I strongly feel Nilesk is MahamanaMaharshi Nilesh Oak.

You all call this Brilliant? A simple look at Mahabharata and the kingdoms it mentions would show that its a Iron Age text !

@@randomperson6141 a shining scholar like yourself need not hide behind an anonymous name surely. You're welcome to present your studies on this platform

Well said!! 👏🏽👏🏽San V

@@crypton_8l87 Did you get my previous comments ? Where I mentioned the Link for my Quora profile ? Seems the admin here is deleting my comments.

Father of modern macroeconomics , JM Keynes was wrong in many aspects of economics even though he was from London School of Economics and politics. So, getting some prize does not mean that he is always correct and his study is scientific in nature. He has got the prize just prove the story as a great epic not historical facts. Let me ask you simple Q. Who is older Rama or Buddha? Bcz, Buddha has been mentioned in Ramayana many a times as a Nastik ( athiest, who do not believe in God) by Valmiki. Even Valmiki says Rama must punish Buddhists and stop his dhamma. How come Buddha and his followers can be mentioned in the Ramayana and Rama wants to punish them? Who is first? Rama or Buddha? How come Buddha whose time was 2500 years old which is much less than IVC is being mentioned in Ramayana happened much older than even IVC?

@@sidharthvanumurthy2745 buddha is Sanskrit word brother and that was Gautam buddha

@@JaiSingh-vt7bf Buddha is not a sanskrit word. It's is Budda in Prakruti or Pali language with dhamma lipi. You have to read history with archiological evidence. A great mathematician and Historian DD. Kosambi has written in his book by reading the roc edicts of Asoka and other roc edicts found in Nepal where Buddha was born as Sukiti. Buddha name was "Sukiti" mentioned in the roc edict of Kapilavastu of Nepal. Even Gautama was a Sanskritised name given by his followers particularly by the Mahayana Buddhists. Gautama was a very much Sanskrit word. Where there was no such language scripts called Sanskrit during Buddha and Asoka time, how come such powerful and well-defined with composition of words developed? Sukiti is a very simple and natural word without any complex composition. Let me ask you one Q. Which is first , a shapest sword or an natural -raw iron? Definitely the answer is natural and Raw Iron. Only after series of processes of resizing, reframing, and repolishing the sword is made. Similarly, Sanskrit is the Sanskari ( reformed, refined, and redesigned) language of Prakruti and it's Dhamma lipi. As there was no such language called Sanskrit that time Asoka did not instruct his writers to write Buddha words and his rules of law on the rocks what today we see notonly in India but also outside of India( Pakistan, Nepal, Afghanistan, etc.). If there had been any such language called Sanskrit Asoka would have been written in it and not in Prakruti, Kharosti and translated into Greek.

@sakata gintoki such things are unwise to me to see and get answers. What's joke. One who does not know history and can not even read the rock edicts of Asoka is saying Buddha is Brahman. Really pathetic. I will suggest u to read some archeological evident history than listening to such videos. Buddha himself has said that he is neither God, nor avatar, nor messenger or prophet then how come he became avatar of Vishnu? Vishnu Purana was written in 10th century to 14th century AD much after Buddha time. If Buddha was an avatar of Vishnu then why Sankara of Kerala in 5th century AD was incting many kings to kill Budhists and desecrated all Buddha statues and usurped them and converted into gods and goddesses ? Even if u don't not believe my words then read Swami Vivekananda who has written about the cruelty of Sankara in India on Buddhists. Read" Sankara Digvivaya" , Kalhana 's Rajataragni. U will know how Buddhists were killed, beheaded, and burnt alive by the Brahmanical fanatic kings and supporters of Sankara in Kerala. Read Kerals ancient history. Now if Buddha is an avatar of Vishnu then how come in Ramayana, Valmiki writes that Buddha is a nastik and Rama must punish the followers of Buddha as thieves? Even in Vishnu Purana, Buddha was being criticized by Yamma the death God. Yamma says that the Gaya Asura ( Buddha in Gaya city) is speeding his knowledge to all people so that the people are not dying and Hence no one is neither respecting him not fear fearing. So, he prays to lord Vishnu to punish Buddha at Gaya by placing a big stone on his head and stop his education. What does it mean? So, use your brain before believing blindly and develop asking questions. Bcz of Buddha philosophy many countries are prospering ( Japan, Vietnam, Sri Lanka, China, Thailand, Bhutan, etc. ).

@Stephen Johnson kzfaq.info/get/bejne/edaHpdJhprDVdZc.html first see this.

Thank you. Please watch other videos of mine (and also by many other Dharmic researchers. Share with your family and friends.

sir I have shared your videos in every group I am in on Facebook. Your work gives Hindus legitimacy. I am a filmmaker by profession. This is my website- www.the-weddingdiaries.com . I would like to make a film on your research if you guide me. Also I am a big fan of Srijan Foundation , Indus University and Rajiv Malhotras channel. I have seen and analysed almost all the videos that these prestigious organisations have released till date. Keep on guiding us sir.

you can contact me through my website or by using my number- 9614604677 / 8777247099 sir . I really want to make a movie so that we can attract those who find seminars and speeches boring and cannot sit for more than 20 mins watching videos like this one.

Hey don't u know sayin Jai shree Ram is communal.... even Nobel Laureate is also sayin this....

@@nileshoak4749 sir how about ramsetu Bridge? Recent study say it should be 7k years old

So scholars appear childish ? Wow Explain this : INDO EUROPEAN FAMILY ; Sanskrit Greek Latin Italian. Russian Eka eîs Unus Une Odin Dvi duo duo due dva Tri Treiis Tres Tre Tres Chatur Tessares Quattro quattre chetyre Pancha Pente Quinque Cinque Pyat Shash hex Sex. Sri Shest Sapta hepta Septem Sette Sem Ashta Octo Octo Otto. Vosem Nava. Ennea. novem nove Devyat Dasha Deka Decem. Dieci desyat Vs DRAVIDIAN FAMILY Tamil Kannada Malayalam Telugu ondru ondhu onnu okati Irandu yeradu randu rendu Moondru mooru moonu moodu naalu nalku naalu nalugu aindhu aydu anchu ayidu aaru aaru aaru aaru yezu yelu yezhu yedu ettu entu ettu enimidhi onbadhu ombattu onpathu tommidhi pathu hattu pathu padi

@@randomperson6141 In time's when Hindu unity is imp People like u are busy creating divide

@@hemantsarathe8970 Where did religion come here ?

@@hemantsarathe8970 He called scholars childish, my response is pertaining to that.

@@randomperson6141 so your intellectualness what would you say about similarities in tamil and sanskrit.

🙏🙏

flyhighdp London school of economics awarded him

@ flyhighdp Do you thing Harry Potter Story is true. ?

@knowledge tv With no offense, I say this and I see we are building country with fake ideology, fake identity to give personal advantage to the fellow who have no relationship to this country. The foundation is wrong. I don’t know what Yiu mean don’t compRe HP with Mahabharata.

@knowledge tv I need some clarity to make the point straight. Be honest and polite to answer all my question ( ever if it is silly and simple), that will allow me to get the clarity I may need to appreciate your point and get back to you. > are you think that mahabharat and ramayan is myth Indeed , it is myth, it may not true for you. But the point is, it does not matter. Who cares ? Your understanding is your faith and my understanding is my faith. > and why you think that hindu ideology is fake Could you please tell me what is hindu ideology ? is there one such thing called Hindu ideology ? > I dont understand that why you have problem with hindus First, I have NO PROBLEM with Hindus like you hit me. However, I have these questions. What you mean with your statement ? What you mean by Hindu ? Who is Hindu ? Why do you thing I have problem with Hindu ? > if you are leftist then that is ok but try to learn respect other beliefs > no one know whom ideology is true or fake but we should respect other's ideologies I let your experince to stay with you, but I don't know if I am leftist. "try to learn respect other beliefs" -- Where do you think, I have not respected ? "Remember, your FAITH is faith, till it stays with in you. The moment, you make it public and impactfull to others, I think, the others have right to respond". In the name of faith, I don't think, you can do what ever you want. if you do, that has to go through the scrutiny. Hope you agree. But your point is well taken. Agree and Perfect. Expect the same.

@knowledge tv Dear Friend, > sorry for using word hindu right word will be sanatan dharma What you mean by "sanatan dharma " ? Then , why "sanatan dharma " is called Hindu ? > "then that is not toraletable because mahabharat" Hurting and wounding is not the point. Most of the time, How to express is the challenge. people do their ability with what they know, I guess. The society is still livable, because, in most cases, I don't think people want to hurt each other. > "why you people think mahabharat is Harry Potter like you say in your previous comment that" I don't know, who are all saying it. From this statement, looks like many are saying it. I guess, in both Mahabharath and Harry porrter, things described which are possible only by imagination. That could be the reason. >. [ He just give his opinion if you dont like then dont watch simple no one have right to call anyone fake how many times till anyone dont hurt anyone sentiments and dont preach any misinformation I dont think mr oak hurt anyone sentiments or preach misinformation he just give his perspective to astronomically then how can you say him fake ? Who are you to decide who is fake or who is not ? Are you supreme court judge ? ] Dear friend, When you point one finger , remember, there are three finder pointing at you. Why do you think, I should not have my opinion ? You could also do the same, ignore me, if it is not acceptable to you. Don't think, getting hurt is your birth right. > "dont like then dont watch simple no one have right" -- if you don't want opinion, Don't post in public. What is the best way to express fake. Fake has to be told as fake only, I guess. Let me know, if there are any better way to express. Again, my intention is not hurt anyone. > " I dont think mr oak hurt anyone sentiments or preach misinformation he just give his perspective to astronomically then how can you say him fake" Me too my friend, I am just giving my perspective. Don't know Why it hurts you.? If I am taking time and responding to you, it means something to me, in someway it affected me. Hope you respect that. > His work in public. You say, "You have right to criticize", that is exactly what I did. I think, your mouth is not mind. You say, "You have right to criticize", when I do, you are asking who gave you the right. I am confused. The one who gave you the right to express also gave me the right to express. Let me make it very clear. We are not going to FIGHT for anything. "Saying YES to what is not exists, Saying NO to what is exists" both are faith. Faith is Faith , till it stays with in you. When it is PUBLIC, it is not faith anymore, it has to be questioned, its purpose, its intention, etc. Question, Criticism, opinion should NOT hurt, if it does, it only means, it is cancer to this society. You can not suppress by ill-treating, by allegation, if you do, it only further validates and confirm, it is cancer to this society. "you have no right to judge any person identity" I am not judging person identity but his work, what is presented in public. "IN THE NAME OF FAITH I DON'T THINK we can do what ever you want" -- I think, it is fair statement. In my previous statement I changed "you" to "we" to give correct meaning. [ < the foundation is wrong > Again you have right to criticize anyone work but you have no right to say that whom foundation is right or wrong because because you are no one to decide that whom foundation is right or wrong please dont pass your judgement to anyone because you are not judge ] You are putting too many question. Let me try my best. My question to you is, "Are you the judge? ". No, right ? Can't you make out the difference between opinion and judgement. Why are you twisting. The point is not that. Please consider, all the thing are from me are my opinion and criticism. > mahabharat philoshipy What you mean by philosophy ? Why mahabharat philoshipy ? Could you provide some specific ? Again, don't ever characterize/build/insult my intentions as bad intention. That is not what we am doing, that is not this conversation is about. Let us not take it there. Hope you get it.

Dhanyavad.

Wonderful logical n convincing.Just a querry.It is said that Mahabharat was written by Vyas which was actually taken down by Lord Ganesh.Is Lord Ganesh is part of history or Hindu mythology ?

@@purshottamsawant7227 that is a question. Just as nilesh said we need to collect factual evidence and find the solutions. Just because we don't have evidence it's not wrong. We need to prove that it's wrong.

🙏🙏

Thank you.

Ramayana and Mahabharata aren’t entirely mythology. They might be true to some extent. But scriptures always mix fact with fiction. For example: Mahabharata claims a Pandya king named Malayadwaja took part in Mahabharata war. But the problem is : there is no pandiya king by that name ( mostly early pandyas had only Tamil names ) Even if we assume author used a different name, Pandiyas are Iron Age kingdoms (600 BC to 300 AD ) And Tamil texts of this time don’t mention Any pandya taking part in the war. Even if you go dig the whole Tamil history , The farthest we go is till 1800 BC ( adichanallur excavations ) If you go Further back of 1800 BC - archeologists believe that Dravidians inhabited Indus Valley.

I couldn't agree more

Thank you. Just a minor nitpick, I know you meant 'Patanjali' when you wrote 'Panini'. :) Thank you for your kind words. Please watch 30+ of my other youtube videos on related subjects.

Yes its correct Patanjali. I have watched your same talk from SI 1 and 2. Dhanyavad.Very best wishes.

@@rakeshbhandari8111 even if u do spelling mistakes he will understand so this is a power of maharishi ji ;)

@@alokbejai5250 if isn't matching your theory so it's non scientific.. Wow... Bhai Tu yeh maanke ki Mahabharata kal likhi gayi ha..apne aap jo shaant karle 😂😂

History can’t be rewritten in favor of mythology

@@randomperson6141 can understand your ass-pain.

@@randomperson6141 seethe more.

pls check his guru's work..Dr. P V. Vartak from Pune.India

I know what you mean but it sounds like you want to say that Mandala and Nakshatra are made up or meaningless words. Which they're not.

@@archockencanto1645 read properly. I am not playing with words 🙂

Me too sir.

Sahi bole.. jo b thoda history crack karte ha, get killed..we need people like him

जी...बहुत जरुरत है.....

That’s not Anti lefty thought It’s anti scientific thoughts

@@randomperson6141 India knows science thousands years before these europeans Or western colonizers..we know that very well.. Now time to expose... And yes thrse are countering not scientific one.. Rather it is burying the anti india left propagandas

Thanks. All are relevant questions. Please listen to my videos (this one and other) again and multiple times. Also read my blog articles. It answers most of these questions (or it explains why some of them can not be answered with our current technology and/or what additional research needs to be done to answer them). Then, pick one of the above subjects that is most dear to you (and feel passionate about) and start researching on it. And by luck, you may able to to help us all know more about our civilization and the world.

Nilesh Oak Nilesh ji great lecture as always Sir. But Sir I am still waiting for your answers on all the questions I have asked in your blog.

Kesari Chakra, Thank you. Please do read the response I wrote to Sudipto Dey ji above. In addition, I can only respond to the questions for which I have answers and/or as time permits. Here is one man army doing multiple things at the same time. Appreciate your patience.

Nilesh Oak Of course sir. Please take your time. Keep up the great work

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iMuUiZdptKmpdps.html

Harappa and Mohenjadaro aren’t Aryan civilizations ( Painted grey ware) Indus Valley civilization was “black and red ware culture “ Very different civilizations

i agree very powerful

Listen to this talk of mine (multiple times) and other talks of mine, too, until you are convinced that I have not made a single calculation on Yuga. On the other hand I have outlined the serious problems of Yuga theories.