True and i see more and more people with a second job.

A lot more people work shorter hours than when I was growing up. In fact I think the 40-hour work week is only held together artificially in many places.

Inflation is a hella'va thing. Thanks Federal Reserve Act.

And when Bernie tries to reduce the work week, a bunch of losers come out to call him crazy and double down that we need to work EVEN HARDER

yep

I experienced something very similar. Even if you have enough savings to survive a few years, that’s not near enough to stop freaking about your future. I was more stressed jobless than when working full-time because I had no security.

It's why we need something like universal basic income.

UBI really has to become a standard sooner than later. But that would need a functional tax system that hits the rich.

​@@RealShinpinwe need a universal revolution. The public should be the ones profitting off AI since all the knowledge of an AI came from us in the first place. It should be AI working for us, not us starving while the AI works for the companies.

@@winzyl9546 I agree. It should also all be open source.

Finally someone gets it

Great point. Technological advances are inevitable, but how it is implemented is crucial.

Long Live Ned Ludd!!!

Exactly. The Luddites want to make better things, crafts better, and share the knowledge. But the tool is used to make worse things, uncrafts their craftmanship, and monopolizes the business. Those who don't learn history are doomed to repeat it. Just because Safety Regulations are written in blood, doesn't mean I accept someone needs to suffer for people to learn common sense.

@@defaulted9485 well said

It is that simple. Great comment!

I'm back because he is. Period.

I do miss Trevor Noah though 🫤🫤 I'm not saying Jon is not the best host, because he really is. I just miss Trevor Noah, because both of them are the best

Jon Stewart for president! But he's too smart to want that.

@@skellys1948So am I!

Actually an ai that was being developed for “cost cutting” recommended ceos be fired first before anyone else. They rewrote it to no longer consider such positions.

Facts 💯

​​@@rokusho6667The thing A.I. proselytizers and cultists ignore, everything A.I. does is still at the behest of humans at the wheel. And those humans with the most money only care about maximizing profit, not helping humanity.

AI was like the worker in the factory produce the profit. The CEO just produces HR complaints and squanders profit with excessive salary.@@rokusho6667

the letters A and I would vanish from the alphabet

lol, word. We want to replace workers (and their potential jobs) with AI. As many as possible (i.e., create as much unemployment as possible) in order to maximize profit. Then, we are going to want all of these poor, jobless people, with LOTS of free time on their hands, to consume, consume consume with all that money they're mak-. . . . hmmmm. . . .wait a minute. . . .uh-oh.

Its not meant to be that way and it wont. I don't understand the fear of AI. The Ludites who revolted against the industrial revolution back in the 18th century were saying exactly, and I mean exactly, what Jon is saying. That this new fangled technology was coming to take their job and everything would fall apart because of it. While disruptions absolutely did happen in the early industrial revolution people very quickly adapted. Take weavers. One weaver on a machine loom could do 100 times what a traditional weaver could do. Did 99% of weaver jobs disappear? No, the number of weaver jobs increased. The firms that bought industrial looms were able to make more product cheaper and hired even more people to make and sell that product. Markets adjust, its what they do. We should easy that adjustment as much as we can with things like universal basic income and higher taxation of the wealthy, but technology isn't something to always be afraid of.

A.I could help certainly help you. You could use it to look up examples of the fallacy of false equivalence @@TheFireGiver

@@TheFireGiver He mentioned it here, this time automation is not coming in a matter of decades, but months, and to nearly every job except just a few. The life expectation plunged during the IR before plummeting later on. For those displaced, many didn't get to live to see the tech they were replaced with bear fruit for them to enjoy. They died earlier, much of the reasons being the harsh conditions they were subject to, and low pay. Like them, you are in the transition phase, and of something much larger, you can't just imagine yourself a taking 20 year leap in the future from now, looking back, and judging from such a place. You are here for the immense collapse we all will be going through.

​@@TheFireGiverAll that productivity has created a lot of litter and pollution-I mean consumer products and environmental byproducts. Technology might not be the enemy but it's not really been a net positive. We live longer now, and people in the future will surely have a worse quality of life (from things like cellular-level plastics).

Pretty bad take from the teacher. I had someone who asked me how small could phones get, rhetorically and they didn't think they would get thinner ... I said to at least a pane of glass in our lifetime.

They said that about the old MFM drives too. They weren't really for consumers, pretty spendy, and I think the biggest one that you'd "never need" was 20MB formatted. Wasn't even that much back then, as the 8in floppies held 360KB. Lot of money to replace 60 floppies.

My first computer in the late 90s had 3GB of space. My step dad told me ill never need a bigger drive the rest of my life lol.

Well another way of looking at that statement is, how much of that data is an absolute necessity?

Continuity bias in action.

Have on Bassem YOussef next Jon

Oof, your iq is showing

Why ? was MSNBC not making you cult enough ?

It will.

There is a *huge* difference between “using AI, I can do this work twice as fast” and “using AI, this job now takes half the manpower.” It really is about mindset and ethics in an unregulated world, and it’s horrifying how terrible corporations seem to be on both fronts

This. It's obviously nowhere close to ready for prime time, but the tech bros and those they've bamboozled are going to replace jobs with this bug filled crapfest that they're calling AI but is in no way actually intelligent because as it turns out, they don't care if it works, they only care that it's cheaper.

But can it replace Congress?

If I could only Up Vote this more than once. What a great answer!

And what better candidate can manage stock prices? It's the perfect solution!

The only people who are guaranteed not to lose their jobs are executives and members of the board. And why should they, look at the excellent job they have done creating the end of labour AND corporate enterprise.

Sure, Max Headroom for CEO

Maybe that's what it'll take to finally force an Unconditional Basic Income or AI Dividend for all. Traditional "jobs" should not be required for our survival, when AI can and will out compete so many.

Considering the amount of stock they already own I'm sure they would actually be fine with that. All the infinite money glitch but none of the work

🔝 Nailed it.

👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

I want AI to get me a house

All for a subscription of $99.99 a month you can have it.

They would gang up on you and and think you too were a machine ?😧

Henry Ford, the Uber capitalist, paid his people enough so they could buy his cars, and invented the vacation so they would have a reason to drive them. And he didnt even have an MBA, think of that.

EXACTLY!

Rod Serling didn't pull any punches when it came to the moral lessons of his story. We could use someone like him again.

YOU ARE OBSOLETE!

Simple logic and math. Corporations need customers. Apparently that needs to be explained to all the CEO's. I wonder what exactly they learned in business school.

just capitalism things

@@kylezo 🤣 Yeah, they don't give a F____ I've been to some of their houses (they have a separate drive for non-humans) and anyone that owns a Picasso doesn't care about how the tech they use gets made or how much it costs. The only thing they care about is if their *assistant* can use it so they don't have to do anything important at all.

The BS never ends

Yeah, I really miss having a job and self-esteem. Thanks AI!

Silly rabbit, insurance isn't synonymous with healthcare.

Always felt it, needed to say it.

Less work and more bills

Easy there, Che :)

Always about the establishment monied "interests", the "stake-holders", always we the masses vs the entitled few. They are NOT our friends, our allies never have been never will be. Sooner People realize this before it's too late.

Running a GPU server is not so prohibitively expensive that a person can't build it over time on a working salary. Pooled in a community or a coop, you could be building and training your own models with zero influence from corporate AI development. Certainly they'll continue to build bigger and better tech but it doesn't mean that your community scale applications won't improve the means of production for anyone using them compared to what you had before. In your analogy it's still workers developing the technology but having to pass on profits, but it's still the fruit of someone's labor, intellect and expression and won't stop being valuable once property and wealth is reappropriated

That quote is great (and profound)!

On the bright side artists now have an excellent excuse to charge a premium on their art. "Human-made" art will now be defined as luxury goods.

not their problem. because the government will foot the bill for the poor. but companies will also cry "don't tax us more" to cover those expenses greed is horrible sin, and way too popular

That’s why credit cards were introduced

Bingo!

In my experience, the technology stresses out the few workers who remain, not only when they malfunction, but also when companies reduce the workforce faster than the technology can keep up with. Then the employees are forced to be more productive or decrease the quality of their work. Customer satisfaction then decreases and employee burnout increases. Often companies predictions of how technology will effect the workforce and consumers is not accurate. Wishful thinking and focus on stock value are two of the causes. I also think the quality of management is decreasing.

Henry Ford had a take on this…

You got me thinking about when everyone started being nicer to each other on social because "we're all having a hard time dealing with lockdown", I don't think it lasted 2 weeks

Yeah... humans have these things called ego's

Right? You'd think the billionaire class would take a look at the social unrest during the early pandemic when huge numbers of people were out of work and had nothing to do but rage. Their arrogance will be their downfall.

No we had right wingers promote savage individualism

​@@M123XoxoI think we widely misunderstand the number of billionaires - to even talk about a 'class'. There are 136 billionaires in NYC. With a population of 8.5 million. This is pretty much the highest concentration _anywhere_. And for the most part - while their networth is billion+ - that is better thought about as capital or assets, than money. Capital means that it is factories and companies, etc. Very small percentage is actually dollar dollar bills. So these guys certainly have a lot of influence. And because finance is complicated - they can actually get HUGE loans against their assets that are real money. Say the Walton family that owns Walmart. They are not broke. Don't get me wrong. But 90% of their money is in the stores. They can't really access it as liquid cash unless they sell the stores. And who would they sell them to? Arguably if they tried to sell them piecemeal - the value will completely collapse as the market will be flooded. Similarly to ToysRUs and BedBath and Beyond.

He's wrong tho. Being a prompt engineer is a skill and it takes knowledge to do it right

@@TheManinBlack9054 It took me a day to do prompt """"engineering"""". It ain't engineering, it's just basic programming in toddler English.

But prices must come down as people cant afford anything. Millenials cant afford to buy own house? Soon they cant afford to rent one.

No, that's *not* a bigger problem than huge swaths of the workforce being unable to buy food and pay rent.

@@Mutrunalle you think corporations and the rich care?

That’s exactly why they are so excited for it, more profitable overall

The only thing they have to do is appease the shareholders and boost profits. Get ready for the psychopath executives to absolutely crush humanity under their productivity heel

Some of us still need to dig holes or run screws. Even if building a bridge makes less that running a cash till. That's why self check out is a thing and boots are still walking jobsites.

This is the most horrifying part to me-- They skipped right over using AI to make dehumanizing, dangerous, low-paid, and mentally taxing jobs obsolete, and instead went ahead and made every extremely lucrative job that can be done comfortably behind a desk completely redundant. At this rate, it's literally just a matter of time before every one of us who works at a computer is effectively obsolete. And self-driving cars will be gobbling up all the jobs in transportation.

Imagine the world's brain power not bound in financial law for companies, but being used actual useful stuff.

⁠@@nesamdoom The cashier jobs are getting replaced by self service kiosks because big business doesn’t want to pay for the labor. Construction jobs will also one day be replaced with ai. Most likely by a drone or a Boston Dynamics operated by ai. In the end you too will end up servicing the ai somehow

@@Nubby_Nubcakes like pre-fab

Me too. I've never felt so depressed about the future.

And the hard part about that is realizing all the questions you don’t even know to ask and that you kinda need to develop a frame work of types of topics those questions are about so you can at least figure them out upfront

@@DaveE99 Spot on.

I hope AI will remember to say happy birthday....😅

Many happy belated birthdays to you! 🎉

Once was plenty😉

Pretty much. Automating customer service is the worst. The entire reason I'm contacting customer support, is that I have a problem the company neglected to anticipate in their documentation already, and I need a person to understand my question and think outside the box to help resolve it.

Programming is incredibly easy. It's so easy that children under 10 can, and very often do, teach themselves. It's so easy that it's boring, which leads a lot of people to dramatically over complicate simple things, given the illusion of real complexity, when it's really just bad design ... or bad tools ... Just one example of how ridiculous things are these days. Open up VS and start a new console C# project and see how many files and directories are created. It's beyond absurd.

Keep in mind those chatbots have only been around for a few years. Give them another few years, and their improvement will be exponential.

@@recompile i want to learn so badly but i look at it and it feels like a foreign language one that i can't begin to grasp and i've been using a computer since DOS i knew as much as html and then never needed to code again but now i look at C++ and even trying to learn feels insane if it's so easy where do I start

IVR's were bad enough. We gunna end up expanding CR teams to cope with AI complaints

He is one of the few reasons to live in 2024. Jon is a worldwide treasure just like David Attenborough

Exactly! There must be something truly horrible happening this year before I remove it from the top position, simply because of this. I have missed him so much, because not even... a certain English gentleman can bring out that particular sarcasm and irony, like Jon can.

Show of hands who has used Siri in the last month? Yeah that's what I thought.

I haven’t, creeps me out!

@@gvan1090 also, it requires me to buy a phone I don't like to use a service I don't trust. Or if that was vice versa. Or both.

Yikes 🤦🏽‍♂️

​@@JohnnyDelco what? 🙂

Problems are technical, not political. Politicians have no problem solving skills.

And all these years later and things have only gotten worse. WAY WORSE.

I totally misseed the youn Jon Stewart & Colbert😮

Yeah but that's only if you think so much like a human lol

It’s funny how it was the AirBNB CEO that said that, a company that is contributing to ruining the residential real estate market for the middle class across the country. This guy just seems like a misanthropist

you can thank the corporate raiders of the 1970's and the braindead "free market crapitalists" of the last century and a half

It all makes sense now. Conservatives hate taxes, so if employees are a tax, they want to get rid of them. They want them to get paid poverty wages and have terrible health care because it decreases their lifespan and happiness.

@@awill3454 One in five corporate CEOs display psychopathic tendencies.

unless we do something about it now.

Is that ironic? That seems like the logical and practical response.

From the smallest to the largest, any business must produce profit to survive & thrive, so in a world where automation is growing more capable, available & cost effective than human labor, the shift to automation is inevitable as the rising sun & has been coming since the advent of steam power. The question is, how do we handle a world that could see unemployment deep into the double digits if we don't shift focus from old fashioned, anti-intellectual skilled trades to education & skills training in technological fields.

And they will soon be scratching their heads and wondering why no one is buying their products and/or services after they, and all of the other corporations, have replaced their employees with AI, which doesn't buy any products and/or services.

@@erichancock6815 what do you mean by "anti-intellectual skilled trades"?

@@erichancock6815 Seems very short sighted. How will those companies maintain profitability if there is 35% and fewer people can afford their products. American consumers still carry the economy so with AI aren't companies going to just make their customers poorer an unable to buy what they are selling?

Honestly you make an EXCELLENT point for government-based AI infrastructure. It's like a net, that lives in the sky... we could call it... "Skynet"

@@skahler I heard a Japanese company was working on something along those lines. They’re called Arasaka 😂

The only solution is public ownership.

Same people complaining about corporations are the same people advocating for capitalism in it's purest form. Self interest above all... Well, here we are

jesus... all these communists in this comment section, haven't learned anything from history? Collectivism and government doesn't work, that's been proven like 200 years ago. That's why we have private companies so we don't do collectivism

We need more recent people who are totally with it to be in congress. Fast and powerful AI vs. slow old folk (esp republicans) in power... not likely to end well.

​@@chrisrj9871The question asked of Kennedy was not the same as the others.

@@chrisrj9871Haha I love this comment for some reason, like it's lovably simplistic.

I’m going back home now I have a couple things I have a few to take home for you to take home if you’re still up to that let us now I have to run by and grab a few more items and I’ll let the kids out for you and I’ll let them know that I have a lot to take home and then I will head back home to pick them and I can drop the stuff at the office if you’re not up to that and I don’t have any more time for that so let us get back and we will see what you want

Truth! I have to say that's the first time ever that I've agreed with something those last two said. The only people that really know what they're using AI for is those ghouls that are sitting on top of these tech companies. They are truly frightening in how blasé they are about our jobs and lives. Their own lives are already so far removed from the rest of our realities. It's the egos, though, that get me the most, as in "they know what's best for humanity."

"Don't let them turn off the nursery!" Great short story.

They will just change the definition what a person is

@@Jake-mv7yothey’re kinda already doing that with abortion law. Say in some distant future run by AI, the government requires companies to employ a certain amount of humans in order to balance the economy. Well if a clump of cells is to be considered human, then a companies can just have a closet full of human-cell mason jars and let Siri run the show. Who knows

Agreed. Our current economic model doesn't work. You have many folks working two and three jobs and still unable to afford rent and healthcare premiums. At the same time, CEOs have increased their pay to ludicrous amounts. It simply doesn't work

Alright now you’re talking crazy

It should be, but I highly doubt that's how it will play out. The entire reason companies want to implement AI is cost savings / increased profit margins. They don't want to pay employees and the side effects of this aren't their concern.

Agreed. Currently corporations are essentially incentivized to employ fewer people.

This is definitely something that most people don't think about

They'll just increase sales tax.

No one actually has any clue how this system would work. It's all speculation and hope.

@@Boris80b We don't know but we are going full speed ahead anyway

He's baaaaaaaaaack

You probably think north Korea is democratic because they call themselves the "democratic people's republic" dont you? Just cuz they recently started incorrectly calling the same algorithms we've been using for decades "ai" now suddenly its sentient to all you scared dinosaurs huh? You are a fear monger or a coward. Which is it?

Smith said humans were like a virus that had to be eradicated. AI will come to the very same conclusion. "Connor? Sara Connor?"

AI is best suited to replace simple decision jobs like executive and management positions.

Totally agree, CEOs are the most expensive and unimportant part of any company

@@chernobyl169 This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard LOL. "Decision making" is one of the most important aspects of a job and you definitely want a person, or a board of people, deciding what happens in a company. One wrong decision by an AI could tank your company. The most replaceable jobs at a company are the repetitive jobs, particular jobs that involve a computer and are also repetitive and non-creative. Decision making is inherently creative. All the data filers and paper pushers and phone callers can be replaced because that's a repetitive job that's already done on a computer. The jobs that will remain after the AI revolution IS ALWAYS going to be the decision-makers, and physical laborers.

​@@swickens930If companies with AI CEOs perform better than companies with humans at the helm, then guess what happens? Decision making taking in as many variables as possible is where AI shines in its usefulness.

@@anonymous12345678935 "If companies with AI CEOs perform better, guess what?" Well, they don't, and you have no data to support the claim that AI CEOs can run a better company than a human CEO

He's using a simple home system that can control when the toaster is powered in the morning - certainly not a particularly useful application but the same technology would be used for more advanced AI scheduling systems.

But imagine all the possibilities when your toaster tells you your toast is ready after you already heard it pop up!

FYI, that video is 5-6 or more than that years old....its just a voice assistant not AI

@@lif6737 LOL so true!

Cute propaganda for the AI surveillance, censorship, and propaganda industrial complex.

That was best show ever, you just answered all of my questions about AI. I’m just wondering if you could get us an address to order the picture on the back of the truck. My truck would love one of those.

Great, but how are people supposed to earn money to finance this "self-actualizing"?

Now they have convinced junior lever programmers that AI is the newest tech that's going to be the future so they need to work to improve it or they will be left behind... it's the greatest bait and switch of all time and I dont understand why so many people in the industry are excited about making their own jobs redundant. Also, notice how no one is trying to replace middle management or C level executives... oh, we can't replace humans who scold people for being late or deciding what font to use on the company logo. Those jobs can't be done by AI🤣

Until you realize you’re expendable

Just making sure: we all understand sarcasm here. Right?

It might be hard to regulate.

No problem, just create some more AI to regulate the AI. 🤪

It’s not a thought. That is the reality of capital. Capitalism

That's the entire crux of the problem. I think Jon missed a massive opportunity here to discuss the social, economic, and political implications about what needs to change very VERY soon so that all of us can share in the profits of this tech. The people who own the machines will own the world, and if that isn't all of us collectively, our society will go through some very violent revolutions

So your solution is socialism?

No, the problem is that who has the exclusive COMMERCIAL RIGHT to use INFORMATION on how such a machine works can EXCLUDE any competitor from using this principle to offer same product.. this is called a monopol and based on the RULES about INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, not who actually owns a bit of matter in a certain configuration (machine). Our POLITICAL SYSTEMS create and maintain those rules, rules that benefit a few at the cost of the rest.

it's not the machine, it's the information about how it works (IP) that prevents COMPETITORS from offering similar machines (And product) which would increase the supply until it meets demand AT COST. With AI-Robots doing everything this cost would be ZERO. IP (Patents, Copyright) are rules that prohibit competition from doing it's job.

Hold on. The wheel is going too far.

where does the printing press go??

what do you need wheels for? you don't have a job to get to.

and sliced bread

And paper towels.

Ha it happens to me too

Sorry to hear that. What are you going to do next? Btw, which language(s) were you translating?

Just got to get him going the rest of the week

/upvotex10

my stomach hurts from laughing so hard

Clown show for a clown narrative

Comedy writes itself these days

You know this is AI Jon, right

I used to wake up each morning and watch him from the previous night. It got me thru a bad marriage.

Who’s we?

It’ll be a joy when Jon is reporting in November 2024.

FFS run for President and save your country

Or in a private prison

Yes!! There are so many thing's wrong , dubious and, regarding the stealing of human's work, downright immoral with machine learning ( "Artificial Intelligence" doesn't exist) . I hope the human creators win all their law suits.

That's what they've all got coming. AI bros are no different from Crypo-bros and NFT-bros. They look at new tech, think it's going to make them big bucks and fail miserably most of the time.

yea chatgpt couldn't design test cases addressing user misuse of a model app that I described to it in a detailed prompt....it can't possibly predict how people might behave in the future. There's just an ingenuity that we have that AI as we know it might never have (not for a while at least). Example is: I asked it to make a test case to check the state of every attribute for every document was being handled in a proper sequence so that attributes would only be mutable within certain conditions/time limits (ChatGPT didn't know that such misuse behavior would play out in such a way in the code.....I had to think about how it would work).

Universal Basic Income NOW

AI is utter garbage. It's just there to manipulate.

Another thing I feel they should consider, if all the workers have their jobs taken its suddenly a lot easier for us all to protest with all this time on our hands. Peacefully or not (in theory).

I wish more CEO's understood this point. The fact that the 1% saw nothing wrong with decimating the middle class means they don't really understand how an economy works. Without jobs, there are no consumers. Times were booming for business when the middle class was robust. Now it is in decline, and the rush to increase profits by reducing the workforce/wages/taxes is a fools errand.

It’s like if the company that makes “grape” whistles was really successful, they’d put themselves out of business

Step 3: ... Step 4: profit

Unfortunately, the type of CEO who will gladly sacrifice the jobs and financial security of everyone they employ for a fully automated workforce is the type of CEO who doesn't concern themselves with what happens to everyone after the fact. By the time this becomes a dominant issue for the world to address, they will have collected their golden parachute and retired to some exclusive getaway to spend their billions.

If they paid every American a living wage out of their own pocket, l see no problem why AI shouldn't take over. Which is why it never will. Any moderately rich person would rather swim with sharks than spend a cent on others.

Because they make enough of a living off everyone else's work to not live in the real world. Why not just rent out your second and third homes?

@@TheDanishGuyReviews You sound hella poor bro. This is some "I live in my mom's basement," type commy stuff

UBI. Most tech bros are in favour of it cause it gives the responsibility to the government and realistically it is the solution. If only our governments weren't completely broken and useless.

​You mean humans

😂😂Hilarious

Nice!! 😁👌

The SWDM job was supposed to be replaced by self driving vehicles already but that bit of science fiction is proving to be a bridge too hard to cross, because roads are too dynamic for AI vehicles...

@@petesmittI suspect this is gonna be the case for a lot of the jobs people think AI is going to replace too. Unless you are building a ridiculously simple, predictable product your product development team will probably never be replaceable. Maybe a few less interns and entry level engineers, but advanced work is not going away.

​@@ssgg23never is a long time and never is a very confident prediction.

We're seeing it now. Look at how many layoffs the tech sector has done while recording record profits. 100s of thousands of jobs gone already.

Then still get denied for jobs since you don’t have experience in the field.

doesn't that mean the problem is with the education process... not necessarily the new technology...

@@joshuaohuka7719 no. Because some people aren’t built to write code.

@@joshuaohuka7719It can, in fact, be two things.

@@roguej2 oh! Random insults? Are you 8 years old?

Companies started experimenting 4-days weeks about 10 years ago, and we, as the world are nowhere with that. Someone telling me "in a hundred years" is equivalent to me "I can't be accountable for what I'm saying"

Concentration of wealth may have more to do with capitalism and markets and the political systems that prop them up. There are political models that prioritize more equitable distribution of the wealth generated by workers performing services. Those are currently villainized by those in power interest in the status quo.

Einstein also wrote an essay in a magazine about how computers and robots would eventually enable to people to work less and receive a share of the profits distributed across society. Bernie Sanders and even Mark Cuban have proposed similar ideas, but they go nowhere.

At least Keynes was half right: in the 1920s, people still worked 6 days a week, 10-14 hours per day. The 40-hr work week was begat by collective bargaining of UNIONS ... yes, those hated entities that have given the complete morons the time to gripe. This is a reality the Republican Dixy Voter won't ever understand.

@@MinekEzQM France has started a 4-day week and UK is experimenting with it. Can't see the US taking it on though - they don't even get maternity leave!!!

Once AGI is achieved it is only natural that a UBI (Universal basic income) would have to be established and it would be funded via tax on additional productivity

I suspect they don't know or care. It's about making their company's stocks go up for the short term or whatever. Then when it goes under they take a golden parachute and literally never look back.

That is a genuine problem that literally does not factor in

@@EricLing64 this technology is real which is why so many investors are behind it, AI researchers (not ceos) estimate we will have AGI by 2047

AI going to be so great and take over all our jobs then why do we need to raise the retirement age why don't we lower it.

Michael Jordan played five seasons without Scottie Pippen 84-85 38-44..First round exit 85-86. 30-52..First round exit 86-87. 40-42...First round exit 01-02. 37-45..out of playoffs 02-03. 37-45..out of playoffs Lebron james has won more playoff Series' than any player in NBA HISTORY Lebron james has been to 10 nba finals. Only Bill Russell and Sam Jones (in a mostly nine team league) have made more nba finals appearances LeBron james carried an absolutely horrific 2007 Cleveland Cavaliers team to the nba finals In the modern NBA era (post 1960) only nine NBA top 75 players have won a championship without another top 75 player as a teammate Rick Barry (1975) Bill Walton (1977) Hakeem Olajuwon (1994) Tim Duncan (2005) (2007) Kobe Bryant (2009) (2010) Steph Curry (2015) (2022) LeBron james (2016) Kawhi Leonard (2019) Giannis Antetokounmpo (2021) As you can see, LeBron James is on the list and Michael Jordan isnt Lebron james has won 17 playoff series, without an nba top 75 teammate. Michael Jordan won ZERO In the year before Michael Jordan and LeBron James joined their team and the year after they left their team, their records were 83-84 bulls 27-55 84-85 bulls. 38-44 92-93 bulls 57-25 93-94 bulls 55-27 98-99 bulls 13-37 without Scottie Pippen 00-01 wizards 19-63 01-02 wizards. 37-45 02-03 wizards 37-45 03-04 wizards 25-57 02-03 cavaliers 17-65 03-04 cavaliers 35-47 09-10 cavaliers 61-21 10-11 cavaliers 19-63 09-10 heat. 47-35 10-11 heat 58-24 14-15 heat 37-45 2013-14 cavaliers 33-49 2014-15 cavaliers 53-29 2017- 18 cavaliers 50-32 2018-19 cavaliers 19-63 2017-18 lakers. 35-47 2018-19 lakers were 20-14 when LeBron James got injured on Christmas day. As you can see When LeBron James joins a team, the team improves more than Michael Jordan and when LeBron James leaves a team, the team always goes into the tank. Michael Jordan, excluding the 94-97 seasons, when the NBA moved the three point line to 22 feet, was a career 28% three point shooter. LeBron James is a career 34% three point shooter Michael Jordan was a great defensive player, in an Era where you could handcheck. Playing defense is much easier when you can handcheck. For nearly 6'9 250 LeBron James' entire career he wasn't afforded the opportunity to handcheck. THE EVIDENCE IS CLEAR..LEBRON JAMES IS THE GOAT!!!!! I have added a Postscript So many have replied, that LeBron james didn't make the playoffs his first two years and Jordan did. What they fail to say is, in 1985, 16 of 23 teams made the playoffs. In 2004, 16 of 29 teams made the playoffs. It was MUCH EASIER to make the playoffs in 1985, as opposed to 2004. Perfect example is, the 1985 86 bulls went 30-52 and made the playoffs and the 2004 05 cavaliers went 42-40 and did not make the playoffs. Also, I don't know, possibly, maybe, Jordan had a HUGE ADVANTAGE considering he played three years of college basketball and LeBron James was 19 years old, and straight out of high school

@@vicepresidentmikepence889 ------Just....why?

What’s most bizarre about the unprovoked Lebron-v-Jordan rant is that two people gave it a thumb’s up.

@@michaelj.beglinjr.2804 bots are gonna bot

He is so msm now, he fell in line like a little obedient boy

​@@fuserush3733 you sound like quite the free thinker

@@fuserush3733 Doesnt fall in line on gaza/AI/Biden... Yeah buddy, really just a mirror image of all the CNN and MSNBC drones... Try developing your own opinions instead of just repeating what you get told to say

BTW, Jon Stewart over valued a property by x 800 times it's value, did actually use it fraudulently and unlike Trump who never had trouble paying anything Stewart still hasn't repaid, and this was a long time ago.

He’s a bumbling idiot

don't do anything illegal or criminal

I've heard something similar "When you're young you have so much time do anything you want but no money, and as an adult you have money but no time to do everything you want."

​@@Igniriumand now that I'm an adult, my landlord has all my money and I have no time to do anything 😬

Yeah, the billionaire CEOs forgot about the "no money" part.

@@MadameDex ...probably because they grew up so wealthy that they can't conceive of the concept of not having enough money to live on.

my favourite part of going to a comedy show is the preaching

@@zatgeye7320 We already have too many clowns and need a humorous pastor

@@yuan-huishang I prefer people who tell jokes. Ya know, a set up and a punchline. I leave the preaching to the preachers.

@@zatgeye7320 So, in other words, you have no depth of mind and lack any humor or critical thinking skills

It's not preaching, it's pointing out the actual reality and utter absurdity of the times we live in. The government and news media are corporations run by short-sighted individuals who assume that everyone is an idiot. They're only right in that assumption about those who listen to them and take them seriously.

Look man some jobs just don't exist forever. I'm sure a lot of blacksmiths were bummed about the invention of the car.

​@@jaytotheareokay The car wasn't invented until 1886. They didn't become popular until the 1940s so Blacksmiths weren't affected by it's invention. It wouldn't have bothered them for at least another 60 years.

​@@jaytotheareokayYes, but the issue isn't jobs becoming obsolete, the issue is a) the scale and speed at which AI may do that in one go being unprecedented and b) particularly given the scale and speed, the better understanding of global economics and the free market capitalist society we largely have today, how will we cater for mass unemployment. It's not as simple as saying retrain, that has individual and economic cost implications which are unsustainable, but also retrain into what? It would have to be a vaguely comparably paid job to not cause massive economic issues and those are already taken, there isn't just a whole unserviced skilled or semi skilled job market just waiting with open arms to accept the victims of the AI productivity revolution. Maybe new companies will spring up with the wealth of potential employees on the market but that takes time and how do those people pay their mortgages/rent or buy food while they wait for new companies to grow and need their original or retrained skills? And what happens to all the profit from companies now being able to get more done with less people? Does that get reinvested into the economy in some way that helps retrain or support those victims of the mass job losses? Unlkely in our current society, it just goes to making the rich richer. A better solution to needing less people to do the same volume of work would be to take a small portion of the increased output as increased profitability of the business and then use the rest to allow improved working conditions for your staff, reduced hours, increased pay etc. as that means those individuals will have more disposable time and income to spend in the economy and in turn will increase demand for the majority of goods and services which is what drives the companies to be able to make more profit.

@@simonb4757 Sounds like you're contemplating the horrors of late stage capitalism, regardless of how we get there. Maybe that system should change.

@@abegarfield7031 and the profession fell off during the industrial revolution, so before the car was invented.

Why put effort towards improving those useful ends when you can scam idiots by stealing artwork that isn't yours and selling it as a hideous blob?

But the useful uses are the only ones that will win out. I don't get why people are so upset. Every single technological advance caused people to predict mass unemployment. It didn't happen when industrialization improved productivity 1000%. Why would it happen when AI improves productivity by, say, 100%

Computer engineers are developing AI and refining it to perform ever more complex tasks in a bid to approximate human reasoning, discernment, judgment and discretion. Business are taking the product and having these tech guys, to whom big corp is dangling big payouts, customize AI to replace workers. Robotic and automation is eliminating labor jobs and AI will erode the administrative, clerical and first tier analytics jobs. It's going to be a very different employment landscape in 5 years.

Right ? I work in a hospital and I can't begin to tell you how freaking useful it would be to use AI. There's so much information and we're understaffed anyway, it would be so useful to have a tool that would help us coordinate everything. Like, you see the patient is behaving weird ? AI will give you automatically all the reasons that might explain this behaviour and ask you if you want to notify so and so. This patient is in a critical state, AI immediately gives you the patient's wishes (do they want to be reanimated, who should you call, do they want to donate their bodies to science etc...) But nooooooo let's develop AI in order to duplicate artists voices and make them write soulless songs

@@TheFireGiver because if you think about this more critically, it’s not just “can a job be replaced with another job,” it’s “what jobs are replacing the old jobs?” A lot of new jobs in the industrial revolution didn’t require a high barrier to entry and they were easy to retrain workers for. AI can or will be able to mentally exceed humans in all capacity. What are humans supposed to retrain for? Especially when it replaces manual labor jobs, it’s going to be very hard to retrain tradesmen to become AI devs…not because tradesmen are dumb, but it’s a completely different field that only a few people even today can comprehend, and it takes years to master or even become proficient in. It’s not like you’re putting down a shovel and taking a position on the factory line. The rift between skills will be massive. Who is even going to invest in mass retraining? And with so many people retraining for the same things, there will be brutal competition for jobs. You don’t need that many AI devs per company. It’s not just creating jobs to replace old jobs. It is creating a system to replace human thinking. There won’t be new jobs, there just…won’t be jobs. At least, not for a lot of people.

I came to this video from a Nuclear Fusion video. Pretty sure Fusion is better. AI is nothing more than a convenience tool.

Just another tool to make us more lazier fatter and less engaged. And when they take over your jobs and you're unemployed I'm sure you'll believe they're the greatest technology advancement of the universe.

@@thhorwitz1 Fusion would be a game-changer. AI could be a game over

@@enviritas9498I mean nuclear fusion could also be a game over, all scientific progress can result in a game over for society, doesn’t mean we should still be a bunch of Hunter gatherers.

@@thhorwitz1 Wait until AI solves nuclear fusion for us 😏

True. Movie AI is a digital living being. Real AI is just a language model -- a clever math trick with words instead of numbers. Even the ones released by Microsoft and Google can't do basic math.

Ignoring that at the rate we're going, within the next decade AI will be designing purpose built machines that can climb those poles and do your job faster and cheaper in minutes, your job really isn't as secure as you think. For one, you literally rely on us having powerlines 40 feet up that are unreliable enough to need frequent repair - an ongoing cost. If investing in more reliable power lines that can be installed and maintained by machines costs less than keeping you employed for the next decade or so you can expect to be obsoleted.

@@helloyes2288 Just like cold fusion was "right around the corner" and "imminent" in the 1980's? The hype around AI is to generate sales, but it's way over-hyped. AI may do that... in another 50-100 years...

So if ai is doing the work for us we can all get paid a percentage from each employed AI and still buy food and medicine so we can explore ourselves correct?

​@@pata6129...........sure

@@pata6129 This is the way we were told things would play out at the World's Fair future displays in the 1930's and 40's. Unfortunately, time and reality have proved something very different.

@@termsofusepolice yeah no flying cars

​@@pata6129drunk drivers are bad enough, could you imagine them with cars that fly? Correction, with cars that fly *by design*

And Rachel.

It's like any gold rush. By the time you hear about it, it's already too late.

I got a ph.d. in a totally random humanities discipline, nobody said I would get a job, everybody said things like 'become a computer science major'. Now I'm tenured at an Ivy League school. The irony is it's so stressful, some days I wish I had done computer science so I could be some tech guy who works from the beach on their laptop.

How is being an athlete relevant to a potential employer? Which jobs combine computer science and sports?

Yeah. Something Trevor Noah couldn't replicate or even remotely come close to.

One of a kind

Tools