Evidence of manipulation and engineering is ignored.

Surely these pair of sexes 'colluded' to have collapsed its chromosomes yet likely believe why fork at ape's?!

Our pleasure! Thank you for watching from Sweden.

I agree, finding good scientific creation info is hard

The 98% gap between chimp and human DNA as proclaimed by neo-Darwinists is just an optical illusion. If you express the difference by the number of nucleotides, the gap between chimps and humans would be much higher. Besides if you google and look at an actual photo of a chimpanzee then the magic behind that numbers manipulation suddenly disappears LOL. A similar scenario happens when supermarket owners price their goods. If the item's MSRP is supposed to be $20 then they tag it as $19.99 to make it more sellable.

Best in starting to go strait to where accidental lifes "rubber must meet the road" for ANY traction period in "origins" Just allow for the perfect atomic structure of the material plane brought into time and space from "somewhere" as Hubble discovered...! Then "life" according to the Globalist owned Ed. systems must have began ~ "by itself in an ancient sea" This was addressed extensively in depth by Sir Frederick Hoyle: this research you should read thru; DNA discussions with so called 'Evil-Lucien-ists' waaay jumps the gun when this mindset discusses Space travel when they have yet to invent flights origin = this is allowing them place when they have no place for they've no way to get there so call them on it...! Of course you must know of Michael Denton and myriads of others clear assessments of the complexity's of any living thing things...! Once the reality of super mega suffisticated DNA existed and was understood to be the required orchestrator of any life ignoring the 1st & 2nd Laws of Thermodynamics with Rule of Entropy = IT WAS OVER right then since Crick N Miller Like any great con job crooks at the top running and substidizing the scam never give up the con and this is Satanic with the only result IS Atheist MarXism/Communism's tyrannical PolitBuro Ending in their UN Agenda 21 + 2030 - NWO + OWG setup by the WEF/WHO's digital Great Reset and ~ "The Mark"

Why do you write: And it turns out to be the fusion site. As if they had other evidence that already identified the fusion site, and this is the final proof? No, the search for telomeres within the chromosomes, that would suggest this particular sequence was once the end of a chromosome, only gives them one likely candidate, and that is the site in Chromosome 2. In other words, the sequence found, is the only evidence of it being a fusion site, there are not other evidence. Now there are only 4 basepairs, and a telomere is characterized by a certain sequence of these basepairs, and other parts of the DNA, being billions of basepairs long, can have basepairing that statistically resembles telomere sequences. After they identified this site, as a potential site for 2 chromosomes melting together. They look for the crossing point in the DNA. If a chromosome is an X, there is a place where the 2 lines come together yes? This place is called a centromer. The place where the lines meet in the X, does not have genes, it is called structural DNA, because it is used when cells divide. Right, if the Chromosomes have fused, one X has fused to another X, by the end of the lines, they are now stuck, and there would be 2 places, where the lines meet. 2 Xes standing on top of each other so to speak, and 2 places where the lines come together, 2 centromeres in other words. One has then theoretically dissolved, and there is one centromere left and some extra long arms. They think they have identified that spot, but as is argued here, the proposed fossilised centromere, is only 41000 basepairs long, and a centromere is 250000 basepairs long, but more importantly, this sequence is a part of a gene, and so can never have been a centromere. So I don't quite understand your predicament, you are asking; when there is only 1 place where this might have happened, how do we answer those that say it has? You are assuming that they are right. You have basically just been explained, that they seem to be wrong, that their assumptions, have not been verified. Thus, the only likely candidate sequence for chromosome fusion, was a disappointment.

Better late than never! Glad you're here.

@@icrscience thanks! 😊

@@icrscience Hey! Thank you for all your work. Can Dr. Tomkins please respond to this argument being circulated by the evolutionary community: "When a BLAST report is run on internal telomeric sequences (forwards and backwards), we find hits all throughout the entire genome (as Dr. Tomkins has pointed out), but the fusion site is the only location where we find the entire head-to-head telomeric DNA sequences with the telomeric calling cards in both forwards and backwards." If this is the case, what is the best response? Thank you! God bless.

@ related to chimps... Maybe the human wasn't really in love just in heat

@ Im mistaken the word CLAIM escaped my attention

@ but to. be serious isn't there a failsafe to avoid contamination?

No, splitting it would not leave two functional chromosomes, since the vestigial centromere is degraded by virtue of its roughly five to seven million years of being a proverbial "fifth wheel". It is non-functional, full stop. The paltry rudimentary genetic function which Tomkins crows about in his creationist publication record is not convincing to anyone outside of ICR. This is just an effort to keep the wool over the eyes of this flock. Go to BioLogos for actual information about such matter from Christians who happen to be qualified scientists. Tomkins is doing YEC apologetics with a veneer of scientific language, and that is all.

​@@AnthroJoe you say: degraded by virtue of its roughly five to seven million years of being a proverbial "fifth wheel" on the contrary, there is NO degraded centromere there to begin with. even if we grant superfast "degradation" of a non-functional piece of genome (which is infinitely much slower than say, a specifically disadvantageous piece of genome), we should have left with something more than alphoid sequences as a remnant - which as it happens, are often not associated with centromeres but are present throughout the genome. what's more, the alphoid sequences in question "are diverse, form three separate sub-groups in alignment analyses, and do not cluster with known functional human centromeric alphoid elements" overall, surprisingly little "evidence" for fusion. and as for the "paltry rudimentary genetic function" statement, it screams of prejudice and salt, im afraid.

The fusion never happened and here's why. If that fusion took place who would that first human procreate with. We would need 2 events giving opposite sexes at the same place and time. That would be a miracle. That so called fusion point is so degraded I almost can't believe scientists adhere to the theory of a fusion point. God bless That fusion point overlaps a gene responsible for development in the womb.

In 2006, Dover vs. Kitzmiller. Creationists tried and failed to get yhwh into schools.

@@yeshuaisjoshua the first time they tried to introduce evolution they failed to get it into schools as well. Creation was included in public education for the majority of this nation's history and the U.S. rose to the postiton of being the leading nation in the world. If it was being taught before it can happen again.

@refuse2bdcvd324 The only way creationism is put into schools is if the US doesn't exist anymore. Then yhwh will be taught and America becomes a dumb nation.

Because Science that doesn't support God's word is wrong and will instead destroy actual functional systems of science.

You still around? LOL you really like putting your foot in your mouth. "masses of proper scientific information"? Lets see some then. I'll wait.

The Bible îs the Word of God. If scientific data seem to contradict it, sooner or later it will be proven wrong. God made all chromosomes, al DNA, all the organelles of the cell.We humans cannot make the smallest useful protein and we lecture Him about chromosomes and find errors in His Word! We should better read His Word and learn from IT, and then speak

@@farcovidiu3110 You clearly don't have the faintest idea what you are talking about!!

@@twosheds1749 I am a doctor and I work with vaccines. Some of them are proteins obtained through genetic engineering. I should have been clearer and said that in experiments like that of Miller and Urey a few amino acids were obtained, and in later attempts like that of Prof. L. Cronin, branched products with few peptide bonds were obtained, rightfully called biological garbage by Prof Tour (not to mention homochirality which is necessary for life). So we are truly far behind the Creator concerning proteins, as I have mentioned. As for the Bible ,there is no place here for the hard issues, which seem to contradict some scientific data (of course these issues also could be addressed), but instead I would like to mention something truly important about this book. It makes some interesting statements that are worth considering. For example, it is written in John 3:16 that God so loved the world, that gave his only Son, so that whoever believe in him may have eternal life. If this is true, this is what we lose by arguing against the Bible. I pray that you and many others will consider this offer that the Bible makes.

Address the arguments. The “other side” sells books and makes videos too. Charles Darwin wrote a book, what does that prove? Did Darwin posit his theory to write books for money? Yeah, you’re a hypocrite.

@@sliglusamelius8578 But Darwin didn't use video clips to sell his books. Don't trust people who pretend to be christians and want to sell you something.

@@georg7120 Darwin sold something. Don’t trust him. There were no KZfaq videos in Darwin’s day, good gravy you’re making atheists look even stupider that I already think they are.

The amount of info given here, for free, is sufficient. If you want more, purchase the research.

Look up 'evidence for a young earth' and also 'evidence for a young universe'

What can your science tell us about how the moon formed?

Nothing cant create anything from nothing.

It did not.

@@AnthroJoe When did science confirm the bodily resurrection of Jesus?

The Bible should be taken literally and only figuratively when the verse forces us into that interpretation. People such as yourself who claim to be Christian and yet compromise their faith in order to fit in to the world are leading people astray. One day you may wake up and realize it. That you have been on a dark path leading to emptiness and have been trying to lead others down that same path. Wake up! Stop trying to be a friend of the world and a friend of God because it does not work that way. Either you love one and hate the other or vise versa. God's word is clear.

The only reason people are losing trust in the church is because people like you keep trying to push evolution. Thank God for channels like ICR who are helping us understand the truth of the bible in all regards. People such as yourself fail to realize that the devil is the god of this world and as such is leading many people away from God. You should humble yourself before God instead of fighting him. Your pride will only lead you to destruction.

Judging by your channel I would say that you are an atheist. What would make you think you can interpret the bible better than christians? The bible is for us. Given by God to His people to be interpreted through the guidance and wisdom of the Holy Spirit. An atheist does not have the Spirit of God and therefore cannot properly interpret its message.

".... feel the ompulsion to twist the facts to fit your false narrative..." Oh the hypocrisy in that statement.

If you lose trust in the church don't blame ministries like ICR. Look at the rebellion in your own heart.