As long as there is corruption with the authorities in different departments including in Courts, people cannot expect justice. Mostly our Judicial and Police system are criminal-friendly. The more you have money, there is more chances of justice in your favour.

Absolutely, explained in details by the Advocate of Supreme Court. It is irrelevent to say that present laws i.e. IPC, CRPC are not colonial law due to amendement it by the time and various judgement. Hence, the new laws should be explain in.details. Everybody knows that India“s pilice modus operandi.

The laws seem to have made for harrasment of common people and opponents of the rulling party and are massively impractical. The discussion is very helpful. Please provide similar interpretation for the other two laws.

Is there a chance that there would be a review of the shortcomings of the new codes? There would be anarchy and only escalation of load on the courts all over. I really feel there should be deferment of the date of implementation.

Supreme court advocate is co cute, innocent and expert . Wish him the best. Thank you sir for ur time👍

Amazing session, very insightful!

Correct me if I am wrong, but police personnel still ask for bribes before filing an FIR

Very insightful session.

Important Provisions Very Well Touched by both in easy to understand.Thanks for sharing

Do you think all the judges in the country have read new law, understood it and ready to take action? Or like GST there will be trial and error for years to come.

What an insightful interview!

Very informative session.

Awesome interview.

Excellent vlog simple lucid🎉🎉🎉

Very well explained.

Thanks for good discussion

Very useful info.. For the issues that Mr Nipun pointed out in the some of the changes new law - can he tell whether govt gave the motivation or justification behind those changes?

Excellent sir

CrPC is not colonial. As it was enacted in 1973. Almost 30 years post independence

What is the difficulty in amending “ unfair” provisions based on experiences once in 6 months till stabilisation? All misuses can not be envisaged in advance? Any policy can be questioned.

❤❤

Bhai o "nayik suraksha sanhita" ya "nagrik suraksha sanhita"? Which is right?

this was so needed

So, what is going to happen? So many protests and appeals to not to implement the new laws from July first, did anything happen?

Laws still haven't been made gender-neutral. So much for equality before law in India.

Well, the SHO has greater degree of Responsibility, and Accountability as to WHY HE HAS NOT TAKEN UP criminal investigation or FILE an FIR, as needed. He could be susoended or even, DISMISSED for misconduct

In a nutshell, Bhadrajee, the laws would come down heavily on criminality, in whichever form, or modus, while, simultaneously, seeking to fast-track criminal investigations Most importantly, THE PUNISHMENT WOULD NEED TO COMMENSURATE wilh the CRIME, and BAIL, now becomes on Case to case basis, and not a matter of RIGHT, or PRIVILEGE, especially in rural India

Most of the SHO are just 10 th pass who who became SHO is just by promotion.

Colonial rule by British has taught us english that has made indians acceptable to whole world.british have made us expert in all matters.

Dear The Print, Please see 4:50 onwards. Please tell your distinguished legal luminary that no state amendments are in limbo as they have all been repealed. Secondly, atleast I and people of my skill, experience and understanding know it very clearly that all the previous state amendments have also gone away with the repeal of the old laws to which they were all added. Since the gentleman says clearly that he doesn't know whether the state amendments would be operative or not...please tell him that that they would not be. I hope you will really bring some good, senior and experienced lawyers who have put in at least three decades or more in specialised practice rather than the phoney introduction that Mr. X is an advocate in the Supreme Court. There are some advocates in the Supreme Court who are much poorer performers than the advocates in the Civil Courts.

Just like NEP 2020 ruined the traditional form of Education this Baratiy Nyay Sanhita will ruin the rights of comman man.

Word of advice to the Bania government..Dont bite more than what you can chew..

The new 'Bharatiya' laws are not only idiotic, but also pernicious!! I've been saying this ever since these 'laws' were 'passed'...! These new laws are 70-80% copy-paste from the old laws without any substantial changes (this even many lawyers have averred!) One can logically argue that if there is so much overlap between the old & new ones, then what the heck is the need to bring in the new laws, which, by themselves, would lead to a ton - a TON! - of logistical & practical issues!?!?! As is usual with this govt., this is an absolutely idiotic, un-thought-out move; doing things just to do something!); but/and wherever the laws actually have been changed, most of the changes (not all, but most) have been made to make the laws much more stringent; giving too much power in the hands of police/DM/govts! This would, obviously, lead to even more police corruption - bribery, police brutality, etc.! Human & individual rights have been relegated to a distant second place! This is very dangerous & will lead to a police state, and more harassment of citizens; more stifling of freedom of speech/expression & more unnecessary/frivolous cases, thus, further clogging the Indian judicial system! In short, the new laws are asinine & pernicious both in concept, policy & practice! Just like Agnipath/Agniveer scheme was the most idiotic & pernicious thing to occur to the Indian military & national security, so are these laws for Indian legal system, judiciary, and individual rights & freedoms...!! Yet another classic example of BJP's ineptness of framing laws/policy...Beyond a certain point, ineptness can't be distinguished from malice...and I am beyond being charitable now, and I genuinely think this was done deliberately by BJP in order to make India a more police state...in order to retain power, and try to rule in perpetuity... And, the Judiciary has let the people down with their indifference & pusillanimity...!

Everything will be done within time limit. Unnecessary weariness you are trying to insinuate in to the minds .

When set of experts drafted it, and not just political expediency , it is premature to fault them even before the implementation of the change. Argumentive Indians can continue to argue and no time frame is enough. Blame NDA but they have guts to pull all the legislations, reforms, policy decisions. Whenever they failed like in case of agri reforms, I won't blame opposition but NDA.

This will pan out just like Demonitisation and GST

As you said...your understanding of the new Criminal laws is indeed limited😂

The Nagarik cannot become so powerful that he holds the State ransom.Most people despise Braudel and ultra Left theories.

The expert seems misinformed on a lot of grounds and having minimal experience with criminal matters as they happen. First the audio video part is so that the integrity of the arrest, search and seizure done by police is questioned less in the courts. 2. Preliminary enquiry, as a tool, will allow Police stations to ask their DSP rank officer for permission to conduct PE before they register. We have seen a lot of times FIRs are done just to harrass the other party at times victim to bring them to the compromise table. This way such "naagriks" will be provided "suraksha" by those who tend to use FIR as a tool by making up facts. This will also reduce the pendency in courts. Further, even if Police does not register FIR the victim if wronged by Police can approach the SP or the court who then shall ask the preliminary enquiry report for their decision.To conclude, while the expert points out a few good points but most of his viewpoints I feel are very pro litigation and not pro justice.

A new Simon Commission

The use of the word "decolonization" defending the new laws, is indeed, a misnomer, Bhadrajee. Besided, laws need to attuned and reformed to changing times in the Indian jurisprudencial system. I just wish to ask your good self, Bhadrajee, what detriment could pissible occur to a honest, LAW-ABIDING indian citizen with the enforcement of these reforms?

This lady repeatedly said Bhartiya Nyay Suraksha Sanhita instead of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sahinta

I think Bhadra is very Hot... I follow her on ig and she dances very well too... Huge crush

Try your best, congress and your foreign fundraising agencies. Nothing will happen. This time also they will bite the dust just like the people who voted for the congress to get their khatakhat guarantee. Congress declared emergency in India after suspending the constitution and now they themselves cry for the same. They will never learn a lesson

Goods and bads is not in consonance with standard English!

BAIL IS NOW A DISCRETION,, NOT A RIGHT, OR PRIVILEGE

Name of pretty and smart anchor please.😂

There is coordinated attempt to create a negative narrative by the echo system.

Jis desh me musalmaano ke liye alag education aur kanoon ho vaha ethics kahaa sein develop hoge.

Get ready for ci.....l wa..

Aadha adhura jankari hai

I don’t agree with you on that Handcuffs rambling. Everyone arrested should be handcuffed and that is the end of it. Focus should be on the free and fair trials if wrongly accused person come out as winner than handcuffs are not a big deal. His reputation has recovered. Our focus should be on giving police better equipment and training on how to behave with public. Give them cars and proper training and decent uniform, remove all those ranks Sipahi etc. give them body cams and when they arrest body cam should be on if not that person should held accountable strictly. Then after we have teams of forensic and educated and trained police then you can implement these new laws with modification other than hand cuffs. Because it is important that we pay attention to police security too. So handcuffs are not big deal

Naam acts ka toh sahi likh do jab video bana rahe ho 😂

Modi the true dictator

Kitna paise diye George soros ne is talk show agenda ke liye.

Bhadrajee, the handcuff argument is highly CIRCUMSTANTIAL, and 4 FIRs filed simultaneously, is FIRST offence, but if they are successive in chronological order, they are treated as REPEAT offences, not reoeat offenders. Look, you cannot have LAWS CARVED IN STONE, a lot depends on the circumstances, criminal records, if sny, of defenders and the PERPECTIVES taken by local enforcement agencies

So when are you doing an extensive analysis of the old IPC and how oppressive and repressive it was? You literally start with 'concern' not open minded.. that itself colours your ability to assess anything objectively

Both look criminals