Will you ever record an audiobook version of your book, thinking basketball?

@@collinwimbish4516 i

The game the warriors just had against Toronto is the definition of Curry destroying an opponent without touching the ball or putting stats up.

😮

Hahahaha, you nailed It, I almost fell off the chair.

I would have appreciated a warning honestly.

Brilliant.

Thanks for sharing that - made my day.

Loved that bit as well, we want it back please.

Playing with something similar. We'll see!

@@ThinkingBasketball Better have some nails with that hammer man, don't tease me

Five thoughts seemed like a nice way to post consistently with less time consumption/effort. If it doesn't come back, I hope he creates something else that is relatively easy to produce and doesn't detract from his more in-depth videos to increase the upload frequency.

@@pedromdcc13 lmao. Late but dope comment. Great to underrated stellar content get appreciated.

Same for Rondo with the Celtics, KD without Harden and Kyrie against the BUCKS, PG without Kawhi (you can see it right now his stats are Top 3 in the league ATM), Westbrook without KD averaging a 31ppg Triple-Double or Harden without KD and Westbrook averaging 36ppg and 7.5ast or 29ppg and 11 ast … These guys are all way better than Bosh.

He was also hitting his stride as the main option in Miami after Lebron left. Sucks that he had to retire

​@@Anthonydu01630A lot of them couldn't be as effective when they shared the court with another star. Harden with those stars couldn't adjust his game like Bosh could. Harden probably still contributed more since he's simply a much better player, but the reduction in impact is probably much larger than Bosh's

​@@Time_Lapse_Master.Generally agree but harden is such a horrible example. His game scaled down perfectly with the Nets, allowing him to run the offense, setting up kd kyrie and most importantly the roleplayers. Better example is rondo or westbrook who absolutely destroy spacing

@@jojoprocess2820 Defense.

This channel is the truth, very in depth and comprehensive.

Gonna reach basketball enlightenment

So you need to poison yourself to enjoy video huh🤔 I hear ya🤷🏾‍♂️🤣🤣😉

@@symonwatson6972 sounds like you need to *chill out*

I couldn’t have said it better 😂😂😂

As someone who grew up in the Bay (was 10 years old for Steph’s rookie year), I can tell you it was indeed a fascinating time.

It probably doesn't need 30 years from now. My guess is somewhere around 10 after Steph retires

Chill StephSexual!

@@hoanghale2671 I mean they just released the last dance and it’s been like 20 years since Jordan retired. Either way, it sucks the warriors denied complete access for a future documentary, well probably only get a fraction of the behind the scenes footage we would have if they allowed everything to be filmed. That sucks

I was thinking you could start with how often he's double teamed or how many defenders he pulls with his off ball movement. You could even give an assist to some of those baskets if it's a defender Steph occupied.

Maybe in the future, but I feel like that's a ways away.

@@ThinkingBasketball I have problem with points per 100 through different eras. In 2021, there are 27 players averaging 30pts per 100 but in 1974 there’s only 3 which is unfair for the previous generation. My suggestion would be using p values (you could use RStudio) and then analyze and use numerical summaries and give it a confidence interval of 99% to see the more anomaly season ps in history. For example, Mcgrady only registered 42 pts per 100 which is lower than guys like Embiid in 2021 and I think it’s unfair for TMac because 42pts per 100 is an anomaly back then as opposed to today. However, if you use p-values, Tmac has a case of being a top 3 scorer in his peak. The best way is probably use 10000 x (Points per 100 of a player)/ (point per 100 of a team league average)(field goal attempts league average). So a guy like Kobe in 2006 would be (10000)(45.6)/(108.4)(80.6) = 52.19 Adjusted scoring rate. For Tmac in 2003, that would be (10000)(42.0)/(105.2)(82.5) = 48.39 Adjusted scoring rate For James Harden in 2019: (10000)(48.2)/(115.3)(87.4) = 47.83 Adjusted scoring rate This is much better than points per 75 or 100 to make it fair for the pre-2010s era.

@@ThinkingBasketball if this isn't too far outside the scope of a KZfaq comment, what's insufficient about current offensive statistics, e.g RAPTOR or adjusted +/-, wrt evaluating off-ball contributions?

@@kingdinodragonite3470 2021 is an outlier IMO i dont think we'll see PPG and ORTG values like that for a while again

Mann was on the Thinking Basketball Podcast earlier this year following the draft.

@@babyeric link?

They have collaborated in the podcast a couple of times

They collaborate on the Thinking Basketball Podcast quite often

It wasnt just 1 but their 2nd Center also didnt play I believe due to getting into foul trouble. Wilt played his game against a Center ho didnt play all season long and his team force fed him the ball.

@@samraizshoaib585 Their backup center DID play - at least part of the game. And yes, Wilt was hot enough that his team force-fed him the ball - to some degree all season but especially in that game. #3 that season in FG% for the entire league, nobody hit it better on his team (and the 2 folks in the league that did were fractions of a percent better).

oh im so sorry to hear. Of what crime? ;p

He's alluded to making a second series if Greatest Peaks was successful - and I feel like it was. So if he does make it, I think that's where we'll see players that he appreciates but hasn't covered - I would expect to see Miller, Dirk, Nash, etc there.

It will happen at some point.

this show how good Curry actually is

@@hoangvyle2293 imagine if they ever played together

@@Natax99Final Lol

@@Natax99Final Imagine how competition and parity breaking that would be.

I think he's said that Charles Barkley was one of the last cuts of the peaks series

@@PIEMAN106 oh so Barkley didn't make the peak series?

@@charlesking678 nope sadly he didnt

But Shaq acknowledges Chuck's skills and game. He has even said multiple times that Chuck is one of the best players he has ever seen. Having no rings doesn't make Chuck a bad player in Shaq's eyes.

@@daanishgupta lol they’re friends it’s all joking they both both each were all time greats

I can't wait for his and J Kyle Mann's rookie coverage later on in the season

how is it inflated if he's the one doing the work?? df you mean inflated stats

Yep, same thing goes for every other high USG player. There’s a reason they have that role, whether it’s due to politics or the players ability to generate said stats consistently.

@@Industrious420 what he means by inflated is that Luka has a higher usage rate and load than other players, meaning he has more chances to rake up stats. It’s no knock on Luka, he’s without a doubt a superstar but he does have a big offensive load.

@@mtaylor1237 right? like it's his fault he has nobody else to rely on hahaha. Does that take away from his greatness at all or imply he's overhyped? I think you'd see his play style excel alongside other stars

@@Industrious420 he’d excel next to other off ball dominant superstars like AD or Klay Thompson for sure. It’s still yet to be figured out how much value Luka brings without the ball in his hands tho.

Rice 🤣🤣🤣

Rice?

Yes russel rice break, never heard of he ham

@@randomperson2540 ohhh ok

KD will be KD with or without steph, being with steph doesn't elevate KD's skills but it does make things a lot easier

They way I've looked at it is that KD is the better individual talent but Curry is the better team player. Meaning that Curry's playstyle and skillset has an easier time synergizing with his teammates' skillsets, while KD is more of a solo-carry style and skillset.

I feel like he could make a video, but I feel like it doesn’t really fit the topics he likes to cover, about basketball history and statistical analysis

Confusion/panic

Obviously, many many more examples throughout history. But the conversation really heated up about the “ease of putting up numbers” in regards to the warriors greatness.

why have you cursed me with this knowledge

Jokic is crazy, he’s somehow better than last year.

He posts more during the NBA season. Makes sense.

@@robertlowe6367 i ain’t complaining. this is heaven for me. i’m just praying the 5 thoughts series returns🙏🤞

GSW system is centered around Curry so obviously if everyone plays off of Curry without Curry they look bad. In Brooklyn they run a heavy iso offense which KD thrives in very well; pretty much all of their stars are iso heavy so it wouldnt affect him as much in that system.

Lol kd wishing he had Steph now

Steph, Lebron and Jordan are all next level in terms of offensive dominance. Most high level combos of scoring and passing in NBA history.

@@geordiejones5618 jordan really?

@@dt-lg2oc Jordan has a strong argument as the best offensive player ever

@@kingjaydex7464 I get it but he is a bit to ball dominant

@@dt-lg2oc Jordan is less ball dominant than LeBron

U see he ain’t show he’s nets stats curry Stans 😂

Don’t forget how much KD was carrying Steph in some of those playoff series lol

I think it's less so playing with them and more just having to fit the system. If you look to last year's playoffs, KD is still shooting the 3 (and from the field in general) really well. KD did come out of Golden State a better player tho, grateful he went there and got better defensively as well.

Lebron improves role players who would only be shooting without him anyways. Steph curry is the greatest at elevating star players ever and that is something lebron would never be able to do unless completely remodelling his game. His inability to do so was the reason they lost in 11

@@atlasterigo4828 in combination with D Wade’s lack on doing so and bad spacing, but I agree with the point non the less

Lebron is equipped to bring high schoolers through the regular season and to the Finals.

@@dusk6159 No he isn’t. Hopefully you were being sarcastic.

@@cycleoflife565 Watch NBA basketball and its past seasons with James in Cleveland.

2017 since his defense was better but it’s pretty close either way. There is no clear peak for KD. Also, Kd was carrying Steph big time in a lot of those playoff series if we’re being honest

Durant 2022

It is stupid. You're kobe fan and don't realise the number of shots he takes. Also having your rating higher than 35 means it's unhealthy.

@@user-bm9cv9vn2k im talking about volume tho. RTS% is already there for efficiency. That's why even if Kobe might be the highest volume scorer ever, I still think 1988 Jordan is the best scorer ever simply because of his insane efficiency and having a top 5 volume. A guy like Garnett was the most prolific scorer in 2004 with only 1960 points and only averaging 33 pts per 100. Today, that wouldn't even make it in the top 15. It's unfair for guys like him to simply say he is a worse scorer than a guy like Miles Bridges because Bridges is playing in an offensive-friendly era. Points per 100 possessions is not entirely related to volume because it has a hidden variable already which is efficiency (its name is literally points per possession) and the fact that you have already rTs% for the efficiency metric makes it inconsistent for different eras.

@@user-bm9cv9vn2k Note: This is just pure volume. So a guy like Kobe in 2006 would be (10000)(45.6)/(108.4)(80.6) = 52.19 Adjusted scoring rate. For Tmac in 2003, that would be (10000)(42.0)/(105.2)(82.5) = 48.39 Adjusted scoring rate For James Harden in 2019: (10000)(48.2)/(115.3)(87.4) = 47.83 Adjusted scoring rate This is much better than points per 75 or 100.

@@user-bm9cv9vn2k For simplicity sake: Eras A and B each have a pace of 100 possessions. Era A however, only scores 80pts per game. Era B scores around 120pts per game. The leading scorer in Era A (let's say his name is Player A) averages 30 pts. The leading scorer in Era B (Player B) averages 38 pts. Since both eras play with the same pace (100 possessions): Player A averages 30pts per 100 Player B averages 38pts per 100 So according to Thinking Basketball, Player has higher VOLUME because of higher pts per 100. For me, the answer is no. That's why we have to keep it fair and divide the era's points per 100 so Player A = 30/80 x 100 = 37.5 and Player B = 38/120 x 100 = 31.7.

I do use a linear adjustment for volume as well -- see my video on "Adjusting for Inflation"

Kobe and Shaq already played together lol

Yes! Someone knew it!

@@ThinkingBasketball love that movie!! never give up, never surrender