I want to know how long it would take a bullet to travel 1mm at that slow rate.

@@joefox9765 for a bullet with the velocity of 700 meters per second, it would reach 1mm after 1428500 picoseconds

@@vcv5021 , thank you kindly. So I guess I have to take that number and take that other number and / that number??? And then I get the years! Would you do me one more favor and tell me how many years it would take in comparison to light?

@@joefox9765 Dividing it by their roughly-10 femtoseconds per second playback speed it only seems to amount to ~40 hours per millimeter.

@@hk0O7 now I'm more confused 🤯 I just want to know how long a bullet would take

The slower the better

I just noticed XD

@@soodless4159 underrated

Dirt Block HAHAHA

@@soodless4159 Lmao.

I'm totally with the idea of building labs that looks like cathedrals and temples

Ooh yeah! That is an excellent suggestion!

Absolutely this!!

Humanity didn’t accomplish anything. This is fake. As a physics major you should know that a camera shutter can’t move faster than the speed of light.

​@@Bowhuntertexas What an amazing observation! You'll be happy to know that high speed cameras dont use a shutter!

@Bowhuntertexas I wouldn’t normally wade in, but this is a frustrating comment. Just because you can’t conceive how something works doesn’t automatically mean it’s fake. Physics isn’t the limitation here - your depth of understanding is.

Mário Souto finally some quality Minecraft gameplay maybe?

A little low, but it’ll do

Ye but you have to download some more ram to operate it and of course you need the brand new 2073924749283ti ztx titan omega pro graphics card

tyrannus is that even a thing

@Ajgleskorv r/whooosh

The Mandalorian 😂😂

I’m just surprised that the thing that captured light travel didn’t explode.

@@Pain-xw1rj why would it?

@@ok6694 what??

I want to know how many GB/TB of storage this would use for one second of recording

Cos, or as some say, Cosm

​@@KaminariHouse Pulls bowblade out.

From our point of view though. The light itself experiences zero travel time and arrives instantly from its point of view.

​@@samuelhakansson6680it would take 4 years for light to travel from earth to the stsr mentioned here

@@showtime9878 not from the perspective of the photons, only for an outside observer. I specified this already, so if you believe that you're wrong.

That would have been unreal

That would be insane!!

Wouldn't you only be able to see a photon as a particle? If you're observing it from the gun all the way to the screen, it would have to behave like a particle the entire way, and it would only pass through one slit.

Measuring it with the camera would only allow you to see one result of the wave function

@@jeffn9952I doubt you would be able to see a “particle”, as a photon isn’t really a particle in the macroscopic sense of the word. But I’d definitely love to see this experiment.

P-progress

Stonks for sure

what a long way

Yea

thats what video i came from

If you want to drain your credit card go right ahead

Don’t you see how the speed of light everyday

donald wilson yeah - this is literally not the actual speed of light

@Junky DIY guy r/iamverystupid

@@adamfra64 r/ihavereddit

I think it was, because how would the pulse stay collimated after bouncing off a curved surface a dozen times? Unless they cheated and just put flat sections of mirror where they calculated the ideal beam would hit...

FYI that thing breaks easily. We introduced that in our factory a few years ago but quickly abandoned because of the high maintenance…

Thank you :)

Thanks

You deserve more 👍🏻

Omg thank you~

A god sender

I played the video at .25 speed so I actually reached max slow mo

In theory

Nope the max slo mo is stopping time itself.

Very true I was wrong

Impossible

Uh, no, not the speed of light, but the speed of light in a vacuum. That's not what we see here. And when not in a vacuum, the speed of light is not the limit any longer, see the Cherenkov radiation.

@@sergeyromanov2116 isn’t speed of light in vacuo basically impossible tho, since nowhere in the universe is really a true vacuum? Obviously we can’t observe that, it doesn’t really exist in practical sense

@@brandonhughes4076 how does it matter whether it is possible in the real world? It's still the limit that cannot be beaten (whereas the speed of light in a medium can be both reached and beaten, as happens all the time, I gave you an example). So your response is a non sequitur, since it does not address my criticism of your comment.

You said it right, not that we know, but there can be things way faster

@@saitoh5424 theoretically yes, but our models of special relativity and general relativity break down at speeds faster than the speed of light. General consensus among physicists is that it may be possible for something to be faster than the speed of light, but because the speed of light itself is impossible, nothing that’s slower than light will ever go faster and nothing that’s faster than light will ever go slower

Yeah, I had the same feeling as Gavin in the video... "This is something humans weren't meant to see."

But what if we were meant to see it…that’s our power as humans..we can take any raw material from this planet and turn it into a device..or extension of ourselves in order to see and do things no other species can. We are the true alchemists

You mean for a Pico sec..

What the heck!!! The movement of your stomach might be controlled by your medulla! Or your stomach might be grumbling bcz you were hungry.

I feel you brotha

What"shoe cover texhnology"?

@@Bluemansonic 00:47

literally what i did when i saw it, set it to .25 speed just to see heh

@@greenmist3182 still to fast

I want to see Gav and Dan walk out of the building still wearing those shoe coverings.

Кенп

It's so fast you don't see it moving lol

It’s the fastest filming camera duh 🙄 it can’t move

Squidy 252 r/woooosh

Nicolas Mir I was joking 😂

I’m trying to figure out how it is posible too. I’ve watched Versatium’s video and he said clearly that doing this way the measurement, the real speed of light can’t be measured, my mind is blowing now.

@@haroldy.estrada9391 That's why they are shooting the beam of light through water bottles and dairy milk. Light slows down depending on what it's traveling through, so they slow light down just a fraction in order for it to show up on camera. You couldn't film light going it's true speed because cameras need to absorb that light in order to create the picture, so the camera would be taking pics faster than light can move.

I don't know if i'm missing something here. But isn't it the basic principle of seeing?..light reflects from something and falls on your eye or camera lense and it sees.. How can you catch something that is allowing you to see in the first place.

@@someonenoone6653 exactly. That's why no one really measures the exact speed. When we try to measure the speed of the light, we are going to use our eyes or camera and in order to measure that, we use our eyes or camera lens, light also travels to our eyes/camera lens while measuring (that will affect how we measure the speed of the light). Isn't it fascinating? Lol

Seems clear to me that you CAN measure the one-way speed of light. The light travels along a linear path with distance markers. Count the frames, measure how far the light travelled, and do the math. If the tiny variation in distance from the light to the camera (or in the lens, etc) would slightly stretch the timing, then adjust for it with the math - these are known variables! It's true that by the time the first few frames of light movement actually gets to the camera, the experiment might already be over. But that just means all frames are equally delayed (no matter what the speed is from experiment to camera). In my view, how can we say this is not an accurate way to measure the one-way speed of light? If the key factor is EXACT speed, then forget about it. Nothing can ever be measured EXACTLY.

merica

“A trillion times faster than a drop of oil falling from a bomber”

Underrated

hello 'murica

Murrica

A real oof right there

Cool frame of reference. thanks

TRAS̸H DØVE legit?

5,000 years at 60fps?

sk0sH pretty sure game fps is different, if you play uncapped at 600fps your game wouldn’t be slow mo..

Thank you

Light one up, toke it down, contemplate the meaning of life and the universe :D

😂😂😂

Woah bro

You're hurting my brain

Theory of Relativity. No matter how you look at it, lights always at lightspeed, no faster, no slower.

You're*

@@m4271_ thanks

Our savior

Thank you so much

Ty

Now that is an under rated comment. I feel ya.

wow

crazy perspective, thanks for doing the math 🙏

Wow

Oh, great

i agree

I also agree

don't give em' ideas rak :D i like free stuff

rakhi mondal How much did KZfaq pay you to say that?

and God can move faster than that, how can the created be faster than the creator

The idea is based on a "streak camera", but extended in to 2D instead of 1D. They take a single image which captures some tiny duration of light propagation, but its time domain is spread across a spatial domain, so they essentially turn time into space, so it does not require an ultrafast processor. The resulting video is produced after the fact, based on the data captured.

​@@BrianPeirisif this is correct, this is incredible. I need to go and look this up. I'm constantly amazed at the creativity of inventions.

@@bladepanthera Since we can't actually measure the speed of light atm that is the closest thing we can do, guestimate. Still mighty impressive what a gigabrain thought that up.

EMK that part blew my mind

Got me too

to be exactly accurate 317,098 calendar years

Is flash that faster?

Let’s see. Based on the legend that’s about 17mm across; 50 light-picoseconds is about 15mm. So call it 16mm, which is 0.05 ft. A bullet traveling at 2500 ft/sec could thus travel that distance in 0.00002 seconds. Which is 20 microseconds, 20,000 nanoseconds, or 20,000,000 picoseconds. This video is slowed down to about 10 picoseconds per second so it would take about 2,000,000 seconds for the bullet to go by, which is “only” a bit over 23 days.

UNDERRATED 😂

10T+ years later: **windows shutting down**

And that is why we use google

Harris Holding google isn’t a browser

@@asdf14051 yes it he meant chrome

Exactly my thought! They could not have built all that just for taking these videos.

we can't forget about Stephen Hawking

He probably built it when he lived there at CalTech

@@flodgey Hawking doesn't have much to do with it, mate, apart from being a physicist. Plus, he's seen it. He passed away recently, not 60 years ago. Einstein would've cried tears of joy because he discovered the Photoelectric effect (for which he was awarded his Nobel prize), which shows that light consists of particles (refered to as quanta or photons). This can be seen here especially well in the trapped photon experiment where it bounced like pong.

@@lucifer2133 still moves like a wave too :D as seen in the last shot

Nope... He wouldn't!!!

That was a slow step

Thats what success is made of

Well, MIT did it 7 years ago. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e9qji8qAqa6xh58.html

Good luck trying to find something faster

2 years from now they'll be filming the inside of a black hole in slow mo.

At normal speed it just looked like a beam of light directed at the object because we couldn't see it pulsing at hundreds of millions of times a second (or whatever the rate was) without the camera.

It gets even more mind-blowing when you think about the fact that the observable universe is 93 billion light years across. Keep in mind that it's only the observable part.

@@swanihilator6748 yep, i personally believe that matter goes on forever. Considering it would be scientifically impossible for matter itself to have an end.

@@zxckon It goes on forever. But, then there's not enough heat displacement throughout the universe, and all life that relies on heat in some way ceases to exist.

@@swanihilator6748 And to think there are billions upon billions of 'Earth-like' planets that are within observable galaxies. I mean, the universe is so massive it can take several decades to reach one point to another, even while traveling at light speed. Yet, there are still imbeciles who 'refute' the existence of extraterrestrial species.

Seems like most people think that the universe is like the size of our solar system times a million 🤣 Yeah...MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH BIGGER.. And then that times 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. And then A LOOOOOOT more. The Earth is so small, it almost doesn't even exist.

Windows 7 is very stable tho?

@@Rohxx420 did I say that it is unstable?

@@rework3097 your implying that there's a reason he's a legend for using that OS, plenty of people use it so whys he a legend?

@@Rohxx420 well all those people are legends :)

@@Rohxx420 cuz I love win 7

*bad ending 1*

*YOU DIED*

yes

Please insert more quarters and try again.

LMFAO

That would take approximately 31,000 years

@@djaypop1 lolll

No. I am far too busy.

Sorry for everyone too busy I understand

I’ll give you a picosecond

Recording the 0.25x version And playing it in 0.25x

@@eduardispas8846 recording your 1/16 speed version and playing it in 0.25

Eduard Ispas just do this for a couple times

@@modle4108 recording your version and playing it at 0.25... *huge brain*

- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jamhfcx4ubPDZWg.html

r/iam14andthisisdeep

@douglas wahid The guy with the anime shirt that the sjws bullied till NASA forced him to give a public apology? That alone shows why sjws are the scum of the Earth and should be thrown out of an airplane.

How is THIS not in the news!?!?!?

douglas wahid source?

Your Gouvernment and The Press: keeping everyone stupid for another thousand years! You can count on us...

Pathetic, I complain that my phone only records 134,792,501,927,581,735,798,992,001 fps

oof my phone records at only 12000000000000000fps

My super low end phone has only 261836gb ram and records at 2737383693738fps 😔

Mines only 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 but I wanted 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 fps :(

While iphons will still record a 200fps and people will call it "revolutionary"

right?! i was ready for the rick roll...

Yes

I hope they'll publish something like this on 1st of April and people will think it's joke

Mmmm *luna* mmmmm

Dunnnn dun dunnn

DUN DUN DUNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

@@alessandrowda Yes.

The speed of dark is the speed of light going backwards.

No Vsauce: Or did we. Dun dun dunnn

So happy someone else caught this!

Matthew Chu I saw it too! How funny!

Windows 7 is just that awesome.

Windows 7 is fast, so I don't see the issue here ;)

Lol. American military uses Windows Xp

I bet that only us knew that

Windows 7 is the best OS Microsoft has made, it's been downhill for them ever since. Be glad it wasn't a windows 8 which is by far the worst OS to exist.

Obviously, the crude Mac rip off had nothing whatsoever to do with it, or could have been done just as well with a Vic-20.

TheZombiesAreComing - Best Windows OS isn’t saying much. They never bothered ripping off the best parts of the Mac.

@@Photologistic That is because Macs are made by Apple and Apple keep their products extremely minimalistic. There is literary nothing worth copying as doing so would be a downgrade due to removing features to fit the Apple theme.

Good one

You ain’t wrong

Not as fast as my weiner dog can pee on the carpet.

Yeah, I hate it then they're *droping.*

Still not as fast as tha weekend pass

and yet with all the science that we know , no one has discovered a solution to trafic jam !!!!

@@actesaadl8052 i think the solution is good and available public transportation and discouraging people from owning cars. Or nuclear weapons 😂

@@justsomerandomname2067 both solutions are good only in North Kores

@@actesaadl8052 why? (Obviously only asking about the first solution)

can't imagine life without a car, "here fuel is ~0.6 $/ Gallon "

As if that wasn't just for the audience.

would be nice

Unfortunately I don't think Gav and Dan really understand that this technique does _NOT_ involve real-time frames-per-second. It's a series of stills, with the timing advanced so many picoseconds for each successive shot. The record for _real_ -time successive fps is ~25 million and that's a framing-camera, technically, not a motion-picture camera. The fastest true motion-picture fps is 10 million fps, by Shimadzu's latest iteration of their HPV-X2 system.

@@-danR Could you please explain to me where the difference between a series of stills and a series of frames is?

@@simonwilson7581 isnt that the same thing?

are you mÖth? LOL

You should see a therapist about this. It sounds serious.

LOL. That's a good one! I'm joked out over that!

someone reply to this reply of another reply

BeActive Behappy im ya 300th like

@Dd Jim 600-700fps*

@Dd Jim if you literally search on Google "what is the highest FPS your eyes can see" it will say 1000 FPS. So even more than what I said, and definitely more than your "PhD" friend

@@benjyyy4168 you can’t see 1000 frames but you can see 1000 hrtz

@@sirtheodorethelll633 that's what I meant my bad

Is PhD means Pizza Hut Delivery

Quantum mechanics in a nutshell

Hitchikers Guide if my memory serves me correct?

@@joeythesaint8184 Doctor Manhattan from The Watchmen

Does that mean that you don't last long??

Dr Manhattan :')

And film that

@@arah8998 with a filming thing

Some say he had a raging stiffy throughout the whole video!

He had to call doctor after 4 hours @@Fuzion180

Andy Rogell Did they Test to see how fast it moved at least... for science?

I heard that he wants to buy the the world's fastest camera.

Thank You

Thanks

Spasibo!

Thx

Bless your soul

bwhahahahahah!

😂💀

Lmao

🤣🤣🤣🤣

😆

Digvijay Bhandari career*

aside from his spelling mistake, this should be on the top comment.

Carrier? Thats a vehicle right?

Cool personification.

NeroArrow PL Thanks! I am not good at english.

Śpectrę_A-259 you can do it on the 25 millionth viewer

Lol

Haha that's what i thought.

Juju

I’m the 22,168,389 viewer and I approve

They should have filmed that in SlowMo, its one frame from bare show to covered one!

Its fake if you know how camera works its impossible, if its true then world fastest thing is right is this camera not light anymore.

@@irigm6132 I'm pretty sure it's not just one lens, it's at least 5-6 to a ton more synchronized so perfectly against a mirror it looks like one camera. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong

@@clashmastr9895 when light pass through liquid it effect it's speed but still very much faster than anything in the world. If they had used multiple lenses and liquid many more transparent material still camera system is not fast enough to catch it, camera internal system which create frame works on electronic devices and speed of electron are too slow compare to light. This is a joke

A friend of mine *insists* on taking your shoes off when walking on his living room rug - one of those should shut him up.

Was going to comment the exact same thing XDXD..I thought it's impossible!

eh, it was still clickbait. just because it does what the title says doesn't make it less so.

@@rodrigoreyesmorrell5792 well no, the definition of clickbait is literally to put a title / thumbnail not reflecting the content. This is an appealing title, it's not clickbait.

the dumb thing is that this camera doesn't do any of this like a normal camera. it records a little of the image sequentially for each several Pico seconds. then it moves a mirror and does it all over again with the next laser pulse a couple Pico seconds later. it's not actually filming at those speeds, it's reconstructing what it would look like to film at those speeds.

@@Unmannedair they don't really have a choice at those speeds, they are literally trying to film light in movement ^^

Then also you are only increasing the speed of light

It's still light stupid

It's still light.

@______ shut up how does make sense as a joke

Big brain time

You are not worthy. Because you don't realize it is fake.

6.4 million humans later...

Just like karen and the kids Plz come back

@@Artur_without_the_H maybe your this persons dad xD

Bad childhood. Good life.

TFW you can't get the milk

In that frame of the slow-mo, you can see your dad slowly raise both his middle fingers before he vanishes in the blink of an eye.

Ty

@@uzairfly what does ty stand for

Thank You

I appreciate you T-T

U mean u came to that?

Ye I know I just thought this kind of comment would be a little funny

@M 42 Stop ruining the fun.We aren't that stupid to differentiate between a joke and a true fact.

More like: 60 FPS

If thats true than You: too poor to afford good internet Me: 1080p easy bcs im not poor

@@leno7492 watch in 1440p on mobile its better

Too bad it's fake lol

@@AndrewWhite6969 No it's not. Why would you think it's fake?

​@@tarmoheinonen4645 nothing in the universe can cross the speed of light. But in order to capture the speed of light you need a camera whose lens can capture photoes otherwise open and close faster than speed of light. So its impossible