lego falls apart if you don't glue it, everybody knows that

The kraggle is real! ;(

Me too

@@itskittyme legos aren’t meant to be glued. “Everybody knows that”

lmao

????

@@georgebenetton5828 the Roman Empire, sweetie. Think about it. 😄

@@aliciawoodland8330 You mean like battles? Like destroying it?

@@EagleAirwaysOfficalAero nope

They were all mostly Lego pieces that’s quite recognisable if you owned many Lego sets

it would cost a lot of money

@@Louis-pb4uw Thats ok, I would work for it xD

I think some steps would be a little too repetitive , and this is way too big , but maybe a small part of it as a set would be cool

@@alxssiaap1719 Yeah, I'm afraid especially the big show pieces i.e the Circus maximus and the Flavian amphitheatre, would be a tad bit repetitive. But just one or two city blocks, a temple, an aqueduct and maybe a greek theatre... That'd be great! Though that alone might make for a price tag to make you wince.

You could never afford it, except you were a millionaire if this was made by the foxes.

Gladiator, a film where Americans are convinced that gladiators were killing each other.

That triggered me too !!!! is it a joke ????

The artist himself said these pieces are permanent display pieces and often transported and showcased in many different events around the world, gluing would make transporting simpler

Why wouldn’t he? This display is (presumably) going to be shown at _several_ venues. Without glue the display would probably fall apart. This is true of a lot of the displays you see at other events.

The artist himself said these pieces are permanent display pieces and often transported and showcased in many different events around the world, gluing would make transporting simpler

@@jonathanjc1131that makes sense now

I meant legos 😂

​@@user-zc6ek7zi4h thanks for clarifying because you confused the absolute hell out of me for a second there 😂❤

Согласен реально круто

Lepin?

I don’t get it, maybe some of the pieces are special, they are still indeed made by Lego. Could you tell me which pieces you seems are not made by Lego?

@@jonathanjc1131 none of them have the Logo

Custom made pieces; for when you can't do it with the real stuff. Rope and so is fine by me. But fake pieces that don't exist in LEGO means you might as well just make a model from paper, plastic, toothpicks etc. It still looks ridiculously amazing, unbelievably detailed and accurate...but just like a matchstick model isn't really a matchstick model if you build it on top of a metal frame, no matter how impressive it looks, it loses some of the specialness the moment you have to cheat. Even if it is a small stain, even if this is greater than most of us will ever make, it's a little thing that does a lot of damage to the image. It's not a LEGO recreation, it's a recreation using plastic building materials, including LEGO and other stuff.

The artist himself said these pieces are permanent display pieces and often transported and showcased in many different events around the world, gluing would make transporting simpler

@@AlanXEverfrostI don’t get it, what are the custom pieces you were talking about? I played with Lego throughout my childhood and most of the pieces are very recognisable although some are rare. Can you leave a few timestamp for me to clarify?

Because rebuilding them means they lose all value they have as archaeological sites. We wouldn’t be able to gather any more knowledge from them, which I would say is of considerably more worth than having something visually pleasing to look at.

@@Rum-Runner There is no value in ruins. Knowledge? What else don't worthless ruin lovers know about the ruins they've spent so many years exploring?

@@PiotrJaser There is A LOT of value in ruins. The stones you refer to as ruins are the same stones that built an empire over a thousand years ago. There are plenty of archaeological teams in and around Rome that are CONSTANTLY making new discoveries about their sites. Just because YOU don’t know about it doesn’t mean it’s not happening. These sites are much more valuable in the state they are in now, otherwise they would have been rebuilt already.

@@Rum-Runner Sorry, but that's bullshit. Everything is a matter of decisions, norms and adopted principles. Just because you set something for yourself doesn't mean that others have to agree with it. In many places, other people have determined otherwise. For example, they rebuild castles from ruins, otherwise there will be a pile of stones that will be overgrown with weeds. Everything is a matter of accepted principles. Some pray to Zeus, others to Yahweh. Ruins have no value for me personally. They will be in even worse shape in another 500 years if no one does anything about it.

@@PiotrJaser But again, your visual pleasure comes at the stake of a literal trove of knowledge that would otherwise be lost. It’s not a matter of what fringe beliefs you hold, the vast majority of archaeological sites _WORLDWIDE_ are kept in the state they are found in for the exact purpose of gleaning priceless information from them. And saying that every archaeological site is otherwise “a pile of stones overgrown with weeds” is simply incorrect. Most sites, depending on how well-funded they are, are often well-maintained and preserved. This is because, again, we want to keep them in the state they were found in.