Wow, thank you for the utterly fascinating info about the wild life that crystal has had.

Woha interesting!

Who is/was Rank?

@@topio developed in England by the J. Arthur Rank Organization

Super cool story!!

Ignored this video in my feed for 6 days because I thought it was clickbait.

@@St4rdog same

​@@St4rdogI ignored it because I had smth else to do, and then i forgot this channel existed for 6 days. also, I think the clickbait is working since they almost got 3 mil views in 6 days. Last video that got even close to that was the AOT one 2 months ago that got 2.5 mil

Fr

I avoided this video because I thought it was clearly clickbait. Cristal, forgotten magic?. . sure. :D

Too much reliance on digital effects in modern movies. A big part of why old techniques that worked were lost. Most modern cinematographers wouldn't know how to use the old tech even if they had access to it.

@@my3dviews not really an issue in this case, they were digitizing it. The issue seems to really be a "Disney dropped the ball" issue. They already had the superior tech but they failed to realize and perfect what they had.

@@liamnehren1054 Except that it wasn't a digital effect. They could have used two film cameras and got the same result. The effect was a result of the type of light used and the filters and prism.

It sounds like it was too expensive to be a widespread technique. Green screen is cheaper in terms of gear requirements, because you just need a big green screen and whatever camera and stage lighting you were going to be using anyway. The interesting part is apparently the prism they used in this video was made with off-the-shelf components. Maybe that means it'd be cheaper to make those prisms today. It really depends on how much labor it takes to produce and whether there would be sufficient demand to create an economy of scale. It still probably wouldn't be desirable for home use because you need to have two cameras with the setup they have, and the lighting is very unusual and energy inefficient compared to modern LEDs. If a nearly-as-good design could be made with LEDs, it might make it more likely to be adapted by amateur filmmakers, but that would require a different prism, so it's unclear whether it would be worth the extra R&D to design. And nearly-as-good, rather than just-as-good will mean that more work needs to be done in post to make it look good. Still might be able to get a better result than green screen, though.

@@my3dviews that is where you are wrong, the science was splitting using a crystal which had the filters integrated, to get the same effect they split the light equally and had the filters on the cameras, this means it is a less efficient method but works equally fine. Both can be digitized just as simply but one of them uses two cameras and the other would just be two arrays used for capturing images, in the past this was film, now it's photosensitive circuits. Guess what was never lost to time? using filters. This is something well know just a type of it Disney buried which was wildly superior to green screen.

I think the point here is that we don't actually need to. It'd be cool, but with off the shelf parts they were able to replicate it perfectly.

@@WalkerRileyMC theres absolute usecases left, just got budget at netflix for RDing this

These prisms are no longer rare we use these all the time in the lab. Sodium beam splitters are very common.

And ruin my Dooms Day Weapon? i don't think so

Whoever was a veteran physicist by the early 80s by now shoudl be a 80+ old chap. There are more chances he passed away than finding this video on KZfaq.

G&E Wizard Wisdom.

I remember, they were present pretty much everywhere. tunnels, street lights, etc. they were pretty long lasting and surprisingly efficient. you get just one wavelength, but that with a very high output, illuminating a large area.

@@robertheinrich2994 Last time I saw one used outside here in Sweden was when I was a kid in the early 00's. It was in a pedestrian tunnel under a road, and I remember it was always so trippy walking through that tunnel. Everything looked black and white (or rather black and yellow).

@@robertheinrich2994: Those lights were so warm and comfortable (not thermally, but emotionally), real shame they stopped using them much.

​@@hoon_sol For me those lights remind me of cold sketchy places, and stinky bathrooms so that "junkies have a harder time finding a vein"

This is somehow true

Lissan Al... you know the rest

That`s exactly how the Lisan Al Gaib would do video compositing

@@darosamath LISAN AL GAIB!

THIS PROPHECY IS HOW THEY ENSLAVE US!

You still have to be sure not to get leakage. You will also have to exclude sunlight of course. Or put notch-reject filters on your Sun lights so you don't get the 589+/-1 nm wavelength.

@@boring7823 it's a lot easier to manage that than it is to manage green screen spill in a tight space. In fact, with the right compact lighting, you could achieve in-car footage mattes MUCH more easily.

And we’re all watching them for free

It was wise not to reveal the arcane practice of _Blackfire._ Blackfire can be accomplished by igniting alcohol while illuminated with low pressure sodium lighting. The normally invisible alcohol flame is pure black....and creepy.

sat on someone's shelf somewhere as "cool crystals"

Reality is far closer to having ancient artifacts littered all around us, only matters how we look at things like in this case a Room for one colour.

*MacGuffins for the next Marvel/Star Wars/Pixar movie.*

CRINGE ALERT

Yep he is awesome learned about him In film School

He's been in Corridor before

what an amazing man

I spent many hours playing with that Rendering With Natural Light demo back in 1998 and had no idea Paul Debevec was behind it. Great stuff.

Oh, well met Luke

Same. I had no idea I would love this video so much

I actually avoided this video because I thought it was gonna be clickbait, but I was wrong. This video is legit. I think that's one of the downsides of clickbait culture, a lot of legit videos are getting avoided because the viewers are weary of their time getting wasted.

same here

@@One.Zero.One101 I think you meant "wary", but impressively, "weary" is also correct here..

Yeah reall agree. I never questioned how Mary Poppins was made compared to newer technology. I learned a lot and really impressed with the execution of this. It would be cool to see this used more.

That's how I feel about light field cameras, haha

The legend of Zeldzaam - The invisible cloak

Yes! Totally! 3 prisms... boring.

Raiders of the lost Prism.

I mean ... think about how much physical property and assets Disney owns. Then think about having to track and catalog the sheer logistics of maintaining data on literally nall of it and somehow not losing anything over the course of 100 years. Yeah, you try not to lose anything. OF COURSE if they'd patented the process - there would be records of how to reproduce the prisms on file at the USPTO. And ironic that they fight tooth and nail over Mickey Mouse copyright variations but were lackadaisical about something like this.

My favorite example is something called Fogbank it was a top secret material used to make nukes the problem was it was so top secret they forgot how to make it

Using it as a paper weight no doubt

I have a tiny one!!!

There are glassmakers who could probably make these things. They just have to shop around for them.

More than likely it's in storage at some warehouse for some company that owns the rights to it. I do warehousing for a living and it's incredible how much stuff just gets outright lost, even important stuff. You'd think bigger companies are better at not losing stuff, but the bigger the company the more stuff that gets lost.

@@ElveeKaye Disney tried for years to replicate the original, and gave up. It's incredibly hard to make a perfect light rejection prism.

Well if you think about it, they did, like they said the other one was hard to recreate and it only had three, this one is easier to recreate, if you ask me I think that's pretty special

​@@deadplthebadass21they could have just done a very similar thing to what they did here back then too, the whole custom diffraction crystal was overkill in the first place. It's really just the difference between operating budgets and how far money could really go back then.

We still can’t replicate some of the stuff divinci made so…

​@@KironX1but they already replicate it, just have to share it lol

@@deadplthebadass21and it is better because you can use different band pass filters to choose other colors and use lasers to illuminate the backdrop

Is Mickey in the room with us right now?

Especially if you're a minor and on your own.

And probabaly pay a lot to get these made

Disney rn tryin' their best on how to sue them 💀💀😂

DISNEY wishes to DISable your spine.

As a guy that was raised around engineers and artists, I'm sure it's sittin on some guy's mantel or computer desk collecting dust with other random knickknacks and the owner having absolutely no idea of its historical significance. it's a pretty glass cube. Or in a vault kicked under a rack somewhere. Sure.

Apparently, the actual prism itself is located at The Walt Disney Family Museum in San Francisco on display for all to see, from what I discovered through research.

its not lost at disney. its in safe keepings

@@41nhs But there were two others. Where are they?

@@RamDragon32I feel like you missed a good chance to use the word tchotchke instead knickknack. Next time.

"And I took that personally"

And. He proceeded to resurrect long lost revolutionary photographic items just to make that huge respects

@@XliverXD Revolutionary... for 60 years ago.

@@vyor8837 but it wasse losttt

It sounds like something from Death Stranding.

I read this as well! I guess we live in a day and age now where things that took a lot of precision and skill are now just more reachable and less costly to produce :)

@@RicardoMusch I find it a little funny that they failed to recreate the highly technical filtered beam splitting prism and never considered that they could just filter the outputs separately rather than doing so within the prism, as they did here. Or maybe they did and the trouble was with creating a narrow band filter at exactly 589nm, which would make more sense, and because of laser sciences we just have a more mature understanding of the processes involved.

Indiana Jones? That you?

​@@maih600The chances are real that these techniques were appropriated by "secret" services and used for propaganda. Deliverately kept from the industry and public.

they just used a normal beam splitter then filtered the output of it.

I was just about to say that.

It’s definitely one of the episodes of corridor crew.

Yes, a fitting word “discovery” yeah its an age old forgotten tech but mannn , they just revived it and now the possibilities are now endless at this point

not enough wren brings the ranking down

This is probably my favorite non-Vfx artist explains stuff video. Wren's videos just hit different. Primarily because they do what they say. Use visual medium to dumb down things people should have an idea of. I can't imagine being able to share this as someone's first Corridor video, which I can do with Wren's videos. But I can share it to someone curious about old school vfx.

Good luck with your janky rig Joel

If there were such a thing as a "universal rig" we would all rent it like a panaflex.

I agree, i'm often wrong but i really think these guys have stumbled on to something big for the industry of filmmaking

The only thing more unbelievable is the fact that Disney built this technology 60~ years ago and apparently decided to stop using it.. this is the holy grail of keying footage!

This is a bit sad to see that people think this is impossible to do this, cause in fact it was done by many company other than disney and there is plenty of patents in the last 60 years to proove it. I guess the problem is not the technology itself, but that no one put money into pushing aside greenscreen, to help movie making to move forward and put to garbage this greenscreen keying create in the 1930's. 😢

@@fabfourdub1284 it’s still impressive

It's probably by the economics of it, green screen is much cheaper to mass produce, and it was probably a matter of logistics. The results to cost must have been acceptable enough to push the compromises onto the creatives.

I read that when presented with the script to THE 3 WORLDS OF GULLIVER (1960), Ray Harryhausen insisted on doing it in England, where he could get access to the sodium vapor process. Even then, Harryhausen didn’t want to fool with the often unreliable blue screen process. He used the process on GULLIVER, THE MYSTERIOUS ISLAND (1961), and JASON AND THE ARGONAUTS (1963). Apparently it was no longer available to him for THE FIRST MEN IN THE MOON (1964), which utilized blue screen. Oddly, the technique was used on Herman Cohen’s KONGA (1961), and about the only impressive thing about that movie (and apparently the VFX person responsible for it, wasn’t credited on it, perhaps by choice). I wonder if it was used on THE CRAWLING EYE (1958).

salvaging old tech as it has a purpose, and repurposing otherwise obsolete old tech. i feel a dive into history books is always an inspiration when designing...

they weren't lost. elsewhere in this thread someone said one is on display at the Walt Disney museum.

How do you know it is the real deal​@@mewmew32

In the 60s there were still people who could make custom, precision optics by hand, leftover from WW2. That's likely how those prisms were made, and also why they haven't been made since. It's the same reason we can't make the F1 rocket anymore.

Instead of micro nanofabrication methods, now you can use...😎Nico nanofabrication methods.

Is it still hard to create a prism like that today? I feel like saying it‘s not possible is the same as saying „we couldn‘t build the pyramids today“

Same here bud. I was HYPED when I saw the results. Its 2 am and I'm tryn so hard to hold my excitement!

​@@samfiles8909 another Aussie bloke?

If this can become an affordable method, it might just be a budget option for smaller productions but big industry films are probably better off with LED video backgrounds.

Likewise. As someone else mentioned in the comment: even a 10k investment for actual perfect compositing is nothing for a big studio, it's insane the tech wasn't recreated...

@@nhiko999 I've handled lenses worth more than that. 10k is literally a drop in the bucket for a big studio.

Tbf a lot of big channels who use chapters do this. But yeah, it is always appreciated

Sometimes the fact that I developed a nose for such things scares me.

You sound like you're new here

sponsor block addon will show you where ads begin and end

@@alexmehler6765 nice

I'm gonna be the grammar police, sorry in advance. Infinitesimal means a Very Very small amount. If post is infinitesimally easier, then it barely changed at all. "All the extra pre-production work made post Infinitely easier" would make much more sense.

Definitely has the same feeling of analog photography and all the setup and lighting versus digital photography where it is all post for sure.

@@Sacomoponycam Nah, get'em grammar police are annoying, vocab police are needed. Words are important!

It's biggest achilles heel is that it only works in a limited area, indoors, with no outside lighting. Maybe it'd be fine in caves or buildings where a few characters barely move, but any big action scene wouldn't work. It'd be great for streaming though.

​@@Appletank8 did you not watch Mary Poppins? With the rig they created here they just need bigger sources of lights to light a bigger background and more space in front to stand the actors and light them. In essence, a bigger studio. They can rent a studio and do all sort of shots to keep testing this technique

I had the same reaction. I new immediately what the video was about when I saw the thumbnail. I don't even do video production or anything.

It isn't a lost technique it was retired, Disney decided it was no longer worth the effort, and it provides no benefit while having massive draw backs. Disney is simply so good at green screen this lazy technique isn't worth it. It also doesn't look nearly as good as good green screen.

What I got from the video isn't that the intent of bringing this back would be to use it as a mainstream technique but to use it as machine learning feed in order to improve the current green screen tech. There are other things to consider such as cost, accessibility, user friendliness and so on, but you can only do so much with an early prototype.

@@MegaLokopo it’s difficult to set up, impossible for large sets or complex geometry, and requires an indoor studio and no natural lighting. That said, it lacks that sharp visual edge that screams effects and can easily do transparencies. If the technique was developed over the decades instead of retired, I think it would have a place in filmography, likely in creating background elements outside cars, windows, etc on closed sets that they want to appear to be outside/in space/wherever.

@@maih600 Exactly, this technique is a new tool(outside of Disney, at any rate), with use cases we haven't even begun to consider. Find those use cases, make a case to the major filmmakers, and develop it's place not as a replacement, but as a new option for shots that are not possible with existing techniques and tools.

"Search and you will find." Jesus Christ

The crazy thing is, they took the research and actually simplified and thereby improved on the design - this was made with off the shelf parts!

@@kcdsTM its also that off the shelf parts are now way better.

I'm guessing that there weren't that many people trying. Especially in the digital age when you can mask things based on any channel of the image. There's no inherent reason why you have to use green or blue for the masking, those are just the most commonly used ones.

According to wikipedia, well first off only 3 were made, so if you wanted to use it, you better get in line. Second, it seemed that computers got good enough they were able to composite well enough, and tech advanced towards fixing it better and better. Software, once perfected, can be replicated a functionally infinite amount of times, along with the person who trained on it. A hardware solution needs to be made one at a time, and unless they acquire one for themselves, is probably stuck with the film company.

off the shelf filters exist because LPS lamps are often used around observatories for street lighting, the same reason they are used in this effects shot. An extremely specific frequency of light. Meaning it can be filtered without losing what one is looking for.

@@SmallSpoonBrigade with digital cameras, green is most often used for marking because it is often has a higher quality than red or blue due to how the sensor is designed

If I understand correctly (which is a big if), the original method uses all of the light and just redirects the sodium line. I think this setup is splitting all of the light and filtering the two halves. The advantage is that you don't need special prisms, but the disadvantage is that you cut your light in half. I don't know if low light is a major problem or not.

cardboard is kind of high tech

THE ALMIGHTY… Cardboard???

idk man cardboard is kind of a miracle. Most things arent shipped in crates or barrels now, instead its cardboard boxes. Obviously some things will still be crated, but the majority of consumer goods are gunna be put in a cardboard box. Its as high tech as we got right now.

@@TopatTom my dad used to tell me one of our greatest achievement's during WW2 was when the Japanese sent us the world's smallest drill bit and we sent it back with a hole drilled through it. sometimes the smallest thing's or thing's we don't think are impressive are the most impressive.

As I'm looking into a rabbit hole of cardboard, I'm actually stepping my brain back a bit. Just imagine them: Paper towel tubes, foil tubes, sheets, business cards, cereal boxes, Cracker Boxes, Everything Little Debbies, Birthday cards, Playing Cards, Egg Cartons, Literally anything bought online over 2 pounds in weight, Jigsaw puzzles, Poster Boards, Printer papers, Hardcover Books, Election cards, Testing Punch Cards, Milk Cartons!, Cardboard Furniture?! [which is a thing apparently], 3D Display Models!, School STEAM projects, Cigarette packs, A Oyster Pail for your Chinese Food!, Freaking Juice Boxes, THE FLIPPIN PIZZA BOX! It's everywhere, lol. It haunts me now. :P And pretty much anything modern electronic/technology based comes in a petite little..... CARDBOARD Box

It'd be worth it in high budget too. They could utilize the effort of having to change 400 different settings constantly to make it "perfect" into other portions of the film. CGI would probably be drastically improved in film compared to what it is now.

The only giant limitation I would say is when it comes to shooting outdoors. Earlier in the video, they needed to block the skylight. Like, filming with natural light is already a pain (trust me I’ve been there). But now you have to make sure All of that natural light doesn’t spill into the lighting of both your foreground AND background . It’s basically all the difficulties of controlled green screen lighting times 10

YES DUDE THAT"S WHAT I THOUGHT THIS COULD REVOLUTIONIZE ALL OF FILM PRODUCTION!

@@christie_brown why would you need to film outdoors if you're replacing the background anyway?

@@christie_brownthe thing is, you only ever film outdoors on a set when you DONT need to replace the background. Everything else is filmed indoors over a green screen. So you wouldn’t need to use this technique outdoors because you’re already getting what you want

they just changed the vfx game

@@LightSourceTemple *restored

The Omnissiah is pleased

I would rather keep it a secret, but yeah, this is cool.

​@@eugenetswongwhy?

Yeah this is such amazing stuff.

Yeah, I remember back when they did that stuff with Ai, people started badmouthing them, but they could never make me hate corridor.

It’s impossible to hate Corridor.

Is that a movie?

dude I've been watching corridor for many years. They never dissapoint, but this video was almost emotional for me. y'all stumbled across a gold mine here

that was my reaction too, haha

@@virkots Until you realize the dress is transparent....

The green screen footage only looks clean until you notice how b0rked the color of the dress is and the fact that when she turns the wrong way it causes her torso to disappear. It's a good effort, but one that took a fair bit of clean up to get vs this sodium yellow screen technique which basically just works well out of the box. The only thing missing now is to make the entire system more compact and to replace the dated sodium vapor bulbs with yellow 589nm emitting quantum dot leds.

@@mnomadvfx What's wrong with the bulbs?

@@falleithani5411 Expense and storage - LEDS are much more compact and easier to store and move around. sodium vapor bulbs are, comparatively, quite fragile.

Yes, I feel like a boomer, im 20-21 and when I go through the internet I feel like im going through a mind field of junk. I can barely even open up my computer anymore, unless I am studying for UNI. Its a breath of fresh air to open the internet and actually watch someone that adds to my IQ. Magic mushrooms are the only thing keeping me sane.

So true, these days mostly just clickbaits or stupidity.

LOL , then you need to freaking wider your search horizon mate . Plenty of actualy cool, insane, and wild things to watch here.

@@protips6924 There's definitely gems out there still, but I see what you mean.

@@protips6924 Sounds like you're on good tracks. Internet is wonderful but it's best used in moderation

I'm stocking up on sodium bulb manufacturer shares because there is no going back to chroma.

🤣

Ray Harryhausen used it for all his Sinbad movies

Astronomers used to rely on the fact that sodium vapour lamps were used in most street lighting, and they could just notch it out of their images. It's surprising it wasn't used more widely for vfx.

I LOVE the meeting of art, science & artisan skills: making those prisms must have been like a science-informed dark art!

RIP for the VFX Artists who Spent 10.000 hours manually Rotoscoping frame by frame, it's as if their effort was unnecessary, just because Disney decided to hide the tech from the world.

Green screen is obsolete... and so is this (way to hardware depended, way to complicated, try to light a marvel set with sodium lights). The future is The Volume

@@michaelkupfer3723 yes, The Volume is the future if your dad was Bill Gates or Bezos. Studios can barely pay their expenses, let alone invest in super expensive tech It's also very limited, because of the space restriction, Not to mention it's hard to use a flashy practical VFX like explosion or car crash with the volume While Green screen and sodium, you can do a large scale VFX and practical VFX, You can put it everywhere including outdoor, like vfx that require you to jump from building to building It's more versatile, you're not limited to just doing a static dialogue with minimal action cause you don't want to break the illusion from the Volume

​@@michaelkupfer3723 If the volume is all software how do I set it up in my basement

@@jensenraylight8011 Yes, that's why you rent it. Just like productions rent cameras, lights, rigs, dollys, guns etc etc

Splitting a lot of beans were they? Maybe a few Black-Eyed- Peas?

Back when Disney actually Fing innovated... They innovated!

@@KlaaismDisney didn’t even develop it, so there’s that and what do you mean they are the ones pushing volumetrics forward…Don’t get me wrong Disney is and has been a horrible company but they’ll keep innovating or pushing others innovations to make that sweet profit. Generally innovation in any industry is just finding new ways to reduce labor and costs of labor unfortunately.

@@scoobertmcruppert2915 Unfortunately? This is literally the same mechanism why 95% of society doesn't work in agriculture anymore and has more interesting and less health impactful things to do.

Dolbe or dobe lord of jank.

My brain froze for a second when I recognized him! Apart from that the optical setup doesn't feel special if you're versed into hyperspectral imaging 😅

I was like "Wait, THAT Paul Debevec? No wonder he's doing more optical wizardry"

That’s probably what Walt’s up to these days.

@@jfolmar2004 Walt hid them in secret. He died normally, but he was forced into cryo until we have the tech to retrieve this memory from him.

Horde your lostech before Comstar finds it

@@computernoise2209 He died from lung cancer and was cremated two days after death. I assume you are joking but sadly i can't be sure because people are so gullible nowadays, they will believe anything.

mmmyyyy pprreecciioouuussss!! 😆

I'm just trying to stick didn't try other methods to recreate in the meantime. It just seems green/blue screen somehow became too powerful. Yet, they always knew there was a better easier method.

What's more likely to happen is what they mentioned at the end of the video. This technology can be used to produce top-quality examples of complex masking situations, which you then use to train an AI. The future is AI masking.

I have to imagine there's a little more tweaking than they're letting on, you can definitely see light spill in their BTS footage. 7:22 shows their sodium footage and his face is clearly illuminated by it as well as part of his arm. So either he's slightly see through in the footage, or they'd need to do a bit more tweaking to make sure he stays solid. Would probably still be far less work than regular chroma key though.

Dude, find a shrink!

@@GrandHighGamer This was also the first time it's been done in decades. There aren't books full of tricks about getting this right. This is technically the first time anything has ever been filmed using this process (since it differs from the original in several important ways, most importantly the prism being swapped for a filter, and the two cameras). The fact that they got this good of a result first try, even if you can nitpick a few moments (that I honestly didn't notice), is pretty amazing.

And the technology was 50 years old.

@@GrandHighGamer when they converted the orange shot into a transparency mask, they probably just adjusted the gain/curves so the reflected light on oblique angles got crushed to black. I wish they would have shot some more specular/shiny objects, though even that shiny water bottle looked pretty great

his light stage research is truly amazing

As used in the The Invisible Man.

I’m sure there was a lot that needed to be fabricated. If the two digital cameras aren’t perfectly in sync, the footage would never line up. And especially with cameras with rolling shutter, they would need to be scanning perfectly simultaneously. So probably not just “anybody” can do this. That being said, I think that they proved that the technique is feasible with modern technology and digital cameras. It sounds like they originally did this with existing synchronized film camera technology. I think one of the key advantages of modern chroma key is that everything is done with a single camera. So despite its limitations, except for the software, no specialized equipment is necessary.

@@thebigitchy This is fairly simple to do on the hardware level. Film makers often create their own technology and there are small companies that do such projects. Within a year there will be a ready to use product. It's easier than you think. With 3D printers, microcontrollers and whole DIY market it is fairly simple to prototype and develop such tech. However like Paul said in the video. This will be mostly useful to train AI. Within few years there will AI solution that will be capable of perfectly removing background from any object.

@@thebigitchysyncing digital cameras is easy, the professional ones all have a connector for just that.

It was a nice history lesson. But green screen is way easier, less hardware dependent (try to light a Marvel set with sodium lights) and too complicated. And it still doesn't light the actors correctly. The future is called the Volume

@@michaelkupfer3723 He addresses that

@@michaelkupfer3723 yeah the lighting was off and is probably painful to get right on set, but these are techniques that can be rediscovered and refined. Ideally, you would use multiple channels, not just sodium.

​@@michaelkupfer3723 True, green screen is easier and *usually* good enough. It's a great tool. But sometimes it's *not* good enough and for those times something like this is useful.

lol what? Sailing ships are not better. They are different, but they are absolutely inferior for many things.

​@@thepapschmearmdThats not what theyre talking about. Suggest googling this cause its a cool topic, but in TL;DR Modern tankers and cargo ships have been utilizing giant modern sails to effectively eliminate fuel consumption while travelling with the wind, thus saving a TON of money and resources.

@@lastwymsi OP said "we had it right the first time" as if we're going back to something - yet these sails aren't in any way, shape, or form traditional sails, they're airfoils, and they aren't used in any traditional way. They have more in common with a modern race boat than they do with anything that ever strung up cloth. Really wish we could stop making these false equivalencies just because we're putting the words "ship" and "sail" in the same sentence again. This stuff doesn't have anything to do with the age of sail. Also, sail boats never stopped existing, so I don't know what this "rediscovery" idea is that people have(OK, I do, it's so we can make dumb memes about "lol the boat engineers just discovered the wind again lolol" by misrepresenting what this is entirely).

@@RyTrapp0 no, people were literally talking about putting cloth sails on cargo ships again to reduce emissions. and no one is saying that sailboats dont exist anymore, its more like "huge transport ships are going back toward the path of sails again"

@@Crazyclay78YT Feel free to post the name of the concept or organization behind it

Now the only other thing we need is to bring back the CGI quality that existed in the original Jurassic Park trilogy. Instead of the crap that most studios uses nowadays.

This is the first step. We now have cheap LED technology that is really good at producing monochromatic light that can be filtered out/in by that technique.

​@@txorimorea3869 True.

@@tovarishcheleonora8542 Well, theres alot of good CGI nowadays, the good one you don't notice. Tough the Original Jurassic Park did use mostly practical VFX, didn't they?

I think this could be extremely difficult for larger scale shots