Me whenever I hear the end music: oh no

Broooo😂😂😂😂

Fr XD XD

Hahaahahahahahaha

Unlike the actual OKB, there is no amateur painter telling Bitt3r what to do, so it is actually better than the reality of the time. The OKB had many sound ideas i.e. to reposition behind the Dnipro, but the painter decided he didn't want to give up the minerals in Eastern Ukraine among other things such as Operation Citadel

He definitely has, have you seen a disaster save from about a year ago where Italy I think got naval invaded after probably getting raided and losing their navy. I don’t recall I haven’t seen that video in a while. In the message sent to him, the guy said Mussolini was being incompetent and got naval invaded.

Here he also did nothing...

EMOTIONAL DAMAGE!!!!

In real life too

Did you have any sexual relations with that FUHRER??

In the same boat

Yeah absolutely

Yup

Yup

I think that's the "Major Soviet Offensive" thing

@@buddermonger2000 they kinda suck and arent worth setting up as a player. they should be buffed and easier to setup for the AI

Why? The ports defended successfully against the direct naval invasions, so more naval forts wouldn't have made a difference. I have to think that his forts were indeed built to defend against the landed divisions on the sides, which arguably they did.

Steiner’s counterattack was the last desperate measure, this date was way before when the germans were actually still strong but the soviets just went insane on them

Yes it did good looking heavy from tf2

Thank you so much 😀

Like watching an Austrian artist

Wunderwaffe finna be crazy

And if you release all possible puppets as France, you have like 400 in 1940 and carry the allies to victory.

the mod was made by a wehraboo chudcel so it's not surprising

Glad you like them!

@@Bitt3rSteel your pronounciations of city names in that country’s language are rather annoying

It definitely helps when you're running out of manpower

It does help to get veteran divisions + manpower. The reason he took them off is because he had plenty of manpower, and therefore its better to produce something other than the support equipment needed to maintain field hospitals.

​@@theguy3517 Understandable. Why did he get rid of the anti-tank though? Was it not worth it to help withstand the soviet offenses?

@@Hedlum generally in singleplayer the AI tanks that get made don't have enough armor for you to need dedicaed anti-tank, where artillery (and even sometimes anti-air because that has piercing) will do to pierce the tanks- not sure what the tanks premade in this mod are though so maybe the anti-tank would've been nice

@@theguy3517 he was short of manpower at the start

Ah, but rangers are even better. And that's what I used

ye fair enough im sorry to say i didnt watch the vid fully before making the comment good vid also btw @@Bitt3rSteel

25%? 10%. Also line AA is SIGNIFICANTLY more expensive than support AA with the only advantage being the ability to shoot more planes down. when you already have an air force at least capable of intercepting planes, your IC is much better spent on more fightera

ye sorry ma bad 10%, and i agree that it is usually better but you only build air if you have air supremacy otherwise aa is good dosnt matter that its expensive its still worth it@@boop7441

Where have you learned such sorcery from

Well the reason it's cheese is because the AI will continue to funnel it even after the units are destroyed. Where a real commander (or even player) will understand that such a place is surrounded and won't try it again.

Yeah but a real life army wouldn’t just keep landing in the same port repeatedly

​@@whitezombie10lmao, that's what Ukraine does near kherson

@@user-zn7nd5ti6w No Kyiv? No Kherson? No Kharkov? No victory in 3 days? You must be coping hard mate. Especially since the Ukrainian marines near Kherson are holding on constantly... doesn't sound to me like they're losing a lot of men there.

@iegoriasynetskyi1003 lmao, even western news call it a suicide mission. Poor Ukrainians are dying as a PR move to show some fighting for corrupt leadership of Ukraine to beg for more weapons.

he did 😐

That's kinda the point? Unless he didn't mean to

@@glauberglousger956 the entire point of the atlantikwall is to defend against naval invasions. Coastal forts boost against naval invasions, but he (most likely accidentally) built land forts

@@donpollo3154I think he built both

@@donpollo3154 That'd be the case if you were defending against the invasion itself, but the goal is to defend the ports So when/if the enemy lands, because they're now land troops, it's harder for them to take the port (Or at least that's why I do it, can't tell if it was done intentionally for the same reason here)

Yeah the debuffs basically allows germany to full blitz soviets with divs that are 80% tanks lol

Hope you enjoyed it!

AA would be the better bet, yes

havent played in a while so im not sure how accurate this is, but i remember seeing a pp cost for starting focuses if you let the 10 free days build up

The PP is deducted once you pick a focus

@@Bitt3rSteel That makes sense. Thank you!

​@@dedelblute3946Theoretically it can still be used in certain situations. For example, you finish a focus on 130 pp and you want an advisor, you can wait until the last moment in order to hire them quicker (for example a silent workhorse) then select the focus and deduct 10 pp from 0. The use cases are very few and rare though. The most useful scenario I can think of is if you're playing some kind of mod that reduces pp gain (if overall pp gain is +1.2 or even something like +0.8 the -1 from a focus is a lot bigger). For example if you're playing KR and you have negative pp gain (below +1, so positive when not doing a focus) if you get just below a necessary amount of pp (say 144 pp) and you finish a focus it is the difference between getting the advisor or not (and if it is a silent workhorse maybe even restoring positive pp flow much sooner, gaining you lots of pp long term). These scenarios where it lines up like this are very rare though, and in these cases you may want to just waste some days to get that extra pp. Most of the time when using it it is more of the first example.

Just buff axis in 1939 start and play as soviets on the hardest difficulty, pretty cool challenge.

You know it!

You mostly don't, you deal with it by supply light divisions and motorized logistics. Most of the time it is a waste of resources to build infrastructure there.

Without industry you can't really build much supply infrastructure. Maybe a single railway and a hub or two on the border. Otherwise invest in logistics companies and trucks to make supplies last longer/go further on the map. Small divisions that don't use much supply also help

Doesn’t it drastically increase the plane production cost?

That's absurdly expensive

Wunderwaffen

but trades very well@@Bitt3rSteeli did some tests by myself and it was very ic efficient, due to the high air defence its losses are minimal and its high air attack kills so many fighters (my tests where i had an equal amout of ic on both sides testing my design against other popular designs)

Bro wanted to build the me262

9/0 or 9/1, sometimes 6/1 for 15 w

@@Bitt3rSteel I see, thank you. Just needed to know if I was using the correct templates or if I needed to switch it up. Thanks again.

I try to Sprinkle those in

Mostly, Hoi4 is game of experience, you can do the exact same as someone else and have a different outcome. My personal statement: 27 width divisions Aircraft priority Fight battles only when victory is assured,,don't throw men away to die

Blast from the past

I misspoke, He's actually leading my mountaineers

You need enough org and breakthrough to make that soft attack worth anything

Cut it short before it could really threaten me, fortunately