I have so much appreciation for Jordan Peterson and his willingness to step into the breach. Humanity needs this man, and I am forever grateful for his ability to persevere in the face of constant, ridiculous attacks.

It's admirable how Dr. J. Peterson constantly fights for human improvement in detriment of his health and personal life. All my gratitude for this effort and hope some day people will really listen to what he has to say and follow his advice. Admirable indeed 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻✨️🤗

Incredible how he just sits through two minutes of baseless slander and then dismantles it without getting emotionally riled up because he's heard the same tune a million times before. Lol

Jordan is a brilliant and beautiful human. The world is a better place because of his contributions to humanity. He is loved, admired and respected by millions. He is the main reason I’m on KZfaq. Thank you, Jordan. ✝️❤️

This man and his character , upright and just as it is, has been a model for me long before I even saw him.. It is his character and the very existence of it that is great in this automaton plague.

The Beatles answered this question: “But when you talk about destruction…” people who advocate for just smashing things rather than building structures to nurture those left at the bottom.

Nothing but respect and admiration for this man. I enjoy the way that Dr. Peterson engages in thoughtful, and meaningful conversation. He doesn't get mad, he doesn't lose control. He chooses his words carefully, and says what he means. Legend.

He will bring us together.

Sadly we live in a world where we are raising generations of truth-deniers. Young people have been so babied in to realms of denial of truth, so much so that they are infuriated when responsibility is placed upon them.

The "radical left" and "radical right" are holding hands.

Peterson is not a divisive person, in the slightest. I can’t understand the thought process of the people that wrote that shite about it.

Very helpful advice, distancing yourself from radicals is crucial. You should probably fight harder against extremists and radicals on your side, than against the ones on the opposing side.

When one only sees their own narrow view all they see is their own perspective. There is something worth listening here despite my critiques of him on defining who is reasonable (note, question that within myself a lot).

Wow. Those letters at the beginning show how these students predicate their arguments off of pure fallacy. Are they that lacking in the history of our country and culture? Where are they coming from and what is their basis for these beliefs? That is a sincere question. Is it any wonder that we are so divided?

Is it the natural PERSON talking, or is it the IDEOLOGY? That is deep, seriously deep. Thank you.

There's a Lot of Difference between the Far Left today and what I used to consider Left/Liberal. Peterson is NOT any of the things this anonymous Marxist student claims.

“DO BETTER!” 😂

A hallmark of liberal thinking is that humans are perfectible. Thomas Sowell calls this the “unconstrained vision.” I call it the quest for liberation (in a literal sense; liberated from all forms of opposition, internal and external). Thus, perhaps the reason that the Left cannot identify their boundary (a “constrained vision”) is that they see themselves as on a path toward perfection. More is always better, closer to perfection. “Too far” would mean that their ultimate goal is incorrect and their “vision” is wrong.

One of the most cited physiologists in the history of man. A man with an astounding career. He’s devoted his life to knowledge and the inner workings of the human mind. And people don’t even want to hear what he has to say? Because sometimes he hurts your feelings? Preposterous. You should be uncomfortable at all times. You should listen to the words you recoil from. Only a trained communist would act hurt or damaged because someone disagrees with you.

9:14 Watch the man on the right, Brandon Van Dyck (it took me 10 minutes to find his name), do something we've probably all experienced from listening to Dr. Peterson when he says something we've never heard before and we immediately know it's exactly right. When Dr. Peterson explains a technical reason the left have trouble drawing boundaries, Brandon turns away, looks up, and his face basically goes, "Not bad." He the lowers his head and begins nodding along to the points Dr. Peterson is making. Before that he was in the same position looking right at Dr. Peterson for at least 3 minutes, maybe longer. I've lost count of how many mini-epiphany moments I've had while listening to Dr. Peterson.

So many people love and respect this man for good reason he has absolutely earned it and then some!

Such a brilliant man 💚

One of the biggest lies in contemporary political discussion is the notion that national socialism and fascism were right-wing. National socialism and fascism were collectivist and revolutionary, and those are left-wing characteristics. Mussolini used to be a revolutionary socialist until during ww1 he decided that somebodies nationality was more important than somebodies class membership. Hitler replaced class warfare with race warfare: different collective, same collectivist ideology. Fascism, communism, and national socialism are closer to each other than to real right-wing movements. The only difference is that they specify their central collective differently: proletariat class for communists, nation for fascists, and race for national socialists. The only reason that fascism and national socialism are called right-wing nowadays is that the communists labeled them as such, to smear their competition in the struggle for which ideology is the true collectivist ideology.

If you need to dislike this great man,ok. But, he's not hurting anyone,just getting you thinking. If he offends you,or,hurts your feelings,tough shit☘️🖕🥂🖤

I will never understand how truth and critical thinking is considered "hate" just because it hurts your feelings.

There is a huge difference between equality of opportunity and equality of outcome. I support equality of opportunity and believe there is a lot of work that could be done. I also consider myself a moderate leaning towards liberal. Equal outcome is a society deadend for many reasons built into human behavior that are not going to change anytime soon.

Unfortunatly that line, like established on the right, won’t come into view until an awful tragedy that mirrors WW2.

JP often raises the question, 'Where do we draw the line?' From what I gather, he aims to establish that line as "equity." However, I find myself wanting to create a mirror of the right's racial superiority by considering class superiority the left's line, instead. Nowadays, the radical left often praises the lower class without question and even advocates for the demise of the upper classes, both as individuals and as a collective.

I consider myself a man of the far right. In some instances, yes, the far right and the far left have similar, if not identical, ideas and goals, but the key difference comes down to intent and motivation.

"Do better" is one of the more condescending, obnoxious things that people like to say nowadays. Up there with "triggered". People suck sometimes.

1:00 I like how the letter lists all these "insidious" things Jordan believes, and I'm like, 'Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. And?' Though, it's actually refreshing they managed to be so close to accurate.

narrowly defined community good before the individual suffering experienced by the majority of the group = extreme right? undefined rights of the symbolic individual before the individual suffering experienced by the majority of the group = extreme left?

I will criticise the thumbnail pic. There's no gap between the left and right. The solid is the middle. There's a chasm at either end. Life taught me that.

Wow, that students introduction gave JBP a lot of… does that mean the list, is what they want JBP to actually support. Sounds like another misinformed child with a long way still to go in life. It is very kind of JBP to continually answer the same questions. No matter how repetitively insane they are.

There is very little harmony between Freedom,,,, and Force. The space between them is the degree to which force should be applied,, and to whom.

Define both. Because its not clear that woke folks and Bernie sanders supporters are the same crowd (they do overlap but they are distinct). Also its not clear what he means by the far right, most folks would consider someone who wants to return to 2nd term Obama's budget as far right, despite the fact that is probably a very reasonable proposition for the long term stability of our currency and government.

Information doesn't travel in all directions at the same speed, speaking of different perceptions.

This might very well be your Best explanation of political importance as a definition from far right to far left.

I don't think it's nearly as complicated as you say. Force. If your idea has merit, it won't require force to get people to agree. It's really that simple. People can disagree about a great many things, and still have a functioning society. But when one side begins to believe that they're so right that they can compel others to agree with them, the topic no longer matters. You're wrong.

Let's just say the radical right has a smaller record of violence.

Listening to someone assume shyte about u and never had a Convo or critical analysis of ur behavior, is the chat buzz of ideologues possessed by demons. Touché Mr. P. TOUCHÉ

What on earth is wrong with students uttering such absolute disdain for free open debate - and in a university of all places, I mean this is completely mental!

2:34, 6:19

Please show me a moderate, elected Democrat in America right now. Just 1.

"Where do you cross the line on the left"? It's easy. It's when you claim that people are a product of environment ONLY and by controlling the environment, you can shape people without any limit. Infinite malleability.

This is pretty good

You can disagree with Peterson, but calling him stupid is just obviously wrong.

What exactly does a radical right believe in? Freedom? Less government? Leave children alone? Stop wars? Close the boarder? Freedom to protect yourself and home? Freedom to practice religion?

but we cannot allow it to go on.. help us please.. it is terrifying

Bigger the space, bigger the party!)

7:30 someone put the NPC on the right of the interview on pause

What doesn't quite come across with the student criticism s is that they must have been written using a voice-to-text application. It's far too difficult to type while lying down while spastically flailing around, stomping your feet and pounding your fists on the floor. I know. I've tried. Also, the original text, before translation wad, " WAAAAA!, WAAAA!, MOMMY, THE MAN IS BEING MEAN TO ME!"

If you are going to slander someone who is doing you the privilege of bringing some reasonability to your campus, you should at least do your homework and realize he could disassemble your ill-formed argument easily and tactfully so you don't waste his time. DO BETTER

"Diversity, who's against that" Me, it's antiwhite.

love it.

what a sad soul making such judgements on a man like Jordan Peterson same happened to Jesus they hated him bc he was right and juste.❤☦ God bless,

the "university" is only a place to plunge neck deep in dept for very long time, no other result come out of college that worth it, the knowledge and skills after 4 years of higher education could be acquired way easier and cheaper through self learning via text books and reading a lot and good self discipline, many programs are like this (some are not like medicine). in future less and less people will/can afford to go to college

Perhaps …… When the humanity of people (psychological integrity) is disregarded in pursuit of ideological equity = lost their way - I am not sure racial discrimination is a clear enough marker - I think it is more to do with the percentage of the population that can pursue their individuality - there is a critical mass where right politics collapses in on its self. Same goes for left - in essence it is the same thing - percentage of people that can experience their essential humanity in all its colour

I just want to talk to people without them cowering behind "dog whistle!" just because you didn't say what they believe you think.

Also "Lots of Space" between the ears of the most vocal proponents of both groups. Ergo: fix your own shit.... Rule number: something or other.

I don't agree with all of your ideas, especially after your more recent turn towards Daily wire, it looks like some of the previous strong logic and reasoning behind the ideas is lost. BUT I think you are very reasonable person as a whole and everything in this video is absolutely spot on.

Nazi's are Leftists, not "on the Right," as Dr Peterson purports. Yes Nazi's are ever so slightly right of Communists, but both are on the far-Left compared to any other governing system. That Dr Peterson doesn't know that after all these years on the political stage makes one wonder about his cognitive ability to learn?

Could someone elaborate for me what is a boundary-dissolving type? I'm not familiar with the term.

likely, valid markers are ideologies that go against nature, especially human nature... just like racial superiority is not a fact of nature... so for the left it could indeed be an ideology that attempts to establish equality of outcomes... but to equate that with a will for equity is not a valid representation in my view... a will for equity in its meaning of « justice, fairness, and impartiality » certainly does not imply the will for equality of outcomes... rather, it seems that the aim there is merely to take the artificial challenges, for instance those which are maintained through traditions of prejudice, out of the way of the individual, so that the necessary challenges that the collectivity is facing can be addressed more efficiently... a will for equity in its meaning of « equality » does not necessarily imply the will to level hierarchies of competence, and enforce equality outcomes... for instance, equality of opportunity can actually help some people, who have skill and disposition for excellence but who find themselves in unfavorable circumstances, to actually emerge and reach the level of excellence they have the ability to reach, and would otherwise possibly never reach... how many women are discouraged of choosing careers in fields traditionally dominated by men precisely because the likelihood of being remunerated adequately and treated fairly is low ? surely some of those women are intelligent, conscientious, and competent, and would have their place among the bests... in a similar manner, equality of starting points, rebalancing the general circumstances individuals are « born into, » is not about trying to uniformize outcomes, but is rather about encouraging the healthy development of communities through improving the chances that all individuals actually reach the levels of excellence they have the ability to reach...

What is a parasite thinker?

In the middle of that space is God ...of your servitude to the one owns both the law supporting it, and the apparatus, money. Money owns everyone it's designed to. Information is their miracle spell on us, it's also the key to our exit from the money matrix. Lot of people looking at time and skills banks of ourselves , without the USURPED by bankers pyramidal power structures. Our time and skills equally valued is our banks. The goods and services based on the time it takes us to produce them is the time valued benefits, so we all work equally benefited regardless the position, no boss and employee, just a collective of workers working for each other.

Replace money used to control for time used to produce. Think outside the enslavement apparatus system.

But that doesn't matter at all, Pescador de Hombres. They STILL have the COMMON DENOMINATOR: RADICAL. It makes NO DIFFERENCE.

Much as I appreciate Peterson, I have come to the conclusion that the dichotomy between Right and Left is false at the extremes.. When you discard the cosmetic differences - the slogans and symbols - there is almost no difference between the Nazis and the Communists. The implication is that either WW2 was primarily caused by the Left, or we have no adequate definition of “Right”, so what are we talking about? A False Dichotomy is a logical fallacy. The similarities are obvious. Both are run by oligarchies, usually called “parties”. Both justify their oligarchy by promoting conflict between identity-groups. (The evidence that there is some kind of fundamental difference between grouping people by race and doing so by class, religion, sex or “gender” is weak) Both demand complete control by the State Oligarchy of Production, Distribution and Exchange ( the titular names of the “owners” are irrelevant, because the owners will do what they are bloody well told). Both maintain their control by fear and military/police power. Keep in mind that Socialism has an obvious history of racism. Stalin had obvious racist and nationalist policies. The Chinese Communists are currently engaged in race-based discrimination against the Uighers, and what is the BLM movement other than racist?

Jordan: **is one of the most cited clinical psychologists in Western history** Muppet, citing "reasons" why Jordan is bad: "u only like him because degree."

Yes, and all that space in between is useless. You either stand for something or you fall for everything, there is no middle road that leads to success for a society as a whole. History shows that very clearly.

When Mr. Peterson starts talking politics, I shut him off. When he speaks on issues within his professional per view, I cherish every word.

7:05

Everything would be ok with J.P. view point except when he says that need to "box radicals" he risk's put them into social shadow, and when things goes into a shadow , well, professor of psychology knows himself what could happened.

You're wrong on one count, Doctor Peterson: The German National Socialist Party was not far right. They were socialists.

Sorry, Mr. Peterson, you are now working for the Daily Wire. That is the radical right. Please don't lecture the rest of us.

Not really. Left stands for governmental control and right for self control. Everything else are mainstream definitions.

Lafayette college What a joke 🤣😅

I kinda get politics in a way, life can be so crushingly pointless, it's no surprise people latch on to these teams and fight for the cause.

I haven’t become “right wing,” but I just can’t get with the straw man arguing and ideological rigidity coming from “the left.” Even a discussion should be banned cuz they don’t agree with 100% of everything that someone says.

…

First I’d like to say that there are no college liberals so who exactly is Jordan offending?

He's WRONG, MONEY IS INEQUALITY, and it's an inanimate object so it doesn't give a "seriously not good" shit.

I never see the left in the comments of his videos trying to argue their side. If these people actually listened to his videos I imagine it might wake some up. They would rather just go on short clips taken out of context and what their peers say. Really shows their lack of intelligence.

All the lines too far have been 'normalized'

It's hard to believe these wokist comments are still coming in. One really needs to know when to quit.

I'm having this issue with our state Medical Transportation, MOTIVECARE...DENYING ME RIDES,LYING,AS WELL.AS CAMC.CANCER.CENTER IN OUR STATE CAPITOL,CHARLESTON, WV.LAWSUIT

But the argument could be said that the radical right makes the exact same predisposition that the radical left does, which is what he is claiming. I am not for the radical right nor left and feel indifferent towards Peterson. I agree and disagree with his arguments. He is however clearly subjective, and I am shocked that the comments are so supportive of his argument. I agree that the gap is the problem, but his argument is flawed. The more you pay attention to Peterson, the more you can dissect his subjective arguments that are arbitrarily bias. I can clearly see how he targets his audience and the same could be said for the left.

this moderator is not competent. his choice of material is poor at best.

Pygmies are not at least as good as the rest of the world. Some races are better or worse than others.

The writer is an embarrassment

If conservatives can label activity as abusive and kidnap the children of people who don't force conformity, then leftists can too. Leave the children alone includes everyone or noone.

If you believe a trans person isn’t trans but is the sex they transitioned to then you’re as mad as someone who believes that an almighty god demands you don’t work on the sabbath. But if you don’t respect the people who want to rest on the sabbath or the people who want to live their lives as the opposite sex they are then you’re just as bad.

There is no radical or far right wing of the conservative movement. The far right comes from another part of the world, in America the far right is what we call the far left. I like Jordan, but on this he is lying and he knows he is, I lost some respect for him on this topic.

poor mr. p. sure does avoid the issue. issues. with word salad.

Jordan boasts of being a Conservative Christian, who of course badmouths all things Liberal. I am a Canadian, and no matter which party is in office, I am always thankful to live in Canada. I suggest you follow the money. In 2022, Peterson signed a content distribution deal with conservative media company, The Daily Wire. The Daily Wire is an American conservative news website and media company founded in 2015 by political commentator Ben Shapiro and film director Jeremy Boreing. It is a leading publisher on Facebook, and produces podcasts such as The Ben Shapiro Show.