I wouldn't call it a 'small' mistake 🤣

That's what they want you to believe.

I thought I had entered a different fork in the multiverse. Glad it’s still Michael Collins

@@benjamindover4337 and the earth is flat, isn't it?

@@lukafilm I wanted to be polite

benparnell332. That's because the Soviets were miles ahead of us in the Space Race. About 25 USA rockets exploded on take off then 3 Astronauts were burnt to death in their capsule. Neil Armstrong narrowly escaped with his life when the Moon landing test vehicle went out of control and crashed !!! From then on nothing went wrong. That's because the only way to get to the Moon was to fake it !!!! Nobody could track or see a Rocket actually travelling to the Moon !!!! You can hardly see a Lockheed U2 with a pair of Binoculars at 90,000 ft so how are you going to see a Rocket 250,000 miles away ?????

@@giveaway_texts thats the literal most obvius scam I have seen in my entire life

The Charlie Duke comment has to have been on purpose.

Mockery.

Fully agree, but it is sad that he feels he has to do it....what ever but both these mistakes ( the other being that Armstrong was a Navy aviator and not Air Force) is a "turn-off" for me

You're telling me that you're declaring something to be fake but you don't understand the workings if the Apollo Guidance Computer or the IBM System/360 mainframe on the ground? Seriously?

No they didn't - The spacecraft computers had a performance comparable to the first generation of personal computers like the Apple 2 and Commodore 64 (the guidance computer had RAM of 4KB, and a 32KB hard disk). They were only required to take large amounts of numerical data and organise it into a more useful format. That original data was calculated by the main frames at NASA, and then beamed up to the spacecraft by radio telescope at the rate of 1,200 bits per second. They did not need the power for touch screens or to hold graphics etc like today’s smartphones.

he was capcom.

They dropped saying "L-E-M" as well, shorting it to "L-M".

@@michaelmcglynn5863 Thank you.I don't remember that, but I heard lem all the time during those amazing television broadcasts. I was born in the mid 1950s and was in elementary school during Mercury. Our classes stopped when there was a launch, and we either all had a television brought into class, or piled into the school auditorium to watch it live. If you're a baby boomer like me, you'll remember how all three television networks stopped their regular fare of game shows or soap operas to broadcast these historic events. Everywhere in the planet, except for the Soviet block countries, the day stopped, or the night as it was in Europe. Those images were broadcast world-wide in real time, or as they said then, "live". It amazes me that there are people who spend time to create content here on KZfaq, use technology that Arthur Clarke called "magic" in that era, to deny the achievements of the past. The irony of someone using a modern personal computer to mix high-res digital video that they captured on a pocket cell phone, to build a video presentation that denies the 1960's race to the moon, is striking. Where do they think the electronic technology in their cell phone came from? Perhaps the miniature gigabits of memory on LPDDR packages in their phone just sprung into being somewhere in the Silicon Valley, or maybe China, during this century?

*_"That film is Ridiculous !!!!"_* Here we go then... *_"Neil Armstrong jumps from the Ladder, when he has no idea what the surface was like !!!!"_* No he didn't, having jumped onto the landing pad from the ladder, he insured that he could jump back up. He then gently stepped onto the surface off the foot of the lander. *_"He could have fallen down a bottomless hole full of dust !!!!"_* Unlikely given that a lunar lander that was 17.9 ft. tall 14.0 ft in diameter with a landing gear span of 29.75 ft and a mass of 15103 kg that he was stepping from hadn't, it was a fair assumption that he wouldn't either. *_"You would think he would have had a safety rope attaching himself to the Moon Lander !!!!"_* Armstrong was attached to the LM when he descended the ladder and made his first steps using the LEC as a tether/safety line. *_"But of course it was all filmed in the Arizona Desert !!!!"_* The Arizona desert is it now? What about Death Valley, or the Utah desert? Or Cannon AFB New Mexico? Area 51 Nevada? Devon Island Canada? Hollywood or even Shepperton UK? You goons can't even get your stories straight. I guess it depends upon which conspiracy theorist you allow yourself to be duped by.

@@yassassin6425 Area 51 is the only place where you will be shot on site and Russian Satellites have Shown Moon Craters and film Studios. As usual, you are talking a load of Rubbish !!! Do you think they would film the Moon Landings in Yosemite !!!!

@@spaceted3977 *_"Area 51 is the only place where you will be shot on site"_* You said the Arizona desert, Area 51 is in Groom Lake, Nevada. *_"and Russian Satellites have Shown Moon Craters and film Studios."_* Source? Evidence? Meanwhile the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) SELENE lunar probe has imaged the actual landing sites that correspond exactly with the selenic coordinates, and which have also been captured by India's Chadrayaan-2 orbiter which photographed the Apollo 11 Lunar Module Eagle descent stage (the orbiter's image of the Apollo landing site was released to the public on September 3, 2021). They were also confirmed by China's second lunar probe, Chang'e 2. Yet you completely disregard this. *_"As usual, you are talking a load of Rubbish !!!"_* The irony, was it intentional? *_"Do you think they would film the Moon Landings in Yosemite !!!!"_* I'll repeat what I sad to you, because either you are incredibly dim, or lack the necessary levels of comprehension: "The Arizona desert is it now? What about Death Valley, or the Utah desert? Or Cannon AFB New Mexico? Area 51 Nevada? Devon Island Canada? Hollywood or even Shepperton UK? You goons can't even get your stories straight. I guess it depends upon which conspiracy theorist you allow yourself to be duped by." Meaning that you people are always making contradictory statements. Which is it? Area 51? A hangar in an airfrorce base? or a Hollywood Studio? You need to get your stories straight. I also notice that like any conspiracy theorist you have completely disregarded my responses to you in respect of the nonsense that you typed regarding Armstrong's first steps on the moon. Do you just make this up as you go along?

Rocket exhaust gasses expand much more quickly after leaving the engine nozzle in a vacuum than in an atmosphere and because there is no air resistance on the Moon, the blast deflected the dust sideways in a straight line at high speed - far too fast to settle on the LM’s feet.

What?

*_"The fact that a speech had already been filmed showing the President announcing that the crew were trapped on the Moon proves that it was not live !!!!"_* What? No it doesn't. It simply demonstrates that there was a contingency in place should the mission had claimed the lives of the Apollo 11 crew. *_"As it turned out the successful Film Version was shown and the disaster version was Binned !!!!"_* Incorrect. All of the Apollo missions were transmitted live and in real time. This was impossible to fake. *_"The entire Moon landing was filmed using huge plaster models of the Moon, and the real Moon Lander filmed on Earth !!!!"_* Got to say though, that must be some studio to convincingly replicate 1/6 th gravity and the vacuum of the lunar surface - not to mention the precise 'plaster' reconstruction of Theophilus in The Sea of Tranquility; the Head Crater vicinity, Ocean of Storms; the Fra Mauro Formation near Cone Crater; the eastern edge of Mare Imbrium, Hadley Rille; The Descartes Highlands; and the eastern edge of Mare Serenitati in the Taurus Littrow Valley. Shout out to the props department too, that managed to fashion fake moonrock consistent which each of those six landing sites and collectively dupe an entire branch of science called geology for over half a century in the process. Did they use 'plaster' for that too? *_"The film was distributed around the World, It wasn't beamed to people's TV Sets."_* So every TV network nation on earth was complicit and collectively coerced by this supposed global hoax? Incidentally you'll find anything that is shown on television needed to be 'beamed' to it, irrespective of whether it is live or recorded. *_"They were incompatible and were made up of different amounts of lines on the Screens."_* What? Are you talking about different systems such as PAL and NTSC? Live broadcasts were/are converted into the frame rate by the broadcaster.

No, it proves that they knew in advance that the loss of the crew was a possibility. Which, for a mission as risky as this, it was.

If the missions was fake, why did they have a speech prepared in case of a failure?

"The fact that a speech had already been filmed showing the President announcing that the crew were trapped on the Moon proves that it was not live." I think that a speech had been written rather than filmed, but please explain how you come to that conclusion from that premise.

@@Stubrit I was 17 years old in 1969 so I remember all about it !!! You are relying on what you have been told which is circumstantial evidence which counts for nothing in a court of law.

What in particular are you doubting?

You can't even spell his name you goon.

That's the conspiracy theorists that you worship at the altar of completely screwed then .

Nope - there is no single 'official narrative'. All six Apollo landings are supported by scientific, independent and third party evidence which has a voice of its own.

im going to bet you do not have any proof of it being a hoax in the slightest

CAP

On the contrary, there were nine manned missions to the moon and six landings. It would have been at least ten had it not been for the near catastrophe and aborted landing of Apollo 13 and the premature cancellation of the programme and with it, Apollo 18, 19 and 20. Hope this helps.

And you’re too thick and lazy to offer any evidence…period.

Is that cause the earth is fllllaaaaaaatttt

That's online conspiracy theory for you I'm afraid.

Yet you’re unable to offer any evidence for your position.