hehe balls

m22 in my walls

Damn now the Chinese have the best and worst m41

hehe penis

Heey I know why close air support keeps targeting you, you're always standing on the brightest spot and not in the shadows. Your "foreshadowing" isn't really good there.

He isn’t alone, I’ve been getting bombed once every 2 rounds, kill or not, I’m a threat the second I touch the battlefield

technically it makes some sense, tanks have lower speed on asphalt as steel on asphalt dosent provide much grip and tracks can simply start slipping. Thats why ruber inserts were created for tank tracks apart from not damaging the roads

@@keldon1137 Technically absolutely but why mud 😭

​@@keldon1137 Rubber tracks designated for soft ground either

​@@keldon1137As someone who drove a bmp it accelerates the same on asphalt as it does on grass, gravel.

@@leevin7546 it will vary from from vehicle to vehicle depending on the power plant, torque, driver but i certainly seen t80 tracks sliding with sparks and drifting on asphalt too. Concrete is actually way better for steel tracks in terms of grip for example.

Gremlin mentioned🚨🗣️🚨🗣️🚨

Would you say it's more of a gremlin, or more of a goblin? Or perhaps it is most like a rat?

FUCKING RAT,some here could know who says that a lot in his shorts about wiesel

THATS WHAT IM WALKIN AB0UT!!!

talkin not walkin ffs

It's just Gajin casually shitting on American Vehicles so that the Russian Prototypes could be superior

@MrSexican12 lmao, when ever a nerf happens to western vehicles it must be bias against them right?

@matthiuskoenig3378 Depends on the context of the nerf. Like the T25 for example. They remove the stabilizer and raise the BR of it in the same update. Meanwhile the BMP 2M gets moved up and given technology it doesn't even have IRL. The fact that almost every other update a sherman or the Jumbo is getting pushed higher and higher till they are gonna be unplayable. The nerfs they hit the Losat with. Then the most recent nerf to the F-16 while another Russian jet gets an improved engine. Now to say it may not be directly bias. Though a lot of stuff in the game they also do seems to somehow give advantages to other nations like Russia, China, and Sweden.

I'm still so salty about that

Shocked M735 hasnt been brought up yet. You know, that 105mm shell that got changed based on a report from one guy who did the math wrong (one of the moderators on the Forum straight up said the math was wrong), and despite admitting it was incorrect they still havent touched it for about 3 weeks now? I mean seriously, its really hard to think that bias doesnt exist when they nerf a NATO vehicle at the slightest inclination that it could be nerfed, and yet require pages of documents verified 3 times over to get any sort of corrections that might buff the vehicle. I dont know if its true or not but Rheinmetall straight up told them, supposedly, what the PUMAs sabot weighed and they just ignored it and used their own value. Im sure there is a possibility that Russian tech gets this treatment too but I dunno what goes on in the Russian side of the forums.

Ground RB players learning about control surface compression

Most Wheraboos are Furries or GuP Weebs.

German mains when they learn basic fucking biology:

Same with bf110

because the Desert Fox?

It's because he plays smart he gets targeted

@@Anarcho-harambeism Most CAS players look for easy to spot(fast moving or in open)/ grouped together/ the guy that killed them when picking their targets. Spook is regularly most of these.

@freddy67h I definitely try to spot groups, though if I can I try to help Friendly's, though sometimes I steal a kill on accident

I just assume any light tank sneaking around by itself is a decent player and go for them, but only if I have multiple smaller bombs. Wasting a 1000lb bomb on 1 guy is just stupid.

@gmt1 nah. 4000lbs to the forehead of a weisle

US has a lot of fighters with good bomb loads though, so they tend to make up for this AA coverage gap by having more of their own aircraft. (Makes it damn hard to claw back a win if the other team gets air superiority, of course...)

@@JosephHarner Non-argument and gaijin knob slobbing excuse. I have to dookie dent my SP to spawn a reactionary plane, and then I have to dookie dent some more to return to the ground in some death marked POS to do what others can simply select in their SPAA tree in ground battles. Every other nation uses US mainstay planes at same BR to go with their own planes. Matches are sometimes -more like usually- filled with P, F, A, or B plane numbers followed by an alien symbol or dartboard dropping the biggest possible bomb. Multiple nations also have the principle US SPAA at the same BR and or some Walmart brand version, really driving home the bias.

What US spaa would you add to fill the gap?

@@matthiuskoenig3378 Yeah that's sort of the rub. I'm sitting here going "The USA didn't really DO SPAA, so the gap might be because America just assumed air superiority. I guess you'd have to give them someone else's SPAA?"

@@RedShocktrooperRST The US didn't mass produce every bullshit it had, but it made things and it tested things. T69 (M8 Greyhound with four M2's) M2 Elco B-6 T59E1/M15 Special/M34 T10E1 T85E1 T77 T65 (single Bofors stretch Stuart) T22 (3inch autoloading gun with proximity shells) T52 T100 T56 radar Duster (should just be an M42 upgrade to make the US M42 unique and separate from the M19 and all the share Dusters) M114A2 MIM-46 Mauler T249 Sperry DIVAD XM246 M113 Liberty FAADS HMMWV Avenger HEMTT Centurion C-RAM 25mm Bushmaster Humvee (because 5.x R3 bad joke to match the rest of the future BS) ... You can see there is more if you look for it.

Gajin is obviously biased towards Russia and China

Does it get thermals

@@IlllIlIlIIlllno

@@IlllIlIlIIlllno only nvg

No just night vision no thermals.

That is how it SHOULD work. it just doesn't however.

yea that`s how it`s works

Tell that to the conqueror shooting through the tiver 2s UFP and getting no spall.

@@user-tj9vp8re4d You've clearly never played any tank with any form of solid AP. an APHE shell that doesn't detonate, creates more spall than a solid AP round.

​@@robertharris6092Which is mad because then you have the Chieftains 120mm APDS that does pretty decent dmg and one just wonders why is the other metal brick flung at the speed of sound not doing dmg?

Was thinking the same. Peak German main energy from that wannabe skinhead...

Give that gay a damn video!

@@JoseVitor-ei8vtthat typo (hopefully) is hilarious

This has one of my highest k/d's and WR's. Its definitely underrated and under-used.

"umm its not SABOT its APDS 🤓🤓🤓"

Can’t blame me, was balls deep in a 5.7 match and saw this and had to write the comment quickly

Or swap to HE for the finish.

I'm genuinely scared by that tank Encountered three times while being in my RISE P (it was a full uptier every timd),needless to say the third time i just launched my smoke grenades and retreated

No seal clubbing allowed

​@@kimjanek646yes no poor seals to be clubbed

He already did the 2S3M

yeah the american one seems so much better even in an uptier

@@aidenblanchard7157 Worst part about both of them is the fact that one gets solid shot and the other APCR. At least it's not uncapped AP I don't think

German M41 also gets HEAT-FS IIRC.

@@WastelandWanderer1216 It does, but it's about as useful as APDS, yes it does a bit more consistent damage, but its still 76mm HEAT that detonates on bushes. And I don't think it even has that good penetration at about 250 or less, meaning it's basically better to use the APDS in most scenarios, though I take 15 APDS and 15 HEAT just in case.

The US M41 is basically like the german one, except it doesn't have the HEAT-FS and smoke grenades, thus having a lower BR. I spaded it years ago and i can say that the American M41 is a menace if used good,the APDS is not very great so the APBC (which previously was the AP) is the best choice in my opinion

It’s also a different type of stabilizer before and after the no stabilizer era. Before is a 1 axis stabilizer, after is a full 2 axis stabilizer. The technology is very different

It's because Gajin couldn't be bothered to look through historical American documents to get the tanks right. When they do they get rid of the stabilizers because it would make them better than Russian tanks. Also Gajin really just hates American vehicles.

@@aiedenoldstien9751 No. Its because past m18 most of US tanks literally were not fitted with it till 1972 iteration of M60 They literally changed the doctrine and seen them not necessary so no, its not Gaijin fault.

@gronthgronth2628 So many documents talk about a good few of the tanks in the 6.7 7.0 area having stabilizers. Though Gajin will just say no. Not purely to the m60 though

@@aiedenoldstien9751 Thing is that the fact that something was tested on a machine does not mean it was ultimately fitted. M26 is an example. While it was tested in prototype the deemed it unnecessary due to the way it was supposed to engage.

For some reason, I had this moment stuck in my head for a while, and I'd been going through the whole catalog of his videos to find this one moment XD

Literal 80's and 90's vehicles barreling around the corner at you in your WW2 vehicle like... 🍖🔥🔫🚗🏳‍🌈