SHG nulling a penalty is egregious. 3,2,1,0 truly reflects a team's season and efforts.
@PawpiChoolo6 ай бұрын
Nah. If you don’t protect the puck with an extra man, you should lose your PP.
@spikeey2286 ай бұрын
@@PawpiChoolo penalty is because a player did something wrong it's not just an extra man
@OplzStretchy6 ай бұрын
@@spikeey228then keep the player in the box and still go back to even strength
@goavs29928 ай бұрын
I think the nhl should only add the 3,2,1,0 Edit: MOM IM FAMOUS
@TuckHockey18 ай бұрын
Yeah I agree with you
@scottchannel17828 ай бұрын
Same here
@514Gref8 ай бұрын
fck no…if it aint broke dont fix it
@samhaufe12708 ай бұрын
Nah, overtime is the most fun time of the game. Same with shootout
@cornad988 ай бұрын
I think that that makes it too confusing
@aaronl197 ай бұрын
My theory for the short-handed rule is that currently, women’s hockey is about defence. So I believe it’s trying to generate some more offence both for the defensive and offensive side on a penalty
@antonforsman80997 ай бұрын
They do this already in the european chl. A 2 is a full 2 even if you score too. Penalty shots is with an added 2 for the foul.
@christophera26067 ай бұрын
The 3-2-1 points have been standard in the Swedish League, SHL for ages and I always thought it was much better than the NHL point system.
@yourordinarytwathere87896 ай бұрын
In all european top leagues basically north america is the only place where thay use 2-1-0
@JamesW-sn5vu8 ай бұрын
shorthanded goal is ridiculous. removes the whole advantage of having been given a penalty. Points changes make sense
@cameronvanholstyn44887 ай бұрын
Wym?!?!? They still have a player advantage as long as they don't give up a shorty which isn't that much to ask I think it's a great idea
@thezachster12347 ай бұрын
I’m in favor of the change. It obviously removes the advantage…you also just got scored on so the team needs to fix it. It encourages more aggression from both teams.
@cameronvanholstyn44887 ай бұрын
@@thezachster1234 it doesn't remove any advantage the team still has an extra man as long as they don't get scored on
@WybornD407 ай бұрын
literally how does it remove the advantage
@runa_70227 ай бұрын
what
@19DannyBoy658 ай бұрын
Not sure how I feel about the SHG rule yet, but I am a huge fan of the 3-2-1-0. Really hope this league succeeds (and expands into Edmonton)
@shootstraight917 ай бұрын
my hope is all NHL teams to get their own sister team, that would be legit!
@9The0Unknown77 ай бұрын
No more expansions are needed. Each side has 16. It’s perfect.
@19DannyBoy657 ай бұрын
@@9The0Unknown7 The PWHL has 6 teams.
@Bigmakpaddywack7 ай бұрын
@@19DannyBoy65 there will never be enough interest to expand any further than they already are.. watched a game, very boring
@brendanjames75517 ай бұрын
@@shootstraight91 I would prefer they grow their league and their revenue. The NBA has the whole sister team thing, they make WAY more money than the NHL, and the NBA has to spend so much money propping up their sister league. We should not be starting leagues paired to already successful ones. They can get advertising free maybe from them, but the minute that successful team is bankrolling their expenses before they've seen how the league will perform, thats how you end up with the WNBA where some players feel they deserve to be paid more, but they aren't bringing in that money. The NBA affiliate is paying the salary. That model won't work with the NHL. They need to start small, grow their own league, and push for it to be successful without relying on NHL teams to bankroll it.
@spennypayne7 ай бұрын
3,2,1 makes sense. It’s really noticeable how bad the current system is near the end of season when teams are chasing for a playoff spot. The current system sees a game go from being valued at 2 points, to all of a sudden being more valuable in overtime. Games should have the same point value total regardless in my opinion.
@ghost_6157 ай бұрын
The shorthanded goal rule is awesome. They even call it jailbreaking. That's just freaking fun, man!
@jois97867 ай бұрын
The shorthand rule is ludicrous… it’s making penalties an out of proportion punishment. This makes them way too overpowered. Penalties should be about punishing the player not victimising the whole team. It’s just ridiculous
@user-ht9tv8lh1r8 ай бұрын
I like the 3,2,1,0 rule
@yogibearstie7 ай бұрын
A couple of years ago TheHockeyGuy applied the 3 2 1 0 to the season and it made almost no difference to teams placement.
@tigermask76227 ай бұрын
I did the math in the east and the Leafs and Flyers would drop out of the playoffs and the Redwings and Lightning get bumped into the top 8. The other 6 top teams stay the same but the seedings changed for every team other than Carolina which is 4th in both systems. So its not drastic but it would alter things (according to my quick math).
@jonmendelson11047 ай бұрын
I'm pretty sure he didn't apply it, but I posted it on his discord as well as in the comments under a few of his videos where he's mentioned it. The one thing that's not factored in (and can't be) by doing the numbers after the fact is it changing how teams play late in tie games. With the current system a team isn't willing to take risks late and would rather lock up 1 point before playing for the 2nd. With the 3-2-1 system you can no longer get the maximum amount of points once overtime starts so teams are incentivized to try to score the winner in regulation. Likewise with a purely win/loss standings, teams might not have the added incentive of lost points at the start of OT but they don't have the incentive of guaranteed points for making it there...instead their decision of how to play would be based on if they think they have a better chance of winning in OT/SO vs in regulation. I still have the full numbers from the 21-22 season... The only change in the playoffs, outside of home ice advantage in various rounds, is from swapping the wildcard teams in the west so COL vs DAL, CGY vs NSH instead of COL vs NSH, CGY vs DAL. Final standings, 3-2-1 (regulation win/OT or SO win/OT or SO loss): COL: 165 -> up 1 (home ice cup final vs FLA) C1 FLA: 164 -> down 1 (road cup final vs COL) A1 CAR: 163 -> M1 TOR: 160 -> A2 CGY: 155 -> up 1 (home ice conference final vs MIN) P1 NYR: 154 -> up 1 (home ice cup final vs MIN) M2 STL: 152 -> up 2 (home ice 1st round vs MIN, cup final vs TBL) C2 MIN: 150 -> down 3 (road 1st round vs STL, road conference final vs CGY, road cup final vs NYR) C3 TBL: 149 -> down 1 (road cup final vs STL) A3 BOS: 147 -> EWC1 EDM: 142 -> P2 PIT: 140 -> M3 WSH: 135 -> EWC2 LAK: 134 -> P2 NSH: 132 -> up 1, WWC1 (play CGY instead of COL) DAL: 129 -> down 1, WWC2 (play COL instead of CGY) VGK: 128 -> still miss playoffs VAN: 124 WPG: 121 NYI: 118 CBJ: 107 BUF: 100 -> up 2 OTT: 99 -> up 3 SJS: 99 -> down 2 ANA: 98 -> down 2 DET: 95 CHI: 84 SEA: 83 -> up 2 NJD: 82 -> down 1 PHI: 81 -> down 1 ARI: 75 MON: 71 From a purely win/loss standings, aside from home ice, BOS jumps into the 3rd spot in the Atlantic so they play TOR in the first round and TBL falls to the top wildcard and plays CAR. Purely win/loss standings: FLA: 58-24 -> A1 COL: 56-26 -> C1 CAR: 54-28 -> M1 TOR: 54-28 -> A2 MIN: 53-29 -> C2 NYR: 52-30 -> up 1 (home ice in cup final vs CGY) M2 BOS: 51-31 -> up 3 (A3 instead of EWC1, play TOR in the 1st round instead of CAR, home ice in ECF vs TBL or STL, home ice cup final vs BOS) TBL: 51-31 -> up 1 (EWC1 instead of A3, play CAR in 1st round instead of TOR, road vs BOS in ECF, home ice in cup final vs CGY) CGY: 50-32 -> down 1 (road in cup final vs NYR, BOS, or TBL) P1 STL: 49-33 -> down 1 (road in cup final vs BOS) EDM: 49-33 -> P2 PIT: 46-36 -> M3 DAL: 46-36 -> up 2 (home ice vs LA in 2nd round or WSH in cup final) WWC1 NSH: 45-37 -> up 2 (home ice vs LA in WCF or WSH in cup final) WWC2 LAK: 44-38 -> (home ice cup final vs WSH, road vs NSH in WCF, road vs DAL in 2nd round) WSH: 44-38 -> down 2 (road in cup final vs LAK or DAL) VGK: 43-39 -> 1st team missing playoffs VAN: 40-42 WPG: 39-43 NYI: 37-45 CBJ: 37-45 OTT: 33-49 -> up 4 BUF: 32-50 -> up 1 SJS: 32-50 -> down 2 DET: 32-50 ANA: 31-51 -> down 3 CHI: 28-54 SEA: 27-55 -> up 2 NJD: 27-55 -> down 1 PHI: 25-57 -> down 1 ARI: 25-57 MON: 22-60
@EliteRen8 ай бұрын
The first one is great especially when your short handed and down by a goal
@jacklettuce_998 ай бұрын
Nah cuz u need to get penalized for a penalty, just scoring on its own is a reward but they should stick out the penalty. I think maybe they could switch the time in the box to 1:30 but idk
@bestbyng8 ай бұрын
@@jacklettuce_99maybe an alternative would be to end the penalty and the advantage but let the player sit for the rest of the penalty
@alexalmostfamouslaft25438 ай бұрын
@@jacklettuce_99 I see your point and honestly can’t disagree. But in the other way it would lead to having more strategy and more goals on both side since playing more offensively in 4vs5 would lead to pressure breaking and more change-ups which would lead to more dynamic for both side of the powerplay. Taking 30 seconds from a 2 minutes and 1:15 from a 5 from non misconduct penalties seems to be fair to me.
@sandshark27 ай бұрын
@@bestbyngthats actually a good idea, ending the deficit but keeping the individual punishment
@dudelove697 ай бұрын
@@alexalmostfamouslaft2543everything u jusst said is braindead, u just made everyone who read that alot dumber. Thanx alot
@iownzurk4 ай бұрын
That hit in the intro was wild🗣️💯🔥
@sandshark27 ай бұрын
Idiots who dont understand the penalty kill: it gives incentive for the penalty-team to still try and score, meaning less defense and more mistakes for the attacking team to leverage. Additionally it stops constant icing which is boring, and stops the disappointing expectation that a penalty = a future goal. As we saw with the last 3 games, it doesnt stop the fun or the advantage
@brendanjames75517 ай бұрын
Yes, but in the NHL it also means players take a ton more liberties with opposing players, aren't as careful, more injuries, star players get head hunted and so on. It isnt a rule that will work for the NHL. A penalty is meant to be a punishment stopping a team from trying to drive offense, not a "score and you get off free" rule
@arizimal8 ай бұрын
Both rule additions are great
@Penny12488 ай бұрын
NHL team vs PWHL team NHL is always short handed
@c.jarmstrong31117 ай бұрын
NHL already has an issue with defensive focus, i see the SHG rule just making it worse. Goo rule of encourage more offense in the womans game though. The 3 2 1 0 point scheme just makes sense, my late grandfather would rant like 10 years ago about how stupid it was for different game outcomes to be worth different amount of points
@Ajcutzz178 ай бұрын
Nah this league might actually do something, ain’t bad to watch ngl
@RemetherGaming7 ай бұрын
I just want them to go back to the previous playoff format. The current one really sucks. It always has
@danieldouglas64877 ай бұрын
Penalties are a punishment. So this rule is saying that if your team scores you don't deserve your penalty anymore. That is very weird and i don't really understand what problem caused them to think a change was needed. The points change is an awesome one tho definitely makes way more sense.
@owenlacroix92767 ай бұрын
I was there! As a photographer it was so cool!!
@southernprideperformance29517 ай бұрын
Point changes, yes please. I would also favor a change to OT to make shootouts less common. Even if it’s just a 10 minute 3 on 3 instead of 5 minutes. The shootout sucks beyond the initial novelty of it. It’s the equivalent of a basketball game being ended by a 3 point contest.
@sa1rasta7 ай бұрын
The 3,2,1,0 point rule is in use in Finland and I think it would be a good add to the NHL
@dragorank81677 ай бұрын
Yeah also in Germany
@christopher24877 ай бұрын
It is used in all of europe I think
@jonmendelson11047 ай бұрын
I've run the numbers a few times at the end of seasons and it really makes minimal differences in the standings when doing it after the fact. Of course the major difference would be how teams play when tied late in a game. Right now once you reach OT you're guaranteed a point and still have a chance at getting the maximum number (2) of points. If the rule was changed, teams would likely be more willing to take risks since they know once it reaches OT they can no longer get all 3 points.
@sketched54327 ай бұрын
the penalty rule is maybe a little silly, but it was so hype watching the TOR@NY game and having TOR expire a PK early. encourages the PP to play smarter and the PK to not just stand around. keeps it entertaining all around
@anthonys38927 ай бұрын
I actually do like the penalty kill rule because of what you said about McDavid and Draisaitl. It would be a lot more intense on both ends of the ice if teams start deciding to leave a pure scoring winger out there on PKs. If this rule was the norm, I feel like people wouldn’t want it changed to what it currently is.
@yimpster277 ай бұрын
a win is a win. winning in OT should not count less than a regulation win for any purpose besides tie breaking scenarios.
@TheChezz488 ай бұрын
The NHL can't even get 1-8 seeding correct, imagine them making actual positive changes, ridiculous.
@Turtle97757 ай бұрын
What do you mean? The wild card is pretty simple
@mikekaplan8 ай бұрын
I would love to see them implement both of these rules. Unfortunately they won't because they make sense.
@_Miles25_7 ай бұрын
The shorthanded goal one is kinda dumb but the points one isn't bad
@destro97537 ай бұрын
The short handed one is stupid and gives the team who received a penalty a bonus for no reason
@andrewioannou63187 ай бұрын
How does the shorthanded ruke make sense
@rosshugecaulk7 ай бұрын
@@destro9753how does it reward them? What bonus do they get? Playing with 4 players instead of 5? It just ends the penalty quicker, which is deserved if you can score shorthanded.
@destro97537 ай бұрын
@@rosshugecaulk the team that got penalized doesn’t have to deal with the penalty that they got by doing something against the rules. It’d be like letting someone who robbed a store off with a warning as long as they already sold the items they stole. They’re getting a bonus by scoring and the rule that they broke is getting undone as well.
@hughmungus_6987 ай бұрын
It’ll last 2 seasons max before the league is bankrupt. All professional women’s leagues in team sports are financially propped up by men’s leagues, the WNBA would have folded years ago if not for the financial assistance they get from the NBA. Here in the UK the WSL is propped up by the Premier League, the press releases state the average attendance of a WSL game is 6,000….its not most of those are corporate tickets given to sponsors, the actual SOLD tickets are less than 1500. Now those leagues have the money to support those pro women’s leagues, the NHL does not. 2 years max and that’s being generous
@PhallaS7 ай бұрын
You gonna have less offensive people on defense when they on the power play. They gonna be more careful even when it is their power play to not give up a shorty. I think it’s bad because what promotes more scoring a chance to get rid of a penalty and score a shorty or scoring on a power play with no consequences.
@patrickhopkins56267 ай бұрын
Short hand goal makes sense, but only because I played lacrosse, and the penalty releases if the team tat is man-up scores.
@doodlemavrak42947 ай бұрын
The Nhl needs a 20 mins o.t. with 4 on 4 for the first 10 and then 3 on 3. Exciting o.t. periods
@JDubs998 ай бұрын
I'm excited to see what happens. It is nice to see women getting a platform to show their skills.
@JesusKing_198 ай бұрын
THANK YOU! It’s about time more than ten fans including players parents show up to a game. Women’s hockey isn’t respected enough.
@2buxaslice6 ай бұрын
I hate that teams get points for losing. There should be no overtime loss point.
@RustyMcDusty7 ай бұрын
I still think it should be 3 for regulation win, 2 for OT win, 1 for shootout win (or just get rid of the shootout), and 0 for a loss. Shouldnt get any points for losing, in my opinion
@OrionPax-Edits8 ай бұрын
I think the 3,2,1 is good
@Coach_558 ай бұрын
The penalty one
@owen_som7 ай бұрын
Honestly the biggest thing for the women’s game is allowing hitting. We can finally see these women play real hockey
@sportandtr7 ай бұрын
The 3,2,1,0 point system is just an old European ice hockey point system.
@nickpearson34197 ай бұрын
If I wanted to watch women’s professional quality hockey, I just go to a high school men’s game. At least there still be bodychecking.
@williamhrivnak73457 ай бұрын
I think instead of doing 3,2,1,0 they should instead get rid of shootouts and play 3-on-3 indefinitely until someone scores. With so few players someone is bound to score in a reasonable amount of time even if it takes a little longer than 5 minutes. I’m willing to bet every game that goes to shootout would have been wrapped out way sooner if they kept doing 3 on 3 past 5 minutes
@jonmendelson11047 ай бұрын
The NHLPA would never agree to that. Extra play with no additional pay.
@spqdallas6 ай бұрын
I like both. I would also like the NHL to eliminate the rule by which the refs stop play if they lose sight of the puck. It is the worst rule in all of sports. It's ambiguous and unnecessary.
@BlueFlash257 ай бұрын
I would like to see those two rules in the NHL.
@JDSOLOS28 ай бұрын
New York winning the first ever game means so much to me living in new york
@devinnunes1488 ай бұрын
why’s that you don’t know them
@GeoThaDude7 ай бұрын
I think the NHL could try the jailbreak in the All Star games rather than putting it into regulation play right away. Similar to what they did with 3 on 3.
@richardvladyka2497 ай бұрын
Trust me, 3,2,1,0 will make NHL worse it is closer between teams now it is more interesting and even if you go to OT you can win full points it is genius, in Europe where i am from we have 3,2,1,0 almost everywhere and it makes the league boring
@JDX427 ай бұрын
3210 should DEFINITELY be added, so much more on the line that way
@trudelrene-martin81767 ай бұрын
Really happy for the women’s league. Both rules are not serving any purpose. Don’t want those in nhl. Pk is pk because one of your players have fouled a ruled. I understand the idea to have mcdavid or Poulin play all game long but I think it’s good to have position players rewarded for their contribution. There is only a few players in a league ( male or female) that could make a difference if pk goals would change the momentum of a game. Those players are usually (already) on the ice more than their share. I don’t see the advantage. Points 3-2-1-0. Any point system has their ups and downs. The current nhl format is awsome. It really gives most teams a chance to qualify for the playoffs. 3-2-1-0 would spread teams into a wider point difference like we had in the pre 2005 era. We would have teams qualified or disqualified for the playoffs by the end of January. Than the last 30 games would be pointless
@erincooley74257 ай бұрын
I think all those rules are good. When I get older, I am probably going to try to play in the PWHL
@k-doghockeyproductions30347 ай бұрын
As a leafs fan, I do not want the second rule considering most of our wins out in ot
@MessiRonaldoandaviationfan9097 ай бұрын
I agree that winning in regulation should be worth 3 points in the standings
@simonnam4537 ай бұрын
It's easier to implement new rules when no one is watching
@slippinjimmy5277 ай бұрын
points rule makes sense, but at the end of the day, if you lose, YOU LOSE
@THATGOALIE307 ай бұрын
Penalty kill rule is good because the opposing team has an extra player they shouldn’t be giving up a goal.
@Nickyisabie6 ай бұрын
We need to add the pwhl in nhl 24 or next year in nhl 25
@JustinW907 ай бұрын
1. No skating. 2. No shooting
@henryt92817 ай бұрын
Penalty shot rule should be: 1. Anyone one the ice can take the penalty shot, not just the player who won the penalty. 2. Penalty shot taker starts at the red line. Everyone else starts at the opposite blue line. 3. As soon as the penalty shot taker touches the puck, every else can chase. 4. If the penalty shot is saved, play continues without a stoppage.
@averagejosh66998 ай бұрын
3-2-1-0 is obviously a W, the SHG rule is stupid. You’ve been penalized, pay the full price. But if they get rid of the shootout and replace it with continuous 3-on-3, you bet your ass I’m watching every game tied after 60.
@tylerjohnson8607 ай бұрын
I always thought the losing team no matter if its regulation or ot should not get a point
@KangarooJakk7 ай бұрын
The short handed goal rule should 100% be in the NHL. Been begging for that for years
@N-Zen8 ай бұрын
A finnish hockey league called Liiga uses these rules and i like them,good set of rules.
@scottchannel17828 ай бұрын
The 3210 real sounds good
@SusWolfAmongUs7 ай бұрын
I’d like it, but it would be different, kinda seems like the IIHF a little bit, points wise
@michaelgierusz57547 ай бұрын
The best point systme is Win/Loss and playoffs 1-8
@curtissmith57577 ай бұрын
** I think when there is a delayed penalty, if you score the other team still gets the penalty. I never understood why it is just gone.
@MessiRonaldoandaviationfan9097 ай бұрын
Yeah that’s definitely a fair rule change if it were to happen in the future
@robertgardner80157 ай бұрын
They seem to have another rule, you can't shoot the puck over 60mph
@princechickenwings27467 ай бұрын
I think it should be 2-1-0 but make OT 20 minutes 5-on-5 sudden death if no goals its a tie 2 for win 1 for tie 0 for loss
@Twafs7 ай бұрын
My family got us. PWHL season tickets so I can’t wait to a game soon
@chrisdranfield38287 ай бұрын
NHL is most likely never changing the points system. It would create separation between good , average. And bad teams. They like that teams stay bunched in the standings to create playoff races. They don’t care that a team with 15 OT losses gets in over a team with 7 more regulation wins.
@jonmendelson11047 ай бұрын
The difference in the standings from changing to the 3-2-1 system or a pure win-loss system is fairly negligible, with the major caveat that it's based on changing the system after the fact and doesn't factor in teams changing how they play late in games (if you're tied late now there's incentive to play prevent defense for the last few minutes, lock up the loser point, and then play for the second point once OT starts, but that would be reduced if you could no longer get the full amount of points once OT starts).
@CJTheTendy7 ай бұрын
people who like the 3,2,1,0 rule 👇
@Kingbob6427 ай бұрын
I am a boy but I have been waiting for women’s for so long and I am excited
@towerofmilitary7 ай бұрын
Watched the New York Toronto game at UBS arena
@hr1meg7 ай бұрын
Can we stop rewarding losers? A point for a loss? How about nothing for the loser.
@PJJ1967 ай бұрын
I agree that the OT win shouldn’t be valued the same as regulation.. that is the only rule change I agree with
@callumloader87137 ай бұрын
3-2-1 needs to come to the nhl asappppppp.
@brady34398 ай бұрын
The nhl should do the 3,2,1 but then all of the records would be messed up
@AcidFlash1237 ай бұрын
They already are. They changed amount of games per season, got rid of ties, 3 on 3 overtime, shootouts, etc.
@jonmendelson11047 ай бұрын
The only real benefit of the 3-2-1 system is it gives teams tied late in games incentive to try to win in regulation rather than play it safe to lock up the loser point. I've run the numbers a few times at the end of seasons and the changes in the standings were minimal, with the obvious note that it can't factor in teams changing how they'd play if I'm doing it after the fact.
@Chucker22Ай бұрын
Another one is that they put the sponsor above the number and the name bar bellw
@TheStanleycup33227 ай бұрын
No need to overthink anything just let them play hockey and fix the playoff format first.
@justins69907 ай бұрын
Love both rules
@deerdown83557 ай бұрын
The woman are also hitting on ice. Finally!!!!! ✌️🇨🇦
@banusuthan74327 ай бұрын
3-2-1-0 hockey would change the whole standing system, but it is amazing
@mattt69207 ай бұрын
Not to be rude but i do think thats the entire point of implementing it
@jonmendelson11047 ай бұрын
There are only 2 benefits I see to the 3-2-1 system. The first is that all games will be worth the same number of points (3) regardless of when they end. The second is teams that are tied late will have an incentive to finish out the game in regulation as opposed to avoiding risks to lock up the loser point. Applying the 3-2-1 system to existing seasons after the fact, not factoring in teams changing play style to close out games in regulation, the changes in the standings are actually pretty negligible.
@bangchannie_977 ай бұрын
I'm a girl youth hockey goalie and I play on an all girls team, I am so happy that women get their own league.
@ChrundleKelly7 ай бұрын
Scoring on a delayed penalty should still result in a powerplay. Also not sure I like the short handed goal rule.
@walkingcorpse27047 ай бұрын
Definitely the 3-2-1-0 and definitely NOT the shorthanded goal
@spqdallas6 ай бұрын
Also, shouldn't it be WPHL? Professional Women's Hockey League sounds like an intramural competition for ladies with an MBA.
@Bottle793687 ай бұрын
The short handed rule is stupid, rewarding a team that had a penalty just because they scored removes the whole point of pk and pp
@julialandry53437 ай бұрын
In the FPHL this rule applies to
@STRONGHEARTGAMES7 ай бұрын
Women's hockey is going to go about as well as Women's basketball
@TheOvieShow7 ай бұрын
Don’t like that penalty rule. I enjoy how PPs are right now and even when your team is PKing it’s fun. Really interested in the points system though. At least some variation in how the system works.
@BackEastBaseball7 ай бұрын
Possibly 3,2,1,0 absolutely not to any of the others the real game the way it is played is perfect how it is currently
@z400racerr9107 ай бұрын
that first girl flopped like an absolute fish the second that other player made the smallest of contact. Do they not teach defensive skating ?
@stephen79917 ай бұрын
The NHL is having viewership problems but someone thinks a women’s hockey league is gonna stick
@SRSpoony8 ай бұрын
Way behind eruropean hockey it seems. We had that points system for decades. Our Penally system in champions league has Penalty is that the power player team stay on a power regardless of how many goals scored. 2 minutes means 2 minute no early release THAT is better as it rewards the correct team for not being dirty
@devinwillis77877 ай бұрын
I think getting the players out of the box is better for the viewers. We like seeing hits and then being punished more will continue to push to less and less contact. The games from the early 2000s were way better than what we get now
@InsayneVidz7 ай бұрын
I watched all the games so far it's been really good hockey
@johnnyboy35637 ай бұрын
Another interesting concept, they actually pay you to go watch a game.
@westonwright61137 ай бұрын
I mean when I grew up if you where in the box and the other team scored they got the point and you leave the box unless it’s a major
@jonmendelson11047 ай бұрын
You're misunderstanding. That's still the same in pretty much all leagues. This rule change is that if you go to the box for a minor penalty and your team scores a shorthanded goal, you get out of the box.
@Whatdoyouwant9048 ай бұрын
I like the PK rule, and the 3, 2, 1, 0. Wouldn’t be upset to see either in NHL
@Helmut-Von-Liechtenstein8 ай бұрын
The short handed goal thing was something they took from the PHF. It was pretty neat
@marksmith1617 ай бұрын
Pretty stupid**
@hotgrease7 ай бұрын
If you score a shorthanded goal you should get your own power play.