I am having similar issues. Total lift results in the range of 340lbs for an aircraft that in other simulation put out 1250lbs. Further, my simulations always seem to come out linear, IE there isnt an angle of attack change step/time as I inputted (same as in this video).

hi, could you please explain a bit more in order to make it more clear in my mind. plus, did you find any solution to your problem? consider that im a high school student :)

@@mustafatalip1 Sorry if my explanation was a bit messy. Force Y only equals to lift when the angle of attack (AOA) is zero, and the same for force X and the drag. By definition, lift is perpendicular to the airflow. If we do it as in the video, we rotate the airflow, not the model, thus the force Y remains perpendicular to the model's longitudinal axis, not the airflow. In order to get Y alined with the lift. AOA shall remain zero, and we should rotate the model, either in the part or in the assembly. We can also do it as it is described in the video, but then we have to calculate the lift and the drags by trigonometric functions as follows: L=Ycos(AOA)+Xsin(AOA)... D=Ysin(AOA)+Xcos(AOA). But I prefer rotating the part because it is easier and more accurate simulationwise.

@@Jwmbike14 I noticed your reply a little late I guess. You don't have enough iteration/AOA change. I think this method only works with a stupid powerful work station. It is possible to set the iteration in relation to time in the simulation, but even if I set it correctly, it starts to give realistic values after few degrees and it consumes a crazy amount of time. I had the most realistic values by measuring the parameters at each AOA separately. And I usually set the AOA zero in the simulation and changed the AOA within the part with a "move/copy bodies" operation. That also slightly increased simulation accuracy in my experience.

@@kristofnagy5829 appreciated sir, it all makes sense right now. actually i didnt thought that you're going to reply. thanks once again. anyway, i have one more question. when you make rotational adjustments through move/copy bodies, is velocity that has given by us while creating simulation be like through fore plane of the aircraft or through Z-axis? in order to make it more clear, here is the photo: imgur. com/a/piveJUq does velocity goes as line A or B? I've accidently type point instead line, sorry. P.S: please delete the gap inbetween dot and com. I am trying to get over the youtube algorithm which counts links as spam. have a nice day/night or whatever is your clock.

If you prefer to avoid trigonometry we presented an alternate workflow in this newer webinar, where we pitch the geometry of the aircraft using a Parametric Study. This uses a series of separate steady state projects rather than a time-dependent study. hawkridgesys.com/blog/predicting-lift-and-drag-with-solidworks-and-simulia- Otherwise the equation used here was something like the below: -{SG Force (Z) 1}*cos({Initial and Ambient Conditions:Angle of attack:< Dependency >})+{SG Force (Y) 1}*sin({Initial and Ambient Conditions:Angle of attack:< Dependency >}) Note that you should use your own discretion and verify appropriate directions and angles for your geometry.

The computational domain and mesh settings were likely simplified for the purposes of this example. In practice you should try to determine convergence by experimenting with these parameters. Lift and drag calculations are particularly sensitive to mesh refinement but should be well validated for most cases in SOLIDWORKS Flow Simulation. You can find a validation example of an airfoil here: www.solidworks.com/sw/docs/Flow_Validation_Methodology-Whitepaper.pdf Placing a local mesh with "equidistant refinement" enabled will create the closest thing to an "inflation layer" around the aerodynamic body, allowing to capture refinement around the aerodynamic body with minimal number of mesh cells. There's an updated video tutorial on setting up a simple aerodynamic study using this process here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/htyfqLaBvNXZpJs.html Covered in this webinar is an alternate approach to varying angle of attack using Parametric study: hawkridgesys.com/blog/predicting-lift-and-drag-with-solidworks-and-simulia- All this being said in typical operating regions we would expect SOLIDWORKS Flow Simulation to be highly accurate for L/D calculations with the proper refinements. In near-stall regions or other separated flows accuracy may be expected to decrease, but it really would vary on a case-by-case basis. We have other SIMULIA tools such as Fluid Dynamics Engineer and SIMULIA XFlow which have more advanced turbulence models for that would cover these situations. Hope this helps!

@@hawkridgesystems Thank you so much for such an informative reply.

Solidworks simulation works well for early iteration because the workflow is simple and it needs less demanding computing power which mean faster simulation. but if you need more accurate and advance simulation it's better to use dedicated CAE/CFD software (Ansys/Abaqus).