered by your two patrons. Without suicidal attack on USA you'd have around two decades before they'd attack anyway. Enough to restructure and reform this shell of a country, finish conquering said countries, move capital and even build Nicaragua Canal. Still very much impossible, but answers the question of: what about Civil War?

"Where you wanna go" -Deep south! "Thats what i like to hear!"

The Caribbean & Central America: Hold my rum

*sweet tea

@EmeraldWarhawk, the Caribbean involves the British. After defeating the yanks alongside the CSA we'll be drinking gin & tonic in Havana and Earl Grey in Philadelphia.😂😂😂

@Rafael Lopez, I think only the French failed because they allowed their slaves to take over Haiti. It wasn't a competition between the British, Dutch, French and Spanish to take over The Caribbean, we were always at war with each other all over the world especially the French.

Delete this comment

Joshua Rafaeil I will not

Daddy Donald I wouldn’t have it any other way

@@IsraelLuisGeerRivera-ff4cg u.s lost Vietnam war

@Fernando Aguirre no it was a tactical retreat, in all seriousness though we went to far. Cambodia wasn’t involved However we also didn’t go far enough. If we kept fighting the dead would not be in vain. But no, pol pot took over in Cambodia and minority’s were killed by being buried alive in Vietnam we screwed up. I think Cody made a video on Wilson I don’t know the reasons he gives why he’s the worst but let’s just say communism and Nazism was an indirect effect of his weakness which caused and still causes problems.

4 Years Late Sorry 😐 Britain declares war on the Japanese Empire (If they hadn’t already), but if the Japanese are trying to attack the US I guess they’d attack some other US Pacific Territory, well maybe they don’t get the territories out there cause of the civil war. i dunno. Maybe they attack a U.S. ship? If Britain went to war with Japan it would probably wouldn’t be fought much. They are just quite far apart. Probably from Hawaii and their other Pacific bases I can imagine a British-Japanese Naval Battle similar to the ones of the US and Japan in our timeline, and maybe Japan and the Us would engage in naval battle, perhaps though with large Us defeat, probably cause they’d have a smaller navy and overall military and be a bit poorer for decades after the American Civil War

Did someone say Kaisereich?

Okay but no Cuban empire, I don't want to be Fidel's bitch.

What if the Cool Sunglasses leader of Cuba won world war 1?!?!?!?!?!?

It would be the Caribean Empire/Imperio de los Caribes

Hola my fellow Cuban

Sounds about correctly accurately right

indeed

XD

In that timeline, a civil war (Britian vs US) creates a country that falls into Civil War (US vs CSA) that create a country that falls into civil war.

@@macaroon_nuggets8008 Sounds like China

*laughs in Jamaica*

@@jamaicanball6285 ayo bro we from the same country?

And know Haiti is the poorest country of the Americas. Good Job!

Ehh, most Haitians lived in basically slavery for over a century after independence doubt this would change as much as people think it would

60 LIKES

What book he has a book? Where do I get it

Why does he never advertise his book

@@Xpwnxage His Charictar is litterly holding it

isaac zerke Lol

Only JFK could fuck it up.

@@johnericedwards6495 Only George Wallace can fuck up the Cuban Missile Crisis :P

@@Urlocallordandsavior, l thought the Cuban Missile Crisis worked out OK. The reds backed down despite our annoying treacherous politicians.

@@johnericedwards6495 A more, aggressive, president than JFK, such as, I don't know? Wallace, even Reagan, could've taken us into WW3 with Cuba. I mean, even Eisenhower, another good president, fucked up with his mishandling of the U2 incident with the Soviets, by being too honest, same with JFK.

Then another war would happen, and eventually Mexico would loose, the country was so unstable to held such an army, however if somehow Mexico was able to organize itself and get decent weapons to fight back, the northern territories would still be full of Americans, so revolutions will still occur, and they would eventually become independent, leading to eventual annexation to the USA, or to become independent countries, although Mexico probably would be bigger than it is today, that's for sure

True they would probably have kept most of Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, and kept a good chunk of Southern California.

they couldn't have. but their plan was to retake texas and move upwards through the south encouraging slave revolts that would've ideally done most of the fighting for their forces so pushed forward..with growing instability in the homeland that inevitably forces the army home, with the american government feeding the secessionists arms in exchange for land if/when they win with the U.S army marching from the north while in the south you're dealing with a civil war the reality is though that mexico put up what resistance it could and lost, the U.S army on the other hand while taking alot of losses was nowhere near a limping dog mexico was plagued by secessionists and elites undermining unity even if they got their hands on top of the line gear the nation was falling apart at the seams, it would've postponed abit but ultimately still been a loss mexico was already a wounded mutt in no shape for a fight

Impossible.

I'd say the next episode should be basic spelling and grammar. Where exactly is americain

They'd get slaughtered

Zero chance. Brazil had an exotic diplomatic behavior on the continent. Although it was far from being a power (in any sense), and even it was a vast slaveholding nation, the Brazilian diplomatic ideal was almost a replica of the British one in relation to Europe: splendid isolation. Brazil only interfered to prevent disorder and imbalance in South America (particularly frequent in Argentina and Uruguay). Although they were cousins, and himself an inveterate Francophile, Pedro II never officially recognized Maximilian's government in Mexico (preferring to wait for the outcome of the situation), and the Empire of Brazil never even considered possibility of recognizing the CSA (for the same reason). Brazil welcomed CSA refugees first on a humanitarian principle, and secondly, because of the "whitening" policy adopted at the time, in accordance with prevailing racial theories. Although a slaveholder state, Brazil never adopted policies of racial segregation characteristic of the Anglo-Saxon states, and never conditioned the franchise of civil rights based on race. There is no point in speaking in "Portuguese" in this situation. Brazil had been separated from Portugal for half a century, and increasingly distant from its former metropolis. Although nominally an empire, it has always lacked an expansionist and universalist ambition - even forfeiting numerous opportunities to do so, such as Angola, Togo, Dahomey, Paraguay and Charcas.

Freedom Time slaver swine

Monsieur Z is that you!?

Cody did it better

The *real* alt history hub

Oh go

@@Valk369 they would have won if the french won the war against Mexico fast enough. The french left after the civil war was over cause American guns and ammo were flooding into Mexico to fight the french as well as civil war veterans. And thank god for that

I notice he does not touch that subject on how the Confederate states would have dealt with the Black Caribbean population. Personally, I don't think it would have went well for the Confederates.

Would california be independent?

@@mr.m1garand254 If the French had won the Battle of Puebla (5 de Mayo) they would have supported the CSA, that's why 5 de mayo is so important, it delayed the war for 1 year, and 1 year in 1860s north america would have changed history

Bruh the CSA army would have all died of yellow fever within a week

I mean the french has one huge downside they are french

Unlikely considering how close the US they would've pulled it off, especially considering how weak Haiti was

And they sure as hell wouldn't have Jamaica the most rebellious island in the New World.

@@hainleysimpson1507 and it wa still a British colony back then so an obvious no go for them.

@@hainleysimpson1507 they wouldn't have had Jamaica - the British controlled it, & the CSA's friendliest nations are likely the UK & France. Everything still owned by a European nation is off the table (maybe not the Danish Virgin Islands, which the US historically bought). The actual planned conquests would be the independent nations (which was just Haiti & the Dominican Republic - which fun fact, President Grant wanted to buy but was too unpopular with Congress & plagued by corruption scandals to go ahead with it) & maybe a victory against the Spanish for Cuba & Puerto Rico.

More like sharpening their machetes

Haiti would buttrape them like they did the French

I think at this time it was squarely owned by the United Kingdom, they wouldn't want to pick that fight.

@@4thHorsemam depends on the leadership of Haiti.

Jamaica was owned by Britain and a war against them in the 1800's would be super no bueno for the south since the British (or French) could single handedly destroy the south's economy with their navies. Haiti however would not be so safe.

With results similarly horrific as a Japanese victory in ww2, even!

@@RaidsEpicly Very likely

First a couple pale can't fight a two front war with slave revolution and a bunch of country that has more resources

@@recordstore2265 yeah it could actually.

I think Mexico would take it's land back.

Oh shit why do I remember that

The south had the better fighters. if the union didn’t have such massive advantages in numbers and resources the conferates would have won. I’m glad that didn’t happen though of course.

@@Jackholiday1025 im not

@killertaco8 the master is subbed to bearing and prager U so of course he likes the csa

@@Jackholiday1025 no, both had bad fighters, just the north had generals that were sitting on their asses until 1863

They moved it all the way from Virginia oo na na

Don't tell them but their ultimate goal was endless vacation in Varadero and other beautiful beaches, and get some tan

Some about east Atlanta nah nah nah

South couldn't win

@@recordstore2265 Wars are never won on paper only.

JOMASCR17 that is true he attacked Costa Rica and his army was defeated. Than the coalition army of Honduras and Guatemala finished the job at the capital.

@EzECris 305 political stability I guess?

@ᴇᴢᴇᴄʀɪs 305 I'm sure the answer to that is complicated. It's not just Nicaragua, though. When I lived in Honduras from 2013-15, Costa Rica had a reputation among most Hondurans I knew as basically "the one country in Central America that actually has its shit together." Costa Rica's economy is much stronger, its crime rates are much lower, its government is more stable and less corrupt, etc. than any of the "CA-4" countries. (Nicaragua, Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala.) Or at least that's what I heard. What I do know is that Costa Rica has a long history of being standoffish toward the rest of the region, and was the first area to secede from the short-lived Republic of Central America (an initial attempt to unite the whole region between Mexico and Panama into a single nation-state, except for Belize because it was a British territory at the time and did not become an independent country until the 1980's), which ultimately led to the total collapse of the Republic and the creation of the political map of the region that exists now. Maybe that's part of the reason--an isolationist tendency that has kept them from getting sucked into the various crises plaguing all the countries around them, kinda like Switzerland has done in Europe. I think there's also been a lot less meddling in Costa Rican politics by foreign countries (especially the USA), which has been a near-constant problem throughout the whole history of every other Central American country. E.g. the term "banana republic" originated in Honduras, apparently, and it originally referred to the corruption and instability created by US-based agricultural corporations (most infamously the United Fruit Company, now known as Chiquita) constantly bribing Central American government officials and instigating civil wars when the bribes didn't get them what they wanted. If there's a history of that in Costa Rica, I haven't heard of it, so if there isn't then maybe that's part of the reason they've managed to maintain more stability and avoid the violent chaos (or at least keep it to a minimum) that's otherwise been so common in the other Central American countries.

@@macdeus2601 That last part is what I came here to say. Costa Rica is lucky in that the US hasn't fucked with them over and over again, unlike say, Honduras, who has to go through coup after american backed coup

@@macdeus2601 Costa Rica definitely does not have a stronger economy than Guatemala or Panama and the part where you said where they are standoffish against other Central American states is more like them wanting to be different, not so much being able to fight them obviously due to the fact they have no military the only reason why Costa Rica has gotten a better rep than other Central American states is because instead of them putting up a fight against American imperialist corporations they bent a knee and struck deals and didn't resist!!!*

@Tall Jakee I believe that Maximilian though could have at least combated poverty more than The republic did But than again his supporters wanted to keep the Mexican peasants in poverty Maximilian I think was the only leader of mexico that cared for the Mexican people

They would start speaking French instead of Spanish then lol

@@grandinquisitor8335 que tan menso estas mijo? Que chingados te hace creer que un pais recientemente invadido por dos naciones imperialistas te hace creer que aceptaria asi nada mas a un extranjero impuesto sobre la nacion por ser "realeza"

@Sakkra101 dude first off Mexicans hate monarchy’s yeah Maximillian fell in love with the country but he still had the European ideology of a king that shit we don’t like here in Mexico

Probably it ends like the Norse.

They might have. Phoenicians who made such a trip would have been (or were) traders, not conquerors. Unless they walk into a city with lots of gold, it it is not obvious that it is worth the trip, compared to just hugging the African coast down south where there is gold and ivory to trade for.

Two words: *They Can't*

I think they or the Israelites did. Check out this link that describes an artifact they found written in paleo-Hebrew / phoenician writing. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/j9B4raWirtCtaIE.html

Yes or if Micheal Collins never signed the treaty that divide the land

Well Britain wouldn't have war but Ireland would. The Ulster Volunteers and Irish Volunteers would fight each other throughout the war while Britain sends a few troops to sort it out (not enough). Ireland would be a bloodbath but Britain has priorities in Europe and would ignore it. Because of this the home rule movement would disappear and be replaced with the Republican movement which would result in the war of independence starting in late WW1. This could see German support for the Republicans and a new front in the war. The central powers would still fail and the war of independence would go just like real life.

They need Vinland to survive as a colony

He should do a remake some of his other videos.

Colten? But your name is charles... something doesn't add up...

@@stillaliveplus1forme It's a mystery that will never be solved!

@@Charles-if9bw new Idea for alternate history video.... What if Coltens real name was Charles?

Can I call you colt? I like revolvers. And I think revolvers and the south are pretty fitting.

Amazing plot-twist

@EmperorJuliusCaesar just because you hate a religion, that doesn't make them a cult

@EmperorJuliusCaesar 1st there are people that convert into that religion other than being born into it 2nd yes, there are differences between cults and religions, just because you don't like a religion, that doesn't make it a cult 3rd that has started as a cult, that doesn't mean is still a cult, religions evolve 4th i don't know what are you refering by saying this: There's a reason they're not allowed in court....because everyone knows it's bs... if you think any of what you said debunked my way of thinking you are wrong

Fun fact.. England almost did that. Gladly for them they were capable to remove "Nazi" King Edward VIII using fact that he attempt to marry women outside nobility. They made few romantic movies about that.. lol.

Soo... an ideal playthrough of HOIV?

Gay

I have been trying to play that scenario but the fascists always lose the 2nd American Civil War.

then we could've defeated the true enemy, & the world presumably would have become a much better place

I think it sucks!

I read that Alexander wanted to conquer the Italian peninsula so Rome's history get changed.

He already made that video

@Sam Ilizarov no that was monsieur Z.

He'd find out China was a thing... and died from understanding his own insignificance:D

He would’ve die old

What if Toyotomi Couquered China.

I think you mean any Asian country. Remember: Japan and Korea had naval forces too. Still, good question.

@@wariodude128 well, maybe even Siberia, Inner Mongolia, Central Asia...

given the last few centuries of the Chinese empire were dotted with peasant rebellions, its safe to say any colonies would have been short-lived. worst case scenario, they actually cause the Empire to collapse sooner. how would China return to being a powerful nation after that I dont know, my knowledge of Chinese history doesnt allow me to predict that

@@696190 Or, the colonies would split off into a separate nation as China goes through yet another (not always peasant) revolution.

​@@696190 That is the thing. China didn't fail because it didn't colonize. China didn't colonize for same reason it did failed. Chinese Emperors at the time were convinced that they are greatest nation on the world full of barbarian, what can't offer it anything. It is why they exploration effort (what is important part here) was canceled and that why peasants rebellions happened. Even when technologically superior ships of British Empire arrived, Chinese capital treat them like shit punishing low rank officers who did see that fact and try react accordingly. So when British couldn't get what they want (tea) they start be aggressive even if after costly subjugation of India they didn't have money and patience for conquest anymore. They were forced to do so anyway. If China would continue exploration, they would encounter other empires beforehand and if they would stay open minded and adopt foreign tech like Japan, what has western firearms and English naval adviser, who was ironically one who convinced Tokugawa to kick out Spanish missionaries attempting to use they standard religious conquest tactic (before they close country, what was obvious mistake) they in fact could stay greatest empire on the earth. Adaptability is what in fact create Empires, not subjugation. Same rule was true also in case of Roman Empire what in fact "steal" most of they brilliant technology, which they were capable to use it in accumulated way.

1. Antarctica was green, long ago (in the Mesozoic Era; in the time when Dinosaurs lived there) Climate change and changing water currents, combined with continental drift moving Antarctica closer to the south pole compared to its previous latitudes, made the unique ecosystems there perish and new ones emerge, in the much colder conditions. That said, even 100 million years ago during the Early Cretaceous Period, life was harsh in the polar forests of Gondwanaland (the season climate included monsoons, and harsh winters in the twilight zone, where daylight lasted only a few hours of dim light every day, and Dinosaurs among other animals, had to cope with freezing conditions - some migrated away, others stayed) At the time, Australia and Antarctica were joined until they broke apart millions of years later. Dinosaurs and other prehistoric animals had lived in Gondwanaland since at least the Early Jurassic Period. The climates would have been generally stable and lacking major variety for tens of millions of years; global climate was remarkably stable and long lasting in the Jurassic Period, and in general it was a lush, warm and wet climate, with dual seasons (not the 4 we have now), cycling between wet and dry over and over for tens of millions of years. Though the polar regions were always cooler and drier than the tropics, or the equatorial regions, it goes to show how verdant and hot the world was, that the poles were never frozen over in this time and always pretty warm. Think, Mediterranean climates, rather than polar ones as we'd see them today (whereas in the bulk of the rest of the world, conditions were much hotter still, and the Dinosaurs lived in their golden age) Australia and Antarctica/Gondwanaland in that time, however, were undergoing gradual cooling until by the Cretaceous Period, things were getting cold. Temperate forests more like those seen in New Zealand today, were not as barmy in weather as they'd once been. As the rest of the world basked in glorious warmth, the poles did begin to cool much more noticeably. The crocodiles that dominated the waterways of the majority of the rest of the world, could not threaten to overwhelm the waterways of the great southern continent of Gondwanaland, for a long time. This allowed for strange relics such as Koolasuchus, a giant Labyrinthodont Temnospondyl (a huge Amphibian, 6 metres long) to survive when its kind had vanished from most of the rest of the world. These things were ancient long before the Cretaceous; in fact, their kind had evolved over a hundred million years before the time of the Dinosaurs, in the Triassic Period. They began to decline in the Triassic and plummeted in numbers in the Jurassic, as reptiles dominated - but the last remnants of their ancient kind, clung on in what is now Australia and Antarctica. The waters, too cold for their reptilian rivals to follow. However, the seas around the world were still dominated by marine reptiles. Eventually, these unique polar forests would be killed off by the continuing cooling of the climate, and a spectacular chapter of the evolution of life on Earth, was closed forever. Long before the time of the Dinosaurs, Gondwana/Gondwanaland, had been green too, during the times of the Permian Period and earlier, in a very different world. You have to go back to the Permian and Carboniferous to find ice on the poles (particularly in the Carboniferous glaciations) but that itself was a strange time. 2. The British Empire could not be beaten in the War of 1812. It held total naval superiority and there is no getting around that. Even had the British not bothered to send a single infantry soldier into battle, the navy alone could win the war by blockade. Not happening.

The US won the War of 1812 because if the Americans lost the US would be either be part of Canada or still be a British colony.

The history part of his videos,not so much. This video is full of errors when talking about Mexico and Cuba

YEE HAW

How many KZfaq channels do you have

@@danielguerrero2575 I have 3. But why do you ask?

How do we know you didn't just invent this "meme"?

@@redforest9269 search up "that's how mafia works"

Yeah!!!

@Big Tony then the Soviet Union would’ve became the Eurasian union.

@The Anonym Internet Surfer I know I found that out a few weeks ago.

Well, there was a secret society called "the knights of the golden circle". Basically many of the higher ups in the Confederate government were members of that secret society.

Nvm I commented too soon. Moar knowledgehub