I hope popular streamer Ludwig doesn't use ai to impersonate good youtubers like mogul mail
@jocosesonata3 ай бұрын
Just sounds like they need to collab.
@unsaltedskies3 ай бұрын
Have you ever seen both of them in the same room at the same time? Makes you think...
@sejtbrugernavn3 ай бұрын
I think maga mail is the original
@hnorth52053 ай бұрын
Ludwig has been copying Mogulmail for years already yet no one calls him out
@jocosesonata3 ай бұрын
@@hnorth5205 Now that you mentioned it, he even has the same hairstyle as Mogul! Bruh, this Ludwig guy has no shame.
@B3b0_W3b03 ай бұрын
That intro segment that was played definitely did scare me…that was NOT a mogul move
@kaboomer3 ай бұрын
Huge blunder
@fyrnxx3 ай бұрын
@@kaboomer polar opposite of "outstanding move"
@tabithal29773 ай бұрын
I dont understand, why was spongebob moaning is own name? Shouslnt it have been someone else's name or a differenr voice?
@Nutcruncher3 ай бұрын
@@tabithal2977its like if they had a cool episode where spongebob was turned into a pokemon but its also at the same time a sex-ed episode
@mycookiehasnoname2 ай бұрын
@@NutcruncherI read these comments before actually watching the video and I've pretty much never been as confused as this shit made me before lmao
@Maria_7453 ай бұрын
The fact that they asked her again so close to the release makes me think they already trained it on her voice and had the soundalike voice actress as a backup
@MoonFrogg3 ай бұрын
That is totally bizarre to think about, like they would have to either delay the product release OR just magically reveal her perfectly trained voice less than a day after.
@louiemitchell36903 ай бұрын
vince staples, dope as hell
@Revadike3 ай бұрын
Nah, I'm sure they can change the voice on the fly, just like that. They could definitely add an option to upload your own voice, but they won't for obvious reasons.
@LoveOlsson983 ай бұрын
@@Revadike I'm guessing you'd need a lot of voice samples to make it sound as good as it does right now, so it's not something you'd do during an afternoon. The easiest way would be if you had hours upon hours of footage of someone speaking in a lot for different emotional ranges, but to get that the person who's voice you're copying is going to have to be a prolific actress or something...
@Somerled_Pox3 ай бұрын
@@LoveOlsson98 It used to be the case years ago But now you can have a few minutes of footage and it'll clone very accurately.
@breadkaczynski3 ай бұрын
1:08 huge opportunity missed to say "and I'm not talking about spongebob"
@CaptainBrawl_3 ай бұрын
😂
@TytusLight3 ай бұрын
HUGE miss Lwig
@13a1Vana3 ай бұрын
There's 0 chance they didn't choose someone who sounds like Scarlett on purpose. Instant recognition with people who haven't even seen the movie and just general appeal for something like that would be more than enough reason to do so. I'd say I'm not into all of that but if they make the Ana De Armas AI from Blade Runner 2049 I'm cooked
@the_Royal_Crow3 ай бұрын
Honestly if they can just make it GLaDOS it's all over for me.
@philritter90423 ай бұрын
@@the_Royal_Crowpretty sure Glados isn’t a problem I have seen a few voice bots who pretty much nailed her voice probably because it’s kinda robotic from the start
@boop3 ай бұрын
@@the_Royal_Crow smash
@choiswimmer3 ай бұрын
You can literally generate anyone's voice using metavoice
@the_Royal_Crow3 ай бұрын
@@philritter9042 Sure but can they nail her snark? That's what it's all about.
@ethanstyant97043 ай бұрын
Tech bros and not understanding consent. Name a more iconic duo
@BringBackOGClubPenguin2 ай бұрын
Tech bros and wanting a robot gf
@mesiroy12342 ай бұрын
6:58 tech bro , ceo not snitching on himself😂😂
@lalaj28872 ай бұрын
Minecraft youtuber at peak 1 million subscriber and miner
@ArlindoBuriti2 ай бұрын
consent to what? is another person KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK what the fuck are you talking about?
@Loll0saurus2 ай бұрын
Sick elitists and trying to ban people because they sound like you?
@jonathonreed24173 ай бұрын
That's pretty damning to reach out for permission two days before.
@user-er1fs3je4x3 ай бұрын
Eh is it? They asked her months ago, maybe they were checking if she changed her mind before they release it. If they used someone who just sounds like Scarlett and not actual voice clips of her - I don't see any issue.
@adeidara99553 ай бұрын
New updates say OpenAI casted the original voice actor before talking to Scarlett.
@adidab143 ай бұрын
@@user-er1fs3je4x right like unless they used specific exact lines from the movie or something i don't see how they could possible prove infringement. Like does Scar Jo have copyright protection over just a slightly deep voiced woman being... nice or witty? It may be creepy and whatever but i can't possibly see how this is infringement unless there's other stuff we don't know about. You can't own the rights to a female voice that behaves kinda like a character you once played in the most vague way possible.
@soasertsus3 ай бұрын
Is it? I think they didn't even have to offer, it was a courtesy to first offer the original actress that played the character that inspired them. She said no, so they hired someone else with a similar voice. Not to impersonate Scarlet Johansson, to reference the iconic AI character from Her by getting a voice that is reminiscent of it. Because, you know, their product has a lot of parallels with the movie. ScarJo doesn't own the copyright to Her, or the copyright to the voice of the other voice actress who happens to sound similar to her, I don't see how she has any case or legitimate grievance here. Is that other actress just not supposed to work because she sounds too similar to someone more famous?
@Toastybees3 ай бұрын
@@adidab14What a bunch of rules lawyer D&D player nonsense. If it's a character she played and it's using a voice obviously intended to sound exactly like her, it's infringement. Intent matters more than you think.
@azimali3223 ай бұрын
I just want to see our old ass judicial system try to catch up to AI chatbots and voicebots. Tbh, they won't catch up to that... They will just look at the internal memos and make OpenAI pay ScaJo for trying to use Her-like AI voicelines.
@K311WasHere3 ай бұрын
Our judicial systems too busy trying to take the freedom of religion out of our amendments to do anything of the sort. Plus everyone in the gov is far too old to comprehend that they need to do something
@juanacosta43513 ай бұрын
Bro they are still trying to legislate tiktok, they are at least 7 years behind
@user-er1fs3je4x3 ай бұрын
'her-like' lol, celebrities don't magically gain rights over everyone who sounds like them. Imagine if you sounded like some random celebrity and because of that, you could never use your voice for anything because they are already famous and have a similar voice. As long as OpenAI is not claiming that Scarlett voiced the thing and as long as they didn't train it on her voice, they are perfectly clear in my eyes
@JustSomeoneRandom13243 ай бұрын
@@user-er1fs3je4x so what you're saying is that laws should be created that force transparency in the data these things are created on. Because you don't want to pay ScaJo unnecessarily, but you shouldn't be able to steal people's voices either.
@user-er1fs3je4x3 ай бұрын
@@JustSomeoneRandom1324 im all for transparency laws for ai training sets. What I'm saying is that many people sound "alike" in the world and some of them are celebrities. Do you think that everyone who sounds vaguely similar to a celeb should just never talk in a microphone and should not be allowed to be a voice actor for anything? They haven't mentioned Scarlett in any of the promo materials so they are not using her likeness. If her voice is not in the training data, there is no issue.
@TwistVisuals3 ай бұрын
In the movie Her, they show the importance of real human connection in the end, and how AI is not the answer. Looks like Sam Altman didn't understand or care about the point of the movie.
@badaboum23 ай бұрын
Did the people in the movie buy AI stuff? I think he understood the part he wanted to understand as a businessman.
@RobotnikPlngas3 ай бұрын
@@badaboum2 In the movie EVERYONE has an AI assistant, and the whole movie is pretty much Joaquin Phoenix struggling with loneliness and trying to find connection, in the end it turns out like half the world is in a relationship with their AI.
@badaboum23 ай бұрын
@@RobotnikPlngas I understand that, that was a rhetorical question to show that businesses don't care about "the point" if they can make money.
@RobotnikPlngas3 ай бұрын
@@badaboum2 Right, leave it to the corporate buddy bros to mess up a whole narrative and just tunnel vision into lead magnet or traction or whatever these guys masturbate to.
@RobotnikPlngas3 ай бұрын
@@badaboum2 Right, I guess the marketing bros are too busy touching themselves to market traction or lead generation or whatever it is they get off to instead of looking at the whole picture.
@gozz4573 ай бұрын
I don’t know if LLMs will be what breaks the camels back but if there’s one thing the last 5 years has taught me is that proactive legislation will always be too slow and accelerationists will act in self interest at the expense of us all.
@tukib_3 ай бұрын
Scraping big data has been around for quite a while and has already been challenged legally. See google books for instance. Legislation also already exists for decision support systems and are being further expanded, e.g EU AI act. There's a reason why the media pretends stricter IP infringement laws will fix worker exploitation. Hint: when you upload content to KZfaq you grant an irrevocable licence for Google to use it for anything
@incription3 ай бұрын
Lol if anything using this data for LLMs is the most useful thing you can do with it, as opposed to feeding the ad and social media algorithms
@Toxic-Pyro3 ай бұрын
@@incriptionjust because one rich asshole is profiting off my data doesn’t mean I’m also fine with another different rich asshole also profiting off my data
@mahuk.3 ай бұрын
what if that self interest is the wellbeing of the majority?
@chuckle52533 ай бұрын
@@mahuk.There are some people that are going out for the progression of mankind, for sure. Those guys don't sit in many board meetings. Unfortunately the drive to be at the head of a powerful company and the drive to make the world better altruistically do not easily coexist in one person.
@luigiboyinblu3 ай бұрын
The fact that they want to replicate Her as much as possible just shows that they completely missed the point of the whole movie.
@adeidara99553 ай бұрын
What was the point? If you’re claiming it’s a dystopia, the director, Spike Jonze, don’t want it to be labeled as Dystopian. It’s a very nuance movie.
@master1442p3 ай бұрын
Go on.. explain the point of her
@user-er1fs3je4x3 ай бұрын
here's a reminder that movie directors are not psychics that can predict the future. They make a story that sounds interesting and people will enjoy watching. Something ending badly in a movie brings you exactly zero information about how that thing will end up in real life.
@user-er1fs3je4x3 ай бұрын
@@master1442p thanks, I haven't watched it, I just hate when people try to make a point about something being bad by comparing to a movie plot. Same for 'this is a black mirror episode omg'. It's just entertainment
@master1442p3 ай бұрын
@@user-er1fs3je4x people keep mentioning her and the ending as a reason not to go along with ai so I watched it expecting a brutal ending only for me to be more pro AI by the end 😂
@Gnalysis3 ай бұрын
I think Scarlett Johansen will be one of the first cases to outline the rules of AI if she does bring OpenAI to court.
@ls2000763 ай бұрын
@JohnMarston-sf1vkAlright kid, you sound like a liberal
@adeidara99553 ай бұрын
@@ls200076huh what
@FlopgamingOne3 ай бұрын
@@ls200076 Bad argument
@TrueOracle3 ай бұрын
@@ls200076bro what? He's not the one being a snowflake here...
@A_Veget4ble3 ай бұрын
@JohnMarston-sf1vkwhatever you say kiddo, now do you want your juice box?
@TheBillJohnsonVarietyHour3 ай бұрын
My issue is that they've continued not addressing the hallucination issue. Generative models have no way to fact-check the information they spew out, even using their own training data, and that's reflected in the fact they continuously get things wrong. And it isn't like a human getting something wrong, where a correction results in a change, with generative models you just have to keep generating until it isn't wrong. More powerful models are better at hiding the issue, but there is still no process to eliminate the model just making shit up. Yeah, someone's gonna try to fuck the robot, they already are with inferior versions, but the underlying issue with the "groundbreaking" stuff is that occasionally it's gonna tell a kid that the hypotenuse is actually the shortest side of the triangle or translate a conversation about the weather into one about how nice this clear blue sheep herder is. The issue also gets markedly worse the more complex and niche the topic. Sure, weird translation is fine for pleasantries, but deeper conversation? You want to accidentally tell someone from the congo about the virtues of colonialism? Anyways its funny that open ai has fully committed to the identity of "Good news! We invented the torture matrix from famous science fiction novel: Please Don't Invent the Torture Matrix!"
@VinchVideos3 ай бұрын
It's hard to talk about this being a layman who doesn't have tech bro cred (I wonder how many engineers/comp sci/data scientists even fully understand how the latest versions of AI work) without being dismissed, but it just seems intuitively true from reading about it and using the damn thing that it's just a regurgitation machine that incests data into a useless blob that only passes the smell test for big headed programmers who think they understand how every other discipline works better than other professionals and proceed to release and sell these tools to even more conceited executives who are already using it to pump out articles, content, marketing copy, designs, internal comms, literature and even educational texts without realizing they are just funding very early and misguided research by actively worsening their products and structure until it becomes impossible to ignore. Try to get an AI to write a run on sentence like that.
@BubblyBoar3 ай бұрын
It's a marketing scheme. Always has been. Use, some of the technology is new and interesting, but at the end of the day it's all marketing.
@thekroomfster3 ай бұрын
The fact everyone calls it Artificial Intelligence like we've seen the birth of AM just goes to show how impressionable the public is. Terminology like this matters a lot. People will widely adopt it regardless of its extremely obvious flaws, because 'uhm, like. . . I've got my AI like in the movies man.' Can't wait to see the regular human being becoming even more inane and incompetent, because why learn anything or interact with others when you have your shitty yesman algorithm to tell you you're a big boy.
@saamqri25073 ай бұрын
good analysis!
@_holy__ghost3 ай бұрын
@@VinchVideosagreed. as a translator/interpreter it is goddamn impossible trying to explain to people why chatgpt can't do my job. its like they think i spent 5 years at university just reading a dictionary instead of actually learning a professional skill that cant just be replicated by guesswork
@robowealthy8203 ай бұрын
The fact they asked again 2 days before is insane.
@lucas_lipp3 ай бұрын
Always remember, kids, the hypothenuse is always opposite the 90° angle, in a triangle that has one. And a^2+b^2=c^2 only matches the pythagoream theorem, if it's describing a triangle with a 90° angle, and if c is the hypothenuse.
@cookie144673 ай бұрын
In addition, the hypotenuse is ALWAYS the longest side of any right triangle
@Almighty-Pwr3 ай бұрын
@@cookie14467right on
@BigMikeyT7303 ай бұрын
I wish I was high on potenuse.
@TheSlick4472 ай бұрын
@@BigMikeyT730 I wish I was high on potenuse. *Everyone laughs way more when I say it*
@Almighty-Pwr2 ай бұрын
@@TheSlick447 i most certainly laughed
@bblvrable3 ай бұрын
You *know* Altman has a TTS model with ScarJo's actual voice done up and ready to go at a moment's notice. In fact, I bet his admin-level version of GTP-4o speaks to him in her voice.
@pen_bapp3 ай бұрын
maybe it’s just me, but it’s kind of horrifying seeing that AI teacher. There’s going to be so many awful repercussions just because of that.
@zhen70203 ай бұрын
Like what repercussions?
@cooltwittertag3 ай бұрын
@@zhen7020 interpersonal connections are necessary for proper brain development in children. AI cannot replace a proper human teacher, especially not a good one.
@vKILLZ0NEv3 ай бұрын
@@cooltwittertag And it isn't meant to. It IS meant to act as tutor/study aid. Not replace the teacher.
@emblemblade92453 ай бұрын
@@vKILLZ0NEvSure, but people always take the path of least resistance when they’re not informed of the consequences
@patr2673 ай бұрын
@@zhen7020also it’s impossible to fact-check the things AI says, it’s just generating responses. It may be accurate the vast majority of the time but how about when it’s not?
@doziergames3 ай бұрын
there's literally a black mirror episode about this in the new season
@TheAbdou273 ай бұрын
There's a new black mirror season?
@barabara98553 ай бұрын
Are you talking about Joan is Awful?
@TheAbdou273 ай бұрын
@@barabara9855 I think they are, in which case it's really not a *new* season
@Ben-ek1fz3 ай бұрын
@@TheAbdou27literally 😂 .
@rockinggamerdude3 ай бұрын
0:33 you can see him trying not to laugh
@fishnewt13313 ай бұрын
Lol, literally swallowing his laughter down.
@Nekomosh0043 ай бұрын
😂
@philritter90423 ай бұрын
Either that or he is internally crying thinking of what his job has come too😂
@kirianray3 ай бұрын
1:08 just like spongebob just did...
@nobodyimportant71853 ай бұрын
Thats exactly what I thought
@Benw88882 ай бұрын
Apparently there's a historical example (precedent) where Ford hired impersonators of singers for an ad when the original singers declined, and Ford lost the court case when the singers sued (Midler v. Ford Motor Co.).
@netplayfalco73073 ай бұрын
I think what makes it crazier this isn’t the first time this happened with Scarlett Johansson. Back somewhere in November of 2023 she sued an AI app for making AI photos of her and using her voice in an advertisement on Twitter. She was always vocal on this stuff, in 2018 talking about ai begins with p ends with n, and how it was so widespread that her team couldn’t do anything about it, I’m pretty sure Atrioc mentioned it in his apology/update on what he’s doing/done to try to fix what he did, showing how big the issue at hand was
@JoshIsStruggling3 ай бұрын
Holy shit Mogul Mail broke into Ludwig’s new setup again? He can’t keep getting away with this.
@ryantabel86893 ай бұрын
Not Ludwig saying he only uses AI for TTS when he admitted yesterday to using ChatGPT for every Japanese lesson he's been doing
@LeonLucena3 ай бұрын
Exactly, It's Not Ludwig, It's Mogul Mail.
@cooltwittertag3 ай бұрын
hes using youtube and google and his camera app and all of these are ai tools
@soasertsus3 ай бұрын
Anti-AI Andys are delusional and are going to be very blindsided by what's coming. AI tools are already used every day but people just don't realize it.
@Allen_lena3 ай бұрын
Yeah, also, predictive keyboard/autocorrect on the phone, google tools, Siri, plenty of stuff has AI and people don't think about it twice.
@cooltwittertag3 ай бұрын
@@Allen_lena its literally unavoidable to use ai tools on the daily unless you are amish
@ypesie3 ай бұрын
This is the same thing that has happened to artists since all the AI "art" stuff came out. It's disgusting and The founder of the AI model basically said "well it's already out there now so nothing we can do" So disgusting behaviour!
@peterswift61163 ай бұрын
AI could cure cancer, solve world hunger, create world peace. And you're worried about a couple of creators being mad because a computer does there job better than them. Grow up!
@ypesie3 ай бұрын
@@peterswift6116 I know AI could do all these things and it's amazing. I am for AI. But the important thing is to have laws for it as well so that they can't steal without any reprecussion, that is just wrong. That has nothing to do with stopping AI as a whole. I think it's amazing to see where AI can take us. Just as long as it's ethical
@Code_Machine2 ай бұрын
@@peterswift6116 WE could do all those things ourselves, but noooooo, let's spend our time standing on a soap box telling people to grow up because gosh darn it getting upset that a robot is replacing you and that now both your career and degree are irrelevant and you can't find work is just sooooooooo damn immature! Amirite guys? Please shower this man with validation and fake internet points so that he may know how much better he is than everyone else. Also, please remember to forget this sentiment as when AI inevitably replaces him too, he intends to scream from the rooftops about how unfair the world is because AI should only replace jobs that aren't his!!1!1!
@peterswift61162 ай бұрын
@@Code_Machine bro if you think im saying that because i want 'internet points' then your life must be really sad. I dont try to validate myself in the youtube comments lol I have a real life for that. Regardless I am right, AI is positive and everyone who complains and it replacing them is just too dumb and lazy to find real work for themselves. Also the other thing is, AI is inevitable. Neither you nor me nor anyone in this comment section could make any impact on how much AI there will be in the future. So everyone should stop being whiny little bitches about it and just accept it will be part of society. You know a hundred of years ago in the industrial revolution everyone was scared all there jobs would get replaced because of the impending 'automation'. And they were right, millions of factory jobs got replaced. But look what happened, they found new jobs and society prospered. we laugh at those people now. You are no different, just a unimpactful pleb who's only contribution to society is complaining.
@peterswift61162 ай бұрын
@@Code_Machine bro if you think im saying that because i want 'internet points' then your life must be really sad. I dont try to validate myself in the youtube comments lol I have a real life for that. Regardless I am right, AI is positive and everyone who complains and it replacing them is just too dumb and lazy to find real work for themselves. Also the other thing is, AI is inevitable. Neither you nor me nor anyone in this comment section could make any impact on how much AI there will be in the future. So everyone should stop being whiny little bitches about it and just accept it will be part of society. You know a hundred of years ago in the industrial revolution everyone was scared all there jobs would get replaced because of the impending 'automation'. And they were right, millions of factory jobs got replaced. But look what happened, they found new jobs and society prospered. we laugh at those people now. You are no different, just a unimpactful pleb who's only contribution to society is complaining.
@sweeeenay3 ай бұрын
I like this format and how the remaining tabs is a sort of a reverse progress bar for the video.
@RetreatSequel3 ай бұрын
Robo Rizz got me bricked up fr 😞
@driftingobsidian87923 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@nostalgia39793 ай бұрын
The AI respond to the interview question literally gave me chills due how realistic it sounds...just nah bro, this is getting freaky af...
@Sw4lley3 ай бұрын
It for sure doesn’t help that Scarlet Johanson is kinda big on Actors rights. She won’t need some settlement, she will likely go all the way for answers.
@FPSZeno3 ай бұрын
0:29 I felt that
@WalnutWarrior73 ай бұрын
OpenAI trying to catch the biggest and juiciest class-action suit in history 😂
@rando5213 ай бұрын
all it takes is the AI to mess up while translating and there goes your visa
@Techno_Gecko3 ай бұрын
"that's the Malenia of lawsuits" killed me lmao
@cosmicwillow3 ай бұрын
the thing is, the positives do not outweigh the negatives. so many of the positives aid in loosing the interpersonal connections that make us human. and that is a huge, terrifying problem. also nice room hope chat doesn't mess it up with things that may or may not spin
@cooltwittertag3 ай бұрын
its been proven again and again that a lack of human relationships negatively affects brain development in a number of ways
@peterswift61163 ай бұрын
AI could cure cancer, solve world hunger, create world peace. And you're worried about a couple of creators being mad because a computer does there job better than them. Grow up!
@cosmicwillow3 ай бұрын
@@peterswift6116 no it absolutely cannot solve those things. also get your reading comprehension checked, thats not all i was talking about.
@soggos7323 ай бұрын
are you copy pasting this message on multiple comments or are your just a bot LMAO
@soggos7323 ай бұрын
regardless this is a program that generates mid essays, not an actual intelligence it cannot solve problems it just generates text
@mr.unicum3 ай бұрын
Her, Detroit become human, now this - Scarlett can't catch a break from ai lol
@Noobfile13 ай бұрын
hella dystopian
@jeysonc3 ай бұрын
i was just reading about this on reddit and then mogul mail uploads about it. good service.
@MorningGlorySewingClub3 ай бұрын
00:42 seconds was the climax of the vid
@meisi21413 ай бұрын
00:28 He looks so sad, so defeated
@linkshadow23 ай бұрын
Legit, I appreciate your Mogul Mail content so much.
@nir53893 ай бұрын
AI rizzing me up before i get ready for an interview so i get all giggly on the interview
@demacherius12 ай бұрын
Just to be correct settling a lawsuit is not winning and has no affect on future lawsuits.
@aiheim69713 ай бұрын
i remember ti8 when openai was introduced to dota 2, who knew theyd go this big.
@buford_milo75573 ай бұрын
He’s saying stuff that’s true
@thatonevideo18753 ай бұрын
Wow bro that's crazy
@cloudee_1080_ti3 ай бұрын
What?! Nah, bro's on one.
@aakarshan46443 ай бұрын
ngl bro ngl
@sahlikh18293 ай бұрын
damn that's craaazy
@androow19833 ай бұрын
Debatable
@8pauul3 ай бұрын
the gaze of disappointment, sadness and regret in ludwig's eyes when he plays the sponge bob AI voice explains so much.
@redred77022 ай бұрын
The law of unintended consequences is strong with this… entire situation.
@ScarySkele3 ай бұрын
If you steal from the rich you go to jail trying to make it rich…. If the rich steal from you, they get richer
@flowden8353 ай бұрын
I actually really like these type of videos, I'm not always caught up with these small things that are happening in the world.
@sirwompwompthegreat3 ай бұрын
As a teacher watching this on my break, I really enjoyed the first ~45 seconds of this Mogul Mail!
@jsfjames2 ай бұрын
Should be an easy case. If there's a different person behind the voice, it doesn't matter how she feels about it. Imagine if a studio was going to film a movie and asked her to be in it, and she said no. To my knowledge, it is not illegal for them to go hire a different actress that looks a lot like her if that was the original look of the role for the movie. Even if they put the script together with her in mind. Her saying since I said no, you have to now change the look of the main character is a very bold thing to do.
@tag180rotax3 ай бұрын
Coming fast like spongebob
@baconman80443 ай бұрын
Lud's face during the spongebob voice tickled my pickle
@cy7282 ай бұрын
No it isn't illegal to train AI on copyrighted data, It's legal president in the US and it's passed law in the EU that training AI can not possibly be copyright because the original data is not stored in the model and can't be retrieved, that isn't going to change the economic benefits are too great to ignore, get used to it.
@StuartsParent2 ай бұрын
3:24 correct
@MyNameKram3 ай бұрын
RIP to anyone listening to the intro with max volume while having no headphones on
@robowealthy8203 ай бұрын
He looks so sad at the beginning
@Shane_McGillicuddy3 ай бұрын
The Employees at OpenAi who watched Her, are the same type of people who think Rosebud was only a sled, and not much else.
@codetaku3 ай бұрын
Every time Greg Brockman is in the news I just think about how crazy it is that he was my roommate for a semester at MIT when he transferred from Harvard
@ReelRai3 ай бұрын
How natural and realistic the GPT-40 sounds like is what scares me. It looks like we're straight up heading to some cyberpunk dystopia where majority of the population dates some AI girl/boyfriend, and that honestly scares me. We laugh and joke about it now, who would be lonely enough to date such a thing? But AI is barely taking its first baby steps, imagine in a couple of years how unbelievably good it'll be. And once it's virtually impossible to distinguish if the person you're talking to is real or not, there's a huge amount of people who'd choose to date the perfect parter you can have immediately without any effort rather than go out into the real world.
@ReelRai2 ай бұрын
@@DerekHansell We don't need a general AI that can solve complex problems for the dystopia I described, we only need a chatbot using machine learning that is good enough to fool most humans that its a real person talking/chatting.
@rose_cat_02 ай бұрын
lol
@HyperkalemiaSineWave2 ай бұрын
@@ReelRaiIt also needs to have a convincing memory. But otherwise yup:(
@wyrmster48863 ай бұрын
Art and music should be off limits for AI, ai should be used for those jobs people hste, not their passions
@galifrey22423 ай бұрын
I disagree, everyone should be able to create their own musics or videos even if they have no talent. AI will allow everyone to make their own high quality music , movies and entertainment with no effort. How is that not a good thing ? Artists are just too selfish to share their ability to create with the common people.
@letsgetfluffy31383 ай бұрын
@@galifrey2242Nope, they are creating nothing, they are merely stealing stuff and calling ut their creation, instead of learning a skill
@letsgetfluffy31383 ай бұрын
@@galifrey2242creating is easy, all you need is a pencil and a paper, artist's aren't selfish for being against theft, and AI is the lazy route
@BillSullivanosu3 ай бұрын
@@galifrey2242 bro its not an ability they own you just haven't put in the effort to gain the ability and want to take a shortcut to get where they got with effort
@Nathan472232 ай бұрын
@@letsgetfluffy3138 no, ai art is still art
@LunarPriestessYT3 ай бұрын
That spongebob text to speech is so cursed
@MoonFrogg3 ай бұрын
this is INSANE and I'm really glad to see Ludwig commenting on it
@RyanReynolds-_-4203 ай бұрын
Wtf Why is Mogul Mail in the same new room as the other less attractive streamer Ludwig
@MrJoosebawkz3 ай бұрын
4:10 theyre just staring at the phone instead of eachother
@Taksheel3 ай бұрын
I think it's more for demonstration purposes
@doobzsalam18473 ай бұрын
Yeah it’s almost like they are demonstrating…a product used on a phone
@capy98463 ай бұрын
It is still way smoother than any other translator.
@schmarcel42383 ай бұрын
Maybe they're autistic, don't shame them
@MrJoosebawkz3 ай бұрын
@@doobzsalam1847 how does staring at the phone demonstrate the product better? I’d think a proper demonstration would show them having a natural conversation no? Not really a big deal just a weird choice that they went out of their way to make technology that opens up human connections on an incredible scale look robotic and unpersonal in a product demonstration.
@natchut3 ай бұрын
This video was amazing to me. About to graduate with a degree in cognitive science and trying to get into the world of AI legislation, what you have said has been so much more representative of AI than what most "experts" have claimed on mainstream news outlets like CNN. There's a lot of misinfo out there about AI because it's complicated but props to Ludwig for actually doing some research.
@4n0n4U3 ай бұрын
Thank god for you Lud, seriously. You report stuff that actually matters to the new generations.
@mr.tv0013 ай бұрын
an etimology guy on tiktok said that over 60000 papers were made with ai in the past year by looking for bias of specific words being used
@Benw88883 ай бұрын
If OpenAI merely hired a voice actor with a scarily similar voice, it might be hard to prosecute them
@BubblyBoar3 ай бұрын
Plausible Deniability isn't the defense people are making it out to be in this regard. They screwed up by showing their intention. It's like when the Discord messages were leaked about the art AIs. Once the intention is known, saying "it just happened to end up that way!" doesn't give you the benefit of the doubt. Courts are slow, not stupid.
@Purriah3 ай бұрын
@@BubblyBoaryeah but she doesn’t own that other lady’s voice.
@cooltwittertag3 ай бұрын
@@Purriahworking as an impersonator isnt a stable job, its a liability
@BubblyBoar3 ай бұрын
@@Purriah If it's actually the other lady's voice, sure.
@Benw88882 ай бұрын
@@BubblyBoar yeah I learned more later; apparently there was a historical example (precedent) where Ford hired an impersonator of a singer for an ad when the original singer declined, and Ford lost the court case.
@4RILDIGITAL3 ай бұрын
Totally get your concerns over AI's rapid advancement and the legal grey areas surrounding it. Both exciting and worrisome times we're living in.
@wreckieralph02952 ай бұрын
Her is one of my top 3 movies
@user-xm4yf2xs6t3 ай бұрын
1:09 same
@sakurai60163 ай бұрын
nice pfp
@TheFreshPrinceofEvergreen3 ай бұрын
Ayo?
@user-xm4yf2xs6t3 ай бұрын
@@sakurai6016thanks i like yours too
@pacgamer58743 ай бұрын
5:04 these people need to log off and touch grass 💀
@JannWanna-ev3bh3 ай бұрын
Fr
@takeuchi57603 ай бұрын
It's literally their job. The people that need to log off are the ones on twitter complaining about the sky voice takedown.
@asmrelara3 ай бұрын
why is spongebob moaning his own name
@fish_cylinder3 ай бұрын
Her 2 will be a documentary
@logan-vx9zq3 ай бұрын
ai is literally ruining my life right now because i write formally and at a high level for school so detectors come back like 80-90% ai written (i am also an artist. double whammy)
@Nathan472232 ай бұрын
Adapt to the times. We can't halt technological advancements for you when the benefit is larger than you
@HyperkalemiaSineWave2 ай бұрын
@@Nathan47223I’m so happy to have our oldest mode of human expression (art) made “obsolete,” and all the joy of it sucked out, by tech bros in the name of profits they won’t ever see. The dream of being a career artist, in any field, is dead in the water now.
@logan-vx9zq2 ай бұрын
@@Nathan47223 it is not just me who is suffering.
@ved953 ай бұрын
The only thing that scares me is buzzcut Ludwig.
@stellarscorp2 ай бұрын
I feel like Lud changes stream rooms more often than he changes his underwear
@Jikuro_2 ай бұрын
Governments need to start regulating AI before it's too late.
@catcadev3 ай бұрын
I sure hope that OpenAI and these other companies are held to account. I can't believe human art and beauty, emotion, so much more was so shamelessly reduced to nothing but noise and "feeder data". It's disheartening to see this garbage replace people in their jobs, when it was both never warranted or needed.
@PaulFilmer3 ай бұрын
They didn't appear out of thin air. Why can't their be any respect in the art and beauty that goes into making it?
@HelloKittySGTC3 ай бұрын
I disagree, I want AI to replace the corruption we have in the current industry
@dimyell3 ай бұрын
@@PaulFilmer because there is no effort or beauty. Its all stolen infomation. Algorithms. AI doesn't make art. Everything you see is taken from someone else's creative efforts.
@zyansheep3 ай бұрын
If its not needed, why would it replace people's jobs? Ideally in a market economy only people who are needed get jobs...
@neociber243 ай бұрын
@@dimyell depends if you want to see software as art, that maybe it it's
@fhub293 ай бұрын
So when everyone will be able to clone their own voice, all those who have a voice similar to any celebrity won't be allowed? Finding a solution to this is not easy. For the flirty part, if you don't want it to be so you can just tell it and it will adapt to your preference (many people don't get this). I personally also don't think that's the default way the chatbot is going to speak, they might have used it just to showcase the product.
@HaydenDoingThings3 ай бұрын
The only thing scary is how rapidly businesses will be able to adopt these technologies and how slowly the governments of the world are going to be adapting to it.
@nustaniel2 ай бұрын
Big difference between using a Spongebob sounding voice and having a Spongebob sounding voice that says it is Spongebob. The latter is infringement, the former is not.
@bakedmomo56933 ай бұрын
ScarJo WON against Disney, AND somebody tried again. "She won against Disney", o7 for chat(gpt)
@yv-ui7he3 ай бұрын
WHY WAS SPONGEBOB SAYING HIS OWN NAME???????
@Avendesora3 ай бұрын
Sponges reproduce asexually, so he was absolutely fucking himself
@soullessone99053 ай бұрын
he can asexually reproduce so he just split himself in two
@1dinoshapednugget3 ай бұрын
TESTICLES TESTICLES TESTICLES
@beristainbear39242 ай бұрын
I so excited for crazy tech. It doesnt scare me bc I have no value as an influential person in the world, it would scare you way more than most of us.
@quipsilvervr3 ай бұрын
The one takeaway I'm beginning to get from your videos, is that the secret to being a famous youtuber, is to have 2 channels that people treat as 2 different people, despite your face being shown in both. The problem with voice similarities in AI, is that no matter what voice you use, it'll sound like somebody, and eventually you either need to change it to a droning robot voice, or accept that people's voices cover almost all sounds.
@scproinc2 ай бұрын
People voices are not copyrightable because there is always someone with a voice similar to one another. What is illegal is fraud or identity theft when the voice would used to pretend to be the person being imitated. But this is not what ChatGPT did. It never pretended to be Scarlet Johansson, and therefore, it is not illegal.
@cupidfia3 ай бұрын
maybe lud has actually been ai generated this whole time
@alext69333 ай бұрын
So what it's not her voice and she doesn't own things that sound similar to her. Millions of voices sound similar to others. She didn't take the bag so somebody else will.
@ATDesigns12 ай бұрын
I work as a Court Interpreter, I am cooked
@matthewjalovick3 ай бұрын
Nah. It’s chill. Can’t wait for AI Ludwig to be my friend :)
@TJMiton3 ай бұрын
i mean if they actually hired a different voice actor that happens to sound similar, what exactly is the issue? people with similar voices certainly exist.
@silverfang463 ай бұрын
The issue is whether they "happend to sound similar". If ScarJo can prove that OpenAI sought out an impersonator after she turned them down, then it is a legal case
@Lavassin3 ай бұрын
It'll definitely be interesting to see what the ruling is on this. They were clearly trying to imitate her voice, but there are billions of voices in the world. How do you then determine what voices are copyrighted and what ones aren't? You can't make a natural sounding ai voice without it sounding like someone that exists.
@sushienjoyer3 ай бұрын
There’s already a precedent court case on sth like that. *Midler V Ford* : Hiring a voice impersonator to specifically impersonate a celebrity voice to circumvent copyrights law is not allowed. Although, they have to prove that it’s intentional. Eg. Memo saying “make it sound like ScarJo” or testimony from voice actress etc.
@kylebanks133 ай бұрын
Ya except they reached out to her, she said no, they then found a voice who was exactly like her. It would be different if they had just started with a different person and didn't reach out at all
@BubblyBoar3 ай бұрын
Plausible Deniability isn't the defense people are making it out to be in this regard. They screwed up by showing their intention. It's like when the Discord messages were leaked about the art AIs. Once the intention is known, saying "it just happened to end up that way!" doesn't give you the benefit of the doubt. Courts are slow, not stupid.
@TheFudily3 ай бұрын
8:19 I don't see how it could be illegal to use a voice actress just because they sound like a celebrity. Whether intentional or not. That'd be dumb, IMO. Assuming they did actually find and use a voice actress rather than just pulling Scarlet's voice from media.
@praetorkhas16442 ай бұрын
Always remember that if something is good with AI, it’s best to assume it was stolen.
@SquaulDuNeant2 ай бұрын
Im sorry but it's more dystopian to be able to sue and control anything based off that they are "similiar" to you or something than using something without permission.
@jacobpage80283 ай бұрын
The singularity point is fast approaching...
@ThMindFdr3 ай бұрын
And we are all about to get pushed through the eye of a needle..
@raybows3 ай бұрын
0:31 he said 🥺
@SmurfFan1043 ай бұрын
Her is actually such a good movie
@fhub293 ай бұрын
"That's illegal", a few seconds later: "there's no legislation at the moment". Lol
@Meh_zzz2 ай бұрын
Exactly. KZfaqrs are always talking about "fair use", but AI training should be illegal? It is pretty much the definition of "transformative", as long as it's not trained to specifically be/talk like a specific person, of course
@sorabrend52742 ай бұрын
@@Meh_zzz AI training without explicit consent should be illegal. You shouldn't be allowed to use data without consent. Explicit consent! That means directly asking people to confirm they agree with their data and likeness being used and well...paying them for it if necessary
@TheBaldr2 ай бұрын
@@sorabrend5274Fair Use means no consent needed. Read the fair use clause, it carves out huge exceptions of using copyright for learning, training, and research.
@chrischika70262 ай бұрын
@@sorabrend5274 no you dont. do you know what fair use is ?