Ryan Hodges amen

@Joshua Nelson You'll kneel alright, just wait and be patient. Denying God won't stop him from removing the unbelievers.

🙏 🙏 🙌🙌🙌🙌

@Joshua Nelson the Bible says every knee shall bow, and every tongue confess, that Jesus Christ, is Lord.....you just need to figure out when you will do that....in this world, for salvation, or the next, for judgement....

@Joshua Nelson bruh moment, if u don’t believe that’s fine lol, just respect tho ✊

Shame Carter talks nonsense huh?

What did he mean when he said that his changing hair color and his skin color is a "broken gene" ?

@@christislife9738 recessive genes

@@georgebond7777 not exactly, here's what he meant made clear in this 6-min video: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rJ9xq9R92LHRfXU.html

Yes when Evolutionists talk about evolution no one understands them... i think that's the idea behind it.. a case of leave it to us we are smart and your too dumb to understand... it works very well for them.. But it's babble smoke and mirrors.

@@christislife9738 mutations, lost information. I think the first human beings had reddish skin. Because first how the world was before the flood (ice shield, canopy). Second the hebrew meaning of Adam: www.abarim-publications.com/Meaning/Adam.html#.XtgGNOprk0M

The verse "professing themselves to be wise they became willingly ignorant", comes to mind. They've denied the creation, the flood and the coming ressurection.

Make an effort to share this knowledge with as many people as possible and for sure at least you can save a soul.

Why aren’t apes becoming human today, why do apes always produce apes NO exceptions. Evolutionists never give any examples of one kind of animal turning into another kind.

@@mickhealy572 - *Change* is not in question since every living organism has the ability to adapt; it is observable. What we *DO NOT SEE* is organisms changing so much that they can no longer breed or be bred with other members of their species.

freemind - thank you.

They will say, only one section of the ape family evolved, the rest of the species stayed apes.

Mick Healy , you preempt the real meaning of observable change with your arbitrary, 'a priori' interpretive theory. Scientifically reasonable theory is wholly contingent upon, respectful of and FOLLOWS what the evidentiary facts state, because the honest observer's working premise is that 'truth' inheres in the facts and is, therefore, not susceptible or amenable to whatever may be independently imagined about it. It is an objective 'truth' which is beyond question, but your subjective "reasoning" in its regard is EVER-questionable!

Squeaky Knee Skateboarding meh

@@nunyabisnass1141 Your brilliance here truly inspires. Rarely, if ever, is one treated to such glorious spectacle. I shall never forget the day within which, upon us all, your magnanimous response shone ever so brightly and truly changed the way which we all think. I doff my cap to you, dear sir. Not.

@@mrfuriouser you're welcome.

@Squeaky Knee Skateboarding.....Do you remember what started the shift in your thinking...to change from believing in evolution to creation? Were there any books or videos that you watched that really got you thinking? The reason I ask is that I'm dealing with a person who did believe in the Biblical Creation, but in the last couple of years started doing research on Science/evolution, and he now believes in evolution. 😔 I'm curious about your journey and what exactly made an impact on your thinking to change your mind. God bless you!

@@d.h.1691 *School curricula are determined* by an ATHEISTIC group with an *admitted* PRIME COMMITMENT to naturalistic explanations that *DO NOT ALLOW A DIVINE FOOT IN THE DOOR.* ... If a specific group has a preeminent commitment to explanations that disprove divine design, *should not the conclusions of that group be scrutinized more rigidly than ever due to their admitted bias?* Yet most of the world accepts blindly the *ASSUMPTIONS and INFERENCES* of anyone in a lab-coat! We must recognize that Atheistic Scientists have cobbled together a narrative for creation and existence that bears no resemblance to reality.. and they have done so WITHOUT EVIDENCE!! Naturalistic scientists have adopted an A-Priori (theoretical) method which *allows them to make claims that have not been substantiated by the SCIENTIFIC METHOD of OBSERVATION and EXPERIMENT.* It is pseudoscience... and it has an agenda. If you demand *empirical proof* of Earth by Accretion, of magma inside the Earth instead of water, of all the varied minerals of the Earth forming from a melted state instead of crystallizing out of water, of true speciation, of geological Deep Time, etc... *THERE IS NONE..!!! It is not science. It is science FICTION.*

I love your comment! Peace and grace - from Belgrade, Serbia.

@@sasajevremovic7901 Thank you. From my heart The Lord our God be with you. Seeing everything going on and what The Lord says about these days truly we'll meet soon when HE comes to take us home to our FATHER in heaven. See you then. From North Carolina USA. P.S. I visited the city of Split in 1979 while in the U.S. Navy. I took a picture of some children (9-10 years old) at a park playing soccer. I still look at that picture to this day and wonder what ever became of them.

@@billperez1141, yes, Amen! Praise Jesus! Your comment is truth, ONE RACE, mankind, and many ethnicities. That’s the beauty of creation, that we’re all a smorgasbord of God’s glory across the earth. And, when you harm another of mankind, you’re doing that harm to another of man who was created in God’s image, so what act you perpetrate against them, it’s as if committing that act against God, because we’re all made in God’s image. May Jesus bless and keep you my dear brother in Christ.😊🙏🏻❤️

Nothing was demonstrated though

@@dav1djac0b try watching the video this time. smh

@@TKO67 what was demonstrated? DNA doesn’t even exist. This isn’t science or biblical.

@@mickhealy572 I note that you immediately default to a personal attack without even addressing the substance of this post.

@@mickhealy572 - Not true. The natural sciences have been built on a foundation of inference and consensus rather than empirical evidence.. and "scientists" are wrong about a great many things. I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but the "truthful education" you received... WASN'T.

@@mickhealy572 - What did you call me??

@@mickhealy572 obviously i should have read more comments before i replied to your other one...you're not so polite after all...but it would be nice to have some polite debate without the name calling...we're adults aren't we ? there is some potentially really good discussion here...we could try that....we may never agree but we can still behave well in our disagreement. Christian love to all Gilly wife of Mark

@@GodSpeedMcKee1717 - A good description. I would add that no one has EVER OBSERVED a mutation to ADD INFORMATION that could lead to the creation of a new species WITHOUT the ability to breed or be bred with other members of their ancestral lineage.

St. Thomas

This 6-min video makes it clear: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rJ9xq9R92LHRfXU.html

Mutation?

Today there are already 6,000 genetic diseases due to mutations and many people die because of such.

@@danminer5343 thank you for answering my questions. Very kind of you.

@@gordonstowers3167 You are welcome

C'mon. Why use a small word when a big one will do?

The rib fact is so interesting. I googled it and read a little bit so far, but I'm definitely going back for more info. That fact seems like it should be more commonly known, and shared. It's so interesting that The Bible named the rib as the body part used for Eve's creation. It's one of those facts that seemed Random at best, and the opposition might say baseless to Biology. But to see how specific and intentional that was, is another reason for us to try to Understand the Bible, rather than discredit it at the very first scientific analysis. I love how science is providing ways for us to see the truth. Thank you for posting! I'll try to spread the word too. .

It was live in YT before it was listed in YT. I watched it live. Im not the one that disliked by the way. Im just explaining how it may have got that assessment.

George Bond actually when I saw it, it wasn’t live for another 16 hours so I said that. I could be wrong but it’s highly likely some idiot dismissed it without watching. Typical 😂

@@phearlesspharaoh3697 Those were obviously atheist 😅🤣🤣

Same thing I do to CNN.

The snake was possessed by Satan.

​@@danminer5343​ A snake possessed by Satan? Do you find that credible?

@@josephscala6707 - Satan is a fallen Angel. We don't know what powers he has or how he could talk through a serpent. We don't even know what kind of a serpent was used if if the talk was verbal or mental. We do know that it happened. The Bible has turned out to be the most accurate book ever written. However, in English use only what they call the King James Bible, as all modern revised versions have been corrupted.

@@danminer5343 The Bible the most accurate book ever written? At least high school text books can be proven. We can't prove that people lived past 900 years, turned to salt or had strength in their hair - those things cannot be said to be accurate and are against common sense.

@@stevendelucas6311 Archeologists today use the Bible to enable them to interpret what they find. We know now that mankind is adding around 100 new mutations to our mutational load each generation. This shows that the further back in time you go the more complete our DNA was. God created Adam and Eve perfect with no mutational load and with up to 14 million places in our DNA where heterozygocity could exist to enable cause each descendant to have a different amount of each part or system so that nobody would look alike except for identical twins. After Adam sinned God withheld some of His sustaining power and mutations then started occurring preventing them from living forever. As our mutational load kept increasing our health kept decreasing which is why we need doctors more and more each generation. You greatly underestimate the power of our Almighty God who created the entire universe and designed every kind of organism and wrote their DNA code. It was easy for God to give Sampson incredible strength if Sampson obeyed God and did not cut his hair. The hair did not give Sampson strength, but it was God who said that Sampson would receive that strength as long as he obeyed God by not cutting his hair. School textbooks are full of lies about history and about origins. I can easily show the fraud and deception in EVERY one of the hundreds of statements they use to promote the silly story of evolutionism. Lies based upon fraud and deception is not evidence against reality. I use common sense and find the answers using proven scientific facts.

There was no global flood.

@@ozowen Your head is devoid of the facts

Early days of this broadcast...standby for many more lol. Christian love to all Gilly wife of Mark

Proof that is poorly argued does disservice to the truth... These guys are not adept at 'ad hoc' discussion, and should be following a well-reasoned script instead!

Do sensible research. Go to credible sources. Ask questions, look up answers. Do not believe something because it suits you or it appeals to stuff you already believe. Go to folks who know because they have studied, who have spent years experimenting and testing their models. Not someone you heard on the internet who had a great idea that academia rejects

@@ozowen lol that’s the thing every time you tell a Christian to do this they go directly to the Bible to see if it supports their claim. They’re hopeless

Do you have red hair Christine....come on ...out with it! when I was younger I wished I had red hair ....and science gave me hair dye...which to me proves there is a GOD . Christian love to all Gilly wife of Mark

Please don't think i'm being rude here...i'm really not...just your statement...ginger discrimination will not be tolerated...love it....and obviously I don't believe in GOD just because of hair dye lol. Christian love to all Gilly wife of Mark

I don't think the DNA story is as straightforward as you seem to think.

I think they mean the evolution of man taking millions of years. But even a few hundred thousand years would doom man because of mutations. Therefore the culmination of mutations over a supposed evolutionary timescale of producing man would kill off any evolutionary results. This would be the same for any life with that many mutations.

He's referring to the hominid evolution the supposed ancestors go back millions of years.

@@georgebond7777 & Paul Trigg Okay, I get it now. Thanks.

Thomas Dykstra - It's a good question given that we use the same argument against radiometric dating.. I would say that all we have to go on is the *observed* mutation rate, and if that were the end of it, we would be in a stalemate. However, this is just one of many evidences of the Genesis account of Creation and of Noah's Flood being both real and accurate. It all becomes mutually confirming. In the end, if the world was created in and of water instead of by Accretion into a sphere of magma, I can accept the rest on faith. Likewise, if the Global Flood was a real event, then we can accept the unanswered minutia, and discuss it ad nauseam... but we move forward with faith in a loving God who made literally everything for a purpose.. including us.

@@freemind.. , would you be willing to interact thoughtfully about the relation between faith and reason? If you would, I would greatly appreciate your help in distinguishing the two from each other...

@@thomasdykstra100 I'd be happy to. I've occupied a seat at both sides of the table, and I'm happy to discuss what planted me in each of them.

Who is "we"? How are "we" mislead. Can you add some substance to your comment?