Thank you!

@@ruthortega5822 You might want another source. This one was fine until it equated Joseph, Jacob and Rachel's son (1800-1700 B.C.) with Joseph the husband of Jesus (~50 B.C. to 15 A.D.). This author does not even know the Bible's basic story line.

Yes, this is just one of those junk videos that is computer generated.

Yes he is According to Matthew 1:16 "Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary"

Clearly different Jacob to the one who is the father Joseph, who was sold to slavery in Egypt. Also the pictures, many of which very inappropriate and confusing. In one Mary with beard, looking like man? Coming from Egypt, two infants? Very disappointing. Probably work by AI.

Yes, very confusing. Matthew says that Jacob begets Joseph, the husband of Mary, but that's clearly different Jacob, not father of Joseph sold to slavery in Egypt. Also the pictures are often very inappropriate, I'd say insulting even. Mary with beard? Two infants on the picture when talking about the coming back from Egypt? Probably the work of AI. Very disappointing. The citing from the New Testament is correct, but it then it straddles to Old Testament Joseph.... what a mess

This is an issue someone who has knowledge of the scriptures but never studied them. How will someone be paralleling the two different Josephs.

According to Matthew 1:16 "Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary"

The narrator is probably also an artificial voice, as no priest, deacon, reader, or any other self-respecting Catholic would so calmly read such stuff!

There are parallels

I guess Satan has introduced confusion in this story as well as dumbsizing listeners of this , I call falls truth. That is if one be influenced by this falls truth. God bless those whom see lies and proclaim these lies publicly.❤ Thank you for your discernment .

According to Matthew 1:16 "Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary"

@@DF-fo9bh Sorry, there are no parallels. The first Joseph's life foreshadowed Jesus, not Joseph the husband of Mary. Joseph in Genesis was even called "Zaphenath-Paneah" (Savior). Joseph was "dead" then found to be alive at the right hand of power. He then saved his family from certain death. It foreshadows the salvation we receive in Jesus.

@@justcause0909 Different Jacob, my friend. Check the genealogy and you will see another Jacob, the son of Isaac and the father of Judah - Joseph's brother. Read Genesis 30 to the end of Genesis. You might want another source. This one was fine until it equated Joseph, Jacob and Rachel's son (1800-1700 B.C.) with Joseph the husband of Jesus (~50 B.C. to 15 A.D.). This author does not even know the Bible's basic story line.

I'm also confused.....

I think Joseph the dreamer is one of the 12 sons of Jacob & Rachel. The other Joseph was the poster father of Jesus. They have different timeline...

⁠I don’t this is Joseph earthly father of Jesus. Just my opinion

I got confused about the two Josephs.

I am also confused about two Josephs names

St.Joseph pray for me I am already 88 years old Stay close to me as you were with Mary.Mother of Jesus.Amen.mkantony Amen

Different Jacob, my friend. Check the genealogy and you will see another Jacob, the son of Isaac and the father of Judah - Joseph's brother. You might want another source. This one was fine until it equated Joseph, Jacob and Rachel's son (1800-1700 B.C.) with Joseph the husband of Jesus (~50 B.C. to 15 A.D.). This author does not even know the Bible's basic story line.

There are different Joseph's being combined here. The Joseph of Egypt is not the Joseph, Jesus earthly father. One lived centuries before the other. One, a ruler, the other, a carpenter.

Yes the narrator mix up 2 Joseph❣️ Joseph the Dreamer and Joseph husband of Mary, the Foster Father of Jesus Christ! St. Joseph husband of Mary is our Family Patron, pass on from our Forefathers ...

Well over a millennia apart!

The importance of synchronizing the Bible and Egyptian history correctly cannot be overemphasized. It is a primary tenet of biblical apologetics, as is shown by unbelievers who use secular archaeology dates to claim that the Bible is wrong, thereby undermining biblical veracity. If our Bible is not authoritative, we have nothing on which to base our faith.

There is a specific crossover point between the timelines when Pharaoh Necho II on his first military campaign slays King Josiah in 609 B.C. Jehoahaz son of Josiah then became king. In the same year, Necho took Jehoahaz’ brother Eliakim and made him king instead, and renamed him Jehoiakim. (for the biblical account of all this, see 2 Kings 23:29-35; also 2 Kings 24) “Tel Megiddo.” In a second very close crossover, Pharaoh Necho met Nebuchadnezzar at Carchemish in the fourth year of Jehoiakim in the year 605 B.C. Therefore there are two Egyptian/biblical synchronizations close together in 609 and 605 B.C. So, where is your biblical proof to the contrary? The irrefutable word tells me that in 609 B.C. when Necho II kills Josiah. (see: Jeremiah 46:2) This makes a divergence of over if not as little of 550yrs!

According to Matthew 1:16 "Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary"

@@justcause0909 You keep making the same misleading comment. Be careful how you treat the Word of God. Read the genealogy. The first Jacob, the father of the first Joseph (hint: read Genesis, Judah was Joseph's older brother) lived about 1700 years before the Joseph that married Mary. First names were not very numerous back then and got used frequently.

The first half was interesting and, while speculative in some ways correctly emphasized the importance of Joseph. The second half confused Joseph the husband of Mary with Joseph, the father of Ephraim and Manasseh. They were separated by about 1700 years.

Pray to Jesus, my friend. Joseph can't help you.

It was wonderful right up to the point that he confused Joseph the husband of Mary with Joseph, the father of Ephraim and Manasseh. They were separated by about 1700 years.

Right up to the point that he confused Joseph the husband of Mary with Joseph, the father of Ephraim and Manasseh. They were separated by about 1700 years.

We don't know that. It was conjecture.

No. He absolutely was not! They were separated by over 1,000 years!

@@shilohauraablecommon sense ❤

@@shilohauraable More like 1700, but good point.

I heard said Joseph of Egypt built the step permed.

Yup. They were separated by about 1700 years.

Pray to Jesus, not Joseph. Joseph cannot help you.

Bless you

Provider and protector of the Holy Family. Not a slouch or a wimp. He is the model of purity for all men, and can rescue all men from the clutches of pornography and lasciviousness. I know. I am one who he has rescued. My Patron and the protector of the Universal Church.

Right up to the point that he confused Joseph the husband of Mary with Joseph, the father of Ephraim and Manasseh. They were separated by about 1700 years.

I was wondering why also.

@@barbarastephens6644 Especially since Joseph the husband of Mary is separated by his 34th great-grandfather by over 1700 years. It is all in the genealogy.

They are not the same Joseph!

The author confused Joseph the husband of Mary with Joseph, the father of Ephraim and Manasseh. They were separated by about 1700 years. Read Genesis 30 until the end of Genesis. There were not many names back then and they got reused. It would be like confusing the apostle John with John Kennedy simply because they both had the name John.

There is no historical reason to believe Mary was 13. Even back then women did not marry that early in Jewish culture.

@@donaldwilliamfry that is the age at which she had to leave the temple, where she had been from the age of three. I don't know at what age she had our Lord, Jesus Christ of Nazareth. It is covered by the Ethiopian Bible.

On what do you base the idea that Joseph was old? He certainly was older, but I know of no reason to assume him to be old other than mere assumption. That is my only disagreement with what you are saying.

@donaldwilliamfry It's in the Ethiopian Bible, Book of Jubilees. The Ethiopian Bible has been unchanged by royals or Rome since 300AD.

@@evelynbare1975 The book of Jubilees predates Joseph the husband of Mary by over 100 years. How could it have the age of Joseph in it? BTW the Ethiopian Bible has several books in it that are at least suspect. Enoch, for example, begins by lying about who wrote the book. Not exactly something that should be in the Bible.

He confused Joseph the husband of Mary with Joseph, the father of Ephraim and Manasseh. They were separated by about 1700 years.

We actually don't know anything about his death. That was all speculation.

Pray to Jesus. Joseph cannot help you.

That's your choice. The Roman Catholic Church has more ways to reach God which He taught His One true Church.

@@lucillebonds2196 I am afraid praying to or worshiping any but God alone is expressly forbidden by the Bible. You have been mislead, my friend. BTW. Just curious, are you born again?

Have greater respect for the Holy Spirit who gave us the scriptures. If Joseph was supposed to be front and center, he would have been in the scriptures. Same with Mary, I might add.

He was not the same man. Otherwise, he would have been 100's of years old. "Prince" Joseph in Egypt lived long before Joseph, husband of Mary.

@@christiansaint716 Joseph, the father of Judah, lived about 1700 years before Joseph the husband of Mary. It was 34 generations later.

@@donaldwilliamfry I'm afraid you have the names wrong. The first Joseph only had 2 sons by an Egyptian woman. He became the 2nd in power after the Pharaoh. The father of Judah (and Joseph) was Jacob.

This is incorrect. See the following passages: Matt. 12:46; 13:55; Mark 6:3; John 2:12; 7:3, 5, 10; Acts 1:14; 1 Cor. 9:5; Gal. 1:19). All of these specifically mention the brothers of Jesus in the context of Mary. Read Matt. 1:18-25 where it specifically says Mary and Joseph did not have sexual relations until after the birth of Jesus. The Catholic Church has misinformed you. The danger of this is that Mary and Joseph virtually get elevated to godhood, with misinformed people actually praying to the creation instead of to the God who created them.

@@donaldwilliamfry this is not incorrect my friend, it is the truth. See 2 Samuel 6:23, Matthew 13:33, Matthew 14:22, if you truly think “until” must always mean the action changes later. Then re-read Matthew 1:25. Jesus will always be at the right hand of God also not just “until” and then no longer at the right hand even after the enemies are made a footstool. Your proof text verses don’t say what you need them to say to fit your modern man-made doctrine. Scripture clearly says Jesus was “THE” son of Mary, never just “a” of Mary. Same with “THE” son of Joseph, not “a” son of Joseph. Bro, you need to understand what “brothers” can apply to, even cousins and uncles like for example with Lot and Abraham in Genesis - were they truly uterine “brothers”? Nope. Uncle and nephew. Yet they called “brothers”. Why? They used “brothers” more liberally than we do today as English speakers. Ancient Hebrew didn’t have “cousin” just “brother” or a circumlocution. Plus, even you should admit that at most they would not be true “brothers” but only “half” or “step” brothers. The Reformers all taught that Jesus was the only child of Mary and His legal father Joseph. Luther, Calvin, Zwingli, Wesley, etc. So, until you cite me just one e verse that says “Joseph begot James” or “Mary begot James, Simon, Jude, Salome, Mary, Joseph” etc., then I’ll continue to stand with Scripture and Christian history on this one as evidence by the Reformers.

But they weren't, Mary and Joseph were both Jews.

On what do you base praying to saints, either Catholic or otherwise?

Joseph was a carpenter, but the thought is true.

The father of all fathers is God the Father - not Joseph.

You pray for the U.S. Joseph has no power to receive prayers. That is God's department.

All those wives led Solomon the wise to become Solomon the apostate. Sad.