The World's Longest And More: Singapore Airlines' 5 Longest Routes In July 2023

Рет қаралды 57,294

Жыл бұрын

When it comes to flying lengthy non-stop services, Star Alliance member Singapore Airlines is perhaps one of the most experienced carriers. Over the past two decades, this airline has been operating the world’s longest service on and off for a cumulative period of approximately 13 years. Indeed, it has given up the title twice due to service suspensions and cancelations. With North America as one of its focus regions, we examine the longest flights operated by Singapore Airlines in July 2023.
Our Social Media:
/ simpleflyin. .
/ simple_flying
/ simpleflying. .
Our Website
simpleflying.com/
For copyright matters please contact us at: legal@valnetinc.com

Пікірлер: 63

@get2dachoppa249 Жыл бұрын

In a twist on this theme, a few months ago, I flew SQ's shortest A350 route from KUL back to SIN over the Eid holiday. I spoke to the FA about the NYC routes since I'm a native NYer, and I was glad to hear that the crew has 3 days off on this route, and they stay at a hotel in the city, as opposed to one in NJ.

@yungcotter Жыл бұрын

Yup they stay in mid-town, I actually ran into my flight attendant a few days after my flight back as I work in the area.

@mrcannotfindaname Жыл бұрын

The episode is basically SIA episode

@sainnt Жыл бұрын

I've flown the Singapore to Newark route. It was amazing!

@EpicThe112 Жыл бұрын

For Singapore Airlines there is a $1200 ticket available for SQ21 EWR-SIN provided the final destination is MNL. Since SQ918 leaves Singapore for Manila Philippines 2 hours after the arrival of SQ21 from EWR. Also Perth Western Australia on SQ225

@Ananth8193 Жыл бұрын

Awesome video 🎉🎉

@loosegoosehahaha Жыл бұрын

great vid

@Vicstarz26 Жыл бұрын

Air Canada now operates YVR - SIN 4 times weekly which is exciting. AC mainline will be launching other long haul routes which is needed for Canada 🙌🏼

@tyinyvr Жыл бұрын

Last month Air Canada announced it will start a 4 time weekly year-round service from YVR to SIN on their 787's in April 24

@anonymousdice Жыл бұрын

Unfair! I posted the exact same vid a year ago and it barely got a fraction of the views as this video got in 3 days. Anyway, you guys are the aviation news channel I always go to, keep grinding!

@two6520 Жыл бұрын

For once a good video. Good job!

@NYCLight Жыл бұрын

What is SQ1 city pair now that it is no longer serves the SFO->HKG->SIN routing??

@pantsri Жыл бұрын

You forgot to mention SIN - MAN - IAH is SQ52 one of their longest routes as well. However, good report still.

@keirrobinson4156 10 ай бұрын

Not nonstop though, which the 5 in the video are.

@shengkunlin5658 6 ай бұрын

I flew to IAH and when I landed the first thing I said was, Singapore airlines operates here?

@Sacto1654 Жыл бұрын

Personally, I think for these very long flights, the seating should be Premium Economy and Business Class *ONLY* . Reason: the need to reduce incidences of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT). That's why I suggested the Qantas A350-1000's used on the _Project Sunrise_ fligthts should be the type of seating I suggested earlier.

@Sedna063 Жыл бұрын

But what is the incidence of DVT in flight though?

@sidv4615 Жыл бұрын

Can you believe it? Qantas went for 33 inches in their economy class, even a random airline like air India which has much shorter routes has 34 inches in their regular economy on their 777-200LR

@IWFRAY Жыл бұрын

Both Seattle and SFO are 13583 km away from Singapore lol 😊

@juniorcampbell2980 Жыл бұрын

I am flying the SIN/JFK leg later this year. Really looking forward to it.

@jamiebrowne6913 Жыл бұрын

How long can the ULR fly with a full load to capacity of people and cargo

@NguyenHuy-gl3oy Жыл бұрын

The payload of the -900 and -900ULR is the same until 8500nm. In fact, the former could fly to New York with a 100% load factor and very little cargo, and was initially used on the route to JFK before the ULR took over.

@wadehiggins1114 Жыл бұрын

@NguyenHuy-gl3oy he asked a simple question. He needed a simple answer. You still haven't given him an answer.

@heidirabenau511 Жыл бұрын

Extra fuel tanks and increased MTOW helps the aircraft fly 18,000KM.

@NguyenHuy-gl3oy Жыл бұрын

@@wadehiggins1114Well, with a full payload of about 53t, it could cover a max distance of 6000nm.

@ProAvgeek6328 Жыл бұрын

over 20 hours

@tomer.aviation Жыл бұрын

Will try to fly singapore-JFK next summer

@EC4U2C_Studioz 11 ай бұрын

I hope Singapore Airlines can add a non-stop flight to Washington DC (Dulles).

@dodoubleg2356 Жыл бұрын

11,163mi. for the A350-900ULR. Is that statute or nautical miles?? Either way it's impressive, just curious. 😉✌️✈️

@eamonahern7495 Жыл бұрын

Statute I'd say. A Nautical mile is a minute, as in 60 minutes in a degree. So 60 Nautical miles is one degree of rotation along the earth's curvature. That's my understanding of what a Nautical mile is.

@dodoubleg2356 Жыл бұрын

@eamonahern7495 thx for the reply my friend. I still need to get a better understanding of what u just explained, but I'm SLOWLY getting more versed in it, ha. 😉✈️👍✌️

@stevenholt1867 Жыл бұрын

Beat the Dreamliner.

@4150QE Жыл бұрын

why Singapore airline discontinue to fly Vancouver again ? Canadian market is too small ? not enough passenger ?

@syafiqrizuan5588 Жыл бұрын

I guess SQ has not a good timing for arrival and departure in YVR. The route has a good load factor and yield as well as almost seats are fully booked. AC will replace SQ on SIN-YVR route next year.

@Avishek85 Жыл бұрын

Why one flight to EWR and one to JFK? Why not both to same airport? Slot restrictions?

@reichenyoo597 Жыл бұрын

I guess there are connect domestic flights at JFK…

@cabottaxi Жыл бұрын

If these aircraft were ever to come on the market they would be snapped up.

@johniii8147 Жыл бұрын

I avoid these ULH routes. I prefer a stop over.

@nick..2387 Жыл бұрын

We want this type of video on AIR INDIA 🇮🇳

@mr.b292 Жыл бұрын

Too bad about the loss of the YVR route. I had the fortune of flying it in May.

@wadehiggins1114 Жыл бұрын

The A350 is the aircraft boeing wished they could replicate.

@jamiebrowne6913 Жыл бұрын

Not really, Airbus always tends to be a reactive company, the A350 is the answer to the 777 although it was made as a reaction to the 787. Boeing was always in the business of carrying more ppl and cargo to almost the same distance as the Airbus jets that carry less. The difference is the Airbus is lighter and has slightly more efficient engines so it burns less fuel. Yet sales of the 777-300ER alone are more than the entire Airbus 350 program both models.

@atid42 Жыл бұрын

Thats good and all but Airbus are safer and the A350 has been flying for years now, meanwhile, The 787 has been grounded more times that a disciplined child 🤷‍♀️ Airbus>Boeing

@wadehiggins1114 Жыл бұрын

@jamiebrowne6913 When was the 777 program introduced? When was the A350 program introduced? Clearly, you do not know anything! Don't even mention the A330NEO and nightmareliner. That also was launched before the NEO.

@Jabid21 Жыл бұрын

77W has decades of head start. And guess what are replacing those aging 777s? It’s not 777x

@jamiebrowne6913 Жыл бұрын

@@Jabid21 it hasn't passed 20 years since the second generation came about and ppl aren't replacing 777's they are still being kept, the only things the Airbus are replacing are other airbuses. The 777x numbers will pickup as it's certified and proven once the 77W are aged out.