So what?

Kid Starver-Leader of the opposition

Selections not elections folks .

@jimshelley8831 Even JC if he backed Brexit in 2017, he would have destroyed Theresa May. I'm pissed he didn't take GG on his offer to join forces. I will always have time for JC, but he bottled it. Just like Tottenham, ironic given his constituency has Arsenal's Ground's in it.

We are so proud and love George Galloway ❤️ doesn't matter what they try to use to smear you, we won't fall for it.

Like previous "Prime Ministers", he's a salesman who travels periodically to Ukraine and Israel with his weapons catalog to get new sales orders.....and frequently his customers make demands of him if he wants to continue getting orders or they may takke their trade to another supplier...

That was weeks ago and Sunak said that. Talk about being late onto something. Jesus

he's standing on a ladder 😂🤣😝

@@christopherwhittaker2620 👎

@@thomaskitchen6861 I’m not sure why you’re giving the Roman death to him sign?

Same.

They are nit the teacher's children ...so truebecause teacher's now do the job of parents in too many instances

Integrity like Galloway? “If you are asking did I support the Soviet Union, yes I did. Yes, I did support the Soviet Union, and I think the disappearance of the Soviet Union is the biggest catastrophe of my life.“ (George Galloway) I better do not want to know what people like you understand under "integrity"....

What a great comment

@@carrerau7138 what did the Soviet Union and the British Empire have in common ? So what’s your argument?

The B Empire is the king of genocide

No, Starmer is NOT pro-Hamas. Galloway is. And he always loved brutal regimes: “If you are asking did I support the Soviet Union, yes I did. Yes, I did support the Soviet Union, and I think the disappearance of the Soviet Union is the biggest catastrophe of my life.“ (George Galloway) What an azzhole.

@@carrerau7138 he cares about the Palestinian People and who could be more brutal than the Israel government

@@annenunney9907 There never was anything like a "Palestinian people". They are Arabs like in Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq. And sadly certain radical Arabs are rabid antisemites and don't want Jews in the Middle East. The Jews lived there before Islam had even been invented!!

@@carrerau7138 Of course Starmer is not pro Hamas and if Galloway has always loved brutal regimes then surely he would be supporting Israel and their genocidal Zionist leaders. even their citizens demanding they resign over what they are doing in Gaza. If his party puts up a candidate in my constituency he's got my vote.

exactly my list too.

K Livingston would never express these views

@@SheilaBloom. he is using the word 'normal' in the statistical context. besides I worked for a man who claimed to be gay constantly accusing others of not being 'normal'. I think it's important to differentiate between what he actually said and what some sensitive people want to hear it as.

@@justiceandlifeinlondon2888 Your problem is that you have found yourself trying to justify Mr Tw*t in Hat Galloway's words by further clarification- 'normal' in the statistical context’ & your anecdotes. Who are you, Keir Starmer?

@@SheilaBloom. Sheila you know George is right and that I am right. The meaning you want to get out of words may not represent the true meaning of those words and you know it. Some people use trends to argue against what they don't like and forget about logic completely. Some of us do not give into those trends however prevalent they may be at a specific time in history. To be honest our stances are determined by our personalities and humans seem to find anything to justify what they believe in. I try to keep a thinking head and not caring about popularity helps a lot with this task.

Nah we have enough people with an position, walking backwards to justify why it is always right.

Yes: but do we have to be so socially conservative? 🙂

unless your gay

Stands up for human rights, like anti abortion, anti gay and anti feminist. Sure, he’s right when it comes to imperialism, but that’s not a high bar for a socialist, that’s the minimum entry requirement 😑

He's also a homophobe at the worst or getting radicalised in his old age into anti-woke hokey-pokey grifting at best. He could have been a great politician if he'd had a party to help him stay relevant and train him on terminology and messaging.

I would if it's leader accepted other minority groups, but he doesn't and there's receipts. He's a bigot.

You think they will get more than 0.1 % next time, you bozo? 🤣

​@@carrerau7138it's a new party, just 4 years old with a MP and a handful of councillors. It took the Green party decades to achieve this. The Workers' Party does not expect to win the election but we can cut into Liebours vote and prevent them getting an overall majority. We can use this to build a bigger party that is for the working classes. Or do you think labour will make any difference bozo?

@@stookful Hopefully not. I like the Tories. Margaret Thatcher was a heroine of mine because she destroyed the Marxist unions.

Sunak glorifies the terrorist state of Israel

0:55 If Sunak had existed in the 1940s and there had been an uprising in a Nazi-run concentration camp, does his present behaviour suggest that he would be cheering for the guards?

💚🇮🇪 from Dublin ☘

can a woman get an abortion yet in Northern Ireland?

From Irish/Australia 🇦🇺 🇮🇪

Chrisum

Perhaps you should have watched this video too before commenting. He clearly says that just presenting that clip is the "stitch-up", not the interview itself.

He expressed his Roman Catholic bigotry.

@@kapitankapital6580 they put out a number of clips as a teaser to the interview, as they always do. If you watch the full interview, there is nothing unrepresentative or out of context about the clip they shared, it's a fair representation of Galloway's views, indeed of the political position he's taking with his party. He's running on an economically left and socially reactionary platform. As he is free to do, in a democracy. And others are free not to like the q333r-bashing part of his platform

😂😂😂😂😂​@@RosemaryBeeds

@@RosemaryBeeds this is what he said: "i don't want my children prematurely sexualised" Have you got a dictionary in your house Rosemary? Perhaps you might look up the definition of bigotry.

The Labour candidate, Azhar Ali, did not even attend the count. I'm not sure who walked off the stage, possibly one of the independents, but it definitely wasn't Azhar Ali.

It was probably Reform UK 😂

@@Pomegranate_Davidthe Reform candidate wasn’t there either

There was no Labour supported candidate in the Rochdale election...

Ooh! You're right, of course. Azhar Ali had already been disowned by his own party. I wonder who it was wearing the 'pink' rosette on the platform. 'New Labour' had already shown their utter contempt for the democratic process. I wonder if it was the Reform Party candidate. That shouldn't surprise me.

You're wrong! Sunak got a mandate to be MP just as Galloway did. Stop with this ignorance.

They were obviously talking about his current role (PM).

@scatmann5839 When did we elect sunak ? Now before you comment some silly know the difference between the words (elect) and (select) if you’re not aware of the meaning of these words then just say it will save the embarrassment.

@@scatmann5839 Sunak has NEVER run for PM - if you look closely,you will see that MP != PM - appears similar,don't they? Do you think it is a coincidence or that it is redundant when they say X is running for PM while Y is running for MP?

@@HdHd-hp6qz Your ignorance is truly astonishing and rather embarrassing! You clearly lack a basic understanding of how UK parliamentary democracy works. We don't elect the PM in Britain. The leader of the party with the majority of seats becomes PM. He or she can be removed only by their party. Was Boris Johnson elected PM? You didn't have a problem when Theresa May, Liz Truss or indeed Johnson became PM. I guess they're the right skin colour, and that gets your approval. Get yourself educated and/or enlightened.

Yep...support homophobia, China's oppression of the Uighurs and Putin's murdering of his opponents... Deafening silence from George about the recent murder of Alexei Navalny...

I'm not evil.

Oh no. Another climate denier. Very soon, people will be looking back on times of mass murder in Palestine and Sudan as a Golden Age.

I was so pleased to see King Arthur alive and well recently. He has been so silent for decades that I thought he had died.

...and the woke obsessed liberal elite.

Where is this, "true Labour"? We've got a right wing party called "New Labour".

same in germany. Even the party named 'The Left' is bad mouthed as communist when (rarely enough) proposing policies deemed centrist in the 90ies.

True left is a bit homophobic? What he said sounds like it would have been more at place last century

After watching that interview I would not say that in the slightest.

Wow the left is fucked if that's the "true left".

Galloway criticized the behavior not the person doing it. But Bastani tried to misrepresent what Galloway said. Like if you criticize alcohol consumption behavior and say I don’t want my kids to be taught that drinking is the norm. Then someone claims that you said people who drink alcohol are not normal. Galloway doesn’t think that people are different types . He thinks they’re all the same but have different behaviors. And he said he would respect them even if he doesn’t identify with their behavior.

@@nisahmed9121 No-one is misrepresenting what Galloway said, anyone that has watched the full interview knows this is deeply problematic what Galloway expresses here and all the negative reaction to this he has brought on himself. Aclohol is a drug that is responsible for a significant amount of harm right across society, not at all comparable to people being gay and the stigma surrounding that. There is hard science on sexuality, we don't have to rely yet again on what some older white men think. What Galloway is arguing is that he doesn't want a nuanced understanding of the topic of drugs in society being taught. And sexuality isn't a behaviour or a choice as such, it is very clearly who a person is and what they are.

I concur with kyletopfer. In fact if you watch Novara, you'll see that they did a followup segment on their news show a few days after where Bastani explicitely pointed out that he asked for clarification multiple times. In fact Bastani was defending and singing Galloway's praises when he won, pointing out that George joins only Winston Churchill in historically representing three separate constituencies in his political career.

I also find it kind of amusing how so many are getting outraged at Novara supposedly clipping Galloway to make him look bad, when they themselves are reacting to a clip of the full interview, probably having never watched it. And I'm not saying this because I have a beef with Galloway. I'd much rather have him in parliament than almost any other politician. I don't expect to agree on everything with everybody. But I would say that there's enough history with the man to think that he does what's best for him, and he's not beneath using issues, both those we may agree on as well as those we don't, to get what he wants. You can respect that if you will, but that he's right half the time only puts him a step above the likes of Boris Johnson, who himself was right on some of the populist things he sold, even if he ultimately never achieved anything with any of them.

Just another rabid dog barking for its tribe.

Me too. Now that's a Liberal, Red Ken. Just to be clear, communists are liberals.

That's probably how he earned his seat in the HOL and the 300 quid a day he'll get just for turning up.

The House of Lords has become a rubbish dump for the rejects of the House of Commons. Just look at the creeps who have found ther way in there, its a scandal and tarnishes wnat used to be the good name of the Lords. Can it really be true that politicians are the people most deserving of high honours, the very same politicians who have wrecked this country and sometimes other countries too?

NOW. Not before.

He has always covered a wide range of topics which iscwhat journalists do. ​@@mojo2679

@@mojo2679 Eh? He's always called out Israel for what they are. It is amusing how so many critical of things the "far left" are supposedly doing, do those things themselves while being critical of them. And I put "far left" in quotes intentionallly, because in many cases they're actually just centre left if we were in a sane society, but we're so far to the right that peopel consider Starmer to be soft left when he's basically Thatcher.

_"because so far nothing will change"_ It will; they'll have RED ties after the GE! 🤬 I completely agree with everything you've written there, brother! I've been a Labour supporter since '88 and I'm _still_ waiting for some semblance of actual social democracy! 👍✊

No one mentions the unemployed any more as if we don't exist... and this criticism applies to left wing channels where it just gets talked over as we have "full employment"

AOC gave a great reply to the equivalent challenge US voters face; Trump or the genocide supporter? She said vote Biden because it will be easier to fight under Biden. Trump will end democracy. I think it’s the same here. I don’t believe in staying silent to get Labour elected and I had to hold my nose voting last week, but if the Tories get in again they will continue to dismantle democracy and the welfare state. My biggest fear is a Labour Govt pushing an austerity agenda and that paving the way to fascism. We need to keep the pressure on to make Starmer go back to his original pledges and to end the genocide in Gaza.

Unfortunately Gorgeous George would probably say that those born disabled are not normal.

Hold your beer I'm still here ,,😉

Goerge and jeremy will make a great pm and deputy pm together and i do hope jeremy will jump labour's ship and join the workers party and go all the way with goerge..

​@@khunjam8852Corbyn is weak as fuck...sorry fans but he is

@@khunjam8852 If you watch the full two-hour interview you will see that this would never happen!

@@moldyolddough1 Exactly. George is a loose cannon with far too many opinions that Corbyn would almost certainly find offensive. I for one hope he stands as an independent so he would be unfettered by party allegiances.

Finally, someone honest.

Why not just publish the interview as is, no foreword, and at the agreed time?

​@@tubthump We know Novara are scumbags, that isn't new. But this is about what Galloway himself said, on camera.

Exactly. It was interesting and he came across well in some areas and not so well in others. I fear for his children if they don't follow his wishes when theh are older though. Novara gave him a lot of time.

@@samsonlovesyou I’m far more socially liberal than GG but I wouldn’t say he said anything “dangerous”. I know Christians and Muslims - and non-religious older people - who would totally agree with him and they don’t strike me as dangerous at all!

Also Jeremy Corbin but unfortunately establishment destroy him now they want to destroy George Galloway but time is change vote only for Workers Party of George Galloway

We don't really want "diverging views" on race, do we?

Novara certainly isn't far-left. They're a bit to the left of The Guardian and New Statesman, lol.

@@oneoflokis I assume he means diverging views relationship preferences.

well done! as long as hes not doing hate speech or oppressing people hes allowed to think what he wants... they asked him.. hes not forcing it down other peoples throats... i believe in equality for all... all races, sexualities, religions, creeds etc.. not just the ones we choose are more worthy than others

Great words. Yes, united front! ✊ Obviously we need a united front.

It would have been fine. But the foreword about GGs view being dangerous and its early release seems very underhand

They always release previews before premiering the full interview on Sundays.

...right but the stitch up came after in the selection of quotes out of context...also by Novara in their destructive review.

Novara stitched themselves up and showcased their own real nasty side. Goodbye Novara.

@MeleanDialogue I don't think Galloways quotes were out of context. GG is a social conservative, as are many around the country who also identify as Working Class. It's just that their view is articulated so infrequently by 'lefties' that it feels wrong. What GG did effectively - because he was given the time to do so - is to differentiate between Liberals and Working Class politics. I think the interview helps put GG in his own lane, distinct from other Parties- Labour, Greens etc. He should own it, I think.

This has also been an abiding concern of mine. I get the impression that the older TERF anti-NATO socialists (like me) are far more willing to agree to disagree on social issues & concentrate on the economics than the younger progressives. There's a difference between having similar values & having the same opinions.

Yes. We should be able to unite! As in the old Padstow May Day anthem!! 🙂👍

I feel the same way too. People need to understand the effectiveness of strategic coalitions. Allyship politics is liberal BS

​@@camdencobain1460I've recognised it's mainly the young left which take issue with Galloway purely on sexuality/gender issues when there are far more important issues

@@camdencobain1460well said

He makes a reasonable point about what some schools wish to teach his young children. As a father I totally agree with him. Please explain the phobias you accuse him off. The interview was two Hours long. Novara chose take a snippet and use it to cause as much damage to GG as they could whilst reaping the publicity from the “controversy”. It was a fail in my opinion as I suspect it will only make him more popular.

​@@yellow1one I watched all 2 hours of it and this lengthy clip contains all the context needed on this subject. He's a socially conservative man, in his own exact words and by his own admission. If a clip of him speaking uninterrupted and unprompted for more than 2 minutes is doing damage then it's pretty clear he loaded the gun himself, or at the very least it's clear this clip honestly represents his social politics. This wasn't even the most damaging bit. The man actually used the phrase "Adam & Steve" to talk about gay-parent families being inherently not as good as straight-parent families. If anything NM did the vile old chancer a favour by not just clipping that bit.

@@dadcraft9949 - I think you've missed the point. You may think he is vile, and you are entitled to feel that way, but please don't try to distort what he said. He said himself that he voted to allow same-sex marriage. He is in favour of same-sex adoption and families. He treats his gay friends and employees with the same respect and affection as he does with anyone else. He does not care what people do in the privacy of their own bedrooms. But he does have an objection to the premature sexualisation of his young children within schools. In particular, being taught that traditional families are the same same-sex couples. They are not the same, for the overwhelming majority of people on this planet. If holding an opinion contrary to yours is justification for you to label some as 'vile old chancer', I think it is you who ought to consider your own intolerance as the problem here.

@@yellow1one thats such a great cope , you would not allow that to be used by anyone else , take for example trump who after making disugsuting comments about black people or mexican people would make the same excuses you just did for this man , yes he votes for gay marriage and treats them kind , but that talk is still what fuels the discrimantion they face lol , or lets see him say i think muslims people should be treated good and fair , but women in hijab are not normal , not that i hate them i love them but very weird women , yeah this is why the left are a joke , they cant even stand up for good principles and want others on the right to change lol

@@yellow1one pretend all you want that he's the level-headed gender-critical-but-pro-LGBT walking contradiction you think he is, but the fact of the matter is he literally said "I'm gay friendly I just don't want my kids to be taught that it is the same for you to decide that you are are uh going to take the direction of Adam and Steve when the norm and the most happy and the most stable basis for society is Mom Dad and the kids". Those are his exact unprompted words. He describes homosexual lifestyles as a matter of choice and as _factually_ inferior to and less stable than heterosexual ones. Those are positions not supported by evidence, as is the case with the majority of bigoted opinions. So, he promises to maintain a voting record contrary to his stated beliefs, is the most sympathetic take possible. Which I would stomach. I'm not even objecting to that. I'm objecting to the idea that he can publicly express that gays are worth less than straights and have that not count as homophobia just because he was polite.

all they did was platform an interview with galloway, what was wrong with this?

@@cherylno583 they lied to galloway.. just watch his video , to screw him over, they are dishonest.. and tried to make him out to be a bad person for his beliefs.. everyone has the right to bring their own kids up how they like.. these liberal fascists want to force everyone to be just like them...

Nothing wrong with novara media. It was a good interview. George galloway was great to listen to and i thought Aaron asked appropriate questions

Novara being put in the same breath as the Tories and genocide FFS!

@@santinopaone-hoyland voting for a pro genocide party whilst knowing they are pro genocide is far worse than normal people voting for them who only watch mainstream media... the reason im far harsher towards russell brand now in the last 6 months even though he was one of my favourite people ever many years ago is cos he almost entirely ignored the genocide... its far worse when someone claims to be enlightened and knowledgeable in the truth and knowing how mainstream media lies to then suddenly be pro war, or pro genocide party or ignore the truth about a conflict to suit their own agendas than it is the people who dont know the truth and are brainwashed to believe stuff..thats why i hold russell brand and novara media to a higher standard and even though they are not technically worse than other people, i therefore hate them more... because they are open minded and not brainwashed and still making the wrong choice

Wouldn't it be better to build upon any common ground that exists (like solidarity for Palestine) rather than shunning each other and weakening important coalitions?

You advocate for cancelling people. How very right wing...

If you want to remove from the left anyone with progressive social values, then you're going to remove most of the left...

@@eemoogee160 No No No, we lefties must constantly fight over the minutiae so as to forever stay out of power. It's tradition.

​@@eemoogee160 No. Novara, Owen Jones + James o'brien are controlled opposition. They play to a left audience enough for the audience to buy their books + keep their establishment jobs but when a Socialist politician comes along these so-called 'left' help to cut off their legs

Well said 😏

The intro was cringe worthy, they should stop trying to appease the type of left wing person that can't handle hearing opposing views. That's why they do it.

@@santinopaone-hoyland Agreed. I'm presuming you're a Blades fan btw, so hello from a fellow Sheffielder (albeit a Wolves supporter).

Novara are elitists who support the ulez tax

It's a bit shocking isn't it? Can't the left work together? Why does Novara media want to take him down? I don't understand it.

they just let him express his opinion... this is on GG, him being retrograde in some ways

@@cpstr828 This isn't true. I watched the whole interview. He didn't say what NM claimed that he had said. Far from it.

@@celienat9369 he did. He said gay relationships are not normal. I know some Galloway bootlickers are finding a distinction between ‘gay people aren’t normal’ and ‘gay relationships aren’t normal’, but what’s the difference exactly? If a relationship isn’t normal and the fact that it’s a same sex relationship is the reason, the ergo the people having that relationship are the reason it isn’t normal. Normal is a pejorative, and if you don’t think so you’re being wilfully blind. I have long supported Galloway and always defended him against accusations of homophobia, but this is totally beyond the pale. And far from NM stitching him up, bastani tried to give him an out by saying do you mean typical - which is factual and accurate, as gay people are a minority - but Galloway doubled down and said no I mean normal. He doesn’t fall into the category of Williamson or Corbyn, whose comments were twisted with total mendacity to undermine and marginalise them; GG said what he said and it’s highly instructive to watch the whole thing, because his case is not only offensive, it’s utterly illiterate - he voted for same sex marriage and same sex adoption but he wants it taught that neither are normal? WTAF?

@@TDM1165 No. he didn't. I Watched the whole interview and listened to every word he said esp on this topic. You are hearing what you want to hear.

​@@celienat9369no. He did. He might be right. He might be factually right but insensitive, or he could be wrong. But he said it. Georgie, Where's yer trousers?

Really I saw the edited clip and the full interview. I found the full interview very eye opening, he laid bare his religious hypocrisy. He doesn’t let his religious beliefs affect his voting on public policies unless he doesn’t like them lol

I was kind of nutral on it.... What I like is that he is talkikng of the cultural flavor of the day out of California being foisted on the world.

@@urrywest really was he doing that when discussing assisted suicide?

@@nickygriffiths605 The media is on all kinds of cultural flavors out of California, asks all kinds of qestions that don't got much to do about anything pocketbook which is where the rubber hits the road. Galloway seems to always talk about stuff that really matters unless he is asked about these tangential questions where I don't really give a flying fuck how he answers them.

@@urrywest his religious beliefs and why he would make public policies around his religious beliefs are cultural flavours out of California? Look I get your desperate to play the culture war game in your/his defence but you see how it doesn’t apply right?. He was asked questions about a statement he made and it’s not been revived very well and now he’s on clean up duty standard politician stuff mate

Well, that's obvious. You are an admire of Jordan Peterson, you're socially conservative. Of course George Galloway's homophobic and transphobic comments are completely acceptable to you. If anything, discriminatory speech against gays and trans is something that makes a politician more attractive to you.

WOW! What a statement.

So you will vote for him blindly? Okay. I like to hear what politicians have to say and to defend themselves before voting for them. But yes, you're probably more typical in a country that would vote Boris Johnson as PM so maybe it's me who's out of step here.

​@@petemarchetto4998 where did they say they would vote for him and vote blindly? I think you need to retract that bs claim

@@keithparker1346 there is a question mark at the end of that, so it clearly a question and not a statement

The Catholic faith was an excuse for many in Southern Germany in the late 1930s & the catholic church never excommunicated one of them. But recently tried to Stop Nancy Pelosi from having communion for standing up for a woman's right to choose

Novara Media is not 'the establishment'. Get real.

They advertised the interview. His views on this issue are controversial. I don't know wht he is surprised.

Livingston actually spoke an historical fact. Bastant was poor on this.

Message to everyone - Surfacing strongly help beliefs of individuals who are seeking our vote and wishing to represent us is not a smear if these views are found to be offensive or reprehensible...

.....that would be fine if it was actually true. Novara gave him two hours unedited to express his views, not only did he express his views but he doubled down on them despite being given several off ramps. I like George Galloway and would vote for his Party, but he does love scoring an own goal and always has.

True. Liberalism is insufficient.

Also his weakness comes from liking Galloway but then denying liking him to appease his gay co founder and gay presenters. What is worst that no one seem to mention is the fact bastani and novara broke a deal of not showing any clips of interview before the election..and what did they do??? They show it a day before election when all negative headlines were against George. That is devious!!! They wanted to destroy his chances in local election and cash in from 50 second video out of 2 hour long interview. I lost respect for them. I watched them for over 9 years. When they presenting was still amateurish and new in the field.

Aaron Bastani is a socialist lol

@@oneoflokis liberalism paves the way for fascism

@@mojo2679 You are absolutely correct. But in fact it is worse than that. In troubled and economically insecure times, the liberal class has ALWAYS ended up supporting fascist parties. Fearing political instability and the loss of their wealth and privileges, liberals will eventually side not with those seeking to overthrow oppressive governments, but instead with authoritarian parties who will use draconian measures and fear to impose order and return society to the quiescent state it was previously in.

good... and i hope they all unsubscribe so novara learns not to sabotage one of the people who is trying to stop a genocide

My comments calling them out were deleted!

Because most Novara viewers, such as myself, like GG. The interview wasn't a stitch up, he answered the questions on gay people poorly but I'd still vote for him over any Tory or Labour politicians. Why are all GG supporters crying about him getting asked a tough question amongst about ten easy ones?

@@santinopaone-hoyland watch the vid that gg said about it.. they lied and released it early to try to screw over his results in the election.. or something like that...

Good point, he's certainly very much against drinking alcohol himself but not in favour of a prohibition on alcohol.

George is not anti guy neither am I or most people nowadays, George just wants his children to enjoy the innocence of childhood

Divorce isn't a major issue

This is a minor problemm Arent 600.000 dead young Ukrainians and who knows how many dead moms and children in Palestine more important. His personal family history is his problem. And what they cut is he voted for gay rights to marry.

@@keithparker1346 Not for George, he has had many wives.

@@christianefiorito3204 I watched the interview and that wasn't cut.

You watched it with blinkers on. The use of the word ‘normal’ is as ‘typical’ and the conversation about how he voted to legalise homosexuality at 16 not how Novara Media presented it. And you have also neglected the agenda outside the interview.

@@nottheandrewmarrshow ​ @nottheandrewmarrshow Blinkers on? Aaron himself pushed back in the interview saying "it's certainly atypical, but not normal?!", but you're here explaining to me how Gallower didn't actually mean what he said multiple times.

@@nottheandrewmarrshow I have to agree with the other commenter here. You are joking surely? AB couldn't have given GG more of an out to explain that he meant typical as you claim. He literally suggested that very word in place of normal! GG did _not_ mean 'typical' - he refused that term! He meant 'Normal'. Implying that outside of that, lies the abnormal. He was quite clear. The blinkers here are very much the ones you are wearing. He had every opportunity to clarify what he meant.

@@tcgfade0ut Normal is the same as common. Homosexual relationships are not common as they are in fact a minority of relationships in society. It’s not homophobic to state that.

@@jujutrini8412 Normal _can_ mean the same as common. But either you didn't watch the interview, or you are deliberately being disingenuous. Galloway, when he asked if he meant normal as in typical, said no, he didn't. Typical means the same thing as common in this context, and he rejected that term. He therefore, did not mean 'common'. He very clearly meant gay relationships are not normal. Not 'uncommon'. Why aren't you interested in what's true? Do you owe this guy money or something? Some of you in these comments reek of a cult of personality quite frankly. It's utterly clear what he said and meant - he fucking clarified exactly what he meant! Which is why he's been doing his best to spew a load of shit about edited clips and agendas on various appearances ever since - he knows he said something he should not have. You have a choice. Be against homophobia, or excuse it, and people like this. He could be the greatest politician in the world on every other issue - and I'd give him credit for that! But it still doesn't erase the fact that he's a homophobe. And yes. You can vote for gay rights (as he has), in the past, and still be homophobic in your personal views.

LBC are also entitled to their views aren't they. Why shut them down cos you don't like what their views are?

LBC whacks anyone that steps over the line. They've some good presenters and some middle of the road ones. I've warmed to Nick Ferrari as he really is an excellent broadcaster with a sense of humour. I loathe the odious James O'Brien who is like a windsock, a bullying windsock. Not keen on Carol Vorderman, she'd switch back to being Tory in the blink of an eye if it buttered her toast. Sad that Sangita Myska was whacked and Maajid Nawaz too. It'd be great if there was a radio station that covered a wide spectrum, and robustly and honestly challenged narratives. Haven't listened to Nick Abbot for ages but he's bang on point more often than not. Maybe you can get Sangita on for an interview?

@@arandorapress7561 I agree, they got rid of another his first name was Stephen, forgotten his second name. He was gay, like Ian Dale, but what the hell did he do wrong. He was on at 4am in the morning. This is a real shit station, and I am taking all my complaints to telecommunication. Ian Dale, James O'Brien and nick abbot seem to run this shit station.

@@ZER0-- Yes, but when they talk over a person who is giving their view, and then just cut you off from speaking, because they don't agree, and block you from getting on the air, that's not on. Not only is it rudeness by the presenter, but from the whole station. And many try times, they said I am the next person on, then another two or three come, then they just cut you off. They have done this lots of times, and they have blocked me, and many other people, many many times. If they don't like your, view, they just block you.

👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 not sure if they will come to our parts of uk. Will see

You left out unak's steps - so he can reach the podium

💯

I'm done with NM. I'm immediately withdrawing my donations to them.

I haven't trusted them for a long time. They need to apologise to a few people before I'll start taking them seriously, if at all. It's a separate issue though with what GG said. It's his words I have trouble with, irrespective of what NM did with them@@scatmann5839

@@scatmann5839 I haven't trusted NM for a long time - they have to apologise to a few people before I'd even consider it. My issue with what GG said though is his actual words, not what NM did with them.

@@johnpulman7137 they also like to lie about the ukraine russia war

Smear or just reporting accurately something important of interest to their viewers. Maybe don’t shoot the messenger, George said what he said and everyone needs to own it or otherwise.

I used to support them but i wont put likes for them. They are very much in support of lgbt men and women and they have become like any other media now that they are successful. It is sad how they laugh and joke about Galloway. Even during the attempt in Spen by election they were ridiculing his views. So i dont understand why he gave them.an interview. Bit then after we saw what itv dumb and dumber put him through he must have thought this youtube news channel at NM is seen by more people so let me go there and give a serious interview

@@TomMAF4 Let's say try to conflate his own private preferences for his children in their school experience with his public voting record as a politician. He was clear about the difference, but the host tried to "get him" on the contradiction that was no contradiction. As a parent George has every right to say what his children as minors are exposed to. As a politician he is dealing with the rights of fully grown adults. They were trying to smear his political character to conflate those two issues.

@TomMAF4 Let's say try to conflate his own private preferences for his children in their school experience with his public voting record as a politician. He was clear about the difference, but the host tried to "get him" on the contradiction that was no contradiction. As a parent George has every right to say what his children as minors are exposed to. As a politician he is dealing with the rights of fully grown adults. They were trying to smear his political character to conflate those two issues

#MeToo

Can't please everyone. I'd rather him than Farage, or any of the other STILL TORY defectors.

How cavalier you are with the term bigot

Oh I see! Like most people I agree with a lot of what George says and disagrees with other things he says. BUT on the whole I think George is Right! It would be ODD if I agreed with everything someone says!

@@SheilaBloom. Yeah, bigoted. Having strong unreasonable beliefs. Like thinking gay people are not normal cause your imaginary god created two imaginary people.

@@iamrocketray it also depends if you are being personally attacked by the disagreement

The point galloway made was when it was aired. Not what he said per se. Bastani and novara were asked not to air the interview before local election. They promised to him they will not do it. What did they do? They have aired a small part of it just a day before the local election. Dont know about you but breaking a promise is evil and that was devious. If they did not agree they could have negotiated with the interviewee, Galloway. They didn't. This is my take away and i am disgusted.

Maybe if GG didn't want the interview aired before the elections, he should have given it afterwards. It would not have mattered then. I'm not sure it made much of a difference anyway, as his party did pretty good in them. We don't know what agreement was made between GG and Novara on the release of any clips, but Novara are a media organisation, and they will promote a controversial interview as would GG for his MOATS show. Don't get me wrong, there's lots I disagree with Novara on, but GG needs to own his comments and how they would be perceived by a great many people. He likes to talk about his Catholicism, but omits that getting divorced and remarried is against RC teaching, even once, and GG has done it several times.

​@@hicky62yes but if they said they were not going to air it....I think you're victim blaming here

⁠@@hicky62Yea & the head of the church Charles can NOT be king bc he married a divorced woman .

I agree that airing the clip was wrong if they'd agreed to wait until after the election. Think that being disgusted is a bit strong though.

I compleatly disagree that if it was more hip to be gay, the human race would cease to exist.... I just think most of us would be uncomfortable and might not procreate as well...

@@urrywest I certainly wish some people would not breed

@@urrywest Basanti has twisted what GG said and it been misunderstood. Basanti focus on that issue, there a bigger issue here GG and his party standing in the way of the Genocide enablers in parliament. On a personal note my father shared gg views. I have a gay cousin who my father was very fond of. Always listen to under stand

@@lucyhenery2356 I am not sure there is anything you can do about people being gay/streight. I feel like more people are streight and when that is normalized, people feel more comfortable.

I'm a parent of a child well now adult who has gender issues...but it's NOT IMPORTANT as a political issue it's their internal struggle it's so minor it's silly

He clarifies his use of the word ‘normal’ as typical. That’s not the clickbait meaning that Novara put out though, is it? So is peddling a false homophobic quote what you’d call quality journalism?

@@nottheandrewmarrshow No no - he was given a chance by Aaron to say "typical" and explicitly chose not to. Stop gas lighting us! he is just trying to pull a Starmer now and claiming he never said what we all heard.

@@nottheandrewmarrshow user ck is 100% right. You do a lot of good work at NTAMS, but not this time. GG, as always, chose his words very carefully and guess what? Some people disagreed. Again I say, get over it!

@@user-ck3xz9so7h 👍

@@nottheandrewmarrshowhe most certainly not clarify his use of the word ‘normal’. You’ve been watching with blinkers on

I despise bastani now. I really really liked him. I watched tsky sour for years. They were also awful about Russell brand as well. They went all hog with the hate band wagon when he was accused by faceless women. They did not even tey to play the devil's advocate. I lost respect that day. But i still liked bastani. I now feel terrible even watching them. They agreed with Galloway abd promised him that the interview was going to air after local election. Then they decide to cut the bits galloway says children shouldn't be sexualised at such young age. Then he answers to bastani why he thinks it is wrong. He said kids ahould be able to learn what a normal family is made of such as father and mother. Gay and trans came from a father and a mother. A trans did not come from two trans men or women. So he used the word normal to differentiate that. Also why pick on the only true hardworking anti war and anti gino side guy that has all the media against him including all uk parties and prime minister??? I now think novara are fake. They dont care abput g@ -za as the hatched job against Galloway by bastani was to help labour. George avaoid them like the plague from now on. They dont care about pal esti ne. Their channel grew 400k since gino side began. They benefited from the gino side as a channel due to their growth. But they are just fake! I watch them bit due to extreme promotions of all the gender issues i did not subscribe but i always give them a like on issues of g@ za. No more!

@@zamzamahmed8139 Qwen Jones is the same as NM. Exploiting the gen oh side for likes and subs. GG is the real deal and this scares the fake leftists n libs

In the full interview GG outright says the gays aren’t normal. AB tries to correct him asking if he means not typical as then he would agree with what was being said. GG then emphasised he meant not normal. This is GG’s own doing and he should just apologise for getting muddled in the interview, as he is clearly walking back on it now anyway.

​@@garycannon2887that's only his opinion on gays though

@@keithparker1346 yes and that’s what people are taking issue with

@@garycannon2887 The word normal has multiple definitions . I would argue the most commonly used dictionary definition is meaning the average ,the standard or the default . Homosexuality bisexuality transgenderism is not the norm by any metric of measure . That is simply factual. Normal does not usually by itself have a value judgement attached . Yes unfortunately there are many folks who want to use normal to include a value judgement of good or preferred. If someone says that it is normal that human beings engage in war which is true I would certainly not assume they mean war is good or better than peace .

​@@garycannon2887I see because they're equating normal with "good/acceptable" - but that's not what normal means. Normal is not a moral judgment, it's just the default state of being, the most common. People are misunderstanding that big time because they, as most of us subconsciously do (though it's ironic to see the more progressive left take this view), view normal as good and not normal as bad. It is not good or bad to be heterosexual, but that is what is normal. Again it's not a moral judgement, but the most common state of being - the one that is most likely to be the answer if you guess what someone is at random.

Have you seen the AL Jazeera investigation into the Labor Party antisemitism witch hunt?

Nope, he was honestly right. Now, off to woke island with you before the majority of the population contaminate your feelings. And ....I suspect you, in actuality, have little criticism for Novara at all.

​@@T-Bone54No. The poster said they were against Novara's support for "antisemitism" allegations, which hurt Corbyn. #ItWasAScam

How could they be surprised about GGs stances on things? that's ridiculous to claim as he's not hidden them. Imo they simply don't like his views on homosexuality and trans/gender issues and can't quite grasp those are trivial issues for a lot of people

You think they did a good job when they threw the left under the bus during the fake antisemitism scandal?

It was an attempted setup job - they just failed in their ambush attempt. Why elese do you think Aaron's sole obsession was LGBTQ+ ? Do you think in May 2024 LGBTQ+ is the hot issue? Why was he not as much interested in Gaza and Ukraine? Those 2 are the HOTTEST issues today.

@@keithparker1346 Inequality, in this case explicitly stating that any group from society is not equal to another, simply because of their sexuality, is _not_ a trivial issue.

Novara aren’t the left

It's genuinely hillarious the persicusion complex regarding this. Galoway said what he said and Novara reported it in adherence to their principles. It's silly to squeal about it being an "op" 🙃

Exactly. People will make up their own mind about what he said. There's no fault on Novara's part.

Yes, absolutely. There was no "smear", they simply reported and publicised accurately what he said and believes. The full 2 hour interview is there for anyone to watch to hear what else he said.

Yup. There's no stitch up here, just further evidence of Galloway's bigotry and egomania

@@TomMAF4 Novara claims that GG said "Gays are not normal" Did GG said that? He said a family of gay couples with kids is not normal. Those are two very different and totally unrelated things. 1) Do you think those two are the same? 2) Did you hear GG say the former at any point in that interview?