This Is Why No Vegan Plays Chess

No video

This Is Why No Vegan Plays Chess

Рет қаралды 34,616

Күн бұрын

Subscribe for more funny chess content, and join my Discord server at:
/ discord
🎵 Music used in this video:
Xomu - Last Dance:
• Xomu - Last Dance
#chess #ChessBut

Пікірлер: 214

@delpheus7658 5 ай бұрын

Failed the challenge when you retreated the bishop. Not aggressive.

@DraygoKorvan 5 ай бұрын

I think he made up for it by making the knight rule much harder.

@delpheus7658 5 ай бұрын

@@DraygoKorvan it's always annoying though when he disregards the challenge and rewrites his own.

@elishedaberg1274 5 ай бұрын

But doing that was aggresive towards us cause he knew the play would make us mad

@SorakaOTP462 5 ай бұрын

@@delpheus7658 he doesn't care, for all I know he could be making these videos with someone he knows. I mean he's a youtuber and he makes a living out of this.

@the_SolLoser 5 ай бұрын

It was an aggressive retreat. 😂

@C-92 5 ай бұрын

1:42 Retreating the bishop? What a coward (and not aggressive)

@mauer1 5 ай бұрын

It's fine considering he overshoot on the harming the horses rule.

@3snoW_ 5 ай бұрын

@@mauer1 Yeah, I liked the way simp interpreted the challenge.

@sandalkumelayang 5 ай бұрын

@@mauer1but he can takes the pawn, sacrificing it for aggressive purpose

@the_SolLoser 5 ай бұрын

It was an aggressive retreat. 😏

@Smol_PC 5 ай бұрын

If the knight captured the pawn, he would've been attacking the knight with the bishop.

@kalcheus 5 ай бұрын

"Based on how this guy is playing, I don't think he's just going to plainly blunder a piece" ... he literally blundered the Queen on move 3, and two moves after Simp said this he blundered the Rook.

@TheShanks1337 5 ай бұрын

And still he plays way better than 90% of the 100 rateds we have seen on this channel

@justinbombach9873 5 ай бұрын

Blundering the rook was probably a mouse-slip since he moved it a second square on the next turn. Also, he noticed the discovered attack on his rook on the next turn, so I think Simp was right, the opponent was smarter than most 100 rated players. The queen, though, was a blunder, no doubt.

@rraimundobruno 5 ай бұрын

Crazy how a couple of moves in he forgets that he should be playing aggressively. That said, the opponent also forgot they were playing a "You can only advance one square each move" so they both lost

@grzegorzmj4881 5 ай бұрын

But it's pretty much impossible to play aggressively without allowing any horsey to be attacked a single time.

@the_SolLoser 5 ай бұрын

It was an aggressive retreat 😏

@LeviATallaksen 5 ай бұрын

2...Qf6 wasn't one square, but I get your point

@MrJed87 5 ай бұрын

@rzmj4881 But not impossible to play aggressively without -taking- the horses, which was clearly the more sane interpretation of the rules. Honestly, I think sometimes he retroactively makes the challenge harder after he has played the game, to make it end in the range of ~4 minutes.

@G-Forces 5 ай бұрын

Simp: "right?" Me: *checks remaining time on video

@joda7697 5 ай бұрын

yup, every time

@Roberto-nn6kb 5 ай бұрын

rel

@shikagohan 5 ай бұрын

No actual horses were harme during the making of the video

@drachefly 5 ай бұрын

Not even emotionally

@Modie 5 ай бұрын

I mean, the horsie knows it is protected by a pawn, so it can rest easily, even if attacked by a queen, because it knows, no one will take a horsie if they lose a queen for it. Horses are smart after all.

@adisca2k 5 ай бұрын

Except that 100 rated players would sack a queen for a horse.

@whosilence 5 ай бұрын

Don't underestimate the horseys people

@satgurs 5 ай бұрын

@@adisca2khorses are more dangerous than queens at 100 elo

@zacharygrouwinkel1534 5 ай бұрын

“Based on how this guy is playing, he’s not going to plainly blunder a piece” Simp forgetting move 3 when he plainly blundered the queen.

@LukeSeed 5 ай бұрын

A vegan WOULD think that moving their horsey into an attacked position as you causing emotional damage

@mitchmarq428 5 ай бұрын

"that vegan teacher" is a specific person on the internet. she reacts to pretty much anything involving food and goes after celebrities who eat meat, in a very patronizing and tone deaf way.

@sourabhanand7721 5 ай бұрын

He totally forgot the aggressive part 〽️

@wombat4191 5 ай бұрын

While adding unnecessary horse rules to make the challenge all but impossible.

@zpellet6326 5 ай бұрын

Is that a McDonalds emoji?

@lerarosalene 5 ай бұрын

@@zpellet6326 it's "Part alternation mark" for some reason.

@the_SolLoser 5 ай бұрын

A vegan who endangers a horsey is a "Fegan" or "fake vegan." Just like any "milk" that doesn't come from a mammal isn't actually milk.

@Kalaphant 5 ай бұрын

Deleting a rule to amplify the other is doing it very differently tho lol@@wombat4191

@theendofthestart8179 5 ай бұрын

Vegans are fine, but “That Vegan Teacher” is a content creator who goes out of her to be a horrible person

@wilh3lmmusic 5 ай бұрын

If he endangers his own horse then you should just move your piece away to no longer be attacking it

@kirito5547 5 ай бұрын

Yeah opponent is one of those people who eat 🍗 on the face of a vegan protestor.

@the_SolLoser 5 ай бұрын

@@kirito5547based

@arifezwan8893 5 ай бұрын

Reasons I vibe with the music: 1. The music is very good 2. It makes all surprises that are to come, 10x more surprising

@Bladster94 5 ай бұрын

"We know this guy won't carelessly blunder a piece just to end my video" You mean the guy who blundered his queen on turn 3?

@jacobhancock-hernandez4962 5 ай бұрын

It was actually very vegan of you to expect others to follow the rules of being a vegan.

@Knuckles2761 5 ай бұрын

In some parts of the world bishops are called elephants.

@magentamonster 5 ай бұрын

There's also rooks. The name "rook" for the chess piece that moves orthogonally and the crow species Corvus frugilegus are etymologically unrelated though. And the rook called an elephant in chaturaji. The alfil is called an elephant in other chess variants. In fact, "alfil" means "elephant". Apparently the bishop evolved from the alfil, hence it's no coincidence that they are both called "elephant".

@asellusaustralis261 5 ай бұрын

Isn't moving horses a form of exploitation? This wasn't a voluntary motion, was it?

@atoucangirl 5 ай бұрын

the rider asks for permission

@asellusaustralis261 5 ай бұрын

@@atoucangirl whoa-whoa, rider means harness, harness means exploitation and harm

@atoucangirl 5 ай бұрын

@@asellusaustralis261 nah, you ride the horse harness-less the old fashionned way

@srn347 5 ай бұрын

Threatening a horse could only cause emotional damage if the horse sees the threat, and it'd only ever see the threat if the attacker is another horse.

@NumenEloha 5 ай бұрын

But if the horse is defended there's not emotional damage, he has emotional support from its comrades. So is only damage if the horse isn't defended.

@catpoisonlover 5 ай бұрын

You wouldn't want a gun pointed at you even if you got the homies with you

@gaming_beast2066 5 ай бұрын

missed opportunity to use the 'Emotional damage' meme.

@Capzielath64 5 ай бұрын

EMOTIONAL DAMAGE!

@upgradeplans777 5 ай бұрын

As an actual vegan: - Making a horse do work for you is exploitation, a vegan would never do that. - If your opponent is non-vegan, then the video wouldn't end on any of their moves. Because forcing the other player is not "practicable", which is part of the common vegan definition. With that, the video should have ended 1 move earlier.

@jamster251 5 ай бұрын

:D another banger That editing though 👌

@Ekh519haj 5 ай бұрын

famous last words at the end there xD

@Slothptimal 5 ай бұрын

Chess used Perish Song: any piece that engages in combat has to die within 3 turns.

@Pr0t4t0 5 ай бұрын

1:42 is the least aggressive move I’ve seen in my life.

@TheGenderAnarchist 5 ай бұрын

Love the content

@Alresu 5 ай бұрын

Knew it as soon as the monolouge started.^^

@MaulLerGamer 5 ай бұрын

what a perfectly cut end XD got me gud XD

@since1876 5 ай бұрын

This man always makes the challenges needlessly impossible

@SoujiOkitaTwo 3 ай бұрын

Btw the challenge didn’t mean no attacking horses the challenge meant no taking horses. Also the challenge doesn’t apply to your horses.

@benjaminoechsli1941 5 ай бұрын

I like how Simp edits messages into the buttons on the left. Sadly, I'm sure there are vegans out there that dearly wish their obligate carnivores could be vegan as well.

@protime573 5 ай бұрын

was expecting horsie d5 to end it but that works also

@in1 5 ай бұрын

tbh that was one of the least agressive games I've seen

@zeik101 5 ай бұрын

Y’know, I was definitely one of those attacking isn’t harming people, but ngl, that reasoning was super valid lmao

@lonelyPorterCH 5 ай бұрын

I'm totally on the side attacking != harming^^

@PauxloE 5 ай бұрын

I'd say if the horse moves where some other piece or pawn sees it (but doesn't move to capture), that's not even emotional harm, only if someone moves to threaten it.

@puregero 5 ай бұрын

Noooo, not my cat, anyone but my fish loving cat

@rubiksmath7938 4 ай бұрын

The knight part alone is nearly impossible - seriously I challenge anyone to checkmate 100 rated with this rules in a nontrivial manner

@petersmythe6462 5 ай бұрын

Bishop C1: not very aggressive

@onerevenant1211 5 ай бұрын

I already miss the iconic "what the f-"

@pafnutiytheartist 5 ай бұрын

1:40 mission failed

@cathsaigh2197 5 ай бұрын

I wouldn't count a knight moving into danger as it being harmed, at most count attacks where a piece is moved to attack a knight.

@kianseibel2236 5 ай бұрын

Amazing challenge :D

@yurithorngage2163 5 ай бұрын

10/10 content. Everytime i think we're run out of ideas you come back in with another banger. Hell, im actually learning more about how to play chess early games like this lol

@Psycho250785 5 ай бұрын

Well, if you’re 100-rated, then yes, you can learn a lot… :D

@SirKappy 5 ай бұрын

Emotional damage!

@nyseoul 5 ай бұрын

EMOTIONAL DAMAGE

@Zulk_RS 5 ай бұрын

Did Simp just post 2 videos on the same day? This is a good day!

@glorytoturkiye3146 5 ай бұрын

This challange would be harder in Turkish cuz in Turkish bishops are called "fil", that means "elephant" in english.

@fabriziomariano1332 5 ай бұрын

Jokes on you, Chess Simp! I don't have a cat for it to be vegan

@TS6815 5 ай бұрын

ANTI SPOILER BARRIER

@SuperZebezian 5 ай бұрын

Thank you. Don’t let the neckbeards who will lob accusations at you drag you down.

@anzyroadside2374 5 ай бұрын

Pushed the like button to keep the barrier up.

@pandryf3978 5 ай бұрын

4:24 everyone saw that coming

@LilacShowers 5 ай бұрын

ngl this has gotta be one of the most infuriating challenge interpretations so far like how did you both completely ignore half the challenge (this was one of the least aggressive games you've ever played) AND make the other half pretty much impossible for no reason

@john-paulgies4313 2 ай бұрын

A rook is a type of bird. The challenge should have acknowledged them as animals, too.

@anzyroadside2374 5 ай бұрын

That was massive damage to your video.

@user-tc3zz6ts5i 5 ай бұрын

Bro you can attack the horses you just can't harm them

@pt3ren 5 ай бұрын

this one was a lot of fun :D

@DukeBG 5 ай бұрын

Challenge description was loose, but this was still a wrong interpretation

@FrancoisTremblay 5 ай бұрын

Not crazy enough for That Vegan Teacher. It should also have him rant against the opposing player for not being vegan enough.

@epicdaniel508 5 ай бұрын

The title is wrong. I played chess.

@kaliberaziel5190 5 ай бұрын

so u are no longer vegan. sorry

@epicdaniel508 5 ай бұрын

@@kaliberaziel5190 wow

@joeyready3 Ай бұрын

The vegan teacher in not a nice vegan, she attacks anyone who isn't vegan.

@geeta172 5 ай бұрын

In India, this challenge would’ve gone really differently. Although the rules remain the same, we refer to the bishops as camels and rooks as elephants!

@GeorgeDCowley 5 ай бұрын

4:10 Bishop takes.

@n0vitski 5 ай бұрын

Rook is technically a type of bird and another name for bishop is the elephant. Real vegan playthrough would be an absolutely impossible challenge.

@adashofbitter 5 ай бұрын

1:46 - retreating Bishop… Very unagressive

@nilsonrobertoabadias5244 5 ай бұрын

I'm a vegetarian and have many vegan friends and we do play chess, but it has to be a wooden board and pieces (and pawns) in respect to the life of turtles in the future (not really lmao). Also why do people refer to vegans as violent? In my experience vegans rarely pick a quarrel, it's always someone in a guilt-trip denial like "but muh meat I can't live with no meat let me kill and dismember them pigs" and I mean, anyone who holds sacred any principle will get annoyed if you blatantly attack their beliefs, it's like coming to a priest and being like "dumbass you can't like prove god so you're so wrong and full of shit I will keep sinful and profanate your grave" and expect them to like you.

@lerarosalene 5 ай бұрын

Yup. I've interacted with aggressive vegans in my life, but can't deny that there is way more aggression coming other way around.

@mattevans4377 5 ай бұрын

You know how people know someone is vegan? It's because the vegans always mention it. Every. Single. Time. ;)

@kemosonicfan123lbp 5 ай бұрын

@@mattevans4377 I've only had vegans tell me they were so once the topic of going out for food or favorite foods comes up

@sadanyagci 5 ай бұрын

@@mattevans4377 Interesting that this is how people know someone is literally anything else personal too. Also, you don't know if someone is vegan if they don't mention it. So the ones that mention it confirm your bias and the ones that don't mention it you assume are meat eaters. It's a bias.

@lerarosalene 5 ай бұрын

@@mattevans4377 you see, that's what I talking about. People joining random conversations to scold vegans are way more common than vice versa.

@AxoCooki 5 ай бұрын

The Bishop piece in Arabic is The Elephant, you should redo this but include the elephants

@takahashi2852 5 ай бұрын

The way I interpreted this is to be as aggressive as possible, capturing whenever the opportunity presents itself but never capturing the opponents horse, threatening the horse is allowed Whether or not the horse's rule includes yours is up for debate He explicitly said not to harm the horses where harm means capturing, not "attacking" Its odd to me that having a piece within the reach of one of your pieces is called attacking when in reality at most you're only threatening to attack

@tcxd1164 5 ай бұрын

The chess term "attack" is used in contrast to "defend", where you try to prevent a piece from being captured, so honestly I think it's fine. The rest I'd agree with.

@Mag_ladroth 5 ай бұрын

What's the music in the background

@yahya_amoudi 5 ай бұрын

check the description

@0744401 3 ай бұрын

It's hate for "that vegan teacher" specifically.

@Kirokill1 5 ай бұрын

Good video

@Kinetochore-ti5hk 5 ай бұрын

Dang, a failed challenge and no "what the f-"? What a rip-off.

@whosilence 5 ай бұрын

if Simp had moved 14. h4 clearing a square for the knight I bet opponent would have put it there, allowing for the checkmate

@felixwilfing2472 5 ай бұрын

has really no one noticed The hidden messege about vegan cats?

@AshkarBehek0 5 ай бұрын

2:52 Simp being scared of a Knight moving in the Queen's way ending the video made me wonder what would happen if the Vegan teacher was handed a gun by a literal dog, which then begs her to shot him dead.

@Kalaphant 5 ай бұрын

1:57 You don't have to take them tho lol edit: OH! That's what you meant by "Attack == Emotional Harm"

@Robeebert 5 ай бұрын

Challenge failed

@jakl 5 ай бұрын

E MOTIONAL DAMAGE

@David-gj9qr 5 ай бұрын

The comment said "you" so he's not going to find a way to apply this to his opponent...right?

@Siniset 5 ай бұрын

I think you were too harsh in interpreting the rules here. What I think you should have done: 1. You can't threaten opponent's knight 2. If your knight is threatened, you must make sure it is not captured on opponent's next turn. 3. If opponent makes the knight vulnerable, you must move so it isn't vulnerable on the next move. 4. If you can't do anything, the video ends. In this case, you would have had Bxf5, Na3, Nd2 or Qc3 available.

@AlejoGoVegan 5 ай бұрын

I approve this video.

@TheInselaffen 5 ай бұрын

Horses are very skittish.

@anandareiter1127 5 ай бұрын

I like how simp just forgot about being very aggressive halfway through the video. Fits vegan better anyways

@sammydavis5628 5 ай бұрын

Bc1 didn't look very aggressive to me.

@nguyenhoaianh1797 5 ай бұрын

Can you play drawback chess?

@NoomStuff 5 ай бұрын

Video 86 of asking simp to play fps chess

@Kalaphant 5 ай бұрын

0:45 Humans are animals lol

@Draedaja 5 ай бұрын

Hate for vegans? No. Hate for THAT vegan teacher? Absolutely, yes.

@sgas 5 ай бұрын

The hate for vegans is ditferent. Look into who the vegan teacher actually is.

@cyborg98 5 ай бұрын

Why Queen to b3 instead of a4? a4 was a checkmate in 1, wasn't it?

@FoxSlyme 5 ай бұрын

How is that a checkmate if that's not even a check?

@sadanyagci 5 ай бұрын

Queen to a4 followed by queen to e8 would be a check, and is protected by the bishop, but the horse on f6 would take the queen. I'm not sure how vegan feeding your queen to your opponent's horse is. But it's definitely not checkmate.

@therecruitking1623 5 ай бұрын

Subscribe or your cat is a vegan

@snomcultist189 5 ай бұрын

It is obvious that he means take, not see.

@stealthbeastgaming 5 ай бұрын

While attacking a piece may be emotionally harmful, I think the rules should've specified only if YOU start the attack. If the horse itself places itself under attack, you haven't really violated your vegan code (provided you do everything in your power to stop that attack thereafter). Vegans don't just give up on their ideology if they accidentally run over a deer, let alone simply have one momentarily in front of the car which they had to avoid. The trajectory of your game was clearly victorious, therefore, an honorary *mission accomplished*

@waldolemmer 5 ай бұрын

Simp is a vegan confirmed

@teambellavsteamalice 3 ай бұрын

I don't like the interpretation with the convoluted emotional harm, but I guess otherwise it would have been too easy...

@FoxSlyme 5 ай бұрын

why the hell are all anti-spoiler barriers are at the very bottom of the comment section

@user-ge5lr3lk7w 5 ай бұрын

Who else noticed a secret message?

@goblinkoma 5 ай бұрын

a vegan cat? that doesn't make sense at all!

@yahya_amoudi 5 ай бұрын

your cat isn`t a vegan if you`re subscribed

@aaronwentzel8695 5 ай бұрын

Whew, good thing my cat is not a vegan!

@lurkingfell 5 ай бұрын

Bishops=Camels & Rooks=elephants… Don’t harm them too in Vegan 2.0 challenge Edit: This is your punishment for adding your own twists to the challenge 😂