Latest generation Honda CR-V does not offer the old 2.4L engine. (Maybe in other countries?) Also, I wouldn't get the 1.5L since they have a horrible reputation for fuel dilution of the motor oil. Technically that can be a bad problem, reducing longevity and durability over time. The 2.0L (non-turbo) Hybrid is the one to get in newer CR-V's.

Bad video!!!! Bad choice!! You didn't mention the high risk of the head-gasket blowing on the 1.5L-Turbo!!! So the video is just click-bait and fluff.

In fact, no. The best engine in all parameters by a wide margin is the hybrid. It's significantly thriftier, more powerful, and much more refined. The only reason to buy the turbo is price. The fact is in a few years the hybrid pays for itself, thus there is absolutely no reason to buy the turbo, none. The only reason to offer the turbo is for the buyer to have a lowest price product. Ideally Honda should simply discontinue the turbo, having only one engine should hopefully save enough in the manufacture to make the hybrid even more affordable.

These are the three engines choice offer by Honda for the CR-V. We wanted to know which is the best but you cannot recomend which is the best Honda CR-V Engine, pick one? Me, I'll take the Hybrid 2.0 Motor. The 2.4L lack low end torque and the 1.5L Turbo have excessive oil dilution if you do lot of short trips.

Best Honda engine? You mean the one with oil dilution that cokes up its inlet valves with carbon?

All their motors ae underpowered!