No video

The Ugliest Most Beautiful Most Destructive Plane Ever Built

  Рет қаралды 242,053

Dark Skies

Dark Skies

8 ай бұрын

On a grim October day in 1961, the skies echoed with the unique roar of a single Tupolev Tu-95, soaring with a weight more than the bomb it carried, its belly harboring mankind's most terrifying creation: the Tsar Bomba.
Cameras inside the aircraft captured the palpable tension while those outside awaited the impending detonation. Outside, the world held its breath. The countdown dwindled, awaiting the release of the most devastating thermonuclear device ever conceived.
In the uncertain atmosphere of the early 1960s, the Soviet Union, fueled by a mix of fear and ambition, pushed the boundaries of nuclear testing. Specially modified to give its crew a chance, the Tu-95 was painted in ghostly anti-flash white. It was as much a test for the bomb as it was for the bomber, which, decades later, remains as current as ever as part of Russia’s ambitions.
---
Join Dark Skies as we explore the world of aviation with cinematic short documentaries featuring the biggest and fastest airplanes ever built, top-secret military projects, and classified missions with hidden untold true stories. Including US, German, and Soviet warplanes, along with aircraft developments that took place during World War I, World War 2, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, the Gulf War, and special operations mission in between.
As images and footage of actual events are not always available, Dark Skies sometimes utilizes similar historical images and footage for dramatic effect and soundtracks for emotional impact. We do our best to keep it as visually accurate as possible.
All content on Dark Skies is researched, produced, and presented in historical context for educational purposes. We are history enthusiasts and are not always experts in some areas, so please don't hesitate to reach out to us with corrections, additional information, or new ideas.

Пікірлер: 362
@Bigsky1991
@Bigsky1991 8 ай бұрын
As a 10 year old in 1971, my Dad and one of his fellow Korean War Ranger buddies took us deep sea fishing out of the Keys. After being out all day, at about 4pm I heard a very distinct " Thrummmm"... it was a Bear Bomber at barely 2000 feet.... just off the left wingtip were two Navy F-4 Phantoms in hi-vis paint and markings off the USS America gently edging the Bear away from US airspace...the 4 J-79 engines belching black smoke flying at slow/inefficient airspeed.... I started yelling and waving so proud to be an American! I saved up the rest of the summer, and birthday money, I built all three models exactly as I saw them tha day and proudly hung them with fishing line from my bedroom ceiling.
@MiltonFindley
@MiltonFindley 7 ай бұрын
I have only seen one, at about 30 feet above the wavetops and 15 feet off the port bridge wing of the Gearing Class destroyer I was on. He had caught us with our pants down around our ankles with our air search radar off. This was in February 1973. The after lookout had warned us of his approach by saying, "There is a big assed airplane back here!" by the time the JA talker his gotten halfway through that sentence we were breathing the exhaust fumes as they blew over us.
@olivertaylor8788
@olivertaylor8788 7 ай бұрын
Bless your heart
@jordanwyatt9610
@jordanwyatt9610 7 ай бұрын
B52 has always been jet powered. Was never a prop plane😂
@johnking6252
@johnking6252 7 ай бұрын
Ahhh the good ole days of the Cold War ! 🇺🇲
@draufganger620
@draufganger620 6 ай бұрын
I love it
@paulkoch9871
@paulkoch9871 8 ай бұрын
I never saw a prop on a B-52, and I built the engines for them.
@user-cf1se1kk5x
@user-cf1se1kk5x 6 ай бұрын
he does that on purpose so people comment on it. he has been doing that for a long time now.
@otpyrcralphpierre1742
@otpyrcralphpierre1742 3 ай бұрын
Yeah, that occurred to me too.
@dennisyoung4631
@dennisyoung4631 2 ай бұрын
Turbojets, then later ‘fans?
@paulqueripel3493
@paulqueripel3493 8 ай бұрын
The Brabazon wasn't powered by turboprops, it used Bristol Centaurus radials. The unbuilt second prototype would have used Proteus turboprops.
@LtRoastAhoe
@LtRoastAhoe 8 ай бұрын
You're going to have to redo the research on this one. Seems like chat GPT messed up writing this one for you. B52 is obviously not turboprop powered, the top speed of the tu95 is not 650km/h it's in excess of 925... Which is impressive in its own right. Service ceiling is also above 12000m...
@sparky4878
@sparky4878 8 ай бұрын
B52H is turbofan. Previous were turbo jet and the original design that won the contract was actually a turboprop.
@TalkieToaster.
@TalkieToaster. 8 ай бұрын
The B52 has been powered by turbofans (TF33) since the H model in 1961, earlier models used turbojets.
@LtRoastAhoe
@LtRoastAhoe 8 ай бұрын
Regarding the b52, excuse the typo I meant turboprop as stated in the video, not turbofan.
@alcocklake
@alcocklake 8 ай бұрын
I'm sure they meant B-36
@joostprins3381
@joostprins3381 8 ай бұрын
He said it was over 900, 700 cruise.
@PitViper329
@PitViper329 8 ай бұрын
@2:43 The B-52 did NOT use turboprops!! Where the hell did you get this idea?!?
@sparky4878
@sparky4878 8 ай бұрын
The original design that won the contract for what became the B52 had six turbo-props. But that never flew. Perhaps was alluding to that. It went through various changes, different numbers of engines and types, as the government’s requirements changed. Eventually becoming the eight jet we now know.
@The123michaelsilva
@The123michaelsilva 8 ай бұрын
The original design of the B52 was powered by turboprops
@MysticalDragon73
@MysticalDragon73 8 ай бұрын
@@sparky4878 its too much of a stretch to call the 462 the original design of the b52. In all reality the original design could only be the prototype version. The 462 was straight wing turbo prop not even close to what we have as the b52.
@nesyboi9421
@nesyboi9421 8 ай бұрын
He probably mixed up turbojets and turboprops to be honest
@MysticalDragon73
@MysticalDragon73 8 ай бұрын
@nesyboi9421 tbh that was my thought too. There's no way I could think of the straight winged 462 as the original design of the b-52
@juanalejandrosegura5857
@juanalejandrosegura5857 8 ай бұрын
Tupolev Tu-95 Maximum speed, 925 km/h Cruising speed: 710 km/h Autonomy 15,000 km Boeing B-52 Stratofortress Speed of 1,047 km/h Cruising speed is 844 km/h Range 14,162 km
@Baba_Yaga__
@Baba_Yaga__ 8 ай бұрын
You forgot to say that it's the only plane in the world that it can be tracked by a submarine beacause of the sound that the engines make
@OleDiaBole
@OleDiaBole 8 ай бұрын
You did not forget to show your parrot skill. 🙄 This is same kind of argument like when your side claimed how T34 was bad because it had ugly welds.
@stephmaccormick3195
@stephmaccormick3195 8 ай бұрын
Sure, kiddo. Sure.
@briansparks4926
@briansparks4926 8 ай бұрын
Heard them a couple of times during arctic deployments. Very distinctive sound.
@tatianaes3354
@tatianaes3354 8 ай бұрын
This is because the plane is the fastest propeller plane ever, so the noise is inevitable.
@Paganitzu
@Paganitzu 8 ай бұрын
Whats the opposite of a stealth bomber?
@broberts1505
@broberts1505 8 ай бұрын
Wow, the factual errors just keep getting worse.
@Manco65
@Manco65 8 ай бұрын
One correction on the B-52 with the exception of a very early prototype. No B-52 ever entered service with turboprop engines.
@idiot-cd6pl
@idiot-cd6pl 8 ай бұрын
I believe the Tu-95 is still the fastest propeller driven aircraft to have flown as some have reach 600 mph. The aircraft is very debilitating on its crew to operate, as on take-off and climb the propeller tips go supersonic, and without good sound insulation the constant sonic boom or howl often affects the crews efficient operation.
@kimmoj2570
@kimmoj2570 7 ай бұрын
@idiot-cd6pl Tu-95 and Tu-142 crews arent often influenced by prop noise. They are influenced by it EVERY flight. Their crews are deaf as 90 year old greatgrandfathers in their early 30s. Goddammit thing needs double ear protection for every crew member, but cant be done as someone might ask something on intercom. And at some level nothing can save your hearing as noise goes through bones in ear, not through ear canal itself. Norwegian F16 pilots could hear the noise what Bear makes inside their cockpits while intercepting them above Barents sea.😮
@scottkwiatkowski8472
@scottkwiatkowski8472 3 ай бұрын
Xf84 thunderscreech
@ubu852
@ubu852 8 ай бұрын
Nothing ugly about this plane IMO. Pure badassery any pilot would jump at if they had the chance.
@tonydowell9352
@tonydowell9352 8 ай бұрын
Agreed,Tu-114 documentary on the Mustard channel is awesome
@johnbaker1256
@johnbaker1256 7 ай бұрын
And the ear defenders
@AndyFromBeaverton
@AndyFromBeaverton 6 ай бұрын
@@tonydowell9352 thanks
@normmcrae1140
@normmcrae1140 8 ай бұрын
The Tu-95 is noted as one of the LOUDEST MACHINES of ANY Type ever made. The propellers break the speed of sound at cruise speed, and leave MASSIVE sonic waves.... making it EASILY trackable by SOSUS (Sonar under the ocean designed to track submarines, but easily hears the Bear from several HUNDRED miles away!). It would make a totally USELESS anti-submarine aircraft, since the Sub could HEAR IT from hundreds of miles away - giving it LOTS of time to descend or hide before the Bear could get close enough to have a CHANCE at finding the sub. I personally know several RCAF CF-18 pilots who complained about intercept missions against them because they can't hear their own jets (that they are SITTING IN!) over the the noise the Tu-95 makes! They don't need Radar to find them - they just follow the NOISE!
@TheInstructor66
@TheInstructor66 8 ай бұрын
The Republic XF-84H Thunderscreech: Hold my beer.
@cedhome7945
@cedhome7945 8 ай бұрын
Big drawback is it's so loud that British submariners can pick up from miles away (allegedly)
@OleDiaBole
@OleDiaBole 8 ай бұрын
That (alegedly) part says volumes about your knowledge. How does submarine determin altitude and direction of aircraft and its sound that passed water/air boundary... And all that with equipement not designed for that at all.
@zachfpv4493
@zachfpv4493 8 ай бұрын
​@@OleDiaBoleit would be passive sonar.
@TheWinstn60
@TheWinstn60 8 ай бұрын
I was in Russia a few years ago and a TU95 flew overhead it was incredibly loud all the car alarms in the area started going off. Not surprising since the prop tips are supersonic in flight
@paoloviti6156
@paoloviti6156 8 ай бұрын
I always understood that the Tu95 is one of the loudest turboprop ever produced possibly because of the propeller tips reaching supersonic or around it
@JasonMcCord-qk3yb
@JasonMcCord-qk3yb 8 ай бұрын
Oh yeah, they’re loud as hell. Saw one take off at an air show in Ukraine many years ago. It was louder than the jets taking off. Really different and awesome experience! It really was a fantastic experience, that I’ll never forget! It isn’t supposed to be a stealth bomber.
@proteusnz99
@proteusnz99 8 ай бұрын
What’s interesting is the propulsion system, in cruise, the props go into fairly coarse pitch, with rpm in the region of 850 rpm, so the tips are mostly subsonic, lessening drag. Think the NK-12 is still the most powerful turboprop ever built.
@Snake-ms7sj
@Snake-ms7sj 8 ай бұрын
The engines were designed by captured NAZI German scientists I believe.
@lancerevell5979
@lancerevell5979 8 ай бұрын
"Em-kay".... no. Mk is pronounced "mark".
@alexander1485
@alexander1485 8 ай бұрын
He needs to really redo this video, so many mistakes
@ACC-hs1zq
@ACC-hs1zq 6 ай бұрын
I read somewhere that it was as noisy that even the sonar of the submarines could detect it XD
@jb6027
@jb6027 8 ай бұрын
The Bear has hardly ever been "destructive" at all. It's combat role is almost nil.
@fighter5583
@fighter5583 8 ай бұрын
I wonder how many of these bombers are defunct after having been secretly stripped of their parts to make money.
@OleDiaBole
@OleDiaBole 8 ай бұрын
Oh God, another genius.
@fighter5583
@fighter5583 8 ай бұрын
@@OleDiaBole Just saying, every facet of the Russian military is suspect at this point.
@bowdonwheeler6359
@bowdonwheeler6359 8 ай бұрын
Hmm turboprop powered B 52 must have missed that one. Probably meant the B 36 although that was piston powered.
@georgebarnes8163
@georgebarnes8163 8 ай бұрын
Nope, the A.B and C models were all turboprop
@paulh4943
@paulh4943 6 ай бұрын
@@georgebarnes8163they we're not.
@georgebarnes8163
@georgebarnes8163 6 ай бұрын
@@paulh4943 you are not what?
@paulh4943
@paulh4943 6 ай бұрын
@@georgebarnes8163 autocorrect. They were not*. B52's have never been turboprops
@randywise5241
@randywise5241 8 ай бұрын
I father told me a story of the 90 mil. cannon he was on in Maryland shooting a wall of flack with their battery to stop a Bear from crossing too far into our airspace. He served in the 1950's.
@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu
@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu 8 ай бұрын
Tu95, been doing everything the B-52 can do, longer, at 1/4 the price.
@gregclewley8711
@gregclewley8711 8 ай бұрын
This series continues to make factual errors that a lot of viewers pick up - problem is how many things that are wrong do ‘we’ not pick up? The entirety of these videos is consequently factually questionable.
@bbbcfitchburg2563
@bbbcfitchburg2563 8 ай бұрын
You are definitely letting down your series of late with much inaccurate information.
@alexander1485
@alexander1485 8 ай бұрын
He just cares about that adsense money i guess
@rawdyrider
@rawdyrider 8 ай бұрын
Mach.80 for a prop a/c is bloody amazing!
@robwernet9609
@robwernet9609 3 ай бұрын
The t95s turbo props sound reminds me of what the old c5 galaxies engines sounded like.
@daveanderson3805
@daveanderson3805 7 ай бұрын
Amazing plane. And it is definitely not ugly. Also, regardless of its age, it appears to be quite capable still
@neilfoster814
@neilfoster814 7 ай бұрын
I believe the early B-52's were powered by 8x rocket engines that were stolen from the Nigerian Airforce during the Second World War by a crack Eskimo commando unit. But seriously, the Tu-95 is a pretty awesome aircraft, even if all it does is troll around getting intercepted by various countries fighter jets.
@billmullins6833
@billmullins6833 7 ай бұрын
Ah, excuse me. The Boeing B-52 WAS NOT turboprop powered. It was 100% turbojet powered. Neither was the Bristol Brabazon which was powered by Bristol Centaurus radial engines. Sloppy scholarship, people. Very sloppy!
@odysseusreturns9133
@odysseusreturns9133 8 ай бұрын
Was there a civilian version of this aircraft that was also used as presidential transport?
@rhanemann9100
@rhanemann9100 8 ай бұрын
Tu-116
@proteusnz99
@proteusnz99 8 ай бұрын
Tu-116 used the basic fuselage of Tu-95, with passenger accommodation (
@owenshebbeare2999
@owenshebbeare2999 8 ай бұрын
​@@proteusnz99True, though for its early (pre-747) operation the Tu-114 was the largest passemger aircraft flying, quite a lot larger than the 707/DC-8/Comet 4/VC-10/Il-62.
@radarmusen
@radarmusen 8 ай бұрын
With propellers it probably gives a big radar echo, long time before you hear it.
@kpadmirer
@kpadmirer 13 күн бұрын
During the Cold War, there were so many "Bears" flying around the area north of Midway Island in the Pacific that the US Navy called it "Yellowstone Park".
@Foxonian
@Foxonian 8 ай бұрын
The Tu-95 ties with the An-12 as the world's noisiest airplane still flying.
@owenshebbeare2999
@owenshebbeare2999 8 ай бұрын
*An-22. The An-12 is much smaller
@glebz7294
@glebz7294 8 ай бұрын
My grandpa was working on the NK-12 project. This engine was based on the german Jumo 022 engine. To be exact it's further development
@davidrathbone5148
@davidrathbone5148 8 ай бұрын
I stopped watching when the B52 was identified as a turboprop. Anything else cannot be trusted.
@YouTubeOdyssey
@YouTubeOdyssey 8 ай бұрын
Another from the "How to sound convincing but get most of the facts wrong" video series.
@alexchainey.
@alexchainey. 8 ай бұрын
Seemed like any Engineering aeronautical brilliance was German, lol!
@dmfraser1444
@dmfraser1444 8 ай бұрын
2:32 the commentator said the B-52 was using turboprops. Yet you can plainly see in the picture that it was equipped with pure jet engines. The B52 was never operated with turboprop engines. Jet only
@georgebarnes8163
@georgebarnes8163 8 ай бұрын
Incorrect, the first 3 variants of the aircraft all used 6 and 4 turboprop engines, the following 3 variants all used jet engines.
@dmfraser1444
@dmfraser1444 8 ай бұрын
@@georgebarnes8163 My understanding is that those were concepts that were obsoleted before they flew. The final prototype was pure jet. This was not made clear in the video. The way it is worded in the video implies the B-52 in service was a turboprop. Then while saying that the jet version that went into production is what is shown. Some early prototypes may have been made with turboprops and may even have flown but they are not what entered production. It was common then when aircraft tech was moving so fast for prototypes get scrapped and totally worked over before they could even fly.
@georgebarnes8163
@georgebarnes8163 8 ай бұрын
Not the case at all, they were produced and did enter service with a total of three A models being produced, fifty B models and thirty five C models@@dmfraser1444
@flagmichael
@flagmichael 8 ай бұрын
@@georgebarnes8163 Wikipedia says, "The first two prototypes, XB-52 and YB-52, were both powered by experimental Pratt & Whitney YJ57-P-3 turbojet engines with 8,700 pounds-force (39 kN) of static thrust each." and "The B-52A models were equipped with Pratt & Whitney J57-P-1W turbojets," and "B-52B, C, D and E models were equipped with Pratt & Whitney J57-P-29W, J57-P-29WA, or J57-P-19W series engines" Maybe you are thinking of the B-36, with six piston engines in pusher configuration and four jet engines. The most enduring legacy of the B-36 was that one accidentally dropped a hydrogen bomb near Kirtland AFB in Albuquerque, in 1957 when the bomb mount broke. The bomb was not live, but it was still mighty heavy.
@airplayn
@airplayn 7 ай бұрын
Get your facts straight. OBVIOUS to anyone is the fact that none of the planes you said used turboprops actually used them. A turboprop B-52? LOL
@frosty3693
@frosty3693 8 ай бұрын
When Nikita Khrushcev was in power in the Soviet Union he used a Bear for his transport to the UN in New York. But it took a long time for him to get out the aircraft. The TU=95's landing gear was so long no bording stairs were tall enough to reach the door. The fuselage even with the inboard engine propeller blades is armor plate. Otherwise ice that froms on the propeller blades would be thrown through the sides of the plane.
@leonidshapiro3066
@leonidshapiro3066 8 ай бұрын
It was Tu 114. Passenger version.
@owenshebbeare2999
@owenshebbeare2999 8 ай бұрын
​@@leonidshapiro3066Actually, no, that was later. The initial Tu-95 variant providing somewhat rudimentary VIP transport was the Tu-116(sic) and shared the same fuselage as the Tu-95, just with internal modifications. Entry and exit was through a rear-facing door, of which Kruschev is said to have disapproved as it looked like he was exiting the plane's ass. The Tu-114 was used when completed. One of the Tu-116 conversions is on display at Ulyanov Central Airport, though some guidebooks incorrectly say Monino, which does display other variants.
@darkknight1340
@darkknight1340 8 ай бұрын
The tu 116 at that time was so unreliable that the Russian navy strategically placed ships across the Atlantic for Kruschev's US visit,in case the aircraft was forced to ditch.Part of it's structural unreliability stemmed from Kruschev insisting that they pressurise the upper fuselage rather than just the former bomb bay area as he told the engineers that when he went to meet the US president he was damned if he was going to set foot on US soil if he had to crawl Out the arse of the aeroplane.
@proteusnz99
@proteusnz99 8 ай бұрын
The Tsar Bomba was actually de-rated to it’s 57Mt yield, the basic design was good for 100Mt, but that was felt to be non-survivable for the delivery aircraft. The rest of the world didn’t hold its breath, no one outside those involved in the operation until the bang. Then everyone knew, the shockwave when round the world twice, and products were air-sampled over the next few months. A Singularly useless weapon, as even the Tu-95 has a very limited range/performance carrying the thing, as someone termed it “good for bombing the boundaries of its own airfield.”, but then the “Biggest” of anything seems to fascinate Russians (and Texans?)
@atomicskull6405
@atomicskull6405 7 ай бұрын
Basically they replaced the third fission stage with a lead dummy. As designed it was a fission -> fusion -> fission device, the neutrons from the second hydrogen stage were used to create fast fission in a third uranium stage. This was of plain uranium metal, it didn't need to be enriched uranium because the massive amount of neutrons from the second stage would almost completely fission it and generate as much energy as the first and second stages combined.
@operating
@operating 8 ай бұрын
Ok. Who made the decision to have background music like this??? It’s so annoying. Click off.
@Waldtyr1
@Waldtyr1 8 ай бұрын
Of all the videos. This one starts with a metal tune. Nice!
@stuartwoolley1442
@stuartwoolley1442 8 ай бұрын
2 m45secs facts, facts, facts need to be actually accurate.
@user-ko7nk9pc9t
@user-ko7nk9pc9t 3 ай бұрын
Awesome lconic gathering of the worlds best !
@barryscott6222
@barryscott6222 8 ай бұрын
14:10 There is no turn of the tides.
@jiggermole
@jiggermole 8 ай бұрын
Maybe dial back the mixing on the background music. It's hard to pick out the voice at points through the vid.
@P51F86F4F15F22
@P51F86F4F15F22 Ай бұрын
God damn, I know this channel messes up on info every now and then but the B-52 was an easy given
@atomicskull6405
@atomicskull6405 7 ай бұрын
Tsar Bomba was a three stage fission -> fusion -> fission device The neutrons generated by the second hydrogen bomb stage were used to induce fast fission in a third stage of plain (not enriched) uranium metal.
@rcollinge325
@rcollinge325 8 ай бұрын
The music is very distracting.
@alexander1485
@alexander1485 8 ай бұрын
The video has many mistakes
@oxcart4172
@oxcart4172 8 ай бұрын
Well, I think it looks cool!
@levischittlord6558
@levischittlord6558 8 ай бұрын
Today Western engine manufacturers are testing unshrouded high bypass turbofans when Russia has been doing it all of this time.
@goofyleo3869
@goofyleo3869 5 ай бұрын
Maybe. But we get it right. Russia doesn't.
@ernestkomu4523
@ernestkomu4523 8 ай бұрын
What song is playing in the background?
@jodragon8118
@jodragon8118 8 ай бұрын
the TU-95 is the sexiest thing with wings
@ColonelEviscerator
@ColonelEviscerator 8 ай бұрын
The B-52 has some words to share with you.
@owenshebbeare2999
@owenshebbeare2999 8 ай бұрын
Settle down, Princess, go make your own video if you can do better.
@tonydowell9352
@tonydowell9352 8 ай бұрын
@@owenshebbeare2999 agreed…
@robertcamble3543
@robertcamble3543 2 ай бұрын
The bear is the only swept wing plane built with propeller engines
@Schaneification
@Schaneification 8 ай бұрын
LOL SORRY THE TITLE IS JUST FUNNY ! B-52 came out at the same time and was so so much better !
@peterkucia2890
@peterkucia2890 8 ай бұрын
personally, I thought this vid would focus more on the bomb than the plane
@sparky4878
@sparky4878 8 ай бұрын
I was thinking that too. But there are some good videos on the bomb. Apparently they scaled it down from the original intended capacity.
@Ubique2927
@Ubique2927 8 ай бұрын
4:56... Is that a lightning?
@gravesclayton3604
@gravesclayton3604 7 ай бұрын
The U.S. "Skyshark" also had gearbox problems with its twin contra-rotating props. In 2 test flight failures, the gearbox & props left the aircraft entirely, the 1st incident killing the test pilot. The second time this happened, the pilot successfully landed with a canopy covered in oil, and the engine, still running full blast, driving nothing. I don't believe it flew again after that flight.
@smac1706
@smac1706 7 ай бұрын
Ummm the B52 is certainly NOT powered by turbo props? What the heck? Do you not preview your videos and fact check them before you post? Extremely disappointing....😮🤦
@henrypena2547
@henrypena2547 8 ай бұрын
One of My Favs
@wayneneher6362
@wayneneher6362 5 ай бұрын
The B-52??? Bristol Brabazon??? Neither of them ran turboprop engines.
@Watson1
@Watson1 8 ай бұрын
There are so many mistakes in this episode that you need to go back and start over. Plus get rid of the bad loud music. Goodness what is the world coming to.
@Kroggnagch
@Kroggnagch 2 ай бұрын
What's the difference between a piston engine aircraft and turbo-pop aircraft? I've never understood cause aren't they both just propeller drive?
@flickingbollocks5542
@flickingbollocks5542 8 ай бұрын
It's a beautiful plane.
@ThePoodleStrudel
@ThePoodleStrudel 8 ай бұрын
You really gotta stop it with the hard rock background music, so distracting.
@hellfire08
@hellfire08 8 ай бұрын
how many more times are you going to change the title and thumbnail on this video? This is at least the third revision I saw 🤡
@rdmgwinn
@rdmgwinn 8 ай бұрын
I can attest to it's noise. It sets off car alarms more then an SR71 and I thought the SR was loud..
@namvet_13e
@namvet_13e 8 ай бұрын
Neither the B52, nor any other American strategic bomber used turboprop engines. The Hercules cargo airplane, however, does.
@Innerspace100
@Innerspace100 8 ай бұрын
And the Lockheed Electra derived P3 Orion, allthough that one is now being fazed out in favour of the Boeing 737-800 derived P8 Poseidon.
@georgebarnes8163
@georgebarnes8163 8 ай бұрын
the first 3 variants of the B-52 all used turboprop engines , the following 3 variants all used jet engines,
@flagmichael
@flagmichael 8 ай бұрын
@@georgebarnes8163 I dunno. Wikipedia says, "The B-52A models were equipped with Pratt & Whitney J57-P-1W turbojets," "B-52B, C, D and E models were equipped with Pratt & Whitney J57-P-29W, J57-P-29WA, or J57-P-19W series engines" and the National Air and Space Museum says "In April 1952, the prototype Boeing B-52 flew for the first time powered by eight J57 turbojet engines."
@georgebarnes8163
@georgebarnes8163 8 ай бұрын
look further back than the A variants@@flagmichael
@rafchris
@rafchris 8 ай бұрын
Stopped watching after 3 mins. B52 with turboprops??? Im out
@josephboyce4522
@josephboyce4522 2 ай бұрын
In the initial design phase, a six prop was considered.
@flashgordon3715
@flashgordon3715 7 ай бұрын
It's ugly but kinda grows on you
@SWright1978
@SWright1978 8 ай бұрын
Great video, as usual. It would be nice if you could ask your kids upstairs to turn down their stereo because the microphone is picking up some of the music making it hard to focus on what you’re saying.
@occamsrayzor
@occamsrayzor 8 ай бұрын
Please stop with the tedious heavy metal music on these videos. It's very distracting and unnecessary.
@scottvanessendelft408
@scottvanessendelft408 8 ай бұрын
I just watched this video... In the 1980's we use to laugh at this thing when it flew over the flight deck of the USS Nimitz with it's bombay doors open and twp F-14's "escorting" it away from the ship... Not sure I would laugh at it anymore, would hate to be on the recieving end on any of it's ordinance.
@Original50
@Original50 7 ай бұрын
Why so much power? Avionics? Less-efficient on-board systems? Transporter-room requirements?
@Ubique2927
@Ubique2927 8 ай бұрын
Wrong title for the wrong plane. This title is for the Vulcan.
@einautofan6685
@einautofan6685 7 ай бұрын
One of the most beautiful and most powerful Turboprop aircrafts ever!!! The engines were mostly german engineered!😉😎👌
@stevefairbanks835
@stevefairbanks835 8 ай бұрын
Just a slow noisy moving target
@Xilley1
@Xilley1 5 ай бұрын
It literally is the fastest turboprop aircraft ever built.
@MrTimfin
@MrTimfin 7 ай бұрын
The Bristol Brittania was a Vickers Viscount... 😉
@turkey0165
@turkey0165 8 ай бұрын
This video must be intended for the European markets. It's, in metric, and the United States does not use the metric system! Other than that, the TU95 is more Obsolete than the equally obsolete Boeing B-52 ! The day of a manned bomer is ridiculous!
@teslapilotcheapreviews8490
@teslapilotcheapreviews8490 8 ай бұрын
Beautiful Photo @7:47 !
@kevinphillips9408
@kevinphillips9408 8 ай бұрын
What an amazing aircraft
@leecluster3437
@leecluster3437 8 ай бұрын
Not really a fan, and I haven’t even watched the entire video yet. There are certainly aircraft more destructive than the Tupolev 95. I hate it when this channel uses clickbait titles on their videos, which is always.
@BBCharger5spd
@BBCharger5spd 8 ай бұрын
I believe the intent was to showcase that the Tu-95 has dropped the Tsar bomba - which was the most destructive man-made explosion in history.
@BanjoVie
@BanjoVie 8 ай бұрын
Since when was a B52 a turboprop and I'd hardly call the SR Princess iconic! Only one ever flew!
@briansparks4926
@briansparks4926 Ай бұрын
Heard the prop noise on sonar back in the day but I haven't seen a B-52 of any model with props. Your research needs re-worked on this episode otherwise appreciate what you do.
@maikromm
@maikromm 8 ай бұрын
Maybe this has been covered but how does he crank out these videos so quickly? Quality beats quantity and it feels like these are being cranked out by chat gpt
@xxmrrickxx
@xxmrrickxx 8 ай бұрын
You will find many are literally a narration of wikipedia articles and random video clips that aren’t even showing the aircraft described. I’m unsubscribing after this one.
@maikromm
@maikromm 8 ай бұрын
@@xxmrrickxxyep I’m out
@stefannicolaescu294
@stefannicolaescu294 5 ай бұрын
Most Beautiful!? No. Beautiful yes
@duffer2307
@duffer2307 4 ай бұрын
Its Russia's B52 Built right the first time, hard to improve on, adapts to future weapons.
@btrdangerdan2010
@btrdangerdan2010 8 ай бұрын
The military version of my favorite airplane the tu-114
@tonydowell9352
@tonydowell9352 8 ай бұрын
Mine too Go watch the Mustard video on the 114,I’m building a contrail 1/72 vacuform kit and it (though it’s an airliner ,dwarfs my monogram b-52d and Ertl kc-135 in the same scale).b -52 got it on wingspan though-
@Olleetheowl
@Olleetheowl 8 ай бұрын
Did I miss something? Since when was a B52 a turbo prop?
@jeffreymckie3328
@jeffreymckie3328 4 ай бұрын
Extremely radar reflective. Extremely noisy to the point it can be heard from great distances.
@scottkwiatkowski8472
@scottkwiatkowski8472 3 ай бұрын
Russia needs less ww2 era aircraft in its modern fleet, things have changed.
@alexanderleslie4226
@alexanderleslie4226 8 ай бұрын
Thoroughly unimpressed!!
@DavyRo
@DavyRo 8 ай бұрын
😂😅😂 Buthurt American by any chance? Ya know what, sometimes you have to realise you're not as fantastic as you believe you are. Sometimes it's OK if your military hardware isn't the best in every single area. Sometimes it's best to be humble as arrogance comes before a fall. I bet you're not impressed with a single piece of Russian hardware & believe just because something costs so much money. It doesn't mean it's the best. I'm from a NATO country, but I have the sense to research many different opinions from many different points of view. I know the worst thing any military can do is underestimate it's enemy. My country has got a list as long as your arm, in the militaries it's defeated by itself. You can't name 1 single military you've defeated by yourself. Your arrogance is misplaced & comes from Hollywood & propaganda & not reality.
@alexanderleslie4226
@alexanderleslie4226 8 ай бұрын
@@DavyRo We've actually fought in wars the last 20 years we ARE the best FACT win or lose the death ratio is unheard of russias the ultimate paper tiger I'm delighted a tiny country like Ukraine pulled your pants down!!!
@alexanderleslie4226
@alexanderleslie4226 8 ай бұрын
@@DavyRo And yes russian hardware is 2nd rate!!
@Mtlmshr
@Mtlmshr 8 ай бұрын
The Russian version of the U.S. B-52 both very long lasting bombers
@RolfSAMA
@RolfSAMA 8 ай бұрын
Hly crap, plz drop the music for your next vids.
@40over86
@40over86 Ай бұрын
Great video. But there has been no turning of the tides in Ukraine.
@Black_0pCar0lina
@Black_0pCar0lina 8 ай бұрын
Do they pay taxes in Russia? I know we spend a lot of tax $ here on fuel alone for military drills.
@TalkieToaster.
@TalkieToaster. 8 ай бұрын
Most Russians live in abject poverty, so I doubt it. Not sure about the larger towns and cities that tend to be where all the money and education is.
@Black_0pCar0lina
@Black_0pCar0lina 8 ай бұрын
@TalkieToaster. probably why they have so many defectors. No benefit to signing up, just forced into it.
@TalkieToaster.
@TalkieToaster. 8 ай бұрын
@@Black_0pCar0lina At first people from the really poor areas jumped at the chance to enlist as they were being offered what to them was a years salary for a few months on the front, but that obviously never happened and they weren't allowed to go home. It's pretty tragic really, they only took a small percentage of conscripts from places like Moscow, St Petersburg etc, they were mostly all from the slums and prisons.
@piyushprakash7020
@piyushprakash7020 8 ай бұрын
I agree with Bharat stand
@tony9146
@tony9146 7 ай бұрын
This channel is falling apart. Just uploading a mass amount of content that is full of errors and sounds like it was written by ChatGPT. Anytime channels go to quantity vs quality they suffer.
@VinceVilmosToth-bb6rg
@VinceVilmosToth-bb6rg 8 ай бұрын
3:35-3:40 showed a TU-20.
The Airplane that Caught a U-2 at 65,000 Feet
15:37
Dark Skies
Рет қаралды 338 М.
Tu-114 - the most Soviet airliner in the world
26:32
Skyships Eng
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
Pool Bed Prank By My Grandpa 😂 #funny
00:47
SKITS
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
Jumping off balcony pulls her tooth! 🫣🦷
01:00
Justin Flom
Рет қаралды 34 МЛН
女孩妒忌小丑女? #小丑#shorts
00:34
好人小丑
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
How I Did The SELF BENDING Spoon 😱🥄 #shorts
00:19
Wian
Рет қаралды 35 МЛН
The Rare B-29 Exterminator That Shocked the US
14:56
Dark Skies
Рет қаралды 97 М.
The Gunship Bomber that Tore Open the Sky
13:13
Dark Skies
Рет қаралды 372 М.
Experts Reveal What Really Happened (Full Episode) | Area 51: The CIA's Secret
44:25
The Terrible Plane Kept Falling Like a Comet
13:34
Dark Skies
Рет қаралды 93 М.
The Plane that Only Real Pilots Could Fly
14:04
Dark Skies
Рет қаралды 191 М.
The Plane that No One Dared to Face
11:38
Dark Skies
Рет қаралды 383 М.
Germany's Most Mysterious Anti-Betrayal Plane
13:25
Dark Skies
Рет қаралды 227 М.
How did Ukraine Invasion of Russia Happened?
10:41
AiTelly
Рет қаралды 922 М.
The Truth About the Memphis Belle (No Hollywood)
49:45
TJ3 History
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
Pool Bed Prank By My Grandpa 😂 #funny
00:47
SKITS
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН