Calm your tits. I just checked and it's still $190.
@CY3ER2 ай бұрын
Wow... yeah, almost twice the price now. $358.
@remiremillard8419Ай бұрын
@@CY3ER am I crazy because I just looked it up and it still on Amazon for $200
@CY3ERАй бұрын
@@remiremillard8419looks like the price has dropped. I checked their website when I originally posted. It's back down to the $190 price point.
@raenaraena4 ай бұрын
Just had to stop by to compliment your Democracy Manifest shirt. May your meals always be succulent
@hugohugo9904 ай бұрын
Can’t beat a succulent, Chinese meal.
@raenaraena4 ай бұрын
@@hugohugo990 I see you know your judo well.
@Gulliolm4 ай бұрын
GET YOUR HANDS OF MY PENIS!
@davidhemsworth40983 ай бұрын
GET YOUR HAND OFF MY APERTURE RING
@ezekielkokspeaks4 ай бұрын
Brightin star is really good! I love the 28mm 2.8 on my m9
@TomCalton4 ай бұрын
They're amazing quality for the price.
@ukeme24 ай бұрын
@@TomCaltonis this compatible with Canon Mark 4? 😊
@nickeh3204 ай бұрын
Toneh will now love this
@rephaelreyes85524 ай бұрын
I audibly exhaled from that joke. I'm not even sure if tony has ever mentioned camera conspiracy in the past lol
@MohondhaY4 ай бұрын
That's a lot of TONEH!
@carrioncrow81914 ай бұрын
@@rephaelreyes8552what’s camera conspiracy?
@nickeh3204 ай бұрын
@@rephaelreyes8552 but they commented on one of his videos
@rephaelreyes85524 ай бұрын
@@carrioncrow8191 it’s the KZfaq channel that made up the term “Toneh” due to Tony’s obsession with the bokeh blur
@anthonybenda4329Ай бұрын
I’ve had one the last year and LOVED it. Still my go-to for quick outings with my little ZV-E10
@chrisogrady282 ай бұрын
BTW you can get full frame 50mm f/1.4, which is a larger aperture than this 0.95 APS-C lens, that are sharper, and have autofocus, for similar money used
@wjlafrance2 ай бұрын
Yep, if you have a full frame camera more options are open to you. APSC shooters have to resort to sub-1 apertures to get the DoF achievable with a full frame camera at f/1.2. These f/0.95 lenses only work on crop sensor cameras anyhow, so they’re basically irrelevant to full frame shooters.
@OzExpeditionsАй бұрын
Any recs?
@wjlafranceАй бұрын
@@OzExpeditionsWhat camera system are you using? The Canon EF 50/1.4 can be had on eBay for under $200, or if you’re willing to give up autofocus a Minolta Rokkor 50/1.4 goes for $80.
@OzExpeditionsАй бұрын
@@wjlafrance I have a Sony A7iv
@wjlafranceАй бұрын
@@OzExpeditions Nice, with a mirrorless you can adapt almost any DSLR / SLR lens without corrective optics. I’d look for a Minolta MD to Sony adapter and try out that Minolta lens. With focus peaking in camera manually focusing should be a breeze also.
@RwdphotosАй бұрын
Good enough for instagram
@michall63762 ай бұрын
You said the lens is sharp wide open while showing a washed out photo. Is this an undisclosed ad?
@FalloutUrMum2 ай бұрын
It's sharp for f/0.95 and I honestly thought the photo looked plenty sharp. Also, the fact that it's THAT good at f/0.95, it's really really sharp at f/2 and gets better until f/4. Then stays pretty solid until f/8 I'd say. This is as sharp at f/0.95 as most high end lenses are at f/2.8
@Poon13122 ай бұрын
Obviously it is
@CalgothitsАй бұрын
@@michall6376 it was sharp for what it is, even the leica 0.95 lens isn’t sharp wide open and cost 30x the cost of this lol
@c4veman19 күн бұрын
did we look at the same photo? i bought this lens 5 months back and it replaced my 750$ sigma.
@LeoMkII3 ай бұрын
And it's probably great for low light video, I have a sigma 1.4 and that's already pretty awesome for low light
@NatRenaissance3 ай бұрын
It is, except for the manual focus.
@anthonyreid72212 ай бұрын
I have the 16mm 1.4, 30mm 1.4 and this 35mm f0.95. It doesn't replace the auto focus on my sigma but is definitely better at creating a shallow depth of field
@FalloutUrMum2 ай бұрын
I love it, but has no internal stabilization. So make sure you have steady hands, a tripod, or a camera that has it's own ibis. People complain about the manual focus, but I've pulled my own focus on a lot of projects. You just have to learn to do it
@kingghidorah81066 күн бұрын
i was once shooting around with my retro Minolta GM 80-200 in a very small village when i met a guy with a Fujifilm and this exact lens. Beautiful camera and lens!
@FalloutUrMum2 ай бұрын
I have one, I didn't think I'd like it as much as I do. It's the only prime I have and I basically take it out when it gets too dark for my other lenses while I'm out hiking. Then I'll sometimes just use it if I left it on from the last time.
@anthonyreid72212 ай бұрын
I have this lens in m43 mount and it's amazing. Not something i use 24'7 but the bokeh and background separation is noticeably stronger than the 30mm 1.4 i usually keep on the camera.
@willem2099Ай бұрын
M42? Or what is M43?
@mazairaАй бұрын
M43 is micro four thirds or MFT
@guillermoquinteros72014 ай бұрын
I doubt I’ll get a reply, but would you recommend using this lens for video? Like for example, maybe shooting an interview and your subject isn’t moving so there’s no need for auto focus? Or is this mainly just for photography?
@TomCalton4 ай бұрын
There's certainly nothing stopping you from using it for video - just make sure your focus pulling skills are on point.
@LeonGale064 ай бұрын
One thing I’d point out is that the focus throw isn’t very long so manually focusing for video would be challenging as there is a bigger gap for missing focus
@EmyrDerfelАй бұрын
This might be good for maker channels, capturing some close up turning or milling of metal.
@pavanlavuri4 ай бұрын
Love from India ❤
@TomCalton4 ай бұрын
💖
@drbeardo69604 ай бұрын
This will perform almost like a 56mm F1.4 lens on Fullframe Canon body
@chrisogrady282 ай бұрын
This is not a 1.6x crop lens, only canon uses those tiny sensors. This is a standard APS-C lens so it's equiv to a 52mm f/1.4
@leonardorafaelvideos80202 ай бұрын
You said you mounted it to a Fujifilm. Is it compatible? Or is an adaptor needed?
@samwang583114 күн бұрын
The price is the best part
@rockartistetАй бұрын
Full frame??
@4mooncheese4 ай бұрын
Very nice. I think I need one for my X-Pro 2.
@FilmyWyobraźniGrzegorzŚwierk20 күн бұрын
Why night example not included 🙁
@tomyasch224 ай бұрын
I have this lens for my a6700. While it's capable of producing great images, the fact that it's manual focus makes it unusable when shooting birds for example. Right now I'm thinking of selling this lens and buying the Viltrox 27mm F1.2, which is way better in every aspect.
@kaelanm-s39194 ай бұрын
A 35mm for shooting birds? Are birds usually right next to you?? Lol
@mw00624 ай бұрын
0.95 for birds?
@samipso4 ай бұрын
27 for birds :o
@tejdhillon21334 ай бұрын
a6700 for birds :o
@RAOqwerty4 ай бұрын
Birds? :o
@kurteisenlohr4 ай бұрын
Mitakon 35mm 0.95mm is good as well.
@JustSomeInternetDude4 ай бұрын
Yes the Mitakon Speedmaster is awesome.
@themutekiununbi49323 ай бұрын
Thank you. I missed that
@jpdj27154 ай бұрын
What is its T-value at f/0.95? For reference, DxO Mark measured a 1.2L lens as having a T-value of 1.5 thus making it as fast as a 1.4G lens from another brand that also has a T-value of 1.5.
@tiborbogi74574 ай бұрын
Agree, 1.5 x 0.95 = 1.425 on FF not that impressive, but nice to have on APSC camera.
@kendokaaa3 ай бұрын
@@tiborbogi7457F stops do not change between sensor sizes when it comes to brightness of the image. Only depth of field
@FalloutUrMum2 ай бұрын
@@tiborbogi7457 The amount of light let in doesn't change. Low F stops on full frame and on crop sensor have the same amount of light let in, it's depth of field that changes when you convert to equivalent focal lengths. F1 at 35mm will have the depth of field of F1 on 35mm regardless of full frame or crop sensor, you just have to adjust to get the equivalent depth of 50mm if you're trying to recreate the look. It's not as big of a deal as people on KZfaq make it out to be.
@tiborbogi74572 ай бұрын
@@FalloutUrMum You are right. For me possibilities with depth of field are interesting. Shame, that is no canon version of these lens.
@RwdphotosАй бұрын
Having a large value difference likely means a lot of vignetting, but shouldn’t make a big difference in exposure. Unless you’re shooting a movie in 35mm film, you shouldn’t have to worry about t-stop values to match exposures.
@cedrics1220Ай бұрын
Any 0.95 lenses for fullframe that are in this price range?
@GuidoBicocca4 ай бұрын
Which lens is?
@richardlansing3 ай бұрын
And that question is exactly why you shouldn't buy it.
@samiparlayan47583 ай бұрын
@@richardlansingis it satire or a real question😅😅
@NVAfilmАй бұрын
What is the name of this lens?
@jiffy7Ай бұрын
literally says it in the first few seconds of the video
@STONJAUS_FILMS4 ай бұрын
Are all 0.9 lenses apsc?
@TomCalton4 ай бұрын
Nope, some are full frame. In fact I have a full frame one coming in for review very soon 👀
@bbpreelinsight4 ай бұрын
So informative!
@trndx25704 ай бұрын
It's a APS-C 😢
@ralfjansen91184 ай бұрын
Adult (full fame) cameras genuinely have a shallower dof, using equivalent lenses of f/1.4 would give comparable results. A 50 mm f/1.4 has been the standard lens for many decades, is, of course, more expensive than this cheap Chinese one. Nowadays, a 1.2 gives even more toneh on FF, at premium prices.
@trndx25704 ай бұрын
@@ralfjansen9118 thanks for your comment 👍🏻
@FalloutUrMum2 ай бұрын
@@ralfjansen9118 the amount of light let in is the appeal of this lens. It's more so made for low light than it's made for spectacular bokeh, it's just a bonus
@ralfjansen91182 ай бұрын
@@FalloutUrMum That's the obvious elephant in the room. But this was important back in the film days when ISO 400 was the best you could get (and still had to compromise in grain), not today when you could crank up ISO to 5 digit numbers with usable results with modern cameras. The difference of just one stop (effective f/1.0 vs f/1.4) is no longer relevant in comparison to the gain of, for example, 5 stops (400 vs 12800 ISO). You are totally free now in your (dof) composition.
@carmencosmoСағат бұрын
Does something like this exist for mft ?
@mrhogan261211 күн бұрын
No EF-S / EF mount. Makes me sad 😅
@orilio33112 ай бұрын
f0.95 but only mentioned at the end that it's for a crop sensor...
@FalloutUrMum2 ай бұрын
They have a 50mm one for full frame. But full frame is icky, crop sensor ftw.
@roopraj11564 ай бұрын
what about ttartisans?
@jasmijnariel3 ай бұрын
Id love to see it shooting the galaxy
@okiemuteolayinka7820Ай бұрын
“That’s what she said”😂😂
@LeonardoMarra3 ай бұрын
Can I use it on a xt-5? Where to buy? Ty
@samiteshbhattacharjee9566Ай бұрын
Liked it
@user-fg1we6hu3d2 ай бұрын
Sure.
@premiumaccount15302 ай бұрын
Please suggest me a cheap/inexpensive macro lens for canon ef mount
@davidlacziko15164 ай бұрын
Can't open your links!!
@Rosla1783 ай бұрын
Flaring, ghosting, purple fringing and lens curvature. You can't have a cheap lens with without flaws.
@AmbercoolPhotography2 ай бұрын
Surprisingly it doesn’t come in M mount :(
@wjennekens2 ай бұрын
It's designed for APS-C not full frame
@The-KP4 ай бұрын
That lens renders a very soft and low contrast image. I'm not sure what value such a lens brings to the pro photog. It'll be a novelty to everyone else, of course. I have a Noct-Nikkor that sees occasional use for portraiture, but even then it's not very practical, as the subject must sit absolutely still, given the ambient lighting.
@0ecka3 ай бұрын
So, this 35F0.95 crop lens is like 55F1.5 on Full Frame. There's nothing unbeatable about it.
@gregorybeale3 ай бұрын
52.5
@0ecka3 ай бұрын
@@gregorybeale 53.62
@dhlehrenlos2 ай бұрын
well it is unbeatable on for apsc cameras no? or am I understanding something wrong here?
@0ecka2 ай бұрын
@@dhlehrenlos Well, the APS-C is expensive to begin with. It is easy to fool people with fancy F-stops on crop systems. But the pictures are not going to be unbeatable by modern standards. Perhaps it's a fine lens for a crop. There's just nothing unbeatable about it.
@PeterPrism25 күн бұрын
Original 35 F1.4 mark I x ever
@Arcsecant2 ай бұрын
$400 for Canada
@saviomenezes36434 ай бұрын
Where can I get this lens and what is its brand
@christophde77203 ай бұрын
Brightin star as you can see on the lens
@SMGJohn29 күн бұрын
Offf, thats very busy background in those bokeh shots, 7artisans are general the best F0.95 lenses imo.
@nathanielclifton16434 ай бұрын
Yes but besides the clicked aperture ring, how is it any different than the 7artisans 35 mm f 0.95?
@zaks74 ай бұрын
I have that one and I love it.
@nathanielclifton16434 ай бұрын
@@zaks7 same, That's why I'm wondering why this Brightin Star one is getting all sorts of praise but as far as I can tell it is optically the exact same as the 7artisans
@zaks74 ай бұрын
@@nathanielclifton1643 from what I can see it has slightly better optics and so somewhat sharper full open. Otherwise it’s practically a clone of the 7a.
@helios0074 ай бұрын
@@nathanielclifton1643 what i can tell is that the TTA is really really REALY soft when shooting wide open and close to minimal focus distance up until f4. Otherwise its as good as you expect from a lens this price range.
@nathanielclifton16434 ай бұрын
@@helios007 That's interesting because I haven't noticed this problem with the 7artisans
@Darhhaall3 ай бұрын
Does focus peaking work well with this camera? I would love to have something like this and I just bought Z50 that could use it, but regular manual focusing is out of the question for me thanks to my bad eyesight.
@anthonyreid72212 ай бұрын
Focus peaking works perfect with my brightinstar lens on my olympus m43 camera. I couldn't imagine using it without peaking. Would suck for sure.
@FalloutUrMum2 ай бұрын
I have this lens for a Canon M50. Focus peaking works great with this lens, but it all depends on the camera you put this lens on
@MustafaKemaldombisimAtaturk11 күн бұрын
Sharp at F8 😂😂😂
@Linked024 ай бұрын
Good for Fiji xt1?
@alexsawyer20603 ай бұрын
I have it on my X-T2 and I love it!
@huitebos19722 ай бұрын
35 mm for portret photography. No. 85 mm to 110mm is a portretphotografy. This lens will blowup your subject.
@willem2099Ай бұрын
Eummm ok but 85 to 110 will also strongly change someones face. If you dont want that you use 50mm, not 85 to 110.
@skorpoolr22 сағат бұрын
Are you talking about for full-frame or APS-C? Because for APS-C I’d agree, but for full frame, 35mm is much too wide, a 50 or 85 is much better for portrait on a FF.
@DavidRamgobin2 ай бұрын
Isn't this also a fixed-focus lens?
@FalloutUrMum2 ай бұрын
No, you can pull the focus, it's just manual focus
@lukakoprivica4 ай бұрын
APS-C!
@RRsalin2 ай бұрын
This lens has none of the qualities you need to create good images
@gegu9372 ай бұрын
CURSE MY BEAUTIFUL 1950’s ANALOG CAMERA. CANT PUT NO LENSES ON THAT BEAUTY!!!
@davepastern4 ай бұрын
not sure where you're getting this lens for USD $190...
@bluelake073 ай бұрын
It's $199 at Amazon USA
@davepastern3 ай бұрын
@@bluelake07 not much good to me...but thanks.
@Docdoolit3 ай бұрын
How is the bokeh when shooting video?
@davepastern4 ай бұрын
and it's also APS-C...so it's like basically a 56mm lens on Canon APS-C...
@JACKnJESUS4 ай бұрын
and the f stop equivalent is more like f/1.4
@davepastern4 ай бұрын
@@JACKnJESUS how so? the f stop doesn't change just cos you use a APS-C design...the f stop is the division of the aperture opening vs the focal length of said lens...
@JACKnJESUS4 ай бұрын
@@davepastern When talking about equivalence...we are talking about FF equivalence. The crop factor is applied to focal length (which you commented on accurately)...PLUS the aperture. It's not just focal length that is changed. ISO also changes...it's all three. ISO gets the crop factor squared...so for crop it is around 2.25. Meaning at FF iso 225 will be the equivalent of iso 100 on a crop camera. This is why smaller sensor cameras have the reputation of having more noise...it's all in the math.
@davepastern4 ай бұрын
@@JACKnJESUS ISO is just a measurement of amplification to the sensor signal, nothing more and nothing less...it doesn't change from camera to camera (if they adhere to ISO standards of course). What changes with APS-C is smaller sensels, meaning they have a smaller electron well. This is what leads to worse higher ISO performance, not the crop factor of the lens. Yes, the smaller imaging circle of the crop lens means less light hitting the sensor at any given f stop. Check out Fabian Fopp's video "Photography showdown: MFT and full format in real-world comparison".
@JACKnJESUS4 ай бұрын
@@davepastern Yes, it an amplification, which I did not bring up since it is irrelevant to equivalency. When trying to go...match to match...FF to crop (any crop) the marketing depts. all concentrate on focal length...because it can be spun as a positive. The rest is...left off...because most camera companies sell more than one format...so they remain mum about it...but that's the physics of it...that's the actual equation...across the board from medium Format down to Micro format. Focal length is multiplied by crop as is aperture...and Iso is the crop squared. From my experience...only the pros know this...hobbyists...mostly do not.
@narendrairengbam1124 ай бұрын
Isn't small aperture meant for stronger bokeh. Or is it the other way.
@Andrey.Balandin4 ай бұрын
Small aperture f number means stronger boke but that also means a wider open aperture. So the wider the lower the aperture number The stronger the boke
@glamych2 ай бұрын
Мусор же, он на 1.4 в лучшем случае даст вменяемую картинку.
@alba98984 ай бұрын
Can anyone here help me, I have Olympus omd m5 mii Just the body, any cheap recommendations for lenses? Travelling to indo soon would like have something small and compact but obviously shoots well
@anthonyreid72212 ай бұрын
Panasonic 25mm 1.7 is like $150usd new. Panasonic 14mm f2.5 is $110 new on ebay. Sigma 30mm 1.4 is around $200 used.
@likebliss2 ай бұрын
Wish you mentioned it wasn’t full frame at the beginning
@FalloutUrMum2 ай бұрын
Full frame lenses don't always get listed from the start that they're full frame either. Also, there is a 50mm version for full frame. But, I personally prefer crop sensor so I can't tell you if the full frame version is as good
@FeedScrn3 ай бұрын
Nice... It's an APSC lens, but they don't make one for Canon EF-S though. Oh well.
@FalloutUrMum2 ай бұрын
Third party lenses are blocked by Canon from being on s mount. Canon made the new mount to scam you so you pay too much for their proprietary lenses.
@thomasbuhrkall9693 ай бұрын
Bought it, it sucks wide open. Only centersharp else very blurred. Misleading promotion....
@FelanLP3 ай бұрын
I bought this lense and I habe the 7artisans too, and I have to say the 7 has better image quality wide open. Both less soft and less creamy/dreamy/artistic abortions it is not sharp compared to others too and it also has abortion, but not as much as the Star here, and especially not when things are supposed to be in Fokus. We'll, ok, the 7 costs more though.
@FelanLP3 ай бұрын
And one pro and one con for the star. The Fokus is a bit harder compared to the 7. This makes it less likely to accidentally turn the focus ring or turn it to far when fine tuning the focus. Which makes it easier to use wide open. That's a pro. The con is the clicked aparture. You mostly can't get in between the numbers. Yes, on the 7 you have to eyeball them, which is not as easy, especially stopped down, but at least it has an indecation for f11 and didn't just remove it completely.
@tomassoejakto2 ай бұрын
this lens is bumped to the price of a playstation 5 in my country
@Mezzy..4 ай бұрын
total newbie here- Why would you spend more money on a wider f-stop if you can just edit the photo in photoshop and blur out the background?
@bando38584 ай бұрын
Honestly not sure either, but I know that with a larger aperture opening, it allows in more light, making it better for dark photos
@y0._.4 ай бұрын
@bando3858 yep, more light better for low light conditions
@DrewMestel4 ай бұрын
Fake blur in post does not equate to real bokeh, subject separation, natural falloff, and increased light input.
@y0._.4 ай бұрын
@DrewMestel that's also true, it's hard to make a really good portrait with software instead of real one
@31pas04 ай бұрын
Or you can generate the whole image with AI instead. Oooor… use a wider f-stop lens, it’s a matter of personal preference:)
@nerys712 ай бұрын
I just wish someone would make cool lenses like this for the Canon EF mount I like my 50 megapixel Canon I don't want a mirrorless camera
@og76502 ай бұрын
You can buy the EF 50 mm f/1.4. You’ll get the same angle of view and depth of field on your FF camera as with this APSC lens. But it’s not gonna be that sharp
@R7_Studio4 ай бұрын
Even thou is a nikon lens, can it be mounted to a canon eos ?
@monax1a-yt4 ай бұрын
The 50mm 0.95 tt-artisan lens is cheaper than this and performs just as well too.
@fatherdope32393 ай бұрын
wow too funny... i came here to type the same thing. i've been shooting non-stop since i got mine last summer. similar build-quality as well - all metal and glass, feels great with a nice 'click'. that lens is absolutely amazing.
@themutekiununbi49323 ай бұрын
Saying the f0.95 doesn’t mean anything unless you have the brand
@marksieving79253 ай бұрын
Brightin Star. He says it right at the beginning of the video.
@justusgovaert4 ай бұрын
This sounds quite beautiful but i would maybe prefer just a slightly less wide aperture and instead a more unique bokeh effect instead. So something special like the bokeh effect of the Helios 44-2 (or - another number) or something similar special would be great and I would give a little smaller aperture for that 😃
@harraldschmitt91134 ай бұрын
Yeaaaah, but its for apsc. Which brings it closer to like an f1.6 on full frame. Sooo, its not really that impressive, it all depends on context
@o.a.m95154 ай бұрын
No not really, its more like f1.4
@TechnoBabble4 ай бұрын
Closer to f/1.4-1.5. Still not anything super special, but good for the price if you don't need autofocus.
@cameraz994 ай бұрын
@harraldschmitt9113 -- Only as far as depth of field is concerned. It's light-gathering ability remains the same no matter what format.
@kostasmatt3924 ай бұрын
That's what I wanted to point out. Thank you. So much wrong information these days.
@TechnoBabble4 ай бұрын
@@cameraz99 that's not how equivalency works. Smaller sensors are also worse in low light, hence why you apply the crop factor to the aperture when talking about equivalency with larger sensors.
@stuCameraman13 ай бұрын
Wow... So what if you put it on a speed booster? 👍🏼🎥🕊️😎 And was one of those pics near London Victoria? The red pillar box.
@Ni5ei3 ай бұрын
It's an APSC lens so you'd end up using only a tiny portion of your sensor.
@DeekonJones3 ай бұрын
🎉
@cruelycruel10324 ай бұрын
Chinese noctilux ..
@justshaifuladam_4 ай бұрын
My phone got that aperture setting but idk how to utilise it
@TbonyandsteakАй бұрын
Unbeatable? Was dissapointed due to his promises of sharpness. Was absolutly not impressed with that lense.
@413TomaccoRoad3 ай бұрын
Completely useless for Nikon F or Sony A mount cameras.
@WizardOfCheese2 ай бұрын
its not a 35mm f1 though, is it, it's a 50mm 1.4 because you can only use it on a crop-sensor. with busy / distracting cheap looking bokeh. nothing special.
@Keyboardwarrior423 ай бұрын
Not enough toneh.
@31pas04 ай бұрын
The bokeh is quite disturbing, to the point “I see it and I don’t like it”.
@user-kt2uz7dr2i2 ай бұрын
have you tried washing your hands?)))))
@RJMPictures4 ай бұрын
Those finger nails man. Come on lol. Take some pride in them
@TomCalton4 ай бұрын
I painted the studio floor that day, give me a break man. FFS 🤣
@RJMPictures4 ай бұрын
@@TomCalton I could see the gray floor paint too 😂 😂 😂
@josecolon81434 ай бұрын
Another rebranded speedmaster 🤦🏻♂️
@jaganberi3937Ай бұрын
Send to me this lens for Nikon fz
@drbeardo69604 ай бұрын
Too much TONEH
@richardlansing3 ай бұрын
You 'gets' what you pay 'fer'. If you want to sell something to me, slow it down, and oh yea, tell us the name of the product. My friends, as someone experienced in this field, look elsewhere.
@L3d0y12 ай бұрын
Sorry but f0.95 aps-c. Is not f0.95 at all. It's just a lie and a commercial strategy to forget to mention it directly. Not honest at all...
@malman10802 ай бұрын
This is literally how aps-c lenses are always marketed. They always give the full frame equivalent.
@L3d0y12 ай бұрын
@@malman1080 Ok, so like the fake cheese on industrial pizzas' called cheese. But it's not... And not evenly mentionned.
@GWT1m02 ай бұрын
@L3d0y1 Except F stops are ratios. Doesn't matter if it's for APS-C or for Full frame...
@L3d0y12 ай бұрын
@@GWT1m0Except that you really don't want your sensor to be reduced to aps-c format.
@malman10802 ай бұрын
@@L3d0y1 if it’s that big of a deal get a full frame sensor and forget about crop factor lol
@Owanneke3 ай бұрын
it's a crop sensor lens, it has the DOF of an f2.0 lens on full frame. not special at all.
@cyano3d3 ай бұрын
?? Bro cant do maths
@Owanneke3 ай бұрын
@@cyano3d dof in aps crop needs 2 stop correction for equivalency. so f1, f1.4, f2. You're welcome.
@IQFZ2 ай бұрын
@@Owanneke nope its about 1.5f
@wjennekens2 ай бұрын
@@Owannekeno it doesn't, only about one stop. You're thinking of M43, that's about two stops.
@LoFiAxolotl3 ай бұрын
If you want nice subject seperation learn how to use flash light... a shallow depth of field is not what seperates the subject from the background there's a reason when Annie Leibovitz shoots at f8 the subject is nicely seperated from the background and your photos just look like someone smeared vaseline on it...
@daedaluxe2 ай бұрын
lol, tell me you know nothing about photography without telling me
@LoFiAxolotl2 ай бұрын
@@daedaluxe ohhh jesus please why are people who definitely never have published anything or ever done any paid work the first who think they need to talk about photography.... jesus your parents must be so disappointed in you... 100% you've never shot with actual light and get like 10 likes when you post something on your silly little instagram... and atleast 5 of them are your family and the rest are random bots looking for engagement
@L3d0y12 ай бұрын
OK, you think you have a good depth of field seperating your subject, destroying your background to get it blurred? Go to school please.
@paristo4 ай бұрын
Not a special to have a f/0.95, that is common really. If it would be like a f/0.85, then we would be talking about something special. And shallow DOF is not ideal for subject separation. The background and foreground selection by choice of perspective and field of view is the key for a proper subject isolation. Shallow DOF comes with a severe compromise that makes photos look fad.
@markmalasics34133 ай бұрын
"...I think this lens is a total steal." Really? Who TF are YOU that anyone should take your word for anything? Another YT self-described expert....one of millions?
@nitikeshpujari31294 ай бұрын
Bro clean your nails
@chrisealdana3 ай бұрын
Blah blah blah shallow depth of field is OVERRATED
@cashews4you4 ай бұрын
f.95 is good for subject separation? Brother, you're gonna be separating the subject from itself with that aperture lmfao
@s_t_r_a_y_e_dАй бұрын
brightinstar are overpriced clout chasers
@TomCaltonАй бұрын
What do you base that on, out of interest? I test A LOT of lenses, and by and large, Brightin Star lenses are very good in terms of build quality and value for money.