This Boeing 747 couldn’t STOP!? Qantas 001

Рет қаралды 454,818

Күн бұрын

Click my link and play War Thunder now. You’ll get a massive free bonus pack including vehicles, boosters, and more: playwt.link/GreenDotAviation
War Thunder is a highly detailed vehicle combat game containing over 2000 playable tanks, aircraft and ships spanning over 100 years of development. Immerse yourself completely in dynamic battles with an unparalleled combination of realism and approachability.
----
Support the channel on Patreon for as little as €3 and get exclusive perks 😎 / greendotaviation
Join the Discord! / discord
Become a KZfaq member 📺
/ @greendotaviation
----
A Qantas Airways Boeing 747 is on final approach to Bangkok’s Don Mueang International airport in Thailand. The airport is being battered by thunderstorms, and just ahead of the plane, another 747 has aborted its approach at the last minute. The 391 passengers and 19 crew are eager to get down on the ground. On this dark September night, however, as the plane nears the runway, things start to go wrong fast. What follows is not a story about mechanical failure, nor is it even a story about the weather, really. The story of Qantas flight 1 is a human story - a story about how quickly things can go wrong, once a few very human mistakes are made. It’s also a story about how even following the rules can sometimes put lives in danger.
----
All music licensed through Epidemic Sound
Final report:
www.atsb.gov.au/publications/i...
Thumbnail pic:
Aero Icarus from Zürich, Switzerland, CC BY-SA 2.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/..., via Wikimedia Commons
And
href="www.freepik.com/free-photo/me... by wirestock
----
Timeline:
00:00 Intro
00:57 Flight background
01:27 Pilots
02:44 War Thunder
03:41 Pushback
04:19 Departure
05:25 Cruise
06:06 Descent
09:52 Weather
11:48 Approach
12:42 ILS Approach
14:22 Speed control
14:58 Final approach
15:47 Landing
18:52 Runway overrun
19:45 Aftermath and Investigation
20:16 Training issues
21: 20 Crew resource management
22:18 Present day Qantas
22:37 (Reputational) Damage
22:59 War Thunder
23:30 Thanks!

Пікірлер: 456

@GreenDotAviation Жыл бұрын

Click my link and play War Thunder now. You’ll get a massive free bonus pack including vehicles, boosters, and more: playwt.link/GreenDotAviation

@suzieaustin.5905 Жыл бұрын

No thanks. Just want to say Thankyou for telling the story, instead of trying to read and see the videos.👏👏

@paintbrushdaddy3249 10 ай бұрын

@@suzieaustin.5905 give into the snail

@ImDredd4ever 9 ай бұрын

Love your content. What software or game do you use to make the animation of the aircraft? Thanks for your Time, Neil

@GreenDotAviation 9 ай бұрын

@@ImDredd4ever Hi Neil, I use MSFS (sometimes XP11) for these videos. Both are fantastic but MSFS is more visually impressive. Glad you're enjoying the videos :)

@Somthinglevlogger 9 ай бұрын

What flight sim do you use???

@NotTheBomb Жыл бұрын

This reminds me of a driving lesson my mom had taught me when I first started driving. There was a yellow light and I accelerated to go, the hesitated and brakes instead. I over shot the light and stopped a bit into the intersection. My mom said that day “you either commit to stopping or commit to going. Otherwise, you’ll fail at either.”

@onepalproductions Жыл бұрын

It was on that advice, you were conceived by her.

@YogiTeef Жыл бұрын

@@onepalproductions Holy shit! You killed him

@chaigonjenkins Жыл бұрын

commit to stopping when in a car for fucks sake

@asdf3568 Жыл бұрын

In my country I don't think you're allowed to accelerate at yellow

@albertchehade9916 Жыл бұрын

@@onepalproductions 🤣😂🤣 You're a cunny funt!

@kevinbarry71 Жыл бұрын

The captain and first officer screwed that up royally. Especially the captain trying to take control of an aircraft when he was not in command and not saying he was doing so

@streettrialsandstuff Жыл бұрын

Yeah and not only that. If you are going around touching the ground shouldn't mean you suddenly need to abort it.

@Ronin_marine 2 ай бұрын

Mostly the captain. FO didn’t do a great job but oh well go around. The captain just completely dicked it up.

@markheatherington8367 Жыл бұрын

My CFI drilled it into my head early on... You decide to go around, you go around regardless of improvements in the situation. I try to apply that to all aspects of my life. Love your channel!

@GreenDotAviation Жыл бұрын

Good advice! And thank you :)

@markheatherington8367 Жыл бұрын

@Garnet Holman Yep, I ignored that advice for 11 years myself 😀

@squirrelpatrick3670 7 ай бұрын

That struck me as the cardinal sin here.

@user-qp1vt3rb9y 2 ай бұрын

❤ LIFE advice!

@cherylmckinnon8870 11 ай бұрын

Three factors: Qantas had ordered pilots to brake to save fuel instead of using reverse thrust, the runway was wet, and the pilot was distracted by his wife in the cockpit. It cost Qantas more to restore the plane than to replace it, but they wanted to retain their record of never having lost an aircraft.

@muppetb.lansing8374 Ай бұрын

This is crazy. But its amazing what a bit of body bog will do, to get rid of those panel dents......

@feelincrispy7053 Жыл бұрын

Qantas has never actually completely lost a plane and has one of the highest safety ratings of any airline. One of the very few national airlines if not the only one to have never killed anyone. As an Australian do I ever travel on qantas? Hell no, they are super expensive, their service is poor and their food sucks!!

@timsiragusa9096 Жыл бұрын

They lost a few propeller powered planes

@Cingearth Жыл бұрын

Bangkok aircraft written off by insurance but cost twice as much to build 747

@CyPhaSaRin Жыл бұрын

@@timsiragusa9096 yeah you've said that twice without a single source, which I mean.. if its that important to prove otherwise, back it up. Besides that, have they ever lost a plane, has anyone died, you focused on a small fraction of that comment to what, be right twice?

@cathybaldry7822 Жыл бұрын

Hmmm I find their food court at every airport to be the best. Guess you just choose a meal that didn't suit your taste buds.

@cathybaldry7822 Жыл бұрын

@@CyPhaSaRin just for you since you don't know how to use Google en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Qantas_fatal_accidents

@1wor1d Жыл бұрын

The problem with any Green Dot Aviation video on QANTAS is you know they'll all make it alive to the airport, as to this day QANTAS has never had a major aviation accident, not one!!

@onepalproductions Жыл бұрын

Rainman told me that too.

@moizfarhat3513 10 ай бұрын

Why though ??? Please tell someone has atleast had a heartattack on the plane and died😂

@DanTDMJace 2 ай бұрын

@@moizfarhat3513Even on 32, no one died from injuries

@crumb_of_nopeamine_plz Жыл бұрын

It's only a matter of time before Qantas has a major incident. Alan Joyce has absolutely destroyed the company. He keeps getting multimillion dollar bonuses whilst the staff and contractors at all levels are being underpaid, overworked and silenced when they try to speak up about the issues. The safety standards are dropping, and I can foresee a major accident if things don't change. I can highly recommend the ABC (Australian) 4 Corners report on the state of Qantas, it's pretty alarming 😞

@alexdavis5766 Жыл бұрын

Was just going to recommend the same documentary, made for scary watching

@alexlents4689 11 ай бұрын

At least he’s finally getting pushed out this November.

@Bunnyroo7 10 ай бұрын

Alan Joyce is typical for his ilk. He sings all the correct woke hymns, but he is utterly destroying everything in his wake. It will takes years to rebuild Qantas if, indeed, they find a competent person to lead the company.

@ingridclare7411 10 ай бұрын

Alan Joyce has left recently. The Irish Gnome's tenure is over. He wrecked Ryanair before he hit Qantas. I hope we have an Aussie next as CEO....

@westcoastaerialimagery4690 7 ай бұрын

The longer you go without incident the greater it generally is, touch wood thats wrong

@sinoperture Жыл бұрын

What is missed is that the reason for the reverse thrust policy was a company desire to reduce fuel use/cost too.

@wilsjane Жыл бұрын

Reducing engine power to reverse thrust during a NORMAL landing is a good idea, since it reduces fuel consumption, engine wear and structural stress. However, recommendations should never become rules. It is like telling a driver to always brake gently, even when a child runs out into the road.

@siobhangraham7280 10 ай бұрын

Yeah but the pilots really should have noticed that they weren't stopping and that they had engine power available to stop them.

@volvodoc01 3 ай бұрын

I’d imagine air plane brakes to be not cheap. Youd think a bit more fuel burn would be cheaper. And less risky/hard on the brakes. 🤷‍♂️

@jamesdoherty3789 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for these concise, clearly explained videos. They provide the key technical data at each crucial decision point for the crew, together with the psychological factors colouring the crew’s decision making processes. Personally, I think this channel is superior to its rivals by condensing the most relevant data in order that the critical points of learning are more easily understood and remembered.

@CAROLUSPRIMA Жыл бұрын

Right on. Superior channel indeed.

@theequalizer2727 Жыл бұрын

And no ridiculous engine roar throughout whole video

@jbrubin8274 Жыл бұрын

This too is what caught my eye, the addition of psychological principles and how they are just as important than any physical component.

@donaldneumann7873 Жыл бұрын

The damaged aircraft was a total loss however Qantas chose to repair it so they could keep their perfect record of never having lost an aircraft during an accident.

@RalphCunha Жыл бұрын

This channel is by far the best aviation channel on KZfaq…. That’s hard to say since there are so many, yet the animation shows what the crew sees and does, even the part that shows the wiper switch being activated. Such small details add up in the end, showing in almost real time what they were experiencing and doing just before the situation turns critical. That puts this channel way above many out there. Another amazing video…. Great job. Keep up the great work….

@GreenDotAviation Жыл бұрын

Thank you!

@folkereicht5746 Жыл бұрын

You are so right!!

@desertstar223 Жыл бұрын

Try Mentour Pilot as well. You'll be instantly hooked.

@RalphCunha Жыл бұрын

@@desertstar223 thanks

@CyPhaSaRin Жыл бұрын

Yeah he's great but what you described is pretty much the norm, anyone not doing it at at least this level needs to pack their shit up and quit.

@scofab Жыл бұрын

NEVER let a bean-counter tell you how to fly. Well done, thank you.

@captaindunsell8568 Жыл бұрын

Ultimately, the captain has full control and responsibility for the aircraft, not the company.

@wilsjane Жыл бұрын

@@daftvader4218 Absolutely. It was the captain who was responsible in every way. Firstly by cancelling the go around without clear verbal communication, failing to retard one of the engines and reset the autobrake. Then failing to setup and deploy reverse thrust, while the first officer was concentrating on steering and braking on a wet runway. Was the guy arrogant, or just plane stupid.?

@CAROLUSPRIMA Жыл бұрын

Yay! Green Dot! Highlight of my day when you upload. Always such excellence.

@s.castellino4306 10 ай бұрын

After watching many of these videos, I feel like everyone on this flight we're very lucky. Hydroplaning is no joke. I take even driving in the rain very seriously. It's scary watching people recklessly drive or make minor mistakes while the road is wet

@agems56 9 ай бұрын

The only joke about hydro planing are usually the state of the tires causing it like very little tread or bald, or blokes that drive with the cruise control on in wet weather!

@Avgeek1564 Жыл бұрын

I find it amusing that all the pilots in your videos have Irish accents! 😉

@alexandernordstrom1617 Жыл бұрын

The famous Aussie brogue!

@Zelielz1 Жыл бұрын

How can you forget the reverse thrust is beyond me

@juliemanarin4127 Жыл бұрын

Or miss one engine still in full throttle. The captain had no business touching the throttles while not taking control. And not cancelling the go around verbally!

@ArtCurator2020 Жыл бұрын

Unless you are professional pilots, your comments make you look like a FOOL. It's easy to be a "Monday morning quarterback" when you've never even played in one football game. IF tou are S-O-O-O Smart, then get a job training airline pilots.

@Zelielz1 Жыл бұрын

@@ArtCurator2020 Do you forget to step the brakes while using a car and wanting to brake?

@dronepro7316 Жыл бұрын

What I was thinking. As a passenger I’m very cognizant of the engines screaming upon landing in full reverse thrusts. How a pilot with 15,000 hrs of flying experience missed this is beyond me.

@moizfarhat3513 10 ай бұрын

Be in their situation, I bet you'll forget the landing gear in normal clear weather conditions😅

@brightflame123 Жыл бұрын

Great work as always Thanks for your hard work it’s very much appreciated

@HD_555 Ай бұрын

1:24 was there an a380 in the 1999 msfs mod. As far as I know, the Airbus a380 entered service officially in 2007

@steve6375 Жыл бұрын

Is the cockpit really that dark (black console) and are the thrust levers really a mid-grey colour? Why do they make the thrust lever positions so hard to see in poor lighting conditions so that it is easy to miss one in an emergency situation? If the software relies on the levers all being in idle for certain crucial operations then surely all the controls should be designed for the settings to be as visible as possible?

@viharsarok 11 ай бұрын

A well lit cockpit would make it much harder to see outside.

@nysockexchange2204 Жыл бұрын

"Any landing you can walk away from is a good one."

@carterzielinski3618 Жыл бұрын

Such a great channel

@panzerkeks8530 Жыл бұрын

I don’t understand that Airlines have different regulations anf procedures when it comes to aircraft types, like the mentioned flaps etc. Shouldn’t this be independent from the Airline?Meaning a specific Aircraft type like the 747 should have the same procedures with every airline? For example landing in rain?

@ogaibo1316 Жыл бұрын

This is indeed a major flaw of commercial aviation. Obviously stupid, honestly.

@herpmcderp7666 Жыл бұрын

Usually the manufacturer's reccomended procedures are the baseline of safety in operation, and companies will further tighten procedures within those boundries to meet their own preffered safety margins.

@williamwinstrop3918 Жыл бұрын

“Landing in the rain” This summary of weather and a 152 ton to 220 ton chunk of mass is a good example of why you “don’t understand”. You honestly haven’t even tried to understand or even do the slightest bit of research for yourself. You really can’t fathom why not only would it be impossible to have one standard for all of the various types of “rain” and how to land in it for every model of aircraft for every possibly weight configuration, but not also see how stupid it would be to do that when allowing companies who have been operating 1000s of planes for over 100 years can maybe decide how to do it themselves? Seriously wtf?! (Edit) Also what powers do the builders of aircrafts exclusively wield that allow only them to understand the science behind stoping planes? Why also would other builders of aircrafts, in order to out compete the competition not only sell planes but the unwieldy science behind how to stop them? Also have you noticed how long the vast majority of planes have manage to stop even though each company has different procedures? Wtf?!

@ogaibo1316 Жыл бұрын

@@williamwinstrop3918 Its not just stopping the aircraft, but how pilots operate them. For example, an AirCanada A320 once crashed into a power line, because their standard operating procedures did not specify the requirement to check the vertical path during final descent against the chart on a non precision approach. This is absolutely ridiculous, obviously you have to check that on a NPA in complete fog-soup. One more example: Starting engines. Different Airlines have the pilots start different engines first. Why? If there was any inherent reason whatsoever to start a specific enginge first, wouldn't the manufacturer be the best to specify that, rather than the airline?

@ramsfan1st43 Жыл бұрын

@@williamwinstrop3918 always that ONE guy. What he's trying to say is: if two companies fly the same plane, why do they fly it differently? Obviously the logic behind the question being that it's the same plane, it should be flown the same way, depending on the variables. You sound like this guy I work with. He thinks you need an engineering degree in order to identify rust, because he's one, and did his calculations. Or something. SeRiOuSlY, mY GuY. WTF? Get laid. You'll feel better.

@jrhartley6742 Жыл бұрын

Fantastic presentation as always, very well done. As mentioned in the narration, I was thinking along the same lines, such contrast in CRM with the last vid on flight 32, nice touch.

@SuperpowerBroadcasting Жыл бұрын

It's very fortunate that everyone survived this.

@StevenOBrien Жыл бұрын

20:49 Use of the word "relatedly" deserves a like all on its own.

@AnimeEditors600 5 ай бұрын

I cant stop watching these videos for how good they are

@SkProductions56 21 күн бұрын

ha nice shot at 4:42... I'm sure this same exact frame was used in Qantas advertising back in the day

@megsybond 10 ай бұрын

The old saying, 'Too many cooks spoil the broth', comes to mind here. The Captain threw in some salt, and didn't tell first officer, who added some more salt without tasting it first, and it all went to s**t! They're very lucky that didn't end up much worse.

@davesmith5656 Жыл бұрын

"The crew watched helplessly ...". GOOD! I'M OFF THIS FLIGHT!

@jayvidhun6988 Жыл бұрын

Great video. Love the graphics. What happened to the crew after this incident. It would be great to know what happened to the pilots involved in your episodes. How were they disciplined, did it end their career or were they awarded if they did well etc? Seems like the captain was very negligent and hold much of the blame for this plane overshooting the runway.

@simonacuthbert1 27 күн бұрын

Another excellent video but there was an interesting point you missed in QF's efforts to protect their brand. They spent many thousands of dollars painting out the logos on the plane whilst the recovery was underway.

@northeden8661 Жыл бұрын

It's interesting to wonder why this first instinct is to know how to stop a plane on a runway. I drive a 110,000 pound truck and that is always on my mind. Constantly. Perhaps drilling this into the minds of pilots might be a good idea.

@Volodimar Жыл бұрын

I just subscribed to your channel and Boom! new video appears! ✨

@jiks270 Жыл бұрын

Great work, thank you for this.

@ryanvandoren1519 Жыл бұрын

Appreciate your videos dude, they always turn out spectacular. Keep up your good work. 👍

@GreenDotAviation Жыл бұрын

Thank you! More on the way ✈️

@deemariedubois4916 Жыл бұрын

A landing that you can walk away from is a good landing. A landing where you can use the plane again is a great landing. GOOD LANDING.

@stevenwest000 Жыл бұрын

Great video Green Dot. As always a very well researched and reported incident. On a side note, the graphics of sims are just amazing these days. Thank goodness no one killed or seriously injured.

@charleskennedy1712 Жыл бұрын

❤️💛 Qantas 747-8i is mesmerisingly beautiful

@PauperJ Жыл бұрын

Thank you for your videos.

@Hobbes4ever 11 ай бұрын

the 747-8 looks great in Qantas livery

@ajinkyamehere5365 Жыл бұрын

Okay, I can understand about the reverse thrust, since the captain had switched it to level 4 just before touchdown. But when the plane touched down much farther down And it wasn't decelerating enough, the captain should have ordered full reverse thrust, which in his mind would be a change from the current position of idle reverse thrust and hence would be in line with his logic.

@tjroelsma Жыл бұрын

The captain shouldn't have pulled back the throttles without notifying his co-pilot. In fact: the captain should have either done nothing, as his co-pilot was in control of the landing and already was committed to go-around, or he should have called out "my plane" and fully taken over control to continue the landing.

@patrickmollohan3082 Жыл бұрын

I'm also thinking that since Qantas promoted the Capt to Check Captain, he was leery of doing anything against Qantas SOP. That's all well and good in normal conditions, but he more than anyone should know that the priority is to protect lives as well as the plane. He wouldve went outside of Co policy on some shit...but the plane would have safely stopped!! That's was the objective.

@billythekid3234 Жыл бұрын

@@tjroelsma BINGO! this is all on the captain from what I've seen. And The pilot flying/ landing is the only person who should have hands on throttles. They were lucky it did not catch fire and kill many ppl.

@captaindunsell8568 Жыл бұрын

Mental confusion when too much is happening. This is all a lack of training which costs lots of money because you take pilots out of revenue generating mode and they become an expense. Penny wise, pound foolish.

@tjroelsma Жыл бұрын

@@captaindunsell8568 Agreed, this was a situation where training is meant for. For well-trained pilots a situation like this is the proverbial walk in the park, yet it ended in disaster.

@jtveg Жыл бұрын

Thanks so much for sharing. 😉👌🏻

@casualriley 11 ай бұрын

22:11 WOAH no wonder they had so many problems, they had lightning inside the cockpit!

@sylviaelse5086 Жыл бұрын

I'd have thought that cancelling a go-around was always a high-risk procedure, and should not be done just because a captain thinks they can land OK after all.

@antoniokastrocarlisledemel6617 Жыл бұрын

I thought the plane looked different from a 747-400 and I was also curious why a second officer would be required...as always thanx for these amazing videos and your narration and visuals..U and Mentour Pilot are my two favorite aviation channels on here no doubt

@adz4301 Жыл бұрын

Love this channel! ❤

@saveyourbacon6164 Жыл бұрын

I heard that the cost of repairs was $96 million. That was very likely more than the residual value of a nine-year-old aircraft. I would assume that the simple solution to getting above the glideslope, that is, overshooting, would be to pop up the spoilers. I don't know whether this would breach standard operating procedures.

@CZPC 2 ай бұрын

For some reason i never considered hydroplaning in a plane itself.

@BlueAirways Жыл бұрын

Cool Video

@spikenomoon Жыл бұрын

I love all the Air crash channels. The flight channel is also very good.

@ehilton7044 Жыл бұрын

I wish the flight Channel was narrated.

@ImBigBigNoob 11 ай бұрын

mr green: “in a few moments, the aircraft became airborne” me:”at 220kts?!”

@MarkJoseph81 Жыл бұрын

What the F was that captain thinking messing with the throttle like that, without communicating AND missing one engine... my God that is so frustrating.

@moizfarhat3513 10 ай бұрын

It happens

@htos1av Жыл бұрын

Good stuff-subbed.

@amp5275 Жыл бұрын

I heartly laughed at the end. Anyway, good for Qantas

@gwm_john 6 ай бұрын

VH- OJA , that was the 747-400 in the BKK QF , is now respectfully resting at Wollongong Airport NSW as part of the aviation museum 🙏

@jamest2401 Жыл бұрын

Qantas would’ve looked so good with a 747-8i such as the one portrayed in this video. Too bad they didn’t purchase any.😕

@colincampbell7126 Жыл бұрын

Great channel

@Alex-bn9xx Жыл бұрын

In heavy rain full reverse thrust should be standard when and breaks not great when wet

@northskyaviation Жыл бұрын

Just came across your channel. Great videos. Working my way through them all. Keep up the great work 👍

@GreenDotAviation Жыл бұрын

Thanks, will do! 😁

@mohammedabdurrahman5780 Жыл бұрын

Such a good video, did justice to the accident. However, just the sheer stupidity in this accident is infuriating.

@KidsAnimationStudio2020 Жыл бұрын

Qantas had many disasters, but no one had died! Good job from Melbourne, Qantas!

@781David 5 ай бұрын

Qantas has had fatal accidents, the last was in 1951.

@doublecee3385 Жыл бұрын

Yes it could

@nickpallitto1578 Жыл бұрын

The Captain and the Crews (1st Officers) need to start remedial training immediately. I’m talking about starting back out with a Cessna 172, and working their way back.

@titchlilly1294 Жыл бұрын

Remember one very important thing, Qantas has never ever crashed. Not even domestically. Qantas has gone downhill since that little gnome became CEO. It has been a slow decline.

@timsiragusa9096 Жыл бұрын

Not in the jet age. Quite a few propeller powered Qantas flights crashed

@CyPhaSaRin Жыл бұрын

Wow that's really something that you claim to know the entire history of Qantas and their what, millions of flights logged, must be quite the plane/flight enthusiast. Might be a sliiiight bit weird that you claim to know the inner workings of a company and who the sole problem is tho lol. Dunno who the CEO is cuz like.. who cares, but damn bro he got you sour.

@titchlilly1294 Жыл бұрын

@@CyPhaSaRin every Aussie knows the flying kangaroo. We also know that Qantas has had near misses to. The ceo is Alan Joyce less said about him the better. Yes we Aussies are very sour about what has happened to our pride and joy.

@CyPhaSaRin Жыл бұрын

@@titchlilly1294 brother I'm a queenslander. Pretty bloody Aussie. Couldn't give a shit about a CEO of any plans company across the globe tho. Last time I flew was Jetstar and I have zero complaints. But yeah I dunno mate last time I remember getting that heated about something is when they dogged Rudd. But politics effect me, whos running Qantas, not so much.

@titchlilly1294 Жыл бұрын

Nice

@DJ99777 Жыл бұрын

The Qantas never crashes.

@DEXTERSONEMANBAND 11 ай бұрын

Incredible… After all the training…

@ukraine7249 Жыл бұрын

I was a passenger on this flight. Really scary

@nicholasleavsley2231 Жыл бұрын

It's a good job no one was playing golf ⛳

@euangallagher7545 Жыл бұрын

Very suprising considering qantas is the safest airline in the world with not one fatal accident and they’ve been flying since the 50s!!

@stnicholas4116 10 ай бұрын

And this all happened on my birthday 😮

@emmabentley7945 Жыл бұрын

Brilliant video. Though it's not "Thigh" it's said like " Tie " love your story telling style. ❤️

@RickL_was_here Жыл бұрын

It is a good channel indeed. A few incorrectly pronounced words/letters and the use of "however" too much are things I'm sure he'll get better at.

@pauljordan4452 Жыл бұрын

@@RickL_was_here IT'S his Irish accent.

@Ete005 Жыл бұрын

yes sir

@G-bl8hj Жыл бұрын

The words “ I’ve got control” seem to be a trend in some incidents .

@djplayzyt1234 Жыл бұрын

Thank you got my recommendation again!

@MeaHeaR 5 күн бұрын

Important counterpoint to the stereotype of pilots in developing countries being poorly trained. These guys did a great job of remaining cool under what must've been a terrible shock. Same goes for the cabin crew, too.

@Menstral Жыл бұрын

Rain Man - Quantas - repair the plane

@darrenhibbert9331 Жыл бұрын

Sorry if this has been asked before but what spec computer is being run that shows these simulations? The graphics are amazing and very smooth. Also what software is it? Thanks.

@GreenDotAviation Жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoy them! I use Microsoft Flight Simulator, and my PC specs are a 2080Ti GPU, i9700k CPU @ 4.8, and 32Gb RAM.

@Ateszika Жыл бұрын

your videos are incredibly amazing!!!

@GreenDotAviation Жыл бұрын

Thanks!!

@351clevelandmodifiedmotor4 7 ай бұрын

15:30 😂 sure am

@nathancox6249 Жыл бұрын

Always remember Rain Man ,Qantas

@JJJRRRJJJ Жыл бұрын

It is very human

@captaindunsell8568 Жыл бұрын

With all the computer processing power available today, why isn’t more automation being made to detect and augment pilot actions in adverse weather during landing. Simple rate of speed reduction calculations could step up the application of more flaps and thrust reversers

@_Ali. Жыл бұрын

KZfaq offering me flying adverts in the midst of these is not appropriate 😂

@SuzyQ334 Жыл бұрын

I have no respect whatsoever for Qantas's current CEO Allen Joyce. But I have total respect for every Qantas pilot and crew. Despite the airline's greedy CEO Qantas still has the best safety record of any airline.

@pschweitzer Жыл бұрын

Great video! Though the aircraft in your model is a -8. Qantas never had any. Only -400s

@781David 5 ай бұрын

Over the years Qantas has had 2 747 SPs, 747-200, 747-300 & 747-400. According to Wikipedia Qantas has bought 60 747s, 57 new & 3 second hand. Five other 747s had also been leased.

@SeekingTheLoveThatGodMeans7648 Жыл бұрын

Digging into mud will stop a plane if nothing else will, that's true. Qantas dodged a passenger fatality bullet with this, though the aircraft presumably gave its all, the first for a Qantas jumbo jet. The blessing on Qantas' jumbo jet passengers did not fail. But the starkest lesson is not even that they came in too high and hot, but that if you're going to abort a go around, for God's sake at least tell the other pilots, who can then all concentrate on getting the aircraft to stop, just as they would in a normal landing. This plane could presumably have stopped, if perilously close to the end of the runway, with the reverse thrust going. Passengers must have been like dog our cats, this is a strangely quiet touchdown... OH! OH! OH! That roar after touchdown is a very assuring sound to me. Thank goodness again that nobody was badly injured or killed. One shouldn't presume on luck. I'd still overall rather fly Qantas if there was a choice. Qantas doesn't do domestic US routes, of course.

@EdOeuna Жыл бұрын

A classic example of how to not operate an aircraft that pilots learn about in flight school.

@inlovewithi 5 ай бұрын

What does the 001 one mean in terms of flight number? Do these number get recycled?

@kamakaziozzie3038 Жыл бұрын

So much for Rainman only wanting to fly on Qantas

@senorpepper3405 24 күн бұрын

No fatalities

@beatmueller6490 Жыл бұрын

Great A.I. Visuals! But some wrong choices were noted. For example, the latest Gen of Long-Range747s was used, which were not available in the 1990's. Also, an interior cabin shot showed a 2-4-2 Seating Configuration which looked like an A330 instead of a 747's 3-4-3 Seating. But except for such minor details, it was a very well well putv together video, and I'll be watching more! :)

@minitune7285 Жыл бұрын

I think we all noticed the Dreamliner engines from the - 800 but chose to ignore a minor graphics glitch as Green Dot Aviation videos are top notch.

@novacat5037 Ай бұрын

I'm pretty sure it's a flight simulator not AI

@beatmueller6490 Ай бұрын

@@novacat5037 Depends on what you interpret as a Flight Simulator. Airlines use them to train Pilots, but they only ever show a view that Pilots would see from the Flight Deck (Cockpit). But THIS Flight Simulator shows scenes from all angles, which could only be created by AI

@bigoteduncle 5 ай бұрын

So once the wheels touch the ground, you have to land? Meaning you cannot complete the Go Around?

@patriciamariemitchel Жыл бұрын

Everyone survived. All is well. Just want the crew to know, the damage to the plane, yeah, that's coming out of your pay. 🧐

@samarpan9382 4 ай бұрын

Bro thank the lord it wasn't a cliff

@FBI______ Жыл бұрын

Can you do a video on the 737 max crashes

@boggo58 Жыл бұрын

The cheeky buggers. The plane was a right off for insurance purposes ( don't forget QANTAS has NEVER had a written off aircraft) so Joyce decided to get it repaired!!

@catprog Жыл бұрын

Before Joyce's time.

@joseSanchez-ej2oh 4 ай бұрын

Donwang, Bangkok

@gunproofgrandad4381 Жыл бұрын

I can just imagine the captain saying, "My wife's gonna kill me!" only for her to say, "I'm right here, honey."

@Nehmo 11 ай бұрын

Roughly speaking, if you scale down a 747 to a meter, the skin would be 0.4 of what an aluminum soda can is. People think of planes as solid hunks of metal, but actually, they are very fragile.