Subscribe and Like the video :) You should watch me live on Twitch: / rarran ▶Discord: / discord ▶Twitter: / rarranhs ▶TikTok: / ytnarrar Edited By: / avedaveed #Hearthstone #Rarran #hs
Пікірлер: 774
@Rarran6 ай бұрын
For the record, this video isnt trying to make fun of people at all. It is interesting going back and seeing what people thought of cards that ended up being good or bad. I am not saying anything negative towards the person reviewing. I, for one, can think of multiple times where I have be wrong about a card. The ogs of this channel will remember the warlock weapon from stormwind that got nerfed twice, and I said it was garbage. I hope you enjoy the video.
@xnick_uy6 ай бұрын
This was a fun video. By the way, how about you giving a go to the Cursed Blade, in post-Badlands Hearthstone? I think the weapon was underappreciated, and with the available tools after numerous expansions I think it can prove to be at least fun to try (e.g. warrior can pack some discard-weapon and destroy-weapon effects nowadays) -- and there could even be some benefit out of taking more damage (Molten Giant??).
@david-fl9cy6 ай бұрын
dont worry people if this series goes on for long enough Rarran will not escape his fate of being in one of them (or a couple of them)
@Zortakable6 ай бұрын
Now we need your editor to put together a video of your card predictions, so you can react to yourself
@estesh80496 ай бұрын
Can be both
@noobking266 ай бұрын
In defense of Troggzor when it did come out there were two things in hearthstone during this time players hated that Troggzor was theoretically supposed to counter. The first was first was frost mage, that deck was the most powerful and hated at the time because it could just ignore the board and kill you pretty quickly for the time. The second was big game hunter which at the time killed anything with 7 or more attack for THREE mana and had a four-two body to boot which Troggzor being six attack could avoid while being a serious threat. the six-six body ended up not being a big enough threat for really anything at the time and it took too long against mage who could just let frost block pop to live then kill you anyway.
@karavandriver72946 ай бұрын
I love that Kripp was so excited for hungry dragon and most of his memes at the time were his hungry dragon summoning a poisonous minion and just wasting his turn.
@ChickpeaMilkshake6 ай бұрын
The volume editing on this video was HORRIBLE. I have to keep raising and lowering the volume depending on which video clip you play... 🤦♂
@jimshotfirst48876 ай бұрын
@@ChickpeaMilkshakewho are you talking to?
@King_Konglish6 ай бұрын
@@jimshotfirst4887they prob meant to comment on the video instead of reply
@jimshotfirst48876 ай бұрын
@@King_Konglish I am fully aware of that. It will not stop me from making fun of them.
@Mazortan6 ай бұрын
There were no 1-mana poisonous, you're smoking
@43bg16 ай бұрын
Excavated Evil is in the “played because Reno existed and you needed 29 different cards” category
@32Singder6 ай бұрын
also there was a really good but not very popular attrition deck called elise priest which ran basically every single removal and aoe, and it ran two excavated evils
@signofastorm6 ай бұрын
Spot on. The highlander concept saved HS, because it would significantly increase the number of cards going into decks, thus making the game more fun.
@shaedeymamlas54966 ай бұрын
There was also a surprisingly high amount of stuff it tended to hit at the time/where the amount of damage was just good enough for a boardclear
@lukelorianTRON6 ай бұрын
While true, I think the thing that made excavated evil good was actually that the 3 health breakpoint was VERY relevant at the time. Holy nova just couldn't handle that throughput, and priest just couldn't handle 2/3s from your opponent well. Obviously lightbomb was better for full clears but excavated just had its place.
@Icetea-20006 ай бұрын
@@signofastormsmart observation
@S1L3NTDr460n6 ай бұрын
31:57 If you look closely, you can actually see Reynad the Prophet looking into the future and seeing all 200 games where this thing RNG snipes his X/1 minion and he just loses the game on the spot...decides he just doesn't want to talk about it and just moves on to the next card~
@thisnamethingisstupid5 ай бұрын
In the series Rarran does with him using old expansions and stuff he lost 2 juggles with that card and had a salty rant about it 🤣
@KhristianBolano4 ай бұрын
reynad = eren
@JoshSweetvale3 ай бұрын
Reynad is known for having spectacularly bad luck.
@maxwang9566 ай бұрын
flamewaker didn't just "fit into" tempo mage, it basically was the whole deck.
@galax123706 ай бұрын
was tempo mage good tho instantly when it was released? because I dont think so
@penguinmaster166 ай бұрын
@@galax12370it wasn't the best deck at the time but it was definitely good. It's the deck I got legend with for the first time
@jeremykline66876 ай бұрын
@@galax12370 Penguin isn't wrong, tempo mage was at an amazing spot for the meta (it also was my first legend deck), but Flamewaker was a huge reason. I mean it was really the perfect card. You have to remember, you were playing a ton of zoo (so this card was ELITE), and then you were playing like warrior and priest control, and this card helped both matchups be favorable. It's cards like this, along with old mana wyrm, that made unstable portable so unbelievably viable in tempo mage to take on both zoo and control, along with fire balls to the face. It wasn't just the cheap spells that helped flamewaker either. It was always relevant because the 2 damage per spell was very necessary when you had to win fast vs control.
@galax123706 ай бұрын
@@jeremykline6687 see thats the thing I think unstable was only played in mech mage and tempo was a "meme" deck tier 3-4. but I gotta admit compared to grim and combo druid I guess it wasnt really even grounds.
@43bg16 ай бұрын
@@galax12370 Tempo mage wasn't at its best until after the warsong commander nerf because it was pretty bad against patron warrior.
@azentra75606 ай бұрын
If I remember correctly, Kripp was a big arena player, maybe this is why he had a completely different mindset/view from Trump, who played more constructed?
@25thSkye6 ай бұрын
In the early days Kripp played lots of constructed as well. His opinions were valid too.
@Corrupted6 ай бұрын
He reviewed for both modes in this
@Dragonpuncher1236 ай бұрын
Trump actually started out as the biggest arena streamer in HS and Kripp was playing standard.
@Sinzari3 күн бұрын
Trump was an equally big arena player. Both mostly played arena.
@maho91396 ай бұрын
Its so weird seeing these card reviews today, it felt like it wasnt even that long ago but it has been like 6+ years since then. I felt like this was the peak of hearthstone in terms of content and balance
@CountFab6 ай бұрын
There are many things that modern Hearthstone still gets wrong, but balance is so much better with the frequent patches, ain't no way we would be waiting for an Undertaker nerf for more than two weeks nowadays.
@B4ckst4b3r6 ай бұрын
Man I just picked hearthstone back up and the last time I played I was playing jade shammy, pirate rogue and warrior and murlock pally. Evolve shammy. Some of the fun I've had. Looking at top decks atm everything just seems like X class Reno....
@Samuel-wl4fw6 ай бұрын
It was aggro hunter only meta...
@CJWproductions6 ай бұрын
There's so much time covered in this video, what are you referring to
@jessehendriks28776 ай бұрын
To be fair. Trump was absolutely right with loatheb. Hearthstone at that time was plagued by aggro decks, and a 5 mana 5/5 really wasn't cutting it if the enemy had 7 minions who were ready to delete you from Hearthstone on turn 4.
@TJPesce4206 ай бұрын
Yeah, but those aggro decks played loatheb on release. Being able to delay brawl/firestrike/freeze mage combo was nuts.
@AndreySolovyev4206 ай бұрын
@@TJPesce420 got to comments to write this. loatheb protecting your board for 1 turn effectively resulted in 10-15 face damage from minions which would otherwise be dead to board clear. this is wild to me that trump clearly recognizing what is meta decks didn't realise that loatheb would benefit them and not playing against them
@FireSignd6 ай бұрын
Every deck played Loatheb post Naxx release.
@Y0G0FU6 ай бұрын
many aggro decks used spells to push for lethal or remove Boardclear like a Doomsayer. Trump was kinda right depending on the Aggro deck you faced at the time. But he failed to realize how utterly disgusting Loatheb would become when these Aggro decks drop him at turn 5 or 6 :P
@skuamato78866 ай бұрын
I think what Trump (and apparently some commenters here) missed is that you always have to evaluate the ceiling and the floor for a card. In the case of loatheb, the floor was a good statline in an unoccupied spot. It could kill almost all 4 drops in the game and survive so even in the worst case scenario you could just curve it out and not feel bad about it. In any other case, it ranged between really good and straightup gamewinning. And that imo was why loatheb was played so much: Because there was literally not a single scenario in which loatheb was "bad". Kinda like Dr. Boom.
@neros_soren6 ай бұрын
About Excavated Evil: Because I exclusively played Control decks until I dropped the game, I can speak from experience. It was a staple in Control Priest, because, sure we had better board wipes, but we played Reno decks. And even in that deck, sometimes even as a two-of. Because the meta was slower, you were able to get away with a duplicate card, if you played it as a two-of AND you were able to ruin an opponents Reno by shuffling both into their deck. But even aside from that, it was the 3rd board wipe Priest needed at the time.
@dstreetz916 ай бұрын
People were pitting it against lightbomb, the issue with that is an aggro swarm could easily kill you before lightbomb was castable. With excavate you could brick their draw and 3 damage to all would usually clear at that time against an aggro deck. While it wasn't super exciting as a card it was still good enough compared to holy nova being 2 damage AoE that could miss some threats easily if you didn't have a bloodmage thalnos out though basically everyone would kill a thalnos on the board.
@Someguyy8673 ай бұрын
I remember it being not good but not bad. It was alright and against agro it felt great, but other than that it felt alright most the time. It was a much needed card for priest at the time though.
@jacobnorris82562 ай бұрын
Light bomb also just wasn't reliable enough against aggro decks. Sure, it's a fantastic AOE card that's potentially just a twisting nether for 2 mana cheaper, but it also doesn't kill anything with more health than attack. So in some situations the card just wouldn't work, and your AOE not working properly against aggro is a death sentence. 3 damage AOE however basically always gets rid of every cheap aggro card. It also helps that having 2 different AOE cards has always been the way to go for control decks, and holy nova just wasn't a very good control card.
@joegaster346 ай бұрын
Keep in mind, at the time Grim Patron came out, Warsong Commander was bugged. 3 attack minions would only have charge if you played them. But once Grim Patron came out they fixed the bug. I think everyone knew about the Warsong Commander bug, so they probably didn't have that combo in mind when they were reviewing the card.
@williamw85906 ай бұрын
Although to be fair even after they changed warsong scommander to remove the combo, Grim patron proved to be insane
@andy02q6 ай бұрын
@@williamw8590Ostkaka won the world championship with Grim Patron Warrior after the nerf when most had abandoned that deck.
@KarazolaX6 ай бұрын
Bro I swear I saw that card on preview and immediately knew it was gonna break the game before it came out
@Sinzari3 күн бұрын
@@williamw8590 It wasn't insane, it was just a solid playable deck at that point. It was VERY matchup dependent.
@williamw85903 күн бұрын
@@Sinzari it was the best deck in the format hahaha
@dibreman61846 ай бұрын
Man Kripp was so much happier in the start of Hearthstone I wish I watched him at the time
@tomekk.18896 ай бұрын
Yeah it made me sad. Dude's played the same game for 10 years
@CountFab6 ай бұрын
The arena snipers got to him.
@wilsonian60826 ай бұрын
Kripp spectates was peak content, maybe you can still find it
@murphthasmurf59236 ай бұрын
These guys really just weren’t thinking about knife juggler despite it being like the best 2 drop ever even back then. Implosion? Knife juggler synergy. One eyed cheat? Dies to the juggle even in stealth. Flamewaker? Basically a knife juggler. Hungry Dragon? Free knife juggle for the opponent. Flame Juggler? You already know.
@TedTed-xh1ys6 ай бұрын
Yup. It was weird people just forgot about knife juggler, considering you got screwed by it in every game at the time.
@badwulff6 ай бұрын
It's easy to laugh at the real bad takes in hindsight, but honestly most of their reviews stay on the prudent side, or tend to be decently accurate assessments for the majority of cards - plus, it's cool of anyone to put themselves out there with the knowledge that their predictions have a chance to make them a laughingstock, so I respect them for it
@TheYoutubeUser696 ай бұрын
Absolutely. It's still hilarious
@patrickwienhoft79876 ай бұрын
Especially since many of them, mainly Kripp or Trump, didn't fear to just state their honest opinion against the majority. It's so easy to say "Yea, I underestimated Dr. Boom, but come on, everyone did" so as a public figure it can be tempting to just go with everyone so you don't embarrass yourself but these guys went for the montage clip predictions (in both the good and bad way) and I love it.
@Ellefsen976 ай бұрын
It’s very hard to know if an unreleased card is good or bad because no one knows for sure what the meta would become at expansion release. Many of the bad predictions was because the card would be bad/good in the pre-expansion meta
@kryss123456716 ай бұрын
except Amaz. IMO his opinions weren't backed up with much sound logic overall. They seemed not well thought out. Reynad and Kiblers assessments were really solid overall especially because of their advantage that have with Kibler being an ex pro magic the gathering player and Reynad also being a good magic player. I can say with confidence that playing a lot of magic especially at a high level is going to translate very well into Hearthstone especially in terms of gaining experience with evaluating cards well. Having said that, I believe Amaz played mtg at some point as well but it seems his evaluation skills were lacking at the time.
@badwulff6 ай бұрын
@@kryss12345671 In this compilation sure, but then again I haven't seen much of his full reviews - that's also another point I didn't really mention, which is that compilations like these focus (for obvious reasons) on the worst predictions, when in reality, I'd wager that their fuller set reviews almost certainly have more accurate takes on average, given the larger amount of cards (including easy-to-rate stuff like textless filler).
@mooncalf_45346 ай бұрын
Reynad's Flame Juggler analysis was probably the best analysis I've seen.
@Telhias6 ай бұрын
5:32 "4/1 survives against some guys" Kripp with the galaxy brain takes. I wonder how many of those are there among cards that can attack?
@badwulff6 ай бұрын
I think he probably intended to say "4/1 trades against most guys [at that point in the game]", but yeah that did come out weird
@cookies23z6 ай бұрын
he meant "guys" as in classes, as in not mage/rogue from back then, still not great considering other classes have... well... cards, but still.
@vaspeter26006 ай бұрын
Shieldbearer in shambles
@WinterFrostx6 ай бұрын
Probably as in, some hero powers do not just remove this for free. (Mage, Rogue kinda, Druid kinda, etc)
@Jashinthegiant6 ай бұрын
He probably meant it survives after you play it until your next turn, when you can use it. Against Priest for instance you would have had high likelyhood, especially, when it was stealthed.
@Caleb_Denin6 ай бұрын
The Kripp clip at 17:14 had me dead to rights, I've been giggling and snorting every 2 minutes because of it.
@TrimutiusToo6 ай бұрын
Naga sea witch initially made giants cost 5 but then interaction changed and suddenly she is broken in wild
@ThundaFuzz6 ай бұрын
yeah for some reason they changed the interaction years after the Sea Witch was released and then it became problematic.
@TrimutiusToo6 ай бұрын
@@ThundaFuzz they streamlined order in which interactions happen which resulted in this side effect
@NightKev6 ай бұрын
@@ThundaFuzz They wanted to increase consistency across the game, but since cards like NSW were designed before that change... well, sometimes good intentions have unforeseen consequences.
@aradan39136 ай бұрын
Loatheb was played in those aggro decks Trump feared would kill it. They were kind of right with Grim Patron because it was only played in exactly Grim Patreon Warrior; unlike Dr.7, implosion... But they didnt see comming how insane it was with exactly warsong commander and a discounted hand with Thaurissan. Turns out warrior was good enough to play until that wincondition was met. Brann saw 0 play during League of Explorers, it went up in the later expansions. 45:11 Tunel Trogg Shaman aggro deck was S tier during League of Explorers. It dominated the last month of the expansion, pushing into the next expansion, because it dumpstered on the midrange decks and secret paladin.
@jacobnorris82562 ай бұрын
Yeah the evaluations of grim patron were actually really damn good. They were basically all like "it doesn't look good but it kinda looks like you can do some crazy combo with it" - which yeah, that's what happened. Grim Patron was literally only played in 1 single deck (I think there was like 1 other semi-popular off-meta deck at some point, but that was it), and that's entirely because you could do some crazy combos with it. Grim Patron was such a super specific deck, and you can't possibly expect people to guess that he'd be good because of that. Everyone was also completely right about Brann because yeah, he really wasn't meta at the time. He needed more battlecry units being printed to become good.
@Graplevader6 ай бұрын
31:57 this isn't Reynad saying flame juggler is bad, this is him future thinking about EXACTLY how much misery he's going to feel seeing this card every SINGLE time it's played until he gives up hearthstone.
@DuckMastah076 ай бұрын
Wow that was a trip down memory lane... Haven't even touched HS for years and this came up as recommended.
@43bg16 ай бұрын
Reviewers often have a hard time seeing complicated combos in advance-that’s why they all missed Anyfin and grim patron.
@dominequemccool23596 ай бұрын
Man I didn't realize this was almost an hour, felt like 20 minutes. Absolutely loved this video. Loved the mix of correct and incorrect reviews
@RaxoFilms6 ай бұрын
you arent fooling me with the mysterious challenger thumbnail
@MrPersona946 ай бұрын
Expect the thumbnail was true, people thought challenger was bad. It was the bane of my existence tho.
@RaxoFilms6 ай бұрын
@@MrPersona94 sad moments
@JoshSweetvale3 ай бұрын
A 6 mana 10 mana card.
@maciekpiotrowski31786 ай бұрын
17:22 That "Someone cooked here" made my day. 😂
@caryjeffery86806 ай бұрын
Honorable mention to Lifecoach quitting the game after seeing the Un'goro hunter quest because it would dominate every game, only for the card to be absolutely terrible. I think he just wanted to quit.
@amethonys27986 ай бұрын
I think the thing people didn't get with Mysterious Challenger is it also just thinned your deck by 4-5 cards. This is a world where "premium" card draw was like Azure Drake drawing 1 card for 5 mana and we have a 6 mana card drawing (and playing) 5 cards. Sure, they aren't "good" cards, but removing 5 stinker cards from your deck means you are more likely to draw your Tirions or whatever after you play Challenger.
@kibabeatssasuke6 ай бұрын
i think the broken part of of mysterious challenger is redemption, noble sac, and avenge. if you played it on a board with one small enemy minion your opponent would try to kill using a spell, procing redemption, then attack a minion in to finish it of, procing noble sac into into avenge, leaving you with a 9/3 ready to attack into the next turn
@joshs71606 ай бұрын
That's not quite accurate. While the Pally secrets were mostly underwhelming in standard play, getting 10 mana worth of secrets in a single turn, was actually pretty fucking great.
@joshs71606 ай бұрын
@@kibabeatssasuke The broken part was that it cheated out 10 mana worth of secrets, those secrets weren't that great for 2 mana a piece, but it turns out getting 5 of them in play for free was pretty damn good.
@mubarakraza96666 ай бұрын
Um am I crazy, paladin secrets used to cost 1 mana?
@joshs71606 ай бұрын
@@mubarakraza9666 That's right, probably why they were a bit of a waste in terms of using a card slot, but challenger changed all of that, cheating 5 mana was still very solid.
@yolenain6 ай бұрын
Actually Naga Giants existed in wild only because it was buffed when they changed the interraction. Before the giants kept being 5 mana with Naga on the board, after the change the discount was after the effect of Naga and ppl played giants for free. And i really liked this video, it was fun.
@zakatara6 ай бұрын
Yep, in Standard Naga was trash.
@NrgSpoon6 ай бұрын
That 5 card murloc combo makes 22 damage on its own, two Grimscale Oracles would give the extra +8 charge damage for the full 30. I remember it being an interesting deck to think about counterplay when you consider things like the mirror match, or how transform effects can mess it up so sometimes you'd need to have ways to kill your own minions the turn you first play them.
@AmandaBCFR6 ай бұрын
There's something fascinating about The Mistcaller. In the sense that ever since we have seen so many variations of the same effect. And in hindsight it's so interesting to see how that kind of effect is only ever good within a certain mana range. Cards like Snapdragon and Azsharan Gardens are good because if you hit them early you get to extract a lot or value from the stats, usually in decks with a strong early to mid game. While cards like Lor'themar Theron are good to decks that want a strong late game. But that 1-3 and 7 mana thresholds feel meaningful, both because it gives you and edge early on or because it makes your late game hard to compete with. While that nebulous 4-6 mana range is usually really awkards for cards like these. Either because the game ends before this of because this is the phase of the game where balancing board presence/control is important. Nevermind that this is the range where a lot of strong effects compete with each other. Making things like Blackrock n' Roll feel awkard or clunky, this card in particular I feel is rather curious because it exists squarely in the middle of the previous examples. The effect is more significant than a 1+ 1+ but not as strong as a double the stats. Class considerations are always a thing but it's so curious to see how they've played around with the effect.
@MYPEEF6 ай бұрын
Felt really nostalgic to see some of these reviews again, would love to see more!
@lukethebaron54086 ай бұрын
"Do you think they got into a discord call" is so funny to me because when naxrammas was announced discord didn't even exist, it didn't come out until may of 2015
@MrParadux6 ай бұрын
When Thaurissan was released, he was the only mana-cheat card around apart from Innervate.
@lynneecho45986 ай бұрын
there was also preparation which was in every single rogue deck until it was removed
@AshfcknKetchum6 ай бұрын
*The Coin has entered the chat*
@dstreetz916 ай бұрын
@@lynneecho4598Yeah the card that they purposefully hamstrung development of rogue spells for years and years. It was so damn annoying because every single rogue spell they had to go "is this too good with prep?" If yes, nerf it until it wasn't too good. I'm amazed the spell lasted as long as it did with the 3 mana reduction cause it broke rogue.
@MrParadux6 ай бұрын
@@lynneecho4598 You are right. How could i forget about Preparation?
@Zakading6 ай бұрын
Thanks you, David, for bringing us this much great content and letting Rarran show it to us!
@greg0rmendel6 ай бұрын
i loved that video! i love your explanations of how strong the cards turned out to be etc. definitely want to see another one :)
@willvale86256 ай бұрын
Phenomenal video, love to see it. Thoroughly enjoy seeing all these blasts from the past
@KariThomasMiller6 ай бұрын
Loved this video! Not just for the old cards, but the OG streamers and such. I don't follow Hearthstone nearly as much these days, but during this era, I watched basically all these reveiews. Also a great reminder that hindsight is always 20/20.
@gankplang6 ай бұрын
Cursed Blade actually saw play in Wild Pirate Warrior for quite some time as a 1 of, turns out 6 damage for 1 mana was pretty good!
@TedTed-xh1ys6 ай бұрын
It saw play in standard, too.
@knownas20176 ай бұрын
Unless your opponent plays it, too. Turns out 1 mana for 12 damage is pretty good.
@jacobnorris82562 ай бұрын
@@TedTed-xh1ys It was TRIED in standard i'm pretty sure it didn't remain in any list for an extended period of time. It was extremely shit in Aggro mirrors. ESPECIALLY against other pirate warrior decks, so ironically the card was at its best when pirate warrior was bad.
@pikipxx6 ай бұрын
Please do another one of those! I had so much fun laughing and watching this, also nostalgia hit hard haha
@joshg21886 ай бұрын
Amazing video, thanks for putting in all the effort to do this! Can’t wait for the sequel so we can see Defile, One Star.
@stephenshein46006 ай бұрын
Great format, would love to see more of this. A lot of fun
@Lord_Hammer6 ай бұрын
I would really love another video like that, looking at the next expansions! I really love the concept, really cool video man
@MM36Productions6 ай бұрын
This is an incredible concept rarran. Please continue it! Great job editor too :D
@voltrex126 ай бұрын
Dude Anyfin Can Happen was my most favorite card ever. Thanks to it i got my first time ever Legend with OTK murloc Palading it was so fun to play and calculate the dmg. Loved it so much
@DarkDeadish6 ай бұрын
Thx David, looked for old card review montages and never found them except single clips so realy thank you david (and rarran i guess)
@kundrad83986 ай бұрын
27:36 - after returning to hearthstone and playing arena, that change took me by surprise, when on turn 6 I played an 8/8 giant (8 mana, forging reduces the cost by 2) and it got deleted by this worm + 1/1 locust, summoned from a 1/3 weapon in a previous turn. That lost me the entire tempo and I lost the game, because I had no way of killing it because of that combo. 😂
@thisissostupidqsdfva6 ай бұрын
Nice video Rarran! Nice to see you producing hilarious stuff (as usual)
@skuamato78866 ай бұрын
This brought up some Nostalgia goddamn. Back then I didn't watch that many reviews but I did play a crapton of HS. So I still have PTSD from some of the cards like the tunnel trogg, flame juggler or Undertaker. You were right on the money at 32:20 that reynad hated this card with a passion because it could randomly win or loose you the game on Turn 2 kinda like Knife Juggler, except it was literally a coin toss (e.g. hitting the shield from shielded Minibot or going face). Knife Juggler at least had to be played in conjunction with other cards and could shoot multiple times, averaging out the luck. Btw, @ 52:20 the reason Highlander Decks were called Reno decks is because Reno back then was the only card that had the "highlander clause" so it was obvious that "Reno Deck" and "Highlander Deck" were synonymous. The "highlander" Archetype only started to get called that when they released other highlander cards and reno was no longer auto include in highlander (looking at you, razakus priest). Btw, playing against reno was so frustrating back then because a) you never knew which random one ofs your opponent played and b) the game (against aggro) literally always came down to them having the reno on turn 6. Which was super annoying.
@jakubpuawski38755 ай бұрын
man, I haven't played hearthstone in like 7 years and now this vid randomly popped up on my feed, definitely felt like a trip down a memory lane
@MrManultra2 ай бұрын
This was a blast from the past. I remember standing at the Busstop at university, waiting for my ride home, watching Reynoodle reviewing cards on my phone... Best days.
@Alkalote6 ай бұрын
It's always fun looking back on how people misjudged a lot of cards that either looked good and ended up being absolute trash , look at some say cards would be really bad and these same cards ended up being crazy good (A certain 1/5 evil boi and his lackeys for example). Or there is alwasy the middleboard whith cards that were just fine. It's fun looking back on how much powercreep changed the cards and how costs are still the most important things in a card utility (If not Yogg or Shudderwock or any crazy op effect ofc)
@mokiiiiiiii6 ай бұрын
With all the hype around Troggzor back then, imagine building a Troggzor deck and getting clapped playing ranked every time and not understanding why you don't have 90% winrate against the bozos who don't run Troggzor 😂
@Cuestrupaster6 ай бұрын
It was pretty much like that because people usually didn't understood why a card was good or bad... most recently the only card that achieved this was Renathal, although it was a good card, but not nearly half of the decks that ran it got better winrates because of it...
@Y0G0FU6 ай бұрын
Troggzors biggest issue was that in every Situation it was a good 7 drop.. Dr. Boom was just infinitely better. And then Dr. Boom had so many more uses on top of that haha
@adalwolf83286 ай бұрын
@@Y0G0FUHard disagree, the problem with Troggzor was that Troggzor sucked. 7 mana 6/6 was absolute unplayable trash, ability didn’t matter at all since your opponent would either trade into it for good value or just kill you.
@plaguin90096 ай бұрын
I loved watching this vid and I would love to see more content re-reviewing all the old set reveals
@neilu71326 ай бұрын
great content, hilarious to go back in time to these old reviews when the game was super different :D
@cmadden926 ай бұрын
I watched all of these back in the day.. this was a great recap video :)
@KhristianBolano6 ай бұрын
I had so much viewing the reviews of Dr. Boom and Troggzor back to back. Really brings me back to those times LMAO
@cookies23z6 ай бұрын
lol the amaz quickshot on the side "thanks satan" haha
@GTORITO166 ай бұрын
Just got back into hearthstone and I’ve been binging your vids. Your collab with hearthstone pros is what hooked me, but you are the reason I stayed. Great vids Rarran!
@Freesliterature6 ай бұрын
“Someone cooked here” im dead dude
@planetarybreathing10906 ай бұрын
One of the most fun videos. Gj, waiting for the part 2.
@Taziod6 ай бұрын
Really liked this video. As an old hearthstone player I literally watched all these reviews, so I recall what I thought as well. Seeing the perspective from someone who's continued playing is amazing.
@juricapozder22064 ай бұрын
man i love this old videos its keeps me getting back to good old days when hs was fun, keep up raran with this concent, we love it
@leeresglas51156 ай бұрын
Holy shit as someone that played from Naxxramas onwards through many formats I just got MAJOR nostalgia. That was so funny seeing the reactions
@KarazolaX6 ай бұрын
I really like how Trump tried to mince his words about Dr. Boom, like he was trying to leave himself room to be correct with that unspecific "There will be better 7 mana legendaries" And it just ended up making him as WRONG as he could possibly have been
@JoshSweetvale3 ай бұрын
It was the greatest standalone card ever printed.
@Flamewolf146 ай бұрын
This was a sick video!!!! Love seeing history of ganes and the community thoughts around it especially because i really want to make a digital ccg. Also super love the hearthstone expansion series same vibe big fan!
@oskartholen70816 ай бұрын
Ah nostalgia Rarran my favorite! Its hilarious to see these with the hindsight! 😂
@adamb60356 ай бұрын
I mean everyone thought Troggzor would be insane 😅
@bimbendorf51666 ай бұрын
Kripp was cooking so hard in some of these, omg
@turntsnaco8246 ай бұрын
Your editor is freaking goated....this is the best video idea I've seen in a while. I would love to see more reactions to older Hearthstone content.
@JacobWrestledGod6 ай бұрын
What a trip down memory lane. I even remember hearing these reviews years ago
@hipunpun6 ай бұрын
Hilarious, loved this. Please make more!
@Kellentm6 ай бұрын
What's actually crazy with Kripp talking about Anyfin at the end, he basically comes to the conclusion that in his mind the card is so terrible there is no way it could have been made, so he must be missing something and its "probably pretty good somehow". The most woke non-woke someone has ever been.
@ShadowRaZeV16 ай бұрын
DO MORE PLEASE! I WANT TO SEE ALL OF THE VIDEOS UP UNTIL MODERN TIMES. I LAUGHED MY ASS OFF THE WHOLE TIME XD
@BoopaKing6 ай бұрын
One of the few things I remember about Hearthstone from back when around the time I quit playing is that Anyfin can Happen was _the_ "I win" card once you played it since bluegill+bluegill+murkeye+warleader+warleader+grimscale+grimscale was exactly 30 damage. It was a genuine Exodia in most cases And those Dr. 7 takes were pretty funny in hindsight.
@pif76356 ай бұрын
Amazing video, I’d love to see more card reviews!
@Ceractucus6 ай бұрын
Rarran the original Anyfin deck had 2 bluegills, 2 warleader, 2 of the 1 cost 1/1 that gives all Murloc +1 power and old murk-eye. This was exact lethal. Later they added the stealth Murloc that summoned 2.Murloc from deck whenever it killed something. The alpha strike was reduced to 27 damage, but you had all Murloc played and dead much faster.
@Tralldan6 ай бұрын
I'd really love to see more of this. I can't remember what people said about corridor creeper back in the day but i just KNOW it's gonna be hilarious
@darkjackl9996 ай бұрын
7 mana 5/5? Garbage ;)
@gettingbeat6 ай бұрын
24:20 maybe my favorite power creep is how nowdays you can pay 1 more mana to double the stats of your minions in your deck
@snakeking50095 ай бұрын
To properly explain how bad mistcaller was they later gave the same ability to a 2 cost 2/2 where the only negative was having to have no duplicates instead of dropping a ridiculous 6 mana 4/4 destroying your tempo and not even affecting the cards you draw till very late.
@TheHandsomestMale6 ай бұрын
God this was a blast from the past. The Walter White meme at 53:16 summarised perfectly how I felt when I saw Kripp lmao. "Hank! You just play 5! HANK!!!" A lot of these takes I remember being super popular at the time amongst my friends too, we were all so naive sometimes! Hindsight is most definitely 20/20 so I'd say most of the time these guys were on the money, but man what a fun watch. Sent this to my friend because last night we were talking about Hearthstone on the way to the club. She's more of a modern player and I only really played these older sets, so I reckon she'll be banging her head at some of these hahaha
@Bumbillion6 ай бұрын
Crazy going back looking at this stuff. i definitely watched all of these card reviews at time of release. I put down the game in like KotFT/UnGoro, but I still have good memories of those early days.
@matt-xe5km6 ай бұрын
troggzor was actually really really good in ramp druid for a while because you needed multiple large cards to win, most decks in that meta couldnt afford to have multiple 7 drops etc, but ramp druid did, back then you could ramp on 2 with wild growth coin nourish on 3 and then turn 4 be on 7 mana so you had to have multiple very strong 7 drops and troggzor fit perfectly, obviously you would drop boom instead if you had it but troggzor was very good for that deck.
@samc50196 ай бұрын
People have this idea these days that Troggzor was this unplayably awful total pack filler garbage that despite the hype turned out to actually be one of the worst cards ever made. In reality it was never a particularly good card but it also wasn't anywhere near that bad. It was a niche card that showed up in a couple of decks.
@yriiiiiii6 ай бұрын
@@samc5019yeah it was never bad, but most decks would only have space for one 7-drop, and that spot got taken by dr boom
@BoopaKing6 ай бұрын
@@yriiiiiii So rather than dying to its own viability, it was killed by dr boom
@kayfimt77696 ай бұрын
You could do a whole video like this on The Marsh Queen which virtually every streamer thought was a five star, meta-warping card. Turned out to be very bad and really illustrated how wrong the community can be.
@jji74476 ай бұрын
Didn't Lifecoach quit over that card?
@kayfimt77696 ай бұрын
@@jji7447 Kind of. He said that Blizzard printing such an OP “I win” card made him lose faith in its design team and want to play other games.
@KoeiNL6 ай бұрын
I can still hear "Who am I? None of your business." even all those years later.
@JoshSweetvale3 ай бұрын
"My JAWS that BIIITE, my CLAAAWS that CATCH!!!"
@thewerdna6 ай бұрын
If I recall, Excavated Evil saw more play after Lightbomb rotated, as Control Priest then needed more board clear
@PEPE-_12_-6 ай бұрын
That was hillarius part 2 pliss 😂
@JustinSeizure6 ай бұрын
I actually remember watching many of these videoes. I got a flashback of Kripp saying webspinner is a piece of trash xD Thanks for the nostalgia bombs!
@henry99946 ай бұрын
Bro This Kripp moment is the best at 17:17. Had me gasping for air
@helloimtom1006 ай бұрын
I quit HS years ago but this video was such nostalgia. impolstion with knife, Grim Patrron, Dr boom. I still remember Dr Boom was my 1st crafted leggo.
@Undeadnightmar36 ай бұрын
I have played a lot of Paladin decks. Secret Paladin, Pure Paladin, Divine Shield Paladin, Aggro Paladin. Anyfin Paladin OTK was the most fun I have ever had with Paladin. I miss it so much.
@Herio76 ай бұрын
5:32 to this day I haven't found guys against which 4/1 would survive
@kayetan24876 ай бұрын
40:17 "Twitch chat finally gets its own Hearthstone card." Bahahaharr
@langa777776 ай бұрын
Kripp reviewed cards through the lense of their viability in arena like 90% of the time though. Every time he gets excited about a generic stat monster that’s why. And they were good in arena.
@JoshSweetvale3 ай бұрын
7:45 That concept, of 'win-more cards bad' is the difference between newbies and the beginning of wisdom.
@thesuperthingymabob82096 ай бұрын
Worth noting on naga sea witch btw that it was only played in wild bc the mana cost interaction only worked bc of a gamewide change later down the line
@wagwanbossy6 ай бұрын
Haven't played hearthstone in years but this was a cool look back at those days 👍
@BlueShellshock6 ай бұрын
Aaah, I remember the Grim Patron era. One of my favorite decks to play, had so many unexpected ways to play the combo early or late, safe or greedy. I don't think anyone saw this card coming.
@9BitGames6 ай бұрын
You never cease to impress me with your content
@Teapose6 ай бұрын
Master Jouster definitely saw tons of play in lower echelon. I can still vividly remember the coin flip animations from this card, and I don't remember much about HS because I play it like four times a year.
@MrDevilRays6 ай бұрын
Great content and I would love to see more of this
@andresalvarez28096 ай бұрын
I'm not an active HS player but was REALLY into it until like 2019. I love these videos as they make me so nostalgic. Tranks Rarran c: