Surely it's clearly analysis/crticism, which supercedes copyright?

its almost valentines you know give these wonderful editors some chocolate

The effort and thought is appreciated

love how you just skip the important bits to make up a narrative and do as EVERY OTHER shill.

It wasn't really put up through any news media in fact it was put through his website on the KZfaq and Twitter for free. It's Tucker Carlson that's not strike claiming anything. The guy really does believe in the freedom of press, which is why an America catches so much crap. You've got the conservatives and the liberals that both attack him just because he thinks people should have freedom of information. I mean just look at this interview none of his questions were biased all he did was ask questions and let the man respond and show it to the world. You got to wonder why do so many people think that's a bad thing?

“In 2016 a gorilla was shot in Cincinnati”

Usa was founded 300 years ago Russia has a longer culture, I don't get this comment....

@@monkeywrenchstudios3590 there’s a joke on the internet about how the world hasn’t been the same since Harambe the gorilla was killed in 2016

@@monkeywrenchstudios3590 ~250*

overused joke. Man be original

The uk found one too

I know what a stupid self-own from the Mongolian to show all the territory his country lost to Russia 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'd be embarrassed to show that

And that Chinese officials began to seriously consider taking back Vladivostok.

@@LA-kc7ev “The Gang loses Siberia” eeeweeeweewuwuwuuuwuuuuuu

i have continuously made that argument, but as a german, it isn't usually received the way I mean it, at least online in written form.

Oh west...you are very silly.

@@mandulazold6237fuck russia

​@@mandulazold6237Right! Way funnier than the war criminal Putin, who started a war that has killed countless civilians, including children.

​@@mandulazold6237 Funnier than the war criminal putin.

@@VastumTempusToo mutch the fake news in USA. :) Where are natives in USA?

Watch the interview yourself ...

Yea that's a you problem dude. The information is widely laid bare at your fingertips. Educate yourself.

Do not trust a single word this bearded Brit is saying. Just watch the full interview

18:00 really dude? Joe Biden saying that he wouldn't let Nordstream or that there would be no Nordstream, whichever one, during a press conference isn't proof enough? He said "We'd make it happen" with a smirk. Come tf on.

Is this meant to be used as a way to say that the media is so biased that you have to get unbiased news from outside sources? If not, then the interview is still available everywhere else, Simon’s not hasan propagandist piker.

This is gold😂

thats the problem you see, the target audience was not smart enough to understand...

yeah and some hoi4 action with Danzig discussion

He also explained how Poland started the war because they had the nerve to not just give their country away. Imagine calling yourself a journalist and stay silent while someone tells you that Poland is to blame for the Second World War. Not only that, but it was Russia that actually started it, with a secret treaty with Germany... Amazing how Tucker didn't say one word about this, must be those because of those journalist schools for rich kids...

It actually is lmao

It was bias but it wasn't factually incorrect

@@quillo2747 the main take away from that it has nothing to do with invading Ukraine

I imagine plenty was left out but I recall many of the events and history he highlighted. That generally followed the evolution of the Russian state. Ukraine being a modern invention was news to me though. And even if there are several hundred year old claims to the territory I don't see the justification in expelling the people, language and culture that has arisen in its place since. They are ethnic cousins but it seems family fights, too.

There are plenty of videos picking apart the interview without having to go through the 2 hour of cringe fest.

@@TheRealAb216 it got everything to do with it. Uk. is a part of Russia. End of story. Western people do not understand the relations and that is precisely why he was explaining it.

The irony, he was a KGB agent persecuting anyone related to Christianity, then in this interview he was using Christianity (Russian Orthodoxy) as a reason to claim that he can “unite” with the confused Ukrainian people who don’t want to be friends with his authoritarian state, which is looking for their best interests, since after all, Orthodox Christianity is what unites them. (The Russian Orthodox Church of course, the one lead by Kiril, another former KGB informant)

у нас не любят играть в гольф)

Не дождëшься

@@Bon_Juryou’re right, we can’t wait. Granted most of us would rather him be on the golf course and get struck in the temple by another golfer’s ball. Only then to stroke out, would collapse and pi$$ himself like Stalin did. So yeah, we very much do wish. Ukraine gonna get that W, comrades.

@@pe_akilov3893it was hyperbole.

Fucking bullshit answer

😂😂😂

I don't see why Russia would destroy a pipeline that they control. It is only NATO that benefits from sabotaging the pipeline.

Sorry, I'm kind of slow lol can you rephrase that?..

You don't get close to Putin without a thorough background check. From your political affiliations to which side you were on in the OJ trial to the past and current license plates for the car of your 3rd grade teacher. Putin very likely knew Tucker's whereabouts during the Nordstream explosion ... probably on Fox talking about it. (When he still worked there)

@@EstbXCIII I think he is implying Putin/Russia's Intelligence did a deep investigation/spying on Tucker before the interview, to allow for him to sit across Putin

Huh

Appreciate the lotr reference

@@jonanderson-gm1it and I appreciate cultured folk

💀💀💀💀

Ahh cultured

Yet the way he presented, even if scripted, has bias. Which in turn will affect how “moralize” your point of view. If Simon were presenting this as neutral then he would t have to mention anything about how YOU, the viewer need to view this.

yet he did it anyway

But he moralizes throughout the whole video... I dont mind, I agree with his point of view, but why even say that?

People like you fall for propaganda like a fly on shit

​@SevenFifteenAM clearly he's biased but he still keeping it real

Comment of the year lol " they hate us because they ain't us "

Seth Rogan being such a Boromir towards Franco ruined any chance of us ever getting that sequel.

This is what I thought the whole time while watching the interview

This is literally what happened. Skylark received the same ridicule from the media too 😂

That would be perfect, theyve talked about how the us made a comedy movie out of killing un!! It must be such a strange thing for them not knowing that everything seen on a screen here wasnt made by the government!!

Hahaits it's TRUE! Really reminds me of the time where Ukraine didnt lose bahkmut but made a 'tactical retreat' and didnt fail every objective of their summer offensive but simply ' didnt have it go exactly to plan'

@@xxmissrussianxx1544literally not the same thing… 😂

He said they did it as a gesture of good faith to help finalize the negotiations. Think about it Putin has been soooo reserved during this told his soldiers to minimize civilian casualties as much as possible. Zelenski's 2nd in command who bailed out about a year ago was interviewed and said straight up Putin did everything in his power to stop this before it happened. He said Putin called them multiple times and said look just start acting right quit bombing the civilians of the donbas and I won't come in he said that Putin said "I don't want one single man woman or child to die I don't even want one house cat harmed so please make good on the accord's" and zelinski basically said f off and in he came.

Ruasian poodle. Literally. ​@@xxmissrussianxx1544

​​@@ianhill805 that's quite the lie especially because Putin openly refers to them as "Nazis" and constantly claims that they should be "exterminated". Russia's military doctrine doesn't accommodate civilian casualties and you can see that clear as day from their offensive fronts where they cause as much damage as possible to infrastructure to force the opposition to surrender. There's no way that you can believe that Russia is merciful during this war... Also, take into account the mass executions in small towns recorded by household and street cameras.

Simon probably doesn’t trust Tuckers translators

It's probably just to keep it from being automatically copystrike'd, since the audio's different now. It would have been a good idea to address it in the video though

@@keitolainen7459 it should go under fair use and not need the change

He wants to sound British

@@zalachor9007thats true, but hed still have to probably go through delays and appeals. Even then, ive seen youtube not honor fair use. But the original translation was a bit sloppy because it was done in real time.

United nations described United States actions in Africa during 2018 as "the worst atrocities against humanity since the second world war". Sooo, shut your mouth.

Half million deaths. Ha. Small numbers. Merica strong baby. We displace that many refugees in a single country in a year with over thrown democracies. For decades, we put up those numbers.

Ukrain pushed themselves to this war. American puppets

'To the last Ukrainian'. Remember? It's geopolitical affair. Doesn't concern innocent children like you.

​@@aachoocrony5754dude, chill

Simon’s cherry picking has quite deliberately shown he’s all about influencing his viewers.

I mean... it's a summery the IMPORTANT bits... when something is 2 hours long and filled with tangents YEA... he's gonna remove a lot of that and some good stuff may be missed, we're humans... not robots, but the intentions are good.@@SSoF-07y08z

@@SSoF-07y08zok ok, I believe you

@@SSoF-07y08zNot difficult to pick those cherries hey! They fall from beneath Putins forked tongue whenever he speaks. There clearly cannot be peace until he has gone. Russia will be sanctioned for decades.

I watched it. It just an interview nothing more

Indeed. I really enjoyed how he contextualised the whole thing.

Brits lol

You do realize he doesn't write the script if the person who wrote the script didn't say anything about Boris Johnson nothing about Boris Johnson is going to be said in the video by Simon.

@@GrievousRebornwell that unprofessional for such a professional channel Putin brought up Boris throughout the whole interview lol

The Boris Johnson moment that Putin mentioned is fake, it never happened

Of course he does he's a Shill for their System and doesn't want Scotland Yard at his doorstep for wrong thinking.

Putin just didn't want NATO to turn Sevastopol into a NATO Naval base when Russia has been using that base for hundreds of years. Yanukovych signed the Kharkiv Pact extending the Sevastopol naval lease to Russia. Yanukovych was overthrown by coup. Putin acted to protect its interest in Crimea as any global power would have.

But if we're gonna talk alliances. Do you believe any country should be able to join any military alliance it wants. Would it be acceptable for Russia to ally Cuba and then put tons of offensive weapons 90 miles from Florida. Would if be acceptable if Russia helped overthrow Canada's government?

​@@LeftWingNationalist, first, credit Ukrainian people, not the CIA, for the end of Yanukovych's rule

别担心，我们很快就会开始在南美建立军事基地。单一超级大国的时代已经结束。现在已经是路的尽头了。

@@LeftWingNationalist oh yes, the yanukovich argument, the most corrupt Ukrainian president that almost sold his country to russia

How so? it's in English translation those words arnt his own??😂

@@Fu.com47cus thats how politicians work russian or not russian. They lie

@@Fu.com47I think you missed the point a little. Yes, those are the words he said, but they are still a lie. Politicians generally say whatever they need to get into power and then doggedly hold on for dear life. Autocrats repress the opposition and deny reality, democratic nations pin blame for events outside of their control on the previous government to inflate their own image and grip on power, communist nations ensure they have only one ruling party so they win by default. Dictatorships murder the populace to strengthen their death grip on the top spot. The list goes on. The point being, if you truly believe your rulers, political parties and national leaders give a crap about your wellbeing, your life and your happiness, you’re sadly mistaken. They don’t. None of them have ever done. Maybe before they get into office, but that soon ceases to be the case. They care about what they can extract from the situation, in terms of nepotistic support for their friends, power, fame, money, legacy, changes to laws to benefit their own leanings. That is the reality of life, politicians lie.

Good one.

​@@Fu.com47 Are you saying that the translation is misleading? How so?

Too bad he skipped the most important notes to skew the whole video.

​@@shasvrefirios1536what parts?

@@drmantistoboggan2870 Putin mentions Nato's promise not to expand east. Simon completely glosses that over. The reassurances then US secretary of state James A. Baker made to former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev during a meeting on February 9, 1990. In a discussion on the status of a reunited Germany, the two men agreed that NATO would not extend past the territory of East Germany, a promise repeated by NATO’s secretary general in a speech on May 17 that same year in Brussels. Russia and the West finally struck an agreement in September that would allow NATO to station its troops beyond the Iron Curtain. However, the deal only concerned a reunified Germany, with further eastward expansion being inconceivable at the time.

@@drmantistoboggan2870 But he also did the same crap in his Japan attacking the US video. Conveniently forgetting that the US had US pilots in US aircraft killing Japanese pilots over China, before Pearl harbor. I want to like Simon but he pulls this crap when it comes to history / politics.

@@shasvrefirios1536 what parts did he get wrong about the putin interview?

Thank you for your years of service.

All complete fascist bullshit.

Like

Oh my

And they say Americans don’t do irony!

Weird no one else did? I recon you got hit by a deepfake video.

The creepy AI one? Yeah. Strange times.

​@@smuthoper8r476 it's ai? Damn wtf! Someone actually took time to do that too 🤦sigh so much for KZfaq

Putin hasn’t stayed in his position as long as he has by being honest. This interview is pretty clearly him continuing this trend.

It's pretty pathetic when the best card someone can play is criticizing "interventionism" for stopping a genocide. It's akin to criticizing England, France, and the US for fighting Germany during WW2.

@@seventh-hydraThat is false it was completely and utterly manufactured claim to bomb Serbia the CIA backed the terrorist KLA to push that nonsense. Putin is correct either you uphold international law or you’re a hypocrite and now your facist government is arming and funding and actual genocide in Israel actually hypocrisy is too mild of a word to explain it Im sure it’s just malice and pure evil willing to do anything to hold on to global dominance.

@@fastmadcow It’s not just by him being dishonest, that he’s remained in power: Politicians the world over, are renowned for lying and dishonesty….that’s nothing unique or new… The difference is that in many democracies, there’s the opportunity for them to be questioned and cross-examined on what they said or did etc etc…there are times when this happens, when a politician literally falls to pieces.. This doesn’t happen with Putin, as he’s created a set-up politically where he is only extremely rarely (almost to the point of never) questioned or seriously cross-examined, and anyone who does dare criticise him publicly, in Russia, is in danger of a prison sentence..,

Yep.

Nobody has said that that tho?

​@@decrulezI swear people love to make stuff up. I never heard that either.

@@decrulezDude… I’ve seen it? Your’s and the other commenters YT algorithm must be different from mine cause I saw people saying it was treason to do this at LEAST three times, and that’s not involving Twitter

@@decruleztons of cable news reporters, and YT channels flipped out about this interview.

Simon said, "the only thing we're interested in is facts." Then proceeded to call him a journalist.

​@@natesmith8020Tucker is a Journalist, just conservative

​@@natesmith8020He is a journalist. Grow up.

​@@sandsandwich9217Didn't his lawyer's in 2022 argue he wasn't a journalist to get out of a defamation case.

​@@thanerobbo4776 And also argued that no rational person would believe what he said. But sure he's a journalist.

Sure, if you like a biased perspective cherry picking stuff

So platform any and all persons you morally abhore? I don't think so. I'll take a well guided breakdown over rage watching any day. And there's nothing wrong with that. Saying "just" implies deficiency, just don't follow braindead breakdown sources

@@slikskils1603it is deficient to be unable to watch the source content, whatever your reason might be.

Probably gonna loose a lot of Brain Cells listening to the whole shit show

100%

​@@slikskils1603sounds like you're a very biased "mind made up" person. No wonder you DON'T wanna the actual thing and make up your mind because, as we have already seen from you... You prejudged the whole thing. By the way: not only did I watch the ENTIRE thing, I also watched this summary. Pro tip, you can speed up KZfaq videos up to 2x. That really helps 👍

What questions? Did i missed why are you killing your political opponents? Why did you invaded Ukraine without going back to Mathusalem? What did i miss except the revisionist take of Putin on Europe history?

As well as the loose ends and context needed missing in the original.

I don't believe you will ever hear Putin 'unfiltered'. Bias and propaganda is his filter.

If you think an interview by someone like Tucker Carlson with someone like Putin, posted by official channels after being edited by the Kremlin, is unfiltered? That is... a highly questionable stance. Between the vetting of questions, the nature of the interviewer and interviewee, the editing, and finally their willingness to post it at all, that's a whoooole bunch of filters.

so the stupid westerners who gave the putler money can finally gaze into madness that they sponsored and under which we had to suffer for 25 years

It's a shame that our large established news channels cannot be like this.

@@Karlach_ they’re utterly lost.

Refreshingly honest? Where have you been getting your information before this?

​@@Jonathan-jp4zzPutin said the same. So both did it?

@@Jonathan-jp4zz I could list for you reasons why destroying Nordstream would actually benefit Putin personally. Would you like to hear them?

Lots of armed conflicts in the news i suppose 🙁 this is adjacent

I'd rather it be a separate channel tbh.

@@grimgrahamch.4157 Another one?!

Absolutely! The last couple if years his videos have become propoganda. He used a silly voice over that changes the language Putin used to make him sound stupid! Instead of using the original voice over of which there is nothing wrong! I would put money on Simon having ties to a western intelligence agency. We know that the CIA has done things like this. For example the agents present storming and encouraging the White house. When I go to a job interview I look out for the company bragging about how much they care about staff and how they promote them and have awards. That is a strong sign they do the opposite. Simon made a big fuss about how un biased he is. That is another strong sign he is extremely biased.

It’s fair, unbiased and doesn’t tell you what you should think… im here for it. How news should be.

There was also a verbal agreement when the Berlin Wall fell that we wont move eastward between the Russians and us. There were also people high in the policy making in the US Govt warning the people running the govt that the red line is Ukraine. Everything was ignored from the verbal agreement, the Budapest Memorandum and the Minsk Agreements. The only way to get the Russian Army out of Ukraine is to use force. I volunteer you and the others for the front line in this avoidable war. A lot of people have lost common sense over the years. Our senseless wars Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen and else where. Who blew up the Nord Stream I and II? Surprisingly that wasn't talked about in the interview too!

A valid point, but please recall that the USA violated that in 2014 and the Russian violation was a response.

Are ypu really that daft? You know they were killing civilians in Donbas right? The Minsk agreements didn't fall apart the president we put into office refused to comply.....

​@@Kavala76the difference is one have proof of exists (documents) & the second is just something people say leaders talk without documentation.

​@@Kavala76 We didn't violate anything

😂

I’m wondering the same thing…

Maybe copyright infringement

Not just different, but did a seemingly horrible job on purpose.

@@brightessan never thought of that, but then why not the visual aspect of it and only the audio??

The rights of the specific US translator voice wasn’t probably copyrighted by the broadcaster. While the video is probably available for public use as news, I can see Mr. Carlson wanting to be paid for the use of his translator. This might also explain discrepancies in the translation; the translator might have made different choices in translating certain phrases (translations are always about choices, because idioms simply don’t translate, period) to be a demonstratively independent translation and not just working from the prior translation. TLDR: whether it originated with Simon or his source for the video, the use of a different translation was probably more about not being dependent on Mr. Carlson and/or not putting extra money in his pocket.

They edit stuff like that out

Your eyes adjust to the bright lights after a minute or so before the cameras roll. And if it comes on anyway you can just look away.

Imagine someone disregarded by a sneeze instead of actual facts. No wonder people are so overrated by their feelings.

How many times an hour do you sneeze? Lol

@@kaecake9575 😘 you get me

That was the first thing that came into my mind, I need to watch it again

Now watch a Biden speech.

They did the meme.

I am stupid, so tel me what do I have to know?

franco is a predator...allegedly

All of those still belong to Ivan and not globohomo

THANK YOU !! he wants to sound as if Russia and Ukraine were these brothers who’s bond could NEVER be severed. Stalin did just as worse to the Ukrainian people then hitler did. Therefore they will NEVER BE APART OF RUSSIA

Putin could but interview probably ends in 12h or so ;)

Why would he?

@@jontaedouglas7244 Homie, nobody wants any part of the Ukrainians. But the Russians that was living the territories that were given mistakenly to this "Ukraine". That's part of Russia. You and your Nazi sympathizers can stay at the Western part.

He probably thinks that most of his audience is in the US.

Boris added nothing of value... Which i guess is standard for his political career as a whole.

@@stanisawzokiewski3308 more the extremely crucial information that is they had a peace agreement, Ukraine had signed it and the fat ass Boris came and sabotaged it. Because of that probably over 500.000 men have died and half of Ukraine are in ruins. Its not entirely Boris fault, Ukraine tossed aside aswell but he do bare alot of responsibility for what is happening right now

considering how important that part actually was pretty important for making eu look bad.....i doubt it@@orion3253 unbiased this video was not

If you watched him you would know that he has no qualms for criticizing Boris Johnson or the UK… he constantly does it himself on his other channels, and everywhere else tbh.

This. It was his big pitch. And it's still not a very compelling argument is it? He started a war because of some convoluted historical claims and because Nato wouldn't let them sit at the cool kids table? Fr?

from a rujssian's dissident's perspective who i like, this is just what Ptin has been repating to his own people over and over again nonstop everywhere in russia. He was bored cause he had heard al this. But people don't know it and the actual replies to what it leaves out. Putin is looking at iike a czar. yes the criticism are valid, but they miss the central point of how actually we heard all this before- from Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin. The same victimization narrative to justify little fascism, the all powerful police state and hard censorship, the "corruption" of anti-imoerailist arguments when yo are an imperalist- which is the point, putin identifies himself with Russian strongman orthodox culture, seems in great power terms- the problem was the world kind of did the "never again" to aggressive fasicim like this, and thats the new thing russia was missing.

​@@thirdtooth4069"we are going to punish NATO by attacking a country that is not in NATO" Yah, that sounds like logic to me.

​@@hypersonichobo4263 It's a NATO patsy

@@thirdtooth4069 You didn't listen to him then. The west had started this in 2014 and not Russia. Russia was trying to stop this this whole time.

Except that he is telling you what to think. When it comes to the analysis part of this video he's giving you a certain interpretation of what happened, and then saying "Oh but you make your own mind up", which I suppose is fine if you look at analysis by several other people, but it would the hight of stupidity to watch this and think you're genuinely thinking for yourself' by basing your own opinion on what's provided here. As other people in the comments have said, he skipped over parts which could be considered relevant.

@@Ballardian oh no, someone told I was told what to think while calling me stupid on the Internet. What can I do? I watched the video, there was no bias and they said to watch the interview yourself. This is a far cry from most Western media. They told me what was said, not what to think. This is an important distinction. You are permitted to disagree, but that does not mean you are right. Enjoy 😊

Given that Tucker's constantly spouting Russia propoganda talking points verbatim for quite some time. It's a lot less surprising.

@@davescott7680 Let's give up any understanding and just head on right into WWIII. Are you willing to join the draft?

Im surprised it wasn’t Sean Penn this time.

​@@JoeMACofNAC??

​@JoeMACofNAC oh! you believe tucker saved us? How cute. Did you know that after tucker was fired from Fox News and costing them $787 million for lying about voter machine fraud, RT came out publicly saying that tucker is a friend of Russia and would be a great fit for the state sponsored propaganda station?

It's a shame the translation is just a little bit different with different words used. Makes Putin sound a touch more militant.

He would, but neither we nor the poles would want this worthless piece of land. It's what you get when you use an enclave as nothing but a missile base for half a century.

@@AllisterCaine Yea, but then the Poles are there to blame for everything - WW2, existence of Ukrainians, the war in Ukraine itself, etc. So no way in hell they'll get anything! lol

or to Czechia... who´s king its named after in his honour by crusaders...

I had to google that word. I’m a university educated person and I don’t think I’ve ever seen “revanchist.” Thanks for the new word of the day.

I believe the reason he spent so much time framing it as a conflict about historical land claims, was simply to make the majority of NATO governments look hypocritical when given the stance they take on the Israel Palestine conflict.

This is not the same translator or translation from the original video.

@@FormerGovernmentHuman sounds pretty fuckin similar to me mate

@@NuculearFallout1weird. The tucker Carlson channel has a totally different translator voice lol. I was also shocked cause I watched the full interview before this.

@@FormerGovernmentHuman correct. This is the Kremlin's version (Top left of the screen says so)

The interview on Tucker Carson's KZfaq channel is a different translator to this one​@@NuculearFallout1

watch the full interview he skipped a bunch of important points

​@@AXXVTX Exactly. Why the hell is everyone in this comment section watching this 21 minute video by some random-ass hat KZfaqr when they can just go watch the original interview and draw their own conclusions?

You aren't thinking for yourself

@@craigmenear-lordofqualityp507 when you cant handle the reality you want it prefiltered by obviously biased sources so your world view doesnt get destroyed. Also people just dont like it to be wrong.

​​@@craigmenear-lordofqualityp507why would I want to listen to a long-ass interview with the person being interviewed being someone who wants to rehabilitate Stalin's image. Stalin a monster on the same level as Hitler that killed millions of people.

The Russians never even followed Minsk one. I’m tired of hearing about it like it was EVER an option.

the kgb invaded ukraina it was an act of aggression on sovereign soil nothing else matters, especially not the kgb fake news

There is atrocity and horror in war and the Russians are no different. You also need to understand that vast resources are poured into the Ukranian popoganda machine, fueled by the west. They literally have one party, on authorized news agency, there IS no democracy or free press. Western Ukraine is Russian speaking, Donetsk and Lugansk are RUSSIAN speaking, and have been being shelled, airstriked and raided since 2014. Targeting civilian populations is the definition of massacre and declaration of war. Are Russians on the side of good, hell no. But you really need to realize just how much we've been misled, and it will have you questioning all of it.

@@ZESAUCEBOSS Keeping on preaching, the russians actually upped payments to the separatists after Minsk.

Uhh bro the battle began before the implementation of the treaty

Well that's disconcerting. Not sure I trust a Kremlin source.

Thank you for that. I was very confused by the translator. I watched the original video and the translator's voice was completely different than what's on this video. I wonder why Simon & Co didn't use the original video.

Ikr and allowing us to not have to give Tucker any viewed hours on the actual video. Brilliant.

don't worry, plenty of us gave him the view. Even several views@@gastonorozco5974

​@@gastonorozco5974Which one of your favourite journos got an interview like this?

But a 2hr Biden interview would be absolute bliss..... I'm not sure you realise how weak this made American leadership look to outsiders

⁠@@tobiasmccallum9697we live in an age of weak, incompetent and lazy leaders so men like Putin who love their country and people more than anything else stand out very much. I think people underestimate just how important history going back hundreds of years is to the current age, just look at the Israel conflict one that is the product of 2000 years of history. We are suffering immensely here in my country of Australia from exactly this, a long list of leaders who care little for our country and it’s people. Leaders who can talk, lie and blame but never act as the nation crumbles and the people care less and less for their nation under their watch.

How did he gain your trust by using a different translator and different words coming out of Putins mouth!

Wow, really? He mislead in this vid hugely. Did so in his Pearl harbor vid too.

@@shasvrefirios1536 You are misleading in your entire life hugely, did so in this comment too. Source: Same as you, trust me bro.

@@Sepulchh And you are full of crap, in your entire life. But hay, have a nice day in your half the facts world.

@@shasvrefirios1536it’s was over 2 hours long and quite literally the majority of it was Putin talking about the “history” leading up to why he decided to invade

Or biden as a competent leader which truly represent the average American intelligence

What because he interviews Putin? Seems like a pretty standard journalistic thing to do instead of speculating with apparent certainty what Putin thinks, as every other ‘journalist’ has done on this topic.

@@52darceyMainstream media doesn't want transparency. Easier to silence. This is why they removed RT news from youtube.

3:16 over here in hutto tx

Just finished this and it's almost 2 am here in NorCal, Agreed!

Constant state of fear and confusion is the best way to rule.

3 in the morning here in Ohio and I was about to go to bed but I can watch this first 😅

@@Karlach_ ik you’re lying because it’s 3am here in Cali rn

Narrative

Called post-edit. This one was the real-time one during the interview. The one on TC's channel was added after the fact.

I believe there's 2 translators at the same time. One of the Russian side, one on Tuckers side? I could be mistaken

Putin speaks perfect English, and we all know it, because he used to brag about it. So why didn't he just do the interview in English if he didn't want an misinterpretation?

Well, it could be to avoid copyright, it also can be an independent translation to remove bias.

Well he is a war criminal so...

... and he was biased.

Agreed. I've been a fan of Simon for years, but this video makes me respect him even more. Too many people throw a political bias in and it alienates part of the audience. You don't have to like Tucker, you don't have to like Putin, but this was a conversation worth watching (I just haven't found 2 hours to watch it), so I appreciate such an impartial summary.

​@@korana6308 yeah even had that sinister music in the background to solicit emotional response

If you call standing up to this maniac “biased”, then you’re on the wrong side of history.

@@killerbye1985It’s “political bias” if one calls out the sycophancy of Tucker and the diabolism of this liar and tyrant?

More than likely it was a ploy to get in, just so they can hinder NATO from within. That's basically all they do in the UN

Makes you wonder if Russia was truly interested, Clinton telling him no and then NATO expanding torward Russia…

There really is no surprise, the entire point of NATO is to defend against russia.

Russia also does not think that the North Atlantic Alliance has abandoned the idea of attacking Russia. Your logic works both ways

Another way to read that is that, regardless of what the presedent of the US says they can or will do, they arent actually in charge. Most other leaders of countries can make decisions. It seems that he is highlighting that the US presedent actually has way less authority over anything then what we are led to believe.

It's the actual translator who was translating live as the interview happened. Carlson's translator is a voice actor reading the transcript after the fact.

How do you know it has not been altered?@@resileaf9501

I knew about it ,but for days after this is the most extensive I’ve seen breakdown actually probably the only breakdown. On both sides the isle even. People in power and pull obviously didn’t want common people to see it. Guess we can’t be trusted to take unfiltered information in and gaze into the minds of someone who is responsible for a lot of what’s going on in the world.

I understand that in your country they will never show the truth the truth is very sad and you do not know the whole truth I am from Russia Moscow

I’d rather listen to 100 chihuahuas bark for two hours than suffer through Carlson’s whiny voice

@@wmpx34 if you watched the interview its probably least ive ever heard carlson talk. People find him annoying cos he dares to ask the questions that not many are prepared to ask or the ones that go against the agenda.

​@@DavidHarsant1I think it's more that he was fired from his top tier job for knowingly lying about the election being stolen resulting in a massive judgement against the news organization. Americans actually arent that interested in listening to proven liars. Perhaps things are different in Moscow, though.

​@@DavidHarsant1, we don't need to listen to Putin's monologue to understand Russian history or Eastern European history in general. There are better sources out there for learning the history of that part of the world.

Simon is good at that.

The closest you're going to realistically get to "no spin" is something like it the Associated Press fact checkers comment on it. But people will always view things as "spin" if it disagrees with what they think is true.

The problem is that much of what is spoken about in the interview doesnt actually have much facts to check. Putin didnt even have to lie about some of the information he just guided it towards what he wanted and left out the details that are used to counter many of his points. I just finished a modern Ukrainian history course we started in the 7th century to modern day basically his whole rant. Interestingly enough my professor who grew up in the USSR was honest from the start there are 3 major ideas revolving around Ukraine. The Polish perspective, the Russian perspective and the Ukrainian. The easiest way to describe it is this. Poland wants to argue that the people all fled from the now area of Ukraine after the Kyivan Rus collapsed and when Polish settlers came into these territories they found no one so Ukrainians are just Polish people who settled and changed over time. The Russian perspective is that after the Rus collapsed the people fled north to Novgorod/Muscovy and that these are just misguided Russians left behind. Ukraine argues that the people didnt leave just the Rus collapsed and that the poles moved into an occupied are of modern Ukraine and came across Ukrainians. I was stunned when I saw Putin make that exact argument. Ironically enough though we also need to understand modern nation building and historical nation building. Countries always need to create legitimacy for modern democracies our leaders depend on the democratic process, rule of law, and our ethics/rights meaning that our leaders are supposed to be the best fair representation of the populations will. In the past much of this was done through blood lineage. Since Russia converted to orthodox and Byzantium no longer existed the church who produced the primary Chronicle made everything line up where leaders all stem from a bloodline and that's their legitimacy. Putin uses this argument drawing direct legitimacy to Russias claim on the information that we have which is primarily from the original historical texts which came from you guessed it the Orthodox church which at the time was led by Russia. So much of this is all debated heavily. Moving onto his next point Bohdan Khmelnytsky, yes he made an agreement with Russia, but he left out the true reasons it was a shit show long dispute between Polish royalty and himself, the poles took his land killed his wife, but then Bohdan ended up marrying the Poles wife (just a mess of a situation) nevertheless he made agreements with Muscovy where they would fight against the Poles and Lithuanians. The agreement is very much argued to wether it was subordinating Ukraine to Russia or wether it was an agreement of mutual aid (the academics dont have an answer so trust me Putin doesnt either.) Its also important to note that at this time there were two kind of classes in the Russian dominated Ukrainian areas Kossacks were registered or unregistered. Bohdan was registered so this was a Kossack who engaged in politics with Russia vs unregistered which didnt conform to the imperial system. He then glossed over Ivan Mazepa another Ukrainian Kossack. Mazepa during the Swedish-Russian wars actually crossed sides and supported the Swedes because Peter I was to relieve him as hetman (leader) of the zaphorizian sich or the registered kossacks in left bank Ukraine and replace him with a Russian leader. At the time Sweden had progressed through Poland and most of Western Ukraine. Peter sent his forces down crushed the rebellion and the sich Mazepa fled dying not very long later. At this point Ukrainian identity or the Kossacks existed in alot smaller of a role other than more or less symbolic slaves of the Russian empire. Then we have his comments on Poland though they did take land from the Czechs this was disputed territory since the end of WW1 he called them collaborators, yet failed to mention the secret protocols signed during the Molotov Ribbentrop pact that set "zones of influence" between Germany and Russia. Then leading the Russian winter war and the forced annexation of the Baltics. All of this was denied for most of the Soviet period but under Gorbachev and glastnost (openness) they admitted to the secret protocols and annexation at gunpoint of the Baltics. Oh also they annexed part of Romania bessarabia and present day Moldova (ding ding tranistrias a problem too). Stepping back for a second he never mention Ukrianian independence movements during the Soviet civil war Ukraine had multiple divided groups and weir warlord organisations. Socialist anarchists joined the reds in left bank Ukraine and the strongest Ukrainian independence group (this is where many of the Ukrainian symbols of today come from like the Tryzbub) had expanded to Kyiv but was sandwiched between the Polish independence movement who claimed the territory and the Bolsheviks. This is all I can comment on that I remembered he mention in his rant but I'll say one final thing. Most history we have today isnt factual its historical myth. All nations create historical myths to further their legitimacy, Russia, Ukraine hell America, Britain and everyone else has these Myths. Putin went on this rant to set his version of history on the world. He doesnt need it to be true he just needs it to be plausible enough for people to think hes smart and that it could be right all the while hes actively changed textbooks in Russia (history textbooks specifically) to align with this version. His idea of we were there it's all ours makes little sense if you look at places like kaliningrad or the fact most of modern Russia should probably go back to the mongols cause there were there first. I hope this provided some insight if you have any other questions feel free to ask.

@@nolanorvold4442putin attacking ukraine to protect russian minority is just as valid as nato attacking serbia to protect croatian minority. Which one is correct? If it’s illegal, then both are illegal. If it’s legal than both is legal

He put a silly voice over on it instead of using the original translator. A silly voice which changes the language to make Putin seem stupid. He did a dreadful job. With the ammount of propoganda videos Simon has put out in recent years I would bet money on him having ties to a western intelligence agency.

Was thinking the same.

Yes

yeah hes doing the "fixed version"

I was just about to comment the same thing. Who is this translator and why did they switch from the original one? A lot of stuttering and "uh"s makes him sound very unprofessional.

​@@kenm3855what do you mean "fixed"?

You shouldn't listen to only one person........ Go watch others like Jackson Hinkle, Scott Ritter, and Douglas Mc Gregor even Jimmy Dore will get you a less bias interpretation

Don't super remember asking you@@mjp6099

@@mjp6099you say you prefer to listen to less biased people, but it is telling that all of your suggestions have the exact same biases and political alignment. Everyone has biases so the only way to truly obtain an unbiased view is to hear different perspectives. You’re just listening to people with whom you already agree.

OMG why trust a translated version with dozens of facts omitted when you can listen to the original 😂😂😂

@@mjp6099 Scott Ritter? Great guy. Love his criminal past.

Simon is also biased

Then why are you even here?

Then go watch it?

@@Sammmeow It was in recommended, I clicked to see if the outlet was being fair or purposefully spinning things in a different way to fit their narrative.

@@ashleywenner1050 I did. And it makes watching these videos even more entertaining. Because having seen the interview before is like playing poker while knowing everyone else's cards. you know when people are bluffing/bullshitting and its quite entertaining. Seeing which channel does proper journalism and which channel does activism while also checking comments to see if their attempt at activism and propaganda is working. CBS new take on that interview was extremely biased for example and they had to remove comments. Its important to have a better global understanding of how many people follow blindly the narrative and how many are doubtfull or call out the bullshit. Its basically like a market study.🗿

I'd assume you watched a video released by Tucker Carlson, Simon found it on a russian website, so that might explain why ☺️

It’s either that it was translated from the original undubbed interview which is available online, or used a different translator to avoid it being copyright striked through automated screening. Happens a lot to creators, even if using a clip with permission, which is frustrating!

European translation.

It is the translation for Europeans and Americans provided by the CIA because their citizens are not allowed to listen and think for themselves lol

I am wondering the same. Its unnerving. Tho after watching both, he dosent realy say much that differs... the odd word and slang...

don't listen to translation just listen to the pukler burying himself in his own words

how is it unnerving its just a different translator@@rickyfinn2763

Honestly he completely dropped the 20 minute talk they had about peace, and how zelensky is no longer willing to talk for it, or the scratched agreement in Istanbul

I am the walrus…

F*CK it Dude, let's go bowling.😎

Translation error

This aggression will not stand, man.

I am the walrus

Tucker went soft asf . Guess that's the most he was allowed

Go watch the lady from Vice ask hard questions then get back to us lol people like her drive true journalism and change

Not saying it was hard hitting journalism. I just didn’t have a very high bar set so I was surprised

Haven't watched it yet, but I'm half jokingly saying if he went too hard he'd probably have had an 'accident' on the way back to his hotel or whatever and the interview would never have see the light of day.

He didn’t ask anything other than what Putin would have agreed to in advance. The interview was carefully curated by Putin’s team. An Carlson likely agreed to strict terms before he was able to set foot in the Kremlin and likely was also perceived in advance to be more of mailable non-confrontation yes man to Putin than anyone from NBC.