wait wait wait, u have pet moose and 2 grown grey wolves? god damn. My cat could probably take 'em on though.

@@marce4241 Alaska’s different dude. He didn’t even mention the narwhal living in his basement.

@@CantTellYou lol, yeh i've always wanted to visit. can't wait

@@marce4241 No, his pet wolfs got in a fight with a wild moose

I remember seeing a moose from the highway once. It was a massive animal like a huge horse on steroids. beautiful creature!

I own a a second edition copy of that book! It’s so good!

Thanks for the recommendation I'll definitely pick it up and give it a read. 👍😉😎👍

@@OldGreyGryphon Good for ya 👍🏻

@@The_206 Found it at a library book sale.

Plenty books by Jim Corbett and Kenneth Anderson. Uttarakhand/India has had wayyy too many man eaters with 100s of kills. Leopard of rudraprayag is interesting too. Audio book available on KZfaq.

And we sweat, which I would consider a pretty cool, mostly unique trait

While that is true, it's little solace when you're faced with a tiger/lion/bear in the wild.

Hyena's are the best runners!

@@cobrabugs Maybe the OP should try to jog/run from a Polar Bear 😂

​@@cobrabugs not in a marathon, we can beat almost any animal. they say that a human could outrun a horse in a 25 miles marathon on a hot day

The book is absolutely terrfiying. The movie, not so much.

The French film Brotherhood of the Wolf (about the beast of Gevaudan) was pretty good too.

Personally i think bob gymlan broke down the lions of tsavo story very well even breaking down the autopsy of the two lions.

Yeah mosquitos rule, we just can’t count a whole species of disease-carriers as intentional killers.. but a single 400kg 9 foot tall mosquito? Now we’re talkin

And Jake Paul's music

​@@HachuneMiku01That part got me dead

Mosquitos aren't technically the killer though, just the carrier

Also, mossies strictly speaking, don’t actually “eat” people.

Well done indeed! All credits go to the moustache.

🫢🤭😁🙇‍♀️🫒🫒⚡️

Only sad thing is that he never cites his sources (even tho by research, he seems to tell the truth)

Bet you're gay.... 😂 (the Holy Grail)

I would debate that statement, but you haven`t yet payed me to argue.... although, I might argue with you on my own time. 🤪

"The advantage of the tiger in unarmed combat is that it not only eats the fruit-laden foe, but also the fruit itself. Tigers, however, do not relish the peach: the peach assailant should be attacked with a crocodile."

Or wear too many hats!

I thought he was talking about Night of the Lepus.

you might like lindybeige, who can speak about one hour without a cut. I think he even has a video about the lions or another good one is about a guy who was a slave to an african tribe.

@@fabulamcafee thanks!

Me too in the 90's when I was a teen with my dad too, sunday matinee's...great times...dad's gone now

This was a terrible summary. The times you listed don't match up, and various important facts are left out or incorrect. The tiger in question is named the Champawat tiger, not what you wrote, and it went on killing sprees in Nepal and India due tot he fact that humans had shot out several of its teeth and it would not be able to otherwise survive, Gustav was spelled as Gustave by the way, and this AI tool literally word for word copies large amounts of what Thoughty says. Honestly, I'm disappointed that you used this here.

Tammy AI? More like WHAMMY AI?

That's fucking sad. I love wolves.

You could just read that section of the man eaters of kumaon

I think he did

In that case I probably missed it.. Will check out.. Thanks guys..

What's the Promoyo tiger story

@@akashsuresh1369 sorry spelling mistake it's Primorye.. It's a story from Russia where an amur tiger tracked and hunted a hunter for personal reasons.. Epic story and he presented it very amazingly. Must check out

He turned it up to 43🙃

horses actually have a more effective cooling system, but we do have better endurance yes.

I couldn't have said it any better! Thoughty 2 is such a funny storyteller. Makes my day(although it's 2.35 am) too.

Yea I did some research and according to Wikipedia those two didn't really kill 135 people, it says: "a review about causes for man-eating behavior among lions revealed that the proposed human toll of 100 or more was most likely an exaggeration and that the more likely death toll was 28-31 victims. Also regarding that case, I find it funny how the video started with saying that us humans are weaker compared to other species, but if u fck around with us we'll have ur skin and skull displayed on some fuckn random ass museum for eternity.

@@Durcy Really I've heard the opposite, that they ended up killing like 400 people.

​@@psyxypher3881his source was Wikipedia smh

@@brandonburns5365 Yeah Wikipedia isn't remotely reliable.

Lol no

Legend for what? Killing animals?

​@@silentgamer666Atleast for killijg the Champawanth Tigress. I mean, come on. You cannot deny that is was necessary or that it was extremely impressive. But still, that doesnt mean Im looking down on the animals ofc. I do not think Jim beat that force of nature by skill alone. A lot of luck was involved.

@@silentgamer666You’re barking up the entirely wrong tree when it comes to Corbett. He was a conservationist at heart and that’s why there’s an entire national park named after him and the indo-Chinese tiger is literally named Corbett’s tiger. Corbett only killed man eaters and problem animals.

This actually opened my eyes. Im never gonna feel faitgued after studying for weeks on end ever again. Because people have it so much worse in this world. Man I didnt know.

humans are superior to all other animals by far, we are the first to dominate land, air and the seas. no animal every exerted dominance like us, it only makes sense our problems are of that magnitude, also it depends how you define a harder life, hundreds of thousands of years passed we are completely different than we used to be, hunting and being hunted is a different kind of life than going back to a 9-5 buying coffee in the morning. also no one is making the claim that their life is harder than the ancestors getting the wrong type of milk. the ancestors life only look hard to us because we are basically completely different, for animals its just how it goes its not hard and they wont procrastinate, thats what they do. so their life wasnt hard, it was tough but thats just how it was, we defined it was hard but infact we used to not care. so you cant really compare the 2

​@@antagonisticalex401it's normal to feel fatigued, and it's very important to take regular breaks. Otherwise, you damage your own chances of learning instead of enhancing them. I recommend looking up the pomodoro technique if you don't know how to manage time for breaks (make sure you adjust the study/break times for yourself).

How am I supposed to escape from a tiger without my hazelnut almond milk in my coffee? You snob

But our ancestors life was simple, today's life is way too complicated.

Mysore used to be a state before independence of India.

No, actually Thoughty2 is correct here (in context of the incident taking place in 1957). The state today called Karnataka was called 'Mysore State' till 1973 when it was renamed to it's current name. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mysore_State

@@swalihmm 'Mysore State' was a state after Independence too. It only got renamed to Karnataka in 1973. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mysore_State

@@swapniltiwari7152 I stand corrected! Thank you sirs.

@@CineMiamParis no need to thank me, I'm just happy to help 😊

Technically, we have. Just not like others. Rather than extreme specialization we’ve become some of the best generalist species. Not only can we eat just about any food, and are resistant to toxins that would be very harmful or even deadly to other animals. But also we had no need to waste energy on developing extreme adaptations when we had tools and other things to do those things for us. Few species are as widespread as us because many species are more specifically adapted to certain environments while humans can live just about anywhere even in the harshest environments.

This is true but is all mosquitoes not just one serial killin skeeter.

Yes. Malaria wiped up countless humans in history

True but there's absolutely no way to know if one single mosquito has ever killed hundreds of people

our poor caveman ancestors were prey :(

Yup love that book Very well wriiten.

bear in mind that I am subscribed with the bells on

And I don't read notifications as it's just spam for me at this point due to the unholy amount of channels I subcribe to

Same.

Like the groove on a sword or a knife. I didn't know that, thanks!

I just learned something new! Thanks

There are plenty of animals that can out run us tho..?

@@PandaPuncher4Hirenot in distance

we werent always apex predators you have to remember we were in africa possibly the most competitive predatory scene of nature, when we evolved tools and fire and we sufficiently utilized those things we started gaining our superiority over the animals, but Homo Erectus(1m+ years ago, i know erectus stayed later but that was about the turning point) or before them werent apex predators they just were not simple as that, we sweat and thats about all we have, later on when we developed tools being quick-handed and being able to throw projectiles well became the big thing. humans arent peak mammalian omnivores or predators, but we became that through out insane intelligence. so saying weve always been apex predators is flat out wrong, its just not correct.

@@spoperty4940 we've been apex predators for the gross majority of our existence. You're right, we weren't apex predators 5 seconds after we clicked the "evolve" button and turned into homo sapiens. But we've been basically a mass extinction event since we came into existence. Homo erectus were not humans. Homo sapiens figured out sharp rocks and spears very VERY quickly, in fact we probably discovered them before we actually evolved into homo sapiens. Even chimpanzees figured out clubs. And you can belittle our endurance by saying we sweat, but that's an oversimplified explanation of our world leading endurance. There's no animal on the planet that can beat humans in a three hundred mile foot race. Not even close. And no, it's not just because we "sweat". Turns out our ability to not eat for weeks on end while Also being up And active (ie, not hibernating) plays a role too. Even without our intellect, we'd still be close to an apex predator. Our intellect allows us to adapt, it's what allowed us to conquer the rest of the world by allowing us to adapt and survive in every climate. But even with significantly lower iqs, we'd still be able to hunt like pack animals, throw incredibly accurate and fast rocks to wound animals, figure out rudimentary tools (eg. sharp sticks), and run down any animal we need. Humans can hold a tool, and use the tool while running. This ability alone makes us OP. Were also the only animal that can climb trees, run on the ground, AND swim in the water. We aren't the best sprinters, we aren't the strongest, we aren't great swimmers, we aren't great climbers....... But we can do it all to a functional degree.

Did an Irish person write this totally stupid comment?

Same

Thought it was the crocodile too and this would be a video about the crocodiles that had Japanese troops for lunch in Burma

Well buddy, you were wrong😂

Guess he liked to teach girls how to do CBT

It’s my boi Gustave your talking about