So far 14,000 homicides in Mexico this year. Why , because people have no guns to protect themselves!!! Where is the chart on that!!!

Why is my country not on 2:23 ? Korea has the most suicides in the world and also is in g20

And has zero weapon suicides

FREEDOM 1 first off, we’re discussing developed nations.. this does not include Mexico. Also, Mexico has issues with the cartel. America doesn’t have this problem.

@Dusk Patriot *Cries in Detroit*

tachi you watched the crowder video to?

Logan Gwin I know it from relatives in PF and chatter within the chans.

lol you're clearly an invested researcher on the topic when you spell it homosides

just one word is it for mocking others to shut them down?

Ryan Yantz lol i dont have any real opposing point to be made against the argument so im gonna call out their grammar! ha! score! *please read in the tone of voice of a degenerate beavis and butthead style character*

Mikey Hagan, Jr. You have a nice day too. :)

+KETimiko nice comeback bro

Komix Blasty "Kill them with kindness" is my motto. Thank you. *takes hat of and bows*

Well, if you learned to tie a knot properly you would be here either. I have depression too, doesn't mean I should blame people who have te right to self defence.

Are you going to actually come up with a point or are you just going to continue to fail at being a troll?

Maybe not criminals but ammunition and gun stores will follow them if USA is a law based society as I know it claims to be. Crimes by guns can't be completely stopped but they can be reduced and that is what US lawmakers should be trying to do.

Aviral Gupta no no no ,his point is that if you want to get a gun you can get it illegally it’s not hard

With a conservative Supreme Court, gun control bills will be shot down.

@Newsweek this is true. You don't need a gun to do it. So what's next? Mass knife, car, and medicine bans? All three can also be used in mass killings. Its not the tool, it's how you use it.

Yeah it may not stop all of them but it still stops some and stopping some is better then stopping none

+King Kasper Hi there - thanks for this note. It's always tough to decide which countries to include, so we simply used the top 10 countries on the UN's Human Development Index. hdr.undp.org/en/composite/HDI

+King Kasper Did u watch and listen to the video brah? 2:07 if u wanna hear it for urself

+King Kasper Solid comment, but the fact that you cherry picked such a non-essential "data point" to get worried about, that you are biased :-/

+King Kasper totally agree. Just visited the UN Human Development Reports and it shows that Japan is at 26.9 suicides and S.Korea is at 41.7 while the US sits at 19.4. (All data regarding deaths per 100,000 males in 2015). Looking at this data, I'm unsure on Vox's argument implying that less guns will mean less suicides, since there are so many other easy ways to take your own life in a developed country. (S.Korea & Japan have extremely strict gun control and civilians have no access to guns) I personally think it would be much more difficult to use a gun vs. overdose on over-the-counter drugs, jump, etc... But then again that's just my opinion; you would need more data and research to make any good conclusion.

Quit whining for gods sake. Think about the video. Does it make the problem less worse when you compare it to more Countrys? Or do you just want to point the finger at them saying: "We have no Problem. Other Countrys are not better." USA. You Have a huge Problem. Admit it, Fight it, End the Killing!

+gamejaw Better get a Glock before that slide breaks on that Beretta! :p

+gamejaw Berettas are crap, replace with Colt or something.

l337pwnage haven't had a problem yet had it for a couple years now i love it dude.

gamejaw This is my problem with a Beretta: you point it at someone and if they are close enough, with one hand, they can be like, "Here, let me take that apart for you."

gamejaw Odds are you won't have a problem, I just love giving Beretta owners crap about it. :p If you were concerned, it probably wouldn't be hard to look up and see exactly what models/serial numbers were affected by the issue. I'm pretty sure they fixed it. It's like the famous "Glock KaBoom!" that people like to talk about. ;)

And is right next to Indiana

@Tovah Gladstone your point?

@@swamp1634 look up indiana gun laws. While it does require a license to carry a handgun, there is little to nothing required to purchase one. You can have as many laws against something as you want, if it's easy to get and plentiful in the next town over, people will get it.

chicago also has one other the most dangeours gamgs in USA explain that then

@@greatehien1398 over policing of minorities makes it so, after being convicted of a felony, they can't get a job anywhere and need to make money in illegal ways.

🤣 what?

Lucky

Mine did, had to put him down.

So you wouldn't mind getting them registered and let them take part in some safety training?

@@hexcodeff6624 oh no trust me I do mind

No that is only the gun extremist that would seem to want to do that. The thing is, the gun lobby has billions of dollars, for their gun zealots, give until it hurts and it bleeds.

Some already have....

The MEJ 11% of the total is a lot! Bigger than I thought.

Buying guns, and related paraphernalia, is an addiction for some. That addiction runs tyrannically over the family as the next fix is sought.

Medovukha That does not bother anyone. The flood of guns in the US means a lot of trickles down to criminals and crazies.

www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/nov/08/facts-mass-shootings-united-states/

where?? Give the link

Azizjan Ayupov kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f7t8hqdpu928dac.html

Sandy Gonsalves so I will not omit facts like “politifact” did. I’m going to just say a couple of the omitted facts they left out. Now I will admit some of what they said is true but you can read a biased slant all over that article. Next, the study they talk about in this article only covers a 5 year span and they still leave out the fact that year by year mass shootings were on a steady decline. It’s been statistically proven that these mass shootings are down. Next thing they leave out of that study is the vast majority of these mass shootings happen in urban areas where strict gun control legislation is in place and the ability to legally own guns is extremely hard or impossible. Law binding citizens will not illegally buy or own a fire arm but criminals don’t care. So of course in those areas, especially the area with high gang activity, illegal gun crimes will be extremely high. Also if you take those areas out of the equation gun crimes stats would drop significantly to the point where they are insanely low. I just wanna make sure you read this point, the 100% omitted the fact gun crimes are in a decline in the US but I’ll also add that they are dropping even faster since the Clinton era ban on “assault weapons” expired several years ago. Next, the shooting they start off talking about they decided to leave out the facts that a authorized Trainer from the NRA used his AR15 and his incredible marksman skills he obtained through training with the NRA and other training he received in his lifetime to not only kill the shooter but he also stopped him from killing more people and stopped him from escaping. That man put his life on the line, used his training properly and defended his community in a time of need. So before posting a article that you wish to use to argue the fact that gun violence has been in a decline in the United States check it and make sure it can even stand the smallest amount of scrutiny.

Oli K not to be rude or anything, but how is statistical facts not convincing

Yeah, all those other countries with gun control are really suffering with their... Lack of deaths....

@@whistlingbanshee5038 Gun control wont work when thier are already 300 millions legally own firearms in the U.S

@@beverlywilliams8458 cough Australia cough. It 'wont work' because you wont let it work.

@@whistlingbanshee5038 Australia doesnt gave a 2nd amendment like America.

@@beverlywilliams8458 its an AMENDMENT. Meaning change. It wasnt in the original constitution but added in in 1791. You can change the constitution with Referendums. Its done all the time. Heck Ireland did it with the Abortion referendum. And the Marraige referendum. And Divorce referendum. Because stuff that was written hundreds of years ago is outdated in todays society. Gun control can and does work. But the American people wont let it.

But should we really be listening to someone who doesn’t know the difference between, “no” and “know”?

braedonxo His grammar isn’t on point but his common sense is

I see what you did there... Don't you guys get it? It's subliminal!

@@braedonp hahahhahaha

+Chad Schuster Right all these liberals saying I could buy a minigun from the local supermarket for about $5

U can literally go to a fucking cabellas and be like ya I want that revolver please!

+John Steadman ,but they wont be like k here u go byyyyy

+Chad Schuster It is relatively easy. but that graphic was incorrect it said all we had to do was say '2nd amendment ill take three arbitrarily defined assault weapons" we do have to register. We have to carry a license for a lot of gun usage.

+Enjoy Risky go ahead and try it and report back how that works out for you.

It is a step down the path to it. You are delusional if you think it is not. The only motivation in any politician's mind is "How do I stay in power and benefit the most?" Believing that the human nature of any man is above that of Assad, Lenin, Lukashenko or even Hitler, is delusional at best. If that politician thinks they could get to and stay in control of a reasonably wealthy nation by taking the route of direct dictatorship, they would do so. Human nature is fundementally bad. Selfish, greedy, self-centered, irrational, emotional, immature, and tribal. I have literally never heard a convincing rational (Not emotional "but we give to charity", "but the purge isn't realistic" bullshit) argument to that.

That's not what people are suggesting. It is our legal right to be allowed to own a firearm. When you start to add some regulations who's to say they can't add more? They're are saying more gun control can lead to a ban on guns.

I say mandatory gun courses every year or 2 years starting at 6 years of age. Even if you don't own a gun when you get the opportunity to do so (at 18, 21, 25 whatever age it is) you still need to do the courses. Ignorance is what makes people afraid of guns.

pepelapiu2004 Watch the video dumb ass

laanyan d

Well, being Canadian u live most of your life in confusion.

@@iwishiwaswrongbutimnot517 what

@@sumopanda5394 there u go.

@@iwishiwaswrongbutimnot517 makes no sense but okay

Most schools don't have metal detectors.

abner bautista 😂 Hey!!! You got the point!!

yep in the USA its about thirty times higher that for the EU mate.

Because they are the definition of disingenuous.

They literally show a graph that has homicides with guns and without

How would gun control help with police militarization, corruption and brutality? Wouldn't the state having more control over the population's guns only give corrupt police more power?

Those same people say those tactical weapons are no deadlier than other guns, yet it their weapon of choice if they were to wage war with a 'tyrannical' government! Even if semi-auto, those are weapons of war.

+Patrick Butler It's not really working now, is it? Unless you are suggesting that civilians start shooting cops.

Idk what your stating here. You see the people I base my principles on is Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and John Locke and neither of these people believed that government corruption was a good thing in fact they fought a war over it. I believe we should live our lives freely unless we impede on someone's life, liberty, and property which is John Lockes principles of law. No one has a say who can or cannot defend themselves because self defense is something people own themselves so if you were to take away self defense you are stealing from the people.

Mark Nay You can call anything civilian. His weapon WOULD STILL TAKE OFF YOUR LEG in what ever mode. To dumb it down, those weapons SHOULD NOT BE DEEMED 'CIVILIAN'. Weapon of war.

Matthew North because they took the guns from the innocent!

In Netherlands almost every one use bicycles for traveling within the cities and due to that there are lots of bicycles and due to that there are lots of bicycle thieves. And ignore Jason D comment he thinks guns can solve anything and without guns human race can't survive but in reality its otherwise.

What guns? Guns in the Netherlands have always been in the hands of the military, trained militias (centuries ago) and a few underworld figures

But I just fed a troll, I think

Because they don't have guns to defend themselves.

what do you propose we do abt the problem?

This video was NOT good. It didn't address the things that HAVE changed as violence increased. Look at school shootings by young shooters. It's not the guns that changed, it's things like violence in media and prescription anti-depressant drugs. I wonder if you knew that the machine gun was invented over 200 years ago. If you have a change in violence, you have to correlate it to other things that have changed. Guns haven't changed significantly in a hundred years.

@@aaaaaaaawwwwwwww What we need to do is change the toxic society that is causing more violence, NOT to make the country more of a totalitarian state. Guns didn't create this toxic society, and increasing gun control won't solve the problem. Reduce violence in media, eliminate corruption in pharma. Eliminate some of the stressers like endless wars for corrupt profits. Having said that, I do agree with better gun regulation, not more, just better. For example: increasing the age of gun ownership to 25. Kids brains haven't fully developed prior to age 25.

@@carljensen5730 completely agree

@@carljensen5730 and how do you propose we change the toxic society in a efficient manner?

Matthew Kirchin How would we limt teeroists, muggers, ect. from getting guns?

Portal Pony guns should be banned permanently

It would only make law abiding citizens unable to defend themselves against the people who will get guns wether or not they are legal.

you think there were some gun owners at the latest mass shooting? probably..unless you have a gun on you and ready to shoot at the exact time some mad man or someone trying to shoot you pulls theirs then it doesn't matter if you have one..and who's to say you won't go crazy one day and start shooting people?

Just because guns aren't around doesn't prevent me from being stabbed to death.

Like what?

KingBobXIV go watch Steven crowders video on this. He debunked the shot out of it. This video is straight up propaganda. You may not even watch it, but I’m telling you, go in with an open mind and watch the whole thing.

Hunter Morris how can this video be defined as propaganda? This video was in no way biased or misleading. They’re just saying the facts.

Mike Lindell go watch Steven crowders rebuttal of it 😂😂😂 you’ll see

@@hunter0161 You should probably be able to defend your side without telling people to go watch a different video and not giving any info TWICE

But what about the statistics?

@@lordimyre3685 But how does that make the statement "There's a correlation between gun count and gun deaths" false? I anything all you're criticizing is the build-up of the video, not the conclusion.

@@lordimyre3685 no they aren't. They're facts, stop being ignorant Conservative. Facts dont care about your feeling.

Dallas Segno yea!! And it europe

I checked it, the USA have pretty much the same amount of stabbings compared to the eu

@@redunicorn7760 oh that's a big oof my guy

Ahh good to see you’re going away from the issue here. Obviously knife crime rates are the same, there are little to no knife regulations in most countries.

How about drug crime stats, you hold 50 grams of meth in China, you are a dead man.

Using a graph specifically from 2008-2009 definitely seems like cherry picking to me, thanks for the recommendation

how do i find the video

Yeah I was going to sub him until I read he was from Fox news

***** He's not "from Fox News", he just once worked there a while ago.

Okay well however you like to phrase it lol

+T -Val Then refute his arguments with facts, just like he refuted this video with facts. If you can (which I seriously doubt).

@@Valleri1957ify then watch his video and tell me exactly what he said that was wrong or what he lied about.

what do you mean?

clearly did not watch the video

+J ronnn Do you really need a gun though? Seriously? You don't. You don't rely on it for food or protection. It's not saying you can't have a gun, simply that to procure and maintain ownership of one should be more difficult. What the rate of gun suicide shows is a reflection on the rate of spur of the moment deaths. If there were less guns around, you'd obviously see a drop in these. It's not just suicide, it's domestic killings, blind rage shootings and drunken misunderstandings.

+J ronin I think it was implied that the fact that you have individual liberties, you have a higher chance of successfully taking your own life. It's kind of an oxymoron.

+J ronnn "individual liberty" is to own a gun? You don't know what "liberty" really means, don't you?

+J ronnn Did you skip the entire part about homicide?

It fails to mention that the states with the most regulated strictest gun laws have the most deaths and in fact you do need a firearm safety license to obtain a firearm in my state at least

+Shuma Gorath Really? what states?

Not all gun rights activist or narrow minded, there just upset videos like this don't mention other variables.

+Gon J not true

+Shuma Gorath And said gun deaths are caused from out of state guns.

They also don't tell you about the crime in your state run media because if the gun wasn't registered it isn't their problem. Sorry, a few friends from UK talk and say "aight".

Yep 😂

+Dakkaroni Spoken like a true idiotic american, well done!

+CXS1181 lol pew pew MERICA

+CXS1181 what's your solution?

But the fact that you feel that way just shows how bad the problem has gotten. In my opinion, a free individual doesn't need to buy a weapon to protect themselves or doesn't have to worry about being shot when going out to the movies or going to school. We aren't free anymore in the US because of gun violence.

+Dakkaroni Take the fucking guns away, duh... Its not rocket science

+xCrimsonxTidex Lol Calm down, grammar Nazi.. Even though she immediately corrects it. "Propaganda.." looks like basic statistics from the World Health Organization.

ChronicCuber It does "look" like it, but it is steered to the anti-gun agenda. I don't feel like explaining, so I'll let this guy do it. /watch?v=IULSD8VwXEs

xCrimsonxTidex Looks like it's steered towards the gun-control agenda.. God forbid we actually look at a problem, so much easier to shout propaganda and discredit studies with a video of a guy ranting about how technically some of the statistic aren't directly related to legal-gun owners and keeps saying "see, see here is where they trick you.. NOW they just changed topics, trying to trick you again by addressing multiple issues, nobody just talks about one thing and correlates it with another.." I like how he doesnt cover that yes perhaps legal ownership isnt as large of a problem as interpreted by some, and also just says "See look, the US is about the same for homicides compared to other countries that have legal gun owners" which does not fairly compare and completely ignores that these other countries have much more strict acquisition and different licencing processes.. Illegal firearms are still a problem because the access is an issue.. There are so many loopholes for people to acquire weapons..Gun shows, trading, friends, theft, certain state laws etc.

+xCrimsonxTidex I believe it says "Obama Era"

+xCrimsonxTidex You mean OBAMA-ERA isn't a hyphenated proper noun?

a shooting killing at least 4 people

There’s no legal definition either way so anyone can call 3 deaths a mass shooting

Fleetleader101 the lack of respect for human life is disgusting, i hope you realize what’s wrong with this statement and learn to love other people

@@cailynjoy8129 who says we don't? I respect human life, but MY life comes first.

@Fleetleader101 their chart excludes gang violence and terrorism, which probably means they don't include drive bys

these people are lying when they say there are no background checks. Mostly because these are the type of people who will never touch a gun and so they just listen to what OTHER people who will never touch a gun say about the matter. If they actually went and tried to buy one, they'd be surprised.

How many career criminals in your state jump through the same hoops before they pick up any firearm they want from a thriving black market? That's why all these requirements they make you go through are nothing more than gun safety theater.

RylanHasBucket but these shooters aren’t criminals before they commit their crime, if that makes sense. There is no way that banning guns would not decrease buying and circulation.

Read the NOTE part at the bottom of the screen

@@arthurb8436 *your username

Justin Howell Would you like me to show you how you were outright mislead and lied to by this video?

Just because it's the truth doesn't mean that people will listen to it.

pepelapiu2004 i would please

pepelapui2004 Go ahead. explain why I was misled

Steven Crowder exams the stats of this video Allot of opinion in this.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f7t8hqdpu928dac.html

Good job, I like you, you saw the light

Vox is pretty left.

same

Same!

Fully automatic assault vans are vehicles of peace. Behead those who insult Automatic assault vans.

Hannah Doppelpunkt Klammer Using my Physic knowledge I predict this comment will get in between 200-500 likes

Máximo Ernesti Vila Echagüe he got 118

@@maximoernestivilaechague9121 119!😎

They want to distract you from their mistakes like how guns replaced knives and never increased much.

+No Google I don't want to use my real name who the fuck has ever argued that firearms are the only arms covered by the second amendment? the only reason anyone focuses on firearms is because that is what the Feds are trying to ban/regulate.

+No Google I don't want to use my real name "Why should we not have a right to wear machetes? Or any other type of weapon?" i believe we SHOULD have to right to wield whatever we want... within reason. The right to have firearms is because it is the most deadly form of defense. It makes you the most capable to defend yourself. Thats why the right does not extend to anything else. Because they do not really matter when compared against guns. Im pretty sure you can wear a machete on your hip if you want... i mean... no ones stopping you

+No Google I don't want to use my real name Yeah, why should we have Rights like free speech and the Right to bear arms when so many other countries don't? I'm with you, let's abolish all logic! You point is a bit silly, but I will try to explain it to you. All rights are "truly necessary for the country" if we are to remain free. No right is above another, but each are equally important. In regards to the 2nd Amendment, I guess the simplest way to say it is that it gives citizens the opportunity for self-protection and self-preservation against not only criminals, but also intrusive governments. It is what established this country and separated us against King George.

+Marty McSuperfly kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eK6Go5iorrKymHU.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/d9J2obNy3squl58.html

I am pro gun but you just got own by Vox.

Fucking Click bait, they don't say shit so they can rack up more view time.

+Vox So you basically showed that you agree that in fact there are many other things that kill way more than guns in the US but still support your bullshit claims in this video? You do know that the UK has twice the amount of violent crime than in the US right? And that countries that fully embrace firearms culture are much safer places to live such as Switzerland and Finland. Why do you people keep coming after firearms when that obviously isn't the problem? Where do you see most of these homicides happening? oh i forgot, Compton, Detroit , WASHINGTON FUCKING D.C.; It is insane that you guys can believe any of this bullshit. "lol facts stand, look at this chart bro" *pulls out a sheet of paper that says: NUMBER OF GUN DEATHS EVER: A LOT*

+Marty McSuperfly Every country has death by medical malpractice but they don't have a gun problem like the US

Australia’s government didn’t murder 297 Native Americans when they went to confiscate guns committing the largest mass shooting the US history. You can fact check me but I’m pretty sure that’s the largest mass shooting in a 1st world country.

You're right, we should privatize roads and eliminate driver's licenses.

@@Nanofuture87 Good luck finding many to support that idiotic idea.

@@DoubleGoon Thanks for the support, though it's not idiotic. Roads being public are a source of many problems like traffic jams and suburban sprawl.

+The Tactical 6 String Because even moderate people are against such a thing. When you try to create propaganda and brainwash people, you can more easily get your way once you've fooled them. Make no doubt about it, these people realistically want an outright ban on firearms.

"Wow, why dont you just come out and say you'd like to have a gun ban" Because most "pro gun control" people don't want "a gun ban"? Just because Fox says "da libruls" are going to "steal ur guns" and force you to be gay transsexual muslim atheists doesn't mean any of that is actually something the left wants.

+anjoskold Why should I defer to the constitution over what is clearly better for the country?

I think James Madison and Thomas Jefferson knows more of what's good for the country than you ever will.

anjoskold No. They don't. They're dead. They wrote for their time. Not mine. They thought that a black man constituted 3/5ths of person and that women shouldn't have the right to vote. Thus, I don't have to take their opinions seriously.

Then get the fuck out of the country they made.

anjoskold Why would I do that when I can just support changing the constitution? You realize that's been done many, many times, right? Like when slavery was abolished and when blacks and women got the right to vote?

Who is to say those citizens won't use those guns either criminally or in any self harm? You don't need guns, they're a luxury. Yes it is a part of the U.S. constitution that citizens have a right to bear arms but do you need a semi automatic rifle with a 72 magazine to go hunting? Or to defend your home? To defend against what? Other guns? We don't need guns

@@docwulff907 You don't need guns. That is all that you can attest to as you don't know anything about what other people have to deal with so don't speak with any authority for them or me. Violent offenders are stopped thousands of times each year by armed citizens that refused to be victimized. Even the likely possibility of a victim being armed serves as an effective deterrent to preventing crime or an attack.

@@docwulff907 I can have as many as round as I want and there is nothing you can do about it.

@@docwulff907 who are you to say what people need? Why is need even being argued?

Seems like you want to regulate them? hmmmm

As long as the NRA has any sway in politics it will probably never happen

@@uwbollema that is only one of the many, many, many other financial reasons why it is not in the best interest of wealthy politicians who own stock in firearms manufactures will never do anything to harm that industry

we already have much more effective systems for record keeping

Peaceful slavery or violent freedom

​@@autonomous9031 . I got news for you. Disarming and heavily regulating firearms for civilians wont solve anything. You can buy ANY type of weapon from cartels at the US/mexico border. Mules have FULLY automatic weapons, silencers and about any piece of firearm "candy" you want. For a bag of cash and the only background check they do is look behind them to make sure you are in line. laws are for civilians ie "We are their peasants". Criminals could care less.

General Esdeath Yes but how big is Switzerland.

As a swiss I have to say, those are usually military-guns - which means, that the gun owner underwent training and backgroundcheck. Furthermore we also no longer have Ammo in our houses, cause we're not in a state of war.

so the problem is the dumbass people that live in the USA

@@rubenva1258 pretty much, a lot of thugs and crazy people

what's your source, is their per capita crime rate worse, what are the gun laws in the surrounding states/areas? Because if you say chicago I will tell you that the gun laws in indiana are so soft that I could honestly send a 14 year old on a bus ride down there give him money for an uber to a gun show and he could probably come back with a legally bought gun.

... there is? gun control... it's in the news

Because people here don’t like the solutions. Punish violent felons more severely. Better background checks. Enforcement of existing gun laws. Mandatory training for gun owners. Close gun sale loopholes. Fewer guns in circulation.

obvious solution: regulation

They did allude to regulations... They pointed to all the other well-developed nations and the programs they have in place and then compared it to the USA. Though they didn't directly say that you need to do this to fix the issue, it is probably because of how intensely polarising that is for a wide audience in a video designed to lay down facts and evoke empathy. No one is here saying you can't have guns in your country. Just don't make them so readily available.

@@Dylan28969 And to not just anyone with zero training or proper screening.

Then I don't want to be right

very true I m glad that there are some liberals with common sense and I hope you realize that hillary is not a viable candidate for the upcoming election, just consider her many scandals... benghazi, her helping her husband rape women and get away with it, etc

The way America is waging the drug war is wrong. We will never win at this rate we need to strike the problem at the heart- this will sound insane but we need to take this war to the cartel villages of Central America and South America

I usually agree with moderate republicans and libertarians

we dont want to win..........

Awesome! It'd be nice to see this thing become less of a right - vs- left thing and gun rights to be just a plain American thing.

Wow, when you have literally no facts to back your claim you resort to name calling, pathetic.

wut

DeltanStudios Steven Crowder used facts to debunk this video

February 14th 2018 debunked his video.

100 years from now. The states will always be the same, leave those animals alone. Let the Aussies, greenlanders and Canadians thrive?

Can you elaborate? Do they have any policies in Chicago that makes this city different than the others?

Henri D wel according to USATODAY.com , in 2016, shootings are up 88 percent in Chicago , and the murder rate is up 72 percent. What differs Chicago from other cities? In Chicago you are required to have a license in order to purchase ANY firearms, ALL purchases of firearms have waiting periods, Open carry is BANNED.

BlakeBiundo I see. People would still still be able to bring their guns from outside Chicago though..? Also, what are the stats compared to?

Henri D states are compared to last year, also, you should see the chart posted on this website. illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2011/10/chicagos-violent-crime-rates-plummet-after-scotus-removes-handgun-ban.html

if the us had tough gun control then "People would still still be able to bring their guns from outside America though..?" through the open southern border

Are you genuinely looking for an answer. If so I will do my best to explain. I am no expert but if you do want to know I will do my best to explain. Let me know if you would like me to attempt to answer your question. Best wishes, Simple Security

AK variants are some of the best hog rifles

Simple Security You can secure yourself with a regular pistol or shotgun or hunting rifle. If you need a light machine gun then your just compensating for something honedtly

Are you referring to my original offer to explain why anyone would need an AK-47 ,or these other guys?

+Simple Security I'm replying to your explanation

Im not american and i dont know anything can anyone tell me which one is innacurate

Yeah so just where all the gang shootings happen?

+Chris Coulter they get guns from the states with no gun control obviously thats why gun control needs to be nationwide

.

David the Gliscor I see, so it's kind of like how junkies get their heroin, methamphetamine and crack cocaine from states that have no drug laws?

Chris Coulter then lets get rid of those laws then that would things better right?

laanyan The difference is that every other right has a purpose. I should clarify that I meant semi auto handguns above a certain calibre and capacity, i.e. ones unsuitable for self-defense. As for assault weapons, they have too few uses and too many risks associated with them to be sold to people of unsound mental health.

laanyan Besides, many of your rights still need documentation to be valid e.g. you need a licence to operate a motor vehicle and you need identification to vote in many states.

laanyan The AR 15 is a solid home defence option, true enough. But why should you be allowed to openly carry them.

laanyan OK then, but voting is a hell of a lot more important than the second amendment and you need more paperwork for that than you need when you buy a gun.

So what do you think we do? We just walk into a WalMart and walk out with an fully automatic M240?

It’s not quite that simple. Guns are a part of American culture, and until this country changes its culture, there will remain people who defend gun rights.

Funny how guns save between 1 and 3 million lives every year but you think banning guns will save lives. Edit: 500,000 to 2,000,000 depending on where you get the stat from, not 1-3 million.

@@cameronjohnson5256 Would be interested to know where you got those numbers from

@@cameronjohnson5256 Yet the number of deaths from gun suicides alone outnumbers the lives saved. As the conclusion had mentioned: America has multiple gun problems. Which problem would USA want to prioritize: gun suicides, the type of gun deaths with the highest fatalities. Solve that, and gun deaths will drop a lot.

@@dirkmiehle2099 Sorry for the late response, I didn't get the notification. The CDC said 500,000 to 2 million every year. So I got it wrong.

And its also funny that your goverment has a lot more control over you, yes you German we have seen the riots 😂

@@Shark_Arise in germany 70 people died from gun violence last year. In America 40,000. Small difference

@@Jonathan-zl7ej knife crime in Germany is way higher than the United States 🤔 funny less guns In Germany too.

@@devindixon9009 homociede rate usa 6.383 germany 0.823. USA has 7 times more homocieded per captia despite beening the "richer" country .

Natalia c This is one of the best thongs I have read so for in the comments of a video for gun control.

True. Why the mass shooting is happening in the first place? Why guns (which can only shoot) is easily accessible? Just like a disease, find the root problem. If Americans think keeping gun is a right, well many of us lacking that unnecessary right and living happily and safe. Psychological health is essential and having psychological problems is not to be ashamed of, it should be addressed as quickly as physical problems.

And moral value for other human life has diminished.

You clearly didn't watch the video. The problem with guns in the US is that so many people have them.

NO MA'AM so we should just let people have the weapons to make this possible. That makes sense... Also your argument isn't really relevant since the weapons we have today are far more powerful than guns we've had in the past. Furthermore, public gatherings that are the ideal space to make public shooting possible are far more common in light of the increased denseness of population in the US. Also, your argument ignores a huge part of the problem. Suicide and homicide are a huge problem that, as this video shows are woefully exacerbated by the epidemic of gun ownership in the US.

xD

😂

Tf you on about she said it right

@@chinesesymbol3899 play it w/out sound

That’s short for “Oblame Obama for gun sales.”

Thanks for your useless opinion! We are going to ignore it!

@@Crupyto when you include things like terrorism to gun homicides after saying you'll exclude terrorism and constantly use undefinable terms, of course the stats are skewed.

I guess that they all feel "attacked" and need to "defend" themselves. All I can say is that because the country where I live has waayyyy stricter gunlaws than the US I dont have to fear being shot at school, on the street or by police who assume that everyone has a gun and is triggerhappy. As much as this video emphasised deaths, gun control also improves quality of life (or at least for me and a lot of people in my country it does).

@@Thim22Z7 no, u get worry about being stabbed. A much harder trauma to treat. And yes, a stab wound is harder to operate on than a gunshot. U also don't have many of the rights that we do in America. And your government can make u do whatever it wants u to do. And u r completely defenceless. And where ever u r from has a much different society. And it is one that we don't want to digress into. America is the ONLY place on earth with a freedom of speech. That is the right that we use first. And it usually keeps the peace. But in case of our government trying to overtake us, we have our second amendment. U dont. U r sitting ducks. Not only from your government but from any other government that wanted to easily overtake your people. And deny it all u want, but that is a fact. So seeing that u don't know what it is like to be able to fully defend your self u wouldn't know what is would be like to have someone try and take that. Under the blanket of "helping" us. Yeah, no thanks, I'll take my chances on staying free. And my quality of life is among the best in the world. Not an opinion. Or to the amount that it is, the rest of the world must agree as well. More people from more countries get on a list to be allowed to move here than anywhere else on the planet. They are not trying to move to your country in that amount. So stay vulnerable, and I'll stay safe. Peace.

@@iwishiwaswrongbutimnot517 But at the same time, knives are far more limited range than guns. Guns can be deadly from long distances, while knives require the victim to be close enough to be effective. The rest is irrelevant. The issue here is gun deaths, and there are multiple gun problems. If USA would want to reduce the gun deaths by a huge margin, it would prioritize gun suicides, as it has the highest fatalities. Regarding Second Amendment, that will only work if the armament is either equal or favours the people. But since the government's arsenal is much more than just guns, citizens have a tall order to make the Second Amendment effective.

I know guns shouldn't be an obsession, this is very serious topic.

But by banning guns it would also make it harder for criminals to get them illegally.

@@OzCroc actually it would be easier as there would be a higher demand so sequentially more illegal guns would be sold

@@OzCroc After all, banning certain drugs make it harder or gangs to make it.

@@mobilegamesonly3170 So drugs should be legal?

@@OzCroc certian ones, yes. If they are legal, you make less by selling them illegally. This discourages making them.

LETS START A BATTLE ROYALE!

If someone breaks into your house while you're asleep, by the time you go put in the code and get ur gun out you'll be dead

Erik Arustamyan The Netherlands don't seem to permit gun ownership for self defense (except for notable circumstances I assume), so quick access isn't necessary within the parameters they allow gun ownership. As for my own opinion, it could be worth comparing how many deaths are prevents by gun ownership for self defense vs deaths enabled by less restricted gun access.

andrewia yes but according to the chart at 3:53 the burgalary rate is the highest in the Netherlands, so the chances of you needing to defend yourself at home is also high. Considering the fact that there's only 17mil people in the Netherlands compared to that of 320mil in the USA the Netherlands shouldn't even be near the top of that chart but in almost every chart they show in the video the Netherlands is there, countries like Russia, China and India aren't. We can't just get rid of all guns. It's impossible to do that in the US literally everyone would have to volunteeraly go and give in all of their guns which won't happen, instead we need to create common sense laws. There isn't enough police in America to go around to people's houses every few months to check and see if they have safe storage, instead everything has to be done before the person buys a gun. There needs to be background checks, everyone who buys a gun should be put in a registry, there needs to be a list of medication and mental disorders and if your taking those medications or have the slightest of those disorders you don't get a gun. There also needs to be proper training. It's the same with buying a car. No license no car. You should get a license beforehand and in order to get a license you need to pass a gun safety test.

i’m from the netherlands and guns don’t seem to be needed at all. burglars don’t even have those

+ougbad And if they do, it's a fake gun

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f7t8hqdpu928dac.html

^Crowders vid for the nah sayers^

Crimson King maybe u should watch louder with crowders video you ignorant weeaboo

Same!

Haha that strawman argument video? Just like you morons to argue “per capita” stupid just like your argument for the electoral college! Bullshit grasping at straws to make your invalid point somehow valid! You people are beyond help!

Are you American??

@@harrisonbanon9552 This video is objectively bad for proving its point. It disingenuously provides cherrypicked info in deceptive ways. Colion Noire made a good video on it.

@@bluntcabbage6042 This is not a good example of a video, however, you need to realise there is a problem with guns in America. Fullstop.

@@harrisonbanon9552 I wouldn’t say the problem is with guns, more like the bad people using them.

@@armandotarazon9983 But how come, America, the only first world county to Allow guns so loosely, has such a problem that no other county has?

Yeeees.. This whole video was dismantled. Of course, some will see the high production value and think, "Surely they are telling the truth.. just look at that clipboard and the red highlights!"

Trees all over the world are crying. :(

Remember that it scares the elite that Joe Q Public has access to the same protection their bodyguards have

+TheTitanSlayers kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f7t8hqdpu928dac.html LOUDER WITH CROWDER DEBUNKING THIS BS PROPAGANDA

***** Using facts instead of bullshit propaganda makes you a liar? Don't refute his arguments/statistics with you own argument or statistic ..just call him names. That's the leftist/liberal way!!

+T -Val I'm convinced now lol

Hey Its Smoother if this guy is an idiot you must be super idiot lmao 😂

@@ShibeR6 I like how being patriotic is bad. If you dont like your country you can always move! :)

@@Raiko01 Not really. That's extremely hard to do.

@@Raiko01 I would love to move out the US but guess what not everyone has money to do that

What facts were skewered? Do you mean skewed? I think you mean skewed.

Haha

I noticed that too. very fancy.

+Zero Cool Aunty Donna

Found it, Google "11x17 Clipboard Hardboard with 8" Lever Operated Clip" $20

Amazing. An impactful video about gun violence in the US and you wanna know about the *clipboard.* But thank you Sham3d for sharing that I really fucking loved that clipboard

+Nate Riggs As someone from Germany, I actually cared more about the clipboard than the contents of the video. I already knew everything mentioned here. Those crazy gun laws are one of the major reasons I never want to visit the US. And considering how batshit crazy the Republicans with their hillbilly-base are, I doubt that anything will change anytime soon.

so youre saying that this video is 100% correct

k4sper ski i suggest you watch steven crowders rebuttle video

17njl01 Hell yes

Bradley Johnson thats where youre wrong kiddo

17njl01 When you take two countries like Honduras and Switzerland who have roughly the same amount of people and compare their gun laws to gun crime, it doesn’t fit your narrative. Honduras has some of the strictest gun laws in the world and have the highest gun crime rate. Switzerland is 18th in gun ownership but has one of the fewest gun related crimes in the world. Gun bans don’t work as we’ve seen in Australia and practically all of Europe where fewer guns doesn’t mean less gun crime. And if that is the case, then crimes like stabbings, assault, rape, robbery, etc have skyrocketed. More guns are owned in this country than ever before, so can you explain to me how in the hell is gun crime on a steady decline since concealed carry became legal in more and more states.

You take away the guns you give the government all the power

Oh... like in Mexico? Open your eyes and stop eating all the bullshit the government tells the media to feed you!

+Not Who You Think I Am how does owning a gun mean that the government owns all the power? are you saying that we wouldn't be able to riot if the gov become corrupt or something? this nation is defined by power to the people, we are the ones who make and amend laws. it would be our fault if the country goes to ruin, since no one seems to give a crap anymore, am I wrong?

Not Who You Think I Am guns are a business

Not Who You Think I Am And I ask again. Wouldn't it be our fault, as a nation, if it were to even get that far? We have one of the strongest political systems in the world, (though no one trusts it because of political corruption) WE chose who WE want for President, governor, etc. Paranoid much, you think that would happen again or something? That was in the past. Be honest to yourself. Do you own a gun, and for what reason would you? To protect your family? Recreation or sports? Look how Japan's doing without guns. The point is that with guns involved there will be death. I'm not saying to get rid of it completely, if you could restrict to the point where Japan's at, I'd be satisfied.

explain pls

@@flor473 He wont. Theres only one thing wrong with this video for him, It makes him sad that his babyish addiction to polymer and steel is the problem.

@@volksfolks62 hmm sorry i hurt ur feelings big boy seems like you’ve got everything figured out

+Don Vidal I know, like gravity, chemistry, electromagnetism, electronics, etc.

+nick howell what facts? these "statistics" are completely manipulated and sometimes downright false.

+Jeremy Bacchus Says who? What are your sources?

+jmitterii2 Please use your brain. You are bragging about sciences being on your side of this argument? Please look at the trend line drawn at 6:10 in this video (just for one super-obvious example). It only fits if you ignore more than 25 states. -_- Now try some critical thinking. You know, from that scientific method you were just bragging about?

EmpiricalPragmatist I'm sorry that a trend line drawn in hand isn't a 100% correct, but if you listen to what she says, she says that overall there is a correlation between the number of guns and the amount of people killed, which doesn't sound completely off to me

because you cant walk down to the store and buy a gun at Walmart you do need a license and a reason

Silversnake Productions bullshit. at least here at the Walmarts in Tennessee, I can walk into one and buy a gun for any damn reason I please, license or not, so long as i pass a (non-universal) background check

People are biased. Period.

Because their "facts" are cherry picked data that exclude any data points that disprove their premise. Look up the data on your own. I'll readily admit the US does have a higher gun homicide rate than many western countries, but it's nowhere near what Vox is trying to distort.

thank you at least someone knows there facts.

Yea they kept on contradicting their points, were disingenuous and did TEXTBOOK correlation causation fallacy

Such as?

@@gunhound45 -How they disproportionately compare US to specific developed UN countries' suicide rates instead of comparing US to the highest suicide rates. US isnt even top 30 in suicide rate. -How she pivots multiple points like when she goes from Homicides to all around gun deaths to fit her narrative -How she mentions US has the highest ownership of firearms but completely ignore the US is only 28th in homicide. -How she ignores that homicide has gone down 30%+ from the past few decades -Adds a clip of Obama talking about San Bernardino which had to with terrorism despite making a chart later that had terrorism go in the "Other causes of death" category -Misrepresents the statistic of mass shootings by showing a statistic of incidents that involves shooting rather than death total. Of the random countries she has shown, proportionately US is below some of the developed UN countries she had shown. The reason why the US kill people less is because of the bad guys getting stopped with GUNS. -Tries to convince you that gun laws are bad and tries to perpetrate the narrative of the 2nd amendments being inefficient by adding suicides. As if Guns are the reason people commit suicide. All 33 of the countries ahead of US in suicide rate have controlled gun laws and still kill themselves more. -She goes on to ignore how a country like Australia had a gun ban and was proven that it was ineffective. Because not only were non fire arm suicides happening at a more frequent rate than gun suicides, but it spiked as soon as it was put in place and faced virtually no change to the suicide rate -Compares the homicide rate to other countries not realizing that 4/5 of gun violence are because of drugs. Chicago despite having the highest homicide rate in the U.S. has also one of the most strictest gun laws -Gives a stat where she compares Aids Drugs War and Terrorism to Gun Violence in the US. She fail to realize War and Terrorism also include guns. And instead of picking the most frequent causes of death like Heart Disease and Cancer she adds Aids which isnt even a huge deal in the US anyway. .003% of the US have aids and even a lower % die from it. Yet still has a higher rate than Homicide. Homicide isnt even top 10 in causes of death in the US.(And yes i understand the graphic was designed to show gun deaths in total) -Would sometimes switch between Suicide to Homicide to all around gun deaths. The problem with this is that this also include self defense homicides and justifiable ones. Which is literally exactly why there is a 2nd amendment -Tries to unjustify the gun homicide rate decreasing by comparing it to other countries *This video is just poorly written. Poorly represented. Obviously biased propaganda and is despicable. They knowingly lie to audiences but forget the internet exist where people could expose videos like this so people dont get brainwashed by this anti 2nd amendment trash of an argumentative video. Pathetic*

Surya Das so ur not gunna reply to this man damn man so u were wrong

@@user-em1dl6jk1j You want to get compared with 3rd world countries. No my standard.

@@paxundpeace9970 When did i say that? I just said its important to compare the top ranked countries instead of countries they know have a lower rate

Great job at making a compelling argument. Just deny the facts, I mean what are they going to do? State the facts again? You can just deny the facts given to you again.

@@sandrapark8705 strictest gun laws in Chicago, yet most guns are obtained there illegally. Hmm, the flow of illegal guns is high, and it also seems more crimes are committed by those who aren’t legal obtainers, like the majority of us. HMMMMMM.