The Super Fast Tank vs a Deadly 88mm Trap

  Рет қаралды 73,059

Dark Docs

Dark Docs

3 ай бұрын

June 1942, North Africa: As the sun scorches the endless desert, the British 7th Armoured Brigade, the "Desert Rats," brace for a crucial showdown in Operation Battleaxe. Their secret weapon: the newly minted A15 Crusader, a 20-ton steel predator, ready to blaze across the battlefield at a top speed of 27 miles per hour.
Outfitted with a 2-pounder anti-tank gun and a coaxial Besa machine gun, the Crusader is more than a match for the Italian defenses it's designed to counter. But as the tanks roll out, the reality of war hits hard. Instead of the expected Italian resistance, they come face-to-face with the German 88mm anti-tank guns and a wall of Panzer IIIs and IVs, turning their first combat into a harrowing ambush.
Explosions light up the landscape, sending clouds of sand into the air as shells find their targets. It's a trial by fire for the Crusader, a tank born from the lessons of World War 1 and Britain's strategic vision of armored warfare. Amid gunfire and the relentless desert heat, the Crusaders' fight in Operation Battleaxe becomes a fierce contest for supremacy in North Africa.
-
As images and footage of actual events are not always available, Dark Docs sometimes utilizes similar historical images and footage for dramatic effect. I do my best to keep it as visually accurate as possible. All content on Dark Docs is researched, produced, and presented in historical context for educational purposes. We are history enthusiasts and are not always experts in some areas, so please don't hesitate to reach out to us with corrections, additional information, or new ideas. -

Пікірлер: 138
@maxpayne2574
@maxpayne2574 3 ай бұрын
No nation knew what would be the correct mix of armor, speed and fire power. The British idea of a infantry tank and a fast tank seems good on paper. The total dependability of the Sherman is a very under rated asset. A Tiger with a broken transmission is a very expensive pill box.
@coastlinesailingcruisingan3991
@coastlinesailingcruisingan3991 3 ай бұрын
in all fairness no allied tank at that time could withstand the 88mm gun. especially the M4 with its high profile.
@PhilippBrandAkatosh
@PhilippBrandAkatosh 3 ай бұрын
is that so ? i dont think so as example the M4A3E2 was basically immune to the shorter 88 mm guns
@recoil53
@recoil53 3 ай бұрын
@@PhilippBrandAkatosh Not shipped to Europe until the end of May, 1944.
@THEFINALHAZARD
@THEFINALHAZARD 3 ай бұрын
Not only that, but short 88s weren’t the only thing out there by a long shot-no pun meant
@apyllyon
@apyllyon 3 ай бұрын
@@PhilippBrandAkatosh Over certain threshold of being the distance, but welding and casting that armour did place serious problems, to it´s performance overall, and it´s loading and unloading. Single most crucial aspect of organized warfare is logistics..
@psychobeam99
@psychobeam99 3 ай бұрын
​@@recoil53That and they made very few of them compared to other tanks.
@BonesyTucson
@BonesyTucson 3 ай бұрын
The Ronson, right? One strike and it lights, every time!
@peterfarrell520
@peterfarrell520 3 ай бұрын
wrong. thats was the nickname for the sherman. also called the tommy cooker.
@michaelmazowiecki9195
@michaelmazowiecki9195 3 ай бұрын
Called the Tommi cooker by the Germans
@ThumperLust
@ThumperLust 3 ай бұрын
@@peterfarrell520wrong. It was every tank used by the British in North Africa.
@stephenjones6500
@stephenjones6500 3 ай бұрын
​@@michaelmazowiecki9195Yet officially, Sherman crews had the highest survival rate of any allied tank.
@michaelmazowiecki9195
@michaelmazowiecki9195 3 ай бұрын
@@stephenjones6500 didn't say much for other allied tanks which were mostly British designs. The Sherman was ubiquitous among Western Allies. It was a general purpose tank, not really designed as a tank killer as US doctrine used tank destroyers for that function, unlike the Brits who up armored and up gunned it as the Firefly.
@richardsuggs8108
@richardsuggs8108 3 ай бұрын
Wait. When the USA showed up in North Africa we first had the Lee and Grant tanks. Both were powerful and also had limitations.
@harcovanhees394
@harcovanhees394 3 ай бұрын
True, One visible @10:10
@ThumperLust
@ThumperLust 3 ай бұрын
The M3 and M4A1, powered by the rotary engine, at first was pretty bad. It was a 60 hour tank. That’s how long the engine would last.
@Cbabilon675
@Cbabilon675 3 ай бұрын
The Lee was just the name given to the grant tank because of the leasing of them to britain. In all regards they were the same vehicle😊
@craigs71
@craigs71 3 ай бұрын
I think the British turret was slightly modified to fit the radio set in. @on675
@mauricio-wq5lu
@mauricio-wq5lu 3 ай бұрын
Imagine the heat inside these tanks that the crews dealt with.
@otpyrcralphpierre1742
@otpyrcralphpierre1742 3 ай бұрын
Definitely!
@fastyaveit
@fastyaveit 3 ай бұрын
Naw they just had to wind down the windows
@mauricio-wq5lu
@mauricio-wq5lu 3 ай бұрын
@@fastyaveit Of course, during combat. My kind of weekend.
@fastyaveit
@fastyaveit 3 ай бұрын
@@mauricio-wq5lu 🤣🤣🤣
@HammerJammer81
@HammerJammer81 3 ай бұрын
plenty of videos of the crews using their armor to fry eggs in the sun
@dritzzdarkwood4727
@dritzzdarkwood4727 3 ай бұрын
I'd like to see a video completely dedicated to logistics. How do you even transport and distribute millions of litres of water to soldiers and equipment?
@Neklar
@Neklar 3 ай бұрын
So sad that troops on all sides endured such unreliable machines that'd burn with ease.
@tillytilford2158
@tillytilford2158 2 ай бұрын
I met a North African campaign veteran Crusader crewman some years ago in a Royal British Legion club. Of the Crusader, he said 'it was shite!'.
@johnfrancis2215
@johnfrancis2215 3 ай бұрын
I remember a man I worked with who served in North Africa telling me that every British tank crew should have been given a VC for going up against the gerrys in our garbage tanks
@markrunnalls7215
@markrunnalls7215 3 ай бұрын
Ere we go again n again .. Stop saying British armour was crap.. The the M4 was the ultimate war winner from America. Yeah right OK.. We had what we had and we did what we did and I say really quite well..
@TomasFunes-rt8rd
@TomasFunes-rt8rd 3 ай бұрын
@@markrunnalls7215 "Stop saying British armour was crap.." - even though he's quoting A VETERAN ??!! Duuuude !!
@bulgingbattery2050
@bulgingbattery2050 3 ай бұрын
If a tank explodes after being hit, it means that it's ammunition rack detonated.
@JoeDiGiovanniIV
@JoeDiGiovanniIV 3 ай бұрын
Forreal? Wow. Amazing 😂
@alanwilliams4443
@alanwilliams4443 3 ай бұрын
Or they hit the gas tank. Since gas explodes easier and faster than diesel
@JoeDiGiovanniIV
@JoeDiGiovanniIV 3 ай бұрын
@@alanwilliams4443 gas doesn't explode. It ignites. It would take ammunition going off to actually cause an explosion
@masoncornish6663
@masoncornish6663 3 ай бұрын
@@JoeDiGiovanniIVdepends on the available oxygen. Pressure of the fuel tank and a few other factors but they can detonate, it’s just not likely. Also diesel will explode if you compress its storage vessel fast enough. To be fair so will gasoline to an extent
@paktahn
@paktahn 3 ай бұрын
@@masoncornish6663 wrong gasoline does not explode in open atmosphere it burns you dont get a shock wave from gasoline and tanks dont have enough to even produce a very large fireball gasoline is nowhere near as volatile as most people think its hard to even ignite it with a lit cigarette
@masoncornish6663
@masoncornish6663 3 ай бұрын
Single shot? Oh you mean the T34 😂😂
@TomasFunes-rt8rd
@TomasFunes-rt8rd 3 ай бұрын
2:08 - the Australian made Sentinel !! Just when the narrator talks about deep penetration, voila! - we see the tank BEST EQUIPPED for DP scenes EVER MADE !!!
@Riverking1
@Riverking1 3 ай бұрын
It was a probing tank...
@Thenotfunnyperson
@Thenotfunnyperson 3 ай бұрын
Australia excelled at docking as well as dp.
@TomasFunes-rt8rd
@TomasFunes-rt8rd 3 ай бұрын
@@ThenotfunnypersonAArrgghh !!! I had not heard of the term "docking" since I heard a West Coast Eagles fan abusing fans of the Fremantle Dockers at a football match ten years ago.... Why did you reawaken this suppressed memory...?!
@SunKing968
@SunKing968 Ай бұрын
Thanks for focussing on my favourite tank- and noting the big improvement with the Mk 3 version. If I were a Nazi anti-tank gunner, I would have been incapable of targeting the Crusaders because they're so goddamn SEXY-looking.
@glennosborne4555
@glennosborne4555 3 ай бұрын
So this commentary completely ignores ANZAC troops that were a main part of the forces in Africa. Quality of these videos is diving information wise.
@oneshotme
@oneshotme 3 ай бұрын
I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
@davey7452
@davey7452 3 ай бұрын
The twin 20mm anti aircraft gun version saw combat in Normandy not against the luftwaffe but as an infanry support weapon, firing HE shells it can destroy German bunkers and trench fortifications.
@apyllyon
@apyllyon 3 ай бұрын
a well prepared bunker isn´t structurally knocked down by 20mm shell but if it get´s through the firing embracesure, it´s a turn anything inside into mince meat..
@barto4678
@barto4678 3 ай бұрын
The Pinto of tanks?
@kencook8819
@kencook8819 3 ай бұрын
Yes.
@coastlinesailingcruisingan3991
@coastlinesailingcruisingan3991 3 ай бұрын
that could also be said of the Sherman's in the desert. easily knocked out by 88mm guns and Mk 4 Panzer tanks. the Germans nick named the M4 Sherman "Tommy cookers " Tommy being a British solider. this was because the occupants were literally cooked alive. my Grandad was their in the 8th army.
@confederatenationalist7283
@confederatenationalist7283 3 ай бұрын
My dad served in the REME in WW2 in Italy.He was employed in recovery of damaged tanks and by the limited amount of what he would ever say about it and what I found out for myself I knew that I would never want to serve in tanks. Just spalling alone could cause horrific wounds and casualties and it's impossible to climb out of a tank with broken damaged limbs.The resulting damage inside the tank then often igniting the usual awful tank fire. I think they would often load up knocked out tanks and then remove the remains of the casualties at the field workshops.The Germans don't seem to have referenced as much vulnerability with their vehicles but I can believe claims that tankers would prefer to end it with a side arm than to sit trapped in a burning tank. I'd prefer manning a gun in the artillery. ​@@coastlinesailingcruisingan3991
@brennanleadbetter9708
@brennanleadbetter9708 3 ай бұрын
Big fires were due to the ammunition exploding.
@mohammedsaysrashid3587
@mohammedsaysrashid3587 3 ай бұрын
It was an informative and wonderful explanation and military evaluation video about British designed Crusade tanks... which was preferred speed and faster maneuverability upon firepowers and armored thickness ....had two upgraded versions. Thank you ( Dark Docs) channel for sharing
@paktahn
@paktahn 3 ай бұрын
they pay you to post comments like this or are you that stupid? the dark channels are always full of factual errors
@stonefox9124
@stonefox9124 3 ай бұрын
Fun fact. The light saber was modled after the 88...
@zaynevanday142
@zaynevanday142 3 ай бұрын
All tanks can blow up with a single shot 😂😂😂
@t5ruxlee210
@t5ruxlee210 3 ай бұрын
The best items on the British side were probably the captured huge hoard of Krupp armour piercing shells the Italian Army had accumulated at Tobruk. A British officer experimented with assorted modified driving bands until he discovered a setup that let Krupp shells work in the guns on some British tanks in addition to capured Italian artillery. Since the British shells were always very scarce early on, this was a huge "own goal" advantage when first fighting Italian forces.
@johnfisk811
@johnfisk811 3 ай бұрын
These were fitted into French 75mm artillery cases captured in Syria and taken to Egypt and mated together to make better AP rounds than the poor US ones for the new Grant tanks coming into action.
@Cbabilon675
@Cbabilon675 3 ай бұрын
One thing that is left out a lot is that the Crusader tank had issues with their air intake getting clogged up by the Sands of Africa.
@davidhobson7652
@davidhobson7652 3 ай бұрын
Holy crap that's alot of Australian Sentinal mkI cruiser tanks at 2minutes23second to bad they never fought in war
@ridethecurve55
@ridethecurve55 3 ай бұрын
Wow! A 2 pounder. That'll show Fritz! They could have saved alot of money with Jeeps carrying a pile of rocks and sticks for ammo.
@kylek29
@kylek29 3 ай бұрын
T-72: "Now that's a feature I want .. "
@evilfingers4302
@evilfingers4302 3 ай бұрын
There's no such thing as an Indestructible Tank.
@coastlinesailingcruisingan3991
@coastlinesailingcruisingan3991 3 ай бұрын
the British challenger 3 is the closest to it so far as the Grateful Ukrainians are finding out with their British Challenger 2's
@evilfingers4302
@evilfingers4302 3 ай бұрын
@@coastlinesailingcruisingan3991 so how do you account for the Challenger 2 that was destroyed by the Russians in Ukraine? Also keep in mind, the Ukrainians only have 14 Challenger 2s at their disposal compared to 400 in total of Leopard 1s and 2s.
@jamesocker5235
@jamesocker5235 3 ай бұрын
Lots of Australian sentinal footage
@drmarkintexas-400
@drmarkintexas-400 3 ай бұрын
🎖️🤗🙏💙🏆 Thank you for sharing
@teamgonzo9289
@teamgonzo9289 3 ай бұрын
Armored "Rat Patrol"!👍
@thomaslinton5765
@thomaslinton5765 3 ай бұрын
How could encountering Germans be a surprise when the were trying to reverse a German/Italian offensive?
@duncan6406
@duncan6406 3 ай бұрын
It’s not but the British inter deuce the Sherman on the battle field (200 pieces )well before the Americans came in to the battle scene.
@HarshmanHills
@HarshmanHills 3 ай бұрын
And now Russian tanks are the modern equivalent
@brennanleadbetter9708
@brennanleadbetter9708 3 ай бұрын
Any tank explodes when you hit it in the right area.
@bwilliams463
@bwilliams463 3 ай бұрын
That's kind of a silly title; ANY tank could blow up with one hit, if the circumstances were right. Shermans were (possibly unfairly) infamous for it.
@brennanleadbetter9708
@brennanleadbetter9708 3 ай бұрын
It was poor ammo storage that resulted in that.
@auro1986
@auro1986 3 ай бұрын
you should have made more and give it your army also
@iainburgess8577
@iainburgess8577 3 ай бұрын
Isn't Challenger descended from Crusader?
@admiralduck5591
@admiralduck5591 3 ай бұрын
Not exactly, challenger came after chieftain which itself replaced centurion which was the first MBT or universal tank.
@Spartan902
@Spartan902 3 ай бұрын
It was all experimentation at that time. Learnt by mistakes and started again or got it reasonably right the first time and built on that. War is hell but desert war must of been pure hell! The Brits couldn't get it quite right as far as Tanks go.
@glynluff2595
@glynluff2595 3 ай бұрын
But mainly to our own forces! The models provided for ‘Joe’ were noticeably better finished and it was commented on by management. There was a very high Communist engagement in the British work force. This faded quickly post war when people came to a different view. The other problem for tanks in the desert was that many of the regiments were ex cavalry only recently wedded to mechanised warfare and made many mistakes which are recorded in the histories. The other problem was the form of construction was bolt and rivet which disintegrated upon hit. Welded construction was later used which,improved resistance to impact.
@scoobadooba97
@scoobadooba97 3 ай бұрын
Basically another sherman
@zillsburyy1
@zillsburyy1 3 ай бұрын
the ronson
@coastlinesailingcruisingan3991
@coastlinesailingcruisingan3991 3 ай бұрын
that was the nickname of the M4 Sherman.
@Boric78
@Boric78 3 ай бұрын
I doubt the Crusader ever met the Tiger. They made so few and only a handful made it to Africa, so it probably didn't happen. The Sherman met them, because there were thousands of Shermans. Thats a credit to American Industry not to the Tigers ability. The Tiger was so rare it was a ghost. And probably too much of a gas guzzling, mechanic magnet arse to be loved by any commander. There is a reason no high ranking German ever calls out in praise of the Tiger, despite their post war lies, because they hated it and recognised it for what it was.
@mrjockt
@mrjockt 3 ай бұрын
It’s believed that about 35 Tiger I’s were sent to North Africa, at least one was captured intact by the British, Tiger 131 currently on show at the Bovington Tank Museum.
@miketrusky476
@miketrusky476 3 ай бұрын
From the Tiger Manuel, "tracks must be checked and serviced every 75km. The Vl was a better bet as a battle winner, Ego was a German TRAIT, that cost them many German lives.
@mrjockt
@mrjockt 3 ай бұрын
I wonder how Allied tank development might have gone if the Germans had never fielded the Tiger, many of the advancements made later in the war were in response to the Tiger i.e. the equipping of the T-34 with the 85mm gun, the development of the IS series, the British equipping tanks with the 17pdr. etc.
@misolgit69
@misolgit69 3 ай бұрын
at 2.10 that's a column of French tanks
@Boric78
@Boric78 3 ай бұрын
@@mrjockt The one from Fury. Taken out by a Churchill, which kind of proves the point.
@annehersey9895
@annehersey9895 3 ай бұрын
Even the Sherman and the venerable T34 even with its 85 upgraded gun was no match for the Tigers and Panzer 4 n 5. The Soviets by the battle of Kursk had all but stopped frontal attacks and tried as hard as possible to go for the sides where the armor wasn’t as thick!
@daystatesniper01
@daystatesniper01 3 ай бұрын
You can't polish a turd the crusader was crap with a capital K in a fighting role
@pcka12
@pcka12 3 ай бұрын
A little 20 ton tank versus an anti aircraft gun (note British AA guns were more powerful than 88s)? What outcome do you expect?
@JohnnyAFG81
@JohnnyAFG81 3 ай бұрын
British tanks mirrored British automobiles, poor build quality.
@JackAllofit
@JackAllofit 3 ай бұрын
Rolls royce, aston martin, land rover and austin would like a word please
@J.B.29
@J.B.29 3 ай бұрын
What would a 2 pounder be in millimeters?
@lot2196
@lot2196 3 ай бұрын
​@@JackAllofitall junk
@mrjockt
@mrjockt 3 ай бұрын
@@J.B.2940mm, the 6pdr. was 57mm and the 17pdr. was 76.2mm.
@J.B.29
@J.B.29 3 ай бұрын
@@mrjockt thanks
@richardseys8014
@richardseys8014 3 ай бұрын
sad
@FrankOdonnell-ej3hd
@FrankOdonnell-ej3hd 3 ай бұрын
⚛😀
@davewilson9738
@davewilson9738 3 ай бұрын
Got the contract, didn't come through with the goods...like the PPE scandal recently!
@davymckeown4577
@davymckeown4577 3 ай бұрын
The only WW2 tank which stood a chance of surviving a direct hit from an 88mm was the Russian KV1&2, and that depended on the range and where the round impacted. The Centurion would have been more than a match for the Tiger but arrived too late to be of much use.
@jackburton9035
@jackburton9035 3 ай бұрын
Poor video, didn’t list off every tank ever.
@peghead
@peghead 3 ай бұрын
Typical Dark Docs practice, talk about the Pz III, show footage of King Tiger, Stug, lazy editing.
Most underrated British WW2 Tank? @thetankmuseum
11:22
Military History not Visualized
Рет қаралды 163 М.
What Causes Vibration Issues on American Fast Battleships With @Drachinifel
22:46
格斗裁判暴力执法!#fighting #shorts
00:15
武林之巅
Рет қаралды 85 МЛН
Miracle Doctor Saves Blind Girl ❤️
00:59
Alan Chikin Chow
Рет қаралды 38 МЛН
America's Most Feared Panzer Killer
16:01
Dark Docs
Рет қаралды 970 М.
The Most Effective US Artillery in History
11:02
Dark Docs
Рет қаралды 454 М.
Life inside a M4 Sherman (Cross Section)
12:40
Simple History
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
The Multi-Gun Beast that Saved Marines from Total Annihilation
13:41
The Most Brutal Underwater Weapon of WW2
12:56
Dark Docs
Рет қаралды 454 М.
The 7 WWII Land Vehicles with Highest Kill-to-Loss Ratios
9:18
Useless Overweight Tanks of WW2
10:21
Simple History
Рет қаралды 435 М.
The Nazi's Deadliest Weapon is Still Being Used Today
13:06
Dark Docs
Рет қаралды 672 М.