Step 2: Forget the movie and write a long article about how the movie sucks because of random reasons.

Step 3: ????

Step 3: use logic established in other, completely unrelated movies, for basis of what would make sense. Even though it completely goes against the logic established in the movie you're talking about.

@@pira8ted641 "...and impose some bullshit ideologies that have nothing to do with the movie"

@@jamiee7367Step Profit 4: Profit

I like how they logically think earth is the most valuable planet in the mcu

Blake Demers I agree also it wasn’t just earth that lost half the population It’s was also those aliens who suffered

@@artofcujo It`s even funnier because in Avengers they already state that the universe (or atleast The Crew of Thanos) thought that Earth is weak and the Gotg didn`t even know it exists (and I think they know a lot of planets)

This actually made me legit lol

Also there is a large chance a lot of those villains got dusted as well.

I can't believe Back To The Future violates the laws of time travel clearly explained in Donnie Darko.

Also the Doctor Who comparison doesn't even work there's like a ton of episodes where the Doctor works together with past versions of themselves

@@lonesavior lmao

It's like they legitimately forgot that it's a fictional (or at best, theoretical) concept.

Right. Thanks how film criticism works. How can you criticize a Kubrick film for not being like a better Hitchcock film its not even in the same franchise ... smh ... the fact that people liked this comment shows Jay may not attract the most alt-right audience but he has for himself the dumbest audience imaginable ...

it's literally just "i had a dream you cheated on me so now im dumping you'

​@@toplayDA_that girlfriend is then an idiot

@@who-ny5oe Yeah that's what I said

Die Hard?

@@lacari0805 no that's not one

Honestly trying to apply human logic to time travel is ridiculous it's like applying human logic to quantum mechanics the universe is under no obligation to make logical sense to our tiny ape brains there's literally a hypothesis that there is only one electron in the universe

the movie is awful, people are just idiots

@@nahuelahpa1881 no your just a sad no life who's dad left

Underrated Comment here.

None.*

It's a list of 22, actually.

Replying to myself before someone says YOU DIDN'T GET THE JOKE YOU DUMBASDDSSSASSSS I'm just being a smart ass, shut up.

Richard Stierwalt you didn’t get the joke smartass

I'm deceased

It should’ve been the ok hand sign because it symbolizes how Thanos metaphorically says “gottem” to the universe after killing half of it

Lmao imagine thor throwing the storm breaker and thanos just casually dabs and erases everyone

He should have done sign language for "I'm a big poo poo boy" because I don't like him and it symbolises that he's a big poo poo boy.

It should've been the stereotipical italian hand, because Thanos kind of resembles a mafia boss. It could've also been the horned hand used by metal fans, because the gauntlet is made of metal.

Not only that, but he could have done it too, they just came to a compromise and then we get widows origin

Because you know HE CHANGED HIS LIFE AFTER meeting BW

Hell he's introduced to the series by as a guy who is seconds away from killing a complete stranger just for trespassing.

@@thomasmuandersontheneousul4184 And you know what else changed his life? His family being dusted along with billions if innocent people

@@StardustCorvid Well that scene itself is literally an impossible scene as Thanos dusted people IN THE AFTERNOON and yet it is morning where Barton is - so it literally not believable what is happening. If you do a piece of fiction it has to be somewhat credible what happened with Barton and his family is not

Does this mean Thanos might have been feeling some sort of way?

@@diegodankquixote-wry3242 thanos was feeling some sort of way

That’s like saying Johnny Blaze’s Ghost Rider shouldn’t kill because he’s an angel. It doesn’t make sense. And Zarathos is a spirit of vengeance, and he has no problem killing humans who he deems guilty.

Hey which kinda takes away the half point they got for the Thor arc

"You should have gone for the head" - Thanos himself

Spider-Man should eat people alive because he’s a spider.

I'm a 14 year old and I can confirm the level of brain cells used in the screen rant review were more like that of a toddler's

Now stop insulting 14 year olds

@@deepaparakkal4241 14 year olds are nerds.

@@the_egg_, I don’t see that as a bad thing

You do realize you've summed up EFAP -which Jay appears on as a guest quite a lot lolol

I mean you're not wrong

@@Adam_S51 actually he is he forgot civil war which he was in and lost

@@newtsalamander8759 He was on the Captain America team, who were indeed the winners

@@baronrob20 my definition of a winner isn't being forced to live in hiding or go on home arrest for five years. They may have won the battle but lost in the long run

@@newtsalamander8759 He took one for the team, allowing Steve and Bucky to escape and uncover the truth. Then he gets to spend time with his family.

@CJED It's like 10 minute videos. The longer the website, the more ads they can place on it before the user thinks they are spamming the ads, only that on KZfaq it is way easier to see when ads get spammed.

@@nahuelahpa1881 oh wow, someone likes what I don't like, how smart and mighty I am

Nahuel Ahpa can u stop spamming in everyones replies youre so fucking pathetic

Nahuel Ahpa Can please go away?

Why did you insert yourself into this?

Making fun of ScreenRant is tight.

The only good thing about screen rant

@@joshhunter6928 The only reason I'm subscribed

You need to get all the way off my back about the rest of screenrant.

Whoops

Not just A spaceship, THE spaceship She takes out Thanos's flag ship

I love it because the script makes it a point of presenting the ship as a major and tangible problem. It solves a lot for Thanso when he's being overtaken. Crazy..ml.

Yeah she doesn't get much screen time cause they're focusing more on the characters that are having their finale, and she'll have more showings later on. But in the time she did have, they sold her as powerful and significant in universe.

I believe that his wife would pick the couch, since she seems to be home far more often

@@extralongbaguette8880 interesting theory. However, it then begs the question why did the wife choose the couch? MCU theory Hawkeye has a super power and it's giving his wife colorblindness (or bad taste)

Release the black-couch-cut!

I theorize it was a gift from a mate who didn't need it anymore, and Hawkeye never got around to replacing it.

I agree that he'd have a black couch, but not for that reason.

Yeah i wish he brought that up

Yup

@@lucyditee He does he says it in Japanese to the Yakuza boss the exact conversation goes. Yakuza boss: Why are you doing this? We never did anything to you! Hawkeye(Ronin) You survived, half the planet didn't. They got Thanos, you get me.

@@AustinPrice184 It was subtitled I assume right?

@@Maltesfilm yes it would be a lot to ask of fans to understand Japanese to understand a key scene

It's not even a new time travel concept. DBZ has the same kind of rules for time travel. Sure it's less common but ffs they explicitly say "it's not back to the future style time travel!"

@@lProN00bl but in db super they kinda spit on that in the ep that they kill the present villain and in the future that said villain said that survived because he is using an tima magical ring, not because the past don't affect the future

@@italucenaz not really, time ring only for time travel only. it not protect him from getting killed in past. beerus said that after kill current zamasu. same thing happy with trunk arc. what ever happen to cell or android still don't change future trunk timeline

Exactly. In Marvel, comics time traveling always made new universes, Along with the fact every decision a person makes creates a new universe.

@Frank Wells I know you're being sarcastic to make a point, but I want to point out that I genuinely dislike Last Jedi. Not because it tried new things, but because it just... doesn't... work for me. It just doesn't work when I stop and think about it. I could give you a list of every single reason, but it would take more time to read them than it would take for you to watch Exci's current video on Screen Rant's idiocy. It's... it's a long list.

Yeah, imagine not going back and doing the things you’ve always wanted to do after finally finding an opportunity to do so

Except that is exactly what happened. She came in at the last minute and saved everyone.

@@PaulSmith-nb6md Saved everyone? She was outsmarted by Thanos and got beaten. Almost everyone never completely won against Thanos in a 1v1 fight, they only allowed Thanos to be distracted for a short while

@@PaulSmith-nb6md that's not true, she was only able to distract him for a while

@@shianeruu4359 yup

@@taekookie1976 So we are gonna pretend she didnt one shot his dreadnought? We are gonna pretend like she didnt beat on him with s gauntlet on? Ok then.lmao

Screenrant acting like high up Yakuza members is just everyday Chicago street crime

I remember a time when fan theories were restricted to online forums and people geeking out in private... Now it is a top story on Yahoo news.

RJD1116 Like “Young Avengers” How is not confirming your fanfic the #1 issue of a movie?

Reminds me of people with TLJ and TROS.

Oh gee you mean like fucking Star Wars fans

“They didn’t use my KZfaq film theory video to write episode 8! This movie sucks!...all I asked for was for them to remake episode 4, they did that..and I’m still mad! Fuck you disney you ruined Star Wars..yay they are bringing back George Lucas finally we can fix this..just ignore all those videos I made about how George Lucas ruined the prequels

Why did you give me a spoiler to Teenage Mutant Shrek Ogre: Endgame

It was so sad when Aquaman Drowned…

@@itsalily_lei_lei exactly, just like when thor died to electrocution...

@@yousufrazwan9583 No, that was _Thor: Ragnorok._

@@yousufrazwan9583 or when Natasha was bitten by a Black Widow spider and freakin died

Cody Cole that would have actually been amazing

But then it wouldn’t have made sense that he was there in the first avenger

How would he be in space in with the watchers then

If some of the films’ writing had been changed and some of the cameos, that would be great.

There is a theory that he turned into Mr. Rogers, and it does add up until you get to Mr. Rogers' day of death

MrAndyhamms isnt’ that just a throwback quote to captain america 1?

@@singleplayer9773 why can't it be both?

@@singleplayer9773 The throwback quote was Steve saying "Don't do anything stupid till I get back" which Bucky replied "How can I? You're taking all the stupid with you" in the first Captain America their roles are reversed, that call back was essentially the two characters closure.

I understood that reference from pitch meeting

Also their “don’t do anything stupid/you’re taking all the stupid” is what they said when Bucky went off to war, they both they that it was very likely they would never see each other again, but like if Steve chose to stay in the past and there was a chance he’d die before he came back to the present

Yes. Humour is a cooping mechanism. I think it was just as much needed for the characters around Thor as it was for Thor. Its implied by their reactions to his weight gain that none of them had seen him in a ling time. They assumed he was running his village as a leader. I think they felt guilty for not being there and made jokes to lighten the mode.

@@TheKat12364 “Humour is a cooping mechanism.” Yes, I too tell jokes to chickens to get then into their coop. JOKE!

Yes, laughter is a coping mechanism, but the problem with Thor in particular is that most films in general depict men going through depressive states as jokes and easy to laugh at humor. That's why everybody is so mad about how it was portrayed. A lot of the time women get the emotional moments that make the audiences understand their pain while, in Thor's case, it was used as a punchline in multiple instances.

@@TheKat12364 yeah i used to kinda scrunch me nose at that as well, until i re-evaluate what i thought i knew about how people cope and how others around them react to their coping mechanism. i don't remember every character's reaction to thor sinking that low, but i remember rocket's, and thor's own reaction, and his mum. looking back, watching thor was painful in sympathetic way; i get what they were going for now. and if there's some audience that then treat him as laughing stock, too bad but that checks out-people _do_ in fact laugh at others, anw. it's more of a testament of those particular audience than the movie maker, imo.

His depression wasn't played for laughs, the jokes in the movie were played for laughs. Fat jokes are still considered the only 'safe' jokes to make, but even that is starting to change. WE aren't depressed, so those jokes were made for US to laugh at HIS pain. Thats why people object. Thats because its a movie, not real life. For 'real' then pretty much all bets are off in how people react to half the world disappearing, and Thor, well, the guy has seen his planet destroyed and people devastated. For 'humour' they should have focused on the rock thing and bug. That wasnt' bad with the video games, but could have been better. Hell, some young asgaardians being shown and wishing for the days of Loki in charge would have been truthfully funny. Hell, if Odin could have stayed alive another half year they could have had some real help. But somebody's mother dies in a movie and making jokes about their appearance isn't playing for laughs, its just cruel. Of course sometimes people are cruel, but movies have their own rules to play by.

They have probably seen that one "Fathers Day" episode where Rose touches baby Rose and suddenly paradox eating reapers appear. I see that episode metioned so often in discussions about Doctor who, especially when two doctors meet. I can totally see screenrant do an article about what doesnt make sense in Doctor who, and half of the entries being "Why didn´t the paradox reapers appear when..." Warning, rant mode has activated. They then question why there are no reapers when two Doctors touch each other. Then they cite the grandfather paradox for the original appearance of the reapers. Rose stops her father from being killed, which stops her from going to the day of his death, etc. What they fail to see is that the way worse paradox is that she saves her father after she just saw him die alone in front of her FUCKING TWO MINUTES AGO! Rose intruded on her own timeline of two minutes ago. Her later touching baby rose is a very tiny paradox that only strengthens the reapers enough that they can make it into the church they were hiding in. We have seen that it is possible to change the past of someone. At the end of the episode, Roses memories literally change (which would mean she wouldnt have a reason to go back and be at her fathers side while he died alone), and in a christmas special, the eleventh Doctor literally invades someones past to change their memories and make them a better person. He even brings a child version of them to meet their current self. No reapers, no time complications, nothing. The guy eleven is trying to change is like 90, so the universe has plenty of time to sort itself out between young adult guy and grumpy old guy. The same happens with rose. Between baby rose and her mother witnessing the event, and adult rose, the universe only has to change a few tiny bits. Her father has to die again, which is easy, as he is a squishy human, and roses mother has to tell child rose a slightly different story about her fathers death. The big paradox for the episode was the two different versions of the same event happening simultaneously only two minutes apart on their personal timelines. During his Timelord Victorious episode, Ten changes an important event, a fix point in human history, and it changes his memories of what he read on Timelord Wikipedia about the event. Him specifically knowing what will happen is why he couldnt interfere without breaking the rules. In the "Fathers Day" episode, they not only remember the alternate event, it was still in their short term memory. This is a disruption of their personal timelines first and foremost, with the "dont touch baby rose"-bit just as little extra, but many people still cant stop thinking you cant touch your previous selves. And Screenrant are just the kind of stupid people who might think that way.

@@Magimasterkarp The more realistic answer is probably that they wrote an episode early on that would be pretty limiting for episode ideas in the future so they just kinda forgot about it.

Damn straight that's y i watch the bi3dman debunk their vids

Endgame has too many flaws you don't even need to nitpick

Yeah they conveniently make their videos filled with useless sins to extend the time of the video to beyond 10 mins haha

@@Spartan11117777 you aren't supposed to take any of their videos seriously. They even made a video sining themselves

Kimberley Browne It’s alright, I stopped watching their vids a few years ago.

Should’ve T-posed to assert his dominance.

he should have fortnite danced

DerpiFoxGaming which one?

@@uncomfortablyclose8481 Don't play Fortnite, but probably the floss dance, if that's in there.

Ohno

Yep, and I actually tend to get any at people propagating that stupid "depression is always sad" myth. Its not. Many people with depression use humour to cope. And many of those also like to make people happy and laugh because they know how it is to bee so deeply depressed.

Thor definitely had the best character in those movies, he couldn't but help to. Letting himself go is one thing but the fat jokes at his expense is what seemed in bad taste. Using humour is one thing, insulting people is another. If I knew somebody who had depression, I would certainly accept whatever they were doing to cope (within reason). However, I wouldn't be making jokes about them.

@@mikearchibald744 not everyone would though. The film shows (very clearly, I thought) that the other characters were uncomfortable with how thor was acting, and didn't know how to treat him. Most of the quips at his expense were followed by a long silence, and were delivered with muted emotion, not the jovial attitude with which they normally quip, with the exception of thor himself, who is sayingbthat jovial attitude to fit in better with the team dynamic of the past.

@@matthewparker9276 I think thats WHY people make jokes at peoples expense-they are uncomfortable around them. Thats likely also why they may say racist and inappropriate things. I can't say more because I really don't remember the movie very well and didn't like it enough to watch it any more. I think it was the raccoon that they got to do most of the joking, making one character 'the inappropriate one' is a time worn tactic in films.

@@theexchipmunk the problem is the writers/directors intended for it to come off as sad and tragic. You weren't supposed to be laughing, but at the same time they made jokes at his expense. When he started crying in front of the Avengers, they just kind of put him off to the side.

IG and EG come from the same script you idiot they cut into two films for money they are not "two" films to begin you f'nin moron

It okay, they still got an F-- on the exam.

Hes just being safe if Steve doesn't come back

He clearly knew he was going to stay in the past.

Orange Ink no

@@samjackson9560 explain

I think he knew that Steve wasn't coming back. But you could be right.

Captain shinshon Stark did u not watch the movie?

Not location, time period.

campbell burgess Not where, but when Yeah, I know, I know, I’m gonna slit my throat for that

It's sad how they don't pay attention to crucial details in the movie that are not hidden in any way. Now, I wonder, could they have used the stones from the past to bring back the stones of the present? Not that it really matters anymore but just a thought

I Just realise sth, couldnt the avengers just went to the garden before thanos destroy the stone?

Yeah I mean like in the movie its not THEY refer to OTHER works of fiction either ... nope no reference to Back to the Future nope lmao

@@thomasmuandersontheneousul4184 what the can you edit that comment I think I had a stroke

Darius Spearman yeah why didn’t he Wait

Plus, in Infinity War, Thanos was so confident he was going to win, he shed his armor as soon as he got the Space Gem. It's like he believed that having just 2/6 of the Infinity Gems meant that he was essentially invincible. Besides, what difference does it make if Nebula knows where he's going to retire after his victory? Until he destroys the Gauntlet, he'd be too powerful to stop anyway.

Mega Man X Powered Up Because with only two stones he was already the most powerful being in the universe they literally say that in IW

AdamVlogs 55555 wow do you know Superman?

Not true, not true, Ryan George is a treasure. Besides that, yeah it sucks.

I was really hoping to see a reply from Superman.

AdamVlogs 55555 is confirmed to appear in the next Superman movie because he knows what kryptonite is.

Spelling must be yours

Why did galactus target earth?

@@dhararry7929 well think about it like this. Galactus is this all powerful being who had been able to consume every planet he’s come across with few exceptions. However, earth has been such a massive thorn in his side that he has been consistently warded off by earth’s superheroes. To the point where an earthling was able to make him his own herald. Him targeting earth was done because earth hurt his pride. In other words, just apply what captain marvel said in avengers endgame: “not every planet has what earth has”

@@limeylime8027 well, what if he doesn't exist in the mcu?

"no" -me

@@JayExci well okay then

@@JayExci let me get off of that thing

@@JayExci Although i understand the problem with thor and hulk's arc, i hope marvel continues it. And to screencu*t, hulk is still out there. They are gonna continue his arc. Even thor's. Thor is with asgardians of the galaxy and has two movies coming out. They are handling the arc consistently enough as the characters are still there. But you can't disagree with me that marvel did something that game of thrones could not: give satisfying arcs to characters. Game of thrones kinda forgot, more like we had amnesia and never knew what happened.

“Okay, let me get off that thing!” 😁

Also, since they want to talk about symbolism, he had the power to literally wipe out half the universe with just a snap of his fingers, which he did. I feel like he even said something about that in a previous movie, but that could be a false memory

But to be fair on Question 2 they do have something called the Mind Stone on them

@@securitysnail5996 you would think that would give them knowledge, but no. All the mind stone is give you control of and the ability to read anyone/everyone's mind. There actually isn't an infinity stone that automatically grants knowledge. The closest is the time stone, which grants you immortality and the ability to control time

Then Screenrant is just dumb (but we already knew that)

@@securitysnail5996 true dat

I mean, up until that point in the MCU, only Asgardians, Kree, Skrulls, and Thanos' forces had been to Earth. Asgardians had forged friendly relations with Earth and were effectively homeless. The Kree backed down since the 90s and they never had much interest in Earth anyway (unless we count AoS and even then its a fringe group of Kree). Skrulls came to Earth following Carol and they have since formed a friendly relationship with both her and Nick Fury. Thanos had already done the deed, and the only reason he went after Earth was because it had Infinity Stones. The only outside threats left come from the mystical side, so we only have to assume that Wong and co. held down the Sanctums in the absence of a Sorcerer Supreme.

Half of the population of the universe being gone is actually a reason for Galactus *not* to attack them. He waits for the worlds to have lots of population because he feasts of life energy. There's even a theory online that Thanos did all this to save everyone from Galactus.

Also if any other groups or beings were going to cause trouble during the aftermath of Thanos, you would think they would avoid the planet that came closer to stopping him than anyone else (even defeated his first invasion in Avengers 1), and then tracked Thanos down and killed him.

The only counter to this I can think of is Dormammu, and I don't think he could have been dusted as he exists in another dimension. Without the Sorcerer Supreme guarding an earth with half the population, Dormammu should have easily taken over.

@@excelsiorcameo5295 But Doctor Strange showed that Dormammu by itself hasn't much interest for invading earth, it only was "activated" by Kaecilius and his guys.

is that suppose to be a jab at screen rant or endgame because I can't tell, of if your saying endgame is good or bad.

@@ordeaux26 I think he's just saying endgame has flaws, but it is nowhere near as bad as the article.

Exren and that’s saying something

That's someone who barely read a wiki. They clearly establish the rules and the exceptions. And most of the time, The Doctor is the exception to every time travel rule.

I mean that's kinda true in dr who too

day of the FUCKING DOCTOR SCREEN RANT!

@@conradlorgar5508 no it isnt

@@firebirdlego855 remember when Amy and old Amy tried to both get in the tardis and thats would screw up reality or how two Rose's (baby and adult) touched and it broke reality even further It's kinda one rule for time lords and another for none time beings

you people are just bonkers stupid

How did you not make a "Fappening" joke?

Efappening

what a beautiful duwang

@@jedolson8667 today looks like a picnic

They skimmed through the Wikipedia article while on a coffee break

They watched those “Endgame spoilers without context” videos

Steve Jobs described it to them, my dad told me.

The person who wrote the article probably based it on the endgame movie pitch video.

How did he get back to his own reality? He was always Peggy's husband and he was Sharon Carter's uncle by the logic of the film, and we aren't shown anything to contradict that. Which means I absolutely hate that particular plot point. I'm fairly sure they didn't consider the implications when they chose to write it that way.

Right like if he didn’t care at all why would he call her his daughter, he’d have just called her a lackey or minion

Thanos deserves Fictional Single Father of The Year Award

@@thatoneguy7024 And, when he promises Dr Strange that he will spare Tony from the Snap, he implies he has some control over who gets dusted. Maybe he spared Nebula on purpose, or at least because he knew Gamora cared about her? Still not sure it excuses the 20 years of constant physical and emotional abuse which gives her permanent excruciating pain though...

Alice Anderson , it’s better than killing them over billions of years like Ego

@@thatoneguy7024 True 🤷‍♀️

The Blip*

@@robbiejelsomeno5679 T'was a joke, my friend.

@@PlotlinePlus oh my

@@PlotlinePlus oh my

@@robbiejelsomeno5679 is that one of the names?

😂😂😂

RoyalFlashCraft I don’t think they were right about that, but their own logic contradicted their nitpick

Where did they say that? I believe you, but I can't remember it

Beastinvader at the beginning of the point

@@mujiescomedy279 Yea, its the classic ScreenRant "random assumption to strengthen a poor argument" trick.

BURN IT WITH FIRE

He got contacts during the blip. They’re his blip contacts.

WHAT HERESY IS THIS BROTHER?

They look wrong.

I think its the ear to eye ratio

Yeah, i feel bad for thor. Lost everyone, failed to save the universe from thanos, he really faced so much that his present condition was imminent.

Let's also not forget SR mentioned it themselves that Thanos had planned to snap for years. And even then, Thanos already knew that in that future, he DID snap and kill half of all life. That's why he went to the future. To stop the Avengers from undoing what he did. So he knows he snapped already, he had planned to snap all along, and HE DID SNAP IN FRONT OF TONY. Screen Rant, ladies and gentlemen.

You know for just a random KZfaqr you are actually smarter then a very popular KZfaq channel with millions of likes (sorry if I botched those numbers of likes) So, good job!😁(Wait🤔that means ah forget it.)

n8opot8oW Also his whole plan where he declared that he would kill 100% of people instead of 50%

PSWii60 yeah when I watched the movie the second time I realised he definitely knew as well

When cap was old he said he put the stones back then decided to stay "well after I put the stones back I decided to get some of that life tony was telling me to get"

Which makes sense. Bucky is the only other character taken out of time for 70 years. He knew what he would do if he was given an opportunity to get a redo for that time, and assumed Cap would do the same thing.

Bucky also said "I'm going to miss you" before Cap left. You don't say that to someone who you know is going to come back in five seconds anyway.

Maybe, but strange told them its one and the other ones as alternative plans And theres a scene strange told it in infinity war

Maybe Strange saying there were 14,000,605 futures but they only win one is because the chances of the rat releasing Ant-Man from the Quantum Realm was 1 in 14,000,605.

@@jackal_9791 I think it was where thor kills thanos in infinity war

i have a theory about this. in doctor strange, the ancient one says that when she looks into her future with the time stone, she can never see past her own death. we can assume that these same rules apply to strange. so when strange uses the time stone to see into the future to figure out if they beat thanos, he wouldn't be able to definitively answer whether or not a scenario in which he dies would result in victory. meaning there could be 14 million other scenarios in which strange dies in the final battle or survives the snap and dies in some other way, but they still defeat thanos. another theory i have is that what strange was actually referring to when he said there was just 1 is tony's sacrifice. in every scenario in which they win, tony snaps. this is supported by him saying "if i tell you what's going to happen, it won't happen" which is a somewhat niche line often used in stories with time travel or psychics/premonitions that is to foreshadow that character's death. i think tony was smart enough to infer what that line meant, which is why he knows exactly what he needs to do when strange signals him with a single finger up.

@@endless_del that actually makes a lot of sense

facs

RoyalFlashCraft that’s a really good point

That's the explanation on top of my head too

Exactly

I think what they were trying to say is: Why didn‘t the gauntlet, that is made out of Iron Man tech, turn into a ball so that Thanos can‘t put it on?

@@phunder3027 he could rip the reality stone out and made it into one. Probably was one of the 14 million possibilities

Y E E T

This bitch overpopulated... *_Y E E T_*

No he planned it

Bucky seemed to know something was going to happen. maybe not exactly what it was but he told steve “...you’re taking all the stupid with you” which i know was a reference to the first avenger but it also implies he knew cap was going to do something.

Also that would just give his friends a chance to talk him out of it or go instead of him

Old Cap explicitly says to Falcon " *After* I put the stones back, I thought maybe I'd try that life Tony was always urging me to get."

Wait a second wouldn't him staying in the past make a new timeline. If he is in a new timeline how did he show up old at the end

It’s on the tip of my tongue but what’s that a reference to? Skyrim?

@AnonymousTheorist 666 it’s just a meme with a farmer from a documentary.

@@rhemophi but it also a skyrim meme

@@AtomicOwl not really

Honest pay for honest work

So they don't even understand how time travel works in Docter Who.

I’m guessing Bucky either expected him to come back in the same spot old or not at all

Xcalibur Untold Cap taking advice from someone he (usually) likes and respects? PLOT HOLE.

Didn't Nat say that?

@@Cnut_the_grape Nat said something similar to that when she was eating a peanutbutter sandwich with Cap, Cap made a callback to that scene at the end of the movie.

That was after he already left and aged. That's not the point being made.

Isn't there an entire thing based around all of the doctors doing calculations to save their home planets or something(Not really a DW watcher so I don't know the most about the show but i know some basics)

I mean there are multiple specials where different Doctors team up

Dr Who is internally inconsistent. In a throw away line in Time Crash meant to be humorous he states that the paradox could rip the entire universe apart.

Characters also meet their past selves in Star Trek. Old Spock meets with young Spock in the Trek reboot. The series finale of Voyager is about old Janeway going back in time to change the past so Voyager gets home early.

The Second and Third Doctor shook hands near the end of "The Five Doctors" and Young Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart touched Older Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart in "Maudryn Undead" and caused "The Blinovitch Effect" and prevented The Fifth Doctor from giving up his "remaining selves." Screen Rant SHOULD do their homework before they criticize a film OR use a TV series about time travel as evidence of "sloppy writing."

Actually no, they could have failed during time travelling, in the final battle etc. So its probably not just 1 out of 14.000.605 chance.

@@litten4112 I think he's saying because everything worked out the way it did made this the 1 out of the 14m that they actually won.

@@SC51793 thank you!!.. Jeezus

@@litten4112 well, yeah.. They did fail... 14,000,604 times 😒

So that would mean that he got stuck in all 14.000.605 possibilities but maybe thanos snapped a little sooner or a little later so he wouldent be So its a probability inside a probability Probableception

Right. Because Clint's wife sat back and let him handle all the interior design.

Josh Kaid I was gonna comment that, I saw his point as a challenge and was gonna do it but I’m happy to see I don’t even need to cause other intellectuals exist

Because he wears all black, he can't be a loving family man. Good father's wear colours.

But he has a teenage daughter, so it will be black with hot pink edging.

@@Pajali [cinemasins voicee] Stereotyping *ding *

It should be noted for clarity that “a lot of people” = about half the russian mob. It’s a relevant detail.

​@@lukelandis3090 It's not like he wasn't a murderer before. He was an a military agent for S.H.I.E.L.D. I don't see why it's so weird that he goes on to do what he always did, just under his own jurisdiction.

Maria ER the difference is that when he worked for shield he did what he did under orders to help as many people as possible. In endgame he’s really just killing because his family died. Sure he’s killing “bad” people, but murdering 100 mafia members is still murder.

@@Aplesedjr Well, I have a huge bias against any military organisations so I don't look any more kindly on murdering under order than murdering for vigilantism.

Maria ER you don’t have to, but knowing that when he was simply killing just to kill people was very different from when he was being occasionally being ordered to kill in order to actively help people is important.

He belongs in the future. That's the entire point of him. If he was always mean to go the past why introduce Sharon?

exactly

@@rachelmoses3059 belonging to be in the future and being fated to be in the future is different

@@horseoperamarker How so? Do you know anything about the character of Steve Rogers? He was written to be ahead of his time and not wanting to be in the Jim crow era. I don't care about any ship. Steve Rogers belongs in the future and not in a time where he can't eat at the same diner as Sam ( his friend). He sure as hell doesn't belong in the past where Peggy Carter as Director of Shield hires Armin Zola. That's canon. And if ? Steve is man out of his his time what does that say about *Bucky* who is also a man out of time. Why can't he also go back? Maybe pick up a comic book before talking about shit about Marvel's most political character. Oh and the "man out of time" thing? It's supposed to mirror Jack Kirby's (the creator of Steve Rogers look it up) experiences *after* he came home from fighting in WWII. Jack Kirby couldn't get a time machine to go back before before he went to war. Why does Steve?

@@rachelmoses3059 you realize that this Steve Rogers is different from the comics right?

A little late but, the marketing implied that she would be like the last hope but she wasn't, it's okay to not have her be a main part of the plot since she is so op, but the reason the movie gave is pretty bad, saying that the same things are happening on other planets, like, if she goes with them those things stop, it would take less work, my problem with her is that she kinda just appeared out of nowhere at the end, not only would there be no way for her to know what was happening, but even if she knew it's kinda annoying that she just went there at the end and acted so cocky while just doing two things in the whole movie

@@ilvanasgobero8096 Captain Marvel went becos she can and has the power and speed to go to planets which are in need.... Avengers had to save earth and help the people... They can't just go to other planets to help and leave earth in need. Captain Marvel went to planets which were in need so when earth needed help she came to earth again and destroyed the ship and all. If the role was more than that it would have just been bad for the film and character itself as it would be a lot more annoying and people wouldn't like it. Yes she was hyped for endgame but captain Marvel in the end did make a lot of difference... If she wasn't there in the end... Thanos would have snapped but she stopped it, she destroyed the ship which was raining blasts so I don't think she was useless and hype wasn't worth it

@@omkar2894 i know that, my point is that they hyped her up too much, for a character that barely appeared in the film, the thing about the other planets is that it's the same thing that's happening on earth, if she went back in time they would've brought back everyone, they should've had her appear more in the movie, it's like she stole a kill in a game at the end, she stole the show at the climax of the movie when all the characters had already given their best, it's kinda annoying, just imagine, you travel through time to get the stones, almost die, and in the end people thank the person who just appeared in the end to destroy the villain's ship

@@omkar2894 my point about the hype is that she was hyped to be a character that would've been present throught the entire movie helping the heroes, but no, just a few minutes at the start and at the end, they should have given a better reason for her to not go back too, they weren't going to just save the people on earth they would help the rest of the universe too

@@ilvanasgobero8096 but she didn't save completely.... Tony Stark did... That's why people liked it.... It wasn't some random girl who came out of no where and saved the galaxy.... It was Tony Stark and his sacrifice. Captain Marvel just helped just like every other side hero. By hyping her up maybe it was disappointing but it's better to have a little than to have someone absolutely wreck things up and win everything by herself. Plus it's Avengers endgame and it was there last Avengers movie so main characters had to get more focus

Two timelines I’d like to see are the Thanos-lite timeline where he disappeared in 2014. And the Cap returns timeline where he exposed Hydra in SHIELD as he helps Peggy Carter assemble it. I’m also hoping they explain the glaring inconsistency between the TV and movies after Infinity War. I’ll have to rewatch the end of last season but the big bad was preparing to fight Thanos and I think the New York battle was mentioned. Perhaps the New York thing could be retconned as the Defenders blowing up a skyscraper. I don’t know. If so, then this season would make sense in that context. The alternative would be that this season of SHIELD takes place in the Thanos-lite timeline. That way the New York attack never happened and the show can follow it’s own course. Runaways and Cloak & Dagger could go that way too. I hope not but given that both shows are about teens, having half the teenage cast age 5 years would probably be troublesome for the shows and people have enough difficulty handling all six original Avengers surviving the snap. I haven’t seen Far From Home yet so I’ll be interested in how they handled it there. Much of Peter’s close cohort seems to have been spared according to the trailers.

Yea. Watching a movie where first Cap goes and deliver the stones back then return to Peggy to live out their lives with Shield. Like co running a Hydra less Shield could be cool. Or how Endgame basically saves 2 universes by having Thanos die in our universe.

@@zemoxian Why would Agents of SHIELD need to be in a new timeline based on the events of season 5? It ends before the snap even happens. Season 6 I could see an argument for but season 5 is fine.

Yeah, I took the "I'll miss you" and such as confirmation that Bucky knew. He's Cap's oldest friend, Steve probably told him or he figured it out.

I assumed Bucky said "I'll miss you" because he didn't know how long it would take. Falcon even asked how long it would be for them. So the "I miss you" was targeted for Cap since for Cap it could've been 70 years for all Bucky would know before Cap sees him again. That or Bucky knows Cap well enough to know that Cap would decide to stay behind in the past at the last minute.

I mean that’s the only real explanation because redheads don’t have souls.

Ysgramornorris Wow. This is an amazing comment. I personally don’t think this is the case, but your analysis is excellent.

Doesn't seem to be the case, but a nice thought.

Thor is traumatised for a different reason ;)

William Tenney what the f is the wanker sign?!

Coil your hands and shake em horizontally

Racingcar 3 who’s gonna be the one to tell him?

@@laurenceraran4027 I didn't know what it was but now I do 😫

I read this in your voice lol

They did not

Weekend Warrior oh hey man what you doing here

Heeyyy meng

@@turtleanton6539 what about the several plot holes? I disliked this film, out of the 22 MCU films, theres only 4 I dislike . So biasness isnt some reason to dislike endgame when I wanted it to be better than the dark knight