15 likes?😀

People don’t like Ezio in AC2? I thought his character was one of the strongest parts of the game, and he 100% does have character development. Things like his speech in sequence 13 as well as sparing Rodrigo show this. I always thought the weakest part of AC2 is the DLC sequences, they throw the pacing off

finally someone giving ac multiplayer the props it deserves

I'm extremely happy you gave AC3 the recognition it deserves

I'm super upset the Arno character wasn't extended into further games, like Ezio. Arno was supposed to be the second coming of Ezio and Ubisoft failed him miserably. But I also blame the toxic AC fan base. It's because of them we got the RPG style AC games with Ubisoft trying to satisfy an angry mob.

Am I the only person who enjoys rogue over games like black flag? I think Shay's character development was really good changing from assassin to templar. Edit: I guess it looks like I said that I dislike black flag. I like both games its just I have not finished black flag and I like on foot missions than ship missions.

I think that Arno got his redemption arc with the Dead Kings DLC, because he wasn't tied down by Elise anymore, and you see him pick himself up and move forward after grieving for her loss. Also, I was actually shocked you called AC Origins' side-quests bad. I thought they were amazing. AC Origins is the first game where I actively searched for side-quests to do. The storylines of some of them are basic, but others have very interesting narratives that either give a deeper view into Bayek as a person, and how he is, morally, but also how the world is affected by the consequences of his actions. Hell, there is literally a mission that starts with you simply being tasked to kill some seemingly mundane bandit leader, only to find out after his death he was a bloody SAGE.

I appreciate that he points out the parts of the games that he considers as good, to let the audience that he does like these games, he's just acknowledging the bad parts of them.

I will protect acr to the day I die. Perfect City Perfect gameplay Lots of tools I love the hook blade Yes the story isn't the best and all I wanted was more, more mission to use my tool.

Loved the whole video but i have to add the fact that it has been confirmed the assassin's creed mirage will return to the old combat system and the same parkour mechanics as we see in Unity. Again, loved the video and keep up the good work!

It seems like everyone is in the “I love the old ones” or “I love the new ones” camp, but I’ve liked pretty much all of them. Only exception is Valhalla, which I’ve tried 3 times but never can get into for some reason.

The combat in Ac Mirage will return to the original style of combat in early Ac games.They’ve confirmed it.

idk where i heard it from but they say that AC mirage will be a return to"roots" so maybe it wont be using RPG combat system?

The worst thing about odessey was that the game wouldn't let us play the damn game. It would just throw us into the repetitive and meaningless side quests just to get a meagre amount of xp and without xp, it gets impossible to move forward

The thing I hated the most about Rogue is that yeah you want to show us Templars are not "evil", they just make different decisions, but in this game every templar is a saint and the assassins are basically terrorists, they're nothing like every other assassin you meet in other games. Different point of view: okay Making templars peacekeepers and assassins terrorist: wtf no

I pretty much agree with everything, especially with origin being "the beginning of the end", and not just the combat, as a whole. The game and the story were great, bayek is an amazing character, and the period during which it takes place is fantastic. But once I saw the level system and the new combat, I was really disappointed. On another topic, I kind of wish they did a remake of AC1, just adding more side content. The repetitivity of the missions actually (imo) helped make the game more immersive. You were an assassin, that needed to research and kill people. It made going the extra mile to get more details about your target worth it and, once again imo, very immersive. But yeah, the game's a fucking horror to play on PS3 with constant fps drops even in the lowest resolution. Very great vid, hope you get a lot of visibility as it feels very professional.

Really? The thing I liked least about III was the hand-holding. That game was exruciating, and you had to finish everything the exact right way. Unity forces you to upgrade your gear, and stick with the gear that's upgraded. So if you save up to get something good, you have no point of buying anything else with the in-game currency. I also have not had any better experience with the parkour in that game than in most games in the franchise. Arno still stops when it seems like he should keep going, goes in the wrong direction, doesn't care about camera position too much, and sticks to things when you want him to let go of. Trying to get him to go down a simple hole is exhausting. He won't even enter windows when you press the button prompt when it's on screen!

The worst thing about Unity are that the French have English accents For Odyssey, it's that you can't use the aspis, the Spartan shield in the game set in ancient greece

For me the list goes like this: AC 1: The Repetitiveness AC 2: The Villains. They're evil just for the sake of it. AC Brotherhood: Optional Objectives AC Revelations: Den Defense Ac 3: The Pacing. You get to play with Connor 2 sequences in and another 2 until you become an assassin. Ac 4: Tailing Missions AC Rogue: Clunkiness/2 of 3 locations are fabricated AC Unity: The story AC Syndicate: The tone. Too light hearted for that setting. Everything feels so Disney compared to what actual Victorian era was. Ac Origins: Combat Ac Valhalla: Being side tracked to not becoming a Hidden One

Worst thing about AssCreed 3? The overly long introductory section before you actually reach the main gameplay loop. I think it's the longest in the entire series with only AssCreed 2 reaching similar lengths. It's what keeps me from replaying them, especially 3 since its plot twist (Haytham being a Templar) only works the first time you encounter it.

How does this have 6 views? Lowkey caught off guard your channel looks professional keep it up!

I really feel like Ubisoft could have incorporated RPG elements in a way that flowed better with the older style of combat. Instead it feels like they butchered it and we got something akin to a 2010 god of war game. Oh and the whole "Modern story line" can really just...go away for a while. We don't really need it anymore and without Desmond it feels like the devs have almost no idea what to put in for it.

The worst thing in AC II was inability to replay memories

My main problem with ACBF is that it started the whole grinding process that future AC games implemented.

I made a video on stealth in AC Odyssey. You can achieve instant kills, but you have to level and build your gear up. Just like any RPG game. A lot of grinding and a lot of work, and you can be a instakill stealth God in Odyssey. 😁

My problem with ACIII is it takes fucking FOREVER to actually be playing Connor, yk, an Assassin. It's such a drawn-out, boring origin story. Then with AC Odyssey and Valhalla, they just aren't Assassin's Creed games. Odyssey, minus DLC, has NOTHING to do with Assassin's Creed whatsoever because the Brotherhood doesn't exist. Valhalla has a cameo from Assassins, but Eivor doesn't become an Assassin. Odyssey is just a generic open-world RPG set in Greece, and Valhalla is an open world Viking game with references to the Assassin's Creed series. I just CAN'T consider it an Assassin's Creed game if you don't play as an Assassin

Odyssey is waaayy more in depth than just being a higher level than your enemy. If you wanna one hit kill enemies you have to make a build for that purpose. Like try to find and engrave gear that all adds to assassin and crit damage. so many ways to make a build in that game.

Assassins Creed 3 is the most disrespected game in the franchise by a country mile, Connor is the most misunderstood character

I'm on my first playthrough of Valhalla and my biggest complaint is that it feels like a Chore Simulator.

Decent video, respect for highlighting the multiplayer. I never liked MP games, but AC's multi draw me in like nothing else, it was so novel. I'd list my problems with each game too, since I'm a fan since 2007: AC1 - the repeptitiveness of the investigations before main missions AC2 - When the combat slows down because there's an enemy that has too much health and parries a lot. ACB - The main quest is very short ACR - the grenade crafting was promoted so much, but after all turned out to be a gimmick AC3 - starting as Haytham set the bar too high that Connor couldn't reach. Black Flag - I get it, sailing and pirating. But the land locations the cities barely had anything memorable Rogue - the map is pretty big, but barely used, I bet you only visit 1/3rd during the story Unity - Very promising in all aspect, but all turned out to be janky, yes even the parkour, don't let those cool videos fool you. And despite the interesting time period the story turned out really bland. Syndicate - I know it's historical this way, but combat having only knives, fists and the cane sword is really boring. Origins - Having to sidetrack to gather resources for gear upgrades distract a lot from the actual game (seriously, try it on NG+, so much better) Odyssey - Personally I had no problems, I caught on quick. But there should have been a clear sign or tutorial that bounty board and random npc quests are random generated, and not actual side quests. I bet the game lost a lot of people with that. Valhalla - the fact that I tried it on a free weekend, and got bored after like 3 hours. (I already had concerns when I heard the setting and time period, just didn't fit the AC feel)

The worst part about AC3 remaster for me was that it is so bright that it burned some elements of the UI into my screen. It was luckily reversible but I'm not starting the game again.

The old combat system was goated. AC RPG combat is trash and looks so unrealistic!

AC1: Repetitiveness, and kinda dated controls. AC2: No mission replay, in the game that contends for the top spot the most often largely because of the story. Not being able to load back into the final mission to fist fight the pope again is just flat out depressing. AC:Brotherhood: The game was near perfect, but the fact that defensively, the only way to dehorse an enemy was with a medium weapon sucked. The Romulus tombs were also meh. AC:Revelations: The defense minigames, especially since they were required to unlock the Sword of Altair, requiring atleast 3 full defenses. And you could accidentally lock yourself out of them by maxing out the den masters. AC3: We didn't get enough of Connor's more gentle and kind side in the main game. The homestead content proves Connor is far more than just an angry killing machine. You can even see him genuinely show happiness, and having him actively helping his community makes his dedication to his work as an Assassin much more meaningful. Coming off of an entire trilogy of the Charismatic, wise, and constantly maturing Ezio, I wholeheartedly believe there should have been atleast twice as much homestead content, and it should have been atleast partially mandatory. AC4: So many tailing missions. Just. F*cking. Why? They are the easiest Tailing missions in the series thanks to the extremely powerful Eagle Vision wall hack marking, and make up a significant portion of land missions (and technically 2 sailing missions too). The biggest challenge is not getting bored to death by them. AC: Rogue: The conflict is very forced with the Assassin's having to shut off all logical thought to push Shay in the Direction they did. The Assassin ambushes are interesting at first but quickly become predictable and tedious. Being boarded was nowhere near the threat they hyped it up to be given how rare and easy to beat such instances were. Also, not having a proper fight against Liam at the end. Seriously, the trailers hyped up Liam as being a significant part of the story, especially the one where he narrates about Shay. The confrontational voiceover we got between them in the trailers ended up just being his final words as he died. We get a mediocre chase, and either a 10 second basic fight or an attempted air assassination, both of which end in a cliff tumble being what kills him. AC: Unity: Elise, while likeable, holds Arno's development back, and I think that 2 more main sequences after she dies, with a minor re-write so the main plot continues, would have been much better. AC: Syndicate: Jacob's half of the story is the weakest part of the game besides the extremely weak combat, he doesn't really face any real development until late in the game, where it feels a bit rushed as a result. AC: Origins: My biggest gripe with Origins is that the thing they got the most right about the combat (enemies not being super tanks) is the one thing they didn't carry over to Odyssey. The game's story is at the very least, linked to the Assassins, and wraps up with the early prototype for the brotherhood as we knew it in the old games begining to form. AC:Odyssey: The vast majority of the side content feels like it's trying way too hard to be funny, and thus, lacks alot of entertainment value, most enemies take alot of damage to kill, to the point at which small groups of moderately tough enemies, or just 1 or 2 low end Mercenaries can be a tedious 10 minute slog. The map isn't fun to explore, the naval gameplay sucks, and the Story makes Syndicate look like a masterpiece by comparison. It is barely even Assassin's Creed. AC: Valhalla: I couldn't even raise my expectations enough to be disappointed. Odyssey, and especially Valhalla feel more like a completely seperate IP that was poorly merged with AC somewhere around halfway through development. Were it it's own unique thing, it'd be passable. But it's wearing the Assassin's Creed brand, and feels the least like an Assassin's Creed Game, tied with Odyssey

The worst thing about AC1 is actually how almost unplayable it is on pc. The game controls and gnaw okay was clearly made with only console in mind and as such AC1 is so much more harder to play on pc than console, especially with how painful it is changing movement speeds, and especially with the painfully slow hands held walking that you have to do to avoid detection. This isn’t an issue in future titles including AC2

I liked ezio in ac2 what i didnt like was the parkour it felt kinda weird because some times it failed

Very good narration bro, and i like your voice (gay is not ok). Keep it up you have so much potential.

The worst thing in Unity is the combat in my opinion. Killing 1 guy is easy, but if you encounted with 5 guys there are starting to use pistols which is really hard to counter it. And its deals damage as hell. Unity is a true Stealth game and thats not a problem, but if you compare the combat to other ACs its imidiantly became ....

The combat was much better in Valhalla than Odyssey imo, less spongey ennemies, weapons feel more impactful (hard to really describe, it might be the feedback or again ennemies not taking 50 hits to kill), it just feels way more visceral and less janky, not to mention you have a lot more options in the weapons you use since you can dual wield most of them However the parkour is probably the worst in the series and the stealth is still kinda janky (tho being able to actually kill people in stealth in cool even if it makes a chunk of the mess of a skill tree useless)

good video man definitely dropping a sub 👍🏼

Awesome Video, But i think Mirage is going to have a Non-rpg Fighting style because it should go back to the routes of ac1 and Codename RED should be a RPG based assassins creed and it would be the next (after mirage) tbh im not sure i hope its non-rpg fighting and i think it will be non-rpg fighting lets just hope its not rpg styled

And if you played The ACs on PS3, u know that nostalgia will be kicking in any time you boot up the game.

Arno needs that trilogy

AC:Borherhood - Boring story ... plain villian who is not deep at all... just evil brat... where the developers just decided that he will have all evil atributes and will be just plain evil... killing family of hero - check, killing his family - check, incest - check, trying to conquer the world - check, trying to kill the hero - check ... basically the most symplistic evil character... And the city? Meh... like one part was great... the other was empty as...

The worst thing about Rogue: You're a Templar. That's why I never played it. EVER.

Great video man

Worst thing about Black Flag was the tailing missions yup. The worst one was the "follow the ship" mission. god how dumb that was LOL As for Rogue? The game dried out after you finish the campaign, naval exploration and map exploration isn't fun. There's less territories to fight and conquer. Unity? Man where do u even start, coop was a let down. It threw out the decision for the player to select their hidden blade as a weapon and made it stealth only. Enemies felt so, common and frequent they got boring to fight, every enemy could combat roll perfectly and evade hits like they were masters at fencing and so on I miss AC3's level of combat. I don't want to see it in AC Red

⚠️WARNING, LONG RANT INCOMING!⚠️ AC1: I found it very boring to be honest. graphics were phenomenal for the time but the parkour was slow and clunky and the missions were repetitive. I did love the setting and Altaïr remains my favorite Assassin, despite his american accent and bland personality. AC2: AC2 improves on alot of the problems AC1 had, the parkour got much much better with quicker climbing and an interesting story for desmond, which AC1 lacked. But obviously you couldn't replay the missions and Ezio felt kind of like a Mary-Sue. Other than those two things I think it's a great game with alot of good improvements for the series on Ubisoft's end. AC Brotherhood: It'll be hard to think of something bad about Brotherhood but I'd have to say the visual bugs/issues like how Ezio's cape clips with his shoulder constantly when you're running, forcing you to just make him wear a cape that is the same as his outfit's primary color or wear a different outfit entirely. Which is where I get to the next bug.. Outfits fuck with the missions where Ezio changes outfits so during the missions where Ezio Disguises himself and also during the suit up scene near the beginning, he'll just wear whatever outfit you equipped which ruins the whole "Disguise" thing. AC Revelations: I enjoy this game the most out of the Ezio Trilogy. It is so fun and it is set in one of if not my favorite city in history, but it feels kinda barebones and the story's definitely too short, but Ezio has drip so it's alright LOL AC3: Connor was a pretty good character, I do like his personality despite the criticisms and issues people had with it. The setting's nowhere near as good as AC1, AC2, Brotherhood, or Revelations but it's solid and very enjoyable. HOWEVER Naval missions were fucking unbearable and you didn't even play as Connor for hours. AC4: I'll decide to be a basic bitch for this game because TAILING MISSIONS ARE SO INCREDIBLY IRRITATING. Don't get me wrong, i love what tailing missions in AC games do, they're sometimes very important to the plot to tell a good story and whatnot but I don't think HALF OF THE FUCKING GAME should be tailing missions. I'm not even going to get started on tailing missions in order to not draw this segment out worse than I did with Brotherhood so let me voice a couple other criticisms and move on. Outside the Animus was just Unbearable.. it was so boring and lackluster I could've sworn I fell asleep while doing those godforsaken segments. It felt like Ubisoft was denying me to get back to the part of the game where there was an actual fucking character to play as rather than a faceless silent generic ass main character. AC Unity: After playing the previous titles the parkour felt very off, despite Unity's parkour objectively being the best. The story is kind of uneventful and Arno is just a fucking simp who's only in it for some revenge story that didn't even feel satisfying when it was finished. And oh how excited I was getting my hands on the sword of eden! It'll be so fun to use the whole laser beam thing to defeat my enemies- oh what's that? THE ANCIENT FUCKING MAGICAL SWORD BROKE? NOT EVEN LIKE BROKE IN HALF, JUST AN ENTIRE FUNCTION CEASED TO EXIST. also the combat animations don't line up half the time though I could say the same for most of the Older games' Sprinting/Air Assassination animations. Rogue is an unfair game to compare to the rest since it's so short and was basically just made to compensate old gen players for not getting Unity. AC Syndicate: Jacob. AC Origins: It was the start of the RPG Games. Great story and great Setting but the combat is abysmal. I liked the addition of Romans and Bayek was a Badass but I really wish they stuck to the old combat and stealth. AC Odyssey: NO HIDDEN BLADE, NO ASSASSIN BROTHERHOOD, NO ASSASSINS CREED, IF WE'RE BEING HONEST. Alexios is boring, the setting sucks ass for parkour, and the amount of ass pulls is pathetic. Like minotaurs and cyclops and shit, what the actual hell were they thinking? You need to unlock perks for the stealth to even be good so what's even the point in the "ASSASSIN" part of the game? AC Valhalla: I liked this game as being a Viking Game, but the Assassin stuff sucked and Eivor being whatever Gender you want rather than there being different characters is just lazy and dumb as all hell. The Graphics were great, the setting was interesting though since odyssey it downgraded parkour-wise, and I might even argue the customization peaked in Valhalla. AC Mirage: I really enjoy this game so far, but Combat is shit and Parkour looks really unnatural. Ubisoft plays the combat off as intentionally difficult to encourage more stealthy gameplay but it is lowkey just dog shit.

The only problem with ac2 for me was the parkour. It was still buggy here and there. Other than that it’s a masterpiece

Man hesring about the combat system of the newer games makes me a bit worried about how much I am going to like them(I only only halfway through black flag and going tk be starting origins soon)

I think the grinding and the enormous map is probably what made me not finish Odyssey. That's not to say that it is a bad game. I do think people are a little too harsh on Odyssey, but it definitely shouldn't have been marketed as an Assassin's Creed game. It feels more like a spinoff, I think. A gigantic spinoff. Unity is still my favorite and, as much as I love the whole starcrossed lovers thing they had for Arno and Elise, it would have been nice to see more of Arno after that because he did seem to mature really quickly in Dead Kings and I'm pretty sure he goes through a lot of character development after the main game and the DLC. But that's just the thing: We never get to see it.

The worst thing about Brotherhood are the missions where you have to use the Apple.

I dont understand why people complain about the new games... you can literally win a 20v1 in the older games with just fists

I actually enjoy the combat much more in the last 3 games. The whole "block/kick, hit, kill" combat of the early games was just way too easy, limited, and underwhelming, in my opinion.

ac2's worst part is when you wanna tear your hair out cause ezio refuses to listen to your inputs

I agree the tailing missions in AC4 are a bit much but the abstergo modern stuff was way worse imo it just felt so slow

Worst thing about odyssey and valhalla is that the game doesn’t feel like an Assassins creed game.

It surprises me how many neglect Unity characters having English accent even though it's set in France.

Good video bro, keep that quality

The RPG combat is fine by me, but your point that it can take repeated headshots to drop someone is also correct. I think one of the old D&D manuals noted that you can have all the armor rating and protection, but a dagger in the eye is still a dagger in the eye. Also, Odyssey's map is overly freakin' enormous. Was trying to complete locations and just stopped due to the frustration.

Ac2's flaw is that it has objectively terrible pacing and the timeline is just really dumb

Hot take real quick,but i don't believe Unity has a very good parkour and climbing system,while it's very flexible and the animations look good on Arno,it's mostly just Arno slowly hovering in the direction you pointed to and sometimes he just creates momentum out of nowhere

AC1: Boring. AC2: Boring. AC: Brotherhood: Boring AC Revelations: Boring AC3: Ragefest Black Flag: That one mission. Rogue: Never played, so don't know. Unity: Killing the LI. Syndicate: Nothing. Origins: Not as interested. Odyssey: Too long...? I never have issues. Maybe because I played on the lowest difficulty and know how to play RPGs. You A L W A Y S overlevel. Next zone is 15? Hit 20 before you get there, or close to 20. Valhalla: Cairn stacking...only thing I hated, besides the length.

Unitys parkour is awful. People have said Arno is the most agile assassin but playing as him feels like writing with a brick. Best parkour would be a mix of AC2 and Rogue.

This is a very well made video for some with only 217 subs keep it up bro

Origins was not the first AC to introduce boring waste of time side quests. They've been there in every AC. You just didn't have to do them to progress through the story.

Legends say edward is still tailing an npc and will do until the end of the world

Brotherhood had only 2 Desmond missions, at the beginning and at the end 💀

The Valhalla playerbase cant really be compared to its predecessors as (from what i could gather) services like psplus allowed people to get it without buyin a full copy plus any form of microtransaction or dlc purchase also adds to the total funds the game made. Rainbow 6 Siege and Far Cry 5 also made them a fortune and sold even more copies with X Defiant probably bein the next product to crack the 1 billion mark. That bein said Far Cry 5 despite bein their all time best seller still changed their formula with New Dawn a trend which they would double down on in FC6 so theres hope that AC will can the crappy RPG mechanics. While i personally despise anything RPG related i can still respect that some people are fans of the Division/Dark Souls approach UBI has taken in recent years so my hopes are that they will add in options to turn these mechanics on or off similar to what they did with GR Breakpoint

If I had to choose just one worst thing about AC Brotherhood, I would probably have to make a detailed comparison of every worst thing I could find in this game, given the huge amount of them

I feel like that unity would have worked better as trilogy and that 1st game could have been story about what motivated arno to become assassins and step into hes fathers shoes

Personal problem list, just for fun: AC: yes, of course the structure of the mission, too similar, they become boring vey easily; AC2: not my favourite but surely the most equilibrate of the games; for me worst part is the general "wooden" feeling of old ac fighting and movement, but that's just a consideration in the aftmermath; AC brotherhood: same as AC2; AC revelations: too similar to the previous two, this made it look a bit boring, but it was a great game anyway; AC3: for me one of the best stories in ac history, the worst thing for me was the combat system. too simple and impossible to fail at; AC4: my favourite one, totally agree with the boringness of the follow that guy missions; AC rogue: too similar to the previous two, and also the story felt too "modified to make you sympathise with templars"; for me the Haytham arc was totally better in this topic; AC Unity: The best game about assassins for sure, but god, totally wasted setting, awful protagonist and useless story; AC Syndicate: The story simply doesn't exist, it was ridiculous; AC Origins: I think the rpg combat is the most challenging and various, but I agree with the bad leveling sysyem. AC Odyssey: Same problem of Origins but with a better world building and combat; also the story feels too childish, what a waste; AC Valhalla: The best rpg ac game, great story, great combat, best leveling system, but too big and too long.

I really miss the old combat system. Last ac game I played was unity and tried playin origins a couple days ago but the combat was a turn off

I'm pretty new to the AC fandom I played half o all the games there are and my fav were AC 3 and rouge I was pretty surprised that people didn't liked them at first

another thing I hate about ac 3 is how long it takes to actually play as connor

ACBrotherhood has a major issue with its main story, which is notably brief and primarily comprised of a massive DLC. On the other hand, ACRevelations suffers from a small and confined world map, providing limited opportunities for exploration and activities.

I find it to. Vanhalla has a slow fighting system

oh man valhalla is such a pain

Rpg combat in itself is not the problems but if it effects stealth we have a problems is red manages to keep rpg combat but brings back the old stealth we have a winner in our hands

The repetitive narrative in AC1 had a lot of sense within the context of Altaïr, and it was offset by how good the story and his character were written.

The take I love most in this video is on AC Rogue because I dont think its been talked about enough. I also agree that the game basically just flipped the narrative: Assassins are bad, Templars are good. Heck even when Shay was an Assassin, most of his comrades treated him like sh*t. And when they did become the targets, we didnt even care about them dying (except Adewale cuz of Black Flag and Freedom Cry). What the writers should have done is show the better perspective of the Templars while retaining the perspective we had with the Assassins, and let the players have a debate on the better side. IMO I think AC3 did a better job of showing the good side of the Templars. We first play as Haytham who was a likable and relatable character in the prologue but is revealed to be a Templar. When we switched to Connor, we still see the reasons why the Templars have so much conviction in their belief as we take down each one of our targets.

uhh i think ubisoft announced that AC Mirage will have a map like unity, and combat system mixed with black flag, and the Ezio games.

Also from the black flag the blowpipe should be removed!

unity's biggest problem was teh controllers. Sometimes I felt like Arno was doing what HE wanted, not what the controller told him to. The story was not very engaging either, and Arno as a character is alright, but pretty forgettable, IMO.

Ik this is more technical but the worse part of Assassin's Creed 1 is the PC Port of the game

I have to disagree with you about Brotherhood. I've never been a fan of Desmond or the modern day plot as a whole. In fact, I'd say that the modern day segments are the *WORST* thing in *EVERY* AC game. However, Brotherhood is the *ONLY* game in the entire franchise that, *in my opinion,* managed to make the modern day somewhat interesting. I don't know why. It just worked for me.

The rpg combat is so garbage. I prefer the the counter instant kill system cause I feel like an assassin is person who went through years of vigorous training and can’t be touched when it comes to fighting

i cleared origins just because wasnt so bad, but dropped odyssey not even close to reach mid game, hated the game. valhalla was good tbh, hidden blade back, hidden ones story, order of the ancients... im definely not a fan of rpg system to ASSASSINS creed, but was a enjoyable game, i would rate it highly if this wasnt suppose to be a assassins game, but stil... enjoyable.

Ac2 is far from flawless Terrible combat system,very linear missions,the codex collecting at the end,sequence 13 🤮 Nonexistent stealth mechanics

I got a new one the worst thing about Assassin's Creed one it never got a re-release

AC origins- massively overrated and anyone who claims it’s a ‘good AC’ game is blind. Go play the original games and you’ll see why the ‘AC’ has to be removed from that’s quotation. Furthermore, the awful combat system and massively oversized map marked the end of AC. Unity was the last good AC

The only thing I didn't like about AC3 is it's long ass intro. Yeah The story required that, but why I have to play hide and seek as child Connor. Like Ubisoft just could showed that whole part in a 5 minute cutscene. Same goes with teenage Connor Hunting mission, like common. And why I have to do 3 missions on a ship going from UK to America

Wait a minute.... I've played AC1 a lot and I don't remember these slides or air assassinations...

Worst part of origins is you can’t assassinate someone because of a rank

Unity was my least favorite in terms of combat. Janky and people sniping you off the screen. The combat was old and needed some changes people are spongy in odyssey but origins worked well and the combat gave you more liberty just like odyssey and Valhalla. Valhalla had it’s new features in combat with cool finishers but the stamina bar ruined it, and the enemies being quiet weak in attack speed,complexity and damage was a letdown. Fortunately zealots exists and make you enjoy the combat system fully.

I like RPG combat at times, but I miss the old AC combat system

Mirage is said to ditch the rpg elements

If feel like if you put old combat deadliness with Odyssey then you have a superstar.

The list of my fav and hated ac games Fav Meh Hated new: assassins creed odyssey old: New: assassins creed Valhalla new: assassins creed origins Assassins creed 1 old: assassins creed rouge old: assassins creed revelations Assassins creed 3 old assassins creed 2 Assassins creed 4 old assassins creed brotherhood old assassins creed syndicate Unknown/never played old: assassins creed unity heres my opinion in my fav and hated games in the series

those odyssey frame drops. Damn

Dang Am I the Only One who liked the AC 3 naval missions? ._.