ram dass had the biggest ego, his followers are upper middle class white people whio cry cops are bad but they dfend cop unions

Sounds similar to the 'Indra's net' metaphor. An infinite 3d array of jewels illuminated by a single, infinite light. Each jewel contains within it the reflection of all other jewels, as well as that reflection infinitely. If the light is to be taken as "awareness," it can be inferred how singularity could perceive itself as infinite separate identities.

Or don’t imagine it… who cares. It’s all the same.

I believe your feelings are correct Andreia. The amnesia is caused by the segmentation of our consciousness from the whole. When the ego-construct is finally conquered. The walls of segmentation will break down. Allowing us to experience the full unsegmented consciousness (aka awakening). We will still experience the I AM, but as an eye of the one, that has immeasurable eyes.

You have to be an angst teen

Thank you Ted! Your show of appreciation is super nice :)

Why do you think free will exists?

I also recommend checking out Living Waters KZfaq channel and watching any of their videos all the way through. Hope this helps you find clarity and comfort :)

The „I“-dentification, you simply become awareness accepting the very moment

Starving the soul doesn’t work, if we silence the Throne of our Ego (head) there is only the seat of soul left - our hearts

@@houseoffirebellytoads1439 Thank you.

Several ways to approach thinking about it (optional content, Advaita Vedanta adjacent): Beyond body and mind, time and space. Nondual philosophies come from the perspective of an observer who identifies as undifferentiated awareness. The goal is to dissolve questions, not to answer them. Removing obstacles obscuring what's already there, as opposed to carrying more thought objects. It is "try it and see directly," not "listen and understand." Language experiences contradiction when it tries to contain what created it. The language is to be used as a pointer in a certain direction, and not as destination. The body is like a vehicle, the mind is like an eye, and spacetime is like a measurement tool. Consider- someone looking everywhere for their glasses, only to find that they were actually wearing them the whole time. Were they ever lost, despite the idea that they were? Or a rope in tall grass that is taken as a snake from a distance. Was there ever a snake? This is how separation can be considered. The identity goes here and there saying, "I am separate,"- consider the possibility that this separation can be dispelled in the same way as the "lost glasses" or "snake in the grass." There is no need to explain separation if its resolution is directly experienced. Direct experience- "I had an experience I can call pain." Indirect experience- "I observed an other seem to be in the experience of pain." Nondual thought relies on direct experience only- it is inward facing. You cannot know the experience of another- even the contemplation of it dissolves without "you." If I hallucinate, I can eventually see that the experience was not "real," however, the "experiencing of the hallucination" was real. There is the concept of maya, or illusion. Experience in space & time is taken as real in error, when in reality the experiencing itself is the only truth. The window into this is focusing on who one considers to be the one experiencing. Who am I? Who is the one experiencing? The separation between "you" and "me" - where is it during deep, dreamless sleep? Who is there to proclaim, "I am separate."? Can I say that "I" disappeared between sleep? Is there a break in the continuity of my identity? Or can the one writing and/or reading this now consider that they contain both the 'waking-body-mind' and 'sleeping-blank' identities. I cannot say I am the body if I observe gaps in experiencing the body. Trace back your direct experience to before birth. There was a blank, and then gradually details. How much time passed before your birth? What was there, in your own experience? Think of experience as an image on a canvas or screen. All sorts of images come and go, but the screen remains the same and unaffected. Imagine the screen as a singularity that contains all possible experiences. The observer can become invested in the drama, and take themselves as its creations, only to remember at some point- "that is not me." Many have no trouble seeing the human body as "one" continuous object performing actions, when it is really a complex combination of separate systems. The goal is to think of the entirety of one's experience like a body- one connected thing that just happens to have distinguishable parts. This involves expanding one's identity, for example, to include the furthest reaches of universe and imagination conceivable, and all that exists within it. Indra's Net (search term). Metaphor- imagine an infinite 3d array of jewels, being illuminated by a single, infinite light. Each jewel contains (in some way) the reflection of all other jewels in the array. They have a separate location in space, and are each observed at a separate moment in time, but there is ultimately no separation. This can illustrate how different human experiences can be understood as non-separate despite different time and space values. Nondual, relative codependence. As soon as I think, "this is me," a whole reality of "this is not me," is created. Duality is a prerequisite for experience within time and space. "I am at this place, not that one." "I am at this time, not that one." However, consider who is able to think about this. The one able to conceptualize the dualities is outside of them, or similarly, the dualities are contained within. Within this frame, a duality can reduce to one. The observer (subject) and the observed (object) dissolve into the observing ("I am" principle, awareness). "All objects in the set" describes the same objects as "no objects in the set." "Hot" or "cold" can only exist due to their central anchor. All dualities can collapse to a similar center, and that center can be investigated as the identity that experiences. All of this said, nondual thought along the lines of self-inquiry is not the only path towards these types of realizations, nor is it advisable or necessary for the general population. It is not for special people either. It is for people who find an interest in it- they will observe themselves follow the path without any effort.

@@ThatRand0mGuy Thanks for the thought-through answer (good metaphore with the snake) but I still do not understand something. I understand that division myself-world can be an illusion. But I don't uderstand how my experience (everything that can be percieved by my conciousness) can "already be everything", since I believe other people have different experience. Unless we are talking about some transcendental state. "I am at this place, not that one." "I am at this time, not that one." - well, in everyday life I experience being in certain places, not in others. Even if we take the feeling of being "somebody" or "me" out of the equation, my body still limits what can be percieved

This woman rambles incoherently and is probably depressed. We exist and so does the universe, and we can progress and find meaning in life. Life and death are both real and they are polar opposites, not one and the same. Everything she says is confused nonsense.

Be nice dude. It doesn't cost a thing and makes people feel good.

Juicy question, and I think actually a worthwhile one to explore. By the same token, why comment at all? Why anything at all? Why do? Better to let yourself be undone. Stop naming And doing things Walk through, and see who walks through you. You are First Light

I don’t think these words bother her, since she knows that they come from a place of identity desperately grasping for solid ground on concepts, which ultimately don’t exist, and for attainment which is not real. Anyways, peace and love.

@@kieranofblackwood7951 If you died and you were there to know it, would you really be "dead"? If you died and weren't there to know it, would you really be "dead"? If there is an experience of death, you aren't dead; if there is no experience of death, you aren't dead (because there is no you.) So indeed, death does not exist. There is only life. Are the atos in your body alive or dead? Are they dead when they are in stars or minerals or gasses or liquids, but alive when they are in proteins and enzymes and fats? Life and death are both concepts, neither can't contain reality.

Try starting with The Heart Sutra & then go from there. 🙏🏼💛

Interesting perspective